Tiny Lotus Elan 26R overtakes TWO Ferrari 250 LMs at Sonoma

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 3 жов 2024
  • At the Velocity Invitational at Sonoma this little Lotus Elan 26R was able to hunt down not one, but two stunning Ferrari 250 LMs in this qualifying race at the Velocity Invitational.
    #velocityinvitational #gwflatout #Ferrari #Lotus
    Official Website 👉 www.goodwood.co...
    Facebook 👉 / goodwoodrrc
    Instagram 👉 / goodwoodrrc
    Twitter 👉 / goodwoodrrc
    SUBSCRIBE for more racing cars, supercars, new car reviews, historic motorsport and Goodwood event coverage 👉 bit.ly/GoodwoodTV
    Buy your Goodwood Event tickets 👉 bit.ly/GWBuyTic...
  • Авто та транспорт

КОМЕНТАРІ • 50

  • @GoodwoodRR
    @GoodwoodRR  10 місяців тому +9

    Would you race the Lotus or the Ferrari?

    • @jcgabriel1569
      @jcgabriel1569 10 місяців тому +5

      Well...
      For Sonoma, I guess the Lotus Elan would work wonders. The track had plenty of twists and turns that favour the agile Elan...
      But, in places like Goodwood, or Le Mans, Spa, I'll pick the Ferrari.
      Still, if I were to be given a chance, in this particular situation, I'm sure I'll give the Ferrari a try anyway!

    • @zounds13
      @zounds13 10 місяців тому +6

      The Lotus. Not even close.

  • @augustortiz
    @augustortiz 10 місяців тому +12

    Lotus was having more fun too. Not having to worry about the "near" priceless status of the car.

  • @ElliottCollect
    @ElliottCollect 10 місяців тому +16

    I expect nothing less from Horatio Fitz-Simon! A 23 year old racing talent!

  • @alastairwatson3201
    @alastairwatson3201 10 місяців тому +11

    I think the commentators were a bit busy Ferrari worshipping to understand how great that was.

  • @AtypicalDriver
    @AtypicalDriver 10 місяців тому +9

    Lotus!!!!!! Always love the underdog.

  • @JerGol
    @JerGol 10 місяців тому +13

    Colin Chapman famously said: "If you want to go fast in a straight line, add power. If you want to go faster everywhere, add lightness!"

    • @BLENDITE
      @BLENDITE 10 місяців тому

      you mean remove weight? but srsly, great quote, and true as well

  • @drew699
    @drew699 10 місяців тому +38

    Lotus Elan, showing everybody why lightweight is better than everything else, including Ferrari V12 power.

    • @philippbehrend5559
      @philippbehrend5559 10 місяців тому +1

      dunno bout that, those ferraris are worth 20 million and the Lotus......well.....20 thousand. I'd be driving them on eggshells too, but if you unleash them they should be quicker for sure.

    • @ElliottCollect
      @ElliottCollect 10 місяців тому +4

      @@philippbehrend5559 - The 26R will be closer to $150,000. Still a big difference in values, for sure!

    • @wierdoslam4760
      @wierdoslam4760 10 місяців тому

      A Honda CRX taught me how much fun a light car can be. Even with it being front wheel drive, if you did it correctly, you could get around a turn/corner at crazy speeds.

    • @drew699
      @drew699 7 місяців тому +1

      @@philippbehrend5559you think the lardy Fezza’s aren’t being thrashed for all they’re worth?? The Lotus 26R has the measure of the V12’s. BHP is vanity, BHP per tonne is sanity.

    • @robertpatrick3350
      @robertpatrick3350 4 місяці тому

      @@philippbehrend5559they might cost 20 £M but the Lotus shows that the Ferrari’s are not worth it

  • @grossmeister1181
    @grossmeister1181 10 місяців тому +6

    Very good to see that the Lotus handles a lot better than those Ferraris and the lack of power is no problem because the lightweight car compensates for this. As Chapman said: more horsepower makes you faster on the straights, less wait makes you faster everywhere.

  • @theotherpaulmitchell
    @theotherpaulmitchell 10 місяців тому +6

    Well done Horatio! As soon as I saw that it was you I knew you'd get them both.

