The Strange Reason There Are TWO Captain Marvels

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 20 лис 2022
  • Back in 2019, there were 2 Captain Marvel movies out in theaters. One from Marvel Studios, one from DC Studios. Though one continued with the name Captain Marvel, the other Shazam! But how exactly did we end up with two Captain Marvel movies from different studios? And why did one change their name to Shazam?
    #marvel #shazam #nerdstalgic
    Written by Dave Baker
    Edited by Nick Murphy
  • Розваги

КОМЕНТАРІ • 770

  • @OhNoBohNo
    @OhNoBohNo Рік тому +269

    I think it's pretty fine for Billy to get to have a cool yet silly name of 'Shazam', with the biggest issue for me being that, there's no way this kid wouldn't accidentally say his own codename all the time and transform and break his secret identity.

    • @Baalek1
      @Baalek1 Рік тому +31

      Ironically, that has actually been a problem for Captain Marvel Jr. going back to the 40s. Because while the wizard Shazam gave Billy Batson his powers (and thus saying his name transforms Billy into Captain Marvel/Shazam), it's Captain Marvel who gave powers to the rest of the Marvel family, meaning that they say HIS name to transform. Which means Captain Marvel Jr. could never say his own name without transforming back!

    • @druunderwood5602
      @druunderwood5602 Рік тому

      I'll take a guess, "Kimota" overrides all command words, Merlin word?

    • @druunderwood5602
      @druunderwood5602 Рік тому

      Your mission, should you choose to accept it, find Captain Marvels command word.

    • @ericcxxxx
      @ericcxxxx Рік тому

      he stay as shazam most of the new movies and that i hate the new movies

    • @redwolfexr
      @redwolfexr Рік тому +2

      Intent filter...

  • @kristofgriffin384
    @kristofgriffin384 Рік тому +624

    Billy Batson will always be the one true Captain Marvel to me.

  • @esketitesketit1658
    @esketitesketit1658 Рік тому +91

    This really angers me how DC did that to Shazam’s creators. They weren’t at all similar. Makes me feel very different about Supes now. Left Shazam on dust for almost 30 years because of competition? All that potential wasted.

    • @watnyAbellard
      @watnyAbellard Рік тому +30

      I totally agree with you, it was sad how they put a comic company like that out of business that was earning an honest living

    • @thomaskilroy4573
      @thomaskilroy4573 Рік тому +6

      They had a point though. I mean to be fair Captain Marvel really WAS a rip off of Superman with only just enough changed to hopefully avoid a lawsuit.

    • @esketitesketit1658
      @esketitesketit1658 Рік тому +5

      @@thomaskilroy4573 they weren’t at all similar

    • @thomaskilroy4573
      @thomaskilroy4573 Рік тому +9

      @@esketitesketit1658 Allow me to educate you pal. Superheroes were not common in the late 1930s. In fact there were no superheroes before Superman came along. Superheroes just didn’t exist. It’s not like nowadays. When Superman debuted in 1938, he was wildly popular because no one had ever seen something like that before. Fawcett Publishing LITERALLY told Bob Parker and C.C. Beck to come up with a “Superman” for them to publish. He had to have identical great strength, resistance to harm, great speed, heroic stature, he had to wear bright colours, he had to have a cape, he had to have a news reporter alter ego. In the lawsuit DC released a 150 page binder of Superman doing things which Captain Marvel was then shown to be doing identically 2 years later without any difference in even the most basic of outlines and shading as if Fawcett had just traced over it. Testimony’s from several employees and artists working for Fawcett made clear that they had been told outright to copy Superman. The Trial Judge LITERALLY found that Captain Marvel was an illegal copy of Superman. The only reason Fawcett won was because of complications with Superman’s own copyright status. So yes…Captain Marvel was absolutely, unarguably, and 100% a Superman ripoff. The fucking creators said so themselves. So better luck next time buddy.

    • @esketitesketit1658
      @esketitesketit1658 Рік тому +4

      @@thomaskilroy4573 I’m not reading that. They’re backgrounds are completely different. Inspired vs copying is two different things. Was it a knock off when supergirl and co. Came after the Shazam family was shelved?

  • @kledgalario9098
    @kledgalario9098 Рік тому +33

    Billy captures the hearts of all kids , and teaches of what it means to be a hero

  • @jeremy1860
    @jeremy1860 Рік тому +95

    The first time I ever heard the name was back when the DC version made his debut in the episode "Clash" on the Justice League cartoon. I was pretty confused about why I never saw him with it after that, but I suppose I shouldn't have been surprised by it being a legal issue 😅

    • @LPenn0505
      @LPenn0505 5 місяців тому

      That’s crazy that you mention that episode. I looked up why there are two Captain Marvels because of that episode.

  • @benwasserman8223
    @benwasserman8223 Рік тому +193

    What’s funny about Carol Danvers’ journey to the Captain Marvel title is how she’s the fifth person to get it after Mar-Vel. Yet as Ms. Marvel she was undeniably more popular than OG Captain Marvel and most of his successors- much of which can be attributed to the lightning bolt one-piece.

    • @tintillor
      @tintillor Рік тому +12

      And yet, in the cultural zeitgeist she was nothing more than Rogue's root for her powers.

    • @benwasserman8223
      @benwasserman8223 Рік тому +6

      @@tintillor No she's the root of powers for her 90s incarnation. Something that would have been as much as passing fad as Superior Spider-Man had the 90s cartoon not done well. Also EMH Ms. Marvel kicked ass.

    • @ryice944
      @ryice944 Рік тому +2

      @@tintillor you do know those powers faded and rogue was used to retcon a shitty story plus get her away from avengers cause the writter didn't trust the avenger writter anymore with her after what he did

    • @gonhunter3994
      @gonhunter3994 Рік тому +5

      @@benwasserman8223 By "og" do u mean Mar-Vell? Or the REAL Captain Marvel (Billy Batson)?

    • @benwasserman8223
      @benwasserman8223 Рік тому +4

      @@gonhunter3994 Mar-Vel if we’re talking the Marvel universe. She basically received the fame equivalent of Jamie Sommers in Bionic Woman overtaking Six Million Dollar Man.

  • @What.99
    @What.99 Рік тому +43

    I just find it odd that the secret word that Billy Batson says to turn into Shazam is now his name too. Like, he would DEFINITELY be saying that word and accidentally transforming himself a lot. “Hey cool, Shazam is in the newspapers again,” and a crack of lightning slams down lol. So much for that secret identity.

