Mysterious Reason - Why New Russian T-14 Armata Pulled from Ukraine
Вставка
- Опубліковано 3 вер 2023
- In April 2023, the T-14 Armata tank was introduced to the Ukraine battlefield, making its involvement in the conflict brief. A video showing one of these armored vehicles firing at Ukrainian positions then circulated in May, marking the first known operation of the T-14 during the invasion. However, now the society is surprised with the news that the fleet of T-14 Armata tanks from Russia has supposedly been taken away from the frontlines of the invasion in Ukraine. This event certainly raises a pertinent question: what might be the underlying reasons for the Armata being withdrawn from the Ukraine battlefield? And here, this channel has summed it for you.
Subscribe Now :
/ @military-tv - Наука та технологія
T14 was never in the frontlines, confirmed by multiple russian guys fighting in the front. It made to some training ground etc were it was tested etc in training. Russians also said that due to current developments of war T14 will need modernization for better protection against drone technologies etc.
Lastly t14 makes absolutely no sense. The soldiers are not familiar with it, the repair teams are not familiar with it, there is no logistics behind it. It makes no sense why russians would send it to the front just to show of, specially when they dont have it in big numbers. This tank will take years to fully implement in the army.
T90MS are very capable tanks and the crew, repair teams are very familiar with it. They can easly repair it on the field, they have shit ton of spare parts and a massive soviet left logistics behind it that can produce butt ton of those tanks. If anything biggest factor in war is logistics and numbers. Some wonder weapon wont change anything. History has proven that in war numbers, logistics and production capability is the biggest factor. As much as armata is glorified by russians, they would have 10 t90ms any day over 1 armata . Same way ukrainians would take 10 t72 any day over 1 leopard 2. Its just simple. Numbers win wars.
speaking nun but facts
The T-14 was originally supposed to have a 30mm autocannon, mainly to combat aerial threats. Maybe they're revisiting those early designs.
@@JAnx01no thats a completely different varient. Its called t-15 heavy IFV. It can get 30 mm or 50 mm cannon. Or Kurganets 25, which is a lighter version of t-15
While i agree on the t14 and t90 (and especially with the supposed modular anti drone upgrade in the t90) i would dissagree in terms of its varients. Specifically talking about the Boomerang and Kurganets, or even t15. Current wheeled and tracked IFVs are not up to par. If they put them into production it would be a leap in power and saving lives.
@@walkinondamoon1 No. I'm talking about the T-14, not the IFV.
Development of modern armoured vehicles normally takes decades. There are doubts about the capability of the T14 engine and also the fire control system. With an unmanned turret the fire control system needs to be absolutly top notch.
It shouldn’t because it is an upgraded T90, which was an upgraded T80, which was an upgraded T72 which was an upgraded T64….. t55/54… T10.
The T14 engine is based in parts of the Tiger-engine from WW2! But the reliability is very doubtfull. It doesn‘t work without mechanics around them all the time. And this for a lot of the other systemes of the tanc. The T14 is a good reflection of russias efforts to make it wrong. Their incapability to create modern arms.
@@raven0666 what also amazes me about the Russian engines is the fact their reverse speed is dangerously slow and the fact that when the push the throttle they can be spotted from 1,5km away.
But the again, Russian doctrine is not about preserving life, its massive artillery bombartment followed by massive armor.
And if that doesn’t work its human waves continuously.
@@robertcras8151All Wrong... please, Study before.
@@robertcras8151You must be really naive...
The T-14 isn't on the front-lines for a simple reason: the benefits of having that tank's capabilities at the front _DON'T_ outweigh the PR-downside when this tank gets destroyed... which it will. Not because it's junk -- _though it might well BE junk, I honestly don't know_ -- but because *any* military vehicle at the front line is going to be destroyed. The different is that the loss of a T90 isn't a PR-disaster for Russia who relies heavily on a bogus reputation for being a world-class military -- _which they're absolutely not._
Russia has kicked more ass than any existing country in the world. They fought singlehandedly practically everybody who is anybody. Mongols, Napoleon, Ottoman Turks like 14 times, whole of the Entente, Japs, Hitler and now the whole of the NATO and won overwhelmingly in vast majority of those conflicts. If that doesn't meet your standards, maybe the problem is you, not the Russians.🤔
@@vladimirjokanovic6462 Sure dude, sure.
