Ses 2: Present Value Relations I

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 20 вер 2024
  • MIT 15.401 Finance Theory I, Fall 2008
    View the complete course: ocw.mit.edu/15-...
    Instructor: Andrew Lo
    License: Creative Commons BY-NC-SA
    More information at ocw.mit.edu/terms
    More courses at ocw.mit.edu

КОМЕНТАРІ • 390

  • @dasayan05
    @dasayan05 3 роки тому +213

    Delivered in 2008, still generating knowledge flow. This lecture series is a pretty valuable asset.

  • @angiegao2875
    @angiegao2875 3 роки тому +106

    Best part of lockdown -- discovering gems like this on UA-cam.

    • @Theferg1
      @Theferg1 3 роки тому

      @Angie Gao Did you go though all the lectures?

    • @angiegao2875
      @angiegao2875 3 роки тому +2

      @@Theferg1 ahh nope lol

    • @UmTheMuse
      @UmTheMuse 3 роки тому +8

      @@Theferg1 I have. They're all fantastic, but if you have to skip, at least watch the last two. His personal theories around adaptive markets make a lot of sense, and his concept of irrationality as a dissonance between different parts of the brain was really eye-opening

  • @markuscwatson
    @markuscwatson 8 років тому +401

    pretty cool that this lecture was from a day or two after the financial collapse of 2008

    • @hidekitojo902
      @hidekitojo902 6 років тому +5

      There was more than one collapse, so what collapse are you talking about?

    • @rayart88
      @rayart88 5 років тому +36

      were there multiple financial collapses of 2008??

    • @MysticBazooka
      @MysticBazooka 5 років тому +1

      rayart8 😂

    • @AlvinGuoSubscribe
      @AlvinGuoSubscribe 4 роки тому +7

      @@hidekitojo902 The one in 2008

    • @joydivine4587
      @joydivine4587 3 роки тому

      Epic

  • @ArtMaknev
    @ArtMaknev 5 років тому +257

    This youtube class is an asset!

    • @miklovelka9797
      @miklovelka9797 5 років тому +16

      Asset only for the Viewers, he forgot to put ads on it to generate cashflows

    • @TheFeintOfHearts
      @TheFeintOfHearts 4 роки тому +32

      @@miklovelka9797 He said an asset can still be an asset with cashflow values of zero. So this class is still an asset for him, just an asset with a zero cashflow.

    • @AbhishekKumar-vf4pe
      @AbhishekKumar-vf4pe 4 роки тому +22

      @@miklovelka9797 still it is an asset for MIT because MIT has created a goodwill which is asset

    • @kenkawasaki
      @kenkawasaki 4 роки тому +9

      Miklo Velka You know that I know that you know it's an asset.

    • @leexiong5581
      @leexiong5581 3 роки тому +3

      @@miklovelka9797 he said reputation is a sort of assets right? :)

  • @tinacofactory
    @tinacofactory 5 місяців тому +14

    April 2024 and still these lectures are f*cking awesome! Thanks for sharing!

  • @d0fabur5st82
    @d0fabur5st82 4 роки тому +22

    lectures from MIT are available freely online. What a time to be alive

  • @elishab5779
    @elishab5779 4 роки тому +82

    In the middle of the lecture I called my friend and told her that she needs to leave everything aside and watch this video. She is a geologist and just yesterday she said that she wants to understand finance.
    Prof. Lo's first lecture is a good motivator for a person like me who is new to finance. he is got amazing style to keep you hooked and looking forward for further sessions.

    • @raman6581
      @raman6581 4 роки тому +1

      ua-cam.com/video/vTs2IQ8OefQ/v-deo.html
      ua-cam.com/video/WQui_3Hpmmc/v-deo.html
      they are worth a watch too

    • @mugabo2911
      @mugabo2911 2 роки тому +3

      i happen to be a geologist watching this and i somehow read your comment!

