I have a 3060 ti with the anemic 8 GB of VRAM, wanted an actual upgrade so I was looking at the a770 with 16GB but thats a hard pass.... I think I might go with an AMD card. I want to keep the same level of performance with gaining some vram and not break the bank
@@HardWhereHero for the price you paid for the 3060ti, you can now get a rx6800 nonxt which is within a stone's throw of a 3080 with 16GB VRAM. If I wasnt stuck using nvidia broadcast and NVENC for streaming i would 100% buy a RX6000/RX7000 card. My current hope is to get a 4080/super but im not paying over $1k for it
@@HardWhereHeroif you can sell your 3060ti for something decent, I’d say get a 7800XT, or a 6800XT if the price is significantly more approachable. Although the 12GB of the 6700XT is more usable in the long-term vs the 3060ti, it’s otherwise a nearly exact lateral move performance-wise.
Bought the RX6700XT late last year. Never have and never will regret buying it. I literally upgraded from my RX580. Videos like these have kept me on the best price-to-performance upgrade path since overclocking the hell out of my GTX460 or up-bin flashing my R9-270 :) GeForce FX5200 < 7600GT < 8600GTS < GTX460 20% OC! < R9270 flashed to 270X < RX580 < RX6700
@@Q-bazZ That really is lol. I'll probably skip the 7000 generation but otherwise would you consider the 7700XT or 7800XT next? Only real difference is the 7800XT has 4 more gigs of VRAM. Not worth if you ask me.
Doing a price comparison as opposed to doing a series comparison is an amazing way to go about a review. The RX6700xt will be around for years and eventually become AMDs future version of the rRX580 8gb is now. A gpu that will outlive anything intel and Nvidia put out. Our last Nvidia gpu was a 1080Ti and even Nvidia admits that was a card so good they only released it in fear of AMD acting like Vega was going to be epic. The 3 gpus in our house currently are my 6950xt, a 6700xt and a 6650xt. We recently upgraded our 5 year olds pc from an RX580 8gb to the RX6650xt and I have to say it has been a very welcome surprise. The 6650xt feels so much better than a previous RX5700xt we had. AMD needs to focus on marketing and overall longevity , Nvidia needs to move on already and Intel is doing fantastic with driver updates and becoming more relevant. Thank you for the review. I need a catch up on your recent videos, I need to see if you have covered the 6650xt yet. At £200 it is a brilliant gpu.
RX580 was heavy used in mining riggs , so there is loot of them out there , and those can be VERY cheap I saw RX580 4gb go for 50€ and 8gb 70-100€ , I dunno how many RX6700 have sold , but number will 100% affect price .
RX 5700/RX 5700 XT are already the sucessors of RX 570/RX 580 and in years to come the RX 6700 and RX 6700 XT will fill those places for sure. The price/performance will be insanely great !
The longevity issue I was typing about , in regards to AMD, is exactly your statement as well. AMD need to support drivers longer. The AMD price to performance is undeniable and in a market where all newreleases will require systems that further push future gamers to consoles, the AMD cards will be in use far longer than any of the cards Nvidia has put out witht he 4 series. From the super bland slow 4060 to the fire starter 4090 that weighs and cost as much as a house.@@danimayb
I would hope that the 6700 XT would bear the 3060, because 5700 XT was going head to head with it and in some cases beating it. Still does for a great price.
I rock mine with a 1440p 165hz monitor no problem, most recent game i've been interested was Hogwarts Legacy and with some tweaks i ran it around 100fps easy
Yeah but still... 350 Euros for an almost three years card, that is just OK in 1080p without any ray tracing, on most recent titles at least. It's still steep imo. 1080P cards that cost 300 should be able to run CP77PL maxed out , ray tracig ultra included. Because if you should make concessions, better buy a 180-200 RX6600 and call it a day.
and the vanilla, rare 6700 is pretty much the same for a lower price and with the same amount of VRAM as the 3080. And still 4GB more than the 3060's you mostly see out there (the 6GB variant)
Which is kinda funny, how I got a hp OEM 3060ti from eBay for my 1440p monitor, but end up finding out that it can only run the modern titles at 1080p😂
Recently built a pc with i513400f n 6750xt and I'm over the moon. I upgraded from a 1050 laptop and also I bought everything on my own this time as I earn now so it felt really special.
People like to say the 6700xt is like new 580, but in-reality it fits more in the role of the new 1070, brand new it still is decently more expensive than the rest of low-mid range gpus, but not by a huge margin, and delivers notably better performance for the price while the 580 was direct competition of the almost low end midrange gpu from it's time, while the 6700xt still tails the 4060ti.
@@silverwerewolf975 sometimes, on average it still is slightly behind and unless you are playing something that maxes out the 8gb, or warzone, its a 4% lead for the 4060ti, or notably higher if it's using rt. What makes the 6700xt special is that it's notably cheaper, has more vram than the standard 4060ti model, and overall it's very good performance for the price while the 4060ti should've been the 4060/4050ti and it's more expernsive.
What’s interesting is despite the rx6700xt having a tdp of 240watts it usually settled around 170-185 in most games which was only 10-20 watts more power compared to the 3060 12gb.
Same with my 6800. For some reason even at 100% usage it never uses the rated wattage. Maybe the rated wattage is the maximum when it's over clocked to it's limit?
@@MrTorch-p4z is that a new or used card? I just purchased a second-hand MSI Gaming X Trio RX 6800 with warranty lasting till September 2024 with the price of $324 so far the card is great and very cool in temperature
yeah but theres a problem with the 5700 and 5700xt, is you dont know if they were used for mining.I was going to buy one for a second hand gaming computer and literally 15 sellers out of 15 said it was bios modded for mining
@@kyles8524 yeah I sold mine had to make sure I listed that it wasn't used for mining and it was taken care of made sure to clean it up before it sold. I think I sold it for $135 at auction
@@kyles8524 most of 5 series and 6 series were used for mining probably. But also 3rd series Nvidia. So buying only new ones is reassurance that it was not mining card. I found luckily RX 6800 used, but he was the first owner, card has stickers on screws and vents are completely silent, for 360e it was the best deal 👌
There's no such a thing as "mid range" and the 6750XT was never a part of what would be considered "mid range". People need to stop with all this misinformation.
One of the best purchases I have made in the video card category is the RX6700XT 12gb. From reviews, I knew it would work good enough, but I never expected the power of this GPU. Playing in 1440 with it is the norm for me but, there's quite a few I can go 4K and get great FPS, and even better FPS with FSR. Just a video or two ago, I had made the comment that I would love to see you review it, or use it in a build. I feel like I got my Christmas present haha. Thanks for all your hard work, you are very much appreciated!
I recently bought the RTX3060 12GB and RX6700xt as well. Crazy the 6700xt is a better card, but was costing less than the 3060. I'll use one in my new personal rig or use for customer builds. Either gonna do the brand new i9-9900k I have on hand or i5-12600KF.
@@Trick-Framed my thoughts exactly. I'll probably pair the i9-9900k with a 2070 Super I have on hand for a build to sell. I have tons of AMD shit on hand, too, and just ordered the 7800X3D on a good Newegg sale. I get all these parts and horde them because I can never decide what u wanna build for myself or as builds to sell. Lol
I have an i7 8700k. Would it be beneficial to upgrade to the 9900k? I would probably have to get a new motherboard because my current one (MSI Z370-A PRO) most likely won't be compatible with the 9900k.
