Ford Ranger 2021 review: Towing test in the FX4 Max - Is it a better alternative to a Raptor?

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 2 лис 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 67

  • @351tgv
    @351tgv 3 роки тому +7

    good review Matt, the only thing I do not like is the awful "manual shift switch" who ever came up with that idea should be fired ASAP, when ever I drive a Ranger / Everest with the 10speed auto it's the one thing that upsets the entire package, at least provide what the 3.2L with 6-speed auto has which is a proper sequential shift gate (pull to up-shift / push to down-sift) or at the very least steering wheel mounted paddle shifters, oh while they are at it a proper "Sports" mode for the transmission would be nice, yes I know some will say but hey it's a ute and does not need these things but the reality is that if you do long distance driving then you need to be able to control the gears since ford can't be bothered to offer a real "manual" with this particular engine and as such being able to quickly lock out 10, 9 and 8 and just use the 1 through 6 and 7th as the over-driver gear will greatly improve your driving experience.

  • @351tgv
    @351tgv 3 роки тому +4

    Ranger Raptor or Ranger Tremor oops I mean FX4 MAX? I used to used to do long distance towing with a Ford Everest and the issue with the "live axle watts link coil spring rear suspension" is being able to adjust the load level correctly to avoid rear end suspension sag which affects stability at high speeds since you really can't use load level bars on coil suspensions (due to the trailing arms) which is why the Ranger Raptor is not really suitable for HD towing (backstory: Ford have known this since 1982 which is why the Falcon wagon and Falcon UTE continued with leaf springs) + combined with the trick Fox Shocks set up so the Tremor oops I mean FX4 Max with leaf springs makes sense however Ford have provided Fox Shocks (not the same size or spec though) all round to give off road ability (both low and high speeds) so it's a compromise vehicle which suites me fine if I were still doing long distance towing and off road work, that said I would of really preferred the 2.0L sequential turbo to be offered with 6-speed manual but Ford clearly know better.

  • @jaykazama9132
    @jaykazama9132 3 роки тому +7

    Fills the gap between the XLT and Raptor...? Wildtrak?

    • @craigpodsprojames2500
      @craigpodsprojames2500 3 роки тому +1

      I was thinking the same thing

    • @MattyVidler
      @MattyVidler 3 роки тому +1

      Wildtrak is an xlt with a few extra features. Both Wildtrak and Xlt utes are made for a market that want to take the kids to soccer and maybe tow a van and a bit of light off-roading and never put a tool in it. Let’s be honest a lot of office jockeys use these utes and never get off the bitumen. Raptor was made for off-road, springs all round, fox suspension. They’re filling this gap with with the FX4 Max with it having higher vehicle clearance, more aggressive tires and better suspension. Plus the towing in the Raptor is 2500kg which has made it less desirable to a lot of the market. This has 3500kg

    • @jaykazama9132
      @jaykazama9132 3 роки тому

      @@MattyVidler So the gap is the Wildtrak?

  • @ausguy4385
    @ausguy4385 3 роки тому +1

    Add a scan gauge what temp were you cooking the trans with? No off road? Do it in sand or up hill it's cooked in no time.

  • @djp4nfa
    @djp4nfa 3 роки тому +2

    Love the FX4max. Would love this, willing to wait for the next ranger with the 6cly tdi

  • @ferdiepapa9044
    @ferdiepapa9044 3 роки тому

    Without any load/tow, would you say its more comfortable on the city than other Rangers Wildtrak included?

  • @IamSomeDude22
    @IamSomeDude22 2 роки тому

    Hey boys, can you do a video of a RAPTOR towing 2tonne - So many of us would like to know what it's like towing a 2t camper.

  • @keretiwiniata5137
    @keretiwiniata5137 3 роки тому +1

    Just buy a cheap 3.2L and purchase the new high flow upgrade they got for them now. Probably save u about 15K maybe even more🤷‍♂️ And i see ultamate tune have uploaded a new vid of a wildtrak 3.2L with the upgrade pushing 500+kw at the wheels at low stress aswell. Just saying cheers👍

  • @mvnorsel6354
    @mvnorsel6354 3 роки тому +10

    It seems cruel to burden such a small engine with such a load.

