US Testing the Latest F-35's Ultra Fast Gatling Gun

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 3 лют 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 1,5 тис.

  • @juliocesarayala4236
    @juliocesarayala4236 4 роки тому +3

    SALUDOS CORDIALES DESDE PANAMÁ AMIGOS GOOD VIDEOS 🇵🇦🇵🇦🇵🇦😀😀😀🇵🇦🇵🇦

  • @RuiPlaneSpotter
    @RuiPlaneSpotter 3 роки тому +1

    Nice video 🙏🏼✈️❤️

  • @SimonCas
    @SimonCas 4 роки тому +54

    Imagine working on something that cost several times more then your entire squadron would earn for a lifetime of service.

    • @Trump-jv8xf
      @Trump-jv8xf 3 роки тому +6

      That applies to almost all military aircraft and aircraft equipment. Air Force’s ain’t cheap. For most in Air Force’s, air force personnel enjoy working on something so cool.

    • @Bradlalb123
      @Bradlalb123 3 роки тому +5

      That something was made by a squadron way bigger than any squadron a soldier has ever seen

    • @kevinduliesco5468
      @kevinduliesco5468 3 роки тому +1

      Yup

    • @aceluke7783
      @aceluke7783 3 роки тому +1

      Yeah, so what is the point other than whining?

    • @danneu8
      @danneu8 3 роки тому

      Sounds awesome

  • @smarterthenyou001
    @smarterthenyou001 2 роки тому +1

    F35 is totally the metal gear ray of aviation

  • @walterteske598
    @walterteske598 4 роки тому +11

    It’s wonderful that we reveal our military technologies to our enemies!

    • @hkn7286
      @hkn7286 4 роки тому

      korona hehehe

    • @josefpaul4688
      @josefpaul4688 4 роки тому

      It's not cause when they see it they will make theirs bettet

    • @negativenarwhals
      @negativenarwhals 4 роки тому

      @@josefpaul4688 sarcasm

    • @robertelmo7736
      @robertelmo7736 4 роки тому +8

      If you are seeing it in this video they already know about it..we are 20 years ahead of what you are looking at now most likely.

    • @carlosaguilar3916
      @carlosaguilar3916 4 роки тому

      @@hkn7286 222 de

  • @savariaalkolandai5324
    @savariaalkolandai5324 3 роки тому +1

    Everything goes smoothly 😁😂

  • @ginolorenzo4117
    @ginolorenzo4117 4 роки тому +158

    "US Testing F35 Ultra Fast Gatling Gun"
    1 Minute: *Gatling Gun*
    9 Minutes: *No Gatling Gun*

    • @kirk776
      @kirk776 4 роки тому +1

      @Timmy Pruitt I bet you said that, but you don’t even know what it means.

    • @esakhwaja8592
      @esakhwaja8592 4 роки тому

      @Timmy Pruitt bold of you to assume he's ever been invited to one

    • @rodfel2001
      @rodfel2001 3 роки тому

      To shoot what? ... lol ...

    • @rodfel2001
      @rodfel2001 3 роки тому

      LMAO ... LOL ... LOL ... this one worth one billion dollars ... would you take a check ? ... LOL ...

    • @nekoericson5256
      @nekoericson5256 2 роки тому

      FYI the 10 minute length initiates full UA-cam monetization. In other words, a 10 minute UA-cam video is the optimal length for monetization.

  • @mr_beezlebub3985
    @mr_beezlebub3985 4 роки тому

    No annoying robot voice makes me happy.

  • @mariakuijpers5308
    @mariakuijpers5308 4 роки тому +3

    Geweldig om te zien 👍

  • @dndworkshop
    @dndworkshop 2 роки тому

    in my opinion, SU-57 is the most eye-catching design

  • @1492tomato
    @1492tomato 4 роки тому +21

    Met a retired FA-18 pilot at a party a few years ago. "What do you do for excitement after flying one of those?" He just grinned and shook his head.

  • @josemilenario7253
    @josemilenario7253 3 роки тому +2

    Que hermoso nave el F35🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸 💯💯💯💯💯💯💯desde TEMUCO DE CHILE🇨🇱🇨🇱🇨🇱🇨🇱🇨🇱🇨🇱🇨🇱

  • @hollow_9476
    @hollow_9476 2 роки тому +3

    This makes me feel so much proud being an american knowing what we have reached in military technology.. absolute air superiority over every other nation

  • @tanpengjoo7205
    @tanpengjoo7205 2 роки тому +1

    MADE IN USA ALWAYS POWERFUL N BEAUTIFUL, ALWAYS SUPPORT AMERICA N ALLIES FOR WORLD PEACE N HUMANITY N PROSPERITY

  • @mikeday62
    @mikeday62 4 роки тому +15

    Just watching an F-35 video gives my situational awareness a boost.

