What's the point? These are all just comparisons between hardship and misery . You can't listen to music at a high level with such tiny things... This 3/5 concept of the BBC is ancient, and was actually only intended as a monitor for speech. However, the ATC should be superior in every respect, but the same applies here: no complete reproduction without the support of a subwoofer
This Rodgers 3/5 was intended by the BBC as a news loudspeaker in small broadcasting booths and for mobile transmissions, and that's exactly how it sounds. Good intelligibility for speech and nothing else and that's exactly how it sounds and measures up... the fact that the hi-fi world has turned it into a high-quality loudspeaker for music reproduction is total nonsense.😆😅😁
One is a 15ohm speaker (rogers) and the other a 6ohm. The amplifier has a more difficult load to deal with-with the Harbeths. It’s important to understand speaker and amp pairing which in a way makes any real comparison impossible when the speakers are of a different impedance.
![Rogers LS3/5a + NEW Audio Research I/50 [4Kᵁᴴᴰ]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/29LlI_6Tqt8/mqdefault.jpg)
Great test. Rogers sounds better. Better stereo image and soundstage, more live, more transparent, fuller and also juicier.
Harbeth imo, much wider soundstage, clearer more transparent 😂and emotional notes and voices..notes have deeper
decay too.
2:19
4:19
Thanks! Very well done! A comparison between LS3/5A vs ATC SCM11 would be nice!
What's the point? These are all just comparisons between hardship and misery . You can't listen to music at a high level with such tiny things... This 3/5 concept of the BBC is ancient, and was actually only intended as a monitor for speech. However, the ATC should be superior in every respect, but the same applies here: no complete reproduction without the support of a subwoofer
LS3/5A's Vocal about two three times more emotion than P3 esr
ในคลิปชอบเสียงRogersมากกว่าเสียงมีมิติใสสว่างครับ
เป็นลำโพงที่ให้เสียงราบเรียบทั้งคู่ โรเจอร์โปร่งใสกระจ่างกว่า ในขณะที่ฮาเบ็ตกลมกล่อมลุ่มลึกครับ
ขอบคุณครับ😊
I agree
Rogers for me
Limited dynamics on rogers. Sound seems to be straining.
ชอบ rogers ครับ harbeth ฟังนานๆน่าจะเหนื่อย
Rogers for me ❤
🥳
The Harbeth have a more transparent and clean 'hi-fi' sound, but the Rogers sound more musical and enticing to me.
รูปแบบเพลงร้องดนตรีแบบนี้ harbeth แสดงออกมาชัดแจ้งกว่าเหมือนนั่งฟังจริงกว่า
Rogers LS3/5A 👍👍
Sounds good
1st track = Rogers win.
2nd track = Harbeth win.
How you can distinguish sounds in these ways is a mystery !
If you listen to lots of speakers you train your ears.
Harbeth sounds incredibly musical
Harbeth is more musical...has more soul ❤
Harbeth have are more open and forward in vocals much better for me.
Nie rozumiem tego, ale Rogers LS3/5A dla mnie są super :)
This Rodgers 3/5 was intended by the BBC as a news loudspeaker in small broadcasting booths and for mobile transmissions, and that's exactly how it sounds. Good intelligibility for speech and nothing else and that's exactly how it sounds and measures up... the fact that the hi-fi world has turned it into a high-quality loudspeaker for music reproduction is total nonsense.😆😅😁
Rogers est plus musical, sensuel dans le medium. Ecoute parfaitement équilibrée. Harbeth sonne plus clair.
One is a 15ohm speaker (rogers) and the other a 6ohm. The amplifier has a more difficult load to deal with-with the Harbeths. It’s important to understand speaker and amp pairing which in a way makes any real comparison impossible when the speakers are of a different impedance.
why not Harbeth LS3/5A
Yes l have some harbeth ml monitors slighlty larger cabinets but essentially ls3/5a sound lovely.
Harbeth bit more muffled. Rogers more exciting.
im getting tired from rogers even in through video sound uff.. Harbeth by far more musical.. rogers way too bright
Suonano bene tutti e due, suono piu trasparente e aperto sui Rogers gli Harbert hanno un suono un po' piu chiuso, più intimo.
Rogers win
Totally agree!!
Harbeth ออกเสี้ยนฟันเยอะกว่า liveกว่า
ฟังแล้วชอบharbethมากกว่าครับ เสียงมีชีวิตชีวากว่า Rogerซึ่งออกจะราบเรียบไปหน่อย
Harbert лучшше.
Speakers demonstrated without their specially designed grilles, why.
Because beauty should not be hidden. And marginal difference in sound.
@@cmessi Margins matter!
@@arnolfini1434 only for audiophiles.
Rogers win.
2:18 4:19