Відео

me encanta este tema!!! y el album "Charango al Sur" es FENOMENAL!!!

Aside from the beauty of the music - he has such nimble and greaceful fingers!

i think that this is the best explanation avaliable on youtube. i was so confused about when you do post hoc because everyone talks about significant interaction and not sig mean eff. THANK U

el maestro es una eminencia y de lo mejor que hay en la interpretacion del charango, pero aqui de flamenco no hay absolutamente nada....

Standard error makes me want to cry :(

Thank you so much this is explained so much better than my current professor and textbook.

Thank you so much, so....... if I only have a factor with 2 options ( black or white ) , the pos hoc test it's not recommended cuz the answer it's visible, differences may be in group 1 vs group 2 ( no margins or other factor levels might be involved?) thank u so much

Thank you! This lecture is really helpful. Couldn't find this explanation basically anywhere else on the internet after a 2-hour search.

Gorgeous. Heading there this May. Which site did you stay at?

Feminist theory is at it's core corrupt and doesn't really belong in psychology. It would be better suited as a political ideology .

Quick question at 9:06. You say that there are 8 means, which means that the are 24 potential pairwise comparisons. Isnt this incorrect? Shouldnt there be 7+6+5+4+3+2+1 = 28 comparisons?

Cool

i don't think this is correct.

Thanks for the video. I read that when the interaction is significant we cannot interpret the F ratio results of the factors individually ... this means we cannot carry on POST HOC ANALYSIS...? your videos says another thing Can you help me understand better?

The background noise in the video was distracting

Nice, thanks :)

Like penny in inspector gadget. Always wanted a laptop in a book. Or like mission impossible when they were at the opera and tech dude was using a paper laptop screen thing

Very good and funny videos bring a great sense of entertainment!

the video image is too poor, you need to fix it more

Do you think the rounding is a bit off at 9:20? I tried to follow along and got a different SD: 3.117 or 3.18

Thank you so much. This is really helpful! --By a linguistics graduate student

I had to re-teach myself all of this for my master's, Christ. Thank you, this was helpful.

✍️

The only reason why I watched this video: to learn what an "OMNIBUS-Test" is. It is in the title but NOT MENTIONED ONCE in the entire video.

It's amazing! Do you have any documentation of this? Would love to see what you've done in detail!

you do a really good job

Great!!!

The audio cuts in and out around 12:00 minutes. But I like your explanations. Very easy to understand.

very useful! thanks

boi dis confusin

I have a naive question: Why between-groups variation, but not the total variation?

Thank you man :)

8:43 The mean of group A does not appear to 3.5 with those values. This looks like a mistake. The mean is 6 and the variance 5.6.

video helps me a lot. thank you ^.^

Thank you professor!

I'm going to get that doughnut.

You're supposed to put stress on the first syllable. It's "ghow-ss." Also, Gauss was German.

Your audio cuts out at 9:04.

video seems to be cut-off