  • @garysteed6903
    @garysteed6903 2 роки тому

    Damn!!! That gun Ain't no joke. They need to put 2 in place like that of the P-51a mustang. Can you imagine what kind of hell an enemy would catch if a pilot could pick and choose which side he could shoot from in a dog fight?

  • @RiXFortuna
    @RiXFortuna 4 роки тому +43

    One can see, by the texture, absence of rivets and panel alignments that it is state of the art tech materials and methods, the best possible today

    • @papo1515
      @papo1515 4 роки тому +3

      All very true.....unless your enemy has an S-400, then your toast. these fighter aircraft are obsolete tools of war, same as aircraft carriers, these implements are used mostly against tribal war lords, or drug cartel kingpins, also, to keep the military industrial complex money machine turning.

    • @LowTEC.Dracarys
      @LowTEC.Dracarys 3 роки тому +1

      @@homosapienze well, F35 worked without issue in Syria by Israelis

    • @LowTEC.Dracarys
      @LowTEC.Dracarys 3 роки тому +3

      @@homosapienze I am not disagreeing with anything, I was just plain stating what actually happened in the real world. Did F35i's successfully attack in areas covered by S300/400 without getting detected? YES, repeatedly. Has any F35 been shot down by S300/400 so far? NO, not once. just that simple. Therefore I don't see how "S400 Sams eat F35's for breakfast"
      Otherwise, I wouldn't doubt anything else you mentioned as I simply don't see any proof to agree or dispute on.
      Also, it is a well-known question regarding the effectiveness of the S400 capability in detecting any stealth jets, given they quoted a 600km of effective range.

    • @LowTEC.Dracarys
      @LowTEC.Dracarys 3 роки тому +1

      @@homosapienze I don't know what makes you such a hostile personality that I started to feel sorry for you. I was just simply stating the results of the real world and you began throwing me a bunch of "theories"
      "Critical thinking requires that you test your theories to destruction before you go public"
      So, please enlighten me, what sort of tests have you done on those theories to destruction, as you said, before your unsophisticated posts that make you appear foolish?
      Were you, personally in one of those F-35i's during the attacks? Were you being tracked? Did the S400 catch you?
      "Never argue with Idiots, they will attempt to lower you to their level and beat you with experience"
      love your quotes btw, funny guy

    • @f1reguy587
      @f1reguy587 3 роки тому

      If you are flying any aircraft into a SAM situation, you have been left without other options. The pilots learn to train against targeting systems and how to fly somewhat damaged, if no f35s were shot down there’s a huge portion of talent to be given toward intel and the pilots. But knowing the technology is always changing and parts on these systems could improve, you don’t wanna poke the bear.

  • @ericaeu4486
    @ericaeu4486 3 роки тому

    F-18: ayoo f-35
    F-35: ay wassgud
    F-18 hold ma punch
    F-35: huh “gets punch”

  • @tobyihli9470
    @tobyihli9470 4 роки тому +77

    It’s a very rare occasion that a gun could even work in a modern dogfight, but the fact is that it does happen, albeit once in a thousand sorties. Then there is pilot state of mind. The F4 Phantom was designed without a gun because we had brought online the latest and greatest air to air missiles, and the planes designers felt it was too expensive and unnecessary. The first time a missile failed or the pilot fired them all, the pilots expressed horror at being vulnerable and pilot morale plummeted. A gun was added, and it simply has been a dead issue ever since. The issue may be revisited in the future, but for now, all fighters, even the invulnerable F22, are designed with a gun. I feel there’s no need to revisit the issue. You’re not going to change the pilots minds, and it’s their lives on the line anyway. To gun or not to gun will be an issue soon dealt with, as the military wants to built the sixth generation fighter with a new optional pilot. I prefer it built with no cockpit to save huge amounts of money, space, and an ability to fly as no human could bare. The future will be very interesting, no doubt! Exciting, don’t you think?

    • @Gorilla2412
      @Gorilla2412 3 роки тому +6

      yep a gatling cannon is always your last resort. But u need it for when shit hits the fan and also its very useful for multi-role fighters like the f35 cus they can do a-10 like CAS

    • @TheGrammargestapo1
      @TheGrammargestapo1 3 роки тому +3

      the problem is that when two modern jets merge, one or both of them has to die. There is no extending away. there is no escape. It doesn't cost much at all to implement a cannon with a few hundred rounds of ammo. The jet, especially one as heavy and bulky as the F35, isn't going to perform particularly better without it. There's no reason to rob the pilot of the only weapon that will work when two jets are within a km or so of one another.

    • @tobyihli9470
      @tobyihli9470 3 роки тому

      @@Gorilla2412 All true.