    • @rebeccaangelaa
      @rebeccaangelaa 7 місяців тому +2

      @@mugabo2911 this is crazy because same, why are there so many geologists here hahaha

    • @jupiterinaries6150
      @jupiterinaries6150 Місяць тому +1

      @@rebeccaangelaaperhaps because gold backs the $ and comes from the earth?

  • @anshika7758
    @anshika7758 10 місяців тому +22

    Timestamps are as follows:
    Ses 2: Present Value Relations I
    Auction Items and Their Values
    00:00
    Government Takeover of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac
    02:42
    Uncertainty in Financial Markets
    05:40
    Government Backing for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac
    08:24
    Decline of Common Stock Value
    11:00
    Government-Sponsored Entities and Their Mandate
    13:11
    Impact on Shareholders of Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae
    15:53
    Defining Assets in Financial Terms
    18:27
    The Concept of Trade Secrets as Valuable Assets
    21:20
    Assets: Patents, Trade Secrets, and Value Creation
    23:49
    The Fundamental Definition of an Asset
    26:24
    Assets Are Sequences, Not Sums
    29:32
    Assets Defined by Current and Future Cash Flows
    32:10
    The Value of Assets: Introduction to the Value Operator (Vt)
    34:50
    Perfect and Imperfect Markets: Evaluating Market Efficiency
    37:45
    Importance of Understanding Cash Flow Timing
    40:10
    Currency Conversion Analogy for Cash Flows
    43:03
    Converting Cash Flows to a Base Currency
    46:33
    Importance of Exchange Rates in Valuation
    49:49
    Obtaining Exchange Rates from Financial Markets
    53:32
    Discount Factors and Impatience in Perfect Certainty
    55:53
    Valuation and Management
    58:49
    Simplifying Assumptions for Valuation
    1:02:49
    The Opportunity Cost of Capital (r)
    1:06:58
    Building a Valuation Operator
    1:11:40

    • @pj101
      @pj101 6 місяців тому

      Thank you 🎉

  • @MrSupernova111
    @MrSupernova111 9 років тому +255

    What an amazing professor! I wish my professors were as passionate and good at teaching.

    • @av7531
      @av7531 7 років тому +2

      MrSupernova111 Same

    • @ttijp153
      @ttijp153 3 роки тому +1

      I feel you...

    • @t-raw2412
      @t-raw2412 2 роки тому

      @@av7531 I fefwlovet

    • @runethorsen8423
      @runethorsen8423 2 роки тому

      Good at teaching? You mean good at lying. Good at narrating... Good at story telling.

    • @tinacofactory
      @tinacofactory 5 місяців тому +2

      @@runethorsen8423 r u a professional hater?

  • @mona716
    @mona716 4 роки тому +54

    To anyone cramming for an exam, the lecture starts at 19 min. Before that he discusses the recent developments in the financial crisis.

  • @marymayyun
    @marymayyun 11 місяців тому +5

    I watched this lecture to get myself ready for a MBA program without having business or finance major in undergrad.
    I think I am getting it slowly.
    I am so grateful to find this channel.

  • @TMG_Dude
    @TMG_Dude 3 роки тому +45

    *How invaluable for this to be recorded at that time.* This is beautiful

  • @Flalexandre
    @Flalexandre Рік тому +31

    I'm here after the SVB crash. I feel 2008 will come again and i want to be as prepared as i can be. Not my area (i'm a mechanical engineer) but i think everyone should learn Finance at some extent. Thank you MIT for this free classes!🙏

    • @ananthvankipuram4012
      @ananthvankipuram4012 Рік тому +3

      exactly my thoughts. And Like FannieMae and FreddieMac were "takeover" First Republican Bank's assets were absorbed by JPMC on a Fire sale. Same happened across the pond with Credit Suisse absorbed by UBS. History does repeat folks!. And the best way to make sense of it all is to listen to Andrew Lo's lectures on Finance theory. Also as an Electrical Engineer this will help me assess future investment opportunities

  • @defiscottii1289
    @defiscottii1289 11 місяців тому +2

    Love how open and transparent he is discussing the circumstances of the times. He didn't shy away from any question

  • @loi-huynh
    @loi-huynh 8 років тому +303

    This is like learning physics from Einstein himself.

