It was the highest respect. Ichigo is famous for his very honorable attitude towards his opponent. He wanted Ulquiorra to cut off his limbs so that the fight was fair. Now he attacked Aizen with the strongest attack that took away his powers. What a dedication. This, of course, is one look at the matter. Another reason is simply to create a fullbring arc that will lead to the final arc. Any interpretation. Manga makers love to do this. Sometimes it gets frustrating and you want answers right away. And sometimes it's great. How is it in this case? Everyone will have an opinion.
@@CelVini but he didnt even need to. the goal was to pressure Aizen enough , although he didnt know that. I believe there is no such a form to defeat Aizen with Kyoka Suigetsu , only some tricks like special Kido could defeat him. the master mind Urahara + Dangai strength > Aizen
@@sioframei Well, Dangai wasen't enough to completely make Aizen vunerable, he would just keep evolving and Ichigo knew it. It was necessary, Aizen said he would become God, no way Ichigo could keep up while Aizen evolves as much as he needs to
Repent of your sins and believe on the Adon Jesus the Christ, believe in your heart that He has died for sins and rose from the tomb on the third day and you shall receive the Holy Spirit of God and He shall dwell within you. You shall be saved. Be baptized in the name of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit! - Jesus the Christ loves you, praise YHWH our Elohim - Evidence for Jesus Christ’s existence, crucifixion, and disappearance from the tomb (He rose from it): The Lord Jesus Christ did exist, gathered disciples, and was crucified and went missing from the tomb. To argue about wether He was taken from the grave or rose from it, is an argument a skeptic can make. Because well if you disregard the eye witness testimony of the disciples and there willingness to die for Christ, and humans won’t die for something they know is a lie, when Peter is pinned upside down to that cross, he could have said that it was a fake, but He didn’t because it wasn’t, what care would he have about death in this world if he knew for a fact he had assurance of a life in another, Jesus Christ did rise from the tomb and is the King of Kings and Lord of Lords. Now the evidence for the Lord Jesus Christ’s existence really isn’t hard to find a multitude of non-Christian scholars and historians mention Him within 150 years after the time of His life. One such is Tacitus a Roman historian who reported on emperor nero’s decision to blame the Christians for the fire that had destroyed rome in 64 AD. Tacitus wrote: “Nero fastened the guilt ... on a class hated for their abominations, called Christians by the populace. Christus, from whom the name had its origin, suffered the extreme penalty during the reign of Tiberius at the hands of ... Pontius Pilatus, and a most mischievous superstition, thus checked for the moment, again broke out not only in Judaea, the first source of the evil, but even in Rome…” In this Tacitus makes reference to not only Christians, but Christ calling Him Christus and confirming the Gospels going on to say that He suffered the extreme penalty (crucifixion) under the reign of Tiberius and by the sentence of Pontius Pilate, which like I said confirms the Gospels narrative. Another important source of evidence about Jesus and early Christianity can be found in the letters of Pliny the Younger to Emperor Trajan. Pliny was the Roman governor of Bithynia in Asia Minor. In one of his letters, dated around A.D. 112, he asks Trajan's advice about the appropriate way to conduct legal proceedings against those accused of being Christians. Pliny says that he needed to consult the emperor about this issue because a great multitude of every age, class, and sex stood accused of Christianity. At one point in his letter, Pliny relates some of the information he has learned about these Christians: “They were in the habit of meeting on a certain fixed day before it was light, when they sang in alternate verses a hymn to Christ, as to a god, and bound themselves by a solemn oath, not to any wicked deeds, but never to commit any fraud, theft or adultery, never to falsify their word, nor deny a trust when they should be called upon to deliver it up; after which it was their custom to separate, and then reassemble to partake of food - but food of an ordinary and innocent kind.” This passage provides a number of interesting insights into the beliefs and practices of early Christians. First, we see that Christians regularly met on a certain fixed day for worship. Second, their worship was directed to Christ, demonstrating that they firmly believed in His divinity. Furthermore, one scholar interprets Pliny's statement that hymns were sung to Christ, "as to a god", as a reference to the rather distinctive fact that, "unlike other gods who were worshipped, Christ was a person who had lived on earth." If this interpretation is correct, Pliny understood that Christians were worshipping an actual historical person as God! Of course, this agrees perfectly with the New Testament doctrine that Jesus was both God and man. You may have heard of the scholar Flavius Josephus who mentioned James as being the brother of the Lord Jesus Christ, which matches what Paul said calling