Behringer UMC404HD Review (audio performance tested and compared)
Вставка
- Опубліковано 26 чер 2024
- In this video we will find out about the audio performance of the Behringer UMC404HD.
Sweetwater US | Behringer UMC404HD: sweetwater.sjv.io/B0eD6q *
Thomann EU | Behringer UMC404HD: www.thomann.de/de/behringer_u... *
Amazon | Behringer UMC404HD: amzn.to/3nbHRjB *
Amazon | Behringer UMC404HD: amzn.to/3pbc4S6 *
Support future videos on Patreon: / juliankrause **
Follow me on Twitter: / thejuliankrause
00:00 - Intro
00:15 - Hardware Overview
03:34 - Output Configiration
04:59 - Internals
05:32 - Mic Input Performance
07:25 - Mic Preamp Performance
08:45 - Mic Input Dynamic Range
09:18 - Line Input Performance
10:28 - Insert vs Line Input Performance
10:59 - Main Output Performance
12:53 - Playback Output Performance
13:30 - HP Output Performance
14:58 - Round Trip Latency
15:40 - Verdict
* Affiliate links from which I receive a commission for sales. This doesn't generate any additional cost for you. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
** Patreon is a platform where you can voluntarily choose to support the channel by purchasing a monthly subscription. - Навчання та стиль
![[Eng Sub] Behringer UMC404HD audio interface](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/wL0-wjr3ynk/mqdefault.jpg)
I love German reviews, zero mumbo-jumbo bullshit, all numbers and measures, technically literate and objective. Brilliant video! 🙂👍🖖
Right!?!?!?!
cringe
Kraftwerk speech style 🙂
@@peterchoe how is that cringe do you have a problem with clear cut info
@@brainboyandthefunkybunch6516
I have a problem with the racialized glorification of a country when it has no pertinence to the quality of data being discussed. That's what's cringe. Are germans all somehow a homogeneous intellectual body?
This channel makes audio interface shopping easy.
Did you get it? How did you like it?!
The fact, that the headphone output shows distortion at higher settings is not because of a bad construction, it is fully intentional. The potentiometer is layed out to overdrive the amplifier. When you hear music with 0 dB maximum volume over USB, then the volume setting on the headphone output is intended to be set around 12 o'clock. The additional volume is intended for direct monitoring while recording. Here you set the inputs so, that your DAW get's a signal around -12 dB. If the headphone's output maximum setting was at 0 dB, the headphone volume would be much too low for a decent monitor signal. With this overdrive function you can crank it up to a comfortable monitor volume without any distortion. Perfect! Not many interfaces have this. I would also mention, that the so-called main output is only relevant, when you want to amplify the direct monitoring signal to your speakers. If you do not need this, use the playback outputs to connect the interface to your equipment. I use a regular consumer grade integrated amplifier and connect both the playback and the main output to it, so that i can switch between them and in this case the consumer output level the interface delivers fits perfectly. And it is not correct, that output A plays the same signal as output B. You can choose in your application or in your OS, which of the outputs 1/2 or 3/4 you want to use for playback, so that with the right settings both outputs can play different signals at the same time. For instance in DJ software for playback of two decks connected to an external mixer or one stereo output for the main signal and the other for the PFL signal to use the application's internal mixer. The monitor A/B switch at the front toggles the headphone signal between these outputs, which is exactly the function needed for this purpose. DJs should also check out the cheaper UMC204HD with only two inputs and the same 4 outputs, monitoring section and MIDI interface as in the 404.
I just want to say that your reviews are easily the best on the internet. You keep everything objective and measureable, and you avoid common myths and focus on the stuff that actually matters. Very much appreciated.
Also, I currently use the UMC1820. I don't know if you are planning on reviewing that one, but I'm curious to know how mine compares to the other models because it looks like the 404 suffers a few problems that the 202 doesn't. Thank you for your work!
Rates within the best informative and technically rich review videos I've seen on UA-cam. All tech with the data to prove and real testing. No opinion based recommendations. Recommendations based on real tests and comparison with other units is extremely useful. You are helping me make well informed decisions on some important purchases. Thank you!
