Inside the Troconis Trial: Feb. 23, 2024 - Interrogation tactics testimony
Вставка
- Опубліковано 16 жов 2024
- Visit www.nbcconnect... for the latest in news, weather, entertainment, sports and other great content.
Continuing coverage of the trial can be found here: www.nbcconnect...
NBC CT Facebook / nbcconnecticut
NBC CT Instagram / nbcconnecticut
#nbc #nbcconnecticut #ConnectingYou #nbcct
![[UA] NAVI vs MOUZ | BO5 | IEM Rio 2024](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/CMBYk0cbGoA/mqdefault.jpg)
Neither Michelle or Fotus seemed alarmed that the mother of five was gone. He suggested she probably "ran away" and neither of them displayed concern that someone may have harmed or abducted her. Why? Because they both knew damn well she was dead.
Both of them not only conspired but participated in Jennifer's death
No one can prove that she’s dead. Nobody knows the truth and to condemn somebody especially when you don’t know the truth it’s not right.
@@Dove225she didn’t just “disappear” like FD and MT would have you believe. She adored her children. Why would she leave them motherless? Seems to me you haven’t looked very carefully at all the evidence. Circumstantial evidence is not worthless evidence. It just takes some common sense to put all together. Maybe MT didn’t conspire to kill her, but JD is definitely deceased and was brutally murdered by her sick, narcissistic husband. MT helped to get rid of evidence, whether she consciously did it or not. Hard to believe that she didn’t ask more questions based on his behavior the day of the murder. I don’t think this jury has enough evidence to convict her, but she definitely knew more than she is admitting. Again, common sense.
Exactly. He couldn’t hide the “glee” in his voice, when speaking to the Attorney that was in charge of the children’s custody/visitation the day Jennifer went missing.
Exactly , 100%.
That was the first give away .
Who writes out a time line of their day???
Well Michelle was the one with miss information, untruth information .
It never stopped Michelle from saying, Jennifer should be buried beside the dog.
Michelle said also said , That bitch was destroying Michelle’s life, over the children’s custody case, it had nothing to do with Michelle, the children weren’t not allowed to go near Michelle
Fotus threaten Jennifer , he would take the kids away to Greece.
Who in their right mind fires up a fireplace and go back and forth several times, and the fires were consistent with their goings and comings. They appear to be burning evidence.
And she forgot to tell anyone about traveling back and forth and the fires multiple times, thereafter.
That one is difficult to explain.
Yes and I don’t light fires when I’m really hot and I’m in the middle of cleaning. I’d just dump my rubbish in the plentiful garbage bags lying around.
looks like they burned the body
And this was in late May 🔥
If i was on the jury i would feel like the defense was insulting my intelligence with the 2 'experts' they put on the stand!
No kidding , they were useless, What did the specialist bring to the courtroom?
I’m not sure why they brought in any witness’s. Also…. Not sure what this memory person was proving! Did fotis convince her and create lies as fact or did the police! ? She started out lying…. So it doesn’t do much for her interrogations. They didn’t pressure her into lying…. It’s how she started.
The defense has nothing to defend her actions. They are grasping at straws.
Luckily, you are not a juror.
I hope the jury sees through all the lies
The fact that MT was in the company of FD, while he drove around with bloodied objects that have Jennifer's DNA, mostly blood, and she helped clean up and purchased cleaning products, and driving to and from one home to another; makes it appear that she knew more than she revealed during those interviews.
If she's got those documents on her lab top and wanted them to be seen tells me she was very much part of the planning or murder and everything that goes with it and she was always aware of everything fodumbass was up to what he had didn't have who what when and where the same applies to knowing all on Jennifer
No doubt.
Still doesn’t prove her guilt. That’s speculation. It’s not about our feelings about what she might’ve known or done. Facts and evidence is the only thing that rly matters
@@rak7293DNA will convict her on at least 2 of 3 charges. Conspiracy will be whether the jury has the balls to do the right thing. She’s a HUGE reason Jennifer is gone.