    • @billgates3452
      @billgates3452 3 роки тому +3

      Capacity has a limited amount to do with the “strength” of an engine. A team of many engineers developed this engine with the specific idea of a commercial application in mind (think Transit) and it will be fine both short and long term. Thermal efficiency and block compound & design technology has come along way from the old days of “no replacement for displacement”.
      Sure I’d prefer the sound of a diesel V8 in a ranger but there would be compromises wouldn’t there? Hold out for the T7 ranger and you’ll get some options (as long as you have deep pockets).

    • @craigdavid6668
      @craigdavid6668 3 роки тому

      @@billgates3452 Or buy a 200......

    • @billgates3452
      @billgates3452 3 роки тому

      @@craigdavid6668 lol on everyone’s wish list at them moment as all the new ones are gone, but yes I would love a V8 cruiser. Like I said though there would be compromises.

  • @panos8444
    @panos8444 3 роки тому +6

    2 litre wound right up with 29psi from the turbo wringing its head of just to over power the 3.2 litre 19psi.
    Highly stressed motor. Wait for the experiment with other peoples money to start dropping off once the kms rake up

    • @kahuna1247
      @kahuna1247 3 роки тому +4

      How is it stressed if the 10 speed gearbox keeps the revs down?

    • @billgates3452
      @billgates3452 3 роки тому +6

      20 years ago 10psi was a lot, 10 years ago 19psi was a lot, today 29psi is a lot...block compounds & engine component design is constantly improving. Get with the times.

    • @jamaicasysbm2580
      @jamaicasysbm2580 3 роки тому

      Facts

    • @jamaicasysbm2580
      @jamaicasysbm2580 3 роки тому

      @@billgates3452 Facts

    • @jamesplatt9323
      @jamesplatt9323 3 роки тому +1

      Km are are going up. You need to look at the design of this motor. It's not stressed and can make 270hp at the wheels when tuned with the DPF removed.

  • @billyemmons9337
    @billyemmons9337 3 роки тому +1

    Im sorry im a truck man but they want to much for trucks anymore. I just purchased a 2021 Outlander for 18k and a trailer for 1600 it will do all i need.

  • @craigpodsprojames2500
    @craigpodsprojames2500 3 роки тому +7

    NEVER tow more than 3000kg behind one of these, or any dual-cab.

    • @nathanverdich7527
      @nathanverdich7527 3 роки тому

      Yes actually 2.5 ton is the limit unless it's a 79 series

    • @jensfos
      @jensfos 3 роки тому

      Why? It can happily tow 3500kg? I towed about that with a 2011 Land Cruiser 150 3.0 diesel. Worked fine.

    • @craigpodsprojames2500
      @craigpodsprojames2500 3 роки тому

      @@jensfos that's a LandCruiser.

  • @nathanmillard2510
    @nathanmillard2510 3 роки тому +2

    When doing a towing test it should be max wight 3.5 ton to see how it really preform

    • @mekhifinn6187
      @mekhifinn6187 3 роки тому

      i know I'm kind of off topic but does anybody know a good site to watch new series online ?

    • @magnushudson2342
      @magnushudson2342 3 роки тому

      @Mekhi Finn Try Flixzone. Just google for it =)

  • @patfromozZ
    @patfromozZ 3 роки тому +1

    They should offer a diesel V6 and stop mucking around! 2.0L is not a lot of motor for that weight and if it appears sufficiently powered then how stressed is it and how is it going to handle long term?

    • @tmfrs2
      @tmfrs2 3 роки тому

      Same way a Ford transit does, they share the same engine

    • @351tgv
      @351tgv 3 роки тому

      @@tmfrs2 not exactly the same engine, the Transit does not have sequential with by-pass valve turbo set up, look to South Africa wit there version of Ranger, they have the 2L with the VGT (variable geometry) turbo set up which has 140kW and 400Nm and it does the same job.

    • @michaelroditis7300
      @michaelroditis7300 3 роки тому

      @@351tgv not necessarily. We (South Africa) still get the 157kW 500Nm version of the 2.0L biturbo engine. So far there have been no complaints about the engine, but the gearbox...

    • @lukidgolf
      @lukidgolf 3 роки тому

      @@michaelroditis7300 whats wrong with gear boxes?

  • @christhomas4260
    @christhomas4260 3 роки тому

    The sticker kit is nice !!