James “The Lord’s brother” and there is another document that Josephus may have written which goes: “About this time there lived Jesus, a wise man, if indeed one ought to call him a man. For he ... wrought surprising feats.... He was the Christ. When Pilate ...condemned him to be crucified, those who had . . . come to love him did not give up their affection for him. On the third day he appeared ... restored to life.... And the tribe of Christians ... has ... not disappeared.” Now it’s up to debate wether this is the entirely original document of what Josephus wrote, or if a Christian had edited it. But regardless he wrote about the Lord Jesus Christ. Wether it was negative or positive like the possible document is. Anyways there are many other statements, documents, letters, and writings of all sorts from the ancient world talking about the Lord Jesus Christ and there is not one question if He was a real person or if He was crucified and went missing from the grave. That is clear as day, He is a real person, was crucified, and went missing from the grave. And He did rise from the grave. And for more evidence of the Lord Jesus Christ, there’s the Bible and you see there is no evidence the Bible is corrupted, a lie, created by the Roman government, folktale. It is the recount of the Disciples of the Lord Jesus Christ, now wether you want to believe it is up to you. And what profit was there in spreading Christianity, All the early Christian suffered persecution, beatings, and were killed. Another Scholar reported that James the Lord’s Brother was thrown off a building and then stoned to death for spreading the Gospel in Jerusalem. These people went to great lengths even giving their own lives for the Adon Jesus the Christ. Amen!!!!!!!
@@CelVini Repent of your sins and believe on the Adon Jesus the Christ, believe in your heart that He has died for sins and rose from the tomb on the third day and you shall receive the Holy Spirit of God and He shall dwell within you. You shall be saved. Be baptized in the name of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit! - Jesus the Christ loves you, praise YHWH our Elohim - Evidence for Jesus Christ’s existence, crucifixion, and disappearance from the tomb (He rose from it): The Lord Jesus Christ did exist, gathered disciples, and was crucified and went missing from the tomb. To argue about wether He was taken from the grave or rose from it, is an argument a skeptic can make. Because well if you disregard the eye witness testimony of the disciples and there willingness to die for Christ, and humans won’t die for something they know is a lie, when Peter is pinned upside down to that cross, he could have said that it was a fake, but He didn’t because it wasn’t, what care would he have about death in this world if he knew for a fact he had assurance of a life in another, Jesus Christ did rise from the tomb and is the King of Kings and Lord of Lords. Now the evidence for the Lord Jesus Christ’s existence really isn’t hard to find a multitude of non-Christian scholars and historians mention Him within 150 years after the time of His life. One such is Tacitus a Roman historian who reported on emperor nero’s decision to blame the Christians for the fire that had destroyed rome in 64 AD. Tacitus wrote: “Nero fastened the guilt ... on a class hated for their abominations, called Christians by the populace. Christus, from whom the name had its origin, suffered the extreme penalty during the reign of Tiberius at the hands of ... Pontius Pilatus, and a most mischievous superstition, thus checked for the moment, again broke out not only in Judaea, the first source of the evil, but even in Rome…” In this Tacitus makes reference to not only Christians, but Christ calling Him Christus and confirming the Gospels going on to say that He suffered the extreme penalty (crucifixion) under the reign of Tiberius and by the sentence of Pontius Pilate, which like I said confirms the Gospels narrative. Another important source of evidence about Jesus and early Christianity can be found in the letters of Pliny the Younger to Emperor Trajan. Pliny was the Roman governor of Bithynia in Asia Minor. In one of his letters, dated around A.D. 112, he asks Trajan's advice about the appropriate way to conduct legal proceedings against those accused of being Christians. Pliny says that he needed to consult the emperor about this issue because a great multitude of every age, class, and sex stood accused of Christianity. At one point in his letter, Pliny relates some of the information he has learned about these Christians: “They were in the habit of meeting on a certain fixed day before it was light, when they sang in alternate verses a hymn to Christ, as to a god, and bound themselves by a solemn oath, not to any wicked deeds, but never to commit any fraud, theft or adultery, never to falsify their word, nor deny a trust when they should be called upon to deliver it up; after which it was their custom to separate, and then reassemble to partake of food - but food of an ordinary and innocent kind.” This passage provides a number of interesting insights into the beliefs and practices of early Christians. First, we see that Christians regularly met on a certain fixed day for worship. Second, their worship was directed to Christ, demonstrating