R27ER missing is always a close call (on good launch) Sparrow missing is often just deciding the ground directly beneath you is the target now if not the air 5 feet ahead of you.
The least Gaijin could do if they’re gonna force such an laughable imbalance in armament is give the F15 its full flight performance. Why are we missing so much thrust and top speed both on the deck and especially at high altitude :(
I completely agree, ive waited 10 years for this and they completely let me down. The top speed should easily be 1700 mph at 40000 ft. Besides the f22, this plane has been dominant since its release. Realistically this plane was stacked and i mean stacked! With aa missiles. It's radar is hands down the best in the world, besides the f22 f35 of course. It's strength is deleting enemies in BVR, well before any Soviet plane could lock on to its American counterpart. Idk what gainjin is thinking but they truly can not accept the fact America has, and has ha for the past 50 years, complete air dominance. I guess there solution is to take a 1975 plane and add planes that are 20-30 years older and classify them into the same battle rating, which is complete bs. Frustating!
I hate how they artificially handicap vehicles by not giving them the performance or armament they have IRL. If the game/maps arent laid out in a way or big enough to handle these weapons then dont add these jets and work on the maps first. I'm so tired of Gaijin's bs.
@@williamadams439 if you pretend war thunder to have realistic matchmaking based on the year of introduction, I really don't know what you've been playing these last 10 years... We are talking about the game where the top tier tanks are from the 2010s, the top tier planes are from the 1980s and the top tier ships are from the 1940s. Gaijin has never, EVER, cared about the year of introduction of a vehicle ever since they introduced the BR system back in 2014 or so.
@@williamadams439unfortunately this is a video game, America can’t just dominate in every aspect. While the balancing is ass your thinking is completely unrealistic and doesn’t work for video games
yeah missiles are... dubious sometimes. yesterday I locked and launched a skyflash on an f4e at my 2 oclock, and it just went and tracked my teammate at my 11 oclock. Not sure who got the most confused by that lmao
Pro tip for anyone in need for help getting a fox 2 lock without HMD. Use vertical radar scan in a dogfight to lock up on radar and then fox 2's will prioritize radar lock. This will help you greatly in a dogfight for when you need to get that good off-bore fox 2 with no HMD
i'm still wrapping my head around how a fucking aim7m could be so ass in performance that it would sooner lawn dart or self destruct rather than actually track a target, then expect the new Top US jet to only use that instead of an early aim120 that would at least be competitive against the r27er's for bvr performance.
It never shot down a soviet satelite. If that would have happened we would have had a major escalation in the cold war. On 13 September 1985, Maj. Wilbert D. "Doug" Pearson, flying the "Celestial Eagle" F-15A 76-0084 launched an ASM-135 ASAT about 320 kilometres (200 mi) west of Vandenberg Air Force Base and destroyed the Solwind P78-1 satellite flying at an altitude of 555 kilometres (345 mi). P78-1 or Solwind was a United States satellite launched aboard an Atlas F rocket from Vandenberg Air Force Base in California on February 24, 1979.
The F-15 doesnt seem to be performing like it should be tbh, that thing absolutely shits out thrust like no tomorrow, and the lack of new sparrows isn't helping either lmao
The Aim-7s have been so unreliable since the update dropped that I have barely used them. I still have them equipped for high flying targets, but I feel like they’ve been going off in random directions or just exploding mid air way too often. The AAM-3s are pretty nice though. EJ Kai with AAM-3s when though?
Irl the f-15 handles like a dream because of the amount of surface area it has giving it it’s hyper manuverability, if only it had thrust vectoring it would be stupid good at flipping around on people
i think there is a radar missile bug, because 2 times now my R27er went left when i was hard locked head on with someone. kinda like what your sparrow did, but one of the times my R27 went completely to the left. it's frustrating.
@@apolakigamingandmore6376 your whole UA-cam channel is a skill issue, at least you can control that, I can’t control a R27 pulling 35g to the left for no reason on a 7km head on
Hey big Joob, the f5e has gotten a kind of buff, since not too long ago, it now has CCIP for cannons and EEGS for them too, could u maybe consider playing it, since fun plane and all?
I feel like not adding the AMRAAMs or just not giving the f15A the performance it needs just so another vehicle to get the opposite of what the f15a gets rn. It is so unfortunate for the people that have been waiting for it.
sup, love your content, I've got a small question, how do u switch to the missile camera after it's been launched? I just recently researched some aircraft with useable missiles and I have no idea how to do that
you gotta play f15c in dcs its a blast once you learn it fr and yeah its a beast in dogfights and doesnt handle like a brick xD(you can play on controller youd just have to watch controller setup videos from tuuvas works just as good as a hotas)
I would love to have all these top tier jets the problem is it would take me a week to get one doing the same shit 6 hours a day. It’s just not worth it
I didn't mention the smokeless missiles. At 3:55, the Sparrow you launched produce 2 smoke lines shouldn't it be just 1 smoke line? What's your quality preset btw? Maybe due to different quality the graphics turned out like that idk though
Sparrows are definitely worse in basically every way to R27s but I feel like i have more success with them on my F16C while grinding for the F15? The F15 radar seems to drop lock much easier and the swivel range makes it basically impossible to notch R27s. They felt much more consistent for me than depicted in this video and my f15 games with them so far.
