Could it be because the law doesn't allow anyone to disclose any medical information about anyone, no matter who they are? Could it be that the King has demanded Hazbeen to come out and tell the story of his kids' births and he would not do it, because his wife wouldn't allow him to? Could it be because, if the King or the Firm discloses the details, he/they would immediately be accused of invasion of privacy by the Montecito duo? Anyway... Didn't we heard rumours that Hazbeen, after discussions with his father, was ready to talk about the issue at some point, but, in the end, he decided not to do it... or something happened and he then refused to do it? I kind of remember hearing this, some time ago.... To conclude, at this point, as the kids ARE in the LoS, some action MUST BE TAKEN, the duo should be asked to provide the relevant legal documents that prove the "born from the body", the presence of a doctor and his/her assistants, the exact date of the birth, etc. THIS the King CAN and SHOULD DO, in my humble opinion. And the longer he hesitates to ask for these documents, the worst his position will be... could it be that he doesn't care enough about the future of the Monarchy, I don't know, BUT he will be accused of that if he does nothing. Just sharing my subjective thoughts, feelings and opinion on the matter here...
The RF are not helpless against MM, they just choose to ignore her and to ignore the puff pieces and the sugars. There is power in ignoring a non-entity. The RF knows that in Hollywood, celebrities come and celebrities go. And that the novelty of Harry and Meghan's 'our truth' story is really wearing thin and their limelight is fading. If you only make one movie or tell the same story over and over, you are done. The RF have moved on...
I have never thought MM gave birth to those children. She is always eager to pontificate that if she had been pregnant, we would have been inundated with articles about diet tips for morning sickness, yoga for the pregnant mom. Etc. Instead, all we got was the claw cradling the (moon)bump. In my opinion
It is ironic how #5 had the gall to publicly criticize his father's parenting skills and even the parenting skills of his grandmother the late Queen. Archie is coming into an age where he will start asking questions. We have an adopted child and it was around the age of 5 that he started asking questions. We have always been open with him about his adoption, answering any question he has. Children have a right to know where they came from.
I used to think Archie existed but I am doubting that now. I have heard a couple of comments just in the past few days that KC has not even seen Archie. I don't believe there has ever been a girl.
Me neither. I also don't believe Archie lives with them. Bookworm is so arrogant and trying so hard to make out as if she has real sources. She knows nothing, just like every other UA-camr. Unless there are pictures of this so called Zoom call with Archie in it, I do not believe it. Anybody can contact any UA-camr and say they are someone "close" to Catherine, William or even MeGain and be talking absolute shite. Who is to say this is not a SS member saying they saw Archie?
I totally agree, Harry and Meghan can NOT have it both ways, especially as they reside in the USA, where there is NO royalty and royal titles have NO legal status. Either their (and their 'children's') British Royal titles are removed or voided or renounced and they live as private citizens, therefore, they can hide their children all they want from the public, or this family moves to the UK. Or resides in Nigeria, or another Commonwealth nation.
Both are. I think Harry was on medications for his mental illness and well monitored for decades. He's also a drug addict. No sane doctor would recommend a person with heavy mental and addictions problems to become a parent. Sadly it happens often. This children are mostly sick since birth. I don't believe they have any children till they provide proof.
It will never happen. She was sterilised years ago. There was a brief announcement from KP and quickly withdrawn of congratulations to H and M including surrogacy. I’m sure someone has screenshots of this.
DNA from Charles for definite, and I think maybe her fourth husband (as seen online a photograph with a young lad, her mother and a very rounded tummy).
@@IreneArcher-yt1kryou are perfectly entitled to your view. However, gaslighting on a global scale is extremely dangerous and it needs to be called out, more now than ever, whoever the perpetrator. It is irresponsible to allow corrosive dishonest behaviour to continue to undermine societal values.
My question. Did MM tell H she was pregnant when she crashed Inskip's 2017 Jamaica wedding? Read that H broke up with her Dec. 2016. That she was originally a plus 1. He went solo. She stalked him there. After arguing (there are photos), she seduced him. After returning to London, she wouldn't let him go. Bore down until he proposed. She had a supposed "miscarriage" before the wedding. This conflicts with yesterday's narrative that they were both "in love" and wanted to start a family asap.
I agree that things rolled out as you’ve described. But I believe that after the wedding she may have played the victim to Harry, saying that because of the miscarriage she had found out that she couldn’t conceive again, so recruited him into her plan so that they could still have their beautiful family, just like W and C. I think he fell for it hook, line and sinker. I also believe that she understood the ‘of the body’ rule of LOS eligibility and that was the reason for her subterfuge but was unaware of the adoption requirement of surrogacy in the UK. That is what threw a wrench in her plan.
If these children exist they being kept under bizarre conditions which should be a serious cause for concern. They are shrouded in secrecy, hidden away and isolated from all contact with any family members bar one. No grandparents, no aunts, uncles or cousins….NONE, from either side of the family. Now, by anybody’s standard that is beyond weird and, I believe, the well-being of these children should be thoroughly investigated.