that they firmly believed in His divinity. Furthermore, one scholar interprets Pliny's statement that hymns were sung to Christ, "as to a god", as a reference to the rather distinctive fact that, "unlike other gods who were worshipped, Christ was a person who had lived on earth." If this interpretation is correct, Pliny understood that Christians were worshipping an actual historical person as God! Of course, this agrees perfectly with the New Testament doctrine that Jesus was both God and man. You may have heard of the scholar Flavius Josephus who mentioned James as being the brother of the Lord Jesus Christ, which matches what Paul said calling James “The Lord’s brother” and there is another document that Josephus may have written which goes: “About this time there lived Jesus, a wise man, if indeed one ought to call him a man. For he ... wrought surprising feats.... He was the Christ. When Pilate ...condemned him to be crucified, those who had . . . come to love him did not give up their affection for him. On the third day he appeared ... restored to life.... And the tribe of Christians ... has ... not disappeared.” Now it’s up to debate wether this is the entirely original document of what Josephus wrote, or if a Christian had edited it. But regardless he wrote about the Lord Jesus Christ. Wether it was negative or positive like the possible document is. Anyways there are many other statements, documents, letters, and writings of all sorts from the ancient world talking about the Lord Jesus Christ and there is not one question if He was a real person or if He was crucified and went missing from the grave. That is clear as day, He is a real person, was crucified, and went missing from the grave. And He did rise from the grave. And for more evidence of the Lord Jesus Christ, there’s the Bible and you see there is no evidence the Bible is corrupted, a lie, created by the Roman government, folktale. It is the recount of the Disciples of the Lord Jesus Christ, now wether you want to believe it is up to you. And what profit was there in spreading Christianity, All the early Christian suffered persecution, beatings, and were killed. Another Scholar reported that James the Lord’s Brother was thrown off a building and then stoned to death for spreading the Gospel in Jerusalem. These people went to great lengths even giving their own lives for the Adon Jesus the Christ. Amen!!!!!!!
I always loved how his power goes from distinct but different black and shining energy, but when he pushes for the attack, it blends unnaturally. It looks like murky water, something that mixed that isn’t supposed to, but just floats around him. It’s like everything merged for just a brief moment, before it vanishes completely.
Uraharas seal is still one of the hardest seals in anime ever. A strong person such as aizen struggling from certain imprisonment mad and raving about false ideals as he is turned into whatever the fuck and ichigo finding it too brutal still thus looking away
This is how Ichigo and uses the Final Getsuga Tenshou and defeats AizenGOD or at least makes him lower his powers to 0% to later be sealed and go to Seireitei, Master Bleach I can't wait for I know October to see a masterpiece and my favorite anime again 🖤❤️ Postscript: I love Ichigo Post Dangai and his Final Getsuga Tenshou 🧡🖤
No, this Ichigo, referred to as Dangai Ichigo, is how strong True Shikai Ichigo is Now, True Bankai Ichigo is stronger, which is what Yhwach was scared of.
@@Kevinblake223 True shikai with hos maybe is close to dangai,though i am not sure but true bankai is dangai level.True shikai is almost a fodder a bit more powerful than captain class opponents.His reiatsu was sensible after all.Mugetsu is still the strongest form even now.
How can you be the most quiet yet most loud person. Please don't add the girl on the top right anymore actually annoying to hear she doesn't stop whispering. I didn't come for asmr
"I don't trust guys who are out to 'save the world'. And I can't stand gung-ho fanatics. People like that are all about glory, and they're usually all talk. They SAY they can do anything, but when push comes to shove, they crumble. Do you know why? Because they're only out for themselves. It's an ego trip. That's why they have no stomach for REAL sacrifice." - Anna Kyoyama ("Shaman King") For all the flaws Hyroyuki Takei had, with his original run on the Shaman King, this is a quote that has always stuck with me, whenever someone like a Sosuke Aizen or a Light Yagami comes along. Characters who, motivated by nothing more than their own narcissism, believe it's their right to stand above everybody else, only to fall when their mouths write checks their asses can't cash. And yet, have you noticed, in nearly every one of those instances, the irony is that they don't actually KNOW what they would do with the authority they believe they're entitled to? I mean, for all his broad, sweeping declarations of what his intentions were throughout the series, Aizen never specifically laid out what his glorious revolution was going to lead to. I think it's because the thought never occurred to him. At the end of the day, all he really cared about was the prize. He never came up with a plan for what he was going to do if he ACTUALLY won. At least...that's just MY thinking on it.
