Yeah but it'd still be ridiculous to expect a human to reach those levels of might. Their muscles are not only far more of their body, but also just far stronger in general. There are humans walking around with almost no body fat and they'd have the same nightmare against one of these animals. If I lost some fat I would be able to last a couple more seconds running before I got caught, but the fight would go the same. They're made of different stuff.
Look most things in the chest. It is why those of us with Autism have issues with eye contact. Because of our slightly differently formed brains, we run much more on instinct, similar to the critters you saw here. Eye contact in nature is a challenge pose. If you do it, you WILL get challenged back. PS... in the strength, speed and agility games, humans are in the bottom half. If you challenge, you will lose, and that is just how it works. Most animals you can turn away from... but the problem is you will almost always start to run. It is instinct. Backing away you are forced to be more careful, attentive and generally just don't look like you need killed.
That probably explains why when I make too much eye contact, I feel like I'm intimidating then. Especially if they're kids. Seriously, it's so funny how unnatural we find eye contact to the point that some of us end up masking and timing how long to look or look away. That reminded me when Hasanabi took this autism test on stream and was like, "who thinks eye contact is normal???" And then proceeded to describe how he masks to make eye contact so he's socially normal lmao.
Actually most people if they're taught how to survive an animal attack they're going to do what they were taught because that's how survival instincts work
It depends. If it's drilled into your muscle memory in training situations involving actual simulation of the fear levels, then yeah that's possible. If you just watched a youtube video and then moved on? I'd say no that's not how it's going to work at all, you're just going to do whatever your instinct dictates you react to conflict like, which varies from person to person but in the situations covered here it's a choice of damnations. Fight, flight or freeze is what you're looking at. Stop to think back to an instruction? Great if you can manage it, but you're gonna have to have a rare level of wherewithall to do it quick enough. I trained in martial arts for years and yet every single time when I actually got attacked by a person, by the time any of that knowledge kicked in I was already half knocked-out. And that's humans, who could understand me, aren't three times as big as me and ten times as muscular, and don't have the bite force of a planetary headbutt. It is still good to know but it is dumb to predict. For every tale you hear of someone successfully applying survival advice there are going to be a lot more people who didn't live to tell the opposite tale. Not a thing you want to be expecting or relying upon. I'd probably freeze up, as that tends to be what happens in fights, and that's like, the worst instinct you can have, unlucky me I guess. Beyond that I tend to fight back, which is the second-worst. I'd die for sure.
@@Torthrodhel No this is false information. You do not need to go threw simulated scenarios to effectively use information you know. Survival instincts will bring such knowledge to the surface of your mind.
@@zackstoner4523 have you been attacked? I've been attacked and found that I did not behave how I thought I would, nor how I had researched and knew was better, nor even how I had trained to. The training tends to kick in very late. Instincts take over until then and my instincts, like a lot of people, are quite unideal. I tend to freeze, and I tend to stand my ground and fight back - both usually stupid ideas. I know this, and it still happens that way. I see a lot of people saying they know how they'd react, but in my personal experience and via knowing plenty of others who have faced danger and also behaved nothing like they thought they would, it seems to me to be common. Common, that even trained scenarios are no big guarantee, just a bit of a nudge in the right direction... and that not even training but only researching without practice, usually means nothing at all. That's all circumstantial evidence based on a very low sample size, of course (as is anyone's personal experience). I don't really see what would set me apart from the norm, but at the same time I know that's always a possibility with this sort of thing. I'd be interested to know from what data you're asserting the opposite? What are you basing that on? Do you have your own set of experiences that disagree?
@@Torthrodhel I have been attacked by hogs and dogs. I have been attacked by humans. I have knifes put to my throat. I have drowned 2 times. I have ran into burning building to check for people. Im my experiences all prudent information is recalled instantly.
@@zackstoner4523 wow, that's a lot. There must be quite an extreme potential of difference from one person to the next, then. You're naturally good in such situations, whereas I am naturally bad in them. That's the only thing that makes sense I think? Sorry to know you had to go through all that btw.
Probably with hippos the long tusks are gonna do the damage (2 ft long), but i’ve seen them crushing water melons easily with the ”softer” part or their mouth. Could probably do the same to a skull. So i’m sure they have a crazy bite force
Reason why some big animals are so strong and fast is because they have more muscle than fat on them.
Just like marvel's kingpin "Approximately 2% of my body mass is fat. Allow me to show you what 350 pounds of muscle is capable of"
@@deadplthebadass21 I read that in his voice-
@@Pastamist Nice
Yeah but it'd still be ridiculous to expect a human to reach those levels of might. Their muscles are not only far more of their body, but also just far stronger in general. There are humans walking around with almost no body fat and they'd have the same nightmare against one of these animals. If I lost some fat I would be able to last a couple more seconds running before I got caught, but the fight would go the same. They're made of different stuff.