    • @tobyihli9470
      @tobyihli9470 3 роки тому +2

      @@TheGrammargestapo1 I agree for the most part, except the point you made about it’s weight. I researched that, and the guns weight is significant. There’s a whole bunch a plane can do with that amount of freed up weight and space. At least a bomb or two in weight, and a decent amount of avionics with the freed up space. One problem. Big problem. Pilot moral would plummet if they don’t get a gun for their last resort effort at living. Say what you will it makes no difference. It’s a dead issue. It doesn’t matter what anyone believes, the pilots don’t feel safe without one. I tend to agree, even though what I think doesn’t matter.
      Usually the word, “stigma,’ is a negative connotation, but it doesn’t have to be. For instance, like a plane without a gun is stigmatized, right or wrongly, as being vulnerable by the pilots, likewise, any jet presented to the US Navy for consideration as the latest backbone of the fleet, like the F18 is, that doesn’t have two engines, is stigmatized as a risk to the life of the pilot by the Navy brass. It’s nearly impossible to get past the stigma, even though the single engine F35 has only “crashed” in the true sense of the word only once, for reasons unknown, and that only after seventeen (17) years in service. The single engine state of the F35 is the biggest reason the Navy hasn’t jumped at stocking the fleet with F35’s. Frankly, I don’t know why the military doesn’t just make a two engine F35?

    • @koekiejam18
      @koekiejam18 3 роки тому

      1. The F-35 has only one engine because it is a “budget-aircraft” its exported to alot of western countries and adding another engine wouldve genuinely increased costs by a serious margin. (Also you cant really chance that single engine design aftewards because if you look at the way planes are made they have a big part of then designed around the engine.
      2. The gun serves an incredibly useful factor which nobody here has gone further indepth on. But that is aerial support for ground troops. A burst of 20mil could be detrimental for the survival of ground troops in contact. The f-35 actually shows that it follows this doctrine by coming equiped with a 25Mil cannon which is more usefull against ground targets compared to the 20MM which is better for aerial targets.
      3 there are certain manouvers that let you escape out of a dogfight situation. Keep in mind that even a missile like an AMRAAM has only a 4 Nm range against a target that is flying away at high speed at a low level. Creating 4 Nm of distance between you and an opponent isnt impossible if you are in a supersonic jet
      4 putting a multi barreled gatling gun that also needs space for ammunition on a plane is a serious design factor. (The F/A-18 has a long nose to fit both the gun and the radar, the A-10 is even designed around the gun it has) altough there are examples of planes later receiving the ability to carry gunpods like the AV-8b harrier, F-35 (some versions) or the L-39ZA

  • @harjeetsingh-xf3ce
    @harjeetsingh-xf3ce 3 роки тому

    Most beautiful jet in history of aviation

  • @Pugboy35Man
    @Pugboy35Man 4 роки тому +16

    This is more like The Daily Air Force xD

    • @lanascott6527
      @lanascott6527 3 роки тому

      ALL THE BRANCHES WITHIN OUR BELOVED UNITED STATES MILITARY ARE KICK ASS. AIN'T NO BETTER.

  • @игорьалилуев-ц2к
    @игорьалилуев-ц2к 2 роки тому +1

    F-35 был и продолжает оставаться всего лишь истребителем-бомбардировщиком. Он слишком неповоротлив и не может тягаться с пушками су-27 и су-35. Что-бы беспомощность пилотов в ближнем бою не так ужасала и заставили поставить эту пушку.

  • @christianedgerton3775
    @christianedgerton3775 4 роки тому +6

    That weapon system is a work of art worth every penny

    • @bobdolespen
      @bobdolespen 3 роки тому

      Nothing about this plane is worth every penny, its a cost overrun nightmare and literally robs US taxpayers and provides absolutely no benefit to our national defense effort as its designed to fight enemies that don't fucking exist. The F-35 is THE best example of corporate welfare that you can point at.

  • @bonosimic532
    @bonosimic532 2 роки тому +1

    the amount of force and strain that the gundoor has to handle, firstly the force and pressure from that gatling gun firing and then of course windforces blowing and tearing on it during full flight, it has to pop open and close right back, most impressive feat of engineering making this rather "miniscule" part of the entire jet possible.

  • @CgBrian
    @CgBrian 4 роки тому +19

    Minor correction.. the F35A is not the “smallest variant”, it’s the same size as the B.. the C is indeed larger than them though in terms of width and very little in height.

    • @solitarysolitude_
      @solitarysolitude_ 3 роки тому

      I feel like the B variant is smaller than the A vriant right? They don't have the same width, the B variant is kinda smaller and might be lighter than the others.

    • @Inspadave
      @Inspadave 3 роки тому

      The only significant difference in dimensions between the three models is that the C model has a wingspan of 13.1 meters whilst the A and B models have a span of 10.7 meters.

    • @carpingnyland8518
      @carpingnyland8518 2 роки тому

      In essence, the A and B are nearly identical in size (small differences in the engine nozzle), while the C has a notably larger wing, both in width and length. This allows for lower approach speeds needed for carrier landings. Despite their similar sizes, the B is substantially heavier (~2,500 lbs) than the A due mostly to the STOVL system (ducted fan, articulating nozzle, etc.) It also has a much lower fuel capacity and payload than the A. The C is the heaviest due to the larger wings, reinforced landing gear, arrestor hook, etc. Basically, the same disadvantages that every navilized version of an aircraft has.