Well, I've got news for YOU...that's pretty much the bog-standard refrain for EVERY fictional character with an ego..."I-KNOW-BETTER". And yet, every single time, they never reveal how they plan to MAKE things better...because again, all they care about is the prize.
@@MarkzBaui26 You mean Madara from Naruto? Well, Ywach's concern for how his schemes MIGHT benefit the world was a DISTANT second to his concern for how he KNEW they would benefit HIM. Anyone else he might have helped was strictly a fringe benefit, nothing more.
@@TuxedAaron yeah madara atleast wanted a world with no suffering and i havent read bleach manga so all i know about ywach was that he wants to unite all worlds but it seems that madara cares more since he doesnt want people in his world to die only to not suffer the real life and live in a dream life forever
@@MarkzBaui26 Well, I don't know enough about Madara to comment on what his intentions were. But in Ywach's case, his primary goal was to eliminate death in its entirety. Oh, he CLAIMED it was for everyone's benefit, but at the end of the day, he was really only out to help himself.
Why ichigo has to use his final getsuga tenshoo and lost his shinigami power even though he can defeat aizen without use it.. He risk all that just for one slash 😐😕 ..
I was so disappointed with this fight they hyped it up so much and it ended to quick that’s why Bleach fell off and they stopped animating it. It was one of my favorites from the big three but it did fall off and i read the manga and watched it since 2007.
They didn't stop animating it because it "fell off" there are many shows to this day that "fell off" and are still getting movies and additional sequels. The reason it wasn't animated at the time was because after Fullbring arc Kubo hadn't even made the next arc and Bleach is already almost half filler so it was a wise choice to stop production.
They didnt stop animating bcoz it fell of and it never did....fight was great keep crying....keep hating ... This isnt one piece or dragon ball the correct way to meld all the hype was to finish this fight in one episode
Try to watch solo leveling reactions. It was so annoying. Everyone coming up with theory about stuff that was literally explained 2 secs ago. The op mc brainrot not allowing them to comprehend that Jinwoo actually has to work to be strong. Every single fight their like “check your inventory” hoping some random deity was gonna give him a +1m sword. Or when he admitted someone was strong they’re like “he’s just humble”. Or when he fought a D class boss they were like “I thought that was S”. So infuriating that they cannot appreciate the story. Jinwoo is op but it’s not like train for 1 episode now I’m omnipotent, and that’s what they expected.
It was the highest respect. Ichigo is famous for his very honorable attitude towards his opponent. He wanted Ulquiorra to cut off his limbs so that the fight was fair. Now he attacked Aizen with the strongest attack that took away his powers. What a dedication. This, of course, is one look at the matter. Another reason is simply to create a fullbring arc that will lead to the final arc. Any interpretation. Manga makers love to do this. Sometimes it gets frustrating and you want answers right away. And sometimes it's great. How is it in this case? Everyone will have an opinion.
Dangai Ichigo coulden't defeat Aizen
@@CelVini but he didnt even need to. the goal was to pressure Aizen enough , although he didnt know that.
I believe there is no such a form to defeat Aizen with Kyoka Suigetsu , only some tricks like special Kido could defeat him.
the master mind Urahara + Dangai strength > Aizen
@@sioframei Well, Dangai wasen't enough to completely make Aizen vunerable, he would just keep evolving and Ichigo knew it. It was necessary, Aizen said he would become God, no way Ichigo could keep up while Aizen evolves as much as he needs to
Repent of your sins and believe on the Adon Jesus the Christ, believe in your heart that He has died for sins and rose from the tomb on the third day and you shall receive the Holy Spirit of God and He shall dwell within you. You shall be saved. Be baptized in the name of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit!