    • @Deshammanideep
      @Deshammanideep 5 років тому +36

      If Einstein teaches physics,
      You will not understand anything. Art of Teaching is a science in itself.

    • @sophisticatedlyaawara1304
      @sophisticatedlyaawara1304 4 роки тому +7

      I don't know sir if you will read this or not. But I don't think, the reason why second auction went for 60 $ was because it was bigger in size. You revealed what was there in 1st box and so student thought there will be something cool in second box too. I think even if the size of 2nd box would have been smaller then then 1st one then also the price of second box would have been reached to 60 bucks.

    • @jon6082
      @jon6082 4 роки тому

      @@sophisticatedlyaawara1304 However I think that the knowledge inside the book may not only worth 60

    • @AufBerghofNAM
      @AufBerghofNAM 4 роки тому

      @@Deshammanideep i don't think so

    • @Deshammanideep
      @Deshammanideep 4 роки тому +1

      @@AufBerghofNAM Teaching is a profession by itself. There's no guarantee that great researchers can be great teachers.

  • @ttijp153
    @ttijp153 3 роки тому +19

    I'm being mesmerized. Professor Lo's the best of the best! His positive energy, passion and knowledge can blow you away. And I'm learning this for free!!! Thank you so much MIT!

    • @fitnesspoint2006
      @fitnesspoint2006 2 роки тому +1

      this is a perfect example of fallacy of authority, he justified all the bad loans that were handed out by saying what about the person who had subprime but paid all their debts on time, that is the exception tot he rule, the reason the housing market imploded was due to vast majority of subprime folks not being able to make monthly mortgage payments, millions of them, and then having to foreclose on their homes back to the banks

  • @tradingup2708
    @tradingup2708 Рік тому +7

    This professor is incredible! I study finance at USQ in Aus and this series has sparked my passion back to life. My boring lecturers really butcher this material. Love the passion and making this subject enjoyable!

    • @sidhant6511
      @sidhant6511 Місяць тому

      Hey! Do you know which brealy, myers and allen book professor lo talks about that the students were to read? Do reply if you know!

  • @Anahide_design
    @Anahide_design 3 роки тому +8

    Begginer in finance I struggled to calculate the intrinsic value with the DCF method. But with this lesson about present value it all makes sense.
    Good theory always makes the best foundations.

  • @seanmcnally51
    @seanmcnally51 6 років тому +33

    7:56 "nobody knew what was in that package"... reminiscent of "nobody knows what's in the bonds!" in the Big Short

  • @hkshetty
    @hkshetty 4 роки тому +16

    These lectures by Andrew Lo is very valuable. Although I am a CS graduate student, the simplicity of explanations and examples he gives makes me feel this a piece of cake. 😊

  • @shashankmehrotra7221
    @shashankmehrotra7221 4 роки тому +6

    absolutely amazing i m a science graduate and an MBA aspirant , and i have to say the way of teaching he have is absolutely marvelous one of the best teacher i have ever came across

  • @AlvinGuoSubscribe
    @AlvinGuoSubscribe 4 роки тому +4

    This lecture series is incredible. Doubled with the fact that the textbook is also available online as a PDF for free, as are the p-sets. Incredible.

    • @nirushanraj5697
      @nirushanraj5697 4 роки тому

      could you provide a link for the textbook?

    • @nirushanraj5697
      @nirushanraj5697 4 роки тому

      could you provide a link for the textbook?

    • @mitocw
      @mitocw  4 роки тому +5

      @@nirushanraj5697 The course materials that we have are available on MIT OpenCourseWare at: ocw.mit.edu/15-401F08. Best wishes on your studies!

    • @kauigirl808
      @kauigirl808 3 роки тому

      @@nirushanraj5697 just google the name of the textbook.