@@BREEZYM6015 they are both LGA1151, but it would most likely need a BIOS update if you used the same Z370 mobo. Or you could find a deal on a new Z390 if you really wanted. The i9-9900k would be an improvement for sure. It has 2 more cores and 4 more threads and can be overclock usually to around 5Ghz.
Bit of a price difference here for new models at their cheapest. The 3060 12GB is $429 AUD (PNY XLR8 Gaming Verto) and the 6700 XT is $538AUD (Sapphire Pulse). The 8GB RX 6650 XT is a closer competitor in price and performance at $399 AUD (Powercolor Fighter), despite the lower VRAM capacity.
I use the RX6700 XT for a year now and I'm really happy with the performance in 1440p. I upgraded from the GTX 1070 which was also a very good card, maybe one of the best from Nvidia considering price and performance.
I check the price on my local market and they do have similar price range, around $200-ish. I bought mine 3060 for a $193 last month and there's actually a 6700xt that is a 2 dollar cheaper but considering the power draw, the size of the gpu and aesthetic (the card had no backplate) I decide to pick the 3060 as that is always my intention in the first place.
I bought my 12 gig 3060 for 258 brand new. It’s really all I need and if anything it’s overkill for me. I mostly play smaller games and occasionally a triple A game.
The 6700 XT is probably my favorite GPU of all time. My current 7900 XT is obviously much faster, but I loved the price to performance of the 6700 XT (got mine brand new for $279) and the utter rock solid stability of the drivers for that card. The 7900 XT is fairly stable too, especially compared to the glitchy drivers for the RTX 2070 I had before the 6700 XT, but it does have number of small niggles and quirks, mostly related to my dual monitor setup and going into/snapping out of sleep mode.
I just bought a used gigabyte rx6700 xt for 220 dollars and it also had 1 year of official warranty remaining One of the best purchases ive made and goes well with my 5600x and with SAM enabled it performs really well
i got a 6700xt and had nothing but problems for months. was able to return it. im glad other people are able to use them without issue and benefit from their good value.
I kept having blackscreens too and the drivers uninstalling themselves. Must of did ddu 30+ times. Was terrible. Got my eye on a 4070 now. Waiting for January in hopes the 4070 super is a similar price or 4070 price drops.
Only got a 6600XT which is much closer to the 3060 performance wise but, annoyance with a lack of certain hardware features aside, it's been perfectly good so far.
Thank you for these videos. I genuinely enjoy your budget conscious content and that you are retesting these cards in late 2023. And you test without upscaling technologies which gives us much more realistic performance numbers. Keep up the great work 🎉
You should introduce some of the new Alan Wake game as a benchmark, considering it's the new actual next gen game, maybe some Lords of The Fallen as well, it would be nice to see how gpu's fare against actually current games, I love the content don't get me wrong, but most of these games are pretty old or built on old engines.
wrong! Cyberpunk had an update which bumped requirements quiet a bit and its still one of the most demanding games. Alan Wake 2 works excellent on RX 6800, almost maxed out, though i only have 1080p monitor but with 144hz, it gives 80fps average. Starfield in the cities around 60 average, and up to 90fps in the open.
@@milosstojanovic4623 I dont know what you mean by wrong, Cyberpunk even with the updates is a last gen title. Alan Wake 2 introduced mesh shaders and Directx 12 Ultimate as requirements, while Lords of the Fallen has in built ray-tracing without any option to disable it, meaning AMD cards are quite bad at running the game without seriously reduced settings.
@@maxstill9216 Take a deep breath, and read again what i wrote, and try to not be Nvidia fanboy that much, some AMD cards are wiping the floor with Nvidia cards. I also wrote i have RX 6800 and it can still run newer games with high detail and high FPS. If someone wants RT that person not gonna buy cards like 3060 3070 4060 or similar but higher value cards like 4080 3080.
@@milosstojanovic4623 It seems you like talking to the voice in your head a lot, I read exactly what you said ,the video is not about an RX 6800, no one is a fanboy ,all I wanted to see was more benchmarks that are relevant to today's landscape of gaming, both AMD and Nvidia have good options, I dont know where you're getting the whole fanboy thing from, I have 2 systems, one has an RX 7600 that I'm very happy with , the other has an rtx 3080. No one is wiping the floor with anything either , AMD and NVidia cards perform about the same at about the same price points, which is to be expected, I'd say take a deep breath of air instead of that ganja you guys like smoking so much in the UK.
@@maxstill9216 same price point, is that a joke ? 4070 costs around 600e, so if you take into account that Nvidia is not near as cost effective as AMD 6th gen. And also no, they are not performing the same, Nvidia is better in RT. I talked about RX 6800 because you asked how cards perform in newer games, and those are Cyberpunk DLC update which is newer title with with newly implemented features which are in new games. Alan wake 2 i also have and said how RX 6800 is performing in that game to be "relevant" by what you asked, if you are smart as you think you are, just take away some fps from what i wrote and BOOM you will have 6700xt performance to see how that card performs. Lots of tests also on UA-cam. I am also not from UK. ;)
I am considering to get rx6700xt for gta 6 in mind , my specs are ryzen 5 5600g, 16gb ram single stick, b450 , 650 watt smps, Initially I thought for rx6600 but for safe side I think rx6700xt either 12gb is ok
the 6700XT is a amazing piece of hardware.... unless yours is the Reference one, i love mine, but have to undervolt and ulderclock it just to run below 100c hotspot isnt that great..... still better than the 3060ti tho.
Now its clear win for 6700xt..but back when i was purchasing 3060 for 480$ the 6700xt costed like 600-700$. For that price 3060 is clear winner as i tinker with AI, blender,premiere etc
haven't even watched the video but considering multiple online benchmarks and videos places the 3060 12GB on par with a 6600 or 6600XT I don't think the 3060 12GB has a hope in hell of beating a 6700 XT. the only similarity being the amount of vram
If you pair Rx 6700xt with an i5 13400f/ r7 5700x or higher for both you will get some years with quality gaming experience(At least in 1080p).When i purchased my 6700xt,i had an i5 8600k and in some games in 1080p the cpu bottlenecked the gpu.I upraded to an i5 13400f and the experience was a huge step forward(got a boost of 30 to 50 fps in majority of the games and no stuttering).If you want a good gaming experience remember that not only the gpu needs to be upgraded,keep in mind for the rest of the components (even the power supply)
I’d love to see a comparison with the Titan Xp. It also has 12gb of vram. That can also be bought for leas than the price of these 2 cards (I got one recently.
I just went through this decision 2 days ago building a rig for a friend. Decided on the 6700xt brand new for $309 US. After watching this video I am glad I went AMD for this one.
Comparing by price point is very much a good idea. If you're same level performance is a price point higher that kinda matters to most people. Including me, I'm poor(I financed my graphics card interest free also included starfield) I make enough to pay my bills and basically nothing else. I'm also not planning on replacing my gpu, rx 6800xt, for at least 4 years.
nice, this comparison is more useful than one would think; as the 12GB variants of 3060s are often very overpriced. Hopefully this will prevent some people from thinking the 3060 12GB is a peer card just because it's priced as much as a 6700XT.
you should do a video on the 6800 mate they can be picked up for under £400 for the price their performance will surprise you mate compared to other cards at that price range
@@kmc4682 It is because, of much higher VAT percentage (from 5 in USA to 27 in some Europe countries) and taxes. That's why sometimes cards cost +200 USD more in EU.