F-16C radar is the only radar I can vaguely consistently make Sparrows work with. F-4EJ Kai/F16A radar used to work good, doesn't anymore for some reason
In the sustained turn rate and a little of Instantaneous the F-15 is way over performing, by 6 degrees in sustained, and 10 to 30 in Instantaneous turn rates.
@nolanwaddill8472 not every aircraft, some even under perform and some are similar to irl or just right, examples are, F-16C, Su-27, and also the P-51, the F4U-4B, MIG-15 and even the spitfires are accurate or very close to accurate. This game isn't a pure arcade fuck fest, it has physics, and those physics aren't perfect but they are good ones, sure we can sustain 12G's but that's because this game doesn't care about wing structure wear and tear, if it did it would fly very similar to dcs, I've done my research ty
@nolanwaddill8472 that's the crazy part the F-15 is over performing with even going above 9G's, also they aren't over performing when the go above 9G's it's just the fact that wing structure wear and tear isn't existent to gaijin, but keep them below 9G's and the. Test them, and see if they over perform or not, look you can say everything over performs when you yourself don't even conduct any testing and then try to compere them to irl charts or em charts.
One of the most annoying things about the f15 in its current form is the lack of hmd, which really shows in a dogfight when you can barely not get your missiles seeker cone on the enemy, or get a radar lock for the gun sight without losing your nose advantage, his is especially annoying considering that the f15, including the a variant, had hmd irl.
No it did not. The US F-15A only briefly tested the same HMD as the F-4J and S have in game, but it wasn't adopted. Israel did include the HMD when they upgraded their F-15As in the 90s, and so did Japan with their F-15Js later, just some years ago. But no, being strict, no full production HMD was ever equipped on an american production F-15A, just on the C when they included the AIM-9X.
@@Coliflower185 you might actually be right, my info is just based on the first article I found that specifically said 15a since most I found just said f15 eagle.
The real f15a couldn’t carry the aim-120, and even if they do give it 2 aim-120s it would be an unrealistic upgrade and limiting it to 2 would set a bad balancing precedent
Wait, so the F15 we have in game rn is not the F15a, but the F15 MSIP??? Just so they could give it flairs, but keep all the other stats of the F15a? Bro wtf thats messed up, they be lying and manipulating us.
@@WirableCrown1 Yeah, the major nations is actually on the better end. Gajin keeps giving china tech tree bs, such as the VT4-A1 with 550KE on frontal upper plate, 577pen with 7 sec reload, 2nd generation two plane speed and completely sub par performances in basically everything and they simply say "Not enough info" and that is in 12.3. They're delusional with top tier vehicles.
"the undefeated" jet only shot down MiG21SP and Su-17s, and it got set on fire and inutilized by a MiG21's gun once, they spend over ten million dollars to put the aircraft back in the air. Why doesn't it count like a defeat?
U.S. F-15A has been pissing me off. It rips wings constantly, No HMD is a big disadvantage compared to all the other jets you fight having it.. AIM-9L's stock make me want to die. Aim-7M's troll hard for no real reason
I hate the f-15 so much it is a pain to fly, the missiles suck compared to it's counterparts and the radar just doesn't lock what you want it to lock it loves to lock on to a random tree 2 lightyears away. In my opinion it's not worth grinding out the US tech tree since the Russian R-27 family of missiles just dominate the higher tiers.
@@kevinfranklin7913 no it isn't. Its heavier, has a slightly stronger engine, has a longer burn time, has more explosive mass, has a higher track rate and a higher gimbal limit. its not a copy paste at all.
Not really, it's weaponry and flight performance are really not even close to what it faces currently. Though you should still research it because later after the F-14s F-18 will be added which will probably be a great plane(don't think that it will be meta but definitely fun to play)
@@VideoSmashers the amraam has a 60+km range and active radar homing, while most nations are stuck with skyflashes. its a skill issue for us mains basically
Crazy how the ER/ET is in the game but the AIM-120A isn’t. That’s a power creep we’ve dealt with for over a year. Literally have to handicap NATO this Russian propaganda simulator. Oh but when the AMRAAM is added it will be an early version and Flankers will get R-77 sure
Bro amraams will shit all over R-27s, now THAT would be powercreep if the Russians didn't get an active homing missile. If the amraam is gunna be added, the Russians need the R-27EA.