Remember the photos of meg and small baby archie turning up to the polo match every photo was of her on her own could see Catherine and a few others in background but noticed nobody come over to have a look at the new royal baby even Catherine just ignored her
If these children were ever taken out in public, come random citizen would by now have seen them. Even from a distance, in the back of a vehicle. I don’t read every celebrity rag, or every social media site, so perhaps I’ve missed something. I definitely do not believe the grifter gave birth to two children that are Henry’s.
Agree. There is nothing parental about the couple. If Harry had a child, we would see it. Playing footsie ball with a baby boy that didn't want to cuddle with him was definitely shows there is no son. I think if H had a son, he would be affectionate and would take the child out. Legless Betty doesn't exist either.
Archie doesn't live in California. He lives in England with two women. He is finally happy and out of the dark. Harry sees him. She does not. Charles pays for his care. Something happened and Archie is in England. I've seen it. Believe or not. It will come out.
A constitutional Monarchy requires transparency regarding births. The UK public have the right to know and if said parents want privacy and to swerve protocol then the titles must go. Why everything is so complicated and murky with that woman is reason enough to demand THE truth.
I wonder what their plan was for the long term with those kids. With no proof, and an education for them, what is going to take place. Well done on all research Bookie
I think Archie does exist, but dont think of MM body. I totally agree that she alters, photo-shops, and tinkers with images of the child, to deliberately confuse, and keep in the news. . She love, love loves the attention, and its her way of sticking a finger up to the world. . Archie is her reserve pay check to be cashed in, when needed imo.
I think most people on zoom calls probably try to sit somewhere where their kids aren't running around in the background being a distraction. Especially someone who doesn't seem to want her kids to be seen. Unless she wants the person on the zoom call to tell everyone: "I saw the kids in the background on a zoom call with Megan - they do exist!"
Frankly, it could be anyone's child running around in the background, couldn't it. Like, one of the staff's kids, or a visitor's kid. Or, as you hint, a hired extra, for evidence. Wonder how many zoom calls M made that day?!
I don't buy that story at all! I don't even believe the source is really connected to William or Catherine, sorry I just don't! And unless there are photographs to back up the so called child on the Zoom call, I believe it is a lie. And I don't believe that it is a legitimate source either. Why would this so-called "source" not tell other UA-camrs the same story? There are others with far more reach and subscribers than someone who lives in the arse end of Africa.
I really think that she puts out edited photos of children without specifically stating that they are Merchie and Lillibucks to deliberately cause speculation.
Yes, they buggered around so much we don’t know up from down. You sounded so much like my mother she always got annoyed with people and told them to stop buggering around. 😂
There are other points which have never been addressed. I’m sure you can find some answers. 1. It’s believed m’s father/sister?stated that m had all her eggs frozen at age 28. 2. What do some Royal experts know when they always refer to the kids as Harry’s children? 3. Is it probable that m’s frozen eggs ‘failed’ and other women’s eggs were used so they truly are just Harry’s children? 4. Much is made of the children’s blue eyes and red/auburn hair. I understood genetically brown eyes and dark/black hair are dominant genetically. Were these designer kids?
My Dad had blue eyes white blonde hair as did my sister and brother. My mom had brown eyes chestnut hair. I have almost black eyes and med holden blonde hair. So I dont buy that one.
If megnuts is hybrid brown blue eye colour alleles, and handbag is blue blue eye colour alleles, then there is a chance the kid might get a blue blue eye colour combo and be blue eyed. Is meegain's father blue eyed?
To address your #3 , IVF of M frozen egg and H sperm and implant to a surrogate uterus is not as easy as it sound, success rate is low. May need to be repeated many times and also expensive and mentally exhausting. If M has a uterus ,why not simply implant back to her own body , no need for surrogate. No need to fake pregnancy. Safe to say M own egg never used.
Well done for taking it easy................ With regard to these children, the markles can't photoshop - well done to the Wales family for making it impossible (by causing so much issue over a little photoshopping on the Mothers Day photograph) 😉😉😉
And misan got busted by the Sidley twins....how ironic that Jack Royston just stated that we might never see the kids again....because of all the speculation....wouldnt that just fit their purpose....they witch hunted Catherine ....forced her to make a statement....so how about they show one family photo....to shut the speculaters down...they wont because they cant.....painted themselves into a corner....
So you don’t think it’s possible that Meghan is keeping those kids from King Charles until he meets her demands? I do. She might want money, status, housing, or a public apology.
I do beleive there us a an " Archy". He was not born of her body. However, she had to have an ancor baby to get THAT WOMAN IN THE MONEY. SO BETTY WAS PURCHASED TO GIVE HER LEVERAGE !!😊
Hi Bookie,,,i totally agree with you over the photos🙏 could it be the alleged surrogate doesnt want such photos published in the public domain🤔 thankyou for the video🌺👋🏴
I think both exist but not living with them, Archie was born before they got married none of us has seen him he is with the birth mother in the UK, MM probably adopted him. As for lily it's adoption went wrong she lives with her birth mother so they have no custody of any kids. Arch is Harry's son but Lily has no blood relations with them and they hv lost her... sad but why are they doing all these magic show
Hi Bookie! My question is simple, if Charles wants to clear all this mess up, or not, there's nothing anyone could do about it. I keep thinking the Archie mess should have been handled by the Queen, he was born during her reign. She did nothing. UK people keep stating, Charles was taught by the best! So, how can they believe it and then complaint exactly of what they do believe? These "kids" are in the LoS, nobody will take them from it!