@@dustybadge167 Then i advise you to save up money instead, seriously! Don't waste your money on upgrading for.. what, 20% performance uplift? It's seriously not worth the hassle and your time even if you were to sell your current gpu.
@@dustybadge167I would consider RX 6600XT or RTX 3060 TI to be the best option for 1080p resolution. You got an RTX 2060 Super, and upgrading that GPU to something like a 3070 wouldn't make sense. RTX 2060 Super is something between a 3060 and a 3060 TI. It wouldn't make sense to get a 3070 as an upgrade from your current GPU. There are games that could reach 100% on something like a 4070 on 1080p at ultra settings, even though the card is meant for 1440p. I've taken a whole lot of research before i bought an RTX 3060 myself which was a bad choice by many for gaming, but i do a whole lot of stuff outside of gaming that needs more VRAM, i've considered even those GPU's out of my budget and i've done some research myself. I got not bad intentions, i'm telling you what would be the best purchase for you. Save up if you truly want to upgrade your GPU, going to an RTX 3070 would seriously be a waste of money, and not that much of an improvement that you probably expect.
Thanks for the 3060 vs 6700 XT head-to-head! Both cards are great either way you go, but for 1440p AAA gaming it's the 6700 XT that excels. The 12GB of VRAM for the 3060 is only now coming into play in 2023 after it bizarrely received criticism from some reviewers and pundits upon release. Anyone who has a 3060 today should be laughing the loudest. I actually won an RTX 3060 in a competition back in 2021 but never got the chance to use it as I was building a PC during the Great Parts Shortage. Skip ahead to April of this year and I **finally** completed the PC build after selling the 3060 for a 6750 XT. Nice to see what I could have gamed with vs the performance uplift over the previous card.
I'm not laughing honestly, and i still don't think i've made a bad purchase. 6700 XT was selling for $70 more than the budget i've had ($400). I'm not to be considered a full gamer, i tinker with AI stuff, and programs such as After effects, premiere pro, stable diffusion, topaz labs etc... I'm extremely happy with the performance, while quite overpriced, it still does wonders on both sides, gaming and workload. I know that AMD cards could pull off the same thing i'm doing with the 3060, but simply having a one click download, install and run without the addition of ROCm, installing linux instead and running programs, you know, the hassle to run AI stuff makes it so much easier.
I've got the RX 6700XT when it was released and i'm still very happy with it. I'm having a RTX 3060 8GB version lying around, if you want to test both cards in a duel. :')
RandomGaminginHD, it would be interesting to see if modern low-end GPUs, like the RX 7600 and 4060 are hobbled by the lack of PCIe 3.0 on classic CPUs like the i7 2600k. The PCIe x8 GPU bus width could be very problematic in a version 2.0 standard. Apparently, the i7 3770 (and 7-series chipset?) enabled PCIe 3.0. (you don't get PCIe 4.0 until 11th gen, like an i7 11700k, so that's kind of irrelevant for low-cost builds...)
Used RX 6700 XTs are probably the best entry lvl GPU buy you can do these days. I got a used one for a good price a while ago. It performs almost exactly the same in 1080p as my 7800 XT does in 1440p with same in-game settings and everything. So 6700 XT is a very capable 1080p GPU for modern games these days. It can do 1440p with modern games aswell if you turn down some settings, use upscaling/framegen and so on. Depends on what FPS you find acceptable i guess.
Got the 6700 XT a couple of weeks ago, and it is an absolute beast. I had purchased an a750, which worked well on games, generally speaking, but was buggy with my 1440p monitor. I do not regret the replacement purchase at all. Edit: I will say, though, the a750 does outshine the 6700 XT in terms of recording/rendering. The 6700 XT can do hardware acceleration, but the end results are often much larger file sizes than Nvidia or Intel offers. So, for now, I'm keeping the a750 for any rendering I need to do--and maybe check in on firmware updates to see if the bugginess with my monitor becomes less of an issue.
Without upscaling being used I just can't see this comparison as realistic, because with DLSS you are getting improved image quality over native res with higher frame rates. There is no reason not to use it.
I got a HP 3060 (OEM card) back in July for £209 (12GB VRAM in that too) and that's proved a great bang for buck card in my main pc - really good performer to its credit, I do think the 6700xt is 'better' and likely worth the ~20 quid extra or so but I don't think the 3060 is a bad card at all, way more bang for buck imo than some of the higher end and newer nvidia cards
I'm replacing that card with a 6700xt oc due to my 3060 running in the high 90s when gaming. Case swapping the omen into.a better box brought it down about 4°c but that still seems high. My wife's 580 keeps up with it in most games. I really hope the 6700 will be a better card.
I own a RTX 3060, nice card. And with a lot of modern tricks. DLLS really can help in games. As they say, buy the card you can get and in your budget...
I have a 2012 build Lenovo desktop and used the 1060 with the 430 watt power supply. It ran good. I recently brought a xfx force 6650xt and new 600 watt power supply and it runs great as the best 1080p card. I couldn't use a three fan GPU due to the old size Lenovo case.
In these economic times, most people dont have the money to always be on the bleeding edge of tech. Please keep up these types of videos detailing the best price-to-performance for the budget-conscious.
oh no, thats not good cpu for 4k, and card is not that good for 4k. If you wanna target 4k 6900 and ryzen 7 7800x, because by tests i watched 7800x3d and 7800x give basically the same fps on 4k, but in FHD and 1440p x3d is s winner by a lot.
@@milosstojanovic4623 i think it'll be fine for start. My r5 2600 rx5700 ran 4k30 no problem when i was on a 65" tv. I upgraded to a r5 5600 and a 144hz 1440p monitor and it works fine for 1440p 90ish fps. My girl has the same, but 6700xt and shes sitting above 120fps. Of course spending more and buying last gen top end would be optimal, but then that wouldnt make sense to reason of buying, some sense of a budget, and the restrictions of the current display. Why did you get a 6800 if you're recommending the 6900? It will get more than 100fps for sure...
@@NamTran-xc2ip your "fine" and our "fine" are not the same. People can be "fine" with 30fps, someone can be "fine" at 720p, it does not mean it is performing optimally.
There's no point besides the pricing to compare these cards. Been owning a 6700 XT for more than a year and it's an amazing card for the price, especially now when you can find it for around 320-340 euros where I live (sometimes 6750XT's go at the same price). I plan upgrading to a 7800XT next but waiting for a fair price
Ooo nice one. I'm gonna rebuild my old PC (i7 2600k era build 😢 + r9 290), with 6700xt. It's cheap for its price ( around 205$ used, unit only). Man, GPU prices are too much for third-worlder (+62). Bought my used r9 290 full sets for 365$ in August 2014 (the original user bought it in Feb at ~485 new). Nowadays for similar money (500$) you only get rx 7700 xt (new, used high-end gpu is very rare 😢).... Can't wait for the Chinese to enter the GPU market.