    • @RikkuTakanashi
      @RikkuTakanashi Рік тому +2

      I feel like it's not just saying the word, but saying it with intent. Even the first time when Billy was yelled at and forced to say it's name, he did so with confused intent. Mentioning it casually in a sentence with no intent or desire to transform probably wouldn't change him. That theory can open the door for interesting subconscious shenanigans, too.

    • @What.99
      @What.99 Рік тому +4

      @@RikkuTakanashi If that was the case, then that first time he said the word wouldn’t have done anything cuz, like you said, he was confused, and had no intent beyond saying the word. He had no idea what saying the word would do, so he only said the word because the Wizard was yelling at him to.

    • @thomaskilroy4573
      @thomaskilroy4573 Рік тому +4

      @@RikkuTakanashi Nah, there have been MANY times where people have had to stop Black Adam and have done so by tricking him into saying the word Shazam. Even if it’s without intent, just saying the word is enough.

    • @What.99
      @What.99 Рік тому

      @@thomaskilroy4573 I just rewatched Black Adam, and the Justice Society’s first plan to stop Black Adam was literally to get him to say Shazam lol. Not sure how they knew his “password” from 5,000 years ago, but there’s so many other issues with the movie that I’m not even gonna nitpick it.
      But yeah, the movie solidifies my comment about Shazam accidentally saying the word and giving away his secret identity lol.

    • @goodmaro
      @goodmaro 2 місяці тому +1

      @@RikkuTakanashi No, the old media clearly established that intent was not required! Not only that, but rather than "Shazam!" toggling in both directions, he had to say "Captain Marvel" to change back. Accidental changes were always a hilarious part of the plot.

  • @thatoneguy1232
    @thatoneguy1232 Рік тому +132

    I was actually first introduced to the character when I got Mortal Kombat vs. DC Universe. I understood the character pretty well but I found it funny how a DC character was named Captain Marvel not knowing the history. A few years later playing Injustice I was confused as to why he was now Shazam. Knowing what I knew, which was little, that was odd that Captain Marvel is now Shazam which is also the wizard and also the phrase he uses to morph to and from his hero form. On the Marvel side, I actually was introduced to that character through the MCU lol. Like many, not a huge fan of that character. Kinda boring to me.

    • @mickeymouse7726
      @mickeymouse7726 Рік тому +8

      My first introduction to Carol Danvers was in the show avengers Earth's mightiest hero's and she was great there

    • @ericwarr9088
      @ericwarr9088 Рік тому +5

      I could have sworn that he was refered to as "captain marvel" in the first injustice game when it first came out... They must have updated it later...

    • @mouthymicah84
      @mouthymicah84 Рік тому +5

      I know it is an unpopular opinion, but MK vs DC..... Absolutely great game.

    • @thatoneguy1232
      @thatoneguy1232 Рік тому +1

      @@mouthymicah84 I agree. It’s a fun game. I had a great time playing it and it introduced me to how people can be online 😆. I guess it also helps that I don’t take it seriously as a mainline MK game. Just a silly goofy crossover where Batman takes a sleeping undead ninja for a joyride. Also the finishers weren’t that bad outside of Kano’s. Some were so popular that they were recreated like Joker’s. Also that game saved the franchise. As 4th snake put it, that crossover put MK on WB’s radar which directly lead to the formation of NRS(better or worse lol) giving us 3 Mortal kombats and two Injustice games as well as comics and mobile games based on them.

    • @mouthymicah84
      @mouthymicah84 Рік тому +1

      @@thatoneguy1232 Oh yeah, infinite Superman ground pound... Blood still boils from that... 😂 I def took it too serious. Lol. Great times though.

  • @weldsj8847
    @weldsj8847 Рік тому +32

    Heck, add in a piece about "Miracle Man" formally "Marvel Man" for extra confusion.

    • @Noms_Chompsky
      @Noms_Chompsky Рік тому +1

      There was also an independent who did a Ms. Marvel about 10 years before Carol Danvers too, lolz.

    • @weldsj8847
      @weldsj8847 Рік тому

      @@Noms_Chompsky I'd not heard that! Carol Danvers was Ms. Marvel in the 1970s only to become Captain Marvel after black woman Maria Rambeau got there first.

    • @Noms_Chompsky
      @Noms_Chompsky Рік тому +1

      @@weldsj8847 I picked up a reprint book of the run at the library sometime in the early '90's. or late '80's maybe. It was one of those head comix though so it's not surprising that it's as obscure as it is. It didn't have a very long run, maybe 12 issues all told give or take and they weren't all that great if I recall but I do remember the forward making a big deal congratulating themselves on getting there first with the character name although rather than the Ms. Marvel '70's feminist, this Ms. Marvel was a bit of a Dominatrix looking and acting more like the old '50's Catwoman.

  • @hazeldejesus
    @hazeldejesus Рік тому +44

    In the flashpoint movie, he goes by Captain Marvel. Wonder woman has to compel him to tell her how to change him back. It really doesn’t make sense for his name to be Shazam.

    • @garyhall2770
      @garyhall2770 Рік тому +5

      He goes by Captain Thunder in that movie.

    • @flashknight7720
      @flashknight7720 Рік тому +2

      This is something I hadn’t really thought about. Pretty hard to introduce yourself or ever talk about yourself in the third person when your name triggers a transformation.
      Mid-battle: Hey what’s your name?
      Shazam: Ughhhh, can’t say it right now!

    • @jb888888888
      @jb888888888 Рік тому

      ​@@flashknight7720 Captain Marvel Jr. literally can't say his own superhero name, because his transformation word is "Captain Marvel!"

  • @46sn29
    @46sn29 Рік тому +98

    At least Billy Batson is the original Captain Marvel in his universe. Carol isn't even the original version in her universe. She's like the 6th person to hold that title.

    • @dutchgamer842
      @dutchgamer842 Рік тому +5

      In the comics she isn't. In the MCU she is, since MCU only is loosely based on Marvel Comics and doesn't follow the literal comic book storyline.

  • @Sergeantgrunt
    @Sergeantgrunt Рік тому +46

    SHAZAM is not the name of the wizard. SHAZAM is the first letter for each of the six wizards.

    • @diy_mushroomguy
      @diy_mushroomguy Рік тому +4

      Weird how they're ancient but their name's end up in English.

