You should try lower settings of Ray tracing. Very high is for sure only playable on the best Nvidia cards. But I think ray tracing medium or low might be at least somewhat playable. Though for AMD cards, Non RT might be the best way to play.
If that was the case they wouldn’t let AMD or intel cards use it lol, but it was made by nvidia and is optimised for nvidia gpus so Yh it works bad on amd
sttuters happen with both radeon or geforce cards sine the game is using UE5 , to get the a good benchmark run you need to make 2 or 3 more runs for all the shaders to cache.
@@Stands01 ever since lord of the fallen 2 you will notice the stutters more frequent and long lasting but in blackmyth the frame time spike is well under control good optimization from science studio, and we are still lacking any FSR3.1 support because the game was founded by nvidia to showcase and alienate amd from ray tracing, the best example is guardian of the galaxy ray tracing implementation letting all brands to do quite well while running under DXR.
Well the game looks good even without RT so no issues. I ve a 4070 Ti with 12700k PC and I benched this with Very High settings + DLSS 75% + FG + Full RT and I get average 62 fps with frame time lag of 20 ms. Sure it was not buttery smooth response but I I think thats the power f Nvidia. With AMD U always can play without RT Y wud any1 even try RT with AMD U paid for a different experience and it delivers
I recommend an old spare ssd 100GB or 200GB and use it as pagefile, set max and minimum to same value. The stutter will be gone. Big game have huge cache file which cause performance issue but pagefile is useful to store the cache file when GPU is streaming through the game wold.
This video made me feel much better, it was exactly what I was looking for before buying. My Pc is a 12700K 32-gigs ram and a RX 7900 XT Thanks for the video. Thumbs up!
The RT effects are nice, but for me it's not worth the performance hit, at least on Radeon cards. I'm getting decent performance in BMW with a 6800xt, but maybe I'll move to 7900xt if I can grab one cheap during Black Friday. Seems to me that 7900xt adds about 30% fps in most games. Thanks for the vid!
The option with 19fps is actually Pathtracing (which is Full Raytracung). Im quite certain the normal settings without „full raytracing“ also include basic raytracing. Try out only changing the „shadow“ option, the fps difference between medium and cinematic is massive, because (I think) very high and cinematic use raytracing for the shadows
i run no ray tracing high on all graphics and cinematic on textures, draw distance, and global illumination. fsr 75% frame gen on am getting 97 average fps at 4k looks and feels great. i have the same system 7950x3d and 7900xt
Fully ray tracing only for 4080 and above man. It's just almost a demo nowadays, no one will accept all the hit in performance. Available hardware still not ready. May be next generation? These promises been revoked since 2018🙂real ray tracing still not playable for most gamers.
It's funny how everyone says ray trscing doesn't matter but now devs are relying on it for shadows like around the leaves and stuff. When turn off makes a shimmering effect with it on that effect is gone and shadows surrounding them are back. So seems like soon ray tracing will be something we want to use. But amd is coming out next gen with some big supposed raytracing uplifts so hopefully it's true for yall amd guys! But even me as an nvidia guy I don't even utilize it much yet but with this game I'm def going to.
yeah yeah, rt so good. Existing for more than 6 years and there's maybe 5 or less games with good rt implementation. Really game changing xD btw did you played any horror with RT? for example resident evill 7 or village? These games look like comedy for 5yo with RT enabled. Also Most RT shadows looks like blurry shit.
@@MacTavish9619honestly all the screen space reflection setting (and others like it) in the past used to reduce performance a lot, but now gpus push 100+ fps with them on, just takes time for it to evolve, it was definitely implemented too early tho and now hardware has to catch up but the prices suck, so we will have to wait and see if ray tracing really becomes a simple setting that everyone will want to use
Why are comparing two completely different implementations of ray tracing? Like wukong ray tracing takes away all of thw shimmering and graphical issues bevause they relied on it. It just increases the lumen and rays they utilized. I'm sry but many games now it changes everything and the next scheduled 8 aaa titles all will include real ray tracing. Not older ray tracing that utilized like 10% of it and was ass. @MacTavish9619
Hi everyone, I have an RX 7900 XT with a Ryzen 5800X3D (Undervolt) @4700MHz, and Gskill DDR4 3800MHz CL18 RAM and I get 10fps more than you on average and without so many drops in those benchmarks. Regards.