So if anybody has noticed, the 6700xt is limited to 186w not the 230w tdp. My asrock card does this as well and still produce reference numbers. So even watt for watt the 3060 is just showing how it was a mining sold to gamers lol
Mining cards are generally looked over better than the cards that were used for gaming. Although those cards were used for mining, they were underclocked, cleaned and taken care of in general much more often which makes em the better purchase. I don't know why mining forced consumers to think "oh the card was used 24/7, it's definitely gonna die sooner than the ones that were used for gaming". Constant temperature changes and high temps overall are the ones to blame, which is exactly what gamers do to their cards.
@@gateopssss and yes the miners rigs running at a constant higher temp than most games then being shut off then being run like they do all the time. Miners turn their rigs off and switch them around and sell cards and do trades. Miners are just more likely to break actual components just due to sheer volume of cards they’re working with let alone cables and psu.
Here in the Philippines a brand new 6700XT is much expensive than the 3060 and 4060. Also, is always out of stock and the second hand market here is really dry af.
It's crazy to think that's the same GPU PlayStation uses in the new gen consoles. Basically proving A PS5 is better than any pre-built computer you can get for under $1,500. Not only are the games optimized specifically for that GPU but when it's in the next gen console it runs with better ventilation and lower temperatures.
FSR 3 has been out for a while, while not that close in quality with DLSS, it allows 7000/6000 series of RX cards to enable Fluid motion (or frame generation) within the driver itself, allowing to run in in every game. Gaming wise, RX 6700 XT still takes the W.
he focused on the price as an equalizer, not a tier for tier comparison. Obviously the 3070 is a better card than the 6700XT but that wasn't the point of the video
In the middle east where I live the rtx 3060 is half the price of the rx 6700 xt in the second hand market around 140$ - 150$ and the amd card double that amount so certainly not a fair comparison here
My friend won't listen to me when I told him to get Rx 6700xt instead of the 3060 for his upgrade from gtx 1650 cause it's superior when it comes to price to performance ratio . The 6700xt was cheaper in our country by 50$ compared to 3060, both bnew. Welp
I don’t understand how the 3060 can fare so much better than my 2060 Super in CP2077. With ultra at 1080p without DLSS the average in the build in benchmark is just 45FPS. As far as I know there’s not that much of a difference between the two.
I Upgraded like 2 years ago from a 1070ti to a 6700Xt... Both have similar wattage but 6700xt has like 2.5x perfomance... Also, adrenalin driver is cooler than nvidia's panel...
6700XT's performance may be tempting, but FSR just looks bad compared to DLSS and upscalers are the most crucial feature. Especially for cards from this not so great performance range and for any card's longevity.
at higher resolution the difference is less noticable but its mostly just preference i think fsr looks decent though id rather have raw performance rather than upscaled one
I disagree, upscalers can be improved later on, but raw performance will always be the deciding factor at the end of the day. Leaving this much performance on the table just because a software feature of a card is better is ridiculous.
@@2MichalChojnowski2Completely agree, DLSS 3.5 looks noticeably better than fsr 2.2. Personally the image looks just fine with fsr at 4k. If you game at 4k you can live with it.
i don't get tired of watching videos telling me how smart i was buying a 6700XT
I convinced by buddy to get a 6700xt for his first PC. I was tempted to get one for myself lol, but not yet. 5600xt for me for now.
@@LakhdarGouchidame 174$
SAME HERE WITH 5 5600 BEST COMBO EVER
@@notmandoloriansame!!
I also got the rx 6700 xt, combined with the cpu Ryzen 5 7600x
rx 6700 xt is killing it
It always has been
I have a 3060 ti with the anemic 8 GB of VRAM, wanted an actual upgrade so I was looking at the a770 with 16GB but thats a hard pass.... I think I might go with an AMD card. I want to keep the same level of performance with gaining some vram and not break the bank
@@HardWhereHero for the price you paid for the 3060ti, you can now get a rx6800 nonxt which is within a stone's throw of a 3080 with 16GB VRAM. If I wasnt stuck using nvidia broadcast and NVENC for streaming i would 100% buy a RX6000/RX7000 card. My current hope is to get a 4080/super but im not paying over $1k for it
6600 or 6650xt was 3060 comp
@@HardWhereHeroif you can sell your 3060ti for something decent, I’d say get a 7800XT, or a 6800XT if the price is significantly more approachable. Although the 12GB of the 6700XT is more usable in the long-term vs the 3060ti, it’s otherwise a nearly exact lateral move performance-wise.
Bought the RX6700XT late last year. Never have and never will regret buying it. I literally upgraded from my RX580. Videos like these have kept me on the best price-to-performance upgrade path since overclocking the hell out of my GTX460 or up-bin flashing my R9-270 :)
GeForce FX5200 < 7600GT < 8600GTS < GTX460 20% OC! < R9270 flashed to 270X < RX580 < RX6700
Mine's VGA history was a similar one: From FX 5500 < 7600 GS (AGP) , GTX 460 < HD 7970 GE < GTX 1070 < RX 6700XT OC. 😅
@@Q-bazZ That really is lol. I'll probably skip the 7000 generation but otherwise would you consider the 7700XT or 7800XT next? Only real difference is the 7800XT has 4 more gigs of VRAM. Not worth if you ask me.
6700XT looks like great value, but I might treat myself to higher since I build so very infrequently
I love GPU upgrades:
GeForce 2 MX < 7300 GT (AGP) < 7950 GT (AGP) < 9800 GT < GTX 550 Ti < GTX 770 < GTX 980 Ti < RTX 2080 Ti < RX 7900 XTX
HD 5570 -> GTX 660 -> GTX 1660 TI -> RX 6700 XT
Doing a price comparison as opposed to doing a series comparison is an amazing way to go about a review. The RX6700xt will be around for years and eventually become AMDs future version of the rRX580 8gb is now. A gpu that will outlive anything intel and Nvidia put out.
Our last Nvidia gpu was a 1080Ti and even Nvidia admits that was a card so good they only released it in fear of AMD acting like Vega was going to be epic.
The 3 gpus in our house currently are my 6950xt, a 6700xt and a 6650xt. We recently upgraded our 5 year olds pc from an RX580 8gb to the RX6650xt and I have to say it has been a very welcome surprise. The 6650xt feels so much better than a previous RX5700xt we had. AMD needs to focus on marketing and overall longevity , Nvidia needs to move on already and Intel is doing fantastic with driver updates and becoming more relevant.
Thank you for the review. I need a catch up on your recent videos, I need to see if you have covered the 6650xt yet. At £200 it is a brilliant gpu.
That outlive token seems a little counterintuitive when AMD seem to stop making drivers far earlier than Nvidia do for their cards.
RX580 was heavy used in mining riggs , so there is loot of them out there , and those can be VERY cheap I saw RX580 4gb go for 50€ and 8gb 70-100€ , I dunno how many RX6700 have sold , but number will 100% affect price .
RX 5700/RX 5700 XT are already the sucessors of RX 570/RX 580 and in years to come the RX 6700 and RX 6700 XT will fill those places for sure. The price/performance will be insanely great !
Will hopefully test the 6650xt soon :)
The longevity issue I was typing about , in regards to AMD, is exactly your statement as well. AMD need to support drivers longer. The AMD price to performance is undeniable and in a market where all newreleases will require systems that further push future gamers to consoles, the AMD cards will be in use far longer than any of the cards Nvidia has put out witht he 4 series. From the super bland slow 4060 to the fire starter 4090 that weighs and cost as much as a house.@@danimayb
I would hope that the 6700 XT would bear the 3060, because 5700 XT was going head to head with it and in some cases beating it. Still does for a great price.