  • @mahdi8835
    @mahdi8835 5 років тому +16

    "I had something that I wanted to unload and I unloaded it at a price that two mutually consenting adults agreed to" he chuckled a little bit here.
    Great lecture btw

  • @roryboytube
    @roryboytube 6 років тому +26

    Interesting to compare this course with The Yale Open courses Theory of Finance. The MIT course wins in terms of application and clear delivery. The Yale course is good but far more abstract. Watching the two however will give you a great understanding of Finance from two World class colleges.... for free. (better than wasting $80,000 ++ on an MBA )

  • @Jacob-om4gn
    @Jacob-om4gn Рік тому +3

    Now I'm starting to learn about the finance because of Sir Andrew Lo. Thanks Sir and whoever records this treasure lecture videos. Thanks again. Peace.

  • @anara5570
    @anara5570 3 роки тому +10

    As of 2021 nothing has changed, this lesson still stands strong

    • @fitnesspoint2006
      @fitnesspoint2006 2 роки тому

      this is a perfect example of fallacy of authority, he justified all the bad loans that were handed out by saying what about the person who had subprime but paid all their debts on time, that is the exception tot he rule, the reason the housing market imploded was due to vast majority of subprime folks not being able to make monthly mortgage payments, millions of them, and then having to foreclose on their homes back to the banks

    • @AmericanImperialMenswear
      @AmericanImperialMenswear Рік тому

      ​@fitnesspoint2006 he wasn't justifying it, he was saying that every situation has an upside and a downside depending on the perspective taken. Which is true of literally anything.

  • @chrisj245
    @chrisj245 Рік тому +1

    Definition of Asset at time T(i.e. sequence of all future cashflow) and how to calculate "net" present value is discussed in this class (Ch 2.1 - 2.2). It's important to consider cashflow in different times like we consider different currencies(£150 vs. ¥300). We get the exchange rate from "the market."

  • @S1mple0bserver
    @S1mple0bserver 4 роки тому +4

    I love how he teaches Finance!
    The best course I have ever seen!

  • @shivakumararun1215
    @shivakumararun1215 Рік тому +1

    You're one of the best professors on this planet! There's absolutely no doubt in that! Thank you sir!

  • @nitinbahwal379
    @nitinbahwal379 3 роки тому +7

    It felt like I was in the class. No wonder why he's at MIT Sloan. Kudos to prof 👍🏻

  • @evanbenjamin3020
    @evanbenjamin3020 6 місяців тому

    I would do almost anything to go back in time and sit in this class in the middle of the 2008 financial crisis. Can you imagine some of these same students in 2024 looking back at this and just realizing the impact of being in this class in 2008? I pray other professors adopt this teaching style. 🙏

  • @donschiff01
    @donschiff01 8 років тому +7

    Thank you! This is a great discussion on Net Present Value and definition of an asset. This is worth watching.

  • @lydetpidor
    @lydetpidor 9 років тому +34

    Looking forward to learning another courses relate to Economic for either senior or master degree. It's very helpful for youth in developing countries who are eager to learn from such best university.
    More importantly, it would be great if the such course videos update annually or bi-yearly since to make sure that it provide an up to date online learning.

    • @G5Nvm
      @G5Nvm 7 років тому +7

      Would be no point for spending so much money on these colleges if knowledge and information like this was so easily accessible.

  • @aayush_dutt
    @aayush_dutt 4 роки тому +109

    Who is watching this as the Covid-19 unfolds!?

