How this new stealth plane keeps the US ahead of China

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 5 чер 2024
  • But at a steep cost
    Use code SEARCHPARTY at the link below to get an exclusive 60% off an annual Incogni plan: incogni.com/searchparty
    The United States just unveiled its newest stealth bomber, the B-21 Raider. It completed its first test flight in November 2023 after more than 10 years of research and development. Much remains classified, but it's safe to say this will be one of the most advanced pieces of technology ever made. Its most important characteristic is stealth. The US claims that it can evade even the most advanced air-defense systems on earth - hence why it’s currently costing about $700 million to build one of them. This video explains why the US believes the money is not only worth it … but a national security imperative.
    Special Thanks: Todd Harrison, Robert Farley, Tom Ordeman, Dan Grazier
    Sources: docs.google.com/document/d/1o...
    Welcome to Search Party!
    Search Party is a new, independent, video news show that combines experienced journalism and visual design to decode the most complex stories in international sports and geopolitics.
    Subscribe and turn on notifications 🔔 so you don't miss any videos: / @search-party
    Become a Search Party Original member today: / @search-party
    About:
    Search Party is led and produced by Sam Ellis, a journalist, director, editor, and animator based in New York City. For more than 6 years, Ellis produced the hugely popular video series, Vox Atlas, for which he earned an Emmy nomination. He specializes in breaking down the most complex new stories and presenting them with a refreshing, accessible, and engaging visual style.
    He’s produced explainers on some of the world’s thorniest geopolitical stories; from corruption scandals in Latin America, conflict in the Middle East, and the rise of China, to the world of sports; the Monaco Grand Prix, the FIFA corruption scandal, and the 100-foot waves of Nazaré, Portugal. Ellis has also directed multiple episodes of TV; notably on Netflix’s ‘Explained’ and HBO Sport’s ‘Level Playing Field’.
    Got story ideas or tips? Reach out to the team at:
    Twitter: / swellis_
    Email: sam@searchparty.ch

КОМЕНТАРІ • 1,2 тис.

  • @Search-Party
    @Search-Party  Місяць тому +42

    Use code SEARCHPARTY at the link below to get an exclusive 60% off an annual Incogni plan: incogni.com/searchparty

    • @sherlockmaverick
      @sherlockmaverick 20 днів тому +2

      When is Search Party coming to Nebula?

    • @StatusNull
      @StatusNull 20 днів тому

      yessir!

    • @user-uy1rg8td1v
      @user-uy1rg8td1v 20 днів тому

      Great UA-cam video and channel, but I found the background music was a little too loud and distracting. I would strongly suggest you get rid of it altogether. I firmly believe that background music is distracting, annoying, and unnecessary (especially for educational or opinionated videos with lots of talking). I also believe that people want to hear you speak/get information/hear your opinions and not hear generic background music that doesn't really add anything useful and that people have to mentally filter out. Plus it will be one less thing you will have to do when making videos. Thank you for your consideration.

    • @juliane__
      @juliane__ 18 днів тому

      8:46 What is about the H-20, does it not come close to the abilities? Is he that sure, because he has espionage information to proove that?
      I guess he moved the scales to come to the conclusion.

    • @GreenVibezIguanaDaddy
      @GreenVibezIguanaDaddy 16 днів тому +1

      UA-cam really needs to come up with a way to block the sponsored ads, Its ridiculous I pay $23 god damn dollars a month to not have ads and bs and why you guys are allowed to cram this in is beyond me.

  • @enryumazino3939
    @enryumazino3939 20 днів тому +1918

    The actual reason why they don't have universal healthcare 💀

    • @conflictvideo3014
      @conflictvideo3014 20 днів тому +87

      Nah, not really

    • @Thisisntreal103
      @Thisisntreal103 20 днів тому +292

      Crazy as it sounds. If you look at their budget they can actually afford both and still have money to spare. The U.S. is just stuck in a stupid self made either / or situation

    • @radustana
      @radustana 20 днів тому +33

      ​@@Thisisntreal103was about to say this

    • @jojonesjojo8919
      @jojonesjojo8919 20 днів тому

      In the US, corporations and billionaires have bought the politicians, so they set policy. Military Industrial wants these planes. The healthcare corporations like things the way they are.
      Couldn't really call it a democracy anymore.

    • @jaredj631
      @jaredj631 20 днів тому +28

      The real reason we don’t have Global Tierney

  • @chrism2465
    @chrism2465 20 днів тому +945

    My father is retired USAF he had a saying: Fighters are propaganda Bombers set national policy.

    • @CouncilOfTheWolf
      @CouncilOfTheWolf 20 днів тому +27

      Heh. Though I guess you also can't use your bombers if the air space is contested, so fighters are important too.

    • @mgboltstwitch6921
      @mgboltstwitch6921 20 днів тому +7

      @@CouncilOfTheWolf STEALTH BOMBER honestly no idea

    • @CouncilOfTheWolf
      @CouncilOfTheWolf 20 днів тому +40

      @mgboltstwitch6921 Stealth planes become more detectable as they approach their targets and enter the intersections of multiple radars, there's no such thing as perfectly stealthy. And bombers are slow. If they're physically seen in the sky, it's easy to shoot them. If the opposite was true of anything I just said, fighters or multi role jets like the F-22 and the F-35 would've never existed.

    • @RaNc0R
      @RaNc0R 20 днів тому +20

      @@mgboltstwitch6921stealth doesn’t mean plane is invisible, it still can be tracked using low frequency dual band radars, it still have IR signature, ofc the visuals.

    • @muhcharona
      @muhcharona 20 днів тому +2

      @@RaNc0R Yea Ukraine and Houthi's have called old assumptions into question, no doubt this applies with this one as well.

  • @JoySingh
    @JoySingh 20 днів тому +563

    10:29 to everyone, that's confused about the 203 billion dollar evaluation. You're going to understand that it's over 30 years which includes maintenance and costs,

    • @conflictvideo3014
      @conflictvideo3014 20 днів тому +51

      This are the same people who freak out about the cost of f35 being over 1.5T but don't know it includes all the maintenance and support for the f35 life time. Also the US didn't spend 1.5T others countries also foot in the bill

    • @radustana
      @radustana 20 днів тому +39

      ​@@conflictvideo3014not to mention that 1.5 trillion also include the technological upgrades that it will receive over its 50+ year service life

    • @tonysu8860
      @tonysu8860 20 днів тому +5

      I don't think this comment is right Are you serious that you think the B-21 can be manufactured and operated for at 30 years for only $200B? What do really think annual operating expenses will be over those 30 plus years? What do you think it costs to fly this aircraft per hour?
      Your math doesn't work out by a very, very long shot

    • @tjadams8
      @tjadams8 20 днів тому +20

      @@conflictvideo3014 Yea.. How dare people freak out about our Gov spending $1.5T on airplanes, since our healthcare system is great & vets are so well taken care of. We should be happy to pay $90,000 for $500 bearings, while tens of thousands of vets lay homeless, not getting the help they need because VA funding was cut. But hey, look at those pretty airplanes...
      & Enlighten me on how much our allies, that refuse to spend money on their own defense, footed of our $1.5T bill? What a joke.

