How Chip 'n Dale MASTERED Cameos Correctly...
Вставка
- Опубліковано 3 чер 2022
- Uploads every Saturday and Wednesday, don't miss out: bit.ly/2OxDh1w
LINKTREE: linktr.ee/dazzreviews
So Chip 'n Dale is a movie that came out, and I was blown away by its world building! And while I'm a tad late to the party, I gotta talk about the unique way this movie did it's cameos. While this has become a bit of a trending to cram in crossovers for the sake of eyecandy, we've seen a lot more noticable failures that Chip 'n Dale has arguably avoided. So let's talk about what makes an reference filled easter egg background fodder work well. We've seen it in Wreck-It Ralph, Ready Player One, Space Jam 2, Who Framed Roger Rabbit and The Lego Movie. But it's time for a new spin. This is my I guess video essay on Chip 'n Dale, and how they MASTERED the background cameo appearance.
#dazzreviews #chipndale #disney #eastereggs #videoessay #analysis #disneychipndale #review #uglysonic #chipndalerescuerangers
MORE VIDEOS:
The TERRIBLE Turbo Movie...: • The TERRIBLE Turbo Mov...
Overwatch's GREATEST Cutscene: • Overwatch's GREATEST C...
The TERRIBLE Spongebob Movie 3: • The TERRIBLE Spongebob...
The Disney CG That Won An Oscar..: • The Disney CG SHORT Th...
The Cinematic That REDEFINIED Sonic: • This Cinematic REDEFIN...
The CG SHORT That Impressed Pixar...: • The CG SHORT That Impr...
The Scene That Changed Turning Red...: • The Scene That Changed...
DazzReviews2:
They Turned Cars 2 Into a Wii Game??: • They Turned CARS 2 Int...
They Turned Mickey Mouse Into a BRUTAL Wii Game: • They Turned MICKEY MOU...
LINKS:
DazzReviews2: / dazzletsplays
Twitch: / dazzreviews
TikTok: / dazzreviews1
Twitter: / dazzvideos
Instagram: / dazzreviews
Discord: / discord
DazzReviews Clips: / @dazzreviews3283
DazzReviews Archive: / @dazzreviews4-archive399
...Why do I want an Ugly Sonic cut? What's wrong with me? - Фільми й анімація
I'm impressed they managed to have Disney, DreamWorks, Nickelodeon and more companies together in a movie as cameos
I’m honestly still not over that. I keep wondering how they got the rights for all that
@@FisherBros Could it be that Disney secretly owns the rights to everything
No one’s brave enough to file lawsuit probably
Imagine if we get Doctor Doofenshmirtz say " Curse you , Dinkleberg !! " in the sequel. If there is a sequel.
@@_____________a_a plus, free publicity right? I didn't even know about Nick Jr's Paw Patrol until this movie 🤣😅
I honestly liked Ugly Sonic in this movie, wasn't expecting that
They made him cuter imo
Found it interesting on how some that didn't like him for the Sonic movie, and now they like him.
Also the fact that he was given another chance and a new background.
Same
@@roxassora2706 sus
@@YllidTheLoonyDog Do you know what that means?
"I'm a terribly cynical person most of the time, but I still really liked this movie. It's not perfect, but it was pretty different, which in this day and age, is great to see.
" - Shrek
If this movie wasn’t good it would have been all ogre for Disney
Did he ACTUALY say that?
Where did Shrek say this? 😂
@@maryrosekrouse4089 ''yes.''-sponge bob
@@user-hq4bj8fy2b Ah, I see
The fake 2D killed me. Some of the background characters looked hand drawn and they looked way better than the main characters and their weird 3D cell shaded thing. I think that would have pushed this film from being “pretty ok” to “pretty good” in my book.
I wouldn't mind it so much if the film didn't insist it was "2d" and lie to us as such. Other characters were 2D animated and overall it was just weird insisting it's one thing where we knew it was another. Really took me out of it.