Please up the video quality to 4K60fps :)
3060 is waste of money honestly.
it does 90 percent of the time
I rock mine with a 1440p 165hz monitor no problem, most recent game i've been interested was Hogwarts Legacy and with some tweaks i ran it around 100fps easy
Of course, 6700XT is way beyond 5700 XT
The 6700xt was a strong 1440p card a couple of years ago and is now a phenomenal 1080p.
man and im only looking into buying one now :(
Yeah but still... 350 Euros for an almost three years card, that is just OK in 1080p without any ray tracing, on most recent titles at least. It's still steep imo. 1080P cards that cost 300 should be able to run CP77PL maxed out , ray tracig ultra included. Because if you should make concessions, better buy a 180-200 RX6600 and call it a day.
It can still 1440p.
and the vanilla, rare 6700 is pretty much the same for a lower price and with the same amount of VRAM as the 3080. And still 4GB more than the 3060's you mostly see out there (the 6GB variant)
Which is kinda funny, how I got a hp OEM 3060ti from eBay for my 1440p monitor, but end up finding out that it can only run the modern titles at 1080p😂
Recently built a pc with i513400f n 6750xt and I'm over the moon. I upgraded from a 1050 laptop and also I bought everything on my own this time as I earn now so it felt really special.
My recently purchased 6700 XT is crazy good, probably the best price to performance card in 2023 and early 2024
People like to say the 6700xt is like new 580, but in-reality it fits more in the role of the new 1070, brand new it still is decently more expensive than the rest of low-mid range gpus, but not by a huge margin, and delivers notably better performance for the price while the 580 was direct competition of the almost low end midrange gpu from it's time, while the 6700xt still tails the 4060ti.
Used 5700 xt is more in line with being the new 580. Switched from a 480 8g to one this year.
rx6600 the 1050 ti of the past.
All RTX 4060 cards are a pile of 💩. Even on sale when the deal looks good it’s still bad.
Tails? Its sometimes even better 😂
@@silverwerewolf975 sometimes, on average it still is slightly behind and unless you are playing something that maxes out the 8gb, or warzone, its a 4% lead for the 4060ti, or notably higher if it's using rt.
What makes the 6700xt special is that it's notably cheaper, has more vram than the standard 4060ti model, and overall it's very good performance for the price while the 4060ti should've been the 4060/4050ti and it's more expernsive.
What’s interesting is despite the rx6700xt having a tdp of 240watts it usually settled around 170-185 in most games which was only 10-20 watts more power compared to the 3060 12gb.
Same with my 6800. For some reason even at 100% usage it never uses the rated wattage. Maybe the rated wattage is the maximum when it's over clocked to it's limit?
@@OffTheRailGaming d*mn you just mentioned a legendary card here.
6800 is hardly available in where I live
@@DanarKhNisa sorry to hear that my friend. I hope you have good luck in the future!
@@DanarKhNisa its still available in PH for 300$
@@MrTorch-p4z is that a new or used card? I just purchased a second-hand MSI Gaming X Trio RX 6800 with warranty lasting till September 2024 with the price of $324
so far the card is great and very cool in temperature
Got a 6750XT for $340 was cheaper than my 5700XT was in 2020. AMD has the midrange on lock now
7700XT still too expensive. No-brainer to buy a 7800XT for 50 bucks more.
yeah but theres a problem with the 5700 and 5700xt, is you dont know if they were used for mining.I was going to buy one for a second hand gaming computer and literally 15 sellers out of 15 said it was bios modded for mining
@@kyles8524 yeah I sold mine had to make sure I listed that it wasn't used for mining and it was taken care of made sure to clean it up before it sold. I think I sold it for $135 at auction
@@kyles8524 most of 5 series and 6 series were used for mining probably. But also 3rd series Nvidia. So buying only new ones is reassurance that it was not mining card. I found luckily RX 6800 used, but he was the first owner, card has stickers on screws and vents are completely silent, for 360e it was the best deal 👌
There's no such a thing as "mid range" and the 6750XT was never a part of what would be considered "mid range".
People need to stop with all this misinformation.
Lovin my RX 6700 XT! Paired with my 5700X
That's exactly my setup with 8x4 Gb of RAM.
such a great year for amd 2020 was, you can also upgrade to 5800x3d giving 20-30% better performance, if you have a GPU for it..
@@niks660097 honestly im planning soon, that 5800X3D is getting my attention
Thats what I plan my setup to be and have for a year.
How much watt psu needed for this combo?
I use the 6700 xt for vr and 4k/4k fsr2 quality setting gaming and it works great. Plays anything from half life alyx to Hogwarts legacy
Awesome :)
woud've liked to see performance with upscaling included in the video
One of the best purchases I have made in the video card category is the RX6700XT 12gb. From reviews, I knew it would work good enough, but I never expected the power of this GPU. Playing in 1440 with it is the norm for me but, there's quite a few I can go 4K and get great FPS, and even better FPS with FSR. Just a video or two ago, I had made the comment that I would love to see you review it, or use it in a build. I feel like I got my Christmas present haha. Thanks for all your hard work, you are very much appreciated!
I recently bought the RTX3060 12GB and RX6700xt as well. Crazy the 6700xt is a better card, but was costing less than the 3060. I'll use one in my new personal rig or use for customer builds. Either gonna do the brand new i9-9900k I have on hand or i5-12600KF.
The i5 CRUSHES the the i9 in this situation. No matter how much you OC that i9. Stick with the i5, sell the i9.
@@Trick-Framed my thoughts exactly. I'll probably pair the i9-9900k with a 2070 Super I have on hand for a build to sell. I have tons of AMD shit on hand, too, and just ordered the 7800X3D on a good Newegg sale. I get all these parts and horde them because I can never decide what u wanna build for myself or as builds to sell. Lol
I think what mostly makes people lean more towards the 3060 is the power consumption. 170w and 230w is quite a big difference
I have an i7 8700k. Would it be beneficial to upgrade to the 9900k? I would probably have to get a new motherboard because my current one (MSI Z370-A PRO) most likely won't be compatible with the 9900k.
@@BREEZYM6015 they are both LGA1151, but it would most likely need a BIOS update if you used the same Z370 mobo. Or you could find a deal on a new Z390 if you really wanted. The i9-9900k would be an improvement for sure. It has 2 more cores and 4 more threads and can be overclock usually to around 5Ghz.
I play games in 4k with my rx6700xt. It can't handle all games in 4k but.. a large majority of what I'm playing, it plays great.
I copped my 6700 for $200 not long ago and it crushes. So happy I found it and that it’s in the available. range for the new update as well.
Helpful video! I'm firmly in the team red camp, but nice to see a money for performance comparison. Just picked up the RX 6700 XT for $309 US
Bit of a price difference here for new models at their cheapest. The 3060 12GB is $429 AUD (PNY XLR8 Gaming Verto) and the 6700 XT is $538AUD (Sapphire Pulse). The 8GB RX 6650 XT is a closer competitor in price and performance at $399 AUD (Powercolor Fighter), despite the lower VRAM capacity.
I use the RX6700 XT for a year now and I'm really happy with the performance in 1440p.