Well apparently there are quite of few people who allowed themselves to participate in this fraud, and should be prosecuted WHEN the truth is disclosed to the public. Yes, the truth will come out.
I don't know why you keep saying that their are archie and lillibet, its obvious that woman doesn't have any children. This is one reason i don't watch you very often.
Thank you! This, for me, is the *most important* question. We need to know how they got here. Answer that question, and you'll have answers to any questions that may be floating around about the children. Now, if they nix the titles and step out of the LoS, then we wouldn't be questioning nor would we care. And perhaps that's the point. They (or M at least) need them to stay "salable". I believe they exist because M needs the anchor to the RF, to keep H on side, to have something to keep H attached to her, and, if needs be, as a meal ticket. I'm willing to be wrong, but at this point this is what I believe.
I feel sorry for this poor child. Can you imagine growing up with those three people? They travel all over the place and maybe spend 3 weeks in the year with those people.
It is his integrity The Kings integrity that is a steak. That's his son in the line of secession along with the children . It's gone on too long Time for the King to step up
For sure The Queen should have said and done something . She's gone and he's The Kings SON. Why let those two destroy THE MONARCHY? Cause it's going to , it has tarnished allll their reputations .
Yes I think she used a surrogate & personally I do believe there are children with them. But in my opinion that makes things even more sad. I cannot even imagine what sort of existence those poor children have. Never seen, parents always gone & both with various mental health issues. Add in TW’s cruelty it’s just sad. 😢
Honestly, who cares about their kids. How do you know for absolute certain those kids exist? Seriously, how? I use to think they were real but as time goes on…🤷🏻♀
It's Ashli / Danja Zone ❤had a good source named Jay who confirmed the presence of a child living with Hazbeen and wife in CA. When it was supposed to be Arche.
Don't be so rude,,, Sueforte,,,how old is alleged Archie? Lovely Ashlie was around from the very beginning,, R.I.P Ashlie?🙏😥 I remember her saying she had a good source named Jay too Kathy🤔
@sueforte4947 No, she did not. Ashley Sloane passed away in August of 2022. Her channel, first known as "Danja Zone" and later as "It's Ashli" is still on UA-cam.
Lady C did say the RF can’t discuss MM private medical information even the RF w all their power and influence by law can’t disclose any of MM medical information……
She did say that but it rings hollow. It seemed to me the Queen did as she pleased bc, well,she was Queen. She didn’t abuse her power but she used it when necessary. Charles has shown himself to be weak thus far.
IF there is an " archie" - WHO BIRTHED him? WHOSE DNA does he carry? THIS DETERMINES HIS ELIGIBILITY TO THE LOS. I Agree with T&T 's theory- IF he is real - he may be harry's- through an illicit affair. There may be MANY archie bunkers, IMO 😅
Bookie I feel that you must realise the rf don’t want you nor anyone to know the facts 🤔 Not even those who know don’t want to say , even you 🤷♀️ I think it’s all such a drama ! I feel that mm is not the only one that lies & not just about this ?! 🤔 Jmo 🤗
@evapavlou5296: some people do know some facts (with proof/receipts) but not necessarily the truth of how everything fits together. My suggestion is to write to KP, not BP, asking for an official answer how to deal with their knowledge. Publicise or what? The reply would be most interesting. But it could expose the informer in an unwanted way. BTW, I am sure the Press is in this position, their research and archives are awesome.
This is my opinion you know something let it out, i hate the dripping of the tap, it's time the world know that we were fooled. The are way passed their expiration date lets go already tell the truth and be done with it just saying.
I thought the person who saw archie in the background on a zoom call that contacted you was a maid or nanny. Or maybe it was another channel? Im not sure but i do remember hearing about that story, but instead of it being a distant relative, it was a maid/nanny.
Booky my darling, Meghan going to a market with a child isn't informative or unusual. You must be more specific. Was she seen with a child under the age of ten or was she seen with a child under the age of 45?😁 Love the videos, keep them coming.
@@DanaDakota i subsribe to prime royal monarchy and its on there piers morgan is talking with Rosanne and she reckons shes seen the evidence. Who knows maybe its true or maybe not
Hi,,,I,LL look that up...check out a post by O.M.G!916. Community posts,,,,she puts up good info, she does meditation. And has appeared on a Tarot readers channel,,,a long while back,,,what she has to say is totally believable🤔
I think it is ridiculous to say because he is not born of the body Archie can not be in the line of succession. Born of the body WILL be updated to modern day age. As Long As the Child as both Parents DNA 100 percent is all that matters.
Well, that's the question, isn't it. If he does have both H and M's DNA that's one good thing, at least, but it's not enough. As British law currently stands, an adopted child, even if it is your own biological product, cannot inherit your titles, and when the Marquess and Marchioness very recently tested this in court for their own second son, born in 2016 via IVF/surrogate but biologically their own, they failed to carry the day. Even when it's wrong, it's the law, and H&M have broken it if Archie is theirs but born clandestinely via a surrogate. As the previous video on this subject explained, they could have been open about the surrogacy and sought to get the law changed, but that would have been a very long process taking several years, with an uncertain outcome, and they didn't want to take the risk of being unsuccessful. They wanted to have a fully 'royal' child, so they cheated - allegedly. If so, that is a legal problem.