    • @beepboop9848
      @beepboop9848 20 днів тому +1

      @@conflictvideo3014 dude thats still a fucking crazy amount tho

  • @alexwilliams1548
    @alexwilliams1548 20 днів тому +706

    As a pilot, we are playing offense, not defense

    • @rat2244
      @rat2244 20 днів тому +70

      The best defense is offense

    • @Frizzleman
      @Frizzleman 20 днів тому +63

      So you admit to being a warmongering empire?

    • @SuperRavensfan101
      @SuperRavensfan101 20 днів тому +73

      @@Frizzleman I dont think any American *myself included* contests that the government likes to have the biggest stick and knows how to swing it. Brutal truth is as much as I hate how my country spends its budget, Either party we vote for spends it the same way so no matter which way we vote nothing changes in terms of defense policy. I hope you know that a countries people doesn't equal the feeling of its government.

    • @mjaraz5442
      @mjaraz5442 20 днів тому +7

      You must be a tree-hugging pacifist. I guess you never heard of shock and awe.

    • @joesanpatricio794
      @joesanpatricio794 20 днів тому

      Yeahhh the US isn’t “playing offense”, it’s an empire. US foreign policy can best be compared to the machinations of organized crime. Except where the mob might dominate a neighborhood or a city, the mayonnaise mafia in control of the US has made a racket of the majority of the world

  • @MaxxSkywalker
    @MaxxSkywalker 20 днів тому +646

    I honestly prefer the geopolitical stories over the sports stories.

    • @StarKillerSK
      @StarKillerSK 20 днів тому +3

      Yeah mee too

    • @zumabbar
      @zumabbar 20 днів тому +47

      i prefer both since sports are often also political

    • @MaxxSkywalker
      @MaxxSkywalker 20 днів тому +18

      @@zumabbar I'm not a huge fan of sports so I have a general disinterest in that topic, but every video I've seen from this channel, regardless of the topic (sports or otherwise), has been topnotch.

    • @pauljewett8844
      @pauljewett8844 20 днів тому +8

      I don’t, I’m the type of guy who likes to watch anime as much as they love to play football, and this channel scratches that incredibly nieche itch for nerdy politics and sports. Keep on rocking brother

    • @phrous
      @phrous 20 днів тому

      This is also good segment

  • @bruno3
    @bruno3 20 днів тому +145

    0:08 "This mysterious airplane took flight for the first time".
    And at least a dozen people who saw it added one more "UFO" to their list of sightings. "I'm telling y'all, I saw it with my own two eyes! That ain't no airplane!"

    • @GarciaDorelion
      @GarciaDorelion 20 днів тому +1

      Was about to say the same. Isn't that the flying saucer ??

    • @RetroBlockade
      @RetroBlockade 20 днів тому

      All a UFO is, is an Unidentified Flying Object, so if anything in the sky hasn't been identified by the viewer, it is a UFO. So if someone saw this in the sky and didn't know what it was, then it is a UFO.

    • @raspoie4915
      @raspoie4915 18 днів тому +2

      wouldn't be surprised if a portion of UFO sightings was just the nation's air force testing out their newest toy

    • @einautofan6685
      @einautofan6685 13 днів тому +1

      This kind of shape is around since the reveal of B-2A...😜🤣

    • @einautofan6685
      @einautofan6685 13 днів тому

      The good thing is, nobody believes in "Believers"! Soo, Area 51, keep going!😉😎👍

  • @fdangleshadang-a-lang7149
    @fdangleshadang-a-lang7149 18 днів тому +126

    The B21 is actually a fairly bargain deal for such a prestigious aircraft. They’re actually coming in under budget and on time, which is the exact opposite of how the F35’s development took place. $700m for a stealth bomber is a good price when you consider a Boeing 787 is almost $250m

    • @shakiMiki
      @shakiMiki 17 днів тому +12

      A country where life expectancy is falling, people go hungry & many do not have access to health care. Yeah a bargain.

    • @gravoc857
      @gravoc857 17 днів тому

      @@shakiMiki Bud, America entered the global hegemony game centuries ago. We’re stuck in a global chess match. What do you suggest? Focus on Americans and move towards isolationism? If that’s your desire or goal, then what’s your plan to off-ramp from the global stage? How do we ensure our economic powerhouse if we aren’t globally present? How do we stop ourselves from being subjugated by Russia or China, who both desire the power the US currently has.
      People who make the argument you’re making are generally passionate, moral finger waggers, who are both ignorant and naive to the nature of reality we find ourselves in.

    • @qorekt5169
      @qorekt5169 17 днів тому +19

      ​@@shakiMiki honestly could be worse compared to what other countries are doing. Not the best but not the worst

    • @imhimdk1785
      @imhimdk1785 17 днів тому +21

      @@shakiMikimany of those ppl in America has a chance to change there lives everyday. Ik America is worse off than before but being broke in America is far better than being broke in almost every other country

    • @davestopforth
      @davestopforth 17 днів тому +15

      ​@@shakiMiki if it bothers you so much why don't you move to China or Russia?
      I agree with your sentiment, the decline we are seeing right now is not good, but that is what people voted for, and military spending is not optional, so when the elected politicians are utterly incompetent then the budget cuts affect the people, not the military.
      If you want to cut military spending then you're giving the likes of China the green light to invade, and trust me, communism is infinitely worse than the free market. Communism doesn't cut welfare and public spending simply because there is no welfare and public spending.
      So if you don't like it, I suggest you move to a country with less military spending so that you can understand why its important in the first place.

  • @guykibler255
    @guykibler255 19 днів тому +15

    Something that might be useful to mention is that bombers in modern US doctrine act more as mobile cruise missile platforms, rather than traditional bombers. B-52s are completely non-survivable in a modern conflict, but if you mount air-launched cruise missiles on them, that becomes a lot less of a problems. Some ALCMs have ranges of over 1,000km and newer ones themselves even have stealth features. You can essentially fire cruise missiles from outside detection range, and the launching aircraft or missiles can be stealthy themselves.