I've had this unit for a few years now, searched for answers on certain aspects of it with no good result, you just changed that! thanks so much for a clear and professional review, I learned a lot, for one, I'm using the wrong input to my monitors well done! thanks, Clive.
Thanks a lot, Julian, I'm going to hear that presonus self-noise ringing in my ears all day! :)
Great review, thank you. I bought this after gifting the Behringer UMC22 to a friend and was so impressed by that little model, I got this version. The latency and sound quality are fantastic. Low noise and if you record at the correct level, I challenge you to find the difference between a converter at this price, and a converter worth 5* as much. I know I couldn't, and so my custom converters have been sold. This thing is a little gem.
Best review of this interface so far. I have the UMC404 HD and I'm very happy with it.
That is an incredible analysis. Extremely useful. Thank you!
This is my favourite channel on the web! Numbers, measures, and all the technical data that all the brands never have! Thanks Julian, my best wishes for you!
Thanks for the review. I have had the model UMC202HD for a few years and it has always done a great job, never any issues. I am looking at this unit now for the additional mic inputs.
you do the best reviews, always covering every detail I want to know about. Thank you!
Can't stress enough how useful and enlightening these reviews have been for me, much appreciated Julian!
I really appreciate that you talk about the internal chips used. I haven't found anyone else that does that!
Spectacular review. The best I've seen about audio interfaces. Thank you!
Great review. You always put a lot of work into your reviews. Much appreciated brother.
Thank you for this most useful review, as I have on of these units on the way to me right now!
just subscribed. Love all the real data on these. That's a lot of work to measure this stuff. Thanks.
Excellent review, just what I was looking for.
Thanks for all your videos Julian.
This is the most thorough review for umc404hd. I have no idea of the headache to find all the specs you showed up here because the manufacturer does not supply all of them. Keep it up!
You are the best. No Bias. I have just bought umc202 2 month ago because your review, no regret. Nothing weird. All good. Big Thanks 👍
I appreciate your in-depty review of the UMC404HD. I bought one a couple years ago when they first were introduced. My favorite online store was selling them for $99, which was incredible! Before that, I used the Steinberg UR22, but I was always disappointed in the noise level. The Behringer unit is much quieter, and to me, the other negative items you mentioned are not as important... especially now that I know to not overdrive the inputs! Thank you for an excellent review!
Thank you Julian for making these reviews
Thanks, Julian. More informative than many other channels. I have one of these, based largely on your review. Really only using two of the four inputs at the moment, that will likely change. Re-watching this has cleared up a couple of misunderstandings on my part. Currently running a small Mackie 8 channel mixer into it, with one condenser mic and several line inputs. Audio quality seems very good. Keep up the great work, we need it.
Good review, thanks man. No tedious unboxing, no BS and good tech content. Nice one.
A clear, concise, balanced and well-presented review; thank you!
Absolutely awesome technical review!
Very detailed info! Thanks Julian!
Excellent comprehensive review. Thank you!
Love your channel, super helpful!
Excellent review. Thank you, Julian.
Hey, great review. Keep 'em coming
I've used this for years. Love it, could be better but for the most part it works for me and my podcast.
Such a good video!!! So well explained and reviewed.
Thanks for providing such a relevant unbiased review of affordable audio interfaces, for most of the available devices. Highly appreciated, and I have learned so much from your videos. What is so spectacular is that, for over two decades we have had audio interfaces, and you have from nowhere, popped up to highlight so many issues with these devices that are never covered in the magazines and on forums. Highly valuable youtube channel. I do hope you can evolve a more consistent format , of points to compare, so that, in a similar manner to your headphone comparisons, its also much easier to compare the other audio quality parameters. I acknowledge this is a lot of work, but you are the only one doing this, so just take this as a hint for improvement, not as a criticism.
best most detailed audio interface reviews on youtube! thanks!
I've owned one for 4 years now, still working perfectly
THANK YOU! I've been looking at so many listings and videos trying to find out if the playback outputs are balanced TRS or unbalanced TS. Thanks a ton!
Hi. Thanks for the explanation. I'm new to this subject. Really appreciate
Very thorough! Well done 👍
I love your reviews, thank you so much for your content!
