I v. Kyle Rittenhouse Trial Day 4 - Direct Exam of Jason Lackowski - Friend of Ryan Balch

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 25 лис 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 521

  • @omarharo3132
    @omarharo3132 3 роки тому +66

    Young Americans did the job the government didn't do that day.

    • @lastmadcow
      @lastmadcow 3 роки тому

      young instigators killed 2 innocent men.

    • @op3488
      @op3488 3 роки тому +1

      @@lastmadcow I wouldn't call a convicted pa3dophile and, a convicted aggressive abuser innocent! Nor would I call them "men"

    • @anagramconfirmed1717
      @anagramconfirmed1717 3 роки тому +2

      @@lastmadcow it's a shame he only bagged two "innocent" men.

    • @dylan-5287
      @dylan-5287 2 роки тому

      @@lastmadcow innocent men don't form a mob, attempt to burn down and destroy other people's livelihoods, and chase down a fleeing teenager and try to murder him on the street. Most people don't do that, especially innocent men.

    • @rauldiaz4673
      @rauldiaz4673 4 місяці тому

      @@lastmadcow innocent men?? Both have criminal records. One of them was a child molester. Get your facts straight 💯

  • @froggitylumpus3805
    @froggitylumpus3805 3 роки тому +58

    "Cranium that dude" shouted the prosecutions star witnesses....

  • @basedgaming2585
    @basedgaming2585 3 роки тому +61

    This judge is awesome!

    • @LogicalReasons
      @LogicalReasons 3 роки тому +8

      I'm glad someone else noticed this. He's the only reason I keep watching

  • @WellsLarry
    @WellsLarry 3 роки тому +64

    At this point, unless the jury has been stacked where Kyle never had a chance, there will not be a guilty verdict.

    • @WellsLarry
      @WellsLarry 3 роки тому +11

      @Ray Trammell And he is a true hero.

    • @osodmoney8807
      @osodmoney8807 3 роки тому +3

      I agree

    • @venuss2000
      @venuss2000 3 роки тому +10

      If we're all being honest and not listening to the corrupt media and *ONLY* going off the facts & testimonials from the trial, there's NO WAY you can convict on the murder charges. NONE!!

    • @osodmoney8807
      @osodmoney8807 3 роки тому +4

      @@venuss2000 I agree

    • @redblankie1219
      @redblankie1219 3 роки тому +2

      He'll get convicted on carrying illegally and being past curfew for sure

  • @vintagebeliever5023
    @vintagebeliever5023 3 роки тому +24

    True heroes trying to protect their city, since no one else did.

  • @brianisus
    @brianisus 3 роки тому +32

    This court needs to seriously consider hiring an IT consultant.

    • @Khyrid
      @Khyrid 3 роки тому +2

      Exactly what I was thinking. They can't even see the time stamp when scrubbing through the video.

    • @MM-uv6vk
      @MM-uv6vk 3 роки тому

      Prosecution team too

    • @Khyrid
      @Khyrid 3 роки тому +1

      They got vlc now it looks like.

  • @motorcyclemike1299
    @motorcyclemike1299 3 роки тому +25

    It sounds like the prosecutor is the defendants lawyer.

  • @gaigegrosskreutzmissingbic5591
    @gaigegrosskreutzmissingbic5591 3 роки тому +76

    Why is the prosecution calling witnesses that literally say the opposite of what they're trying to push?

    • @MrLeebyunghun
      @MrLeebyunghun 3 роки тому +14

      I was a tad confused about this as well...I guess to try to destroy the character and deem his testimony bs....but dude day 4 these witnesses r blowing up in the states face.

    • @gaigegrosskreutzmissingbic5591
      @gaigegrosskreutzmissingbic5591 3 роки тому +2

      @@MrLeebyunghun it's remarkable the state even did this. It's completely reprehensible they allowed this to happen if they're actually trying to get him convicted.

    • @jeremybradshaw6723
      @jeremybradshaw6723 3 роки тому +16

      Innocent

    • @nedalsalman6864
      @nedalsalman6864 3 роки тому +18

      Because it's a bad case in nature. And should have never been charged. But this D.A is trying to make it a emotional trial. And a trial based on gun culture or should I say ANTI GUN CULTURE. AND PRO POLICE STATE.

    • @MrLeebyunghun
      @MrLeebyunghun 3 роки тому +8

      @Terri Walsh get real terri.

  • @charmaylily2176
    @charmaylily2176 3 роки тому +38

    This poor kid is so NOT GUILTY its so sad hes even having to go thru this!! And Jason Lackowski also knows & feels that Kyle is INNOCENT

  • @FISHH00KS
    @FISHH00KS 3 роки тому +74

    Q: What is your profession?
    A: I'm a full time student at the Aurora Psychiatric Hospital
    Q: Wait, are you a patient or studying
    A: Yes, potato salad

  • @keeterscotch8792
    @keeterscotch8792 3 роки тому +62

    This is stunning. It’s almost as if the state is attempting to intentionally blow this case. Either that or, the state attorneys are that incompetent.

    • @basedgaming2585
      @basedgaming2585 3 роки тому +40

      Maybe they had a weak case to begin with :3

    • @Beaskii
      @Beaskii 3 роки тому +33

      @@basedgaming2585 they had no case to begin with

    • @cagoodson70
      @cagoodson70 3 роки тому +2

      They are doing just that.

    • @marcuslarwa9098
      @marcuslarwa9098 3 роки тому +1

      What do u think it is? I mean he asked if the dude was armed and the witness said no. Then he proceeded to ask if he had about 6-7 different types of weapons. The dude already said he had nothing on him other then a bag, wtf is the point to asked about all the other weapons.