-
Jesus the Christ loves you, praise YHWH our Elohim
-
Evidence for Jesus Christ’s existence, crucifixion, and disappearance from the tomb (He rose from it):
The Lord Jesus Christ did exist, gathered disciples, and was crucified and went missing from the tomb. To argue about wether He was taken from the grave or rose from it, is an argument a skeptic can make. Because well if you disregard the eye witness testimony of the disciples and there willingness to die for Christ, and humans won’t die for something they know is a lie, when Peter is pinned upside down to that cross, he could have said that it was a fake, but He didn’t because it wasn’t, what care would he have about death in this world if he knew for a fact he had assurance of a life in another, Jesus Christ did rise from the tomb and is the King of Kings and Lord of Lords. Now the evidence for the Lord Jesus Christ’s existence really isn’t hard to find a multitude of non-Christian scholars and historians mention Him within 150 years after the time of His life. One such is Tacitus a Roman historian who reported on emperor nero’s decision to blame the Christians for the fire that had destroyed rome in 64 AD. Tacitus wrote:
“Nero fastened the guilt ... on a class hated for their abominations, called Christians by the populace. Christus, from whom the name had its origin, suffered the extreme penalty during the reign of Tiberius at the hands of ... Pontius Pilatus, and a most mischievous superstition, thus checked for the moment, again broke out not only in Judaea, the first source of the evil, but even in Rome…”
In this Tacitus makes reference to not only Christians, but Christ calling Him Christus and confirming the Gospels going on to say that He suffered the extreme penalty (crucifixion) under the reign of Tiberius and by the sentence of Pontius Pilate, which like I said confirms the Gospels narrative.
Another important source of evidence about Jesus and early Christianity can be found in the letters of Pliny the Younger to Emperor Trajan. Pliny was the Roman governor of Bithynia in Asia Minor. In one of his letters, dated around A.D. 112, he asks Trajan's advice about the appropriate way to conduct legal proceedings against those accused of being Christians. Pliny says that he needed to consult the emperor about this issue because a great multitude of every age, class, and sex stood accused of Christianity. At one point in his letter, Pliny relates some of the information he has learned about these Christians:
“They were in the habit of meeting on a certain fixed day before it was light, when they sang in alternate verses a hymn to Christ, as to a god, and bound themselves by a solemn oath, not to any wicked deeds, but never to commit any fraud, theft or adultery, never to falsify their word, nor deny a trust when they should be called upon to deliver it up; after which it was their custom to separate, and then reassemble to partake of food - but food of an ordinary and innocent kind.”
This passage provides a number of interesting insights into the beliefs and practices of early Christians. First, we see that Christians regularly met on a certain fixed day for worship. Second, their worship was directed to Christ, demonstrating that they firmly believed in His divinity. Furthermore, one scholar interprets Pliny's statement that hymns were sung to Christ, "as to a god", as a reference to the rather distinctive fact that, "unlike other gods who were worshipped, Christ was a person who had lived on earth." If this interpretation is correct, Pliny understood that Christians were worshipping an actual historical person as God! Of course, this agrees perfectly with the New Testament doctrine that Jesus was both God and man.
You may have heard of the scholar Flavius Josephus who mentioned James as being the brother of the Lord Jesus Christ, which matches what Paul said calling James “The Lord’s brother” and there is another document that Josephus may have written which goes:
“About this time there lived Jesus, a wise man, if indeed one ought to call him a man. For he ... wrought surprising feats.... He was the Christ. When Pilate ...condemned him to be crucified, those who had . . . come to love him did not give up their affection for him. On the third day he appeared ... restored to life.... And the tribe of Christians ... has ... not disappeared.”
Now it’s up to debate wether this is the entirely original document of what Josephus wrote, or if a Christian had edited it. But regardless he wrote about the Lord Jesus Christ. Wether it was negative or positive like the possible document is. Anyways there are many other statements, documents, letters, and writings of all sorts from the ancient world talking about the Lord Jesus Christ and there is not one question if He was a real person or if He was crucified and went missing from the grave. That is clear as day, He is a real person, was crucified, and went missing from the grave. And He did rise from the grave. And for more evidence of the Lord Jesus Christ, there’s the Bible and you see there is no evidence the Bible is corrupted, a lie, created by the Roman government, folktale. It is the recount of the Disciples of the Lord Jesus Christ, now wether you want to believe it is up to you. And what profit was there in spreading Christianity, All the early Christian suffered persecution, beatings, and were killed. Another Scholar reported that James the Lord’s Brother was thrown off a building and then stoned to death for spreading the Gospel in Jerusalem. These people went to great lengths even giving their own lives for the Adon Jesus the Christ.
Amen!!!!!!!
@@CelVini Repent of your sins and believe on the Adon Jesus the Christ, believe in your heart that He has died for sins and rose from the tomb on the third day and you shall receive the Holy Spirit of God and He shall dwell within you. You shall be saved. Be baptized in the name of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit!