  • @DidierPeroni
    @DidierPeroni 19 днів тому +97

    As expensive as these might be- this is the kind of technology that made America what it is today.

    • @Gunni1972
      @Gunni1972 18 днів тому +4

      LOL, you are not wrong about that. But i think you should take a good look around, and see, just HOW SCARED people are.

    • @mikajarvio7489
      @mikajarvio7489 17 днів тому +5

      Terror nation Nr.1

    • @PCLinke
      @PCLinke 17 днів тому

      What make US today is its geolocation, it's so far away and so big to get invade.
      They know this ofcourse and only building such bombers to use them somewhere else to destroy any threat against their interest.

    • @anthonymako9784
      @anthonymako9784 15 днів тому

      👏

    • @ChristoffelTensors
      @ChristoffelTensors 15 днів тому

      Deluded? How is this the thing that beats China if we can’t even produce bombs to drop

  • @Cergun_
    @Cergun_ 20 днів тому +34

    Imagine the amount of spending that could be prevented if humans weren’t hardwired to fight wars for economic, religious, political, ideological, etc… reasons.

    • @daviecrocket9160
      @daviecrocket9160 18 днів тому +8

      That's a world without islam

    • @Gunni1972
      @Gunni1972 18 днів тому +10

      @@daviecrocket9160 It goes way beyond Islam. It's about De-training people from Worshipping, Comparing to, and Ridiculing others. Basically : Let go of Competition. and start to embrace Cooperation. In ancient times "Cheap labour" was created by enslaving people. Do you want that, to become "Competetive" again?

    • @Mr.KARANI
      @Mr.KARANI 17 днів тому

      Humans are not wired to fight but USA is.

    • @2x2is22
      @2x2is22 17 днів тому

      Well, the American defense budget is 10% of all federal spending. So if you were able to get rid of the military entirely, you're really only saving 10%. It wouldn't even be enough to fund this universal healthcare everyone wants

    • @carholic-sz3qv
      @carholic-sz3qv 14 днів тому

      @@daviecrocket9160 wooooow how pathetic is the comment?! what was the USA doing around the world, in the middle east for decades?! Irac, Syria, Vietnam..... all those useless wars for nothing at all!

  • @flennboyd6413
    @flennboyd6413 18 днів тому +43

    Please name the defense companies involved, in this case, it's Northrop Grumman.

    • @antonpavlov9019
      @antonpavlov9019 18 днів тому +5

      Probably they had to sponsor the video for that lol

    • @abel_underwater
      @abel_underwater 5 днів тому

      @@antonpavlov9019 I’m sure the 500k+ dead Russians wish they had their own NG😹 but you already knew that Ivan. Congrats on the tactical shovels and the cope cages tho Mr.#2militaryinZaWrld!

    • @antonpavlov9019
      @antonpavlov9019 5 днів тому

      @@abel_underwater I'm from Ukraine actually, but I don't find anything funny in the fact that people are dying. I wish you never find out how it is be a citizen of a country at war

  • @teddies1992
    @teddies1992 20 днів тому +14

    Looking forward to the Euro 2024 video. Should be a good tournament this year!

    • @solehsolehsoleh
      @solehsolehsoleh 13 днів тому

      Talking about Euro huh? I wonder if this channel going to talk about Eurovision too. It's, kinda, sport and geopolitical.

  • @LeMatt87n
    @LeMatt87n 20 днів тому +75

    Do one on Poland. Hear me out:
    A once major power in Europe got taken off the map for over 100years, then subjugated for a long time until its people deposed communist rule.
    Now they are on track to be Europe’s largest land army as they defend NATO on its eastern flank. Theyre proud of national hero’s like pope John Paul, Copernicus, Chopin, Mary Curie, jozef pilsudski, Witold Pilecki (the guy that broke into and back out of Auschwitz to provide intelligence to the Polish govt in exile).
    They tried to form a regional block called Intermarium during the interwar period and they may be trying to do that again.

    • @Mexalen81
      @Mexalen81 20 днів тому +15

      I'd love to see Poland dial down the nationalism and right-wing oriented politics. They could replace France and Germany as the leading force in europe in the long run.

    • @hordegaming4771
      @hordegaming4771 20 днів тому +2

      Yes, but A the USSR is no more B the EU are more like them nowadays and C Poland gets the most money from the EU yet "hates them"
      If you hate them sooooooooo much? LEAVE THEN, do what we did. But they won't because they're hypocrites 😊

    • @LeMatt87n
      @LeMatt87n 20 днів тому

      @@hordegaming4771 I agree, they should leave EU behind.

    • @Mexalen81
      @Mexalen81 20 днів тому +13

      @@hordegaming4771 i take it, that you're from the UK.
      If so: from what news comes across the channel, it doesn't look like the population actually benefited from Brexit or is actually happy about the outcome.
      I don't see how that counts as a success story for other countries to follow.

    • @mikoajm122
      @mikoajm122 20 днів тому

      @@Mexalen81​​⁠​⁠ 8 years of shameless corruption and propaganda by conservatives, people had enough. Opposition managed to gather centrists, liberals, leftists in huge compromise. 74% voter turnout. People won voting against previous gov.
      Nobody in Europe listened us when Russia started war in Georgia and years later in Donbas and Crimea. Unfortunately due to internal policies and years of negligence, Poland wake up too late with army spending.
      ~80% of Poles are in favour of EU. Don’t get distracted by loud minority.

  • @user-yh1nm1vy3i
    @user-yh1nm1vy3i 20 днів тому +53

    Considering another country’s strong air defense as a national security threat is kinda crazy if you think about it…

    • @great_aymen
      @great_aymen 20 днів тому +7

      It really is yes, and no one has mentioned it in the comments so far

    • @diollinebranderson6553
      @diollinebranderson6553 20 днів тому +13

      Thats how winners stay ahead tbh. If you dont consider all potential threats youll just fall

    • @diollinebranderson6553
      @diollinebranderson6553 20 днів тому +13

      Think about it. If war ever breaks out with the country that has the most advanced defense, you already want to know how to beat it.
      This goes for same countries to the US but they just dont have the money nor power

    • @proxy3386
      @proxy3386 19 днів тому

      If you can’t penetrate another country’s increasingly sophisticated air defenses - especially for a projecting superpower like the United States - then it is considered a national security risk, because you can’t operate with any MAD-like doctrine, and are just stuck with defending against [example nation]. If you can’t attack targets reliably, then… yeah.

