He has a wonderful way of opening up the wider faith. He is generous with his body of knowledge. What is so attractive about his teaching is as he describes. He puts you in touch with what is familiar.
'He sounds very ignorant'~~~~I am amazed! I have learnt so much since I left my Baptist church for 68 years. And Richard has not stopped opening my mind.
Richard Rohr has and is changing my life. Love this man. I been in church almost my whole adult life And it is as he says, all about rules and regulations... Thank u God for REAL TRANSFORMATION
Hi Sal, I love Fr. Richard Rohr! I am going to be talking about many of the same topics. Please do me a great kindness and subscribe to my channel UA-cam.com/JobyChrist... Thank you, thank you, thank you!
"For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine; but [wanting] to have their ears tickled, they will accumulate for themselves teachers in accordance to their own desires, and will turn away their ears from the truth and will turn aside to myths". 2 Timothy 4:3-4 "Therefore God gave them over in the lusts of their hearts to impurity, so that their bodies would be dishonored among them. For they exchanged the truth of God for a lie, and worshiped and served the creature rather than the Creator, who is blessed forever. Amen". Romans 1:24-25
I can't speak the whole truth, which I wish, about Richard Rohr, just as I can never speak the whole truth about God without becoming an idolater. Am I correct? Is this what he meant it to be as I understood him? Please reply.
I am learning much from Richards teaching. Did he exemplify dualistic thinking when he talked about the right? Wasn’t that a we are right and they are wrong position he expressed? Love and Peace, in Christ, Mike
Non-dualistic does not mean a wishy washy world without distinctions or perspectives. There is some irony in what he said about the right, but remember that Jesus, who is the perfect exemplar of nondualism, called the Pharisees hypocrites and a den of vipers. Not to ultimately condemn them but to free them from their limited, deluded perspectives.
Do you allow all views here? If so, consider that Jesus said false teachers would come...and not to follow them. Is Richard saying that Jesus was wrong for saying that? On what basis? Is this a wrong question? If so, why would you be so dualistic as to call me wrong? Thank you.
Can God be fully apprehended? Of course not, for all of us past present and future were are and will be but (using a metaphor) one small grey cell in the mind of God who fills the Universe. However thank God for Jesus Christ, who shows us the characten of God and who we are to follow. Not so much as to imitate, as to be by dying to our old ego self and allow Christ to rise in our most inner being. Please shed our trust in denominational dogmas, and seek the indwelling Christ in whom we have eternal life both now in the present and the new age to come.
To me it's very, very funny that we've taken to calling it ❝Vatican II❞, given that 1. There was never a "Council of Rome", ALTHOUGH - a. there was a Council of Constantinople (and Orthodox Christians refer to Constantinople as the "New Rome") - b. it was actually at Constantinople that they actually finalized what we mostly mistakenly call the "Nicene Creed" - c. no Pope of Rome has ever personally attended a single Ecumenical Council, excepting Jerusalem, prior to the 1054 schism. 2. It seems worded to make it sound like the Vatican itself has been rebooted, which according to Australian intellectual giant Hutton Gibson (and most scholars outside the Vatican II "conciliar think tank" - so even secular ones [indistinguishable as they are otherwise]) is of course precisely what happened!
Priests are human. In settings like this they seldom wear clerical garb. They are all priests and know they are all priests. Has nothing to do with being "ashamed", although considering the abuses that have been made in the name of clericalism, there would be good reason for shame.
It appears that the non-dual thinking has risks just like the other thinking. You can hold non-sense ideas just as well as good insights. The trinity thing appears to be a verbal sophistry. My guess is that this concept comes from the ancient Egyptian religion. A good example of non-dual thinking is that you can be and not be. When you look at your picture as a child, you see that you are that person in the picture, but you are also not that person in the picture.