    • @blechb5317
      @blechb5317 Рік тому +3

      His name used to be Shazam. He only got an actual name as of the New 52 reboot 12 years ago.

  • @allenkaineroyukitoha
    @allenkaineroyukitoha Рік тому +6

    I agreed with almost everything you said except with your last phrase. In my opinion it should have been " We have a Captain Marvel movie, and a Great Captain Marvel movie"

    • @Syndur
      @Syndur 2 місяці тому

      Yeah, but that could lead to questions of which is which. Like, Captain Marvel is one of my favorite MCU movies, while Shazam is kind of ok. But, as always, there are probably people that would see if differently.

    • @allenkaineroyukitoha
      @allenkaineroyukitoha 2 місяці тому

      @@Syndur let the facts do the talking. One is a ridiculed hero turn into comedy to appeal the audience. The other is a so called " coming of age" story of a loved character that was a joke for the audience. You may like the character, it's a fair opinion. Unfortunately you could be so much better reading her comic instead. Carol is way better in aspect in the comics. At Least until her obvious political change. Moved by an ideology that wrongs al her rights.

  • @bigpurplepops
    @bigpurplepops Рік тому +20

    ‘Captain Marvel’ is a name from the 40’s whereas it was primarily ‘Timely Comics’ which later adopted their own ‘Marvel Comics Group’ sub-branding as their main name in the 60s

  • @albertguansing2218
    @albertguansing2218 Рік тому +13

    Black Adam: "what's your name kid?"
    Capt Marvel: "Shazam!"
    Black Adam: "Wait What?"

  • @adamnapolitano432
    @adamnapolitano432 Рік тому +15

    Just to be clear at 6:20, it's Ms Marvel that was wildly popular, they wouldn't have had to relaunch Carol Danvers Captain Marvel's books over and over and over and over again with new Number 1 issues if she retained her popularity, she'd not popular, which is why the comics keep pulling the Issue 1 Speculator Card every time her sales numbers go off a cliff.

    • @Lang7
      @Lang7 Рік тому

      Was about to comment the same thing. Carol Danvers Captain Marvel books have less staying power than warm milk.

    • @burnsbabe87
      @burnsbabe87 Рік тому +2

      But Marvel is doing that with all their characters. It’s not a Carol thing.

    • @Carabas72
      @Carabas72 Рік тому +4

      Relaunching books over and over again is what Marvel does. They do it with The Avengers book, with Iron Man, with Thor, with the X-Men, with the various Spider-Man books...
      And then every so often they get an extra sales boost by going back to the original numbering. It's what they do with everything.

  • @SpammytheHedgehog
    @SpammytheHedgehog Рік тому +39

    They should've just called Carol Danvers, Ms. Marvel

    • @Unreatxplaya
      @Unreatxplaya Рік тому +5

      They used to but now that’s Kamala.

    • @SchmergDergen
      @SchmergDergen Рік тому +2

      @@Unreatxplaya still, few people like Manvers.

    • @Cazz8203
      @Cazz8203 Рік тому +1

      Disney would never call their big feminist beacon Ms marvel.

    • @Carabas72
      @Carabas72 Рік тому +1

      Why? Carol has been Captain Marvel longer than Mar-vell at this point.

    • @SchmergDergen
      @SchmergDergen Рік тому +1

      @@Carabas72 and she was infinitely more enjoyable as Ms.Marvel.

  • @jonasquinn7977
    @jonasquinn7977 Рік тому +14

    I don’t think Shazam will ever be changed back at this point, the MCU has basically guaranteed that the average person will associate the name Captain Marvel with Carol Danvers for years if not decades to come and unless Marvel somehow lets the copyright for the title slip it would just be a repeat of the earlier confusion to call the comics Shazam and the character Captain Marvel

    • @Carabas72
      @Carabas72 Рік тому +6

      It's not just that. It's trademarks. Marvel owns that and is basically never losing that (and that is 100% DC's fault for sueing Fawcett back in the day), and DC was just plain tired of having to be coy with the name of one of their main heroes and having to name their Captain Marvel books something like "Power Of SHAZAM" instead of just "Captain Marvel"..

    • @Splax77
      @Splax77 Рік тому +6

      Marvel owns the trademark for Captain Marvel, so DC is literally not allowed to use that name on any covers, titles, or promotional material. BUT, they still own their character Captain Marvel and are still allowed to use him. It's a very confusing situation.

    • @rhettgedies7467
      @rhettgedies7467 Рік тому +5

      I preferred Danvers as Ms. Marvel. So the title of Captain Marvel has always been associated with DC's character for me.

    • @-leaford1584
      @-leaford1584 Рік тому +1

      Yes, thank you for getting the distinction right!

    • @-leaford1584
      @-leaford1584 Рік тому +4

      And the merchandizing. Personally, I think that's the major factor. DC was fine using Shazam for covers but Captain Marvel in the stories, until movie merchandizing was at stake.

  • @patgarner
    @patgarner Рік тому +71

    Having grown up in the 70's watching the live action show with a character named Captain Marvel who said SHAZAM! to change into his superhero form, this sometimes bothers me to no end.

    • @kiltonmills
      @kiltonmills Рік тому +1

      DC Comics Cancels Shazam: The Monster Society Of Evil Hardcover Over Racist Concerns Posted on August 1, 2018 by Rich Johnston|Comments The left hand of DC Comics was publishing the Captain Marvel series The Monster Society Of Evil in a Shazam deluxe hardcover form. A historically important shift for superhero comics into longform storytelling, running serialised from 1943 to 1945, one of the first stories to do so, it does also contain a number of negative racial stereotypes towards black people…

    • @courtneydipersico143
      @courtneydipersico143 Рік тому +1

      Of the 2 movies, I prefer Shazam’s take way more. Overall better character and story

    • @patgarner
      @patgarner Рік тому

      @@courtneydipersico143 I definitely agree regarding recent big screen adaptations. I lke the recent animated takes on Shazam more than the latest movie, but I still like it.

    • @SpaceWizardCosplay
      @SpaceWizardCosplay Рік тому

      @@courtneydipersico143 I agree and I am patiently awaiting the sequel coming out soon!