God same. The fake 2D is the only reason I haven't watched it yet. It's so painful to look at and just reminds me of how ruthlessly Disney axed their 2D department :/
It would have been funny if Dale started the steps of the cgi transformation process but decided against it half way through.
That would explain why he still looks 3d
I think they went with cell shade because it has the look and feel of rotoscope. If they went with traditional rotoscope it would of looked too obvious.
@@alchemistofsteel8099 Yeah they could easily have used it to make a dig at people who get cosmetic surgery over and over. Dale says, "Hey you can't make fun of my CGI. You've had work done too." And Chip replies, "Yes, but some of us know when to stop."
What I want to know is how we got two DreamWorks characters in this, but no Pixar characters aside from live action cars with _Cars_ movie eyes. That feels like a massive oversite and missed opportunity.
The characters are supposed to be the classic ones from decades ago, and Pixar ones are recent, what’s the point in giving homage that came out a decade ago
@@MasterKey2004 pixar movies have also been out for decades
how did they get Blaster a Hasbro character and one of Optimus Prime's legs in there? and why blaster of all characters?
@@MasterKey2004 but dreamworks released their first movie (antz) in 1998, while pixar released their first movie (toy story) in 1995, so that argument makes no sense
If I remember correctly, there’s this storyboard that’s been released over this past few days that when Chip and Dale were talking to Jar Jar Binks, (which is now Ugly Sonic), there was a part in which they ran under this table where Mike Wazowski and Sully from Monsters Inc where also taking autographs, (later replaced by He-Man and Skeletor).
What I loved most about this film is just the overall idea of the coexistence. The animated characters existing alongside humans is just a natural part of life. We see animated children going to school with live action children, animated characters in positions of power, and so on, in addition to the comic conventions.
Yeah, honestly it makes me really want a much more mature version of this movie just showing all the nuances of how life in this world actually goes, from the funny to the political to the downright horrific
@@Marshall.R Same. Like really expanding on the same ideas that Who Framed Roger Rabbit set up.
@@Marshall.R The fact that in this movie's universe you can go to the bakery and suddenly One Winged Angel blasts in your ears and when you look behind Sephiroth is there waiting to kill you
Or you can wake up with Godzilla and King Kong destroying your city while fighting it's horrifying, unfortunately the movie didn't even mentioned this part
I like to think that there was a deal that toons from toontown were allowed to live in the boundaries of Los Angeles 😗
That is the worst idea of all time. Why tf would people care about something as mundane and boring as that. Watch some sol anime if you want that shit but as a movie what a Garbo idea but I guess that’s why you’re a UA-cam commentator and not involved in film in any way lmao
I both hated and loved this movie, though the use of Ugly Sonic and his actual impact on the plot was great (tho lego movie is still far superior at references)
That's a bad sign. People said the same about Space Jam 2.
According to the original storyboards it was originally meant to be Jar-Jar Binks before being changed to 'Ugly' Sonic later in development.
@@thomaswedge42 awww man really. i think jar jar would be much more funnier :/
This Sonic look worse than the old trailer of him. He looks nothing like it.
@@zytotempol8154 And I suppose Peter Pan doesn't look nothing like what we remember too. Think they did it on purpose, keep up, love.
The only thing I disliked about this movie is what they did to Peter pan.
They made fun of the actual hardships of Bobby driscal, who after being dumped by disney at the age of ten, was mercilessly bullied and later in his adult life took to drugs and alcohol, eventually being buried in 'a poppers' grave in New York. Did I tell you he was the voice of peter pan?
I don’t get how making his backstory integral to the character is ‘making fun of him’. I mean yeah, he’s fat and old but there’s hardly any jokes regarding it aside from being old and fat. Nothing about the backstory. Chip even says how it’s hard in this business. There’s no jokes about it at all.
I know, they literally could've gotten anyone in disneys large category of movies
Using him was literally the point, dude.