  • @くがきゆう
    @くがきゆう 3 роки тому +1

    有这样强大的武器守护世界的和平,让人感到无比幸福。

  • @moondog8072
    @moondog8072 2 роки тому +3

    So nobody's gonna talk about how the ground crewmember flipped off the pilot at 2:58 after the salute? Must be a squadron thing.

  • @dulcidy
    @dulcidy 4 роки тому +1

    A-10 warthog: hold my beer

  • @chrisg2739
    @chrisg2739 4 роки тому +15

    Like how the ground crew saluted him then flipped him the bird haha

    • @Frankie5Angels150
      @Frankie5Angels150 3 роки тому

      @1Juemadre
      Now tell us how you take off and land a crosswind, Squidward.

  • @brisser68
    @brisser68 2 роки тому +2

    insane aircraft :-) love it

  • @robertelmo7736
    @robertelmo7736 4 роки тому +7

    Learned some stuff, good video.

  • @tgmaquatics
    @tgmaquatics 4 роки тому +1

    At 2:58 the Marshaller flips off the pilot 😂

  • @raywhitehead730
    @raywhitehead730 4 роки тому +17

    At full capacity weather internal or external pod you get about 2 , 3 seconds of shooting. They carry less then 300 rounds.

    • @LIONTAMER3D
      @LIONTAMER3D 3 роки тому +1

      that's well over 1500 rounds, not 300; also 300 rounds would not even be 0.1 seconds of fire lol

    • @Maverickf20
      @Maverickf20 3 роки тому

      @@LIONTAMER3D That’s BS, an m61 can’t shoot that fast.

    • @Maverickf20
      @Maverickf20 3 роки тому

      @@LIONTAMER3D Do the math, you get exactly 3 seconds of shooting with 300 rounds

    • @LIONTAMER3D
      @LIONTAMER3D 3 роки тому

      @@Maverickf20 that's like 30,000 rounds 0.o

    • @Maverickf20
      @Maverickf20 3 роки тому

      @@LIONTAMER3D An m61 shoots at 6,000 rounds per minute. Set up a ratio, its 3 seconds for 300 rounds

  • @TEKI07
    @TEKI07 3 роки тому +1

    0:59
    F-35: Look I can brrt
    A-10: That’s cute

  • @PrincessZelda_is_My_Side_Chick
    @PrincessZelda_is_My_Side_Chick 4 роки тому +8

    The F-35 is pretty badass, but I gotta give it up to that even more badass jet, the F-22 Raptor
    Can we see some footage of the new stealth bomber, the B-21 Raider?
    Its replacing the B-2 sometime in the near future if I remember correctly
    I havent seen very many videos about the Raider on UA-cam yet

    • @mindtraveller100
      @mindtraveller100 4 роки тому +2

      Maybe that´s due to the fact that it still doesn´t exist...

    • @Sp00kq
      @Sp00kq 4 роки тому +1

      Don't think it exists yet

    • @PrincessZelda_is_My_Side_Chick
      @PrincessZelda_is_My_Side_Chick 4 роки тому +1

      @@mindtraveller100 that's what they want you to believe
      I think it's just because they're trying to keep it on the super DL
      If I was a betting man, I'd put some money down that there's one hiding somewhere near Groom Lake

  • @عةقيعيااي
    @عةقيعيااي 3 роки тому

    Pretty good presentation ...well done them ❤💛💚💙👍⛤⛤👍👍✴

  • @cup_and_cone
    @cup_and_cone 4 роки тому +6

    Jesus christ that bay door on the gatling gun vibrates like crazy...and the plane is stationary. I can't imagine what it looks like when you add on the wind load in flight.

    • @cann5565
      @cann5565 4 роки тому +2

      It's usually 2-3 second bursts but the stress on the airframe is still insane

    • @rexxbailey2764
      @rexxbailey2764 4 роки тому

      BULLETS IN THE COCKPIT BAAAHAAHAAHAA 😂😂😂😂🤣🤣😂😆😆😆😆

  • @techmil188
    @techmil188 4 роки тому +1

    F-35 Stealth Fighter Has a Super Gun That Can Fire an Insane 3,300 Round Per Minute

    • @mindtraveller100
      @mindtraveller100 4 роки тому

      Yes. The same gun that the Harrier already had many years ago. And the gun in the "old" F15, F16, and F18 "only" fires 6000 rpm... Insane, isn´t it?

    • @terrain7879
      @terrain7879 4 роки тому

      @@mindtraveller100 it's a good gun.

    • @shesathome
      @shesathome 4 роки тому

      @@mindtraveller100 Russian ГШ-6-23 fires 9,000 rpm at 23 mm calibre! Incredible, isn't she?

  • @robbier7337
    @robbier7337 4 роки тому +8

    She is one beautiful bird.