    • @vinceszigetvari6137
      @vinceszigetvari6137 19 днів тому

      It is crazy, but it also make the most sense if we take mutually assured destruction into account. The guarantee that you won't get nuked is your capacity to nuke back. So another country's air defense is actually a big threat.

  • @fredstewart7333
    @fredstewart7333 20 днів тому +81

    Maybe I’m missing something but how does 100 planes times $700M per plane come to $203B?

    • @CerebroJD
      @CerebroJD 20 днів тому +101

      R&D costs before they actually start producing the actual planes.

    • @hostedbysimples5416
      @hostedbysimples5416 20 днів тому +15

      As said above: R&D...
      But I believe that the costs of the planes that are made first is way higher than those following it (in principle). They should be constantly tested, modified and well maintained, which implies new infrastructure being build.
      Plus the production and assembly is much more costly at first as it's inefficient.
      I think the 200 Billion is the expected price of all the endeavor, while the 700 Million is the ultimate price of the planes without considering all the caveats.
      Maybe, I'm not a millitary expert...

    • @shaneben8745
      @shaneben8745 20 днів тому +27

      Unit price vs life cycle cost of the program. The 700m is the cost of purchasing the aircraft. The 200B is the projected cost of running the entire program over however many years its planned on operating for, including fuel, parts, salaries, ammunition ect. It's like say buying a car for 20k, but over the 5 years you own it, you'll pay additional money to insure, run, maintain, ans upgrade it, overall coming to a cost much more than the original 20k you bought it for

    • @You_are_Right_
      @You_are_Right_ 20 днів тому +8

      @@shaneben8745I always hated how people talk about what it “costs” and used that as a way to protest a military program. They include everything yet we never do it for a building. It’s called upkeep/running costs. It’s odd to me. everything you said it true.

    • @ricochettheprotogen4928
      @ricochettheprotogen4928 20 днів тому +1

      R&D costs,adjusting facilities,maintenance

  • @philipwilliamson5332
    @philipwilliamson5332 20 днів тому +70

    I'm all for thinking ahead for situations that can honestly impact national security. But I REALLY wish they thought ahead when it also came to healthcare, education, infrastructure and the everyday working person.

    • @randus7053
      @randus7053 20 днів тому +13

      In all fairness that is the job of your state, not the Federal government, constitutionally speaking, unless legally the feds can do almost anything under the pretense of the general welfare clause.

    • @samstromberg5593
      @samstromberg5593 20 днів тому

      Seriously like I’m all for helping out allies and everything but I’m sure we’re all familiar with how you have to put on your own oxygen mask first?

    • @Flightman453
      @Flightman453 20 днів тому +3

      @@randus7053 Uh, I’m sorry? It quite is the job of the federal government. They need to be investing in the country. That’s why everything is falling apart.

    • @Y2B123
      @Y2B123 19 днів тому +3

      @@randus7053 States cannot optimally implement many policies because they are forced to have free trade and movement with other states. So federal intervention is very much necessary.

    • @ElectronFieldPulse
      @ElectronFieldPulse 18 днів тому +11

      @@Flightman453- No, it isn’t falling apart at all. Have you looked at our economic data compared to peer nations? We are doing better than pretty much all of Europe. The NHS in Britain is falling apart while we are responsible for 50 percent of all global new drug discoveries. We have onshored things like chip production and given heavy tax breaks for things like green energy. This has drawn a lot of companies from Europe to the US. We spend nearly the most out of the world on education. What I suspect you mean is that you want more free services (well, free to you) provided by the federal government. It is almost a constant in young people, they think it is just as simple as having the government provide everything and the world would be so much better! It doesn’t work like that at all. We are doing very well right now, this country is not collapsing in the slightest.

  • @producedbypodcast
    @producedbypodcast 20 днів тому +5

    Always interesting topics, great quality and well produced. Wouldn't mind more frequent videos, haha. Thanks and keep it up!

    • @Search-Party
      @Search-Party  20 днів тому +2

      we're publishing every 2 weeks this summer!

  • @BreadyToCrumble
    @BreadyToCrumble 20 днів тому +45

    It's always a good day when Search Party uploads!

  • @ephinem
    @ephinem 13 днів тому +2

    A 737 is 300m so paying twice the price is not that crazy

  • @saadganie3558
    @saadganie3558 20 днів тому

    Search Party is amazing 🎉
    Can't wait to see the upcoming videos 🙌

  • @Davethreshold
    @Davethreshold 19 днів тому +17

    That money is NOT a risk. This design will work. Everything that we have designed in the last ten years works as planned.

    • @1ycan-eu9ji
      @1ycan-eu9ji 18 днів тому +2

      Just like the Zumwalt, oh wait

    • @Yt699Dutch
      @Yt699Dutch 16 днів тому +2

      Except the economy.

    • @torresthemonster
      @torresthemonster 16 днів тому

      Besides the helicopter

    • @2goober4u
      @2goober4u 14 днів тому +3

      ​@@1ycan-eu9ji Zumwalt was designed way more than 10 years ago

    • @robertharper3754
      @robertharper3754 14 днів тому

      @@1ycan-eu9ji, that's the Navy, and they've been "touched in the head" for far too long. They got high on their own supply of BS thinking they're the best and can't be defeated ever, they, like the other branches as well as our government and populace need to wake up and deal with reality.

  • @Magmanic
    @Magmanic 20 днів тому +12

    1/3 the cost of a B2

    • @ebrimajallow9631
      @ebrimajallow9631 20 днів тому +1

      Inflation

    • @dogsbecute
      @dogsbecute 20 днів тому +10

      @@ebrimajallow9631 .....a plane that costs $700 million today vs a plane tht costs $2 billion today has nothing to do with inflation, it literally means one is cheaper. what the hell

    • @ebrimajallow9631
      @ebrimajallow9631 19 днів тому +1

      @@dogsbecute really? Are you POSITIVELY SURE?

    • @user-fi9st4uk6m
      @user-fi9st4uk6m 19 днів тому +1

      @@ebrimajallow9631 ? no thats not inflation

    • @ebrimajallow9631
      @ebrimajallow9631 19 днів тому

      @@user-fi9st4uk6m 700 million from 1990s is today almost 1.7 billion dollars.

