J6 - Two-way ANOVA: post-hoc tests

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 23 гру 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 12

  • @alexandrabojanic147
    @alexandrabojanic147 3 місяці тому

    i think that this is the best explanation avaliable on youtube. i was so confused about when you do post hoc because everyone talks about significant interaction and not sig mean eff. THANK U

  • @elastichedgehog6339
    @elastichedgehog6339 4 роки тому +7

    I had to re-teach myself all of this for my master's, Christ. Thank you, this was helpful.

  • @matej5071
    @matej5071 Рік тому +1

    Thank you! This lecture is really helpful. Couldn't find this explanation basically anywhere else on the internet after a 2-hour search.

    • @tommyl3707
      @tommyl3707 Рік тому

      I second this comment. Gonna explore more if your channel

  • @scramah195
    @scramah195 2 роки тому +2

    Quick question at 9:06. You say that there are 8 means, which means that the are 24 potential pairwise comparisons. Isnt this incorrect? Shouldnt there be 7+6+5+4+3+2+1 = 28 comparisons?

  • @Nutricionrealista
    @Nutricionrealista Рік тому

    Thank you so much, so....... if I only have a factor with 2 options ( black or white ) , the pos hoc test it's not recommended cuz the answer it's visible, differences may be in group 1 vs group 2 ( no margins or other factor levels might be involved?) thank u so much

  • @cococnk388
    @cococnk388 2 роки тому

    Thanks for the video.
    I read that when the interaction is significant we cannot interpret the F ratio results of the factors individually ... this means we cannot carry on POST HOC ANALYSIS...?
    your videos says another thing
    Can you help me understand better?

  • @absolutepitcher
    @absolutepitcher 3 роки тому

    Thank you so much. This is really helpful!
    --By a linguistics graduate student

  • @tianyiwang9826
    @tianyiwang9826 5 років тому

    you do a really good job

    • @DarrinLRogers
      @DarrinLRogers  5 років тому +1

      Thank you. These were made to help a class I taught from 2014 to 2016. I know they're pretty dull, but I just needed some material to help the students understand the textbook and lectures. Glad they helped someone else understand :)

  • @rotor.ribbit
    @rotor.ribbit 7 років тому +5

    boi dis confusin