    • @pilout8637
      @pilout8637 4 роки тому +2

      Bruh defenitly not

    • @-Diktator-
      @-Diktator- 4 роки тому +2

      looks more like a fly. dung fly.

  • @Improver12
    @Improver12 3 роки тому

    Excellent

  • @__Gw
    @__Gw 4 роки тому +4

    Imagine sharing military secrets like "for less radar detection " lol

    • @gasanweb
      @gasanweb 4 роки тому +1

      CCP China laught to this Americans naiveness. LOL
      No need more research, just wait for its secrets on UA-cam.... ^_^

  • @mompracem01
    @mompracem01 4 роки тому +1

    The F18 is such a beautiful airplane...

    • @jibbymarket
      @jibbymarket 4 роки тому

      Ikr. But this is an f 35

    • @mompracem01
      @mompracem01 4 роки тому

      @@jibbymarket After the F35 there is a F18 of the canadian air force (at 7:30)

  • @GeneralWildDog
    @GeneralWildDog 4 роки тому +6

    I want one for Christmas.

    • @PrathameshKulkarni-yi9kc
      @PrathameshKulkarni-yi9kc 4 роки тому

      🛩 just for you , don't give it to anyone

    • @dsalpha18
      @dsalpha18 4 роки тому +1

      Santa will have a heck of a job trying to stuff it down the chimney.

    • @GeneralWildDog
      @GeneralWildDog 4 роки тому

      @@dsalpha18 Let's try teleportation. If Santa must distribute gifts to 1.5 billion children scattered in 224 nations and regions, fanning out on 135 million km square, in one night, he must use teleportation as the solusion.

  • @josephprins1258
    @josephprins1258 2 роки тому

    The sound of freedom.

  • @kotabear151
    @kotabear151 4 роки тому +3

    Forget the guns....show em the ultra fast and deadly laser!!! 😲

  • @生きている間に罪プラを消化した

    VERY COOL

  • @wallycleaver1320
    @wallycleaver1320 4 роки тому +7

    That is a sexy airplane.

  • @talgatibraev4920
    @talgatibraev4920 3 роки тому

    Браво! Америка на страже мира и порядка!

  • @BernatSolle
    @BernatSolle 4 роки тому +5

    Este caza F-35, además de su versatilidad, velocidad, alcance, maniobrabilidad con sistemas informáticos integrados, y su extraordinaria aviónica, posee un diseño realmente muy hermoso.
    Todo ello, supongo que hace muy feliz al piloto que lo tiene en sus manos.

    • @Gsmooth10455
      @Gsmooth10455 3 роки тому +1

      Claro que si.

    • @kurniawaaann
      @kurniawaaann 2 роки тому +1

      Nyemplung lagi

    • @miguelacuna9252
      @miguelacuna9252 2 роки тому

      IGUAL VALE VERGA VA AÑOS CON EL PROBLEMA DEL CAÑON ,, ADEMAS NOOO POOSEE ULTRAMANIOBRABILIDAD

  • @joshuacedriccamamrista4254
    @joshuacedriccamamrista4254 4 роки тому +26

    F35 testing new ultra fast gatling gun
    A10 warhog:Im I joke to you

    • @andrewdoesyt7787
      @andrewdoesyt7787 4 роки тому +7

      A10 2000-3700 rounds a minute. F35 3300 rounds a minute. So the f35s shoots faster most times, I’m pretty sure the a10s shots are bigger tho. We shouldn’t even be comparing because there 2 totally different kinds of aircraft, the f35s just better.

    • @andrewdoesyt7787
      @andrewdoesyt7787 4 роки тому +7

      Oh wait the a10 does shoot faster. But the f35 is far superior.

    • @twoarc7293
      @twoarc7293 4 роки тому +4

      The two planes are built for different purposes, the F-35 is multipurpose the A-10 is air to ground anti vehicle, the F-35 costs more to maintain and needs a paved runway to function, the A-10 is cheap and effective with great fuel efficiency and can land on a dirt road covered in razor blades, the F-35 has a smaller gun than the A-10, the A-10 flies slower than the F-35 to maximize its airtime to allow the pilot to acquire targets as he or she plummets towards the earth, either way the F-35 is not replacing the A-10 warthog nor will it ever because the army won’t let the Air Force retire it, and the army practically owns the air force indirectly

    • @andrewdoesyt7787
      @andrewdoesyt7787 4 роки тому +3

      @@twoarc7293 and the f35 is stealth the a10 isn’t.

    • @Redwaltz4
      @Redwaltz4 4 роки тому +1

      All that stealth isn't worth spit in a CAS mission against a guy armed with a gun with enough reach and an eyeball mk I.

  • @janetjackson9700
    @janetjackson9700 4 роки тому +8

    Beautiful planes well built to take flight into the Air wherever needed..flys easily and smooth in the skies..👍👍💯💯ratings ..