As bizarre as it seems, I often suspect that haznone and the soho mattress ho are not married. Remember, they did not use their full names during the wedding service. Also, Archie's birth certificate was altered - the name of the mother was initially entered as that of the soho mattress ho BUT was changed to Duchess of Sussex. So, who is the legitimate Duchess of Sussex?
Anything is possible with those two,,I know they did,nt say the correct names when they got married,,however I think it only matters what names they sign in the marriage certificate,,,although I think they could have already been married previously,,and that she actually been telling the truth for once,,when she said so in DOPRAH interview,,, and that is why she was allowed to go to Sandringham with R,F,,at Christmas time,,,when no other girlfriend had been🤔 in my opinion,,,
that would actually make sense. harry is legally married to the birth mother, the legitimate duchess of sussex, so the kids are in Los as they are of the body. that is why hm 'married' so quickly. hm had to cover for the baby harry already had. and that is what m has over H and the rf. 😮 far fetched and crazy but could it be true?
Some of us felt when she was in the service of her latest marriage with the idiot that this would not end well. Her demeanour, her families behavior and her guest list said way more than most believed.
If it’s all legitimate and above board there would be no need to hide things, seal records etc. Let’s have the truth.
🎯
Bingo! Easy
Have you met Harry? He’s a paranoid idiot! 😂
Yep!!
Didn’t the queen lock up the documents in her safe ? 🤔
Meaning I think that the rf know everything ?! 🤷♀️
🤗
I can't understand why an institution such as RF, are so helpless against a non-entity such as Meghan Markle!!
Megan is backed by powerful people who wants the Monarchy to fall. So their battle is not just Megan
They greatly underestimated her.
I thought the Data Protection Laws prevent a lot of disclosures
Could it be because the law doesn't allow anyone to disclose any medical information about anyone, no matter who they are? Could it be that the King has demanded Hazbeen to come out and tell the story of his kids' births and he would not do it, because his wife wouldn't allow him to?
Could it be because, if the King or the Firm discloses the details, he/they would immediately be accused of invasion of privacy by the Montecito duo?
Anyway... Didn't we heard rumours that Hazbeen, after discussions with his father, was ready to talk about the issue at some point, but, in the end, he decided not to do it... or something happened and he then refused to do it? I kind of remember hearing this, some time ago....
To conclude, at this point, as the kids ARE in the LoS, some action MUST BE TAKEN, the duo should be asked to provide the relevant legal documents that prove the "born from the body", the presence of a doctor and his/her assistants, the exact date of the birth, etc. THIS the King CAN and SHOULD DO, in my humble opinion. And the longer he hesitates to ask for these documents, the worst his position will be... could it be that he doesn't care enough about the future of the Monarchy, I don't know, BUT he will be accused of that if he does nothing.
Just sharing my subjective thoughts, feelings and opinion on the matter here...
The RF are not helpless against MM, they just choose to ignore her and to ignore the puff pieces and the sugars. There is power in ignoring a non-entity. The RF knows that in Hollywood, celebrities come and celebrities go. And that the novelty of Harry and Meghan's 'our truth' story is really wearing thin and their limelight is fading. If you only make one movie or tell the same story over and over, you are done. The RF have moved on...
I have never thought MM gave birth to those children. She is always eager to pontificate that if she had been pregnant, we would have been inundated with articles about diet tips for morning sickness, yoga for the pregnant mom. Etc. Instead, all we got was the claw cradling the (moon)bump. In my opinion
100%agree
.she would have been done baby books, pregnancy books inc diet, fashion and much more..cos she is the expert on everything afterall
@@asmith8603 ?????
Meghan would have copied Demi Moore’s pregnancy pictures in the nude, had Meghan been pregnant. You can’t get good Demi photos wearing a moonbump!
Harry holds grudges against his family.
These will fade into insignificance compared to the grudges Archie will hold against his "parents."
A very bitter, and nasty man. Thankfully, we have seen the real Harry markle
Yep
Will be a monster compared to the father... best they hide him forever.
'bellend' is an understatement where Harry is concerned.
It is ironic how #5 had the gall to publicly criticize his father's parenting skills and even the parenting skills of his grandmother the late Queen. Archie is coming into an age where he will start asking questions. We have an adopted child and it was around the age of 5 that he started asking questions. We have always been open with him about his adoption, answering any question he has. Children have a right to know where they came from.
I don’t believe the girl exists.
I don’t think she exists either.
I used to think Archie existed but I am doubting that now. I have heard a couple of comments just in the past few days that KC has not even seen Archie. I don't believe there has ever been a girl.
I think she exits but something went wrong with adoption and she’s living life with her mom and not under Lily.
Me neither. I also don't believe Archie lives with them. Bookworm is so arrogant and trying so hard to make out as if she has real sources. She knows nothing, just like every other UA-camr. Unless there are pictures of this so called Zoom call with Archie in it, I do not believe it. Anybody can contact any UA-camr and say they are someone "close" to Catherine, William or even MeGain and be talking absolute shite. Who is to say this is not a SS member saying they saw Archie?