@@TROOPERfarcry HUA 👋
That’s why Afghans handed them orcs a new ass
The Challenger and Leapord both say -Hold my Beer
The last time I read about the T-14 being in Ukraine, it was mainly used as Mobile Artillery and most likely somewhere in the Luhansk region.
Snitch spoils of war
@@louisaguirre6724 and whatcha gonna do about it, tell your mom?
@@evilfingers4302 yes zir just did told me to get the fuck out her basement already
It hasn't been in Ukraine
@@crusader_wolf1104 yes it was in Ukraine, do a search and you'll find it.
I don’t think the T14 ever was at the frontline
There is no evidence that the T-14 was in Ukraine. And it wouldn't make sense anyway. T-14 is just as weak against mines and Arillery as any other tank.
It's already mentioned in the video that it was never in a direct engagement...
The video is all over the place. It sais it was deployed in Ukrain agains Ukrainian defensive positions. But then it wasn't used in active fighting. Then its mentioned that it was deployed in Kiev... (2:15) No need to argue here. The video seems to be confused. @@erenyeager3380
Nothing is true, everything is permitted.
You all believe every other thing Russia says. Why not believe Russia when it says the T14 was on the frontline? I know why💡. It’s because Russia had to pull it out of battle early, due to poor performance. 😂😂😂
T14 was never in the frontline - The picture Russia released were taken at a training establishment
The T14 is a Unicorn
Perhaps the mix and match approach: Modernized T-64/T-72/T-80/T-90 fighting along side the T-14.
They don’t need the Armata, the T-90 is more than enough
If you want to win a war: you need your best equipment at war...we can see the result of no hi-tech equipement on the front. This is why Russia is loosing the war...
That’s true, difficult to operate close air support with all those turrets flying past the cockpits…
😂 😂, yea more than enough to incinerate it’s crew. russian equipment is laughable, don’t believe me, look at India switching over to French aircraft. Even China stopped copying Russian designs
@@Reticulosis China Stopped Copying Russian Designs because they only needed to become self sufficient.
Besides that Russia Refused to Sell China any more modern equipment for them to copy again. There is no real reliability problem other then the Partners receiving the equipment.
India never made good ideas when it came down to defense, they lack education on equipment capabilities, is why they tried Replacing the T-90S with Arjun tank which failed horribly. India Uses both Russian and Western Equipment so them buying French Stuff doesn't change their already large SU-30MKI fleet. O and they love buying Russian Cruise Missiles, I love how you didn't mention the munitions part since that is also apart of equipment
@@Reticulosiswe already see how well nato equipment works😂
I’m pretty sure it’s because it wasn’t developed with top attack protection. No one realized how effective top attack weapons would be until the war already started
Only a fool would leave a prized weapon to enemies' hands, like might as well give the keys to their kingdom
He's talking about the likes of the captured Leopard 2A6 which is also now being negotiated be traded to Iran for re-inverse engineering. It only shows that they either have no confidence with the T14 or they don't want to reveal whether its really working or not. The same thing as like the British Challenger 2 and the M1Abrams.
Moscow is already displaying captured vehicles in their museum and how much they have tested the captured vehicles is the real question.
Yet, tank to tank battles are hardly being seen. The tanks were basically taken out by either Russian Mines, Attack helicopters, Drones or Artillery. The same happened to Russian Tanks.
The only difference between Russia and Ukraine is Russia is using it's own money to fund the war, but Ukraine is borrowing Money to fund a war - It also means the debtors would expect interest payment: just google search on how long it took the UK to pay back the debt of World War II then calculate whether the Ukrainian economy will even need to service those debts.