  • @bmvthemoviefanatic7282
    @bmvthemoviefanatic7282 Рік тому +10

    It's really trippy that Billy's superhero name is Shazam now, cause if someone asks his name if he says it, he reverts back to a kid 😄 Makes it a bit trickier to self-promote it seems... (Unless the comics have addressed this)

  • @SpammytheHedgehog
    @SpammytheHedgehog Рік тому +515

    In Cinema, Shazam is a better protagonist than Captain Marvel.

  • @borg386
    @borg386 Рік тому +15

    Carol Danvers Captain Marvel tearing it up on the big screen? That was so funny 😁😂

    • @geraldeh7291
      @geraldeh7291 Рік тому +4

      Yes, she tore up any hope of a good movie.

    • @Ryotsu2112
      @Ryotsu2112 Рік тому +1

      Killed at the box office, in spite of angry nerd incels.

    • @borg386
      @borg386 Рік тому

      @Ryotsu2112 Wow! You are right! I didn't know it did so well. Respect!

  • @Zurround
    @Zurround Рік тому +25

    There are also two ULTRAMEN. Ultraman is a giant Japanese super hero who protects the world from scary giant monsters but in the Superman cartoons there is also an alternate universe counterpart to Superman named ULTRA MAN. He is NOT 200 feet tall, he is maybe 6 feet tall and rivals Superman in strength, indestructibility and other powers.

    • @michaelbrannon8452
      @michaelbrannon8452 Рік тому +2

      Don't forget the other Ultra Man who looks like if Fabio had played Superman.

  • @AkilaeAK
    @AkilaeAK Рік тому +23

    Rogue will always be the unofficial Captain Marvel to me. 😍😍

    • @AdamRelayson
      @AdamRelayson Рік тому +4

      I get that you’re trying to show off your knowledge, but that makes no sense. If that were the case, Rogue would be the unofficial version of every character she ever touched.

    • @AkilaeAK
      @AkilaeAK Рік тому +3

      @@AdamRelayson Knowledge? More like nostalgia. I grew up watching the 90's Xmen but I missed that episode explaining Rogue's flight/strength so I actually had no idea who Captain Marvel was. After learning that plotline when I was a little older - I always just kind of refused to accept that Rogue wasn't just that bad ass on her own.. 😆 Hence, the 'hate' (not really) on Captain Marvel.
      Btw, wasn't Rogue's power stealing abilities usually just temporary? I don't remember why she kept Marvel's for so long?

    • @Carabas72
      @Carabas72 Рік тому +4

      @@AkilaeAK
      It's because X-Men writer Chris Claremont 1) really wanted Rogue to have some non-creepy powers and 2) was a big fan of the Carol Danvers character and used this to bring her to greater prominence and give her a massive power-upgrade.

  • @jahimuddin2306
    @jahimuddin2306 Рік тому +69

    I recently got back into superhero content and before I watched Shazam I tried to read the history of the character. All that happened was I got confused that both companies had a Captain Marvel.

    • @peteramaranth85
      @peteramaranth85 Рік тому +4

      It's not that hard, marvel wasnt happy dc had a charixter with there name in it, so when they failed to pay to keep the rights to the name marvel jumped at the change and made captain marvel screwing dc over at the same time.

    • @michaelbrannon8452
      @michaelbrannon8452 Рік тому +4

      Marvel was the second company to have a Captiain Marvel , not the first.

    • @jahimuddin2306
      @jahimuddin2306 Рік тому

      @@michaelbrannon8452, I did not say that they were the first.

    • @geraldstephens6612
      @geraldstephens6612 Рік тому

      @@peteramaranth85 That's what happens when your previous legal team didn't secure the trademark protection of a character's name.

    • @IJLook
      @IJLook Рік тому

      @@michaelbrannon8452 Actually Marvel was the third company. Another company had Carl Burgos create a android that could split up his body to send his fists to punch bad guys called Captain Marvel .Martin Goodman didn't like another company having a character with marvel in his name so he sued them to stop the character, then had Stan Lee create Mar-cell Marvel's first Captain Marvel.

  • @laurelsilberman5705
    @laurelsilberman5705 Рік тому +6

    “Say my name.”
    “BILLY!”
    “No! Not that name, the name I say to turn into this guy!”

  • @rhyanlumilay6317
    @rhyanlumilay6317 Рік тому +19

    How I wish that there was a series where the two met and where Shazam will break the fourth wall and mention about them being both the Capt. Marvel :-D

    • @garyhall2770
      @garyhall2770 Рік тому +5

      Kurt Busiek and George Perez were able to do a JLA vs the Avengers 4 issue comic book and for one panel Shazam and CPT. Mar-vell are in it.

  • @inanimatesum4945
    @inanimatesum4945 Рік тому +8

    The hero that did so well he had to be bought out.

  • @Noms_Chompsky
    @Noms_Chompsky Рік тому +16

    Captain Marvel is the hero who changes from a teenage kid to a super powered hero with a big clang of the nega bands.

    • @Carabas72
      @Carabas72 Рік тому

      Well, that is merely one of the many options.

    • @Noms_Chompsky
      @Noms_Chompsky Рік тому

      @@Carabas72 Well, of course, but the funny comes from how closely Mar'Vell resembles the original Marvel y'know. Kimota!

    • @slygeebee7575
      @slygeebee7575 Рік тому +1

      First time I've seen anyone mention Rick Jones being the alter ego to Marvel's Captain Marvel. Ms Marvel was a better fit for Carol Danvers. How will a proper Rogue fit in the MCU I wonder.

    • @Carabas72
      @Carabas72 Рік тому +1

      @@slygeebee7575
      That's not something anybody has to worry about for at least another 5 years.
      But "proper Rogue" is not a flying brick. That's merely 90s Rogue.

    • @slygeebee7575
      @slygeebee7575 Рік тому

      @@Carabas72 didn't get the 'flying brick' in the movies thus far. Not collected comics for a minute so, from your response, I guess there's been a significant amount of recounting- much like Danvers being a Captain.

  • @Augustus087
    @Augustus087 Рік тому +5

    There is only ONE Captain Marvel, and his name is Billy Batson. The alternative I have renamed "Captain Man-Hater."

  • @SheilaTheGrate
    @SheilaTheGrate Рік тому +5

    Anecdotal evidence time! As a teenager in the 90s, I wasn't into superhero comics, but I was into D&D, so I was at the comic book store a lot. I always thought that particular hero was actually called "Shazam". When I saw the trailers, I thought, "Oh, they made a movie about that red and yellow suit comic book guy!"