I love the judge in this case, his reason for taking a recess was to get the lawyer and the expert to stop their hostility towards each other. They were getting unhinged!
He should rule the world !
Truth. Witness was confrontational. and The Professor statement she is a distinguished professor turned me off. She definitely was full of herself. Sad because on the case Brian Poole was spot on. In a Catholic school student Simone and the class was asked to answer questions on the Memory Expert Elizabeth Loftus.
“My understanding of Elizabeth Loftus's misinformation effect paradigm theory is where exposure to new possible inaccurate information may negatively affect your memory by making you falsely remember an event.
2. How did Elizabeth Loftus apply her theory in the second video to explain how
Jennifer could not identify the correct attacker in the courtroom, Brian Poole, and how Jennifer chose Ronald Cotton as the person who assaulted her?
Loftus applies her theory in the second video, to explain how Jennifer could not identify the correct attacker in the courtroom, Brian Poole, and how Jennifer chose Ronald Cotton as the person who assaulted her. She goes into detail about how once Jennifer kept picking Cotton through pictures and in the lineup, it duped her memory into thinking that he was really her rapist. Since Poole was not a suspect in the photos and the lineup, she thought one of them did it to her and picked the most similar one.
3. In the second video and in the Preserving Eyewitness Memory case comparison above, various strategies were described that could improve the accuracy of a testimony. Describe two of the ways to decrease eyewitness misidentification and increase access to a more accurate memory.
In the second video, they discuss two of the ways to decrease eyewitness
• misidentification and increase access to a more accurate memory. One improvement is to show each picture one at a time, instead of all at once, so the person is not comparing the suspects to one another, but to their memory of the real one. The second improvement is that the police officers no longer congratulate the eyewitness if they match the person they picked in the line up to the person they picked from the photos. Now they say nothing, and instead ask about what they remember from the scene. This is because the reinforcement confirms it was the right choice for the eyewitness, which could lead to inaccurate identification.
My understanding of Elizabeth Loftus's misinformation effect paradigm theory is where exposure to new possible inaccurate information may negatively affect your memory by making you falsely remember an event.
2. How did Elizabeth Loftus apply her theory in the second video to explain how
Jennifer could not identify the correct attacker in the courtroom, Brian Poole, and how Jennifer chose Ronald Cotton as the person who assaulted her?
Loftus applies her theory in the second video, to explain how Jennifer could not identify the correct attacker in the courtroom, Brian Poole, and how Jennifer chose Ronald Cotton as the person who assaulted her. She goes into detail about how once Jennifer kept picking Cotton through pictures and in the lineup, it duped her memory into thinking that he was really her rapist. Since Poole was not a suspect in the photos and the lineup, she thought one of them did it to her and picked the most similar one.
3. In the second video and in the Preserving Eyewitness Memory case comparison above, various strategies were described that could improve the accuracy of a testimony. Describe two of the ways to decrease eyewitness misidentification and increase access to a more accurate memory.
In the second video, they discuss two of the ways to decrease eyewitness
• misidentification and increase access to a more accurate memory. One improvement is to show each picture one at a time, instead of all at once, so the person is not comparing the suspects to one another, but to their memory of the real one. The second improvement is that the police officers no longer congratulate the eyewitness if they match the person they picked in the line up to the person they picked from the photos. Now they say nothing, and instead ask about what they remember from the scene. This is because the reinforcement confirms it was the right choice for the eyewitness, which could lead to inaccurate identification.”
Elizabeth Loftus did not meet her standards on her memory theory in this case. Additionally, Elizabeth Loftus arrogant answers proved she was being bias. Which leading to an unhinged examination by the prosecutor. Elizabeth Loftus expertise was a failure to her work. Elizabeth Loftus snarky attitude was disrespectful to the defense and prosecution. Which did not help Michelle Troconis. Elizabeth Loftus starting “unpopular” people only proved she was the problem. Failing to do her job and had no notes of her own that she could have brought into court. Memory expert that had memory issues herself indeed was a joke.