Pauper's*
Oh boohoo kid who made a fortune before he even hit puberty didnt get the privileged life he wanted and had to work like the rest of us. What a woeful existence
I like to think what separates this movie from all those other generic "HEY LOOK AT THIS" crossover movies is that it's able to put a lot of cases- including its own IPs- in negative or somewhat disturbing lights. For example, the fact that in this canon, Jack Skellington from Tim Burton's *The Nightmare Before Christmas* is apparently embezzling funds from his own charity- who- who thought of this?? It's just so outright insane and strange to think about that Disney *actually* signed off on this, and that's what makes it great.
You see Jimmy Neutron in a crossover movie, you're like "okay. sure" but you see Jimmy Neutron's iconic hair seperated from him in the context that he was surgically transformed into a bootlegged abomination, it's gonna make you go "WHAT!?" because you're not gonna expect that. With the horrific context, instead of the cameo shocking you for just being there, it's the CONTEXT that shocks you for just being there. And, much like Roger Rabbit, Chip & Dale is an INCREDIBLY dark world full of, for lack of a better term, cartoon violence, and not the kind you see in ratings. That shock factor is what makes the cameos good to me.
I agree with everything you said.
Wow did I actually read this whole thing?
Or you know, we don't hate references, but how they are executed.... 🤦♂
Honest this movie was surprisingly good, the references feel natural and unforced. I enjoyed the look of the movie. I'd give it a solid 8/10.
It’s a shame the trailer is so awful, then.
honestly I wasn’t even hyped for this movie when it was announced, granted I did watch it and it’s not as bad as I thought but it’s not a good movie to me, I would rate it for me a 6/10 . I can definitely see why people would like it but it’s not for me and that’s ok. But it’s definitely better than any Alvin and the chipmunks movie
@@KairiKH21 when I saw the trailer I was very much, "This could either be really good, or really shitty." hehe really came down to did they go all in on the insanity, or did they just make it a gimmick and they went all in.
When the dumpling calls the unnatural and forced references natural and unforced
No
The amount of licensing they had to do for this must of cost in the millions
I think that alot of them aren't licensed to Disney (ex: ugly sonic is only there because he falls under the parody thing) and some characters are parodies
Roger Rabbit had a smaller budget and had most 30s black and white cartoons from Paramount, WB, MGM and Universal.
The fake 2d isn't really Disney's 2d hate either, though. To me it seems that they had absolutely no faith in this project, hence why they could get away with so much and the whole film was dumped onto Disney+ (As well as the terrible marketing and tale of how this was originally supposed to be just another origin film based in the show's universe). It's clear that the lonely Island put in WAY more love and care into this film than Disney expected, but they still gave them an incredibly small budget because of their lack of faith. It explains why all the background cameos and characters are 2d vs the main characters being cell shaded 2d.
No hate, just my theory as to why that's the case.
Also because this kind of fits the description of “reference fest” there is a web-comic called “The adventures of Scoob and Shag” that is really good and kind of does the “TV characters IRL trope reeeaaallly well. It mixes comedy and a well-written story.
Ah hello fellow nerd
@@TheOtherOne6018 I’m glad someone else knows what I’m talking about. I wish you a good day.
The one with the ballyhoos?
Lmao, a webcomic. 😂
"rather than the references taking the center of the frame" THREE SCENES are dedicated to sliding through different cameos. lets not kid ourselves lol
TBH I'm still kind of shocked at how much I liked this movie. My only real complaint was the whole controversy behind Sweet Pete, but beyond that, everything about it is pretty good!
I'm still surprised we didn't get a cameo of Mabel Pines interacting with Louise Belcher .
Why is that surprising
@@ikarainijirai4285 Mabel and Louise are voiced by the same person (Kristen Schaal).
@@alexmapp5444 yeah it's like the joke in a Futurama episode where a character meets another character from a completely different series and they do the same VA joke there.