I upgraded from the GTX 1070 which was also a very good card, maybe one of the best from Nvidia considering price and performance.
One friend of mine bought a used 6700 XT for like $180. That’s an insane amount of fps per dollar
That's what I paid for a used 3060 12GB last October
I just bought an open box 6700 XT yesterday for $274 USD... it still has a lot of fuel in the tank for the next few years ... I call that a win
Thank you for this review! The cards are similarly priced here, in Romania.
My GPU is RTX 3060. I see a video about RTX 3060, I click on and watch it
My RTX 3060 is crying because of the loss but still smiling because it has DLSS 🥲
Nice :)
Thanks for making this, not surprised by the results but it's still fascinating to see!
I check the price on my local market and they do have similar price range, around $200-ish. I bought mine 3060 for a $193 last month and there's actually a 6700xt that is a 2 dollar cheaper but considering the power draw, the size of the gpu and aesthetic (the card had no backplate) I decide to pick the 3060 as that is always my intention in the first place.
I got an RX 6800 last year and tends to beat out the RTX 3070 by a small margin. Nice having 16 GB of V Ram as well.
I have the RX 6750 XT in my build pared with the Ryzen 9 5900X. Best build I have ever owned. No plans to upgrade for many years to come lol.
still thr case?
I bought my 12 gig 3060 for 258 brand new. It’s really all I need and if anything it’s overkill for me. I mostly play smaller games and occasionally a triple A game.
Yeah just buy what's ur purpose of buying. 🎉🎉 No need costly gpus if u don't fit ur purpose.😊
The 6700 XT is probably my favorite GPU of all time. My current 7900 XT is obviously much faster, but I loved the price to performance of the 6700 XT (got mine brand new for $279) and the utter rock solid stability of the drivers for that card. The 7900 XT is fairly stable too, especially compared to the glitchy drivers for the RTX 2070 I had before the 6700 XT, but it does have number of small niggles and quirks, mostly related to my dual monitor setup and going into/snapping out of sleep mode.
I just bought a used gigabyte rx6700 xt for 220 dollars and it also had 1 year of official warranty remaining
One of the best purchases ive made and goes well with my 5600x and with SAM enabled it performs really well
I'm thinking between these two graphica card, but as I need GPU for productivity first, gaming second, 3060 is a way to go!
The 3070 is a tragedy of a product with only 8GB of vRAM and 2080Ti performance level.
In my place, used prices of RX 6700xt are closer to that of 3060 ti and 3070
i got a 6700xt and had nothing but problems for months. was able to return it. im glad other people are able to use them without issue and benefit from their good value.
Did you used an Nvidia GPU before you use 6700XT?
Yeah I just put my GTX 1070 back in. Games i had stutters on my 6700xt i had 0 with my 1070. @@jeangunnhildr3765
I kept having blackscreens too and the drivers uninstalling themselves. Must of did ddu 30+ times. Was terrible. Got my eye on a 4070 now. Waiting for January in hopes the 4070 super is a similar price or 4070 price drops.
Only got a 6600XT which is much closer to the 3060 performance wise but, annoyance with a lack of certain hardware features aside, it's been perfectly good so far.
Thank you for these videos. I genuinely enjoy your budget conscious content and that you are retesting these cards in late 2023. And you test without upscaling technologies which gives us much more realistic performance numbers. Keep up the great work 🎉
You should introduce some of the new Alan Wake game as a benchmark, considering it's the new actual next gen game, maybe some Lords of The Fallen as well, it would be nice to see how gpu's fare against actually current games, I love the content don't get me wrong, but most of these games are pretty old or built on old engines.
wrong! Cyberpunk had an update which bumped requirements quiet a bit and its still one of the most demanding games. Alan Wake 2 works excellent on RX 6800, almost maxed out, though i only have 1080p monitor but with 144hz, it gives 80fps average. Starfield in the cities around 60 average, and up to 90fps in the open.
@@milosstojanovic4623 I dont know what you mean by wrong, Cyberpunk even with the updates is a last gen title.
Alan Wake 2 introduced mesh shaders and Directx 12 Ultimate as requirements, while Lords of the Fallen has in built ray-tracing without any option to disable it, meaning AMD cards are quite bad at running the game without seriously reduced settings.
@@maxstill9216 Take a deep breath, and read again what i wrote, and try to not be Nvidia fanboy that much, some AMD cards are wiping the floor with Nvidia cards. I also wrote i have RX 6800 and it can still run newer games with high detail and high FPS. If someone wants RT that person not gonna buy cards like 3060 3070 4060 or similar but higher value cards like 4080 3080.
@@milosstojanovic4623 It seems you like talking to the voice in your head a lot, I read exactly what you said ,the video is not about an RX 6800, no one is a fanboy ,all I wanted to see was more benchmarks that are relevant to today's landscape of gaming, both AMD and Nvidia have good options, I dont know where you're getting the whole fanboy thing from, I have 2 systems, one has an RX 7600 that I'm very happy with , the other has an rtx 3080.
No one is wiping the floor with anything either , AMD and NVidia cards perform about the same at about the same price points, which is to be expected, I'd say take a deep breath of air instead of that ganja you guys like smoking so much in the UK.
@@maxstill9216 same price point, is that a joke ? 4070 costs around 600e, so if you take into account that Nvidia is not near as cost effective as AMD 6th gen. And also no, they are not performing the same, Nvidia is better in RT. I talked about RX 6800 because you asked how cards perform in newer games, and those are Cyberpunk DLC update which is newer title with with newly implemented features which are in new games. Alan wake 2 i also have and said how RX 6800 is performing in that game to be "relevant" by what you asked, if you are smart as you think you are, just take away some fps from what i wrote and BOOM you will have 6700xt performance to see how that card performs. Lots of tests also on UA-cam. I am also not from UK. ;)
6700XT is a beast, I've had it just under a year from the 1660Ti and it's been great. I'll probably only upgrade it when GTA 6 for PC releases.
I am considering to get rx6700xt for gta 6 in mind , my specs are ryzen 5 5600g, 16gb ram single stick, b450 , 650 watt smps,
Initially I thought for rx6600 but for safe side I think rx6700xt either 12gb is ok
the 6700XT is a amazing piece of hardware....
unless yours is the Reference one, i love mine, but have to undervolt and ulderclock it just to run below 100c hotspot isnt that great.....
still better than the 3060ti tho.
do an rx 7600 and rx 6700xt comparison!
Good call :)
xt better
Great idea
The RTX 3060 was eaten from A to Z by the RX 6700 XT.
bought it last month, happy to have chosen it
Now its clear win for 6700xt..but back when i was purchasing 3060 for 480$ the 6700xt costed like 600-700$. For that price 3060 is clear winner as i tinker with AI, blender,premiere etc
haven't even watched the video but considering multiple online benchmarks and videos places the 3060 12GB on par with a 6600 or 6600XT I don't think the 3060 12GB has a hope in hell of beating a 6700 XT. the only similarity being the amount of vram
How does the 3060 12GB hold up against the RX 6700 10GB variant?
There is no comparison between the 3060 and the 6700xt. The 6700xt simply crushes the 3060 outright.