Rohr’s doublespeak and web of tangled thought is very hard to follow unless you have taken the lure. Then he drags you wherever he, with his great knowing mystic mind wants to take you. You are the fish, he is the fisher. In order to do this the first thing he has to do is disavow identity, or the first premise of logic and reasoning A is A. He calls it dualistic thinking but it is really monistic for it must start with a thing is what it is. This of course leads to A not being Not A. That is not dualism. Rohr’s is dualistic thinking because the first thing it does is sets off the spiritual from the material, or the mind/body problem. In this dualism Rohr goes with the Beginning-less Mind and in doing so will eventual deny substitutionary atonement and that Jesus and the Christ are not the same thing, Jesus being the historical man and Christ the incarnation of God in all matter. How does he know all these things? It’s mystical and you can’t understand it unless you enter the mystical mind. Let go! Caught!
@@Wonks10000 Exactly! Rohr has to claim an evolutionary superiority since he is talking about things incomprehensible to us lesser mortals. Another example of his dualistic thinking. But neither Rohr nor you are going anywhere. (Mankind In Amnesia by Immanuel Velikovsky).
My stage of life has brought me to discover Rohr - I am grateful.
So well spoken, our world needs this message in 2022.
I love the simple brown robes...I have been changing from my old dualistic
Thinking.....I am so happy..
He is helping me to recover from a bereavement and his attitude is very positive and comforting. That is true.
Makes me happy that you found comfort
Thank you fr. Richard. You brought me closer to our lord Jesus and to the Father.
Bless you. Love you.
He has a wonderful way of opening up the wider faith. He is generous with his body of knowledge.
What is so attractive about his teaching is as he describes. He puts you in touch with what is familiar.
'He sounds very ignorant'~~~~I am amazed! I have learnt so much since I left my Baptist church for 68 years. And Richard has not stopped opening my mind.
Richard Rohr has and is changing my life. Love this man. I been in church almost my whole adult life
And it is as he says, all about rules and regulations... Thank u God for REAL TRANSFORMATION
Hi Sal, I love Fr. Richard Rohr! I am going to be talking about many of the same topics. Please do me a great kindness and subscribe to my channel UA-cam.com/JobyChrist... Thank you, thank you, thank you!
" we are threatened by otherness" Thank You Father
Very thought provoking.
I would like to hear more about Father Rohr his Word on U2 everyday how do I join,. I appreciate his message. It bgi es me hope,. M poje
Simply amazing. ❤️🙏🏼😘
Thanks much for posting this. Is it also possible to post or share the succeeding talks of Fr. Rohr in this conference?
To able to talk for 45-50 minutes, make sense, go deep...he is all meat in his teaching.
"For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine; but [wanting] to have their ears tickled, they will accumulate for themselves teachers in accordance to their own desires, and will turn away their ears from the truth and will turn aside to myths". 2 Timothy 4:3-4
"Therefore God gave them over in the lusts of their hearts to impurity, so that their bodies would be dishonored among them. For they exchanged the truth of God for a lie, and worshiped and served the creature rather than the Creator, who is blessed forever. Amen".
Romans 1:24-25
Wolf, not a shepherd
I can't speak the whole truth, which I wish, about Richard Rohr, just as I can never speak the whole truth about God without becoming an idolater. Am I correct? Is this what he meant it to be as I understood him? Please reply.
If this brother is helping you, all well and good, but don't forget the blood of Christ.
I am learning much from Richards teaching. Did he exemplify dualistic thinking when he talked about the right? Wasn’t that a we are right and they are wrong position he expressed? Love and Peace, in Christ, Mike
Non-dualistic does not mean a wishy washy world without distinctions or perspectives. There is some irony in what he said about the right, but remember that Jesus, who is the perfect exemplar of nondualism, called the Pharisees hypocrites and a den of vipers. Not to ultimately condemn them but to free them from their limited, deluded perspectives.
@@hoover728 Very well said Omega. Blessings and peace.
Been listening to him for years. It sounds funny the way he always says 'Jezuz' and 'Jejwit', and 'qweyzai' but I can look past that, lol.
Do you allow all views here? If so, consider that Jesus said false teachers would come...and not to follow them. Is Richard saying that Jesus was wrong for saying that? On what basis? Is this a wrong question? If so, why would you be so dualistic as to call me wrong? Thank you.