No mystery, it's not ready for operational use yet. It can be used only for indirect fire, because engine can stop anytime.
Same reason why Challenger tanks are not on the frontline atm, not to burn them for nothing until an operational breakthrough is achieved.
Nope, that's changed. Challenger has been getting a lot of praise from UKR forces.
The Challengers have been used to get past the first Russian defensive line. They are past Robotyne now and are facing the second line.
The just lost one challenger, so there goes this argument….
@@robertcras8151 And all crew members survived. It's getting the job done by all accounts.
didn't realize Ukrainians are that desperate, they committed last reserves and Challengers into the grind without achieving operational breakthrough yet. oh well...
Possibly they don’t want the T-14 to come up against a 50 year old tank (Abrams) and get its ass kicked. That wouldn’t help sales.
It's irrelevant. Everyone understands that they're both perfectly capable of destroying one another.
@@JAnx01By that logic, the T14 itself is irrelevant
@@Jkim890 By that logic, every piece of military equipment ever is irrelevant.
@@JAnx01 Yes. That’s why your logic is beyond basic.
Is that why the US is scared to send the Abrams to Ukraine? Takes 1 Rooskie mobik to destroy that thing like they have with Leopards and now Challenger 2s. That wouldn't help sales LAMO
What better way to test a tank than in battle.
Because they don't want to exposed this
They had to pull them they couldnt get the turret to stop spining.
Welp armata got out easy, I guess unfortunately we were not going to see armata getting destroyed by Himars anytime soon. Although if that time coming I will really enjoy watching it
Lots of good tanks probably > few excellent tanks.
Issue is the t14 aint both
Good tank gets blown up just as easily by a cardboard and plastic drone as a bad tank does. But limited supply, very expensive and longer harder to produce, and still all of "nato" to possibly fight. Need to hold something back like an ace up your sleeve. Also tank crews got real world training and can now go back and instruct and teach tactics. @@valgo8128
@@valgo8128 we aren't even sure lol people keep assuming the Russians keep fucking around when in reality the western supported Ukraine is getting mauled by the so called defeated Russia
Developing tanks field. We can see Leopard burnning like hell…
They dont want to deply both at same time.
Remember the first batch of Pz V Panther sent to battle during july 1943 ... A good lesson !
They don't need expensive weapon here. Su 57 is also out of battle. This is economic war and war of massive huge cheap amount of artillery and drones. 10 old tanks better than one modern in battlefield
Facts but these COD players can't understand that.
SU-57 Was never in the battle .... even China and India are refusing them as they so poor and outdated !
Pulled from Ukraine? Lmfao it never even went to the front
Those are not production models. They are just for testing its capability and operational efficiency in various battle conditions. They have have now all the information they need so I think upgrades will be develop and installed then another battlefield testing will be made before mass production. That would be interesting to watch. This will be the first tank in the 21st century that prototypes are tested first in actual battle before production.
true just like su57 12 prototypes.
Pfff, like Toyota never calls back cars of certain models to fix something.
Of course it was tested in combat and of course there were bugs found.
Normal process for a new model.
братан, армата Т14 была развернута для отработки управления огнем, маневренности на местности и т. д. также она находилась за линией фронта и ни в каких прямых операциях не принимала участия
3:30 hallelujah contact with a parallel universe
Perhaps stalling and being unable to be towed in the Moscow Parade has dented confidence. Why did you not include this tidbit?
that seems to have been just the driver pulling the brake, the tow vehicle wasn't able to move it at first and a few minutes later it left on its own... probably even more embarrassing, than if it actually broke down, but it wasn't a technical issue
Moscow started getting attacked so Russia probably moved their two t14's to mother Russia.
You love your Russian stories. Makes me wonder who's side you're on.
First they have to produce them... a few prototypes isn't exactly mass production. 😀
how can the video be of a T 14 firing, there's a guy in the turret!
"It's possible that the abilities of the T-14 have been overstated." When have the Russians/Soviets ever NOT overstated the capabilities of their weapons systems?
in 2018 ... when Putin announced the hypersonic missiles !