-
Jesus the Christ loves you, praise YHWH our Elohim
-
Evidence for Jesus Christ’s existence, crucifixion, and disappearance from the tomb (He rose from it):
The Lord Jesus Christ did exist, gathered disciples, and was crucified and went missing from the tomb. To argue about wether He was taken from the grave or rose from it, is an argument a skeptic can make. Because well if you disregard the eye witness testimony of the disciples and there willingness to die for Christ, and humans won’t die for something they know is a lie, when Peter is pinned upside down to that cross, he could have said that it was a fake, but He didn’t because it wasn’t, what care would he have about death in this world if he knew for a fact he had assurance of a life in another, Jesus Christ did rise from the tomb and is the King of Kings and Lord of Lords. Now the evidence for the Lord Jesus Christ’s existence really isn’t hard to find a multitude of non-Christian scholars and historians mention Him within 150 years after the time of His life. One such is Tacitus a Roman historian who reported on emperor nero’s decision to blame the Christians for the fire that had destroyed rome in 64 AD. Tacitus wrote:
“Nero fastened the guilt ... on a class hated for their abominations, called Christians by the populace. Christus, from whom the name had its origin, suffered the extreme penalty during the reign of Tiberius at the hands of ... Pontius Pilatus, and a most mischievous superstition, thus checked for the moment, again broke out not only in Judaea, the first source of the evil, but even in Rome…”
In this Tacitus makes reference to not only Christians, but Christ calling Him Christus and confirming the Gospels going on to say that He suffered the extreme penalty (crucifixion) under the reign of Tiberius and by the sentence of Pontius Pilate, which like I said confirms the Gospels narrative.
Another important source of evidence about Jesus and early Christianity can be found in the letters of Pliny the Younger to Emperor Trajan. Pliny was the Roman governor of Bithynia in Asia Minor. In one of his letters, dated around A.D. 112, he asks Trajan's advice about the appropriate way to conduct legal proceedings against those accused of being Christians. Pliny says that he needed to consult the emperor about this issue because a great multitude of every age, class, and sex stood accused of Christianity. At one point in his letter, Pliny relates some of the information he has learned about these Christians:
“They were in the habit of meeting on a certain fixed day before it was light, when they sang in alternate verses a hymn to Christ, as to a god, and bound themselves by a solemn oath, not to any wicked deeds, but never to commit any fraud, theft or adultery, never to falsify their word, nor deny a trust when they should be called upon to deliver it up; after which it was their custom to separate, and then reassemble to partake of food - but food of an ordinary and innocent kind.”
This passage provides a number of interesting insights into the beliefs and practices of early Christians. First, we see that Christians regularly met on a certain fixed day for worship. Second, their worship was directed to Christ, demonstrating that they firmly believed in His divinity. Furthermore, one scholar interprets Pliny's statement that hymns were sung to Christ, "as to a god", as a reference to the rather distinctive fact that, "unlike other gods who were worshipped, Christ was a person who had lived on earth." If this interpretation is correct, Pliny understood that Christians were worshipping an actual historical person as God! Of course, this agrees perfectly with the New Testament doctrine that Jesus was both God and man.
You may have heard of the scholar Flavius Josephus who mentioned James as being the brother of the Lord Jesus Christ, which matches what Paul said calling James “The Lord’s brother” and there is another document that Josephus may have written which goes:
“About this time there lived Jesus, a wise man, if indeed one ought to call him a man. For he ... wrought surprising feats.... He was the Christ. When Pilate ...condemned him to be crucified, those who had . . . come to love him did not give up their affection for him. On the third day he appeared ... restored to life.... And the tribe of Christians ... has ... not disappeared.”
Now it’s up to debate wether this is the entirely original document of what Josephus wrote, or if a Christian had edited it. But regardless he wrote about the Lord Jesus Christ. Wether it was negative or positive like the possible document is. Anyways there are many other statements, documents, letters, and writings of all sorts from the ancient world talking about the Lord Jesus Christ and there is not one question if He was a real person or if He was crucified and went missing from the grave. That is clear as day, He is a real person, was crucified, and went missing from the grave. And He did rise from the grave. And for more evidence of the Lord Jesus Christ, there’s the Bible and you see there is no evidence the Bible is corrupted, a lie, created by the Roman government, folktale. It is the recount of the Disciples of the Lord Jesus Christ, now wether you want to believe it is up to you. And what profit was there in spreading Christianity, All the early Christian suffered persecution, beatings, and were killed. Another Scholar reported that James the Lord’s Brother was thrown off a building and then stoned to death for spreading the Gospel in Jerusalem. These people went to great lengths even giving their own lives for the Adon Jesus the Christ.