    • @xuanyidu3259
      @xuanyidu3259 4 роки тому

      me

    • @RaylinRecords
      @RaylinRecords 3 роки тому

      Craziness

    • @JammyTom
      @JammyTom 3 роки тому +1

      Just got laid off

    • @RaylinRecords
      @RaylinRecords 3 роки тому +1

      @@JammyTom I'm so sorry to hear that : (

    • @JammyTom
      @JammyTom 3 роки тому

      @@RaylinRecords thank you 🙏 but at least we can learn finance 👍

  • @leonhardmay3569
    @leonhardmay3569 3 місяці тому +2

    At 1:07:30, when prof Lo starts speaking about interest rates/future values of today's $1, it seems that nobody questions why all rates r in formula:
    $1 in Year 0 = $1 x (1 + r)^T in Year T
    are the same. It was conveniently assumed we negotiated fixed interest rates for all accounting periods at present time so simple formula follows. In general all rates could be different:
    $1 in Year 0 = $1 x (1 + r(0,T)) in Year T,
    where r(0,T) would be some empirically ("from the market", but actually dictated by monetary policy regulator) determined (usually positive) number that follows from previously mentioned exchange rate $(0)/$(T) = 1 + r(0,T).
    Without the subtle assumption we fix all the rates to r(0,1) the analysis wouldn't stand as correct. That is, mentioned (1 + z(0,T)) doesn't necessarily have to be same as (1+r(0,1))^T.

  • @carlos7mh
    @carlos7mh Рік тому +2

    Can anyone please explain how we can treat future cash flows as certain values? Intuitively I’d think there is uncertainty in determining such values years in advance, making them difficult to calculate.

  • @Alejoblocks
    @Alejoblocks 4 роки тому +25

    That poor guy lifting his hand lol

  • @MrNachoman21
    @MrNachoman21 3 роки тому +1

    Im over here paying $3000 a semester to learn economics and this FREE video has taught me more in one hour than 3 semesters at a University : )

  • @nebiaydin8212
    @nebiaydin8212 8 років тому +7

    Great content from great professor, I amazed how he presented ideas, great MIT, just great.

  • @e2kutt50
    @e2kutt50 2 роки тому +3

    17M/// watching this whole lecture, June 30th 2022.

  • @fayyazkhaleel
    @fayyazkhaleel Місяць тому

    Best professor in my life i heard so far .Thanks MIT for educating US this amazing subject.

  • @klesstwo
    @klesstwo 4 місяці тому

    at 4:15 - it's incredible to see an MIT finance lecture in 2008 provide live commentary on the Mortgage crisis - looking at most of the students there, they must have felt some insecurity about their employment post MBA - I wonder where are they now!

  • @shanyang6918
    @shanyang6918 7 років тому +8

    now i've figured out why i should've studied hard to got into the top college, eg. like MIT, Wharton. but my undergrad GPA is crap, sigh...

  • @vkoptchev
    @vkoptchev 3 роки тому +3

    Great lectures! Just want to note a minor typo. It should be V0 = CF0 + ($0/$1)CF1 + ..., instead of $1/$0 ...

    • @RAAC77
      @RAAC77 3 роки тому +1

      I also agree with you.

  • @salaryman540
    @salaryman540 4 роки тому +3

    When you have a great lecture, students applaud after the class.

  • @melophile00
    @melophile00 Рік тому +1

    At 53:00, he talks about how adding different cash flows (at different times) is similar to adding different currencies. Now, in the eqn it's written $1/$0 + $2/$0 +.....
    However I think since we are calculating present value, it should rather be $0/$1 + $0/$2 +......, so that $1, $2,... get cancelled and we're left with all values with unit $0, which is what we want (the present value of a cash flow $nCF.
    Where am I going wrong?

    • @Rin-gn4vq
      @Rin-gn4vq 2 місяці тому

      I came down to the comments hoping to find someone struggling with the same part, and I guess I've found a friend.
      You commented a year ago, so I was wondering if you ever did at the end find Andrew correcting this part.

    • @Rin-gn4vq
      @Rin-gn4vq 2 місяці тому

      PS I found many other guys stumbling upon the same issue in the comments, so we perhaps have proven ourselves correct?

  • @leeheonju
    @leeheonju 6 років тому +3

    This lecture is amazing. I am able to understand more easily. Thank MIT for that

  • @sixinghu9291
    @sixinghu9291 6 років тому +7

    really good professor. impressive, I want go mit

  • @nataliiakhotiaintseva3977
    @nataliiakhotiaintseva3977 3 роки тому

    now i see why this course of lectures wasn't updated from 2008 for 13 years!♡

  • @d36521
    @d36521 Рік тому +1

    Funny how I am watching this now in 2023 after the collapse of SVB... Very interesting times ahead...