Having done a lot of live multitrack recording, please allow me to clear up how this design makes sense.
Connect the TWO balanced stereo "MAIN" outputs (TRS / XLR) to TWO remote headphone amps.
Connect the "A" balanced stereo output to a remote headphone amp.
All of the above receive the IN/OUT mix.
The "B" balanced output receives no live input mix, only DAW output (send this to the engineer's monitor speakers).
The "MON A/B" switch allows the local headphone amp on the unit to switch between the above two.
This allows the engineer to send a live input / DAW output mix to three remote headphone amps, all stereo and fully balanced, while retaining a stereo balanced line output (B) from the DAW to monitor speakers and the headphone output on the unit, while being able to switch his own headphones to monitor the live mix (A) that is being sent to the remote headphone amps.
It is actually an excellent design, but you have to think about it to know why.
genious!!!!
Is this explained in the manual? Seems like a big oversight if not.
@@nononononegative Not that I know of, I figured it out on my own and decided to share it here to hopefully help others.
@@Richies_Beer_n_Gear and you have helped. Thanks sir
@@Richies_Beer_n_Gear hey Richard, if you were to just need this to connect to a consumer line level device, what would you stick between this device and the device to get the right gain between the two?
Thank you. Great review, and very useful.
Thank you for great content Julian. Very informative and well researched. Helped me to make a decision ;-)
Great review. Lots of good info!
Great information and comparison using your graphs.
Very usefull Professional Review. Thanks julian!
Great video! I have one suggestion tho. At the end of these gear review videos you could provide different alternatives to the products you reviewed and maybe link your reviewes of the alternatives in the description!
That's great review, with clear tips regarding how to get the best out of this gear, based on measurements.
Just sub, I am now a fan. Keep making this content :)
I have this interface, this video was surprisingly helpful
Excellent review! this is the way they should be done, hard data and facts!
Just wow... well done man!
*such* a great technical review
Awesome video. Thanks so much!
Thank you for clear explanation with diagram for output which i can not find on product manual, it really help
Wow, very detailed review!
Excellent video. Thank you.
Excellent review.
Superb review!
Thanks Jules. You answered my question as to whether I should use the pad or not when recording my snare drum. Best just to turn the input to a low level. Cheers.
total support for your kind of review - I get sick of all the fancy-commercial-like talking. keep up the good work
Excellent data thanks so much
Thank you for confirming the distortion I hear on the 204's monitoring.
Another very detailed video. It would be nice if you could add the Allen & Heath Zedi 10 mixer to your list so you could do a review like this of its built-in USB audio interface.
Nice to see Behringer improving their quality substantially. This one would be perfect for beginners and also small studios.
Great reviews man, super detailed!
Got the MOTU M2. Super satisfied thanks for your reviews brother.
Same here. Keep up the great work!
yes
When it gets the single channel option in the drivers it's going to be perfect!
Motu M2 out of stock
Thank you for not acting like an idiot or over over crazy. This was the best review i have ever seen on youtube. Thank you, danke, teşekkürler :)
Another great review, very useful for me, helped me decide to order this model. One thing I notice in reviews of interfaces generally is that no one mentions the quality of the analog to digital conversion. Does that mean the conversion is such high quality in most devices now that there is no need to mention it ?
Love your reviews man! Hands down the best interface reviews on UA-cam. Could it be possible to ever see higher-end interfaces such as the Clarett range or the Babyface Pro?
Absolutely, I currently have the Clarett 2Pre on the test bench. I will make a video about it soon 😉
Your reviews are so comprehensive, I love them. Keep it up.
I would like to hear your thoughts on this interface compared to the presonus 24c.
I don't think you need to worry about that much, Yui. Just get the Behringer.
I Love your reviews....
I picked up one of these on sale a while back for only $100 but I recently replaced it with the Motu M4.
Thanks for the detailed reviews!
How much better was the M4? I expect that it blew you away?