    • @ref889900
      @ref889900 3 роки тому +2

      Truth is like a lion, set it free and it will defend itself

  • @thebewitchinghour831
    @thebewitchinghour831 3 роки тому +41

    Both attorneys:
    Is run away or retreat in your commands?
    NO
    Are you trained to head for the hills?
    NO
    Run away from them and try to get yourself out of the situation that you're in?
    NO
    Did you consider him a threat?
    NO
    Did you feel like he posed any danger to you or anyone else?
    NO
    Did you view him as a threat?
    NOT AT ALL
    He's a MARINE.

    • @ryanbuckley5529
      @ryanbuckley5529 3 роки тому +2

      Oh man🤣 thanks for this, that’s what I was thinking the entire time! My brother, dad and many of my friends are marines. Some hard core MFs!!! Also the nicest people I’ve ever met! So this just made my laugh pretty good!😂

  • @permrussiatoday
    @permrussiatoday 3 роки тому +8

    Defense in quiet consultation "Never interfere with your adversary while they are in the process of destroying themselves"

  • @CODYORMOE
    @CODYORMOE 3 роки тому +28

    Kyle is a political prisoner and this was a malicious prosecution. Hope Kyle sues the city and state after he’s acquitted.

    • @CaliCarpetbagger
      @CaliCarpetbagger 11 місяців тому

      Yeah, because political prisoners get due process, a jury of his peers that found him innocent, and then released to go on and make money off of talking about the crimes he was acquitted of. You clowns are too much

  • @patrickburton5870
    @patrickburton5870 3 роки тому +45

    It would have not gotten this far if the Mayor and the police would have done their jobs. A good police chief would have ignored the mayor's orders to stand down.

    • @vintagebeliever5023
      @vintagebeliever5023 3 роки тому +4

      Exactly my thoughts

    • @laceyjade9834
      @laceyjade9834 3 роки тому +1

      Let’s be realistic though… Had they not followed those orders, more people would’ve been injured & likely killed. People were too emotional on both sides. That would’ve just been a battle in a long-standing war. The mayor was trying to keep everyone safe imo.

    • @TheMattTrakker
      @TheMattTrakker 3 роки тому +2

      @@laceyjade9834 Yeah, appeasement has always been a sound strategy...oh wait.

    • @laceyjade9834
      @laceyjade9834 3 роки тому +1

      @@TheMattTrakker It’s not about appeasement. It’s about safety. If you think sending in all available law enforcement, who already have a vendetta, against civilians who also have a vendetta wouldn’t have turned into a blood bath, you’re naive.

    • @MaziBiafra
      @MaziBiafra 3 роки тому +1

      What about the governor who ignored Mr @realDonaldTrump advise for national guard to be sent to wisconsin to maintain law order?

  • @jeffcooper9403
    @jeffcooper9403 3 роки тому +24

    NOT GUILTY. SELF DEFENSE.

  • @animeshroypainter
    @animeshroypainter 3 роки тому +14

    when can we watch a trial of all the 'bad guys'?!!

  • @kevinmurphy468
    @kevinmurphy468 3 роки тому +13

    This guy and Kyle should get a medal I would think the KPD would like to have these guys on their team So thank you both for standing up to these domestic threats, Keep up the good work!!

    • @Rg-cf1ix
      @Rg-cf1ix 3 роки тому

      Yea she should have been at capital to take out the republican Jan 6 terrorist too

  • @Khyrid
    @Khyrid 3 роки тому +34

    Court sounds like:
    Attorney: "And on that day you wore two shoes, correct? And you tied your own shoes, not somebody tired them for you?"
    Other Attorney: "Objection! He is trying to lead the witness!"

    • @Jordan23-45
      @Jordan23-45 3 роки тому

      Huh?

    • @Jordan23-45
      @Jordan23-45 3 роки тому

      Do you realize how much back and forth there just was in this video? What you took from it was one side saying objection? YOU NEED SERIOUS SERIOUS HELP.

  • @johnathanbusse4679
    @johnathanbusse4679 3 роки тому +32

    The defense sitting over there like.....the prosecution copied our homework lol.

  • @fides249
    @fides249 3 роки тому +6

    The judge reminds of the late actor Peter Boyle who acted as
    Raymond’s father in the TV series “Everybody Loves Raymond”.

    • @junkievideo
      @junkievideo 3 роки тому

      That was my thought from day 1. He talks and looks like him

  • @06treehunter
    @06treehunter 3 роки тому +17

    Is it just me or does the Prosecutor have a "Rebel Alliance" pin on his jacket.

    • @JC-vo5dt
      @JC-vo5dt 3 роки тому +2

      @Ray Trammell Putin gave it to him to remember CCCP.

  • @JDPWALLACE
    @JDPWALLACE 3 роки тому +24

    As serious as this matter is, why would a grown man have his hair styled like that? Hi, I'm the prosecutor don't take me serious.

  • @thesillysisters1383
    @thesillysisters1383 3 роки тому +4

    He’s the biggest, most arrogant, egomaniac attorney (which is most insulting). His demeanor in court will be his downfall. I would dread to hang out with this man and talk to him in an ordinary situation. 🤮

  • @OneLaw214
    @OneLaw214 3 роки тому +7

    How ironic, the Prosecutor is curious as to why the witness made an assumption! Why didn't he disqualify his "Crime Scene Specialist" for a multitude of assumptions while the prosecution seems to have assumed they have a homicide instead of what they have being self defense.

  • @SaxonC
    @SaxonC 3 роки тому +6

    At this point, I believe that the prosecution wanted to get a mistrial because I can’t fathom how any attorney for the state, would perform this badly in front of millions of people! lol

  • @nigelbrayshaw2709
    @nigelbrayshaw2709 Рік тому +1

    "Alright Joseph, congratulations on making it all the way to the bonus round.
    Well let's see if you can't make everyone proud!
    The catagory is - 'People Who Annoy you'''
    "Okay, I'd like a B an N and a G"
    "Looks like you're going to get a lot of help here. Catagory is; 'People Who Annoy you' - Audience, keep quiet please"
    "Errrr......well, errr"
    "10 seconds Mr Rosenbaum......"
    "I know it but I don't think I should say it"
    "5 seconds Mr Rosenbaum"
    "Alright I'd like to solve the puzzle......
    BINGER!"