Amen!!!!!!!
Keep uploading this masterpiece🔥
I always loved how his power goes from distinct but different black and shining energy, but when he pushes for the attack, it blends unnaturally. It looks like murky water, something that mixed that isn’t supposed to, but just floats around him. It’s like everything merged for just a brief moment, before it vanishes completely.
I love this man keep it up Grimmjow vs ichigo next maybe? No rush just asking
ok bro thanks for recommending
Aizen is so broken..Ywachi even is wary of him. Lol
Ichigo vs Aizen
Winner: Urahara
And that is why Urahara is probably the most dangerous man in Soul Society.
Let's keep it real if it wasn't for Ichigo they'd never have brought Aizen down to that level
Ahh man realized Urahara is that guys who uses teamates to do his score lmao
Uraharas seal is still one of the hardest seals in anime ever.
A strong person such as aizen struggling from certain imprisonment mad and raving about false ideals as he is turned into whatever the fuck and ichigo finding it too brutal still thus looking away
Bro urahara with prep time is a diff gravy
Até o Duo Animes React ali tmb. KKKKKKK Que massa
Né man ksksks
Best transformation 🔥
13:59 What happen to Gin??
☠️
Nah he really turned Aizen into Iron Throne from Game of Thrones
This is how Ichigo and uses the Final Getsuga Tenshou and defeats AizenGOD or at least makes him lower his powers to 0% to later be sealed and go to Seireitei, Master Bleach I can't wait for I know October to see a masterpiece and my favorite anime again 🖤❤️
Postscript: I love Ichigo Post Dangai and his Final Getsuga Tenshou 🧡🖤
thanks!
If you can please do more but take all the time you need
Thanks I love bleach
We have 2 of the war types going at it
13:33 Ichigo is so sad
This is a nerfed ichigo, people who did read the manga knows.
Full Power ichigo scared even yhwach who is fully aweakend and absorbed the Soul king.
No, this Ichigo, referred to as Dangai Ichigo, is how strong True Shikai Ichigo is
Now, True Bankai Ichigo is stronger, which is what Yhwach was scared of.
@@aether610 true shikai is stronger than dangai
@@aether610 and true zanpakuto ichigo who trains in dangai mid diffs sk ywach
@@aether610 true shikai is equal or stronger than mugetsu
@@Kevinblake223 True shikai with hos maybe is close to dangai,though i am not sure but true bankai is dangai level.True shikai is almost a fodder a bit more powerful than captain class opponents.His reiatsu was sensible after all.Mugetsu is still the strongest form even now.
Ichigo vs Aizen
Winner - Kizuke Urahara
Ichigo is become zangetsu himself
Imagine if true dangai ichigo exist
If you're going to make the video nearly impossible to see least leave us audio, or use the subbed version. Give us something!
Madara saved the day.
They had seal him not kill him thats what makes aizen more op because of his hax 😂
Aizen owns the 2 of the Best OP weapons in Anime History. ( Kyoka Suigetsu and and the Hogyoku )
@@jhomsubiaga-cabaro5715yhwach enters chat 💀
@@yashmehta4087 true
Cool!
Chick in the top right corner doesn't understand how reacting works, she talked over everything.
Vietnam flashbacks
If he would've done this to anyone else they would be dead for sure
They would be way more than dead
Except maybe ywatch
The hokyoku idk spelling, is what kept him alive. And ywatch are the only people who could survive being hit by this
@@MistressCheese he's dead and Aizen still alive and didn't even shown his Bankai + he's only getting stronger as time goes by. Aizen>Yhwach
the crazy thing is this is equal to ichigos true shikai so that means ichigo can spam mugetsu 😂😂😂
Imagine it's not even his full power
Aizen is so OP that even at the end without him ichigo couldn't have won againts Yhwach
damn why not kubo" make this ichigo form of a body guard of soul king
that would have been more awsome
still cant belive Aizen actually won .
Ichigo coldest form
o cara faz um react o tempo inteiro entediado , o br de oculos, nem deveria fazer se nao gosta kkk
1시 방향은 정지화면인줄 알았다.
Music end???
Not to start shit but can Luffy or Naruto tank Aizens nuke attack?