@@aperson4051 I wouldn't say I was blown away. If you use the 404 making sure to stay in the low distortion sweet spots, it's pretty solid. In everyday use, I couldn't tell much difference between the two. But it's nice to not have to worry about finding the sweet spot for low distortion with something like the M4. Also the headphone amp on the 404 is garbage, but I used line out 3/4 to a headphone amp.
What about a review of the tascam 102i/208i series? :) Great work as usual Julian!:)
No one has ever made such a great review! Well done!
P.S. It's true that the playback outputs lack direct monitoring, but I've found a way to direct monitor all 4 channels separately - using the inserts as line out (cables with special wiring required). Now I can record 4 tracks and route them separately to the mixer and adjust some balance, EQ and effects there while recording the dry signal.
Can you make a video of this? More thanks! ❤️
@@xXseyer hey, sorry for the loooong delay :) All you need is a TRS to TS cable (4 of them, actually) wired as follows - S to S, T to T and also T bypassed to R on the TRS. This way, the input of the insert is bypassed to output, but also part of the signal goes to the mixer, right after the preamp. This interface is amazingly good for its price. Only the mix output is a bit quiet.
@@VladimirDonkov soundz interesting this! but could you explain a little more about its usage and + other possible applications? from what i understand your using the playback outs and want to be able to hear + record whats going through the inputs simultaneously? when you say your sending them to a mixer, are you referring to another analog mixer for monitoring/recording? thanx
Thank you very much Julian. Your videos always are top notch with excellent production quality.
I do have a few questions if you have the time!
1. Do you know what the sidetone/headphone monitoring latency is for this interface? it sports a “zero latency” monitoring but ive heard there is no such thing as true 0 ms latency.
2. Will you ever review/tear down the GOXLR? I am looking to get one of these and am a little concerned with the 4.5ms of monitoring latency. Not sure if 4.5ms is good, would love to hear your thoughts on this! Thank you.
I hope all is well, take care!
Spot on. Excellent review. Any chance to run a review of the umc-204hd? Wondering whether its performance would lean towards the 202 or the 404. Thanks!
I bought the UMC 1820 a few weeks back. Works great. Has 48v on the front in two groups of four.
I bought a UMC 1820 almost 2 years ago. I love it. I haven't had any issues with it. I use it almost every day. I have a Behringer Ultragain Pro 8 A/D hooked up to add another 8 inputs. I only use 44.1 since I don't think it makes a difference to what I do. My main DAW is Studio One, but I use it for everything.
@@aretoocrazy I'll probably get the Ultragain too, it would be stupid not to at that price.
excellent review, no bs and full of data to consider. @Julian Krause any chance you do a review on the Tascam 208i?
Sehr sachlich un kompetent, ohne Hokuspokus, das liebe ich. In der Audiobranche grassiert ja sonst eher Emotion und Aberglaube, besonders bei Mikrofonen 😉 Daher ist es sehr erholsam soetwas wie Deinen Kanal zu sehen.
Awesome review Julian.. Is this a good candidate for recording with an external preamp (like a Great River) via the inserts ?
You make the best reviews without no doubt! Better than "sos" and all the others! Wow, keep up this shannel and you will be contacted by all the big names to make reviews! 5 points
Awesome Review! One thing though: I have this audio interface and I drive it without the power supply. Only with the USB cable. One time I even managed to record 3 different microphones with only the USB power.
Cheers!
Same here. I just measured the current my UMC404HD draws from the USB bus and got the following values:
When using external power supply: 0.00 A
No external power supply, phantom power off: 0.37 A
No ext ps, phantom power on: 0.37 A
No ext ps, phantom power on, one condenser mic connected: 0.42 A
However, when phantom power is switched on (or the interface is connected with phantom power enabled), there seems to be a current spike, that goes slightly above 0.5 A. This might trigger the over-current protection in some computers or USB hubs.
I also run it USB-only, actually lost the psu, lol
Glad I watched this, was considering many options and the low price of the Behringer makes it tempting however I assumed you would be able to switch between A and B monitors so glad I didn’t pull the trigger. Gonna go with Motu instead. Thanks 👍
Jules your German efficiency and dead pan delivery are on the money!
cringe
@@peterchoe What do you mean Pete?