    • @presto709
      @presto709 11 місяців тому

      I see what you did there. lol

  • @getlitlightingpyrotechnics7181
    @getlitlightingpyrotechnics7181 3 роки тому +28

    false stepping and yelling shoot me n*** is absolutely threatening behavior...

    • @thuggeegaming659
      @thuggeegaming659 3 роки тому

      No no no no. Especially when the person is unarmed.

    • @otisbigsby
      @otisbigsby 3 роки тому +10

      @@thuggeegaming659 well he wasn’t shot then. He was shot later while actively trying to assault a minor (again) and take his firearm.

    • @thuggeegaming659
      @thuggeegaming659 3 роки тому +2

      @@jenkins7172 Incorrect. Unarmed is unarmed.

    • @thuggeegaming659
      @thuggeegaming659 3 роки тому +2

      @@otisbigsby Incorrect, he was shot and murdered. That's objective fact.

    • @smalls3187
      @smalls3187 3 роки тому +9

      @@thuggeegaming659 reaching for a persons firearm is considered a threat and the shooting is justified as self defense.

  • @lagon7830
    @lagon7830 3 роки тому +29

    All the prosecutions witnesses hurt their case, I love it.

    • @amyk5122
      @amyk5122 3 роки тому +2

      Sure do. They are making it easy for the defense

    • @rhymereason3449
      @rhymereason3449 3 роки тому +3

      How is Lackdowski declaring that he found Rosenbaum not to be a threat at all (to the extent that he turned his back on him) hurting the prosecution's case?

    • @amyk5122
      @amyk5122 3 роки тому +8

      @@rhymereason3449 lunging for someone in a threatening way and towards their weapon is a threat.

    • @rhymereason3449
      @rhymereason3449 3 роки тому +3

      @@amyk5122: No... this "I get to blow you away when you didn't even touch me" logic is a very dangerous escalation being promoted by gun proponents. Let's say you have a gun in your back pocket, and I "lunge" at you and you sidestep me and no contact is made. Do you really think you should get to blow me away based on nothing but a FEAR that I might eventually get your gun? I can't accept that... there should AT LEAST be physical contact involved. You don't know if I'm even going to try again... should LETHAL FORCE be applied on nothing but the SPECULATION that things might get worse?

    • @leemiller5194
      @leemiller5194 3 роки тому +3

      @@rhymereason3449 being unreceptive to the truth doesn't make it go away bro

  • @FrankE.Stein-nh2mm
    @FrankE.Stein-nh2mm 3 роки тому +10

    So does this guy know he's the prosecution?

    • @KYLgonk
      @KYLgonk 3 роки тому +1

      Maybe he isn't convinced of Kyle's guilt, so he's deliberately playing dumb.

  • @FISHH00KS
    @FISHH00KS 3 роки тому +17

    THE STATE NEVER HAD A CASE - THIS SHOULD NEVER HAVE SEEN A COURTROOM - THIS IS A POLITICALLY MOTIVATED CASE - THIS IS AN ABOMINATION TO JUSTICE

  • @lydiasinclair1126
    @lydiasinclair1126 3 роки тому +7

    Not guilty!!

  • @leegilar2730
    @leegilar2730 3 роки тому +9

    Does anyone else see Gary Oldman questioning Tom Cruise?

    • @daeryram
      @daeryram 3 роки тому

      Binger reminds me that mad prosecutor from Leon movie!

  • @joellowery
    @joellowery 3 роки тому +11

    state prosecution sounds like it's their first case...

  • @scivirus3563
    @scivirus3563 3 роки тому +2

    it that Prosecutor Binger wearing a Star Wars Rebel Alliance Pin ? Bet he loves Ep 7 to 9

    • @menzicosce
      @menzicosce 3 роки тому +1

      He literally works for the Empire though lol

  • @julie198
    @julie198 3 роки тому +10

    Is the prosecution putting on Kyles defense for him?

  • @charlietoole8707
    @charlietoole8707 3 роки тому +16

    Binger's milkin this for every second of screen time he can get.
    Well, his office paid a bunch for that hairdo, guess they want to show it off.

    • @hawaiifiveohoh
      @hawaiifiveohoh 3 роки тому +1

      When I first started watching the trial, I thought he and his office was incompetent. I figured out he's on the side of Justice , and what's right. He's going to get his charges , but it won't be on Rittenhouse.

    • @anagramconfirmed1717
      @anagramconfirmed1717 3 роки тому

      @@hawaiifiveohoh im open to listening. What do you mean?

  • @blast3028
    @blast3028 3 роки тому +4

    is that a star wars pin lmao

  • @eugenesant9015
    @eugenesant9015 3 роки тому +9

    Very noble of them to defend some millionaire foreigners cars when that
    Owner didn't have the balls to be there with them. Should have let it burn.

  • @amyk5122
    @amyk5122 3 роки тому +7

    The defense can just sit there and win. This case is a joke.

  • @AAAskeet
    @AAAskeet 3 роки тому +14

    What a waste of time.Not guilty x infinity

  • @HappySlaveOfChrist
    @HappySlaveOfChrist 3 роки тому +1

    If we’re going to clarify that the AR-15 is “semi-automatic” why not make the same clarification with Gaige’s gun, huh?

  • @lianecornils8733
    @lianecornils8733 3 роки тому +2

    Tonight I think of many better life scenarios then what I had to live. But I'm thankful I'm not Kyle or his mom tonight.