  • @joeyj9638
    @joeyj9638 18 днів тому +1

    The fact that the Raider is being talked about, only mean there’s something scarier in the shadows, lurking, buying it’s time until it goes DOWN!

  • @LiverPrime1
    @LiverPrime1 18 днів тому

    i’m loving this channel, great refreshing stuff. you’ve earned a subscriber.

  • @olegkovalev4135
    @olegkovalev4135 20 днів тому +5

    If you build sophisticated offensive hardware it tells everything about your intentions on global scale..

    • @olegkovalev4135
      @olegkovalev4135 20 днів тому

      The mindset of being offensive is pure evil and thre is nothing glorious about it.

  • @sashazach9387
    @sashazach9387 20 днів тому +4

    absolutely excellent production quality. Great topic too.

  • @agonforreal
    @agonforreal 20 днів тому +1

    Love your videos! Are you still planning on doing videos on the Saudi football league and LIV golf?

  • @Presprism
    @Presprism 3 дні тому +1

    Always interesting topic, well crafted storytelling and production. 👍🏻

  • @FeRoOOo71
    @FeRoOOo71 18 днів тому +6

    10:20 this is how a 9 year old imagines stealth in a plane 😂😂😂

  • @notarealperson9709
    @notarealperson9709 20 днів тому +74

    meanwhile Russia is sending in meatwaves on top of chinese golf carts to the front line

    • @fivetimesyo
      @fivetimesyo 20 днів тому +14

      And winning...

    • @hostedbysimples5416
      @hostedbysimples5416 20 днів тому +3

      Those are two different philosophies for two very much distinct situations by two different players. Making a comparison as simple as that is pretty much pointless...
      Unless this is a joke and I don't have a good sense of humor... that too.

    • @invertedsounds8112
      @invertedsounds8112 20 днів тому

      ​@@fivetimesyo Winning against homemade Ukraine drones 💀

    • @burnttoast9890
      @burnttoast9890 20 днів тому +2

      Well one side is obviously winning against the other which is supported by multiple countries

    • @ANONPROFILE001
      @ANONPROFILE001 20 днів тому +8

      @@fivetimesyo I mean yeah they have a population 4x bigger...

  • @keatscubes
    @keatscubes 18 днів тому

    Super helpful! Couldn't find any info on taking green cuttings

  • @MechAnonymous
    @MechAnonymous 20 днів тому +1

    Talk about the tools and mechanics that keep things like tanks going

  • @Itsmarkyoung
    @Itsmarkyoung 20 днів тому +83

    “We just don’t have the budget to address homelessness in all major cities right now, we are working closely with local officials to come up with solutions”

    • @oeliamoya9796
      @oeliamoya9796 20 днів тому +1

      I was told the same thing here in Florida! I wonder where all the money went....

    • @johnmontag
      @johnmontag 20 днів тому

      So much money gets stolen and mismanaged for homelessness and addiction. California has 10’s of billions “lost” that was earmarked for it

    • @IndigoSeirra
      @IndigoSeirra 20 днів тому +15

      Perhaps the trillions in healthcare spending that disappear into insurance companies might have something to do with that.

    • @kingace6186
      @kingace6186 20 днів тому +2

      When it comes to the US, there is always money. The scarcity is in political will.

    • @kingace6186
      @kingace6186 20 днів тому

      @@IndigoSeirra Bingo! We care about insurance companies & health corporations, not people.

  • @6ixieMoe
    @6ixieMoe 17 днів тому +5

    Here’s an idea, design a program to analyze insect and bird flight patterns using AI and compare it to jets/bombers. Use it in conjunction with existing radar technology and there you go stealth technology obsolete. I read somewhere that radar picks up everything there’s nothing truly invisible. It’s just programmed to pick up on larger objects

    • @lucasjenkinson
      @lucasjenkinson 15 днів тому +1

      Really good idea.

    • @2goober4u
      @2goober4u 14 днів тому +1

      that's why we still use SEAD and EW systems

  • @Mishn0
    @Mishn0 18 днів тому +2

    @1:40 caption says P-51, image says P-40

  • @niczim123
    @niczim123 15 днів тому +1

    Continuing the upcoming sports subject that you mentioned, you should consider covering the Stanley Cup Playoffs. The most elusive trophy in all of sports! And this year they've been insane so far it has everything from compelling stories, bad officiating, intense rivalries, miraculous saves, shots, hits and of course fights!

  • @mbz16v
    @mbz16v 20 днів тому +4

    Fantastic piece of journalism...y'all
    are crushing it!!!

    • @heynicetomeetyou
      @heynicetomeetyou 20 днів тому +1

      This is poor journalism since they don't give us options to choose from or encourage us to think on our own, but they give us the answer instead

  • @zukacs
    @zukacs 20 днів тому +11

    It looks so sick. Cant wait until they declassify this and F35 in 50 years so my jaw drops

    • @Davethreshold
      @Davethreshold 20 днів тому

      These are UA-cam/military who know where the secret airframes are buried. After watching these channels for a couple days, your head will spin! I get amazed every day learning about War-Tech. Please look up, F-35, F-22 Raptor, and RADAR. 🖤 www.youtube.com/@SandboxxApp www.youtube.com/@DefenseUpdates/videos

    • @Gunni1972
      @Gunni1972 18 днів тому

      Ready for some Foot-in mouth then?

  • @davidbrain283
    @davidbrain283 11 днів тому +1

    As an American I couldn’t feel any prouder or more excited seeing this stuff. This stuff is so damn cool and if it means better deterrence that’s all you can ask for.

  • @MistaFadora
    @MistaFadora 15 днів тому

    Hello! Can i ask what program you used to animate and make your videos?

  • @IntegrandoConhecimento
    @IntegrandoConhecimento 20 днів тому +4

    2:20 Sonar sound. Radar emits electromagnetic waves. But I imagine it was a creative choice.

  • @user-pp5or5og4k
    @user-pp5or5og4k 20 днів тому +16

    There are way less than 62 operational B1-B. They are broke more often than not. It is also the most expensive aircraft to operate per hour in the Air Force.

    • @chriskerwin3904
      @chriskerwin3904 20 днів тому +4

      They look phenomenal though, it's a shame we never built the Valkyrie for purely aesthetic reasons.