@@alexmapp5444 I mean I know that, I'm just confused as to why they were surprised about that not being acknowledged in the movie when there are tons of more character pairs in media that are voiced by the same person (as much as I hate to admit, Seth Rogen's popularity was probably the reason why they chose him as the same voice actor gag)
@@ikarainijirai4285 They were probably thinking since Mable was from one of Disney’s most popular animated series and Bob’s Burgers is a Disney/Fox property it would be an easy thing to pull off.
Space jam: throw it all together without story nor inspiration. And make it barely make any sense
Rescue rangers: At least make some cameos do something. Or have any relevance in the plot (which space jam didn't even have)
“Some”???
Yes Look at ugly sonic .... he was indeed disny /;[
@@silashurd3597 Yeah man, not every single cameo did something relevant to the plot. Like the Mane 6 or Mantis, pumba and Bob
@@EduardoMartinez-rs3bu ok!
What I mean was like how when I said “some” I meant like “there are way more than some cameos” but I just misread it.
Thank you and have a good day🙂
Oh yea, happy Queen day. I'm too much of a workaholic to take a bank holiday off haha...
7:11 you know what, maybe I shouldn't show my 6 year old sister this movie.
The museum sequence of the "Mortal Engines" books references Mickey Mouse as an idol of the pre-war-past, but the movie adaptation had no rights to Mickey Mouse, so they did the unnatural thing to replace Mickey with Minions. A decent Stand in, but not a good choice, set to the [We Are About To Lose Our American Deities] throwaway joke, because mickey clearly is more famous than Minions.
7:26 literally never expected this line
It's weird how this movie changed my mind about it every few minutes
"that's cool!" "that's bad..." "that's wonderful!" "that's pathetic..." "that's clever!" "that's cringey..."
What do you think about the fact that they have Peter Pan as a character and his story pretty much exactly matches the first kid to play Peter Pan and they made him the villain?
Feels kinda cold
I wasn’t a massive fan of the Peter Pan reference given what happened to the original voice actor of the character. It was a little too close and felt a bit uncomfortable.
You consolidate the idea perfectly toward the end of the video: demonstrating depth.
Why don't we like Ready Player One? For the same reason we don't like The Big Bang Theory. They don't demonstrate deep understanding of their references, but rather they just refer to them and hope that this is a novel enough concept to be fun. And to some people it is. But to most people, that doesn't fly.
Ready Player One makes this mistake regularly: the Iron Giant is used as a weapon because "hey remember the iron giant?" Despite its entire story being about how it is more than just a weapon. Pop-culture stories like the Breakfast Club are mentioned, and trivia about them is thrown in, but the themes of that story are never even remotely considered. Just mentioning the thing is all they do.
Chip and Dale succeeds because it demonstrates understanding - things that aren't important enough to be explored as part of the plot are relegated to just background references. This demonstrates understanding of why the reference is in the movie. And the engagement of making interesting jokes of the background reference further cements that fact. The references that _are_ used front and centre are not just mentioned, but looked at in detail. Ugly sonic isn't just there to look ugly, but to appear throughout the movie, for instance.
The big bang theory fails because it just refers to nerdy concepts without engaging with how people like them. Wreck-It-Ralph 2 fails because it regularly puts its references front-and-centre, failing to understand that they are just easter-eggs. In contrast, the new Spiderman succeeds because it calls back to the characters and pasts of the returning spidermen and has them meaningfully interact with their villains and each other on top of the "haha remember when Tobey got depressed" type moments.
I felt this way about the story "Wonder". It regularly makes references to Star Wars without demonstrating deeper understanding of the movies. For instance, in the movie, one kid calls another kid ugly by comparing him to Palpatine, but any star wars fan would love to be compared to that lord of camp. It clearly fails to show that it understands its reference on a deeper level.
Demonstrating understanding of your reference is what makes it a meaningful addition to your story rather than just a pandering add-on.
I feel like you’re really over analyzing this. A reference is just supposed to be a little nod to something. It’s only there to catch the attention to the people who care about the source material.