  • @brennanscarcello1443
    @brennanscarcello1443 Рік тому +4

    And both moves have Djimon Honsou in the cast.

  • @SpammytheHedgehog
    @SpammytheHedgehog Рік тому +15

    DC and Marvel went to war for the title of Captain Marvel.

    • @Carabas72
      @Carabas72 Рік тому +1

      Not really.
      DC and Fawcett went to war over Captain Marvel. Marvel ending up with the trademark is merely fallout of DC's greed. And there was no point in DC going to war with Marvel over it because DC didn't have a legal leg to stand on.

    • @ryice944
      @ryice944 Рік тому

      Not at all
      Dc ran a company into the dirt to get rid of him because he out sold there flag ship character superman
      The company then sold him to dc where dc just killed all his popularity by letting him go to waste in limbo and never bothered about the trade mark
      And marvel after changing its name and seeing that the name was available took the name captain marvel trade marked it and made there own character and dc could do nothing about it cause it was there fault and had to stop using the name on covers

  • @apmcd47
    @apmcd47 Рік тому +3

    I remember reading somewhere that Zachary Levi stated that his Chuck co-star,Yvonne Strahovski, was at one point in the running to play Carol Danvers. That would have taken the rivalry of the two characters to another level.

    • @bdonovable
      @bdonovable Рік тому

      That would have been great!

  • @Dats_Mark
    @Dats_Mark Рік тому +5

    Sort of a Frankenstein/Frankenstein's Monster situation with the Shazam/Captain Marvel name confusion

    • @benwasserman8223
      @benwasserman8223 Рік тому +2

      More like a series of legal battles, followed by a legal loophole that locked Marvel into creating Mar-Vel stories Or they’d lose the title copyright.

  • @johnmcafee6140
    @johnmcafee6140 Рік тому +15

    Shazam will always be the real Captain Marvel in my heart.

  • @heyfell4301
    @heyfell4301 Рік тому +4

    They could just have kept Carol as Ms.Marvel and Billy as Captain Marvel. At least then he wouldn't have to deal with the stupidity of not being able to say his own name without de-transforming.

  • @hirotrum6810
    @hirotrum6810 Рік тому +2

    Damn DC really just said "your superhero has a similar hairstyle to mine so he belongs to me now"

  • @mr.mothgurgle
    @mr.mothgurgle Рік тому +4

    And right when discussing legal issues they show a scene calling him Thunder Crack which is very close to Thundercracker from Transformers lol.

    • @fduranthesee
      @fduranthesee Рік тому

      true, but Thundercracker is irrelevant. no-one really cares about him that much. it's the same with Sunstreaker and Trailbreaker. They get outshined. Starscream outshines every other Seeker. Sideswipe outshines his brother.

  • @RED24659
    @RED24659 Рік тому +3

    Knowing all this makes the shazam post credits scene hit different.

  • @riopato2009
    @riopato2009 10 місяців тому +1

    For the longest time, Shazam was always referred to as Billy Batson in the comics back in the 90's. He didn't have a code name since he had the perfect secret identity. No one knew he was just a kid and Shazam would show up as fast as he would disappear. The best use of the character was in Kingdom Come. He didn't have to talk, and had very little dialog. No one knew that Shazam wasn't a threat because he was just a regular man grown up as an adult that looked like Shazam. No one dared to confront Billy because he's the only human that can physically be Superman's equal and since Superman is vulnerable to true magic, didn't even cross his mind to provoke Billy.

  • @darktenor4967
    @darktenor4967 Рік тому +4

    I'm no expert on superheroes, but when I first heard of captain Marvel (the one in x men ), I assumed there must also be a captain DC out there somewhere.

  • @JamesDOConnor1916
    @JamesDOConnor1916 Рік тому

    Great video sir thanks for another fantastic informative piece 👍 👏 😀

  • @MaxIronsThird
    @MaxIronsThird Рік тому +5

    Did we really have 2 great Captain Marvel movies in 2019? i only remember one, it was called Shazam!

    • @Carabas72
      @Carabas72 Рік тому +1

      The second one was called Shazam...

    • @brandonherrera743
      @brandonherrera743 Рік тому

      @@Carabas72 Based on the character, Captain Marvel. A Captain Marvel Movie. Just Like Man of Steel was a Superman movie

  • @TheRealDustinNunn
    @TheRealDustinNunn Рік тому +2

    Fun facts: Captain Marvel/Billy Batson was the very first character to say "Shazam!" as a catchphrase.

  • @dananichols349
    @dananichols349 Рік тому +2

    I always hoped in "Captain Marvel" when Nick Fury saw Carol for the first time he'd look up in awe and say "shazam!!" and Carol would do the superhero landing in front of him. An unfortunate loss of opportunity.

  • @begottenbaker
    @begottenbaker Рік тому +4

    Only one of those Captain Marvel movies is great though ⚡

  • @chrismulwee4911
    @chrismulwee4911 Рік тому +16

    No matter what, Billy Batson is the TRUE Captain Marvel!

    • @rafaelc.c.
      @rafaelc.c. Рік тому +4

      He is. To be honest in my country people only started to use Shazam instead in 2019 after the film. There were two Captain Marvels and there was no problem. But of course, had we to pick one, Baton is the ONE.

    • @michaelbrannon8452
      @michaelbrannon8452 Рік тому

      Nope.

  • @jayvbspdx
    @jayvbspdx Рік тому +4

    This is a well known story to comic fans and true believers, and I love that Nerdstalgic is finally covering it. I do wish Shazam! got to keep his original name, but I've resigned myself to calling him Shazam! now. Ultimately his publishers have settled on that being what he is called, so I shall too. At least we have our Secrets of Isis shows and actual Captain Marvel serials to remember his origins.

  • @briaryos1
    @briaryos1 Рік тому +1

    When Captain Marvel came out, I had this question. Thanks for doing this.

  • @CamilaCastilhosM
    @CamilaCastilhosM Рік тому +25

    a Captain Maverl being from DC and not MARVEL is weird though

    • @gonhunter3994
      @gonhunter3994 Рік тому +2

      No

    • @dyent
      @dyent Рік тому +4

      Before 1961, Marvel Comics was called Timely Comics, so when Captain Marvel/Shazam was created they weren't using the name .

    • @G59METH
      @G59METH Рік тому +3

      You know the word "marvel" existed before Marvel right ???