  • @pavelshvechikov5436
    @pavelshvechikov5436 4 роки тому +2

    There is an error in "exchange rates" the professor defined for NPV calculation.
    Everywhere in the lecture ($_t / $_0) should be inversed: ($_0 / $_t).
    Otherwise, it is not consistent with currency exchange rates calculation and the logic: if future $ is more expensive than current $, then ($_t / $_0) > 1 and not ($_t / $_0) = 0.9, as in the lecture.

    • @hkslowhand
      @hkslowhand 4 роки тому

      Pavel Shvechikov I think the slide is correct? On the right side say 0.9, you can understand it as 0.9 /1. While left side is $ t/ $0. That means discounting

    • @RAAC77
      @RAAC77 3 роки тому

      I agree with you that ($_t / $_0) is inconsistent from of point of view of "units" and he should use ($_0 / $_t). Having said that, the value of the exchange rate is correct. If in the future CFt is more expensive it means that ($_0 / $_t) < 1.

  • @SmartInvestor
    @SmartInvestor 10 років тому +10

    Thank you so much for uploading this content.

  • @Lorenzconnok
    @Lorenzconnok 3 роки тому

    I love this series sofar.
    One correction I would like to add is - the government does not own the printing press.
    A private company called "The Federal Reserve" does, of which the chair is appointed by the president. This chair is appointed amidst a limited list provided to the president to choose from.
    It is important to understand this because a private company is beholden to shareholders, wherase a government entity is beholden to the people it represents. To understand finance this is crucial to grasp.

    • @jacksonluther
      @jacksonluther Рік тому +1

      Fed controls money supply treasury controls printing press

  • @hayatinthekitchen5345
    @hayatinthekitchen5345 6 років тому +4

    Im really glad to watch this lecture its very useful make finance very easy for me thank you alot allah blesse u

    • @miklovelka9797
      @miklovelka9797 5 років тому

      Allah does not exist your parents lied to you

  • @mariorivera2537
    @mariorivera2537 4 роки тому +1

    Teachers play an important role on student´s life; to see Mr. Lo with all of his wisdom and compromise is simply amazing!
    P.D. What a tough year on finances

  • @Diplomastronaut
    @Diplomastronaut 3 роки тому +3

    12 years later and we are back in the same economic state.

  • @restlessmillionaire
    @restlessmillionaire 14 днів тому

    - Market determined exchange rates on PV/NPV

  • @xuanyidu3259
    @xuanyidu3259 4 роки тому +2

    thank for mit for making this available for free!my dream is to get to sloan for my undergrad.

  • @crand20033
    @crand20033 4 роки тому +2

    He says an asset is a sequence of cash flows. But I always considered my vacuum cleaner an asset and I don't see how that equates to a sequence of cash flows.

    • @andyjiang8988
      @andyjiang8988 3 роки тому +1

      The vacuum clean could depreciate over time, a negative cash flow; every time you use, it served as a tool for cleaning, which contributed to the cash flow of appreciating your floor and the reputation of your personal image, some positive cash flow, there may be a time you decide to sell or throw it away, a negative flow or positive flow.

    • @davidljyu
      @davidljyu 3 роки тому

      All assets or objects are a sequence of cash flows cumulated.

    • @prabalkalita6753
      @prabalkalita6753 5 місяців тому

      Lol

  • @anudeep_tondothi
    @anudeep_tondothi 4 роки тому

    It reveals why some institutes like MIT are the best.... Because of the professors or Dr like these people....

  • @jerrymahone335
    @jerrymahone335 7 років тому

    you don't have to go abroad to fine currency conversion frictions. just wire money overseas, and you will find the wire conversion is less than the internet money conversion tables and charts. you pay twice once for sending the and the cost for doing business.