She said she had fires frequently but denied there was a fire when she was not home, back and forth. Liar liar pants on fire.🇺🇸⚖️🔥
Starting the fireplace is not easy and needs so many times cleaning If I have to go out and back in why do I start a fire???? I would wait until I get home 🤷♀️
@@sibelc.380
🧩🤔🔥Surely there’s a logical explanation, maybe she’s a closet smoker.🚬The police reported the fire boxes were all empty and clean when they initially investigated the home.
My dad has fires on all yr long. Even summertime. Did the detectives check if they often had fires ? No. They assumed. Have they proved she was burning evidence? Again no. It’s assumption based on nothing.
@@sibelc.380 depends what type of fire place you’re using. So again there’s fire places that lights up very easy . So again there’s no evidence here. It’s all based on detective kipples tunnel vision on bringing anyone down now Fotis was dead. He’s a very bad detective and way too cocky for a detective.
Her bestie, the final witness, testified that oh yes, there would be fires burning in that home year round, guests gathered around the hearth, relaxing and sipping wine. Well, there were no friends, no family members enjoying a relaxing afternoon around a fire in the Dulos home, day of the murder, May 24th. There was but one person enjoying that fire: cleaner upper Michelle Troconis.
Not only custody was Fotis problem but also money...
Yes, as soon as Fotis lost the $2.5 million lawsuit with Mrs. Farber, when the court determined said amount was a loan and not a gift, Fotis had deep financial problems. I’m sure this angered him beyond measure.
And Jennifer did say - he must win at all cost
Always follow the money 💰
I'm sure getting Jennifer out of the way would give him control over there childrens money which he needed and wanted. Fotis was on to his next sugar momma, Anna Curry when he died
Especially money!
I can't believe she had that custody report on her laptop...HOW DARE SHE?!!! She should be locked up just for that!
How dareeeee!!!it seems intentional
She’s as sinister as hell. And not too bright.
MT is definitely involved.
Without a doubt .
She lied. I don’t think the evidence is strong for conspiracy to commit but the other charges definitely.
@@mauiswift6391judge said specifically that jury can consider Michelles comment about Jennifer should be buried next to the dog as conspiracy and that is what defense could NOT get acquittal on that charge, let alone any of the 6 charges, 35 pages of evidence is a lot to prove beyond reasonable doubt
So an expert witness is blabbing her testimony b4 the end of court? How expert of her.
I know I would not be at the beauty salon getting my hair colored when my boyfriend’s wife is missing and 5 children are wondering where mommy is. 🥲🥲🥲I’d be frantic. No EXCUSES !
Unbelievable !!!!
💯
I agree- those five kids were her potential step children!
At first I was on the fence about MT, but then her lack of emotion struck me in the face. Did she grieve because she was dating a father of FIVE children who needed his attention? Did she grieve because FIVE children lost their mother forever? Did she grieve because her icky boyfriend’s wife disappeared and was presumed dead? Did she grieve because of what she was and is putting her teenage daughter through with all the drama? Did she grieve when FD cowardly offed himself and left her holding the bag? Did she grieve for trying to set up their employee who owned the red Tacoma truck? I haven’t seen any evidence of remorse, sadness, grief, hopelessness, etc. If I were in her shoes I’d be an inconsolable puddle of tears, but I don’t have ice water running through my veins. She might very well be an evil monster just like FD. So yeah if was sitting on that jury I’d have to vote guilty. Maybe she cries all the time behind closed doors but sheesh woman!
Yes MT only cried in court was for herself when they were playing video of detectives interviews and yesterday end court and made sure her hair was not blocking her face this only time so jurors can see her crying narcissist.
MT is as Evil as Fitos
Attorney’s tell clients to show 0 emotions… I’d be sobbing if innocent
Agree. I think sadly she feels she is the victim here.
@@Lisa_leelee She is the the Criminal not the victim
Even though I really like the Fulos family lawyer, I find it incredibly hard to imagine not to mention impractical that a court would take 5 young children off a kind loving stay at home mother who is not incapacitated in any way and award full custody to a man who supposedly works 5 days a week and goes away excessively for his competition sport.