What you mean like the over stated leapords in Ukraine?
Or the over stated hymars in Ukraine?
Or the over stated Bradley’s IVFs?
Shall we go on?
Soviets were the real deal unlike present day Russia.. They did put their money where their mouth was.. Soviets didn't mess around
@@bulllea 😂😂😂
@@HoLeeChit11 Let´s make som clearification... Ukraine received 71 Leopard 2 tanks (Leopard 2 comes in MANY versions)... now, at some point I read someone say that if they had to choose between 10 Leopard 2´s and 15 T-90´s they would choose the Leopards. That they are better doesn´t mean they are invincible. A 2000 $ drone can if hit right take out or stop a tank, from both sides. This war is more complicated than just numbers or quality... if it was for the numbers, Russia would have conquered Ukraine far back.
The Himars again are not over stated... they fill a very important role, and keep Russia on it´s toes... add to that the fact that the Himars given to Ukraine are with limited range.
Get real!!!! The reason the T14 has been withdrawn is two fold - one, it isn't needed, the T80 and T90 are more than a match for the Challenger, Abrahams and the ex Soviet tanks for Ukraine. No need to throw the very latest tank into the battle. Secondly, there is no way in hell Russia is going to risk letting a T14 (for what ever reason) fall into HATO hands. HATO is still scrabbling to catch-up with the T14 so no reason to give them the latest and best tank in the world to pull apart! Unbelievable just how brainwashed people are about the superiority of Western armament and the inferiority of Russian gear. Just listen to the Ukies - they are begging the West to find and supply ex Soviet tanks, BMP's etc. Open your minds little people.
Its a piece of incapable junk , THATS why no-one will see it on a battlefield ! Russia have even cancelled production.. " best tank in the world" 😂🤣 BAHAHAAHAH What`s it like living in fairy dust ?
Indian FRCV 1800 Robotic T-14 Armata Tank Project best Option Joint Partnership By Make in indian Development
Probably they suffer from flying turret syndrome.
I'm pretty sure when you pull armoured vehicles from frontlines it's for a brute hit with everything from a different direction, like Omaha when the troops got past they moved the armoured vehicles up and AROUND the beach in certain situations dont quote me on it though
or ,aby they realised its not as equipped as they thought and there doing it to try and save the little vehichles they have 💀
No because if it’s destroyed it will be posted everywhere and russian morale will go down dramatically their indestructible tank that they have very little of gets obliterated
Excellent explanation!
The T-14 stealth tank - no one's ever seen one in combat. Another hunk of junk, second rate armor and the engine is reverse engineered off the same engine used by German Tiger tanks in WWII.
I would think you would want to use up oldest first.But I am sure Russia has plenty T-90s to spare anyway.
Not after a year of fighting, why else get the T55/54/10 to the front….
@@robertcras8151why not. It will waste ukrainian artillery. There’s a video on telegram of an old t55 that was packed with c4. A few curious Ukrainians got too close and BOOM. They have also driven some remotely and exploded them killing a few Ukrainians. There’s maybe one video on UA-cam.
no its a case of send it the strongest first so they cant hunker down and trying to preserve life
@@samurai778 after 2 years of war and being hammered so bad, the Russian statement of being the strongest means you have a few months experience.
I think Wagner send the least experienced (criminals) first...
@@robertcras8151 loll
Brother, can t14 will face Abrams or Leclerc?
With modern ammo, anything can destroy anything.
@@JAnx01Then what’s the point of the T14 in the first place?
@@Jkim890 It's a modern tank.
@@JAnx01 So why make it if the T-80 or T-90 is just as modern?
@@Jkim890 crew survivability, when penetrated t80, t90 , it just impossible to survive because of auto reload under turret , russia can just copy Abram design and move on
Just like the SU57 - crap
Russia's primary, and longstanding, weakness is chronic lack of organization. The best weapons mean nothing if the organization is dysfunctional. The best weapons mean nothing if the soldiers have no psychological or propaganda training to know what they are fighting against.