  • @jittythomas3130
    @jittythomas3130 10 місяців тому

    The definition of an asset as something that can be expressed as a sequence of cash flows is not to be found elsewhere but in this course. Kindly clarify

  • @TheSpasmer
    @TheSpasmer 2 роки тому

    This China man is a genius. Probably the best tutor on the web.

  • @thelaw3536
    @thelaw3536 5 років тому +2

    Best professor ever! Hope his cancer security does well

  • @lincha3216
    @lincha3216 8 років тому

    An asset is a sequence of cash flows. Simple but...sophisticated to understand.

  • @MrMarket1
    @MrMarket1 6 років тому +17

    Starts at 19:33

  • @proteusindomitus5015
    @proteusindomitus5015 5 років тому +1

    59:16 yeah that's what's in the abstruse lingo of finance called a loan

  • @Anurag_sharma_2_3
    @Anurag_sharma_2_3 8 днів тому

    what a great lecture sir thanks a lot 🙏 MIT its humble request please provide more courses of Finance

  • @mrcookies409
    @mrcookies409 2 роки тому

    Time flies when watching this professor’s lectures. O.o

  • @bighands69
    @bighands69 8 років тому +4

    People benefiting from sub prime is irrelevant. The institutions that offered these services simply could not really afford it at a financial level.
    Most of the institutions that offered such services required government backing. Why not just have the government offer mortgages.

  • @maxmercor5772
    @maxmercor5772 2 роки тому

    I have had lectures and tests about NPV, but I was only taught the formula and that it was used for calculating project feasibility. However the range of its use was never discussed, probably because the lecturer had never used it himself.

  • @jrs7541
    @jrs7541 5 місяців тому

    Hi
    Can someone please explain why $1/$0, $2/$0 is an exchange rate conversion? You are dividing by zero?

  • @GentiliUgo
    @GentiliUgo Місяць тому

    Fron the time t(2008) to the time t(2024), is the value of this lecture bullish or bearish? What about the little box would it have more value today than the one given in the lecture?

  • @JOBGG16
    @JOBGG16 11 років тому

    It is only an approximation, but it still seems to make a usable heuristic. Of course, by determining r(t) more accurately, you could get a more accurate predictions and a more convoluted model, but I doubt it's going to fall into weight since we've made other assumptions along the way.

  • @noonegivesafork6320
    @noonegivesafork6320 6 років тому +1

    To think a decade has passed since this... damn...

  • @geeeeeeee1504
    @geeeeeeee1504 5 місяців тому

    10:25 Seconds he says debters, isn't it lenders, they are the producer's. Right?

  • @vinothamarnath347
    @vinothamarnath347 8 років тому +2

    Why is the professor adding the values of cash flows at different time instants, when he himself clarified earlier, that the value of the asset is a value of a sequence of its present and future cash flows?

    • @thelaw8042
      @thelaw8042 8 років тому +2

      NPV (Net Present Value) is what he does later in the lecture Value of an Asset is tge definition of an assest he states for the class. You are confusing the two.

    • @vinothamarnath347
      @vinothamarnath347 8 років тому +1

      Thanks. Yes, he answers the same question from another student in a subsequent lecture.

  • @奶爸博士经济学
    @奶爸博士经济学 3 роки тому +1

    Very useful content, even for teachers. We are actually giving lecture in English right now

  • @vaishalirama
    @vaishalirama Рік тому

    Currently doing cfa level 1.. this is really helpful

  • @ravindertalwar553
    @ravindertalwar553 2 роки тому +1

    Life is a Wonderful opportunity and journey and it must be Celebrated And Appreciated Happily Hopefully And Abundantly.

  • @wackzingo
    @wackzingo 4 роки тому +1

    The textbook used in this course...
    is.cuni.cz/studium/predmety/index.php?do=download&did=186638&kod=JEM034

  • @Chris-ci8vs
    @Chris-ci8vs 4 роки тому

    Quick note, algorithms cannot be patented, however their transformative applications can be via software patents.
    Also, it wouldn't matter if Coke's formula was found out; they have such an established market share and there is psychological effects on taste people have when even looking at a product.