@@phoenixrises5169 Agree 100%.
Meghan the queen of misinformation that’s her.
I totally agree, Harry and Meghan can NOT have it both ways, especially as they reside in the USA, where there is NO royalty and royal titles have NO legal status. Either their (and their 'children's') British Royal titles are removed or voided or renounced and they live as private citizens, therefore, they can hide their children all they want from the public, or this family moves to the UK. Or resides in Nigeria, or another Commonwealth nation.
Markle is a very sick person
She is beyond help.
So is Harry!
Both are. I think Harry was on medications for his mental illness and well monitored for decades. He's also a drug addict.
No sane doctor would recommend a person with heavy mental and addictions problems to become a parent. Sadly it happens often. This children are mostly sick since birth.
I don't believe they have any children till they provide proof.
She's a psycho!!
IMO we need to see official independent proof that TOW birthed two children fathered by her third husband.
It will never happen. She was sterilised years ago. There was a brief announcement from KP and quickly withdrawn of congratulations to H and M including surrogacy. I’m sure someone has screenshots of this.
She never birthed them either of them.
DNA from Charles for definite, and I think maybe her fourth husband (as seen online a photograph with a young lad, her mother and a very rounded tummy).
We need to focus on something Worthwhile in the world not this.
Did they Did He Did M. All so irrelevant.
@@IreneArcher-yt1kryou are perfectly entitled to your view. However, gaslighting on a global scale is extremely dangerous and it needs to be called out, more now than ever, whoever the perpetrator. It is irresponsible to allow corrosive dishonest behaviour to continue to undermine societal values.
My question. Did MM tell H she was pregnant when she crashed Inskip's 2017 Jamaica wedding? Read that H broke up with her Dec. 2016. That she was originally a plus 1. He went solo. She stalked him there. After arguing (there are photos), she seduced him. After returning to London, she wouldn't let him go. Bore down until he proposed. She had a supposed "miscarriage" before the wedding. This conflicts with yesterday's narrative that they were both "in love" and wanted to start a family asap.
I agree that things rolled out as you’ve described. But I believe that after the wedding she may have played the victim to Harry, saying that because of the miscarriage she had found out that she couldn’t conceive again, so recruited him into her plan so that they could still have their beautiful family, just like W and C. I think he fell for it hook, line and sinker. I also believe that she understood the ‘of the body’ rule of LOS eligibility and that was the reason for her subterfuge but was unaware of the adoption requirement of surrogacy in the UK. That is what threw a wrench in her plan.
@@wendyhendersong That makes sense. It also means that H went along with her moon bump scam. In the end, it will all backfire on them big time!
Imho you are 100% correct in everything your wrote imo
If these children exist they being kept under bizarre conditions which should be a serious cause for concern. They are shrouded in secrecy, hidden away and isolated from all contact with any family members bar one. No grandparents, no aunts, uncles or cousins….NONE, from either side of the family. Now, by anybody’s standard that is beyond weird and, I believe, the well-being of these children should be thoroughly investigated.
Remember the photos of meg and small baby archie turning up to the polo match every photo was of her on her own could see Catherine and a few others in background but noticed nobody come over to have a look at the new royal baby even Catherine just ignored her
Hopefully the truth comes out
I can’t believe that these children are never seen anywhere or by anyone ever.
If these children were ever taken out in public, come random citizen would by now have seen them. Even from a distance, in the back of a vehicle. I don’t read every celebrity rag, or every social media site, so perhaps I’ve missed something. I definitely do not believe the grifter gave birth to two children that are Henry’s.
I’m 100% positive there are no children. The truth has to come out.
Agree. There is nothing parental about the couple. If Harry had a child, we would see it. Playing footsie ball with a baby boy that didn't want to cuddle with him was definitely shows there is no son. I think if H had a son, he would be affectionate and would take the child out. Legless Betty doesn't exist either.
Love your idea about the channel creators getting together and exchanging the tid bits to finally expose the scam relationship!
The jigsaw would be ginormous
Archie doesn't live in California. He lives in England with two women. He is finally happy and out of the dark. Harry sees him. She does not. Charles pays for his care. Something happened and Archie is in England.
I've seen it. Believe or not. It will come out.
A constitutional Monarchy requires transparency regarding births. The UK public have the right to know and if said parents want privacy and to swerve protocol then the titles must go. Why everything is so complicated and murky with that woman is reason enough to demand THE truth.
Her toes will not curl when Archie is removed from the line of succession!!
I wonder what their plan was for the long term with those kids. With no proof, and an education for them, what is going to take place. Well done on all research Bookie
They are mentally too immature to plan the future or to even work with a young healthy surrogate for 9 months.
I think Archie does exist, but dont think of MM body.
I totally agree that she alters, photo-shops, and tinkers with images of the child, to deliberately confuse, and keep in the news.
.
She love, love loves the attention, and its her way of sticking a finger up to the world.
.
Archie is her reserve pay check to be cashed in, when needed imo.
I think most people on zoom calls probably try to sit somewhere where their kids aren't running around in the background being a distraction. Especially someone who doesn't seem to want her kids to be seen. Unless she wants the person on the zoom call to tell everyone: "I saw the kids in the background on a zoom call with Megan - they do exist!"