    • @FeRoOOo71
      @FeRoOOo71 18 днів тому

      ​@@chriskerwin3904the look phenomenal? 😂

  • @potatoeaterpro
    @potatoeaterpro 20 днів тому

    this is actually made super well
    i love the editing the voice does sound a bit funny

  • @MrTrevortxeartxe
    @MrTrevortxeartxe 6 днів тому

    $70,000 dollars is "too much," but now it's 92 MILLION. Car dependency is unreasonably expensive.

  • @JtrainMedia
    @JtrainMedia 20 днів тому +3

    Mmm yes. A new Search Party video with my morning coffee. It's a good day!

  • @BigBoiiLeem
    @BigBoiiLeem 20 днів тому +13

    Ah yes, deterrence: the act of holding a gun to our heads and telling us we're safe

  • @rumchjoe
    @rumchjoe 20 днів тому +2

    This video seems dated. The displayed video date is May 16, 2024 but what is the actual date?

  • @Lostlife656
    @Lostlife656 20 днів тому +2

    Worth it. Love cool military tech

  • @LizardSpork
    @LizardSpork 20 днів тому +24

    If you can't speak softly while carrying a big stick then speak loudly and carry the biggest stick.

    • @fivetimesyo
      @fivetimesyo 20 днів тому +2

      America doesn't understand the concept of speaking softly

    • @AnErrantPhoton
      @AnErrantPhoton 20 днів тому +4

      @@fivetimesyo The United States understates its capabilities every time they talk about a defense article. "This thing can go x miles per hour with a range of y nautical miles. I won't tell you what the max is though. If I do, I'm lying. It can do better."

    • @churblefurbles
      @churblefurbles 20 днів тому +3

      @@AnErrantPhoton Recuitment numbers and the Red Sea say otherwise, the specs are questionable and the stick is hollow.

    • @anon69_q
      @anon69_q 19 днів тому

      @@churblefurbles How are recruitment numbers correlated with the capabilities of hardware? Also, the bark was worse than the bite in the Red Sea.

    • @BOOZMadre
      @BOOZMadre 19 днів тому

      Speak Japanese and Carry a Katana 🗾

  • @heynicetomeetyou
    @heynicetomeetyou 20 днів тому +29

    This video comes with a clear message: We need them. How is it different from propaganda?

    • @ExTern-nl4ov
      @ExTern-nl4ov 20 днів тому +11

      So every time a conclusion ends with a clear note, its propaganda? Get your definitions right dude

    • @heynicetomeetyou
      @heynicetomeetyou 20 днів тому

      @@ExTern-nl4ov when they call themselves journalists, but in fact they form a specific opinion, this is propaganda.

    • @jakob8922
      @jakob8922 20 днів тому +1

      Usually when people use the word "propaganda" they are referring to something that is trying to trick the viewer into believing something. Propagandists don't typically give a clear message.

    • @user-fi9st4uk6m
      @user-fi9st4uk6m 19 днів тому +1

      The lack of braincells is quite evident with this one.

    • @Fractured_Unity
      @Fractured_Unity 19 днів тому +3

      The message is clear from the defense department and industry. Unlike Johnny Harris, Search Party basically never tells us their opinions and leaves the viewers to decide on the facts themselves. That’s called journalism.

  • @jblaze600
    @jblaze600 17 днів тому

    Great content!!

  • @whoknew124
    @whoknew124 15 днів тому

    Great content. Thanks. Cant wait for the Euro cup episode

  • @user-yh1nm1vy3i
    @user-yh1nm1vy3i 20 днів тому +36

    This country will do *anything* but give me healthcare 😢

    • @jamiemckenna1663
      @jamiemckenna1663 19 днів тому

      The US spends more money on healthcare than the military

    • @TheCrouchingZebra
      @TheCrouchingZebra 19 днів тому +3

      Just get a job looool it’s the responsibility of employers in this country

    • @Gunni1972
      @Gunni1972 18 днів тому +1

      @@TheCrouchingZebra NO, their responsability is to make Profits. It's The value of Money over the value ofpeople. Capitalism in a nutshell. Even before USA claimed to be it's sole Servant.

    • @TheCrouchingZebra
      @TheCrouchingZebra 18 днів тому +2

      @@Gunni1972 you want free healthcare but someone else to work for it… I get it.

    • @TheCrouchingZebra
      @TheCrouchingZebra 18 днів тому +1

      And by the way… there literally is free healthcare

  • @mmeade9402
    @mmeade9402 20 днів тому +21

    I see a lot of people complaining about this money not going towards infrastructure and schools etc etc
    Thowing money at problems isnt as effective in those fields as it is in the military typically. If they really need a new bomber, they can just print a few billion dollars and it gets done...
    If they however as an example need to replace the bridge to my south that they said needed replacing 30 years ago, they will spend 20 years in court debating whether its necessary, whether its going to be harmful to the weather, whether the slugs in that area are allergic to concrete etc etc etc
    Same goes for the schools. Its not a money problem. Ballou High School in Washington DC for example, in 2022-2023, the school had a chronic truancy rate of 88.5%, meaning 88.5% of the students missed at minimum 30% of the school year, minimum. Yet the schools graduation rate was 70%. How did 88.5% of the class get marked absent most of the school year and 70% of them still graduate?
    To fix stuff like that, money isnt going to help. The school isnt dilapidated and falling apart, and the students arent missing school to go to work the fields or the coal mines, you'd have to send in the national guard, confiscate peoples kids and put them in boarding schools, away from terrible parents and use state discipline. Good luck with that.

    • @historyandstuff16
      @historyandstuff16 20 днів тому +5

      We got so many shitty people who don’t want to take proper care of their kids these days. It’s really sad to see.

    • @almightysosa3007
      @almightysosa3007 20 днів тому +1

      Missing school for enough days will get child protective services called to the house and if they view the situation as unfit for a child they will take the child away. So yes that is the solution sadly, there’s consequences for a reason, when threatening them doesn’t work you have to enforce said consequences.

    • @grisellimay
      @grisellimay 20 днів тому

      This is such an uninformed view. Throwing money actually would help a lot of issues in this country from education to healthcare to infrastructure. Fun fact, infrastructure improvements can happen very quickly with money and political will but it doesn’t because those who benefit the most from it aren’t the ones making the decisions.

    • @mmeade9402
      @mmeade9402 19 днів тому

      @@almightysosa3007 Theoretically its supposed to work like that. But in reality that system doesnt function the way its supposed to
      The parents take no part in their education, and even when CPS shows up, the kids are out on the street doing whatever they're doing. Cant take the child away if the child isnt home.
      And somehow they still graduate high school, despite half of the adult American population reading at or below a 4th grade level.

