indo european is term used to describe aryan people/white people. there were different branches of this huge group that expanded for 8 millenias towards europe, middle east, north africa, iran and some parts of india. happened that some mixed with others especially in india but that doesnt change the fact that indo europeans were are all aryans.
@@acolyte5236 nope only the indo aryans and Iranians are called aryans not europeans or North Africans, and on a genetic level islamic invasion didn't end aryans in afghanistan pakistan but cultural/religion wise it did.
They called themselves Eerean not Arian, it was later indo-iranians changed E to A:Arian.Even the kings of Bihainili (wrongly named Urartu) had inscriptions where they called them by their named Erian and their so-called land-Eriakhi:land of Erians.And it was situated in the north-west of modern days Iran(land of Erians).They were not white with blond hear , and they had not blue eyes .if they weren't of Caucasian or European , or Finnic origin.The formation and origin of Indo-Europeans in India is complete idiotism.Hindi or Sanskrit is the latest stage of all the indo-european ones..The cradle of these lanngusges is Armenia, Armenian language is the father of them all , but the mother can be every local aboriginal language where that people had stepped down...
Awesome video
Thank you!
All Indo-European tribes were not Aryans. Only the Brahmanical tribes were Aryans.
Thank you for the clarification. I didn't mean to imply that all indo-europeans were Aryans, I appreciate your comment.
indo european is term used to describe aryan people/white people. there were different branches of this huge group that expanded for 8 millenias towards europe, middle east, north africa, iran and some parts of india. happened that some mixed with others especially in india but that doesnt change the fact that indo europeans were are all aryans.
@@acolyte5236 They existed in Afghanistan and Pakistan too. Morseso than much of modern day India
@@نادرالیراحمان they existed ofc you are right. But long time ago. Before the Islamic conquests. Not anymore.
@@acolyte5236 nope only the indo aryans and Iranians are called aryans not europeans or North Africans, and on a genetic level islamic invasion didn't end aryans in afghanistan pakistan but cultural/religion wise it did.
Indoeuropean corded ware👱🏼♂️👩🏼🦰➡️sintashta👱🏼♂️👩🏼🦰➡️andronovo👱🏼♂️👩🏼🦰➡️scyhtian👱🏼♂️👩🏼🦰➡️eastacyhian👱🏼♂️👩🏻(hunic)
LOL, what hapend to Pelasgian, Etruscians and Illyrians? U need to do a bettet reaserch!
They called themselves Eerean not Arian, it was later indo-iranians changed E to A:Arian.Even the kings of Bihainili (wrongly named Urartu) had inscriptions where they called them by their named Erian and their so-called land-Eriakhi:land of Erians.And it was situated in the north-west of modern days Iran(land of Erians).They were not white with blond hear , and they had not blue eyes .if they weren't of Caucasian or European , or Finnic origin.The formation and origin of Indo-Europeans in India is complete idiotism.Hindi or Sanskrit is the latest stage of all the indo-european ones..The cradle of these lanngusges is Armenia, Armenian language is the father of them all , but the mother can be every local aboriginal language where that people had stepped down...
Indo-Europeans are Caucasoids.
Proto-indo-europeans were not/had no farmers.