    • @nasseralkhelaifi1853
      @nasseralkhelaifi1853 3 роки тому

      The gatling was reported ineffective for the f35. It was written that firing the gun destabilized too much the aircraft and would modify the behavior of the plane. The pentagone managed to solve this alert by writing on the report that not using the gatling will solve this issue

  • @Sopheap954
    @Sopheap954 3 роки тому

    Hello all you really Great 👍

  • @tombeard6236
    @tombeard6236 4 роки тому +18

    The engine is a F135, not a F136. The F136 was developed by General Electric for the Lightning II, but ultimately they went with the Pratt & Whitney F135 because it's more powerful and reliable. The F135 was developed from the F119 (F22 Raptor) which was developed from the most reliable fighter engine ever built, the F100 (F16, F15, X47B)

  • @onofriotaccone8508
    @onofriotaccone8508 3 роки тому

    Beautiful f35

  • @deniiiseg9780
    @deniiiseg9780 4 роки тому +3

    El futuro nuevo caza español 🤩🤩👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👍🏽

  • @marem3038
    @marem3038 4 роки тому +1

    The US do make awesome looking War Machines.

    • @Frankie5Angels150
      @Frankie5Angels150 3 роки тому

      @petnzme01
      So is your mother but she gets it regularly. What’s your point?

  • @aleksandrmalishev4350
    @aleksandrmalishev4350 4 роки тому +4

    Вы Лучшие парни!!!

  • @tanertavlan1769
    @tanertavlan1769 2 роки тому

    Awesome..

  • @qwertyzxcv123
    @qwertyzxcv123 4 роки тому +5

    Wannabe1: I'm driving a Lambo SVJ!
    Wannabe2: I'm driving a Chiron!
    Wannabe3: I'm driving a La Ferrari!
    US jet fighter pilot: yes?

  • @gerhardmeyer5801
    @gerhardmeyer5801 2 роки тому

    Awsome gun

  • @SATO_FD2R
    @SATO_FD2R 4 роки тому +6

    Now this I have to see!

  • @wizzzer1337
    @wizzzer1337 3 роки тому

    GAU-22 goes BRRRRRRRRRRR

  • @АугустоПиночет-м7ж
    @АугустоПиночет-м7ж 4 роки тому +8

    Боже храни Америку!!!

  • @hoseynamini3464
    @hoseynamini3464 3 роки тому +1

    The fate of the f22 and f35 will be like f117

  • @papo1515
    @papo1515 4 роки тому +13

    Ahhhh, he did, he gave the pilot the finger at the end of salute, that's funny.

    • @oakpkdude
      @oakpkdude 4 роки тому +1

      He pointed up at the end. It's an apotropaic gesture, which means a gesture used to ward off bad luck. Common on flight decks.

    • @papo1515
      @papo1515 4 роки тому

      @@oakpkdude yeah, It's a common gesture in my neck of the woods too...LOL

  • @AlphaMachina
    @AlphaMachina 3 роки тому

    We have a new BRRRRRRRRT, fellas.

  • @totallyme4861
    @totallyme4861 4 роки тому +61

    I wish the USA would go with kilos instead of Pounds. It makes so much more sense, you can convert kilograms to tons instantly.

    • @nikodechela1
      @nikodechela1 4 роки тому +4

      I wish the same. But if you want a rough estimate you can divide pounds by 2, and you have kilos.

    • @cjjonez
      @cjjonez 4 роки тому +10

      2000 lbs - 1ton.....you right that was hard as freezer meat😯🤯

    • @ujjwalshrotryia8402
      @ujjwalshrotryia8402 4 роки тому +14

      @@cjjonez What a calculation man....
      Just that if you have used Google, you would have found that 2204 lb is a tonne
      Now try converting 75 tonne to pounds in under 5 seconds, and educate us how easy it was, I bet like freezer meat.
      Ohh btw, 75 tonnes is 75000 kgs and yeah it was really hard, like a freezer meat

    • @mikebode3740
      @mikebode3740 4 роки тому +6

      I wish other countries would stop trying to tell America how to do stuff. We single-handedly created the modern world with our system. I think it works fine. Good day.

    • @ujjwalshrotryia8402
      @ujjwalshrotryia8402 4 роки тому +10

      @@mikebode3740 Even the language used here is of west Germanic origin and they single-handedly created the modern world... epitome of confidence.

  • @ДЕРЕВЕНСКИЙДОМ-ОК

    Хороший аппарат! 👍🙋

    • @ИльяСмирнов-й4ш
      @ИльяСмирнов-й4ш 3 роки тому

      Только сам себя своей же пушкой подстрелил в этом году) Разбилось уже 8 или 9 машин.