Long before this war, Putin should have ordered the implementation and extensive training in large scale Incident Command System training. It is abundantly clear that the Russian Army and Navy have no clear command, communications, and control systems. ICS is good for natural disaster response and could be better than what Russia has right now. ICS is normally a temporary authority and action structure but, I'd think it could be made permanent for military forces.
Russian arms sales have collapsed. Their best chance for future sales is the T-14 and SU-57. Lose them in battle against Western kit and it's goodbye to those sales.
It’s a t70 with a fake turret
Why would they send their new tank to fight in Ukraine? It has only disadvantages. The T-14 is almost (if not exactly) as vulnerable to man portable anti tank systems, drones, mines and artillery as all other tanks. When they blow up (not if, when) it's bad publicity. There is nothing to be gained by sending those to their grave without accomplishing anything.
btw, the same is true for Leopards or Abrams. They were not designed for this type of conflict.
Ohhh they were designed for just that.
War in euroe
The T-72 has a much tougher cast turret that can provide protection against light mortars and drone dropped ordnance, even some cluster artillery ammunition. The T-14's thin sheet metal turret filled with electronics would fair much worse in such an environment.
I'm not saying it's a bad AFV, they all come with their own compromises. Just not the right tool for the type of warfare with the amount of artillery being fired and the lack of drone countermeasures deployment.
Let's look at the situation from a different angle.
Great Britain, realizing that the conflict develops into a new round of deaths in Ukraine, supplies it with weapons with a range sufficient to strike Moscow, realizing that in this case Russia will launch a nuclear strike on Ukraine. In other words, the UK deliberately doomed Ukraine to death.
Isn't it clear that in the year of war, weapons cause even more deaths than before. These are obvious things.
If you want peace, then bring ambassadors and persuade them to meet with negotiations, and do not bring weapons, in response to the use of which Russia will cause an even greater defeat.
And tomorrow Russia will announce that Britain or the United States with the supply of long-range weapons endangers the security of Russia and strikes at Britain itself! Nuclear weapons! And it will be right!
Such deliveries are unacceptable to anyone! It is one thing to carry cartridges with machine guns for local battles, and another thing to carry missiles with a range of up to Moscow. This will lead the world to nuclear war!
click bait. it's not mysterious.
Кто вышел где и когда ?😂 Ничего не знаете и не узнаете, увидите русские войска в Киеве, остальное вам знать не нужно.
they were just brought in ukraine for just testing about what ways you can employ it and effectivness like acting like artillary,
Sure kid. If it fails, just claim it to be a test.
T14 are conserved for any conflict with NATO. They tested it in Ukraine but dont wanna waste it.
If you want to win a war: you need your best equipment at war...we can see the result of no hi-tech equipement on the front. This is why Russia is loosing the war...
They only want to waste their young fighting men. Grow up & use your brain!
yeah, they rather wasted 4000+ T-72, T-80 and T90 tanks... so why waste T-14?
@@PjotrII hallelujah contact with a parallel universe
@@fred6319 Not really, you see I am not Russian, living under Russian propaganda, so I live in this world and universe! How about you?
Fleet?😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
1. If it was a bad tank, then they would make more than 10 pieces. Typically, tank projects are made by 1 or 2 tanks, and after testing and waiting for the customer, they look for faults, fix them, and if the army is satisfied with this, they launch them into series. 2. The author is trying, with all his thoughts, to put in the information that this is a bad tank, since it is not used in Ukraine, but as we know NATO is the enemy and Russia needs technology and knowledge about the tank to leak to the enemy, let it be a surprise for idiots . 3. Recently, Challenger 2 with the Kornet ATGM was destroyed. How much has Russia already spent time on NATO equipment to study its weaknesses and strengths? It’s all very simple, why they didn’t give Abrams 2 to the Ukrainians, but gave them Abrams 1, they are afraid of technology leakage and subsequently reputation and sales.
Cause its junk.Everyone of them in there military parade broke down and were towed away.Look up the footages.