Why do you think he said "Jesus was wrong"?
Go away then
Can God be fully apprehended? Of course not, for all of us past present and future were are and will be but (using a metaphor) one small grey cell in the mind of God who fills the Universe. However thank God for Jesus Christ, who shows us the characten of God and who we are to follow. Not so much as to imitate, as to be by dying to our old ego self and allow Christ to rise in our most inner being. Please shed our trust in denominational dogmas, and seek the indwelling Christ in whom we have eternal life both now in the present and the new age to come.
@@henrieecen2938 you blaspheme God and exalt yourself
We worship God IN whom we move and have our being and worship God in spirit and in truth
To me it's very, very funny that we've taken to calling it ❝Vatican II❞, given that
1. There was never a "Council of Rome", ALTHOUGH
- a. there was a Council of Constantinople (and Orthodox Christians refer to Constantinople as the "New Rome")
- b. it was actually at Constantinople that they actually finalized what we mostly mistakenly call the "Nicene Creed"
- c. no Pope of Rome has ever personally attended a single Ecumenical Council, excepting Jerusalem, prior to the 1054 schism.
2. It seems worded to make it sound like the Vatican itself has been rebooted, which according to Australian intellectual giant Hutton Gibson (and most scholars outside the Vatican II "conciliar think tank" - so even secular ones [indistinguishable as they are otherwise]) is of course precisely what happened!
Can you give us the preach from Tomorrow?
Where is the priests Roman collar? Neither wears it. Why?
I believe he is a Munk and not a priest.
Uldis Dantche Not a real Priest that's why
Friar @@uldisdantche3633
Why are none of your clergy in your clerics? Is your priesthood not who you are?
Great question. Why is he ashamed of wearing clerical collar/clothes?!
Priests are human. In settings like this they seldom wear clerical garb. They are all priests and know they are all priests. Has nothing to do with being "ashamed", although considering the abuses that have been made in the name of clericalism, there would be good reason for shame.
@@johnriley5499 none of the priests that I know in any of the parishes that I go to wear secular clothing.
“Simple kindness.” Hear and practice it.
@@summersong2012 I'm simply asking a question
Where does the Holy Spirit come in this? No holy Spirit No Holy ????
STFU
It appears that the non-dual thinking has risks just like the other thinking. You can hold non-sense ideas just as well as good insights. The trinity thing appears to be a verbal sophistry. My guess is that this concept comes from the ancient Egyptian religion. A good example of non-dual thinking is that you can be and not be. When you look at your picture as a child, you see that you are that person in the picture, but you are also not that person in the picture.
A gathering of old priests still living in the past.
This is NOT the biblical, scriptural Gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ !!!!
He sounds very ignorant.
Pat Duffy
He sounds ignorant?!? You just revealed your deconstructive, deaf, little Self.
Rohr’s doublespeak and web of tangled thought is very hard to follow unless you have taken the lure. Then he drags you wherever he, with his great knowing mystic mind wants to take you. You are the fish, he is the fisher. In order to do this the first thing he has to do is disavow identity, or the first premise of logic and reasoning A is A. He calls it dualistic thinking but it is really monistic for it must start with a thing is what it is. This of course leads to A not being Not A. That is not dualism. Rohr’s is dualistic thinking because the first thing it does is sets off the spiritual from the material, or the mind/body problem. In this dualism Rohr goes with the Beginning-less Mind and in doing so will eventual deny substitutionary atonement and that Jesus and the Christ are not the same thing, Jesus being the historical man and Christ the incarnation of God in all matter. How does he know all these things? It’s mystical and you can’t understand it unless you enter the mystical mind. Let go! Caught!
@@Wonks10000 Exactly! Rohr has to claim an evolutionary superiority since he is talking about things incomprehensible to us lesser mortals. Another example of his dualistic thinking. But neither Rohr nor you are going anywhere. (Mankind In Amnesia by Immanuel Velikovsky).
Love you Richard!thank you father!
he's not your father , is he?
Heretical. AUSCP - read what they stand for. This lot needs God's mercy.