I can see the guys point but yea I may have to agree with ya
I heard with Ready Player One (and as someone who read the original book), the Iron Giant was supposed to be Ultraman but they couldn't get the permission for him. Which is sad, and honestly, they couldn't tried a ranger megazord, I think if the reference had to have more meaning, a reference to another power up action kid show would've been wonderful. No Ultraman, then Power Rangers!!
Love the analysis btw.
Idk if i’m missing something but i fail to see how RD1 is comparable here, RD1 is essentially if vr chat evolved more than significantly and somehow became the single method of playing all your favorite games, if i see a master chief throwing it back i am not going to stand there and point that “master chief would never do that” because in reality there’s a real person on the other side who most likely is not master chief also pretty sure there’s only 1 chief so 1:39 contradicts his whole 1 man army schtick
Same thing with iron giant, just someone who wanted to be look like or be or control an iron giant, they are all visually husks controlled by a diverse types of people ofc they aren’t going to be the same as the way they…dress?
Could they have done that? absolutely
Would it have worked?
probably
Is it on the same level as referencing something in name only and having it be there for the sake of a shallow reference
Absolutely Not
You can be anything you want in this game in that movie’s world, this is about the people finding solace in escaping their real life visuals with in game visuals even/especially when it comes to changing themselves this isn’t about the characters being referenced so it’s a fairly poor example, either they choose media characters known far and wide or the give everyone an entirely unique appearance…which i personally wouldn’t care about
Seeing characters i know but not as them just other goofs wearing their visuals is far more appealing and will hook your attention..or at least others like me who get the reference because in this case it doesn’t need to be deep…
That might contradict what i said earlier and if it does then hey everyone’s a hypocrite but again i don’t believe RD1’s references should be delved too deep into, they’re there because that’s exactly what it’s like to hop into vr chat which is almost completely similar…or maybe they actually are quite similar
To me, this film did what Looney Tunes Back in Action wanted to do.
They even made a similar joke. Chip 'n Dale had Fast and Furious Babies; Back in Action had Lethal Weapon Babies.
As someone who grew up watching Chip'n' dail, I loved this movie. It has ugly sonic too. How can you not love ugly sonic?
You say you love him but didnt want him to be in his own movie. I see you .
@@decembersbitch7694 who said he didnt want him?
@@StudAnimator thats fair
Ugly sonic is great and funny because he’s been noted as _ugly_ sonic. Lots of people didn’t want him as the actual sonic but the fact he’s been given a whole new embraced identity is hilarious and that’s why he works better than the original idea of him being the true sonic.
Im pretty sure Wreck-it-Ralphs portrayal of treating the internet like a museum is a very accurate display of just how people use the internet. Kids will swipe through videos for hours and simply pass by so many features.
What kills that movie is the awful writing. That trainwreck of a movie was so bad I distanced myself from Disney for a while.
Another thing that helped the movie is that fair amount of the cameos were from non-Disney or properties that Disney owns that are less popular so it felt less like they were trying make make a sale.
One thing I found funny in Wreck-it Ralphs 2 was was C-3PO being the princess's butler.
needed more Gadget and the rest of the rangers. it wasn't a huge thing, but i'm still a little disappointed that chip 'n dale didn't sound like chip 'n dale. and they should have done actual 2d animation, instead of obvious cell shaded cgi that they try to pass off as 2d animation. other than that, the movie was good enough. i hope if they decide to so another one, that it is an actual rescue rangers movie.
They could have used the robot chicken voice actors for chip and dale from the gadget's new pantsuit gag. They sounded both unique and close to the original cast actors of the chipmunks
All I could think about was Big Mouth since it's the same voice actor
Honestly, I would have gone crazy if I had to listen to 1 hour of those high pitched voices.
@@Thomasmemoryscentral they could have just used the original voice actor. They already got them to come back to do Gadget. Even the original voice actor for monty was in the movie, but not as monty.