I've had one for years, and it has given me zero issues.
I think it's an amazing "bang for your buck" interface.
Wow full on in depth, really good straight to the point no BS. thanks. So in your opinion what is the best bang for buck performance sweetspot USB AI if you don't need 4 mic inputs? any recommendations?
As always this was a great presentation of the UMC 404hd. I am aware that you have limited time to put this presentation together but I have a general thought for all content creators; How come the discussion of the midi ports are left out? I have purchase audio interfaces where the midi ports just didn't work. Also, you didn't discuss DAW application. With the behringer does it come with a driver? I check Ableton and found that it is not listed in the preferences. So along with the variables you have discuss it would have been great to know what the setup will be like. With all that I have written, whenever I want an honest, and detailed analysis of a product I check with you first. Please keep up the great work.
Hi, you are a good professional and I can rely on what you say, thank you!
Great work Julian, thank you so much for all this info. What about Roland Rubix44, is it a similar device? can't find much info/reviews, there must be something about it not being that popular. for €219 it could be discussed widely when looking into the 4 input area. Planning on getting one to test anytime soon? :)
Good review. I bought this unit and it's been 2 months now and I'm quite satisfice with the performance. There are a couple things I would like to share about this interface, if you connect it to the outlet and USB at the same time when the PC sleeps and wakes up, most of the time in my case, Windows 10 doesn't recognize it so I decided not to use the power supply anymore; this unit has the same issue of the sleep and wake up when it is connected through a passive USB hub not like my old UR12 which had no problem at least in my last two PCs. I use this interface with OBS and ASIO plugin to have access to all inputs and control each independently, that's the beauty for that price ;)
Here is my question, which microphone you used to record yourself in this episode? I saw 48V activated and I'm quite sure you are using a shotgun mic, Sennheiser?
I was expecting this review for a long time in order to decide if I should buy it or not, but according to the specs and test you made I am quite sure I made a good investment. Keep working Julian Krause, one of the best channels about audio gear in UA-cam!!! (￣ー￣)ｂ
Probably the most useful audio interface review i've seen. Excellent job! Is the UMC1820 likely to be the same all around? What would you recommend to step up to if you want a significantly better interface? Personally I'm debating whether to go for something like the Behringer, an RME digiface with ADA8200 / Audient Pres / Ferrofish expansion options, or whether to go big and buy a high priced interface like the RME UFXII which I'm sure will serve me well for 10-15 years. MOTU do a lot of options like the 16A that have lots of inputs or the 24AI and there's the Presonus 2626 which should give very low latency like RME although the longevity of support might be lacking. There's also the studiolive III 24R. I'm mainly looking for reliable rock solid performance over many years and as low latency as possible with lots of line inputs (At least expandable to 16 if not 24). Audient Evo 8 is another option that ticks the box. The just released Arturia Audiofuse 16 rig seems very useful but I don't know about their support / drivers or audio quality. I'm on Mac OSX by the way.
Just great rev
Thank you Julian! Can you test current UAD Apollo (twin and X series) vs RME Fireface UFX II?
AND I WAS JUST THINKING OF GETTING THIS. Very timely
Finally my mind reading lessons pay off :)
for me it was a toss up between the motu m2 and the ssl2+ but I went with the motu m2 after seeing Julian's shootout video. I'd imagine the motu m4 is also just as good if you want more inputs.
I have the 202 and I was thinking of upgrading to a 4 input unit :)
@@JulianKrause I actually thought of you reviewing this unit the day before you released it, so my mind control techniques are working well! :)
Great review. As an engineer, I want to see the real specs, and that's what you provide.
PS The MIDI lights do not indicate audio, Julian. The "D" is for...
PPS I enjoyed the 'gain' joke.
Great videos comparing different lower priced interfaces! Are you planing to try more high end end interfaces such as Apogee, Universal audio? Would be really interesting to see the numbers compared to these lower priced.
Where did this unboxing fetish come from? LOL
Thinking of getting one, just for the insert chanels, have an RME interface, but this seems as a good addition.
Such a awesome review! Is it worth swapping this particular interface for a focusrite one (4i4 for example)?
No