    • @leechrec
      @leechrec Рік тому

      Not weird at all, cus the one from DC is the OG.

  • @michaelbrannon8452
    @michaelbrannon8452 Рік тому +4

    What about the Shazam who was in a red suit & his sidekick Captain Marvel in a matching blue suit but still was a kid ? It was a Shazam TV cartoon.

  • @JollibeenosHasYourCoordinates
    @JollibeenosHasYourCoordinates Рік тому +8

    To be honest, DC having a "Captain Marvel" would be weird.

    • @michaelbrannon8452
      @michaelbrannon8452 Рік тому +2

      D.C. had a Capitan Marvel before Marvel did ! Its in the article .

    • @Carabas72
      @Carabas72 Рік тому +2

      @@michaelbrannon8452
      They did not, actually.
      Fawcett Comics had a Captain Marvel before Marvel existed, back in 1940. DC sued them because they felt Fawcett were ripping and won. So nobody had a Superman for decades.
      Then in 1967, Marvel created their (first) Captain Marvel and aquired the trademark. Nobody had any issues with that at the time.
      Fastforward to the early 70s, when DC aquires some old IPs from Fawcett, including the Shazam version of Captain Marvel.
      DC tries to launch a book called "The Original Captain Marvel" in 1972, and is rightly forced to rename it into "Power of Shazam" after Marvel calls in their lawyers over trademark infringement.
      DC is allowed to have a character called "Captain Marvel" (as long as it is very distinct from Marvel's versions) but they can't have a book or movie called "Captain Marvel" because of trademark.

    • @druunderwood5602
      @druunderwood5602 Рік тому

      I'll take a guess, "Kimota" overrides all command words, Merlin word?

    • @druunderwood5602
      @druunderwood5602 Рік тому

      Your mission, should you choose to accept it, find Captain Marvels command word.

  • @adampoole948
    @adampoole948 Рік тому +15

    I've known about this info for a long time and to me DC/Fawcett's Billy Batson will always be Captain Marvel while Carol Danvers will be Ms. Marvel, regardless of what the official stance is

  • @millionelectricvolts6117
    @millionelectricvolts6117 Рік тому +4

    Clearly, the real Captain Marvel was the one who says Shazam.

    • @Carabas72
      @Carabas72 Рік тому

      Clearly they both are fictional characters with equal levels of 'realness' or lack thereof.

  • @legionx791
    @legionx791 Рік тому +2

    When I was a kid I watched a cartoon with 2 people saying Shazam and one person said Captain Marvel to transform. Shazams were in red CM was in blue

    • @michaelbrannon8452
      @michaelbrannon8452 Рік тому

      I remember that ! CM still looked like a teen & Shazam ( Billy Batson) looked like an adult when he transformed.

  • @AnthonyJstark-vz4so
    @AnthonyJstark-vz4so Рік тому +4

    The reason why Shazam was outselling superman in the 40's and 50's was cause kirby and simon were working on it😉💪🏼

  • @Splax77
    @Splax77 Рік тому +14

    You forgot to mention that Marvel owns the trademark for Captain Marvel, so DC is literally not allowed to use that name on any covers, titles, or promotional material. DC was sent a cease & desist by Marvel in 1972 after they started using "The original Captain Marvel" on their covers. BUT, they still own their character Captain Marvel and are still allowed to use him. It's a very confusing situation.

    • @000AnnA000D
      @000AnnA000D Рік тому

      they mentioned that

    • @michaelbrannon8452
      @michaelbrannon8452 Рік тому

      Yes NOW. Yet the first Capitan Marvel wasn't a Marvel creation .

    • @-leaford1584
      @-leaford1584 Рік тому

      Thank you for getting the distinction right.

  • @mrdrprof8402
    @mrdrprof8402 Рік тому +3

    OK... But what if Shazam wants to tell somebody what is name is?
    "I am Shazam"
    *zaps back into Billy*

    • @Carabas72
      @Carabas72 Рік тому

      They got rid of that a long, long time ago in the comics.

  • @geraldjuvejr.6171
    @geraldjuvejr.6171 Рік тому +5

    DC caved....it's that simple. They could have simply just started calling him 'the Captain' as a form of prestige above all the other 'Captains' in the DC (or any other) universe. Like in a conversation between super heroes. "Which Captain? Atom, Comet, Cold...Boomerang? NO! THE CAPTAIN! Oh....why didn't you just say that to begin with?

    • @goodmaro
      @goodmaro 2 місяці тому

      Like "the doctor".

  • @imaginefun13
    @imaginefun13 Рік тому +3

    Well at least there is no debate here: Shazam was a much more enjoyable movie than Captain Marvel

  • @jimbob1800
    @jimbob1800 Рік тому +2

    I remember watching Shazam in the 70s TV series along with Electra woman and Dyna girl segment in the sea monsters Land of the Lost and so on

  • @taylorgayhart9497
    @taylorgayhart9497 Рік тому +22

    Purely based from an SEO standpoint, it makes sense that DC changed the name of Captain Marvel.

  • @TrevorCopter
    @TrevorCopter Рік тому +1

    Considering how quickly DC has abandoned + rebranded Vertigo into DC Black Label, I wouldn’t be surprised if we got a new printing of something like Kingdom Come with Billy renamed “Shazam!”

  • @inazuma3gou
    @inazuma3gou Рік тому +3

    My favorite is Young Justice Cap Marvel.

    • @Nerdstalgic
      @Nerdstalgic  Рік тому +2

      We really like the JLU episode with Billy Batson, as well. :)

  • @asimwaqar
    @asimwaqar Рік тому +6

    It's kinda stupid... Because Shazam can't introduce himself to anyone... Because if he says Shazam he'll turn back into a kid.. Captain Marvel was so he could introduce himself as a super hero.. now he just avoids introducing him 🙄

  • @edvaira6891
    @edvaira6891 Рік тому +1

    “Summer of 2019”?? The Brie Larson film came out in Mid-March of 2019, and Shazam came out in April!! THAT would be SPRING! Both were already on Home Video by the time Summer came around

  • @CoyotesOwn
    @CoyotesOwn Рік тому +9

    I don;t think it's a strange reason. DC let the trademark lapse, after driving Fawcett Comics into the ground with a Superman lawsuit. Marvel has always been prolific about trademarks (see Marvel establishing She-Hulk to prevent universal from making a new Hulk TV-sereis without them, and creating Spider-Woman to spot anyone trying to do a similar thing with Spider-Man) so they jumped on the opportunity. It makes business sense.