If you pair Rx 6700xt with an i5 13400f/ r7 5700x or higher for both you will get some years with quality gaming experience(At least in 1080p).When i purchased my 6700xt,i had an i5 8600k and in some games in 1080p the cpu bottlenecked the gpu.I upraded to an i5 13400f and the experience was a huge step forward(got a boost of 30 to 50 fps in majority of the games and no stuttering).If you want a good gaming experience remember that not only the gpu needs to be upgraded,keep in mind for the rest of the components (even the power supply)
I’d love to see a comparison with the Titan Xp. It also has 12gb of vram. That can also be bought for leas than the price of these 2 cards (I got one recently.
great video, thx for sharing this.
I just went through this decision 2 days ago building a rig for a friend. Decided on the 6700xt brand new for $309 US.
After watching this video I am glad I went AMD for this one.
Only fanboys get 3060 over 6700xt or even 6600xt!
Comparing by price point is very much a good idea. If you're same level performance is a price point higher that kinda matters to most people. Including me, I'm poor(I financed my graphics card interest free also included starfield) I make enough to pay my bills and basically nothing else. I'm also not planning on replacing my gpu, rx 6800xt, for at least 4 years.
nice, this comparison is more useful than one would think; as the 12GB variants of 3060s are often very overpriced. Hopefully this will prevent some people from thinking the 3060 12GB is a peer card just because it's priced as much as a 6700XT.
you should do a video on the 6800 mate they can be picked up for under £400 for the price their performance will surprise you mate compared to other cards at that price range
Wow card in eu are so expensive. I just bought 6800xt gamingx trio for just 330$
@@kmc4682 It is because, of much higher VAT percentage (from 5 in USA to 27 in some Europe countries) and taxes. That's why sometimes cards cost +200 USD more in EU.
Please make the 3070 vs 6700 XT comparison soon, I'm thinking about buying one of these as a upgrade to my 2060S
The absolute best upgrade from your GPU would make sense if you went for something like a 4070, or an RX 6800.
@@gateopssss yeah, but they are way too expensive where I live
@@dustybadge167 Then i advise you to save up money instead, seriously!
Don't waste your money on upgrading for.. what, 20% performance uplift? It's seriously not worth the hassle and your time even if you were to sell your current gpu.
@@gateopssss even for 1080p?
@@dustybadge167I would consider RX 6600XT or RTX 3060 TI to be the best option for 1080p resolution.
You got an RTX 2060 Super, and upgrading that GPU to something like a 3070 wouldn't make sense. RTX 2060 Super is something between a 3060 and a 3060 TI. It wouldn't make sense to get a 3070 as an upgrade from your current GPU.
There are games that could reach 100% on something like a 4070 on 1080p at ultra settings, even though the card is meant for 1440p.
I've taken a whole lot of research before i bought an RTX 3060 myself which was a bad choice by many for gaming, but i do a whole lot of stuff outside of gaming that needs more VRAM, i've considered even those GPU's out of my budget and i've done some research myself.
I got not bad intentions, i'm telling you what would be the best purchase for you. Save up if you truly want to upgrade your GPU, going to an RTX 3070 would seriously be a waste of money, and not that much of an improvement that you probably expect.
Thanks for the 3060 vs 6700 XT head-to-head! Both cards are great either way you go, but for 1440p AAA gaming it's the 6700 XT that excels.
The 12GB of VRAM for the 3060 is only now coming into play in 2023 after it bizarrely received criticism from some reviewers and pundits upon release. Anyone who has a 3060 today should be laughing the loudest.
I actually won an RTX 3060 in a competition back in 2021 but never got the chance to use it as I was building a PC during the Great Parts Shortage. Skip ahead to April of this year and I **finally** completed the PC build after selling the 3060 for a 6750 XT. Nice to see what I could have gamed with vs the performance uplift over the previous card.
I'm not laughing honestly, and i still don't think i've made a bad purchase. 6700 XT was selling for $70 more than the budget i've had ($400).
I'm not to be considered a full gamer, i tinker with AI stuff, and programs such as After effects, premiere pro, stable diffusion, topaz labs etc...
I'm extremely happy with the performance, while quite overpriced, it still does wonders on both sides, gaming and workload.
I know that AMD cards could pull off the same thing i'm doing with the 3060, but simply having a one click download, install and run without the addition of ROCm, installing linux instead and running programs, you know, the hassle to run AI stuff makes it so much easier.
@@gateopssss There's no way you found a 3060 for less than a 6750XT unless you mean a used 3060 vs a new 6750XT.
@@JustAGuy85 It was more expensive, people bought it more than the 3060 so the stores increased the price, not a big surprise
@@gateopssss Doubt it.
Online stores certainly didn't do that because Nvidia fanboys will ALWAYS pay more for less.
I love how you say "back in the day" like this is an ancient card
Haha yeah I thought about that after. A long time ago in 2021 haha
I've got the RX 6700XT when it was released and i'm still very happy with it.
I'm having a RTX 3060 8GB version lying around, if you want to test both cards in a duel. :')
RandomGaminginHD, it would be interesting to see if modern low-end GPUs, like the RX 7600 and 4060 are hobbled by the lack of PCIe 3.0 on classic CPUs like the i7 2600k. The PCIe x8 GPU bus width could be very problematic in a version 2.0 standard. Apparently, the i7 3770 (and 7-series chipset?) enabled PCIe 3.0. (you don't get PCIe 4.0 until 11th gen, like an i7 11700k, so that's kind of irrelevant for low-cost builds...)
Used RX 6700 XTs are probably the best entry lvl GPU buy you can do these days. I got a used one for a good price a while ago. It performs almost exactly the same in 1080p as my 7800 XT does in 1440p with same in-game settings and everything. So 6700 XT is a very capable 1080p GPU for modern games these days. It can do 1440p with modern games aswell if you turn down some settings, use upscaling/framegen and so on. Depends on what FPS you find acceptable i guess.
Got the 6700 XT a couple of weeks ago, and it is an absolute beast. I had purchased an a750, which worked well on games, generally speaking, but was buggy with my 1440p monitor. I do not regret the replacement purchase at all.
Edit: I will say, though, the a750 does outshine the 6700 XT in terms of recording/rendering. The 6700 XT can do hardware acceleration, but the end results are often much larger file sizes than Nvidia or Intel offers. So, for now, I'm keeping the a750 for any rendering I need to do--and maybe check in on firmware updates to see if the bugginess with my monitor becomes less of an issue.
Would you mind if you do a direct comparison between RTX 3060 ti & RX 6700 XT?
Without upscaling being used I just can't see this comparison as realistic, because with DLSS you are getting improved image quality over native res with higher frame rates. There is no reason not to use it.
Actually excited to see this
The only problem with tdp and ray tracing
Main Problem with rtx 3060 not enough for 1440p and raytracing and 6600xt can be had for cheaper
2060-4060 cant run RTX, so what is the point? paying for nothing
I got a HP 3060 (OEM card) back in July for £209 (12GB VRAM in that too) and that's proved a great bang for buck card in my main pc - really good performer to its credit, I do think the 6700xt is 'better' and likely worth the ~20 quid extra or so but I don't think the 3060 is a bad card at all, way more bang for buck imo than some of the higher end and newer nvidia cards
I'm replacing that card with a 6700xt oc due to my 3060 running in the high 90s when gaming. Case swapping the omen into.a better box brought it down about 4°c but that still seems high. My wife's 580 keeps up with it in most games. I really hope the 6700 will be a better card.