Frankly, it could be anyone's child running around in the background, couldn't it. Like, one of the staff's kids, or a visitor's kid. Or, as you hint, a hired extra, for evidence. Wonder how many zoom calls M made that day?!
I don't buy that story at all! I don't even believe the source is really connected to William or Catherine, sorry I just don't! And unless there are photographs to back up the so called child on the Zoom call, I believe it is a lie. And I don't believe that it is a legitimate source either. Why would this so-called "source" not tell other UA-camrs the same story? There are others with far more reach and subscribers than someone who lives in the arse end of Africa.
I really think that she puts out edited photos of children without specifically stating that they are Merchie and Lillibucks to deliberately cause speculation.
Yes, they buggered around so much we don’t know up from down. You sounded so much like my mother she always got annoyed with people and told them to stop buggering around. 😂
I am so happy that you spent some well deserved time on self care and relaxation Bookie ❤ Caroline, Milan, Italy
Whatever kids exist, they will need so much therapy. It’s sad.
8:44 I don't believe they exist. You haven't convinced me. 🤔You have changed your tune about the subject.
Loads of the megsi community made a u turn about the kids. Suspicious
There are other points which have never been addressed. I’m sure you can find some answers.
1. It’s believed m’s father/sister?stated that m had all her eggs frozen at age 28.
2. What do some Royal experts know when they always refer to the kids as Harry’s children?
3. Is it probable that m’s frozen eggs ‘failed’ and other women’s eggs were used so they truly are just Harry’s children?
4. Much is made of the children’s blue eyes and red/auburn hair. I understood genetically brown eyes and dark/black hair are dominant genetically. Were these designer kids?
My Dad had blue eyes white blonde hair as did my sister and brother. My mom had brown eyes chestnut hair. I have almost black eyes and med holden blonde hair. So I dont buy that one.
If megnuts is hybrid brown blue eye colour alleles, and handbag is blue blue eye colour alleles, then there is a chance the kid might get a blue blue eye colour combo and be blue eyed. Is meegain's father blue eyed?
To address your #3 , IVF of M frozen egg and H sperm and implant to a surrogate uterus is not as easy as it sound, success rate is low. May need to be repeated many times and also expensive and mentally exhausting. If M has a uterus ,why not simply implant back to her own body , no need for surrogate. No need to fake pregnancy. Safe to say M own egg never used.
@joeyxiaoqio8867 she had a hysterectomy whe she was 27 she stated that herself on her blog
I cant see any connection between the two photographs of those two children.
They are clearly two different children. Different eyes, different nose.
Lady C,and Neil Sean call them Harry's children.They both have inside Royal sources.
Lol, if you believe either of them - I have a bridge to sell you.
Have they really? I doubt it.
They are making $$ just like everyone who jumped on the Markles handwagon
What a lovely morning you had. ❤
I do feel sorry for the children.
Agree the so called children should not have Titles or be in line of succession harkles are makeing a complete mockery
Good Morning BookWorms
From NewJersey U. S.
Jersey girl here too!
Well done for taking it easy................
With regard to these children, the markles can't photoshop - well done to the Wales family for making it impossible (by causing so much issue over a little photoshopping on the Mothers Day photograph)
😉😉😉
And misan got busted by the Sidley twins....how ironic that Jack Royston just stated that we might never see the kids again....because of all the speculation....wouldnt that just fit their purpose....they witch hunted Catherine ....forced her to make a statement....so how about they show one family photo....to shut the speculaters down...they wont because they cant.....painted themselves into a corner....
So you don’t think it’s possible that Meghan is keeping those kids from King Charles until he meets her demands?
I do. She might want money, status, housing, or a public apology.
That photo is a lovely picture of August Brooksbank
Sorry. Do not agree. There are no children with them
I agree, I'm not convinced there are children. I still think it's a all a big con. Taking everyone for fools.
I do beleive there us a an " Archy".
He was not born of her body.
However, she had to have an ancor baby to get THAT WOMAN IN THE MONEY.
SO BETTY WAS PURCHASED TO GIVE HER LEVERAGE !!😊
I've thought A looks a little older than 4 months on South African trip and a little older than 12 months in the 1st Birthday reading video.
Hi Bookie,,,i totally agree with you over the photos🙏 could it be the alleged surrogate doesnt want such photos published in the public domain🤔 thankyou for the video🌺👋🏴
I don't believe either child exists, sorry
same.
Agree
I think he exists but does not live with them.
I think both exist but not living with them, Archie was born before they got married none of us has seen him he is with the birth mother in the UK, MM probably adopted him. As for lily it's adoption went wrong she lives with her birth mother so they have no custody of any kids. Arch is Harry's son but Lily has no blood relations with them and they hv lost her... sad but why are they doing all these magic show
Hi Bookie!
My question is simple, if Charles wants to clear all this mess up, or not, there's nothing anyone could do about it.
I keep thinking the Archie mess should have been handled by the Queen, he was born during her reign. She did nothing. UK people keep stating, Charles was taught by the best! So, how can they believe it and then complaint exactly of what they do believe?
These "kids" are in the LoS, nobody will take them from it!