    • @Carabas72
      @Carabas72 Рік тому +2

      Fawcett let the trademark lapse after they couldn't print the comic anymore due to DC's lawsuit. At no point in time has DC ever been near the Captain Marvel trademark.

    • @CoyotesOwn
      @CoyotesOwn Рік тому

      @@Carabas72 Huh, so it happened before DC acquired Fawcett?

    • @Carabas72
      @Carabas72 Рік тому

      @@CoyotesOwn
      DC aquired Fawcett's Captain Marvel in the early 70s. Marvel had already created theirs in 1967.

    • @OhNoBohNo
      @OhNoBohNo Рік тому +2

      i love She-Hulk, ultimately the series about law in the superhero world, stemming from trademarks issues

    • @erichwentz2866
      @erichwentz2866 Рік тому

      I don't think Universal could make a new Hulk TV series. Are you referring to back in the 1980s.

  • @therealjoker2957
    @therealjoker2957 Рік тому +3

    There are actually more than two of them from what I've heard. These are just the most famous ones. Or rather from the most famous companies. I'm aware of at least three and I'm pretty sure there's a fourth.

  • @ShaneJoshua1980
    @ShaneJoshua1980 Рік тому +2

    Shazam will always be Captain Marvel to me. Ever since I read Kingdom Come

    • @erichwentz2866
      @erichwentz2866 Рік тому

      Shazam is why I hate DC Comics, what they did to Fawcett comics was totally wrong.

  • @caezoyd
    @caezoyd Рік тому +6

    I think Marvel being not only the name of the character, but also the name of the publisher rival to DC, it should be a no brainer to change the name to Shazam

  • @goodmaro
    @goodmaro 2 місяці тому

    The "heavy" in one of the Superman radio serials was a Captain Marbeau, a ship captain whose name sounded so close to "marvel" that it took many listenings to distinguish.

  • @z_0968
    @z_0968 Рік тому +1

    So Shazam is the modern equivalent of Frakenstein, their names invoke the picture of their creation, rather then the name of their creators like it was intended.

  • @kenharper320
    @kenharper320 Рік тому +1

    You know maybe it's been because I've been too busy working and thinking about other things but I just now noticed that I seen the thumbnail for this video that there are two Captain marvel that is something to think about

  • @j800r_aswell
    @j800r_aswell Рік тому +1

    Makes sense for Marvel to have it. Kinda feels like their mascot.

  • @brianbowens2991
    @brianbowens2991 Рік тому +2

    If someone asks Shazam his name, and he tells them, will he turn back to Billy?

    • @Carabas72
      @Carabas72 Рік тому

      No. Used to be the case, but then people realised how dumb that was and that the audience isn't mostly 10-year-olds anymore.

  • @Rodytohti
    @Rodytohti Рік тому +1

    I grow up to reruns of that Shazam tv show on Brazilian TV, and reading a comic called Marvel Super Adventures with the Adventures of Mar-Vell... For me, they're both Captain Marvel, as it is Monica Rambeau.

  • @bobbymak6964
    @bobbymak6964 Рік тому +3

    I heard that if Mavel Inc stops having a character named Captain Marvel then DC can use the name. Hence there are three versions of Captain Marvel in Marvel. The Kree Mar-vel, Photon or Spectrum who was formerly Captain Marvel, and Ms Marvel Carol Danvers who is the current Captain Marvel.

    • @jonasquinn7977
      @jonasquinn7977 Рік тому

      I’m pretty sure that’s not how it works, so long as they don’t go a very long period of time without using it they keep the copyright which is just how copyright works

    • @bobbymak6964
      @bobbymak6964 Рік тому +1

      @@jonasquinn7977 you explained more elegantly than I did but essentially that's what happened. I wanted to talk about the Wonder Woman/Wonderman, Powergirl/Powerman controversy.

    • @PeterKnagge
      @PeterKnagge Рік тому

      Technically there are way more than two Captain Marvels...

  • @BusStopProductions.
    @BusStopProductions. Рік тому

    I, tried watching this video three times & each time I feel asleep

  • @Zurround
    @Zurround Рік тому +3

    When I was a small child I got to be captain Marvel for Halloween. He will always be Captain Marvel to me not "Shazam".

  • @RothurThePaladin
    @RothurThePaladin Рік тому +2

    For me Billy will always be Captan marvel

  • @seanfaherty
    @seanfaherty Рік тому

    I loved that Shazzam show when I was kid.

  • @ldm420
    @ldm420 Рік тому

    I have been 5hinking about that for years but never decided to search forit

  • @cesare_1302
    @cesare_1302 Рік тому

    7:07 Sentry, Blue Marvel and the Squadron Supreme on the MCU would be dope

  • @kenrk
    @kenrk Рік тому

    The TRUE Captain Marvel yells "Split!" ;)

  • @gelmibson883
    @gelmibson883 Рік тому +1

    The Message!

  • @steinism8076
    @steinism8076 Рік тому +2

    two great captin marvel movies or just one and a passable movie?

  • @PowWowChikaBowWow6902
    @PowWowChikaBowWow6902 Рік тому +9

    The first time I heard of Shazam was either Batman & Superman: Public Enemies or Justice League: Unlimited. I loved the character and Shazam was the name I heard first before Captain Marvel. It wasn’t until I think Batman: The brave and the bold was when I heard Captain Marvel for the first time and I was shocked. Fast forward years later, I was addicted to watching superhero origins and there was origins for Shazam and I watched it then found out about the weird lawsuit between Marvel and DC; I found it kinda funny why it happened but personally, I think Shazam is a much better name