As if it was ever used 😂
Russia did not send armata in the front lines, only the Western medias said that..
No there were a few telegrams that were pro russian said that they were used in combat and even a few videos of one firing at something ( but we couldnt see what it was firing at or geolocate it )
Why use hi-tech tanks when you can whip an inferior opponent with old equipment? Makes sense to me.
If you want to win a war: you need your best equipment at war...we can see the result of no hi-tech equipement on the front. This is why Russia is loosing the war...
That old equipment has been getting obliterated every single day en masse. So far, Russia is down 1968 tanks.
@@ImBigFloppa hallelujah contact with a parallel universe
@@fred6319 Look up Warspotting on Google. It's a pretty nifty database. I don't know about you, but personally I'm more of a fan of objective visually confirmed losses instead of wildly overinflated claims from either government
@@ImBigFloppaAn expensive tank getting hit by the same ordnance that Russian tanks have been pounded by (Javelin, TOW-2B, Stugna-P), wouldn't have fared any better. So your argument doesn't fly.
None of them have any top armor to withstand top attacks from anything and only a few tiny spots that can withstand direct hits from powerful RHA >1000 mm capable warheads such as the Stugna-P.
Because T14 Armata is just papertiger, nothing new. Just old shit at different form
It’s unknown to me why the designers tasked with implementing an engine for the T-14, chose an offbrand design of Porsche’s Type 203 engine that was intended for Porsche’s proposal for their Tiger.
T-14 is an interesting weapon, but it needs some serious work. Genuinely would be more afraid of the T-90M’s that are currently confirmed fighting in Ukraine.
Russias keeping its powder dry for now i suspect
Maybe the batteries keep falling out.
Way to say nothing.
лож не участвовал он в войне скиньте видео.
Thr
Because they don't want them to burn like leopards and challengers
Just anothe rrussian wapons platform , that sucked when it had to perform !!!
Blind
It’s not a mystery. T14 can’t be deployed in useful numbers, kind of like sending 10 Abrams to the front. The propaganda loss isn’t worth the potential military gain. I still haven’t seen evidence of the British Challenger doing anything on the front lines. They might be there, but the British have surely been skittish about their tank showing up on tv screens and computer monitors around the world either as smoking hulls or as trophy’s on display in Moscow. So it’s rich to hear that they’re so critical of the T14s lack of combat deployment
There is something just not right with the design of the turret. It looks to tall an squared. Easier target to hit maybe. But, something not right with that look.
IThe T-14's turret only consists of the gun with a thin sheet metal that houses electronics, smoke launchers, an APS and protects them from small arms fire and....rain. It's a deliberate design decision. "Something is not right" is not the most articulate take on it.
It was pulled because parade floats suck in battle.
my guess is they will use it at the very end of the war, when they have built up a sufficient number of them and its been tested enough.
it would be a pr disaster if they threw them into battle now haphazardly and they got destroyed (which they would, no matter how new or good a tank is its not invulnerable).
but if they use them at the very end of the war when ukraine is pretty much already beaten and does not have much to counter with it can be a huge pr victory. imagine 100 t-14 armata tanks rolling through the streets of kiev.
also as someone already mentioned, t-90m does the job just fine.
So at that point it’s literally a propaganda piece and hardly contributed to the war at all.
yes but propaganda can be more important for the war than actual combat sometimes@@Jkim890
First Challenger 2 was knocked out yesterday lol
I love the video always but you could have made this one real short just like a lot of their equipment why did take it off cuz just like a lot of their new stuff it's a big pile of s**t and they don't want to blow any more money that they don't have & make.em look even worse.....😂!!!!!! Facts.... Thanks for all the content......💯
1st class US indoctrination certificate holder
Why risk their most advanced Tank tech being captured, while they can destroy enemy tanks with drones 1% of the price 🤔
In my personal opinion, Tanks in general are obsolete machines in wars, against manpads, drones and helicopters ...
The worst place I could be in a war, is to be in a Tank as its an easy target for 2023 wars
And it´s junk.