That picture of Archie has the same turned in eye as Nag-han has.. Whatever. Thank you Bookie ❤🌹
I’m sorry. I think your source is only one source. There is no biological Archie or furthermore Lily. There is far too many discrepancies!
Apparently, they never considered that kids eventually grow up.
Those "children" are real ..surely we will see them as years go by 🤔🥴
That little boy looks so sad.
Well apparently there are quite of few people who allowed themselves to participate in this fraud, and should be prosecuted WHEN the truth is disclosed to the public. Yes, the truth will come out.
Eugenie for one.....
I don't know why you keep saying that their are archie and lillibet, its obvious that woman doesn't have any children. This is one reason i don't watch you very often.
Rude!
Thank you! This, for me, is the *most important* question. We need to know how they got here. Answer that question, and you'll have answers to any questions that may be floating around about the children. Now, if they nix the titles and step out of the LoS, then we wouldn't be questioning nor would we care. And perhaps that's the point. They (or M at least) need them to stay "salable". I believe they exist because M needs the anchor to the RF, to keep H on side, to have something to keep H attached to her, and, if needs be, as a meal ticket. I'm willing to be wrong, but at this point this is what I believe.
I feel sorry for this poor child. Can you imagine growing up with those three people? They travel all over the place and maybe spend 3 weeks in the year with those people.
No the main question is WHY KING CHARLES DOESN'T TELL THE TRUTH ??.??????
It’s not his truth to tell. However it is his duty to ensure the line of succession stays royal
It is his integrity The Kings integrity that is a steak. That's his son in the line of secession along with the children . It's gone on too long Time for the King to step up
Why didn't Queen Elizabeth? Stop blaming the King all the time.
For sure The Queen should have said and done something . She's gone and he's The Kings SON. Why let those two destroy THE MONARCHY? Cause it's going to , it has tarnished allll their reputations .
If he exists who's is he and WHERE is he?
No way did Megzila give birth to any child since she had a hysterectomy at 29 years old
Even Lady C says that there is children. She never says anything else
Yes I think she used a surrogate & personally I do believe there are children with them. But in my opinion that makes things even more sad. I cannot even imagine what sort of existence those poor children have. Never seen, parents always gone & both with various mental health issues. Add in TW’s cruelty it’s just sad. 😢
I don’t know where the hysterectomy story came from and if it’s really true. 🦋🏴🦋
I would also like to know
I wonder the same thing. I keep hearing her father said that, but nobody ever provides proof.
Her father told us
SHE NEVER HAD A WOMB
@@breezey8932 I have also heard this but I don't know where it started and who told it.
Archie looks like he might have a similar eye problem to that of Lady Louise. IMO
Lady Louise was a premature birth if anything methane looks as if she has a problem in certain photos
MeGain has a squint
Honestly, who cares about their kids. How do you know for absolute certain those kids exist? Seriously, how? I use to think they were real but as time goes on…🤷🏻♀
I guess you got a quote for work being done at your place or that would have been an expensive chat with your builder. 😂😂
Shouldnt Archie be starting school this august/september?.
He's been in pre school. A few rare comments have been clocked by other parents.
@@kathrynimhoff344 that's not true at all and you know it. 😔
It's Ashli / Danja Zone ❤had a good source named Jay who confirmed the presence of a child living with Hazbeen and wife in CA. When it was supposed to be Arche.
Sorry. But lovely Ashley passed away before California. Are you a bot?
Don't be so rude,,, Sueforte,,,how old is alleged Archie? Lovely Ashlie was around from the very beginning,, R.I.P Ashlie?🙏😥 I remember her saying she had a good source named Jay too Kathy🤔
Which video is that? Provide a date of ashlis video saying this from Jay because we don't believe you
@sueforte4947
No, she did not.
Ashley Sloane passed away in August of 2022. Her channel, first known as "Danja Zone" and later as "It's Ashli" is still on UA-cam.
Lady C did say the RF can’t discuss MM private medical information even the RF w all their power and influence by law can’t disclose any of MM medical information……
She did say that but it rings hollow. It seemed to me the Queen did as she pleased bc, well,she was Queen. She didn’t abuse her power but she used it when necessary. Charles has shown himself to be weak thus far.
IF there is an " archie" - WHO BIRTHED him? WHOSE DNA does he carry? THIS DETERMINES HIS ELIGIBILITY TO THE LOS.
I Agree with T&T 's theory- IF he is real - he may be harry's- through an illicit affair.
There may be MANY archie bunkers, IMO 😅
I’m so sick of everyone saying That Eugenie let them use her child Archie is 3. 1/2 yrs older than her child it’s ridiculous
Bookie I feel that you must realise the rf don’t want you nor anyone to know the facts 🤔
Not even those who know don’t want to say , even you 🤷♀️
I think it’s all such a drama !
I feel that mm is not the only one that lies & not just about this ?! 🤔
Jmo
🤗
@evapavlou5296: some people do know some facts (with proof/receipts) but not necessarily the truth of how everything fits together. My suggestion is to write to KP, not BP, asking for an official answer how to deal with their knowledge. Publicise or what? The reply would be most interesting. But it could expose the informer in an unwanted way. BTW, I am sure the Press is in this position, their research and archives are awesome.
Good lord the middle picture looks like a baby Marcus….or Nacho
The child in the caption is Gavin Gingras who is the son of Brynn Gingras and Adrian Melia, not an alleged child called Archie.