  • @Eliezer1018
    @Eliezer1018 3 роки тому +15

    They attacked Kyle simply because of all the armed men who were there he seemed to be the youngest, and most inexperienced by looks. This was the error in judgment and it cost them them life. Self defense plan and simple. Justified shooting.

  • @soniatita9856
    @soniatita9856 3 роки тому +5

    The prosecutor's tie looks like a table cloth. But l don't know about his hair.

  • @jackfullerton5762
    @jackfullerton5762 3 роки тому +3

    An anarchist using the words "burn down" sounds like they're influenced by Sen. Schumer. 14:00 Prosecutor leaves out the matter of doing the false stepping, being a motion done quickly. 22:51

  • @rclines001
    @rclines001 3 роки тому +8

    Yet again, they got nothing on Kyle. Absolutely nothing.

    • @ucantrun4ever461
      @ucantrun4ever461 3 роки тому +6

      Except for fact that he shot and killed people with a gun he shouldn't have had. Yea absolutely nothing. 🥱

    • @talonauvil7952
      @talonauvil7952 3 роки тому +5

      @@ucantrun4ever461 when people attempt to take your weapon from you after chasing you and threatening to kill you that is a justifiable shoot. Run up to a cop and try to take his gun and see what happens. Letting someone cease your weapon can be deadly to you and everyone around you especially when they’ve made their intent known. This is clear cut self defense

    • @ucantrun4ever461
      @ucantrun4ever461 3 роки тому +4

      @@talonauvil7952 Please stop jumping over the facts the he shouldn't have had to gun to begin with.

    • @JohnnieWalkerDread
      @JohnnieWalkerDread 3 роки тому +1

      @@ucantrun4ever461 Actually, the judge will probably rule on the gun charge right before the jury deliberates. My gut feeling is that he will throw the gun charge out.

    • @ucantrun4ever461
      @ucantrun4ever461 3 роки тому +1

      @@JohnnieWalkerDread That's fine since the Feds will without a doubt charge him with the gun.

  • @bigdogpete43
    @bigdogpete43 3 роки тому +1

    A true Patriot on the stand there.

  • @mollyshredder
    @mollyshredder 3 роки тому

    "shout, shove, show, shoot!" Chilling

    • @mollyshredder
      @mollyshredder 2 роки тому

      @@rigel1744 not really. That too is scary but in a disorganized way. His statement "shout, shove, show, shoot" indicates intent.

  • @ART224
    @ART224 3 роки тому +1

    Funny how the judge chastised him for saying “a-hole” but others on the stand went way further than that with their language.

    • @garylake1676
      @garylake1676 3 роки тому +2

      It was because they were Lakowski's own words to describe a certain section of the crowd, not repeating words that he had heard others say, there is a big difference between using swear words from a third party then there is using them yourself to describe others in court, troublemakers, idiots, a-holes, first two are ok, last is not.

    • @ART224
      @ART224 3 роки тому +1

      @@garylake1676 Good point. One thing I respect about court is that a certain level of dignity, procedure, and honor must be maintained.

  • @masspence1
    @masspence1 3 роки тому +5

    This former Marine is a very credible witness compared to others .

  • @donpost9462
    @donpost9462 3 роки тому +1

    Isn't it amazing how the people who are there to protect and defend a business are running around like as my father would say a chicken with his head cut off, they sure did a lot of protecting !

  • @mariefremlin7536
    @mariefremlin7536 3 роки тому +5

    Where's the ballistic evidence on the 9mm? Was the 9mm an illegal gun? Had it been fired that night? What about swabs of hands that would show evidence of firing a weapon? What about private video surveillance? These buildings had to have cameras.

  • @jakecozzz1040
    @jakecozzz1040 3 роки тому +1

    I feel like Jason and the DA had a little chat before court. I feel like he's trying to make the threats seem less severe and throw Kyle under the bus for the gun.
    Edit: Kyle needs better friends. Young man is fighting for his life that day and this day and his "friend" plays down everything Kyle went thru. Thanks for your service Rambo.

    • @TheAzmountaineer
      @TheAzmountaineer 3 роки тому +2

      This guy and Ryan Balch had never met Kyle before and should not be considered friends. More like temporary associates for that night. But I agree, he seems to have a problem with Kyle or at maybe just some contempt. Binger claimed Balch lied, but he had no reason to lie (except maybe when he lost track of Kyle, which allowed the whole Rosenbaum thing to happen). He barely knew Rittenhouse.

    • @dylan-5287
      @dylan-5287 2 роки тому

      Guaranteed they talked, Binger talked to every witness. He wouldn't have threatened him but probably had a conversation saying someone needs to be guilty and that's Kyle, but if not, then maybe they start looking at others there..

  • @christiesteyn1980
    @christiesteyn1980 3 роки тому +1

    17:58 to former soldier = the top of the map is north.

  • @jeffreyrosas1784
    @jeffreyrosas1784 3 роки тому +2

    6:03 10 45
    14:28 rosenbaum
    15:04 jr not arson
    20:34. Observed jr just the one incident.
    20:47 jr asked to shoot him. False stepping babbling idiot no shirt, something over his head.
    26:47 6 feet
    27:41 put out fires multiple
    29:54 fires after “the incident”
    31:47 on car lot heard gunshots
    33:16 gunfire behind me.
    44:23 10:45 pm.
    45:01 flashlight
    52:18 on the corner of 59th and Sheridan “shoot me n”
    54:25 Never said ‘if I get you alone you are dead
    1:01:45 does not recall ‘cranium’

  • @racerdan7
    @racerdan7 3 роки тому

    Who in the world actually wrote the caption for this video, specifically the part about Kyle?

  • @james123stewart
    @james123stewart 3 роки тому +3

    where do they get these guys??????