Yeah, with drones, helicopters or bazookas you can offensives? Lol sounds stupid. And doesn't work like that.
Tank protects infantery and make easier the offensives in the battlefield.
Yeah, that's why we don't see Challenger or Abram tanks so far.
@@HallMarkHM Non of the sent Leopards & Challengers made it to the border in their " Offensive " !
Because they were destroyed from 15km away by Ka 52 Helicopters & cheap iranian drones
@@omaral-maitah181In any vehicle is normal, tanks are unique because protects the infantery and guarantize the terrain ofensives. And Aircraft, helicopter or an airplane for example can't make that, they proposite is support the advance of the offensive.
This channel is loosing the credibility fast by misrepresenting facts.
Don’t they engine issues?
Waste of my time again.😑
I bet t-14 will be a jack in the box too!!!
Please make video new russian bomber named "PAK DA"
Xaxaxaxxa който е зглобявал видеото не е много умен ! 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Why the “best army in the world” Abram still don’t even dare to come out and fight like its buddies Leopards and Challengers ????
Who said that the US Army was the "best in the World"?
I mean, they have the biggest number of soldiers but, compared with their European allies, I would say that they are about the same - just saying.
Also, the Leopard 2 and Challenger 2 seem to be perfectly adequate, so why bother sending Abrams,?
And finally, the M1 uses completely different fuel from the Challenger and Leopard so, from a logistics point of view, it would be difficult to integrate them into the Ukrainian Army...
didn't age well mate, did it?
This war proved that fancy expensive tanks are completely pointless in a full scale modern war. T-72M is unironically the best tank for this war.
They SUCK !!!!!!!!!!
Russia is worried about future sales but NO ONE will ever buy Russian "Junk' Now !!! 😆
Sgt, Semper Fi 💙💛
The T-14 has too small a caliber to fight Abrams.
It has a bigger gun
125mm T-14 cannon vs 120mm on Abrams.
@@TheSwearingChef or ... 152 ...
first !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
The T-14 was pulled because they forgot to add the wooden log.
What crap this is. It was an experimental tank, and Russia don’t need tanks as they have an abundance of Drones.
I heard Armata was sent to Ukraine to be tested in real situations,and now it will be improved.Armata does not exist,I think,in great numbers yet,besides other,older tank models are to be used first,and Russia has about 10,000 of them,or so.
Chaotic and exhausted lol its call the Fabian strategy & with 400k Uke KIA its working
Not even the Kremlin's propaganda numbers are half of that. Does making up random numbers help you vatniks sleep at night?
They are saving the T-14 for Poland and Nato.
We all know the motive... Russian quality!😂😂😂
It's no mystery, T-14 is a failure..
Like everything russia makes.
@@zorakzoran1 haha, look at AK-47 = Best rifle
Any evidence that it's a failure...no ...then it's settled it's neither a success nor a failure
@@zorakzoran1This take is so dumb. Seriously, how deep have you sunk into media propaganda that logic has fled your brain? Even North Korea the most sanctioned nation could launch ballistic missiles across Japan now think what other resource-rich nations can do
@@raceman7229 Yes it is the best weapon if you don't want to hit anything.
I think that the reason could be the NATO forces don't need this much advanced weaponry to die 😂😂😂
Way too many laughing faces, dufus! Not even witty 💩💩💩
100 pre production. 132 state contract 2023 in various model configuration. It seems to me 1st tank guards army is now equipped with the deadliest fighting force ever assembled since ww2. I wonder how that will work out for bandara and his buddies.
Russia has between 100.000-200.000 tanks....Lol
Put Chicken wire on top. - Safe as houses. NOT!
😂🤣
Because the T14 is trash
i didn't think this tank where sent to Ukraine Russian will never do that
I think any tank is out if date before it is built. Modern warfare favors drone surveilance and destruction from stand off distances. That means these tanks need to get bigger guns and guided shells and become artillery.
What you're asking for already exists, but is not tanks. It's mobile mortars. See Nona-S.