"... the uncanny valley! actually, why wasnt sonic there?"
that got me
How the heck did Disney manage to get the rights to use most of the characters in this film even if they were only references? That's my real question, there were so many of them.
Yeah Roger Rabbit especially. Steven Spielberg and Disney did not get along like he did with Warner Brothers.
@@rommix0 Roger Rabbit is a Disney property, not a Spielberg property. Disney bought the rights to film for the character/story the same year the novel was released. Spielberg was an executive producer but it was a Touchstone film and distributed by Buena Vista, both Disney owned names.
@ChunkyCoffeeW rong Roger Rabbit wasn't a Disney character he only showed up once that it you don't see Roger Rabbit ever again. Only once but original Who Frame Roger Rabbit at least gets more time than a once in Chip n Dale Rescue Rangers the movie. Oh, look up. Who Frame Roger Rabbit from Channel Awesome UA-cam channel.
3:45 I loved that little sign of respect to Phineas & Ferb. (and in hindsight, it also felt like a nod for the entire history of Disney Channel animated shows, which are basically my entire childhood)🥰
6:58
I just wanted to congratulate you for being the first youtuber this year I have heard say "Bodacious"
I think this movie took a note from detective pikachu in terms of how to use references properly. In both movies the references aren't so in your face but at the same time give some sort of info to the world in which these characters live in. With chip n dale you don't have to be familiar with all of the IP's in this movie in order to enjoy it heck you don't even have to know who chip n dale are to enjoy it either. Detective pikachu did the same thing you didn't have to be a fan of the franchise (although it helps) to enjoy the movie and what is being presented.
Loved the fact that you pointed out my favorite thing from the film and that's the Gucci Dobby!
What definitely makes it work is the inclusion of FAR more than just Disney properties in Chip & Dale vs mostly only Disney properties in Ralph Breaks the Internet. It gives the impression that this was a decision made for artistic purposes, since this would have been a legal NIGHTMARE, and not that it's acting as a giant Disney advertisement.
5:40 seeing blaster (the transformer) here made me way happier than it probably should have. They coulda done any character for a transformers shoutout, optimus prime, bumblebee, megatron, but no, not only did they ignore the more well known live action movies, but picked a C list fan favourite who was only ever important in the 80s. Dope stuff
4:09 how did I never see this
have a cameo every 2 seconds and bam! everyone eats it up
I realized that "Oh My" sounds phonetically similar to "Umai" (うまい). Intensional?
6:38 Are those mice having a seizure?
7:10 Ironic, since one of the Paw Patrol characters is a police dog...fighting against the police
I actually absolutely love all the cameos in Chip n Dale, I think it's awesome
Honestly, this movie was underrated.
We already have a joke about John Ratzenberger's many roles. It was in the credits for Cars. There's a segment where, following the newfound popularity of Radiator Springs, the Radiator Springs Drive-In Theater is up and running again, and Mack is present to be as inconsiderate as possible, loudly claiming during Toy Car Story, "Whoever does the voice of that piggy truck, I'm tellin' ya, he's one great actor", commenting on Monster Trucks, Inc. "That abominable snowplow is quite the comic thespian", and finally, while watching A Bug's Life, "Wait a minute here, they're just using the same actor over and over! What kinda cut-rate production is this?"
In my opinion, the best animated crossover movie currently is The Lego Movie
Speaking of great references that aren't overtly addressed, I love how they perfectly captured the "cheap CGI commercial character" look with Chip's insurance coworkers shown at 4:24.
1:22 LEGO Batman Movie also had quite a big crossover with a plethora of different movie monsters and villains.😉
imma be honest i love this movie because of everything you mentioned and i feel like this at least in terms of references and cameos should be a standard for the future of "pop culture, the movie" like movies
8:52 that Seth Rogan joke was not forced, it was brilliant, we got Bob the Dwarf being laughed at live action Pumbaa, Mantis, and B.O.B.