    • @abhishekravindra4008
      @abhishekravindra4008 3 роки тому

      Maybe there isnt even a secret formula they think is big maybe its just psychological from beginning

  • @junfan02
    @junfan02 Рік тому

    Can cashflows be superadditive? eg: Reputation without any product generates zero cash flow, and vice versa, but taken together they have a positive cashflow.

  • @thefarmersdaughter8235
    @thefarmersdaughter8235 2 роки тому

    They never really cover the homeowners that were evicted from their homes.

  • @turboleggy
    @turboleggy Рік тому

    Why should r be constant? In the (1+r)^t expression

  • @23Gblizzard04
    @23Gblizzard04 11 місяців тому

    Great Lecture Series. I'm hoping to do it all.

  • @endgamefond
    @endgamefond Місяць тому

    I think value doesn't mean value anymore in stock market. Coz it's influenced so hard to know the real value.

  • @scenneasiers
    @scenneasiers Рік тому

    What about Amazon stock? It gives 0 dividends, so 0 cash flows?

  • @Asmodai2011
    @Asmodai2011 3 місяці тому

    Gold must be restored as a monetary stabilizing backer of our paper fiat. This enforces accountability. Defaults are needed to make the math work. It doesnt mean the end of the world, it means short to intermediate pain and restrictiveness.

  • @iamtheman584
    @iamtheman584 6 років тому +3

    Wow this professor is amazing! I am really enjoying this course!! 😊😊

  • @ujjwalpradhan678
    @ujjwalpradhan678 11 років тому +1

    What does it mean by "no friction in currency conversion" under NPV assumptions?

    • @Machoman510
      @Machoman510 9 років тому +1

      That there's no cost to convert.

  • @joydivine4587
    @joydivine4587 3 роки тому

    Thank you Professor🙏 So delightfully concise

  • @hunterrichards2326
    @hunterrichards2326 3 роки тому +2

    My man literally made a dick joke in a finance class. Based.

  • @KraussHelmut
    @KraussHelmut 9 років тому +3

    Excuse me, are the problem sets and solutions available? I can only find exams and exam answers on the MIT OCW page.

    • @mitocw
      @mitocw  9 років тому +2

      +KraussHelmut There are no problem sets available. From the Syllabus: "There are no required problem sets. However, we provide optional problem sets and solutions in the form of the MIT Sloan Finance Problems and Solutions Collection, and the majority of the questions on the midterm and final examinations will be taken verbatim from this document."

    • @BaoTran-cw4fq
      @BaoTran-cw4fq 8 років тому +28

      +KraussHelmut The course actually does have problems and solutions collection, but the professor doesn't post it on the MIT OCW page. However, you can easily find it by googling "the MIT Sloan Finance Problems and Solutions Collection."
      Here are the links to download the collection.
      Part 1: alo.mit.edu/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/PS_Part1.pdf
      Part 2: alo.mit.edu/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/PS_Part2.pdf

    • @Bigtime684
      @Bigtime684 7 років тому

      MIT. Do you have a lecture on project funding?

    • @adnanlimited
      @adnanlimited 6 років тому

      thank you

    • @xtxpxhx
      @xtxpxhx 6 років тому

      bless you

  • @maliklyles5639
    @maliklyles5639 2 роки тому

    what does he mean by "I have a security that pays..." what is a security?

  • @rewolfer
    @rewolfer Рік тому

    It's not only that a dollar today is more useful than a dollar later, but that the dollar is continuously being devalued.

  • @roryboytube
    @roryboytube 6 років тому +5

    Financial valuation = time travel

  • @InvictusPinay
    @InvictusPinay 2 роки тому +1

    This makes me feel like I want to transport to MIT and join this class. Amazing professor! ❤️

  • @prabalkalita6753
    @prabalkalita6753 5 місяців тому

    Struggling with DCF. Its a great lecture

  • @maxfob3899
    @maxfob3899 4 роки тому +1

    Prof. Lo is amazing!