How can you be the most quiet yet most loud person. Please don't add the girl on the top right anymore actually annoying to hear she doesn't stop whispering. I didn't come for asmr
"I don't trust guys who are out to 'save the world'. And I can't stand gung-ho fanatics.
People like that are all about glory, and they're usually all talk.
They SAY they can do anything, but when push comes to shove, they crumble.
Do you know why?
Because they're only out for themselves. It's an ego trip. That's why they have no stomach for REAL sacrifice."
- Anna Kyoyama ("Shaman King")
For all the flaws Hyroyuki Takei had, with his original run on the Shaman King, this is a quote that has always stuck with me, whenever someone like a Sosuke Aizen or a Light Yagami comes along. Characters who, motivated by nothing more than their own narcissism, believe it's their right to stand above everybody else, only to fall when their mouths write checks their asses can't cash.
And yet, have you noticed, in nearly every one of those instances, the irony is that they don't actually KNOW what they would do with the authority they believe they're entitled to? I mean, for all his broad, sweeping declarations of what his intentions were throughout the series, Aizen never specifically laid out what his glorious revolution was going to lead to. I think it's because the thought never occurred to him. At the end of the day, all he really cared about was the prize. He never came up with a plan for what he was going to do if he ACTUALLY won.
At least...that's just MY thinking on it.
Well, I've got news for YOU...that's pretty much the bog-standard refrain for EVERY fictional character with an ego..."I-KNOW-BETTER". And yet, every single time, they never reveal how they plan to MAKE things better...because again, all they care about is the prize.
@@TuxedAaron atleast ywach and madara genuinely cared about their worlds even though the methods are fcked up
@@MarkzBaui26 You mean Madara from Naruto?
Well, Ywach's concern for how his schemes MIGHT benefit the world was a DISTANT second to his concern for how he KNEW they would benefit HIM. Anyone else he might have helped was strictly a fringe benefit, nothing more.
@@TuxedAaron yeah madara atleast wanted a world with no suffering and i havent read bleach manga so all i know about ywach was that he wants to unite all worlds but it seems that madara cares more since he doesnt want people in his world to die only to not suffer the real life and live in a dream life forever
@@MarkzBaui26 Well, I don't know enough about Madara to comment on what his intentions were. But in Ywach's case, his primary goal was to eliminate death in its entirety. Oh, he CLAIMED it was for everyone's benefit, but at the end of the day, he was really only out to help himself.
Até brasileiro tem kkkkkkk
Yama vs aizen
อีเสื้อดําเค้าจะพูดส้นตีนอะไรนักหนา
The girl on glasses stop whispering
Eps?
309
The same ASMR chick thinking we want her thinking over her reactions : here we go again
Bruh 🤢
That girl doing some ASMR thing is annoying
Hate the commentory of that beanie girl
Caramba, esses BR são muito chatos, cara.
Mid
Ur mid
I am
@@mailugan921better than the garbage that you likes
@@mailugan921 stfu...stop calling everything mid .....
Why ichigo has to use his final getsuga tenshoo and lost his shinigami power even though he can defeat aizen without use it.. He risk all that just for one slash 😐😕 ..
I was so disappointed with this fight they hyped it up so much and it ended to quick that’s why Bleach fell off and they stopped animating it. It was one of my favorites from the big three but it did fall off and i read the manga and watched it since 2007.
Tf??? How were you disappointed, that’s such an L opinion
They didn't stop animating it because it "fell off" there are many shows to this day that "fell off" and are still getting movies and additional sequels. The reason it wasn't animated at the time was because after Fullbring arc Kubo hadn't even made the next arc and Bleach is already almost half filler so it was a wise choice to stop production.
They didnt stop animating bcoz it fell of and it never did....fight was great keep crying....keep hating ...
This isnt one piece or dragon ball the correct way to meld all the hype was to finish this fight in one episode
this comment did not age well
I thoroughly comprehend just how unintelligent anime reactors truly are.
Try to watch solo leveling reactions. It was so annoying. Everyone coming up with theory about stuff that was literally explained 2 secs ago. The op mc brainrot not allowing them to comprehend that Jinwoo actually has to work to be strong. Every single fight their like “check your inventory” hoping some random deity was gonna give him a +1m sword. Or when he admitted someone was strong they’re like “he’s just humble”. Or when he fought a D class boss they were like “I thought that was S”. So infuriating that they cannot appreciate the story. Jinwoo is op but it’s not like train for 1 episode now I’m omnipotent, and that’s what they expected.
So True buddy 🤣