It's literally a Seth Rogen character interacting with other characters that he voiced, I don't know where is the humor there.
@@edman813 they all have the exact same iconic laugh
" Gucci Dobby is cannon!" -Dazz Reviews
I like that someone remembered Grape Ape and featured him in the background.
I hope there is sequel to this. It was really good.
i did not expect to get reck-it ralph rolled
"Desperate to get a emotional reaction out of us for just using our eyes"
That's a good one.
My favorite part of the movie was definitely “he has polar express eyes”
Now for *my* review. I loved this movie, it had its imperfections but it was good! I love the crossovers, and while watching this movie with my family everyone was mad at me because I *constanly* pointed things out or laughed, great watch, amazing humor, definitely not a Disney-esc feel
3:04 I argue that the whole Disneyland bit wasn't even a cameo. That's Disney telling you, "Hey, all this stuff you're looking at, WE OWN ALL OF THIS."
I just found out that the role that Ugly Sonic was in was originally supposed to go to JAR JAR BINKS!!!
Oh well
I honestly quite liked the movie. It felt like it scratches the same itch Wreck It Ralph did. Learning about how Sweet Pete's story parallels that of the actual Peter Pan actor, though, has really soured it for me. I thought his storyline was clever upon first watch, but now it just feels gross. If it was a coincidence it was an egregious mistake to miss, and if it was on purpose it's unbelievably tasteless
Oh heck! I remember when my little brother went through a Boss Baby: Back in Business phase! That's all that was ever on tv for so LONG in our house! TRAUMATISED now FOR LIFE!!!
The whole ugly Sonic thing overstayed it's welcome, it's just like "hey guys remember ugly sonic we sure do now remember ugly sonic and how ugly he is"
Seriously, it might've been funny as a background joke or just a line or two but they just kept hammering the joke in, and everyone ate it up because of how "meta" they were about it.
People laughing at him was also extremely strange, because everyone was disgusted by his appearance, where do they get the idea he's a laughingstock, when he should have made people want to throw up over anything.
Cameos are great when they're not forced in
I'd probably think this level of cameos from MANY studios, not just Disney themselves, but also DreamWorks, Nickelodeon, the *Mane Six,* and even getting Fievel Mousekewitz to cameo (there is a picture of what seems to be a bootleg of him at Sweet Pete's Warehouse; good luck finding this golden egg! Actually, I think I can see this film as a great Easter egg hunt for fans of animation like myself, if you want to save on plastic eggs, that is) in this, is plenty like how the 1936 Merrie Melodies short "The CooCoo Nut Grove" managed to pull off the many celebrity caricatures (props to character designer and then-future Disney employee T. (Thornton) Hee for those).
I think the difference is, we can tell when it's done purely for money and when there's at least some heart to it
Wreck it Ralph speaks for the corporate families that can't take a bad joke, like bright colors and product placement.
Chip 'n Dale speaks for the cosplayers and geeks stuck in the 70s to 2000, like less saturated colors and product placement.
I liked the Blaster cameo early on in Rescue Rangers because I'm a massive Transformers geek, but it also provides an example of Disney being both too good and not good enough at animating. I've watched plenty of G1 Transformers episodes to know that CEL animation for the time was not that sharp, the only exception to this with Transformers is The Transformers: The Movie (1986) because everyone involved wanted to make the Transformers' theatrical premier as good as possible. I might buy that Blaster was supposed to be based on the movie, but even then, the animation still had that classic CEL frame fuzzy visual, albeit not so prominent because, again, a lot more time, care, and attention to detail went into the '86 movie, and even with that extra effort, the section for this movie's animation errors alone on the Transformers Wiki is probably longer than most of the site's full articles.
Basically what I'm saying is that Blaster's physical appearance is perfect, to such an extent that it breaks the effect of blending many media into one product because he is _too_ perfect.