  • @budgiesmuggler4638
    @budgiesmuggler4638 3 роки тому +3

    i dont like the side decals........ but thats pretty insignificant

  • @davidbrehm2611
    @davidbrehm2611 3 роки тому +1

    Why would you compare this to the Raptor? Completely different vehicles for a completely different user. This is built for towing/tradies, while the Raptor is built for fast offroad fun. Workhorse vs weekend weapon. Nobody buys a Raptor for heavy towing or payloads - these capabilities were sacrificed for an improved offroad experience.

  • @iainf2850
    @iainf2850 3 роки тому

    In the trade we call little engines working really hard' whiz bangs' -whiiizzz BANG-
    The single tube shocks of any brand are no good off road as once you get a small dent in the outside tube, throw away and buy new ones.
    The Monroe/OME twin tube ones work well and last the distance. I ran a workshop at the top of Cape York and repaced many many more expensive shocks which failed and usually tore the mounts off the car. Weld him back up and fit OMEs and get calls in 12 months time thanking me.
    That's enough proof for me.

  • @sefisredtv8991
    @sefisredtv8991 2 роки тому

    Whats the dial on 1:31?

  • @tonygersbach375
    @tonygersbach375 3 роки тому +1

    That's pretty good fuel economy for 2.3 tonnes

  • @jamaicasysbm2580
    @jamaicasysbm2580 3 роки тому +2

    Nice truck but I can’t afford it

  • @Deatomizer
    @Deatomizer 3 роки тому +2

    Raptor please!

    • @panos8444
      @panos8444 3 роки тому

      Tiny 2 litre

    • @Deatomizer
      @Deatomizer 3 роки тому +1

      @@panos8444 still kicks ars

  • @teclo4
    @teclo4 3 роки тому

    color?

  • @calumrife
    @calumrife 3 роки тому

    Cool tech, but new trucks have such tiny beds. Why even own a truck with a bed shorter than 6 ft? So dumb to me.

  • @Cous1nJack
    @Cous1nJack 3 роки тому

    Those safety chains are too long

  • @golong1343
    @golong1343 3 роки тому

    The fact that its transmission sucks for being confused on which gear to drive is a downer.

    • @Cous1nJack
      @Cous1nJack 3 роки тому

      It’s got too many to chose from.

  • @celticpridedrums
    @celticpridedrums 2 роки тому

    go up a long steep hill for a few miles--then tell me about towing.

  • @RemusKingOfRome
    @RemusKingOfRome 3 роки тому +2

    ..and I thought I paid too much of $50,000 for a new GXL Prado in 2005 .. Inflation is just a criminal joke.

    • @StephenFogarty2023
      @StephenFogarty2023 3 роки тому

      2005
      That was 16 years ago !
      Things change
      And these vehicles now are much better to what u bought new in 2005.
      And, so much more safety technology
      A 2005 vehicle would have some airbags, and not much else.

    • @RemusKingOfRome
      @RemusKingOfRome 3 роки тому

      @@StephenFogarty2023 new tech is cheap,and getting cheaper. doesn't justify 5,000 price hikes

  • @craigdavid6668
    @craigdavid6668 3 роки тому +2

    As soon as I see this many “read more” in the comment section I piss right off.

  • @nithishjvj8736
    @nithishjvj8736 3 роки тому

    Leaf springs in a $65000 truck
    ✌️

    • @keretiwiniata5137
      @keretiwiniata5137 3 роки тому

      🤣🤣exactly bro. Should be air bags or something along those lines. Get with the times ford. Maybe even wings for something at that price🤣

  • @sepic13
    @sepic13 3 роки тому +5

    66k for this 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣. F off for 2L

  • @phornsomeourt3448
    @phornsomeourt3448 3 роки тому

    Really like this truck somuch😘 ( but)😪

  • @bestiesforever180
    @bestiesforever180 3 роки тому

    Prefer fx4max

  • @юрийволович-о3д
    @юрийволович-о3д 3 роки тому

    Отлично !

  • @unknownskyman2156
    @unknownskyman2156 3 роки тому +2

    Another overpriced and underpowered shitbox....

    • @hotrod7603
      @hotrod7603 3 роки тому +1

      Underpowered and Overpriced $h*tbox goes for garbage hilux not For Ranger 😉