Yeah. They think hippos are cute, tiny ears and fat. *Dude* the are TANKS!
1:17 that’s what she said 😂
If u turn your back on your mom its disrespect so same for them
😂😂😂😂 fax
If I did that to my mama I rather take an elephant attack than my mother 😂
@@SMGANG I debunked that casual geographic fraud lol
@@theemperorofbeasts5952wdym, he's casual geographic for a reason
Fair enough.
Smaller animals are usually more dangerous because they got to defend themselves better from predators
FACTSSS
Look most things in the chest. It is why those of us with Autism have issues with eye contact. Because of our slightly differently formed brains, we run much more on instinct, similar to the critters you saw here. Eye contact in nature is a challenge pose. If you do it, you WILL get challenged back. PS... in the strength, speed and agility games, humans are in the bottom half. If you challenge, you will lose, and that is just how it works. Most animals you can turn away from... but the problem is you will almost always start to run. It is instinct. Backing away you are forced to be more careful, attentive and generally just don't look like you need killed.
That probably explains why when I make too much eye contact, I feel like I'm intimidating then. Especially if they're kids. Seriously, it's so funny how unnatural we find eye contact to the point that some of us end up masking and timing how long to look or look away.
That reminded me when Hasanabi took this autism test on stream and was like, "who thinks eye contact is normal???" And then proceeded to describe how he masks to make eye contact so he's socially normal lmao.
Actually most people if they're taught how to survive an animal attack they're going to do what they were taught because that's how survival instincts work
It depends. If it's drilled into your muscle memory in training situations involving actual simulation of the fear levels, then yeah that's possible. If you just watched a youtube video and then moved on? I'd say no that's not how it's going to work at all, you're just going to do whatever your instinct dictates you react to conflict like, which varies from person to person but in the situations covered here it's a choice of damnations. Fight, flight or freeze is what you're looking at. Stop to think back to an instruction? Great if you can manage it, but you're gonna have to have a rare level of wherewithall to do it quick enough. I trained in martial arts for years and yet every single time when I actually got attacked by a person, by the time any of that knowledge kicked in I was already half knocked-out. And that's humans, who could understand me, aren't three times as big as me and ten times as muscular, and don't have the bite force of a planetary headbutt.
It is still good to know but it is dumb to predict. For every tale you hear of someone successfully applying survival advice there are going to be a lot more people who didn't live to tell the opposite tale. Not a thing you want to be expecting or relying upon. I'd probably freeze up, as that tends to be what happens in fights, and that's like, the worst instinct you can have, unlucky me I guess. Beyond that I tend to fight back, which is the second-worst. I'd die for sure.
@@Torthrodhel No this is false information. You do not need to go threw simulated scenarios to effectively use information you know. Survival instincts will bring such knowledge to the surface of your mind.
@@zackstoner4523 have you been attacked? I've been attacked and found that I did not behave how I thought I would, nor how I had researched and knew was better, nor even how I had trained to. The training tends to kick in very late. Instincts take over until then and my instincts, like a lot of people, are quite unideal. I tend to freeze, and I tend to stand my ground and fight back - both usually stupid ideas. I know this, and it still happens that way.
I see a lot of people saying they know how they'd react, but in my personal experience and via knowing plenty of others who have faced danger and also behaved nothing like they thought they would, it seems to me to be common. Common, that even trained scenarios are no big guarantee, just a bit of a nudge in the right direction... and that not even training but only researching without practice, usually means nothing at all.
That's all circumstantial evidence based on a very low sample size, of course (as is anyone's personal experience). I don't really see what would set me apart from the norm, but at the same time I know that's always a possibility with this sort of thing.
I'd be interested to know from what data you're asserting the opposite? What are you basing that on? Do you have your own set of experiences that disagree?
@@Torthrodhel I have been attacked by hogs and dogs. I have been attacked by humans. I have knifes put to my throat. I have drowned 2 times. I have ran into burning building to check for people. Im my experiences all prudent information is recalled instantly.
@@zackstoner4523 wow, that's a lot. There must be quite an extreme potential of difference from one person to the next, then. You're naturally good in such situations, whereas I am naturally bad in them. That's the only thing that makes sense I think? Sorry to know you had to go through all that btw.
Most of that size is muscle, bears are ripped and can sprint ridiculously fast.
Probably with hippos the long tusks are gonna do the damage (2 ft long), but i’ve seen them crushing water melons easily with the ”softer” part or their mouth. Could probably do the same to a skull. So i’m sure they have a crazy bite force
13000 lbs is 6 and a half tons
Simple don’t be a fool learn how to focus better and boom your chances of living are higher
react to iShowspeed getting freaky with Ava and regret it 😂pls
React to shordie shordie under 51 seconds
Dthang- scenes
350 pounds isn't normal