    • @jokersuper9004
      @jokersuper9004 3 роки тому

      Парни пушка это доп оборудование за нее не плохие бабки попросят,💸💸💸, только это для ближнего боя, он упадет раньше чем она ему пригодится🤣😂🤣👍Ничего личного просто бизнес🤣😂🤣🙏

  • @zizoudembele4610
    @zizoudembele4610 4 роки тому +3

    God☝Bless 👏US air force 💪🇺🇸

  • @TheBuenoWorldDrone
    @TheBuenoWorldDrone 4 роки тому

    So nice info views. Like it. Thanks for sharing, friend. Take care & seeU.^-^

  • @josielleo8750
    @josielleo8750 4 роки тому +8

    Muito bom ✌🏻

  • @fredinandben6431
    @fredinandben6431 4 роки тому +2

    Amazing...👍👍👍👍

  • @goatculler
    @goatculler 4 роки тому +3

    best part of this expensive lemon

    • @gunayoruzlu
      @gunayoruzlu 4 роки тому

      @Fondil Mahbols i think you haven't tested a lemon.

  • @davidbalvin5230
    @davidbalvin5230 2 роки тому

    Los gringos son los reyes del mundo.,no hay quien se atreva a enfrentarlos.,su experiencia en la guerra,escuadrones especiales,y estas maravillas de naves,barcos,submarinos etc lo hacen lo más letal de la tierra.

  • @ThelastRaven-Ez8
    @ThelastRaven-Ez8 4 роки тому +8

    2:58 best part of the video

  • @ralphsmith242
    @ralphsmith242 3 роки тому +1

    The only thing 'ultra fast' about that Gatling gun is how quickly it runs out of ammunition

  • @jnmason6283
    @jnmason6283 4 роки тому +7

    Ok, yes 3300 (25mm) rounds per minute is fast... but the 20mm M61A2 Vulcan sprays 6600 rounds per minute.
    Even the GAU-8 sends 30mm murder bananas at 4200 rpm.
    Cool stuff nonetheless
    Also a correction, the F35 uses the P&W F135 engine. The F136 was the competing engine from GE that didn't make it to production because the "adaptive cycle" technology was too much of a technological risk... which now even P&W says it wants to implement.

    • @dwightsnyder5985
      @dwightsnyder5985 2 роки тому

      30mm murder bananas I love it that line cracker me hell up especially if you picture that literally In your head like I did

  • @lastaby5194
    @lastaby5194 3 роки тому

    Всем добра. Привет всем из России.

  • @jonniez62
    @jonniez62 4 роки тому +6

    Nice to see they took the bore sight fixture OFF the aircraft before firing!

  • @AlvinREDDELTA
    @AlvinREDDELTA 4 роки тому

    idk why f18 looks so badass

  • @sgtrollo2267
    @sgtrollo2267 4 роки тому +14

    i see good on 2:58 crew member show finger ...:P

    • @KaziikYoo
      @KaziikYoo 4 роки тому +4

      It's the Shaka sign

  • @Test-vl1ib
    @Test-vl1ib 2 роки тому

    Canada today just firmed up $14 billion USD purchase of 88 F-35s. I think it’s about time.
    (I won’t add any cynical comments about Trudeau in 2015 saying “we will never purchase F-35s ; )

  • @Duron13
    @Duron13 4 роки тому +3

    It definitely fired more than 181 rounds.

  • @peaceloveforever88
    @peaceloveforever88 4 роки тому +1

    F-35 = yehhhh baby

  • @republicofarmenia7574
    @republicofarmenia7574 4 роки тому +4

    USA💪🏼🇺🇸💪🏼USA

  • @mastain8227
    @mastain8227 4 роки тому

    Jozzzt👍👍

  • @Coco-vw9li
    @Coco-vw9li 4 роки тому +29

    4:07
    Is that the bomb that’s making the whistle?

    • @RhodesianBushmaster
      @RhodesianBushmaster 4 роки тому +6

      Engine on the recording aircraft I believe. Either way, it is an engine.

    • @kgyt123
      @kgyt123 4 роки тому +1

      It lined well tho

    • @inverspe9774
      @inverspe9774 4 роки тому +1

      Thats the bomb Im pretty sure

    • @RhodesianBushmaster
      @RhodesianBushmaster 4 роки тому +3

      @@inverspe9774 It's not. That low whistle is the engine. A falling bomb would not make that whistling noise, nor would it be loud enough to hear from the cockpit of another aircraft.

    • @firstlast9731
      @firstlast9731 3 роки тому +1

      doubt it

  • @danielfranco9405
    @danielfranco9405 3 роки тому +1

    Hola!!! Después de Probar una Nave de 200 Millones!!! Merece Probar un Carlos Primero 1 de 100 Años ....😎😎😎😎😎😎

  • @camillethomas3222
    @camillethomas3222 4 роки тому +4

    Soldier : "My General, we made test on F-35 systems!"
    General : "yeh, what the matter?"
    Soldier : "Stealth works well, missiles are efficient, bombs are terrible and canon is accurate!"
    General : "Does it fly?"
    Soldier : "How about weather today?"
    General : "Ok, i will buy some Rafales..."
    XD!

  • @yolandaquintero1492
    @yolandaquintero1492 3 роки тому

    Hola.saludos a ee.uu desde Venezuela

  • @sqr2024
    @sqr2024 4 роки тому +3

    The F15 remains king of the skies.