  • @jclay6680
    @jclay6680 Рік тому

    "His name is Thunder Crack" 🤣🤣🤣

  • @CaptainMarvelCulture
    @CaptainMarvelCulture Рік тому +3

    I love the editing and excitement for the subject this video brings! I like your channel and have subscribed and "liked this video." However, though you get much of the history correct, there are a few important details that need clearing up:
    Whether Captain Marvel was a "blatant ripoff of Superman" is an opinion. Though their powers were similar, their origins and sources of their powers were drastically different, not to mention the fact that Superman's alter ego was basically himself with glasses, Captain Marvel's was a young boy.
    Whether the improper copyright notices on the newspaper strips counted as "abandonment" was a legal opinion, not a fact, and that opinion was reversed on appeal. The bottom line was that there had been copying of Superman stories by Captain Marvel writers and artists, but to determine damages, National would have had to bring forth every example. Since this would have been a lengthy and expensive process, they two sides settled.
    The settlement was $400,000, not "upwards of."
    Fawcett Comics did not "go out of business." It was a division of Fawcett Publications, a very successful and diverse magazine publishing house. Since comics, especially superhero comics were in decline n the early 1950's, and the lawsuit was getting pretty costly, Fawcett made the business-wise decision to shut down the comics division when they settled with National. The rest of the company kept n publishing titles like "Family Circle" and "Mechanix Illustrated" for decades.
    DC did not "buy up" any "Fawcett assets at auction only to sit on them." Fawcett sold most of its non-Marvel Family assets to Charlton, and kept on publishing magazines. DC had no use, purpose, or interest on those properties because they did not conflict with their properties, and there was no reason to spend money on the Marvel Family properties since they had just made money and were secure in the knowledge that they would never be seen again.
    Before Marvel created their CM, publisher Myron Fass used a character "based n a character created by Carl Burgos" as the basis for a new character named Captain Marvel, and alien android with the power to split his body parts. Since the trademark of the name (not copyright, there is no such thing as a copyright of a name) was not being held by anyone, in 1966, MF Enterprises began publishing a new "Captain Marvel" comic book abut this character. It lasted 6 issues into 1967.
    The history is unclear about how Marvel decided to create their Captain Marvel. Stan L:ee has said he noticed that the name was available when MF Enterprises' version failed. Roy Thomas has said the Martin Goodman noticed the MF CM and told Stan Lee to create a CM for Marvel, but later Roy Thomas has said that he heard Stan give a talk where he said that a TV animation company wanted him to create a CM for them, set in outer space, and that is how it happened. The TV show ever happened, but the comic book did.
    Then Myron Fass sued Marvel for trademark infringement, and Marvel settled with him, paying him a few thousand dollars and securing the CM trademark.
    Marvel's second Captain Marvel, Monica Rambeau, first appeared n 1982, not the 1970's.
    DC never had the "copyright to the name," so they never could have lost it. The relevant property was the trademark, and nobody held it after Fawcett shut down their comics division, until Myron Fass said he did, and Marvel secured it in their lawsuit with him.
    It is a confusing history, and I only managed to get this right after years of research, cross-referencing, and interviews with many people, some of whom have since passed. A lot of these comments here have errors in their history. I think this is important history, and I just want to help get it straight.

  • @paterpater100
    @paterpater100 Рік тому +9

    I don't think many people would classify the marvel captain marvel movie as "great"

    • @Carabas72
      @Carabas72 Рік тому

      And you'd be wrong about that.

  • @jinchuriki7022
    @jinchuriki7022 Рік тому

    Interesting story

  • @AmArtGraphics
    @AmArtGraphics Рік тому +1

    There can only be one, and she won.

  • @dhenderson1810
    @dhenderson1810 Рік тому

    There was a short-lived TV series in the 1970's called "Legends Of The Superheroes".
    Let me explain this show. It was a show with 6 superheroes. They were Batman, Robin, Black Canary, Hawkman, Zantanna and, wait for it, Captain Marvel.
    It was Shazam but called him Captain Marvel.
    Some other facts about this show.
    1) It lasted 2 episodes.
    2) Batman was played by Adam West and Robin was played by Burt Ward.
    3) Further to that, it was the first live action showing of the Legion Of Doom. And in one of the episodes, it had the Riddler, played by Frank Gorshin.
    4) Superman and Wonder Woman were not used, because of legal reasons, pertaining to the "Superman" movies being out at the time, and the "Wonder Woman" TV series. For some reason, this meant that the characters couldn't be used on this show.

  • @LagunaShirogane
    @LagunaShirogane Рік тому +2

    One word is why: Copyrights. DC originally owned it and then their copyright expired and Marvel picked it up and created Capt. Marvel and Miss Marvel with it. Years later, DC reclaimed the copyright which accumulated in Marvel's Capt. Marvel to be renamed to Miss Marvel and then later on...they shared the name as long as Capt. Marvel DC comics were renamed which they were renamed Shazam as part of the agreement.

    • @-leaford1584
      @-leaford1584 Рік тому

      Wrong word. The word is trademark, not copyright.

    • @LagunaShirogane
      @LagunaShirogane Рік тому

      @@-leaford1584 Wasnt trying to be perfect. I knew I was close as trademarks and copyrights are similar.

    • @-leaford1584
      @-leaford1584 Рік тому

      @@LagunaShirogane The difference is significant if you want to understand the situation.
      Fawcett had both trademark and copyright over the original Captain Marvel.
      Copyright protects a creative work, for comics that's the writing, artwork, and character. It lasts for the lifetime of the creator, plus a number of years defined by statute. Fawcett's copyright never expired. It was eventually sold to DC
      Trademark covers marketing and branding of a product . For comics that's the title of the comic, the logos, slogans, and so on. Trademarks lapse if they aren't being used, and that's what Fawcett lost, because they weren't publishing comics using the name.
      Marvel took advantage of their opportunity to get the trademark by publishing their own Captain Marvel comics, but that didn't affect the copyright, which is why they had to create a brand new character and story.
      Later, DC obtained the copyright, giving them the legal right to publish stories featuring the original Captain Marvel, but since Marvel had the trademark, they couldn't use Captain Marvel in the title, logos, etc.
      There was never an agreement between Marvel and DC over this, there didn't need to be. Marvel had the trademark on the name, and copyright over their own character, but DC had the copyright on the original character and every right to publish stories with him, so long as they did not use the name in the title, or any logos, slogans, and so on associated with the Marvel character.

  • @Homer-OJ-Simpson
    @Homer-OJ-Simpson Рік тому

    This is so confusing! I don't know much about comic books but it seems there are similar confusing histories on many characters.

  • @leephillips4402
    @leephillips4402 Рік тому +1

    It gets even weirder when you factor in Miracle Man.

  • @RayMak
    @RayMak Рік тому +1

    Captain sparkle fingers

  • @kevinthielmann9408
    @kevinthielmann9408 Рік тому

    I like the Philly Fiascos the best lol

  • @maxximumb
    @maxximumb Рік тому

    Marvelous.