Fotis painted Jennifer as mentally incompetent, as all good narcissists do
She is absolutely involved
I like this wording……so much missing info, but how could she not be!
Excellent police work.
@@realresident1890so much missing information is the operative term. Not guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. She was about to move away from him from testimony (not debated in cross), this is not a motivated person who wants Fotis all for herself. As usual sloppy aggressive police work as well. I’m not fan of criminals or murder of course. I am against overcharging and manipulation during police investigations
@@unclefreddy2009why was she lying to the detectives so much if she wasn't covering anything up? She never gave any other reason.
@@tarynisazombie only one thing I recall being a “lie” and that was the shower situation. (don’t forget they were endlessly lying to her and distorting everything for hours and hours with a non native speaker - cognitive overload is real I have direct experience here). Totally strange I agree and perhaps there is involvement - it’s hard to decide- but the murder charge?
@@unclefreddy2009 why lie about the fires? And about all the trips she made to the other house and random trash cans and the car wash? But mainly, why did she as a quite jealous girlfriend never even ask or care where fotis was all morning? Didn't even question him after she found out that Jennifer was missing? Never questioned him at all about where he really was. Not how a jealous girlfriend acts and not how she normally acted
When you throw away bloody clothing of your ex-wife, I don’t think any evidence about the custody of the children matter. It seems as though his guilt is evident.
He is dead and is not on trial and for sure the evidence appears he is guilty. It’s also not what this trial is about.
@@unclefreddy2009 They must prove Fodus killed her in order for Michelle to be complicit. They are trying to say Fodus didn’t kill Jennifer because he was anticipating a positive custodial arrangement but that is not really relevant after proving he had her bloody clothing.
@@unclefreddy2009he had a partner who wanted her gone.
Yes his guilt. Not MT and that’s sadly what has happened here Mt is getting the guilt of FD put on to her.
@@rak7293 She was in on it.
I Think was was Involved.and she knows Everything. I Vote Guilty.Who runs around town with somebody dumping stuff in Different places.Putting stuff in Storage Drains.
Plus Michelle's DNA was on the outside of the bag with Jennifer's blood evidence to me that right there sealed the deal. Everything else just supports it. That's why the police have a 35 page indictment in the trial took so long. Look how short the defenses and how weak
Exactly. Especially a contractor who you would think has access to construction garbage receptacles. And if he's the top dog, then you wouldn't expect him to be removing trash himself.
I hope the jury comes back soon with a verdict...after closing arguments Tuesday.Guilty.
😢💔Thank you, yes this is all about JUSTICE FOR JENNIFER 😢💔 - And her Mother, Five Children 💔💔😪💔💔💔 and Friends! 🙏 RIP Jennifer 😇
I have never seen a defendant try to "hide" themselves from the jury. She wore beige everyday (to match her hair?) and had her hair covering her view of the jury. Never seen a defense attorney ignore the jury when they enter the courtroom, either. Not a good look people, not a good look. Disrespecting the jury is really stupid!
Her attorneys were the bottom of the barrel and I'm hoping for a guilty verdict.
Ditto 💯
I wonder what excuse Michelle told her daughter when she blew off her daughter’s school event to go drive around Hartford with Fotis? A truly loving mother doesn’t skip a child’s school play to hang out with their boyfriend!
They chose that day as her daughter would be out of the way, in school from early morning until ~9pm. And I think Nicole spent the night, had a sleepover at someone else's home that night, after the play.
I think the tears from MT was for the huge bill paid to the "memory expert" after watching her crash and burn.
The witness is a disappointment to the scientific community. She completely missed the point - if MT was fed mis information how would she have "remembered" the shower and that she didn't see the phone, etc. She remembered the truth later after she got called out for lying. The witness totally discredited herself especially with that stunt on the court steps afterward. Totally biased.
Exactly, we're meant to believe that MT "remembered" the narrative she was supposedly fed but couldn't remember any actual truths
The truth will never change, in English and Spanish. The truth remains!!
So Traconis just “happened” to be buying wood. She had better like prison food.