  • @1moderntalking1
    @1moderntalking1 3 роки тому

    I like the variant with the bigger wings 👍😀

  • @MC-wq4fk
    @MC-wq4fk 4 роки тому +109

    30 sec of gatling gun, 10 minutes of other crap.

    • @TekniqDNB
      @TekniqDNB 4 роки тому +8

      0:56 for the GAU-22

    • @padrepiokenobi8608
      @padrepiokenobi8608 4 роки тому +2

      A-10 is the one USAF can't replace it

    • @dpz9872
      @dpz9872 4 роки тому

      If it wasn't for all that "crap" as you call it you probably wouldn't be posting in English on UA-cam.
      The guy in cockpit relies on everyone, including the person back at the officer's dining room peeling his potatoes.
      It's a team.
      Period.
      🇺🇸 🗽

    • @dpz9872
      @dpz9872 4 роки тому

      @Karbon Workshop
      😆 You want fried rice with that comment ? 🍚

    • @dpz9872
      @dpz9872 4 роки тому

      @Karbon Workshop
      Good come back for a guy up posting on UA-cam at 4am, meth or minimum wage 3rd shift while blowing it in on your free government phone ?

  • @f-2215
    @f-2215 4 роки тому

    F22 and F35 looks the best among all fighter jets, they really look like something ufo from the future

  • @joonyang7379
    @joonyang7379 4 роки тому +20

    2:58 Look at his finger :) The Mechanic Fxxx to Pilot in his behind

    • @johnadams-wp2yb
      @johnadams-wp2yb 3 роки тому

      Yep, I saw that too.

    • @Two-Stack
      @Two-Stack 3 роки тому

      That’s his pinky, not his middle. 🤙

  • @sohailakhtar3898
    @sohailakhtar3898 3 роки тому

    Nice machine

  • @ezequielpiacenza5331
    @ezequielpiacenza5331 4 роки тому +5

    El mejor caza del mundo 👍😶😶👏 también los f18 y f15 y f16

    • @nobodytm163
      @nobodytm163 4 роки тому +1

      Es bueno tener confianza otra es engañarce asi mismo es un poco desquisiado......good lucky

    • @ezequielpiacenza5331
      @ezequielpiacenza5331 4 роки тому

      La mejor fuerza aérea del mundo la usaf los rusos anticuados y sin tecnología

    • @nobodytm163
      @nobodytm163 4 роки тому

      @@ezequielpiacenza5331 eso ni los eeuu lo creen de donde sacas tremendas mentiras y falta de tecnologia ja ja ja....te recuerdo que la tecnologia furtiva la incentaron los Rusos y un traidor la vendio a eeuu ...a Rusia no le importo pues era obsoleta y estupida pues sus investigadores sabian que al momento de la pos combustion pierde su furtividad es por eso que Rusia no tiene modelos con lineas como el f22 o el f35 los Rusos utilisan un camuflaje de plasma para su furtividad tus conocimientos son obsoletos aparte te recuerdo que el f35 es el yacolef 141 Ruso....que asta ahora no resuelven sus problemas estructurales son pateticos.......solo con el sistema brasuka4 es suficiente psra exterminsrlos investiga antes de comentar sandeces si wuieres responder primero investiga y da argumentos validos no cuentos de ciencia ficcion super tribi los avenyers y la ormiga atomica no existen good lucky

  • @michaelgautreaux3168
    @michaelgautreaux3168 4 роки тому +2

    Remember, the F35 is equal to F16 in speed & agility.
    The sweet 16 still rocks the socks off anything, anytime, anywhere! Now we have the 35!

    • @TheCort1971
      @TheCort1971 4 роки тому

      have you seen the new Sukoi fighters? as in the Su-57? sorry man i love the old yard dart but she dont stand a chance against the felon

    • @KJ-kn8pg
      @KJ-kn8pg 4 роки тому +1

      @@TheCort1971 remind me when they will use the felon.... Then talk. Btw yeah, if the felon really is that powerful, (not proven lmao) then the F-22 will take care of it... Felon still struggles with the stealth so atm its kind of sitting duck if AWACS is used. I hope they will upgrade that bird, it looks nice but the performance is not as good if it's supposed to be the most advanced Russia aircraft. And since ur a sukhoi fan boy pls write sukhoi correctly. * Sukhoi *

    • @TheCort1971
      @TheCort1971 4 роки тому

      @@KJ-kn8pg uh huh.... keep thinking that. if you cant hit it you cant shoot it down. and thats the end of the story. talk about not being proven? shit when did the raptor get proven i must have missed its combat debut where it was combat proven with kills. its a bad ass bird that is no doubt. but shitting on the felon is fucking stupid. just like you.

  • @simonacero9566
    @simonacero9566 4 роки тому +21

    a-10: your brrrrrt Is cute

  • @fishingwithfilitsa
    @fishingwithfilitsa 4 роки тому

    Very good