  • @peterdobson3435
    @peterdobson3435 3 роки тому +4

    I am waiting form them to come out and say that the kid has a baby face and that bullies will think him a pushover on the basis of those baby face looks.

  • @stephenrines1509
    @stephenrines1509 3 роки тому

    Wow..

  • @kawikadee9670
    @kawikadee9670 3 роки тому +2

    1.9 gpa prosecutor.

  • @FISHH00KS
    @FISHH00KS 3 роки тому +8

    The DA offered a plea deal ~ plead guilty to loitering or littering (your choice) and a $2.00 fine.
    Rittenhouse: No

  • @GWRick-ld7rj
    @GWRick-ld7rj 3 роки тому

    Shout, Shove, Show and Shoot . . .!
    Did Rittenhouse use that method when he shot Rosenbaum and Huber ?

    • @jamescarrigan2001
      @jamescarrigan2001 3 роки тому +3

      he Shouted "friendly friendly friendly" ...he may not have been able to SHOVE or he may have tried...he SHOWED because more than one of them reached for the gun... and he SHOT obviously.

    • @venuss2000
      @venuss2000 3 роки тому +6

      He was being attacked when he shot them. Don't attack people with firearms🤷🏿‍♀️

    • @seewulf2385
      @seewulf2385 3 роки тому

      @@venuss2000 wait..what..??

    • @JCinerea
      @JCinerea 3 роки тому +1

      Did he have the time in which to do that? Was he trained to do that? Nooooope......

  • @johneurek8181
    @johneurek8181 3 роки тому +5

    The other witness left Kyle alone and didn’t follow the buddy system.
    - I wondered from day 1, why was Kyle alone. Now we know who let him down.

    • @james123stewart
      @james123stewart 3 роки тому +2

      He said Kyle dipped. Thought he was still behind him.When he wasn't, thought in store, wasn't. Looked for him outside....Kyle kills less than 5 minutes later.

    • @james123stewart
      @james123stewart 3 роки тому

      what is with the movement??

    • @jimwheeler6094
      @jimwheeler6094 3 роки тому +2

      @@james123stewart, yes exactly, if you view the video taken by Richie McGinnis in which he interviews Kyle Rittenhouse, Kyle is following Ryan Balch. Apparently Ryan needed to have put Kyle on a leash so that he wouldn't have wandered off.

    • @james123stewart
      @james123stewart 3 роки тому

      @@jimwheeler6094 yup

    • @james123stewart
      @james123stewart 3 роки тому

      @@jimwheeler6094 finally someone else see's.....he had been looked after until he was able to shake him. Believe he had checked kyle for engaging already. Total b s connection to car lots. At least that is what they are saying in court. After the first unrest, better believe not much left on site that was not insured. The "medical" shouts got called out by guys KYLE passes and quickly moves on....as they were callin b s .
      Kyle is an immature misguided child that should not have had weapon. (he lied and told ppl he was 19). They are being tricked by police by their lack of enforcement.
      Now he will be locked up.

  • @mariefremlin7536
    @mariefremlin7536 3 роки тому +3

    FBI has this man scared to death. You can see how terrified he is if he says the wrong thing his life is in danger.

    • @markmack2746
      @markmack2746 3 роки тому +1

      The fbi has who scared to death. Sounds like you are delusional and living in a alternate reality.

    • @mariefremlin7536
      @mariefremlin7536 3 роки тому +2

      @@markmack2746 sounds like you are an fbi shill. 🤣

    • @mariefremlin7536
      @mariefremlin7536 3 роки тому +1

      @@markmack2746 clearly you didn't hear him say the fbi interviewed him. Why him? If you think fbi are your buddy, good luck to you.

    • @jsphblw
      @jsphblw 3 роки тому

      @@mariefremlin7536 - They interviewed him and everyone more than a year ago to establish fact about the riots. A lot of the people who appeared on the witness stand in the case were interviewed by the FBI. They didn’t seem nervous or shaken. This man’s just a nervous person by nature.

  • @markmack2746
    @markmack2746 3 роки тому +4

    the kenosha hat trick

  • @ravenrisby
    @ravenrisby 3 роки тому +4

    The marine thinks he’s a big bad boy lol

  • @craigoutdoors30
    @craigoutdoors30 3 роки тому +1

    Guy at 47 min seems less than brilliant

  • @Longi1974
    @Longi1974 10 місяців тому

    12:34 "A-Holes" 😆

  • @kevwhit7058
    @kevwhit7058 3 роки тому +3

    Also, this witness shows the mind frame of the "protectors" that night. This kid didn't even know East from West!

    • @liberalssuck8425
      @liberalssuck8425 3 роки тому +3

      Has bicep boy showed up I want to see bicep boy

    • @stevedeakins416
      @stevedeakins416 3 роки тому

      @Ray Trammell If only there were some way he could've avoided finding himself in the middle of a violent mob.

    • @stevedeakins416
      @stevedeakins416 3 роки тому

      @Ray Trammell So your saying the cops weren't doing their job, so it was up to him?

  • @0h2ezy
    @0h2ezy 3 роки тому +12

    He said… aholes… chill judge… he was being respectful for a Marine

    • @armageddon1981
      @armageddon1981 3 роки тому

      As a retired marine myself, no lies there, i also had the same MOS as he did but i served from 99 to 01, my heart murmur was detected during a routine exam so i was given medical discharge, now i work for the railroad.

    • @chattahuffman5117
      @chattahuffman5117 3 роки тому +3

      NO. It is very disrespectful in any court of law. He should know better.

    • @armageddon1981
      @armageddon1981 3 роки тому +1

      @@chattahuffman5117 true they will only allow the use of it if it's permissible to explain a situation verbatim but other than that yep that's possible grounds for contempt.