The expert of memory but her answer to the prosecution was most of the time can’t remember 😅
That's the way how she played her part to support the defendant .
@@aunghtay6268good point, but she was asked abt Ted Bundy, she remembers a case sharply that took place 50 years ago, but not something so important like work accomplishments that she did 30 years ago.
Dont be deliberately slow, people, she didnt claim she has a photographic memory, or that she - or any human -has perfect recall. She actually claims the opposite. She says that memory is not very good and can be influenced by many things. And, actually, her testimony and memory issues are yet another example that this is the case.
Try to keep up, mmmm'kay.
The memory expert that didn’t remember anything 😂🤦🏻♀️
She doesn’t think Michelle is unpopular? really!
Haha good one
...who is Michelle??? :)))))
@@rode5927exactly,
Michelle who ????
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂, she would.
She could be smart but Michelle did the dumbest thing ever .
What made Fotus & Michelle think they could ever get away with this murder.
Cells phones will always trace you tracks, you vehicle will always trace where you went.
Cameras in every corner these days.
Throwing trash in the garbage, that belongs to Jennifer .
They weren’t thinking this out.
I hope Michelle doesn’t think she is not guilty.
I believe she was the instigator of this murder.
It’s not a popularity contest. This is a trial. Personal feelings about her or anyone in this trial is irrelevant and that’s not how the jury gets to make decisions on her being guilty or not. This popularity contests among grown adults in the comment sections are so juvenile and idiotic tbh. It shows lack of understanding of the law.
What's the difference if police lied to MT, to maybe get her to speak what she knows, because if she speaks the truth, it shouldn't matter what the police throws at her.
I first believed her reaction when they said the garbage bags contained Jennifer's belongings.. but I think she was more upset that he lied to her and was probably using her as an alibi more than Jennifer was dead and she was dating a murderer
@@Dani-ICU-RNI feel like her reaction was more of an “oh crap, we’re caught, how do I get out of this” sentiment.
I agree, and her lawyer was there to protest if needed
So, all criminals suffer memory loss. This is absurd.
Where did the defence drag that expert out of?
I don't know, but the prosecution sure drug her through the mud!
The defence can't remember
A dementia home.
all those trips she made to "burn something" that is very suspicious.
Same! It creeped me out, starting fires in the fireplace for warmth takes a while. Who the heck does it while they’re in the middle of something else, running back and forth doing things?! That confirmed it for me, without a shadow of a doubt
even more shocking: the fire on video was never before or after "that day"
I’d agree, she probably was burning the paper towels, which would be difficult to find after the fire was done.
And never thought to mention that to anybody when asked about her timeline!
And that Instagram post when she said she was naked that when she burned her clothes and what about those two making out in that truck where jennifer had been
She cries bc she will be sentenced for contempt of court for leaking that legal document on custody yesterday. It's always about her.
But the truth never changes.
Life in Prison.
Shes way involved!!!!!
How can anyone have inconsistencies with their memory when it was just a normal easy breezy day going to the shops and taking some photos. Nothing odd or illegal happened on that Friday at all did it? The lady on the stand is correct that people can have memory issues. Remembering things that didn’t happen is really hard. The funny thing is that if Michelle has a shower every morning with Fotis, then I would think not having a shower with him that day and him not even being there in morning would actually stick out in your mind more pronounced than not. That would be the one thing that you would remember.
Especially wen ur lying. Hence the inconsistencies
@@ruthmyers2397exactly. 🌟
One day, after i left for work (i didnt lock the front door), a drunk man came stumbling into our bungalow and my dog and bf were suddenly awakened by an intruder and my bf jumped out of bed and shoved the obviously drunk, unsteady man backward, out the front door and he landed on his bottom. He was so drunk, he thought he was on the other side of town at his friend's house (so he told police).
So, i was at work when this happened and yet i have what, to me, is a vivid memory of it (as tho i were standing in the livingroom, watching the door). I recall seeing the dog fly off the bed and run to the man, barking and nipping at his hands, and my bf yelling "What are you doing!?" and forcefully shoving him out the front door and him tripping backward a couple times and landing on his butt. I can see the man and i can see his face in my mind's eye but I WASNT THERE.