It just be possible for experts in macular / facial constriction to determine whether all the images of A we have seen are of the same person??
And we want proof but the Real Royal Family has to have incredible evidence
This is my opinion you know something let it out, i hate the dripping of the tap, it's time the world know that we were fooled. The are way passed their expiration date lets go already tell the truth and be done with it just saying.
Bookworm we have asked the question but they keep passing by by by
oh! I hate my cryptic notes to self!
I thought the person who saw archie in the background on a zoom call that contacted you was a maid or nanny. Or maybe it was another channel? Im not sure but i do remember hearing about that story, but instead of it being a distant relative, it was a maid/nanny.
Paula M channel. The maid info
Maybe Archie has a lazy eye. That’s n good to a narcissist
Loads of babys have a lazy eye, most grow out of it.
I’m sure The Tindles
😂boekie al loop n leuen ook hoe snel die waarheid agterhaal hom wel so kom ons wag en kyk wat gebeur groete
IMO the Realm would not put up with Archie becoming King! In any way shape or form!
DNA proof??
DNA will only show who are the genetic/ biological parents NOT who gave birth to them 🤷♀️ #sussexbabyscam 🤬🤬🤬🇬🇧
100% agree.
Sick of the Harkles stupid games they act like silly pair of Juviniles
BUT IF THE ANSWER...IS YES.... SHE HAS TO PROOF IT WELL...HOSPITAL...NAME DE DRS
I do tend to agree with you.
❤
Exactly why hide it ..
Who is CRT please
Is that kid cross eyed?
Booky my darling, Meghan going to a market with a child isn't informative or unusual. You must be more specific. Was she seen with a child under the age of ten or was she seen with a child under the age of 45?😁 Love the videos, keep them coming.
What about Rosanne Barr saying Alexandra grey is the surrogate mother
I hadn’t t heard that but I trust Roseanne
@@DanaDakota i subsribe to prime royal monarchy and its on there piers morgan is talking with Rosanne and she reckons shes seen the evidence. Who knows maybe its true or maybe not
Hi,,,I,LL look that up...check out a post by O.M.G!916. Community posts,,,,she puts up good info, she does meditation. And has appeared on a Tarot readers channel,,,a long while back,,,what she has to say is totally believable🤔
❤❤
I still don’t buy this.
to be honest I don't think anyone cares, it will all come out at some point, they are of no concern at this time,
Lady C keeps saying: Harry’s children! And Meghan has something to do with them.
Not believing that there are any children at this point. Lady C may have been used to spread misinformation
She calls M their 'legal mother' not their birth mother.
I don’t listen to everything lady C says
@@jennifergriggs2613 Not only do I not listen, I don't believe a word out of that deranged narcissist's mouth
♥️♥️♥️👏🏻👍🏻👏🏻♥️♥️♥️🇺🇸
It is not “hidden”, any of it. Why are you so bothered about the British line of succession?
I think it is ridiculous to say because he is not born of the body Archie can not be in the line of succession. Born of the body WILL be updated to modern day age. As Long As the Child as both Parents DNA 100 percent is all that matters.
Not at all,,,the child has to be born of the body!! In order to be in line of succession😯
Well, that's the question, isn't it. If he does have both H and M's DNA that's one good thing, at least, but it's not enough. As British law currently stands, an adopted child, even if it is your own biological product, cannot inherit your titles, and when the Marquess and Marchioness very recently tested this in court for their own second son, born in 2016 via IVF/surrogate but biologically their own, they failed to carry the day. Even when it's wrong, it's the law, and H&M have broken it if Archie is theirs but born clandestinely via a surrogate. As the previous video on this subject explained, they could have been open about the surrogacy and sought to get the law changed, but that would have been a very long process taking several years, with an uncertain outcome, and they didn't want to take the risk of being unsuccessful. They wanted to have a fully 'royal' child, so they cheated - allegedly. If so, that is a legal problem.
As bizarre as it seems, I often suspect that haznone and the soho mattress ho are not married.
Remember, they did not use their full names during the wedding service.
Also, Archie's birth certificate was altered - the name of the mother was initially entered as that of the soho mattress ho BUT was changed to Duchess of Sussex.
So, who is the legitimate Duchess of Sussex?
Anything is possible with those two,,I know they did,nt say the correct names when they got married,,however I think it only matters what names they sign in the marriage certificate,,,although I think they could have already been married previously,,and that she actually been telling the truth for once,,when she said so in DOPRAH interview,,, and that is why she was allowed to go to Sandringham with R,F,,at Christmas time,,,when no other girlfriend had been🤔 in my opinion,,,
that would actually make sense. harry is legally married to the birth mother, the legitimate duchess of sussex, so the kids are in Los as they are of the body.
that is why hm 'married' so quickly. hm had to cover for the baby harry already had. and that is what m has over H and the rf. 😮 far fetched and crazy but could it be true?
@@zeboston2317 Hi it's the only way this combination of events makes sense to me? Hopefully someone has the hpnour to tell the truth soon.
Some of us felt when she was in the service of her latest marriage with the idiot that this would not end well. Her demeanour, her families behavior and her guest list said way more than most believed.