    • @0h2ezy
      @0h2ezy 3 роки тому

      @@chattahuffman5117 again he didn’t use profanity… that was respectful

    • @chattahuffman5117
      @chattahuffman5117 3 роки тому +1

      @@0h2ezy Yes it was, as it was used in a derogatory manner. Absolutely should be admonished. And as a service member he should know a thing or two about showing respect.

  • @sevenexes7778
    @sevenexes7778 3 роки тому +6

    I can appreciate how the judge comes across as if he were just the guy in front of you in line at Tractor Supply. He’s got a tough case and he clearly wants everyone in the courtroom to feel a level of comfort and honesty. That being said….
    🇺🇸FREE KYLE RITTENHOUSE🇺🇸

  • @albertofernandez2490
    @albertofernandez2490 3 роки тому +4

    How old is this dude Jason? He looks 18-19, yet said he served in the Marine Corps 2012-2015. You must be at least 17 to enlist, which is a bit crazy BTW, so that would make him 26 at least.

    • @Jordan23-45
      @Jordan23-45 3 роки тому

      You think he looks 18? Geezus you're a bad source of judgement. Thank Christ you don't do it for a living.

    • @Derrick2shot
      @Derrick2shot 3 роки тому +5

      @@Jordan23-45 hes just saying Jason is an attractive gentleman

    • @brandontu226
      @brandontu226 3 роки тому

      @@Derrick2shot 🤨🤣

    • @jd0879
      @jd0879 2 роки тому

      He looks 18 to you? Lmao he looks 26-28 to me

  • @davet7509
    @davet7509 3 роки тому +5

    Is a 17 year old legally allowed to open carry a long gun in WI? I think the law says you must be 18 to open carry, but is that specific to hand guns or is that all guns?

    • @otisbigsby
      @otisbigsby 3 роки тому +2

      I believe there a clause for hunting.

    • @TheBuzzkill2012
      @TheBuzzkill2012 3 роки тому +19

      So the legality of carrying a gun, in this case, isn't too important. You do not, in all 50 states, lose your right to self defense if you possess a firearm illegally.

    • @Beaskii
      @Beaskii 3 роки тому +2

      What does The Constitution say?

    • @I_am_not_a_rob0t
      @I_am_not_a_rob0t 3 роки тому +7

      It is not only a right, but it is every American males duty to know how to own, maintain and safely and effectively operate a modern-day rifle. Saying a 17 year old isn’t old enough to carry a rifle is just sad. You should be taught to handle firearms at 12.

    • @ucantrun4ever461
      @ucantrun4ever461 3 роки тому +3

      @@I_am_not_a_rob0t I agree but unfortunately for Kyle that isn't the case.

  • @tiffanymartin7933
    @tiffanymartin7933 3 роки тому +2

    Question for those that know the regulation. Is it allowed for a 17 child to own a weapon in that state? How did he obtain the weapon if not lawful?

    • @RoyKoopaling
      @RoyKoopaling 3 роки тому +1

      It isn’t and his friend bought it for him. He will be found guilty of that crime, with no doubt.

    • @dylan-5287
      @dylan-5287 3 роки тому +8

      Kyle never actually owned the gun, it was in his friends name. Essentially the friend was holding it in trust for him and once he turned 18 they were going to do a private sale to transfer it to Kyle. Of course the media didn't really explain this, like everything else.. And it sounds like WI laws have an exemption for 16 and 17 year olds to open carry as long as it's a long gun, aka not a handgun or short barrel rifle.

    • @zombieepx1933
      @zombieepx1933 3 роки тому +1

      @@RoyKoopaling wouldn’t say with no doubt. The laws are muddy there for 17 year olds and long guns. In day 9 of the trial they had a conversation about Wisconsin Statute 29.304, so it’s not “without a doubt” considering that along with the police giving them permission to watch that specific area, and the city in a state of emergency.

    • @RoyKoopaling
      @RoyKoopaling 3 роки тому +1

      @@zombieepx1933 I agree, since my comment I’ve been reading up on this, and now think there’s actually a good argument for him to be found not guilty of this charge as well.

    • @KYLgonk
      @KYLgonk 3 роки тому

      Seemed like the only thing the prosecution might have a vague idea of, until during Rittenhouse's testimony the judge said that both Binger and Kyle's understanding of the law did not match reality.

  • @blabl590
    @blabl590 3 роки тому

    No shame

  • @blabl590
    @blabl590 3 роки тому +2

    Private pile just got a job at the da office

  • @metallitech
    @metallitech 3 роки тому +1

    1:07:14

  • @Shomealiens
    @Shomealiens 3 роки тому

    42:03 that's a lie. I watched the video cj had showing both Jason Lackowski and Ryan Balch the video of Kyle shooting all 3 individuals.
    During the questioning by "reporters", before they saw the video, both men accidently called the shooter "the medic" twice as they were recalling what they believed happened. (Though claimed they saw nothing). Jason Lackowski actually got defensive when the people there implied it was not self defense.

    • @rebeccatrishel
      @rebeccatrishel 3 роки тому +1

      Where's that video?
      Also they didn't want to snitch, good men

    • @Shomealiens
      @Shomealiens 3 роки тому

      @@rebeccatrishel some of it was played in court. But the prosecutor is an idiot apparently because they didnt show the part that shows perjury.
      It's in the CJTV video.

    • @rebeccatrishel
      @rebeccatrishel 3 роки тому

      @@Shomealiens Which video,though? Do you know the name?