I am baffled by this cuz i absolutely was not there and i still i have this crazy detailed and vivid memory of it.
I always knew humans were poor eyewitnesses but now, i dont trust anything i think ive remembered. Most of the time, its not an issue cuz nothing happens but i absolutely would not agree to be an eyewitness knowing my mind fabricated an entire memory. I cant explain it, its insane.
The only thing i can think is that the thought of the event frightened me so much that, as he told me what happened, my brain stored it and recalls it as if it were a video- as opposed to remembering it in bullet-point format. I know of myself that if you say (speak) a phone number to me, ill never recall it, but if you write it down and i look at it, or if i dial it in my phone, i can recall it for years. I see, in my mind, the image of it written down, or the pattern of how it is dialed sticks in my mind (tho not the numbers themselves if i dial it, just the pattern). Maybe my brain made a visual representation of it cuz it was traumatic (what if i was there, what if he was there for more nefarious reasons? etc etc).
Anyways, i write down everything important (if i witness an event etc) immediately, if it is an even i may/must recall for later, and i strictly only trust that immediate documentation, not my memory of it later. That way i try to avoid my mind creating events, or mis-remembering.
Have you ever had this happen?
It is never good to interfere in anyone's marriage--regardless of the state of that union.
That memory expert could not remember a lot of information
Even the name of her first Book
Guilty! Jennifer my heart breaks for the loss of a wonderful mom. Infidelity to the extreme, the irony he killed himself but left his accomplice to face the charges. I pray the jury see through the torture Jennifer endured for years prior to her murder, to keep her children and family safe.
Duh..motive was annoying, jealous girlfriend.
Body Language can say a whole lot more than transcripts can about truthfulness !
She is guilty as hell !!’ Liar liar
11:06 her science... thats exactly right
They follow the money pattern and JF money was their target: FD followed JF money, divorce attorney followed her money, defense attorney follows her money, MT the mistress followed her money. JF has paid the bill for all of them. Chimney smoking the 24., burning parts of the crime: smoking never before or later and MT lies about it. Defense attorney questioning Mrs GF mother of JF mother of 5: he has shown again and again his own disgraceful and disgusting tone. His own narcissism will destroy his career. Overwhelming Karma will bring justice for JF mother of 5. Period. Rob.
According to her, interrogators are up the creek.
GUILTY AND SHE KNOWS IT SO DOES AUSTRALIA AND USA 🇺🇸 RIP JENNIFER JUSTICE FOR JENNIFER oh and she forgot to mention sorry i don’t speak English what a joke she is a liar and deceptive just in that
Lies, lies and lies…. A life full of lies ever since she became the other woman is obvious she had to lie her way around. Now those lies are coming back to bite her. Guilty, if I were the juror.
Exactly, MT founded their relationship on deceit and lies from the very beginning, as she was having an affair with FD while he was still married and living with Jennifer, which is why JD left and filed for divorce
It surprises me she isn't wearing the orange jumpsuit she belongs in.
That Orange Jumpsuit is coming next week
@@deborahdixon863not necessarily, if she appeals she could bond out.
I've never seen a televised trial where you cant see the defendents face. Wth!
I hope the jury knows she is guilty
Why is this trial taking so long? Is it the court process in CT? Is it the type of evidence (or lack thereof)? Seems even more complex trials have moved much faster.
It’s a complicated case. The isn’t evidence tangible.
The defense spent ridiculous amounts of time on ridiculous questions. He asked the children's visitation supervisor about bread and cake for nearly an hour.
First they had to prove FD 's guilt and then show the court that they were together
Why is she in front of the media as an expert witness? She needs her additional 15 minutes of fame. I wonder if she’s billing for the time to speak to the media lol😅
as shown in the video: prosecutor questioning her taking 600-700 USD per hour...., count the hours...., it seems 14...
Guilty.
This guest has a very unbiased view..thank you
$600 an hour !
He's great, I can't stand the legal expert who is shilling for the defense and speaks of MT as if she's a "family woman", yeah another woman's family.