Got the 4090 with the AMD Ryzen 9 7950x 4.50 Ghz. I can only get an average of 100 fps with frame generation and full raytracing maxed. Only a average of 59 fps with frame generation off. I'm tempted to tweak it for another 20 fps. lol
i still don't know if i prefer with or without ray tracing , the two seems little different , but none feels more "realistic" from the other to me globally, ...if realism is the purpose of rt .. lol not sure i want to test the benchmark for myself , it's already too hot here
I ve a Gigabyte M28U monitor and I felt very good visual quality with RT ON vs OfF. Like without RT too the game looks beautiful but RT does add that extra spice on top off the already stunning visuals
Even ray tracing low, has better shadows and global illumination than cinematic on those settings without the ray tracing, it’s worth turning it on low if you have a good amd gpu, and turn it to medium on a mid range+ nvidia gpu
Agreed. Honestly I love amd because the prices here have a huge difference. For example, here the difference between a 7900 xt and 4070 ti super can be up to 200 dollars but in the US if the difference is 50-100 dollars its just not worth it. If the difference in price is the same everywhere like in my country, with more than 150 dollar gap or so, there's no reason not to choose amd for all the people on a tighter budget. Also ray tracing is cool but I don't really mind either way
NVIDIA is a lot better with ray tracing; but I included ray tracing for anyone who does have a AMD card and are wondering what ray tracing is like on a AMD GPU in this title.
How about 4070ti getting less fps than 7900xt with RT enabled in games like dying light 2, the witcher 3, resident evil 4 remake and more. Your shitty ngreedia has more fps with RT when RT is made for their gpus only like in cyberpunk (btw how is your 1600$ gpu in 4k getting 16fps with PT? xD)
I have a RX 7900XT and doing some tests I found a really good one. Raden chill + Image sharpeining with Frame Generation OFF. Give it at ry
What's problem with frame generation
You should try lower settings of Ray tracing. Very high is for sure only playable on the best Nvidia cards. But I think ray tracing medium or low might be at least somewhat playable. Though for AMD cards, Non RT might be the best way to play.
The RT is called 'nVidia Full Ray Tracing', it is obviously not for AMD cards.
If that was the case they wouldn’t let AMD or intel cards use it lol, but it was made by nvidia and is optimised for nvidia gpus so Yh it works bad on amd
How did you enable the graph overlay? I can only see numbers
I dont use ray tracing in many games but I cant play this game without it. The game looks so insanely good
Which level of RT do u use with this game ? Which card and how many frames u get
And is that stutter happening with u too ?
sttuters happen with both radeon or geforce cards sine the game is using UE5 , to get the a good benchmark run you need to make 2 or 3 more runs for all the shaders to cache.
@@TheBoltcranck thank you for letting me know about this!
@@Stands01 ever since lord of the fallen 2 you will notice the stutters more frequent and long lasting but in blackmyth the frame time spike is well under control good optimization from science studio, and we are still lacking any FSR3.1 support because the game was founded by nvidia to showcase and alienate amd from ray tracing, the best example is guardian of the galaxy ray tracing implementation letting all brands to do quite well while running under DXR.
Well the game looks good even without RT so no issues. I ve a 4070 Ti with 12700k PC and I benched this with Very High settings + DLSS 75% + FG + Full RT and I get average 62 fps with frame time lag of 20 ms. Sure it was not buttery smooth response but I I think thats the power f Nvidia.
With AMD U always can play without RT Y wud any1 even try RT with AMD U paid for a different experience and it delivers
I recommend an old spare ssd 100GB or 200GB and use it as pagefile, set max and minimum to same value. The stutter will be gone. Big game have huge cache file which cause performance issue but pagefile is useful to store the cache file when GPU is streaming through the game wold.
This video made me feel much better, it was exactly what I was looking for before buying. My Pc is a 12700K 32-gigs ram and a RX 7900 XT Thanks for the video. Thumbs up!
Happy I could help!
The RT effects are nice, but for me it's not worth the performance hit, at least on Radeon cards. I'm getting decent performance in BMW with a 6800xt, but maybe I'll move to 7900xt if I can grab one cheap during Black Friday. Seems to me that 7900xt adds about 30% fps in most games. Thanks for the vid!
What program are you using to get the temperature and frametime values in the top right?
@@Hydra_X9K_Music I am using the AMD Metrics Overlay
@Stands01 Thanks! The UI, font and colors look nice.
@@Hydra_X9K_Music you’re welcome!
The option with 19fps is actually Pathtracing (which is Full Raytracung). Im quite certain the normal settings without „full raytracing“ also include basic raytracing. Try out only changing the „shadow“ option, the fps difference between medium and cinematic is massive, because (I think) very high and cinematic use raytracing for the shadows
i run no ray tracing high on all graphics and cinematic on textures, draw distance, and global illumination. fsr 75% frame gen on am getting 97 average fps at 4k looks and feels great. i have the same system 7950x3d and 7900xt
You want to 7900gre test this game ?
Why does everything look so grainy? Is there any solution for it?