  • @whodat7084
    @whodat7084 3 роки тому +2

    I stopped watching the “news” a little before these riots. I can’t imagine how much worse it would’ve been without all these patriots protecting the businesses. Hats off to everyone that fought the good fight 🇺🇸❤️

  • @stevedeakins416
    @stevedeakins416 3 роки тому +10

    36:00
    So Rittenhouse ran up to this dude and said, "I didn't shoot anybody!"
    That's the testimony?😂😂😂😂

  • @davidduckett535
    @davidduckett535 3 роки тому +4

    conveniently blacked out, to avoid telling what he saw Rittenhouse doing

  • @kevwhit7058
    @kevwhit7058 3 роки тому +3

    Question.... how are armed teenagers supposed to help defuse an already hostile situation?!?🤔🤔🤔

    • @DMJ160
      @DMJ160 3 роки тому +6

      probably about as much as rioters, burners, looters taking to the streets after a questionable shooting by police. Good question Kev.

    • @snaker9er
      @snaker9er 3 роки тому +11

      By defending themselves and property while cowards hide in the fetal position and criticize better people with more courage

    • @JohnnieWalkerDread
      @JohnnieWalkerDread 3 роки тому +1

      @@snaker9er Nailed it.

    • @TheTreegodfather
      @TheTreegodfather 3 роки тому +3

      @@DMJ160 ... And the police shooting turned out to be not really questionable after all.

    • @DMJ160
      @DMJ160 3 роки тому

      @@TheTreegodfather I agree to a point. I just thought 7 shots were a bit excessive. Would it still be an issue with some if it were just 1 shot? Im guessing the potential for a riot would still be possible.

  • @joshrauckman7058
    @joshrauckman7058 3 роки тому +6

    FREE KYLE!!!!

  • @plasticman3952
    @plasticman3952 3 роки тому

    If you were guarding a building. Why were you on the street and in direct contact with the rioters Mr. Lackowski?

    • @dylan-5287
      @dylan-5287 2 роки тому

      Why were there rioters out there in the first place? They should have brought in the national guard and immediately arrested every single one of those domestic terrorists who believed they can burn, loot, and murder without any regard for the law. It's unfortunate things worked out the way they did. The police and law enforcement failed to secure the situation and private citizens had to come in to bring order. They were burning whole car lots down the first night, once these guys showed up that all stopped.

  • @chrisw7188
    @chrisw7188 3 роки тому

    jason reminds me of ben shapiro

  • @BlackDogOriginal
    @BlackDogOriginal 3 роки тому +3

    Beautiful self defense

  • @Chupria
    @Chupria 3 роки тому +1

    It's funny how laywers think that they have to describe everything with words as if there is no video recording of the trial. Like dude, if someone wanted to review this case 100 years from now, they can see the video, you don't need to use words to describe a certain action.

    • @laceyjade9834
      @laceyjade9834 3 роки тому +4

      It’s for the transcript. Regardless of audio or video which can be edited, court transcripts cannot be. Transcripts are still what’s used in appeals & other court related proceedings. So, yes it needs to be described for the record.

    • @Chupria
      @Chupria 3 роки тому

      @@laceyjade9834 Perhaps its time to update the process. Its very outdated given the advancements of tech. Transcripts can also be written incorrectly, and misinterpreted given the complexity of human speech.

    • @jd0879
      @jd0879 2 роки тому +2

      Spoken like someone who doesn’t know a thing about law. 1) The jury needs to have the full picture, it’s rare that a case has as much video evidence as this one does 2) It’s for the transcript, people refer to them in text either in school or in hearing 3) It’s to remove all ambiguity

    • @Chupria
      @Chupria 2 роки тому

      @@jd0879 Doubt anyone will continue to read the transcripts when there is 4K video.

  • @james123stewart
    @james123stewart 3 роки тому +4

    what is off about this guy??

    • @james123stewart
      @james123stewart 3 роки тому +2

      @DrDavid BonnarIII lol
      that is its own deal. I am speaking about the vet. Just....something off. plus the movements. Not saying bad...just off.

  • @ianfisher7423
    @ianfisher7423 3 роки тому

    militarized civilians sometimes seem a bit unhinged, the type who is obviously well drilled and proficient in the use of firearms, but you wouldn't necessarily want them to have access to firearms.

  • @jbeebs1
    @jbeebs1 3 роки тому +3

    Why do judges, along with politicians, continue to work well beyond their cognitive years?🧐

  • @JamieZero7
    @JamieZero7 3 роки тому +3

    What a load of BS "using protests for their own gain" They all did that. There was no group for their own gain if the same reaction happened across the country with the same events.

  • @pellythirteen5654
    @pellythirteen5654 3 роки тому +4

    The judge tries to be funny and glib and often has a smile on his face.
    So there's a bunch of guys coming from all over the country feeling the urge to "help out" local law enforcement.
    They carry heavy assult weapons , a can of mace and a first aid kit. On arrival in Kenosha they get "assigned" to a district and are ordered to protect properties.
    They have "friendly chats" with the unarmed protesters. They have their guns hanging over their chest , barrel down , showing their friendly nature. And if things heat up , they politely Shout-Shove-Show and Shoot ... and shoot they do!
    It must be very frightening to live in America.

    • @kemfranklin4093
      @kemfranklin4093 3 роки тому +1

      That sad part about what you just so eloquently laid out is so many don't see it that way. There are a bunch of sick f*cks in this country! How can you not see the wrong in what happened here? Additionally, the arrogance that these people display is amazing. They really believe they had the "right" to do what they did and they DON'T! I despise ignorance, arrogance, and hate!

    • @pellythirteen5654
      @pellythirteen5654 3 роки тому +1

      This week (11/10) Kyle will take the stand. Go have a look at it and tell me what you see. He thinks he is the law.

    • @rebeccatrishel
      @rebeccatrishel 3 роки тому

      The riots in 2020 were really, really bad.
      I never saw one in my town personally, but if I had I'd rather be hanging out with the marine than anywhere else.

  • @newrepublican7718
    @newrepublican7718 3 роки тому +4

    Does anyone else find it mind boggling that the judge won't allow Huber, Rosenbaum, or Grosskreutz to be referred to as "victims", and won't allow any of the militia members to be called "proud boys", or "Boogaloo Bois" even though a majority of them openly admit to their affiliation, but will allow protesters to be referred to as rioters ?