@@ppw2393 you read my mind thank youuuu
It is incredible that in the US, it is allowed for the police to lie int hese interviews.
If the Police said to You :
" We have your DNA on a Dead body " !!
What would your Reply be ?
If your Innocent what do their Lies mean , but if your Guilty you might think Sh*t they got me and fess Up ! Its called: Psychology not Lies ! 🤔
I believe in God i hope we get som
e closure for Jennifer parents and her kids
The pitchfork crowd that we see in the comment sections are thankfully not on the jury. They cannot separate their own opinions from facts. If we like the defendant the attorneys or experts is irrelevant as it’s the facts and evidence that matters. That’s why this seems like a rush to pin the murder on anyone around the actual murderer who’s no longer around. The state doesn’t have concrete evidence to send her down. Detective Kipple fked this up as he got tunnel vision on MT. Now who’ll be left behind is JF family who always was dragged through this farce of a trial.
Blah blah blah
For$ 600 an hour i can make up some excuses to sell to jury.anybody can be an expert.
Trying to confuse some of the jurors.
Dude looks just like a successful matrimonial attorney should look.
Eventually it comes around.
Viorica Marian, a psychologist and professor at Northwestern University, told jurors that what the interviews could have shown was a “miscommunication” between Troconis and investigators, which could have resulted in Troconis giving different information to investigators at different times.
This expert didn’t even bother on watching MT interrogation videos, but she was called as a witness. A witness of what?
She new it was fed ex envelope, so she had to know it was being dumped down that drain
Noatter what Michelle should not have cooperated and demanded a lawyer. These cops are jerks.
She had her lawyer sitting next to her every. single. interview. Clearly you haven't watched the trial. And at anytime she could have refused to speak with them. She was told that was her right but she chose otherwise 'cause she's smarter than them 🙄
The defense's memory expert, regardless of her knowledge, was the worse expert I've ever witnessed having served as an expert for over 20 years. She made zero attempt to apply her "expertise" specifically to the defendant, Ms. Troconls and even stated that she regarded herself as an "advocate". That, by itself is grounds for her impeachment. Experts have to be objective and independent. Her testimony was worthless.
Worthless to the case, yes, but she must've made a cool $20k for her efforts.
I mean 3 of the 4 guests at the dinner one night before the murder, 2 remembered steak and one remembered chicken, one remembered a toast about the future the other two didn't....the fact people think it's impossible people have the wrong memory or no memory at all of an event is bizarre.
Shannon Michelle’s last name is Greek and she is half Greek. She speaks both languages why concentrated in the Spanish
She is not 1/2 Greek!😂
If you don’t tell the truth, is that not a lie?
“Sealed custody agreement” is a lie.
I feel like shoe has said more than once that he’d believe fotis killed Jennifer…. Am I going crazy?
He told judge he's not going to argue the Oct.'24 court decision declaring Jennifer dead, except when he is.🤦♀️
He had five children and he never cried I can't believe that Jennifer wanted to live in a house with that Itch Ct need to do a Jennifer day at the state capital
Kevin!! Please stop saying “sort of” all the time. You’re a reporter but it’s hard to focus on your words when you’re constantly saying “sort of”. It’s like fingernails on a chalkboard!
DON'T FORGET - Charles Manson she testified "for" Charles Manson.
So basically any criminal who changes there story could be telling the truth and not intentionally lying. B.S.
The expert on Multilingualism, Viorica Marian, was paid just to explain Multilingualism, but she never knew MT, and never even bother to interview her. So why was she there as a witness? Just to collect money from MT😂😂😂
Hey I can be a cheaper expert witness, Michelle lied. Pretty simple. You know what and who you are with during your daily routine🤦🏻♀️
The "memory expert" with a terrible memory.............
The expert memory witness and Troconis look like they could be related. They actually favor one another in my opinion.
Michele save your tears for another day. You are not the victim. She is sneaky and her stunt exposing that sealed report was outright belligerent… sneaky and absolute disrespectful to the victim and her children. If for nothing else I hope she serves time for that! I do however think she was involved. Tired of her victim portrayals. Black widow.