Which is better? 4090 or this?
Can you notice purple in the trees too right my 7900xt has that artifacting while using full ray tracing?
Fully ray tracing only for 4080 and above man. It's just almost a demo nowadays, no one will accept all the hit in performance. Available hardware still not ready. May be next generation? These promises been revoked since 2018🙂real ray tracing still not playable for most gamers.
How is the fps with this graphics 7900 xt on 2k whitouth ray tracing with max settings? Is that those 57 fps? Or i dont get it.
and what's the point of Ray Tracing? I can't see a really big improvement.
the game already looks good without it.
It's funny how everyone says ray trscing doesn't matter but now devs are relying on it for shadows like around the leaves and stuff. When turn off makes a shimmering effect with it on that effect is gone and shadows surrounding them are back. So seems like soon ray tracing will be something we want to use. But amd is coming out next gen with some big supposed raytracing uplifts so hopefully it's true for yall amd guys! But even me as an nvidia guy I don't even utilize it much yet but with this game I'm def going to.
yeah yeah, rt so good. Existing for more than 6 years and there's maybe 5 or less games with good rt implementation. Really game changing xD
btw did you played any horror with RT? for example resident evill 7 or village? These games look like comedy for 5yo with RT enabled. Also Most RT shadows looks like blurry shit.
Yeah RT is only worth it if you have a 4090 I think, my recent GPU purchase was without RT in mind because I know I can't afford a 4090 haha
@@MacTavish9619honestly all the screen space reflection setting (and others like it) in the past used to reduce performance a lot, but now gpus push 100+ fps with them on, just takes time for it to evolve, it was definitely implemented too early tho and now hardware has to catch up but the prices suck, so we will have to wait and see if ray tracing really becomes a simple setting that everyone will want to use
Why are comparing two completely different implementations of ray tracing? Like wukong ray tracing takes away all of thw shimmering and graphical issues bevause they relied on it. It just increases the lumen and rays they utilized. I'm sry but many games now it changes everything and the next scheduled 8 aaa titles all will include real ray tracing. Not older ray tracing that utilized like 10% of it and was ass. @MacTavish9619
@@nikeshpatel7982Thats not true. I have a 4070 ti super and I play on very high ray tracing in wukong
Hi everyone, I have an RX 7900 XT with a Ryzen 5800X3D (Undervolt) @4700MHz, and Gskill DDR4 3800MHz CL18 RAM and I get 10fps more than you on average and without so many drops in those benchmarks. Regards.
You open AMD
AMD HYPR-RX Profiles ?
Got the 4090 with the AMD Ryzen 9 7950x 4.50 Ghz. I can only get an average of 100 fps with frame generation and full raytracing maxed. Only a average of 59 fps with frame generation off. I'm tempted to tweak it for another 20 fps. lol
What happens if i turn on frame gen in game, and go into amd adrenalin and turn on amd fluid motion frames?
Did you not watch the video?
i still don't know if i prefer with or without ray tracing , the two seems little different , but none feels more "realistic" from the other to me globally, ...if realism is the purpose of rt ..
lol not sure i want to test the benchmark for myself , it's already too hot here
Personally for me Ray tracing looks really nice in this game.
I ve a Gigabyte M28U monitor and I felt very good visual quality with RT ON vs OfF.
Like without RT too the game looks beautiful but RT does add that extra spice on top off the already stunning visuals
Even ray tracing low, has better shadows and global illumination than cinematic on those settings without the ray tracing, it’s worth turning it on low if you have a good amd gpu, and turn it to medium on a mid range+ nvidia gpu
yeah, but this does not work when you play the game, does not know why
man ya my buddy has a 4070 and it churns him 75fps with rt and frame gen on amd is still far behind team green with RT
Agreed. Honestly I love amd because the prices here have a huge difference. For example, here the difference between a 7900 xt and 4070 ti super can be up to 200 dollars but in the US if the difference is 50-100 dollars its just not worth it.
If the difference in price is the same everywhere like in my country, with more than 150 dollar gap or so, there's no reason not to choose amd for all the people on a tighter budget. Also ray tracing is cool but I don't really mind either way
Why are you using ray tracing with an AMD card lmfao
NVIDIA is a lot better with ray tracing; but I included ray tracing for anyone who does have a AMD card and are wondering what ray tracing is like on a AMD GPU in this title.
Because the option was there and why not. LULs
How about 4070ti getting less fps than 7900xt with RT enabled in games like dying light 2, the witcher 3, resident evil 4 remake and more. Your shitty ngreedia has more fps with RT when RT is made for their gpus only like in cyberpunk (btw how is your 1600$ gpu in 4k getting 16fps with PT? xD)