  • @sprinklesdavenport8246
    @sprinklesdavenport8246 10 місяців тому +8

    Horatio is a legend!

  • @garstanforddasilva9663
    @garstanforddasilva9663 10 місяців тому +4

    Thus proving that it ain’t what you drive, but how you drive it 😊

  • @markhale8084
    @markhale8084 10 місяців тому +3

    Horatio always seems to kick arse, go back and watch his efforts at Monterey against the Cobras. His effort today was great…I’m still at track as the sun is setting. Love SEARS POINT! (change back the name, it was done in past).

  • @hhh1950
    @hhh1950 10 місяців тому +4

    Great racing by three fabulous drivers!!!!!

  • @VoOdOo-VinZ
    @VoOdOo-VinZ 10 місяців тому +4

    This guy had a great time for sure!! And two big things on the seat :)

  • @farowtt4721
    @farowtt4721 10 місяців тому +8

    incredible driver .

  • @markotoole7937
    @markotoole7937 10 місяців тому +3

    Well done Hortatio, excellent racing!

  • @jeff119990
    @jeff119990 10 місяців тому +2

    this was great to watch in person.

  • @05Rudey
    @05Rudey 5 місяців тому +2

    Lotus Elan is pretty much my favourite car right now.

  • @satanssurfer5965
    @satanssurfer5965 10 місяців тому +3

    Great racing.

  • @gregus69
    @gregus69 10 місяців тому +8

    L O T U S P O W E R

  • @michaelkatzkrefeld
    @michaelkatzkrefeld 10 місяців тому +1

    amazing.

  • @matteoghizzoni8559
    @matteoghizzoni8559 10 місяців тому +2

    Ferrari 250 LM : CHAPEAU !!!

  • @Yvolve
    @Yvolve 10 місяців тому +7

    I'm amazed no competitor tried to get the 250 GTO win annulled as it didn't meet the criteria when it raced, nor afterwards. Fairly straightforward breach of the rules I imagine.
    Things like this always remind me of Clarkson's Grand Tour bit on Lancia and their Audi rivalry. They had only built half the amount, so after showing them half the cars needed, Lancia took the inspectors out for a long lunch. Meanwhile, the Lancia staff were transporting the cars they just inspected to another warehouse and swapped the plates. After the three hour lunch, the inspectors saw "the other half" of the cars and signed off on the homologation.
    The Lancia team also salted the roads at night, on a winter stage as they knew their car wouldn't perform well on ice, so they got rid of it.
    It's always the Italians.

    • @jcgabriel1569
      @jcgabriel1569 10 місяців тому +4

      Oh, here we go again...
      The "why the Ferrari 250 GTO isnt eligible for the GT class because they didn't make 100 of them for homologation" story...
      If so, then Aston Martin, Jaguar and AC/Shelby would've been an even bigger cheat.
      Aston Martin only made 4-5 Project cars, from DP212-215.
      Jaguar only made 12 E Type Lightweights.
      And Shelby only made SIX Daytona Coupes...
      And yet, all of them raced in GT class, where, as you say, they needed to make 100 examples to be homologated...
      Can you explain why? Because I can...

    • @Yvolve
      @Yvolve 10 місяців тому +1

      ​@@jcgabriel1569 Oh, here we have a triggered Ferrari fan it seems.
      I just wondered why none of the teams which lost to an illegal car, didn't try to contest that win.
      This goes for every car which wasn't eligible, regardless of brand.
      I don't care as to the "why", the question is why the competitors didn't make an issue of this, since it is a pretty big deal to win Le Mans. Especially if you financed the entry that lost to an illegal car.