Everytime I’m on eBay the cards are so close to msrp it’s not worth it 😭
I own a RTX 3060, nice card. And with a lot of modern tricks. DLLS really can help in games. As they say, buy the card you can get and in your budget...
I have a 2012 build Lenovo desktop and used the 1060 with the 430 watt power supply. It ran good. I recently brought a xfx force 6650xt and new 600 watt power supply and it runs great as the best 1080p card. I couldn't use a three fan GPU due to the old size Lenovo case.
Good video
In these economic times, most people dont have the money to always be on the bleeding edge of tech. Please keep up these types of videos detailing the best price-to-performance for the budget-conscious.
From a 550 4GB FROM A 6700XT 12GB CHALLENGER OC, the best change.
Im interested in the 4k performance. Building my friend a 4k pc and looking at the ryzen 5 7600 w/ 6800 xt
oh no, thats not good cpu for 4k, and card is not that good for 4k. If you wanna target 4k 6900 and ryzen 7 7800x, because by tests i watched 7800x3d and 7800x give basically the same fps on 4k, but in FHD and 1440p x3d is s winner by a lot.
@@milosstojanovic4623 i think it'll be fine for start. My r5 2600 rx5700 ran 4k30 no problem when i was on a 65" tv. I upgraded to a r5 5600 and a 144hz 1440p monitor and it works fine for 1440p 90ish fps. My girl has the same, but 6700xt and shes sitting above 120fps. Of course spending more and buying last gen top end would be optimal, but then that wouldnt make sense to reason of buying, some sense of a budget, and the restrictions of the current display. Why did you get a 6800 if you're recommending the 6900? It will get more than 100fps for sure...
@@milosstojanovic4623Stop saying bullshit, it's fine for 4k with appropriate settings
@@NamTran-xc2ip your "fine" and our "fine" are not the same. People can be "fine" with 30fps, someone can be "fine" at 720p, it does not mean it is performing optimally.
I bought a used 3060 12GB recently because I got it at decent price with 2 years warranty
There's no point besides the pricing to compare these cards. Been owning a 6700 XT for more than a year and it's an amazing card for the price, especially now when you can find it for around 320-340 euros where I live (sometimes 6750XT's go at the same price). I plan upgrading to a 7800XT next but waiting for a fair price
Comparing based on price instead of SKU makes more sense in real world scenarios when talking about shopping for a used card
Ooo nice one. I'm gonna rebuild my old PC (i7 2600k era build 😢 + r9 290), with 6700xt. It's cheap for its price ( around 205$ used, unit only).
Man, GPU prices are too much for third-worlder (+62). Bought my used r9 290 full sets for 365$ in August 2014 (the original user bought it in Feb at ~485 new).
Nowadays for similar money (500$) you only get rx 7700 xt (new, used high-end gpu is very rare 😢).... Can't wait for the Chinese to enter the GPU market.
What is going on with the Assassin's Creed footage? Both cards seem to be glitching out the character models.
So if anybody has noticed, the 6700xt is limited to 186w not the 230w tdp. My asrock card does this as well and still produce reference numbers. So even watt for watt the 3060 is just showing how it was a mining sold to gamers lol
Mining cards are generally looked over better than the cards that were used for gaming. Although those cards were used for mining, they were underclocked, cleaned and taken care of in general much more often which makes em the better purchase. I don't know why mining forced consumers to think "oh the card was used 24/7, it's definitely gonna die sooner than the ones that were used for gaming". Constant temperature changes and high temps overall are the ones to blame, which is exactly what gamers do to their cards.
@@gateopssss and yes the miners rigs running at a constant higher temp than most games then being shut off then being run like they do all the time. Miners turn their rigs off and switch them around and sell cards and do trades. Miners are just more likely to break actual components just due to sheer volume of cards they’re working with let alone cables and psu.
Production of 6700XT has been discontinued; used ones for mining are being sold under the guise of new ones.
Here in the Philippines a brand new 6700XT is much expensive than the 3060 and 4060. Also, is always out of stock and the second hand market here is really dry af.
Built a new computer today with a i9 12900KS 347.00 thought that was a good deal so it was time to build.
It's crazy to think that's the same GPU PlayStation uses in the new gen consoles. Basically proving A PS5 is better than any pre-built computer you can get for under $1,500. Not only are the games optimized specifically for that GPU but when it's in the next gen console it runs with better ventilation and lower temperatures.
Cool video as usual, but i'd like to note that EVERY game tested has DLSS as an option, which is generally considered to be better than FSR, so yeah
FSR 3 has been out for a while, while not that close in quality with DLSS, it allows 7000/6000 series of RX cards to enable Fluid motion (or frame generation) within the driver itself, allowing to run in in every game.
Gaming wise, RX 6700 XT still takes the W.
A closer competitor to the 6700 XT is the 3060 Ti
True, almost every benchmark I've seen has the two cards neck and neck. The 3060ti is usually more expensive though.
he focused on the price as an equalizer, not a tier for tier comparison. Obviously the 3070 is a better card than the 6700XT but that wasn't the point of the video
I have ryzen 5 5600g and 650watt 80plus bronze psu , is psu enough for Rx 6700xt
In the middle east where I live the rtx 3060 is half the price of the rx 6700 xt in the second hand market around 140$ - 150$ and the amd card double that amount so certainly not a fair comparison here
My friend won't listen to me when I told him to get Rx 6700xt instead of the 3060 for his upgrade from gtx 1650 cause it's superior when it comes to price to performance ratio . The 6700xt was cheaper in our country by 50$ compared to 3060, both bnew. Welp
Hey, what is your ambient temperature when doing these tests? I got the Dell 6700XT, the temperature is kinda wack. Wondering if I got bad GPU.
6700xt crew check in
Interesting video
Would love to see FSR and AFMF against DLSS and frame generation
I just sold my laptop 5900HX/3070 & add a lil bit & grabbed a 13900HX/4080 12GB instead... Frame gen really awesome my guy... 💯☕
I don’t understand how the 3060 can fare so much better than my 2060 Super in CP2077. With ultra at 1080p without DLSS the average in the build in benchmark is just 45FPS. As far as I know there’s not that much of a difference between the two.
I Upgraded like 2 years ago from a 1070ti to a 6700Xt... Both have similar wattage but 6700xt has like 2.5x perfomance... Also, adrenalin driver is cooler than nvidia's panel...
would love to see an rx 6700 10gb review
He's already done one. It's not surprising, basically 2/3rds of the way between a 6600 and 6700 XT
Some of the 0,1% lows, are bad for the 6700 XT
6700XT's performance may be tempting, but FSR just looks bad compared to DLSS and upscalers are the most crucial feature. Especially for cards from this not so great performance range and for any card's longevity.
at higher resolution the difference is less noticable but its mostly just preference i think fsr looks decent though id rather have raw performance rather than upscaled one
I disagree, upscalers can be improved later on, but raw performance will always be the deciding factor at the end of the day. Leaving this much performance on the table just because a software feature of a card is better is ridiculous.
@@HunterTracks FSR is already 2,5 years old and still looks bad, so I woudn't hope for much improvement later on - AMD just can't or doesn't care.
@@2MichalChojnowski2Completely agree, DLSS 3.5 looks noticeably better than fsr 2.2.
Personally the image looks just fine with fsr at 4k. If you game at 4k you can live with it.