    • @undefinedxx55
      @undefinedxx55 14 днів тому

      What you failed to mention is that Ballou High School is 98% black.

  • @yeetsalittle
    @yeetsalittle 19 днів тому +1

    Should do a deeper dive into how low- and high- frequency radars work, you've said multiple times in the video that it's about building an aircraft that can't be detected but thats not entirely true. Stealth aircraft can be detected by low-frequency search radars, but those don't have a high enough resolution to get a target lock on the aircraft. The B-21, like the F-35 or B-2, are still detectable by these low frequency radars, albeit at a much shorter range than non-stealth platforms

    • @arcataslacker
      @arcataslacker 17 днів тому

      Without vertical stabilizers to create resonance, it's very likely that the b2 & b21 may be just as difficult to detect with LF as they are HF.

  • @fatpen9731
    @fatpen9731 12 днів тому

    Top notch content right here, thank you for making these videos

  • @MZEz
    @MZEz 20 днів тому +82

    These mfs will do anything except providing infrastructure, health care and good public education

    • @fivetimesyo
      @fivetimesyo 20 днів тому +19

      Just one more car lane...

    • @Thisisntreal103
      @Thisisntreal103 20 днів тому +2

      Thing is they are capable of doing both this and health/ infra ect . They actually have the budget. They're just stuck in a self made either/or situation.

    • @worldofdoom995
      @worldofdoom995 20 днів тому +6

      We literally just passed a 400 billion infrastructure bill. We spend 1.5 trillion on health care every year

    • @xBigBean
      @xBigBean 20 днів тому +4

      Crazy thing is your country is wealthy enough to do both

    • @blorb32
      @blorb32 17 днів тому

      Je-....Nevermind.

  • @hylimm
    @hylimm 20 днів тому +7

    Deterrence? lol that’s more like threats!

    • @woehr6
      @woehr6 20 днів тому +4

      Best defence is a good offence

  • @StatusNull
    @StatusNull 20 днів тому

    9:59 Ha! finding targets you say. In that case pretty sure they would send half the fleet to indiscriminately bomb likely targets, while the other half is refueling re-arming going back home etc. a constant rotation of the fleet and barrage until we're met with an obstacle that stops that.

  • @dirkgoldman1155
    @dirkgoldman1155 День тому

    Sam Ellis is god tier when it comes down to map animations and map aesthetics. When people talk about the so called Vox or Johnny Harris map style then what they actually mean is this guy's work.

  • @oskrm
    @oskrm 20 днів тому +5

    4:00 "To defend itself", Bombers, especially stealth ones, are offensive weapons.

  • @SandyWolf-
    @SandyWolf- 20 днів тому +7

    What I want is to be civilized and beyond war!

    • @__idan__
      @__idan__ 20 днів тому +2

      Tell that to the other guy 😅

  • @bobtuda
    @bobtuda 3 дні тому

    This new $700 million stealth bomber plane should be given the nickname "Shohei Ohtani Bomber," who is the $700 million MLB player with the Los Angeles Dodgers--the largest 10-year contract ever received by any sports figure in world history. That's just a thought.

  • @gameboygamer6498
    @gameboygamer6498 13 днів тому +1

    "The B-21 is clearly inspired by the B-2" Probably because they were both made by Northrop Grumman? LOL

  • @ruftime
    @ruftime 20 днів тому +5

    The Cost over-runs alone will be 200B🙄

    • @IndigoSeirra
      @IndigoSeirra 20 днів тому +7

      The B-21 program is under budget, ahead of schedule, and on a fixed price contract.
      Literally the one military program that went well budget-wise and people still spout nonsense like this about it.

    • @proxy3386
      @proxy3386 19 днів тому +2

      also the 200B apparent immediate price tag is not an actual immediate price tag, and is basically the cost of the B-21 Program over its projected lifetime. That includes maintenance, training, weapons, replacement parts, etcetera…

    • @proxy3386
      @proxy3386 19 днів тому +2

      It is the same with the 1.5 Trillion*** dollar price tag with the F-35 Program. That is over its massive projected service lifespan (50+ years) which includes software updates, maintenance, training, and everything else…

  • @Alejandro.S.Rodriguez
    @Alejandro.S.Rodriguez 20 днів тому +4

    And that’s how war becomes a very profitable business to us companies.

  • @daffaalexander6300
    @daffaalexander6300 20 днів тому

    I love how you bridge to that ads 😂

  • @gabriellupisan7003
    @gabriellupisan7003 18 днів тому +1

    This vid came in clutch as I was about to eat dinner

  • @firehot427
    @firehot427 20 днів тому +8

    Imagine minding your own business and having an impenetrable air defense and the US considers that a national security risk

    • @diollinebranderson6553
      @diollinebranderson6553 20 днів тому +3

      Well thats how you stay in the lead🤷‍♂️. If you wanna easily win a 1 km race, train for 10km

    • @lachlanchester8142
      @lachlanchester8142 12 днів тому

      You clearly haven’t been minding your own business if you think you need impenetrable air defence

  • @Gwallacec2
    @Gwallacec2 20 днів тому +3

    Great, more useless posturing and military spending. God I’m so sick of this waste of money and time from our government.

    • @worldofdoom995
      @worldofdoom995 20 днів тому

      Useless? To who? Don't like it move to europe for your socialist paradise

  • @Stuffaboutstuff555
    @Stuffaboutstuff555 18 днів тому

    “Every time and every where” made me rock hard ❤

  • @rgandhi761
    @rgandhi761 19 днів тому

    I think when it comes to arms, the need is secondary and the possible outcome is top priority.

  • @agnosticbeliever138
    @agnosticbeliever138 20 днів тому +5

    If you don't understand how this video is an advertisement for the defense industry then it was made for people just like you, so that worked out.

    • @jamiemckenna1663
      @jamiemckenna1663 19 днів тому +4

      It's literally just explaining US air force doctrine to allow it to maintain its current position

  • @michaelpilos
    @michaelpilos 18 днів тому

    Good analysis.US is brilliant at being proactively strategic!

  • @TheoDcruz
    @TheoDcruz 18 днів тому +1

    I might be wrong but I think I'm hearing a heavy dose of Adobe Audio AI on this lol

  • @Todosthememe
    @Todosthememe 20 днів тому +4

    Saying that they are used for U.S. Defense distracts from the fact that we’ve never been in a defensive war. This is for world domination and control not defense

    • @daseinzigwahrem
      @daseinzigwahrem 20 днів тому

      Guess WHY you have never been in a defensive war. Everyone is afraid of the US striking back.