    • @JohnnieWalkerDread
      @JohnnieWalkerDread 3 роки тому +9

      There is no inconsistency. Because Kyle is the accused, he is provided special protections against characterizations that imply his guilt. Witnesses are not afforded such protections because they're not on trial.

    • @andrewj9831
      @andrewj9831 3 роки тому +3

      For them to be "victims" they can't be the assailant.... This is what this case is about...maybe Kyle was the victim...and that's how it going right now.

    • @JohnnieWalkerDread
      @JohnnieWalkerDread 3 роки тому +3

      @@andrewj9831 Agreed 100%. Calling Gaige et al. victims essentially labels Kyle as guilty. Not sure why Judge Schroeder's rule isn't the law in every state and every court proceeding. It makes perfect sense.

    • @venuss2000
      @venuss2000 3 роки тому +1

      Kyle is the victim and isn't part of any militia.

    • @venuss2000
      @venuss2000 3 роки тому +3

      @@JohnnieWalkerDread completely agree. If someone breaks into my home and I kill them to protect my life, the burglar shouldn't be able to be called "victim." That should be a rule across the board.

  • @kemfranklin4093
    @kemfranklin4093 3 роки тому +1

    For the record, kids don't walk around with AR15s shooting people!!!!

    • @totalstranger9880
      @totalstranger9880 3 роки тому +6

      If i came to you to beat you to death would you shoot me?

  • @kemfranklin4093
    @kemfranklin4093 3 роки тому +3

    For the people saying Kyle is a hero, WHO RAISED AND HURT Y'ALL?

  • @kemfranklin4093
    @kemfranklin4093 3 роки тому +3

    I wish the prosecutors would put on record how ridiculous this judge is. He is looking for all kinds of ways to derail this case. His entire behavior has been unprofessional and unacceptable. He is not worthy of being a judge! Quack

    • @cdrtej
      @cdrtej 3 роки тому +4

      WTF??

    • @reclaimlifechurch
      @reclaimlifechurch 3 роки тому +5

      So enforcing the constitution makes you a quack in today’s society?

    • @joemurray6522
      @joemurray6522 3 роки тому +4

      Wrong

    • @danidavis2357
      @danidavis2357 3 роки тому +5

      He is defending the constirution and upholding the premise of innocent until proven guilty.. you probably go shopping with a few rocks in case you're asked to wear a 😷

  • @rhymereason3449
    @rhymereason3449 3 роки тому +4

    Very damaging testimony for Rittenhouse... it established that once again RIttenhouse lied about being an EMT (In Wisconson you must be 18 to be a certified EMT)... Rittenhouse may have been in training... but he didn't say "EMT Trainee"... he said "EMT". This could damage Rittenhouse's credibility if he goes on the stand. Secondly, it established that another armed man found Rosenbaum to be "not a threat at all" after interacting with him. Third, it established that Rosenbaum would "false step" and back off... which Lackdowski didn't find threatening. Rosenbaum could have been doing this to Rittenhouse and RIttenhouse over-reacted and shot him.

    • @julie198
      @julie198 3 роки тому +8

      EMT/Medic was used liberally at these protests to describe anyone at the protests who were there to help when people were hurt. Regular people would come and play the roles of medics.

    • @googleuser2226
      @googleuser2226 3 роки тому +6

      even if any of that were true, it wouldn't prevent Kyle from being able to legally defend himself. And you have already been told about Lackowski saying if Rosenbaum did to him what he did to Kyle that he would consider it a threat on his life. I even gave you a time stamp on the video to start watching it.

    • @googleuser2226
      @googleuser2226 3 роки тому +9

      You also clearly missed testimony from another witness that Rosenbaum was lunging at Kyle trying to take his firearm.

    • @johnlyn1
      @johnlyn1 3 роки тому +5

      Not at all. Kyle doesn't live in WI. He got his training when he decided to be a lifeguard. You say, once again he lied. What did he lie about before? This witness helped his case and further destroyed the prosecution's case as his other witnesses have done. Had you bothered to listen to all the testimony and pay attention you would know this. You obviously didn't listen to the defense attorney cross examine this witness. Rosenbaum never threatened this witness. Rosenbaum never chased after this witness. Rosenbaum never tried to go for the gun this witness had. But this witness did say if Rosenbaum did the same to him as he did to Kyle he would have treated that a threat against his life. Oops!

    • @julie198
      @julie198 3 роки тому +2

      Maybe he was. The question is really did Kyle feel threatened in the situation at the exact time he chose to shoot.

  • @donaldkjenstad1129
    @donaldkjenstad1129 3 роки тому +2

    Kyle needs to go to jail for along time …

    • @andrewj9831
      @andrewj9831 3 роки тому +8

      For what crime?

    • @joemurray6522
      @joemurray6522 3 роки тому

      @@andrewj9831 being a republican probably

    • @andrewj9831
      @andrewj9831 3 роки тому

      @@joemurray6522 is that your answer? Or trying to deflect it...as you don't have one....

    • @joemurray6522
      @joemurray6522 3 роки тому +4

      @@andrewj9831 I’m on your side you idiot. I’m saying he is being villainized because he is a republican. This entire kangaroo court is obviously political.

    • @andrewj9831
      @andrewj9831 3 роки тому +1

      @@joemurray6522 I stand corrected...I misread your statement.

  • @mktdul2095
    @mktdul2095 3 роки тому

    For the future riots, just get a baseball bat. You can protect property with a bat just as effectively as with a gun in these situations. A guy wanted to kill himself and achieved this. This ritten boy is no more guilty than a train or a pavement if he guy jumped out of the window. He wouldnt do it if kyle had a bat. The other two also would have been alive.