Even if this woman is innocent, she will be proven guilty because of the hatred in peoples hearts
People tend not to like people who help murderers.
Or involve themselves with a married man with children.
Guilty
Do not understand how anyone at that oart would celebrate with fois about him gai ing full custody of the childrdn. Sone of them must have been aware thatjennifer was a superb mother
Memory 😂
Let's say that the burning probably was all the dirty paper towels
But if it was like that, why spread all the evidence in Hartford!
They just could burn everything at once. 🤷♀️
Now she says that she wasn't home..at the time, so who was it?
No one motioned MT's mom. The lady to travel back and forth at all times she mentioned the when she was 🛻 whit fotis. She was on a call with her mom. Someone looked 🕵 in to were the lady really was.?
It was her her Jeep got caught on camera going back and forth from house to house with the stuff to burn it never mind all the other video evidence of her downtown her DNA on the stuff and all of her lies this woman is not only involved she probably was biting at the bit to get it done
@yogabee2222 At the beginning of my tough, she was some way a victim of ftis too now
Now, at this point, she has to be someway involved!
I watched a guys' program last night. He's an expert in body language. And he was talking about the behavior when they were in starbucks, it was very interesting.
What I think is she didn't know what was going down and at the end. Somehow, she got involved, too...
The bad part is that the coward is gone.
I am praying that somehow someone finds her remains😓
They couldn't burn everything because Jennifer's shirt & bra were still wet, soaked with blood. That wouldn't burn and the many other things, mop handle, razor blade etc.....
True 👍 ✔️
Too risky because all the other items would burn an ash or may have metal pieces which a fire in a house wouldn’t produce enough heat to burn down.
How does a memory expert not remember, that some funny *hit
No hat?
She try to flea to Colorado 😅
Or lying....how about that....this witness is a lunatic
Host's voice grates. She has more than the necessary voice in this coverage, hogging the stage.
So the law can lie, but they expect the interviewed to tell the truth, ohhh double standards......
Wow that lady is the kiss of death. If she's on you're side you're going to the slammer.
Such a joke
He girlfield who owned a store tryed to sound like moving her hands she is a liar and she know she wasn't with her on the 29th why was she crying after the officer got up the witness stand her car never showed up and visit friend is such a liar why is she standing up and having a interpreter to say. She understand yes she does understand was there a marriage counselor they allways try to keep families together so forewarned to get money and she wanted fotis to give her money for her daughter private school
MT understands and speaks English. She is such a liar and fake makes me want to puke 🤢🤮🤮
I dont know why she is crying shes been over there showing closed documents maybe she knows shes in more trouble and i heard her mother is throwing kisses to the jurrors doesnt she know that only makes jennifer more guilty she is sucking up for her she should have been kicked out of the court room i just hope the jurrors do get it right because mitchelle needs justice to tear this familly apart like she did those poor kids has no parents and its all her fault i hope she has plenty of time to think about it she deserves it
Shannon Miller and Wendi Adelson look like sisters!!!
A joke accent or not she understood all
I speak 3 languages so its baloney
Well yeah can’t you find another expert
You are not reporting all the truth and are misleading the public who didn’t watch it themselves. That Memory expert was a joke! She couldn’t remember what she said in her own book she wrote. I’m done watching your coverage and encourage the public to watch the trial for themselves so they can hear the real truth instead of your editing and your interpretation which is biased.
The prosecutor was inappropriate.
How so ? What's inappropriate is Mt pleaing innocent and her act is inappropriate and this witnesses on memory is inappropriate and the document on Mt lap top is definitely inappropriate not the anything that the State prosecutors has shown or said comprende
The prosecutors were fantastic.
These cops in the state of Connecticut, get away with lying and manipulating someone into something that’s not true that is not right
If only criminals played fair and confess to their crimes, detectives wouldn't have to play unfair. It's not against the law. People who are innocent, don't need to change their story as the evidence contradicting their story surfaces. She's a liar and an accomplice.