    • @diollinebranderson6553
      @diollinebranderson6553 20 днів тому +4

      Then you dont understand the art of war and lack foresight

    • @Todosthememe
      @Todosthememe 20 днів тому

      @@diollinebranderson6553 war is peace said Orwell

    • @Todosthememe
      @Todosthememe 20 днів тому

      @@diollinebranderson6553 world domination and control is defense Is your perspective

    • @Tonius126
      @Tonius126 20 днів тому

      ​​@@TodosthememeThis self flaggulation is disgsting and the definition of weakness. You know what they say, good times creats weak men and you're weak. I'm proud of our military and hegemony.

  • @udoyxyz
    @udoyxyz 20 днів тому +7

    isn't it $70 billion? $700 million each * 100 planes = $70 billion. You said $203 billion. If they buy 290 planes, then the math is correct. But they are buying 100.

    • @ZumokuYT
      @ZumokuYT 20 днів тому +5

      R and D costs added on

    • @TheDwightMamba
      @TheDwightMamba 20 днів тому +5

      Total cost of operating them for their lifespan. Imagine buying a bicycle and running it for 50 years. You are going to buy some tubes and chains.

    • @Dingusdoofus
      @Dingusdoofus 20 днів тому +1

      R&D and maintenance also contribute to the cost.

  • @notarehersal
    @notarehersal 13 днів тому

    Cool video and liking the Lahinch shirt too!

  • @Sacto1654
    @Sacto1654 20 днів тому

    I think production of the B-21 could be a lot larger than people think. We could see as many as 200 planes built because even with the B-52 modernization program, the B-52 is beginning to be vulnerable to a new generation of very long range air-to-air missiles that could attack a plane as far as 400 km (248 miles) away.

    • @oldmandoinghighkicksonlyin1368
      @oldmandoinghighkicksonlyin1368 20 днів тому

      That's why the next generation of stealth bomber is already being designed. These things take 15-20 years to go from concept to design to funding to development. There are also many phases and variants of the B21 Raider to incorporate new systems to deal with new threats as best as they can.
      For example, with the F35, they started being delivered about 10 years ago with the first block, but newer blocks of upgraded F35s are still being delivered. And the contract was won by Lockheed Martin in 2001. The concept and design phase was back in the early to mid 1990s.

  • @MKALTRA
    @MKALTRA 20 днів тому +3

    “A nation that continues year after year to spend more money on military defense than on programs of social uplift is approaching spiritual death.” - MLK

  • @ericmartin5720
    @ericmartin5720 20 днів тому +3

    It’s easy to waste other people’s money…..

  • @anothernumber9753
    @anothernumber9753 19 днів тому

    I think the distinction between a fighter and a bomber is becoming semantic. Both are becoming stealth aircraft predominantly both can fire from more than 100 miles from the target. Both can hit air or ground targets. Yes fighters are fast but if you plan well the speed is not the most important thing.

  • @bla9803
    @bla9803 11 днів тому

    I've always wondered about the economy of weapons. A lot of weapons are sold throughout the world, but what are the ingredients needed to make them ? Are these ingredients renewable or finite (like guano for agriculture) ?
    Thank you ! I love your video, and I am on a marathon t watch them all !

  • @JakeStevyson
    @JakeStevyson 20 днів тому

    Copa America is coming this summer as well and It will good discussion as well.
    Olympics might be hard due to some Cities aren't hosting anymore.

  • @niczim123
    @niczim123 15 днів тому +1

    9:09 Proof that yawning is contagious🥱

  • @nicwolf1370
    @nicwolf1370 13 днів тому

    Not only is the B-21 an absolute steal at that price, but the F-35 is fully cost-competitive with other, non-stealth tactical aircraft. US airo manufacturers are stepping up to the plate. I wonder if they'll export though?

  • @Geremy2Taps
    @Geremy2Taps 15 днів тому

    Let’s not forget how the 35s price per unit has dropped and is now the most produced and used gen5 fighter

  • @wildweasel3001
    @wildweasel3001 15 днів тому

    I never really thought about it but radar is a very defensive posture where as a stealth plane is somewhat threatening by nature

  • @jasongray797
    @jasongray797 19 днів тому

    It'll be the perfect weapon forever because since when has technology ever advanced or changed.

  • @Fred-eg9sx
    @Fred-eg9sx 9 днів тому

    The B52 is not just a bomber for undefended targets. The main purpose of a B52 is to launch extremely long range standoff missiles that can be launched far outside enemy air defences. The same goes for the B1 Lancer.

  • @BL_E_man
    @BL_E_man 4 дні тому

    @Johnny Harris, no one is perfect, and I truly appreciate you conscious and purposeful actions to deliver the information as is, with almost no opinion and when you have an opinion you approach it as a question we would all have in our minds thank you

  • @beatrizcascelli
    @beatrizcascelli 19 днів тому

    Great video, as usual!

  • @harryranford8397
    @harryranford8397 18 днів тому +1

    Saw a b2 flying over my house not stealthy definitely scary

  • @wildweasel3001
    @wildweasel3001 15 днів тому

    As a very determined person, i built my own stealth bomber in the shed. Good luck finding it 🎉

  • @derlxue
    @derlxue 20 днів тому

    Hi! Thanks for the excellent video! But could you volume up the host voice, pls

  • @travisbehnke8292
    @travisbehnke8292 18 днів тому

    Really like the content!

  • @jyy9624
    @jyy9624 20 днів тому +1

    Will they ever reveal if any Prez used them for the desired effect in preacetime

    • @oldmandoinghighkicksonlyin1368
      @oldmandoinghighkicksonlyin1368 20 днів тому

      Just recently some B-2s were deployed to Guam to make a show of force to China/North Korea in order to remind those countries not to upset the apple cart any further.
      It's pretty unlikely they'd ever use one in an offensive capacity and drop a bomb on anyone since the bomb's fragments have easily identifiable components that cand be traced back to the US.

  • @XerrolAvengerII
    @XerrolAvengerII 18 днів тому +1

    Thank you for the video :) I appreciate all the effort you put into the animations and graphics for the b-21 and you're editing and sound work was fantastic! This was the first Search Party video I've seen but I'm definitely going to subscribe if you are going to keep putting out this quality of content.

  • @mrsir6112
    @mrsir6112 20 днів тому

    Please please cover dci finals and why the blue devils are one of the most dominant dynasties in the history of of all sports