Disney of all people, criticizing reboots and remakes? just by this, I love this movie
it is very simple: Blaster from transformers G1 is one of the least recognizable, and they gave him a cameo in the movie.
right there, at 5:39
Crazy how the entire solution of this movies plot was built off a publicly hated design of a blue hedgehog
I also like how the references actually mean something through the movie. Sure there’s some random references but at least it feels natural for the world that was made. The references even mean something to the theme of the movie with all the bootlegging, Peter Pan, and chip and dale. It’s not a perfect 10/10 but it’s a good,fun 7/10 or 8/10 movie that you can tell the animators and voice actors had a blast making.
Nope, not gonna fall for this Mickey Mouse bait. Almost did, til I heard about the original storyboard for the convention scene. Ugly Sonic wasn't the original character seated across our squirrel friends. It was JAR JAR BINKS! Guess you only have love for one scorned character, huh ? Damn, Disney, you did Ahmed Best dirty again!
Damn you can’t even enjoy the movie
guicc dobby caught me of guard XD
It's the single brand thing. When the pool is too small just looks off and annoys.
5:22 I bet one Morbillion people laugh hard at this scene.
Okay, i need to see this movie!
Are you saying 'depth'? It sounds like you're saying deft
RIP Bobby Driscoll
ngl the first wreck it ralph was actually so amazing, especially as a kid, but then they decided to just completely throw the whole concept away from the first movie, and made ralph breaks the internet 😭literally so bad
3:08 Little like the lesser known Disney Channel show "House of Mouse", where practically all the Disney characters up to that point watch cartoons with Mickey and his crew.😉
5:40 Now I would what the movie for the good cameos BUT especially for this one scene with the Autobot
Great film, this. Loved it!
Decent movie, though the main villain and his backstory is just straight up evil on Disney’s part
That's definitely a turn off. It's like Disney knew how they treated Driscoll and wanted to rub it in our faces because they have money and they can. It's scummy.
@@rommix0 it’s like something South Park Disney would do lmao
This goes beyond time and space!
I still can't get over the fact that in 3:31 they managed to put in Randy Marsh from South Park, a show meant for adults-
I just hope this will get popped on Blu ray, shame Disney plus thing do not seem to get them.
5:45
Yooooo Pickle Rick!!!
Didn't notice him when i saw the movie
Me: I've successfully avoided all spiderman spoilers until I finally get to see it this weekend!
This video: oh no you don't buckaroo, this is what you get for trying!
6:31 If you look closely, Cubby is actually animated in traditional 2D style, but Peter Pan isn't. Peter himself is made with a technique called "cel-shading", in which the CG model is given a black outline, making them seem like a hand-drawn character, when in reality they aren't.😉
All this movie is is the meme: hey *whistles while holding beer pointing at tv screen with cigarette”
3:15 i am NOT tripping i swear i heard him say ''Philza's"
Idk how him of all people would watch philza,or even the dsmp,then again,my mind is corrupt by the dsmp and every single thing that can be refrensed to it is now popping into my head,its probably someone else with 'za' at the end of their name,for some reason,and no, its not Jazza,or maybe its just two different words that he said so fast it sounded like he said philza
Edit-yup,im still hearing it.
Honestly I feel like these are different for everyone depending on how much you like the franchise
This made me want the Teeth Cut even more
I honestly expected Ugly Sonic to go fast at the end when he showed up with the FBI to truly complete his redemption ark that he can still go fast as that's who he is and don't have to worry that's Sonic's thing.
Holy cow... In 11 other universes, β-Sonic would _absolutely_ be a throwaway gag in the dedicated "weird CG" scene! 😮
“Ch-ch-ch-ch-chip and dale rescue rangers” - Post malones very creative lyrics 2022
The best Wreck-It Ralph 2 scene is the wreckroll, change my mind
Are you willing to make a video sharing your opinion on Sonic 2
I _just_ noticed the Ugly Sonic artwork in the background after watching this video... somehow I completely missed that in my initial watching. (5:18)