    • @jcgabriel1569
      @jcgabriel1569 10 місяців тому +2

      ​​@@Yvolve Unfortunately for you, I'm far from a diehard Ferrari fan, more like someone who hated often repeated motor racing stories that were simply untrue.
      Here's how it actually works, and before you disagree, I read the FIA regulations for the time period, for the World Sportscar Championship...
      True, to be eligible for homologation into the GT class, the manufacturer would have to make 100 examples of the car.
      And, here's something that would surprise you...
      Once the manufacturer had built 100 examples, they were allowed to make a variant with modifications to the design, as long as they can show and prove that it is a "logical evolution of the type".
      And, this "improved" variant don't need to be built in 100 examples.
      Now, Ferrari had fielded the 250 SWB at the GT class, they had made more than 100 examples by that time, and as a result, they can make an "improved" variant. Also, to add further, the 250 SWB is a part of the Ferrari 250 series of cars, of which Ferrari certainly made more than 100 at that point as well.
      And that is the GTO.
      It's not called the GTO, because they've already made 100 of these cars, hence 'O' for 'Omologato', it's because they've already built more than 100 SWBs, so they're now allowed to make this improved version.
      In short, it's the Ferrari 250 SWB that was homologated, and the Ferrari 250 GTO, as far as Ferrari and FIA is concerned, is just an improved variant of the 250 SWB, not a standalone car, and hence, didn't need 100 examples to be built.
      So, you're question as to why no one complained?
      It's because there's nothing to complain about, it's completely within the rules. Hell, everyone followed Ferrari's example!
      Like I said, there's the Jaguar E Type Lightweight, which were basically the improved variant of the normal E Type.
      Aston Martin Project cars were the improved variant of the DB4 GT.
      The Shelby Daytona Coupes were the improved variant of the AC/Shelby Cobra.
      And that also explains why FIA and CSI refused the homologation of the Ferrari 250 LM. Because no matter which way one looks at it, it's no longer a "logical evolution of the type", as stated by the regulations. The GTO still shares similarities with some features of the SWB, the 250 LM only share the same wheelbase...

    • @Pikestnt
      @Pikestnt 10 місяців тому +2

      Lotus did something similar on one of the many occasions when they needed money from the bank: They showed a car park full of finished cars which were obviously collateral for the loan. Except, only the outer cars were fully finished. Cars further in (deliberately made inaccessible by parking them closely) had engines missing and the innermost cars were just body shells on tressles.

    • @Yvolve
      @Yvolve 10 місяців тому

      @@PikestntColin Chapman and his scheming. He was such a legend!

  • @clarksonoceallachain8536
    @clarksonoceallachain8536 4 місяці тому

    Back in the 62' le mans a 1000cc deep sanderson 301 raced besides a ferrari gto

  • @robertpatrick3350
    @robertpatrick3350 4 місяці тому

    The engine in the Lotus had some very talented engineers involved in its development…. Westlake and the founders of Cosworth whose engines went on to dominate F1

  • @kikiautorcman787B
    @kikiautorcman787B 10 місяців тому +3

    Never seen an Elan overtake a Ferrari in her era... Or on a short "speedway"... 😉🤔⁉️💯🛢️🔥🏁🏎️🤓

  • @italianduded1161
    @italianduded1161 10 місяців тому +5

    those Ferraris are so sexy

  • @barondegil1
    @barondegil1 Місяць тому +1

    To all those who mistakenly imagined that Lotus beat these 250 LM because it has a better weight to power ratio and that this decided the issue, Ferrari has a better ratio! If you decided that Lotus beat Ferrari because Ferrari is big and fat (this is not true, 250 LM is the lightest and smallest car in its class). Lotus was able to beat these two LM because it has a talented driver Horatio Fitz-Simon behind the wheel. What happens when a good driver is behind the wheel of a LM, you can see by watching another video on this same channel. I am attaching the link, enjoy watching! ;) ua-cam.com/video/WMq_y8-eg04/v-deo.html

  • @theoneandonlybosable
    @theoneandonlybosable 10 місяців тому

    "Ferrari 250 LM", IYKYK

  • @pchurchill
    @pchurchill 10 місяців тому

    Elan smokin ..literally ?.. did it last ?!

  • @pchurchill
    @pchurchill 10 місяців тому

    elans never won le mans? .. even a class win ?

  • @kurtkaster5666
    @kurtkaster5666 10 місяців тому +2

    How aggressive can you really be going against a multimillion dollar sculpture of a car!