F15 FLIGHT MODEL IS OVERPERFORMING SIGNIFICANTLY. You can keep pulling like over 20 degrees AoA and easily maintain 500-600 kmh. This is stupid energy retention. not even f16 (ment to be the best ratefighter) can`t do that. My point is you can`t have both superior 2 and 1 circle performance on one single plane. You can say that SU-27 is still better in 1 circle. Well, just watch the begining of the video. Flanker can win in first couple of turns against the f15 and then 15 starts running circles around 27s or 29s. In 2 circle 27 don`t have a chance. That makes this thing is just unfair in the game where things are ment to be at least somehow balanced. I don`t really like that US got already 2 broken planes (f16 that pulls inhuman Gs and and now the F15 that does not lose speed in turns). The only good things about soviet jets are r73 and r27er and good first turn performance. You can hug the ground and R27ER is now not a threat to you. You can preflare the r73 and now it is flarable. And you can avoid the first turn of these jets. After that mig29 is a easy kill. Su27 might be a little harder, but again, watch the begining of the video. Joob didn`t brake a sweat to kill the flanker. I think that competition is good for the game. And one last things. Those couple of jets are getting AIM120s pretty soon. Each can carry more than 6 of those missiles. AMRAAMS might get a smokeless motor. That mean no smoke at all in this game. So in ground RB and in SIM it won`t be visible at all. If this happens im gonna leave top tier jets I suppose.
I feel like not adding the AMRAAMs or just not giving the f15A the performance it needs just so another vehicle to get the opposite of what the f15a gets rn. It is so unfortunate for the people that have been waiting for it.
![My LOOOONGEST GRIND for F-15J [Using F-4EJ ADTW Phantom 💀💀💀] BRRRRRT Experience !!!](/img/n.gif)
R27ER missing is always a close call (on good launch)
Sparrow missing is often just deciding the ground directly beneath you is the target now if not the air 5 feet ahead of you.
Or the sparrow implodes even though you have a full lock lmao
Or the sparrow bites on chaff….during PULSE DOPPLER
@@LewisB3217 Exactly thats what i tried to say with attacking the air five feet ahead of you but i was unclear lol
@@Ryan-go6id Recent update maybe SARH missile attracted to chaff now but its way more noticeable on sparrows that the r27
made not maybe*
The least Gaijin could do if they’re gonna force such an laughable imbalance in armament is give the F15 its full flight performance. Why are we missing so much thrust and top speed both on the deck and especially at high altitude :(
I completely agree, ive waited 10 years for this and they completely let me down. The top speed should easily be 1700 mph at 40000 ft. Besides the f22, this plane has been dominant since its release. Realistically this plane was stacked and i mean stacked! With aa missiles. It's radar is hands down the best in the world, besides the f22 f35 of course. It's strength is deleting enemies in BVR, well before any Soviet plane could lock on to its American counterpart. Idk what gainjin is thinking but they truly can not accept the fact America has, and has ha for the past 50 years, complete air dominance. I guess there solution is to take a 1975 plane and add planes that are 20-30 years older and classify them into the same battle rating, which is complete bs. Frustating!
I hate how they artificially handicap vehicles by not giving them the performance or armament they have IRL.
If the game/maps arent laid out in a way or big enough to handle these weapons then dont add these jets and work on the maps first. I'm so tired of Gaijin's bs.
@@williamadams439 if you pretend war thunder to have realistic matchmaking based on the year of introduction, I really don't know what you've been playing these last 10 years... We are talking about the game where the top tier tanks are from the 2010s, the top tier planes are from the 1980s and the top tier ships are from the 1940s. Gaijin has never, EVER, cared about the year of introduction of a vehicle ever since they introduced the BR system back in 2014 or so.
@@williamadams439unfortunately this is a video game, America can’t just dominate in every aspect. While the balancing is ass your thinking is completely unrealistic and doesn’t work for video games
Bruh look at the mig29 an su27... They loose speed faster than most delta wings
"Oh shit im going really fast"
>*looks inside*
>F-15
*Drip of the Japanese emperor intensifies*
XD and first
yeah missiles are... dubious sometimes. yesterday I locked and launched a skyflash on an f4e at my 2 oclock, and it just went and tracked my teammate at my 11 oclock. Not sure who got the most confused by that lmao
Clasic aim7
It's a flying weaponized tennis court and I'm here for it
Pro tip for anyone in need for help getting a fox 2 lock without HMD. Use vertical radar scan in a dogfight to lock up on radar and then fox 2's will prioritize radar lock. This will help you greatly in a dogfight for when you need to get that good off-bore fox 2 with no HMD
i'm still wrapping my head around how a fucking aim7m could be so ass in performance that it would sooner lawn dart or self destruct rather than actually track a target, then expect the new Top US jet to only use that instead of an early aim120 that would at least be competitive against the r27er's for bvr performance.
9:40 that missile was sniffing your ass 😂
Great vid man! Keep up the good work!
It never shot down a soviet satelite. If that would have happened we would have had a major escalation in the cold war.
On 13 September 1985, Maj. Wilbert D. "Doug" Pearson, flying the "Celestial Eagle" F-15A 76-0084 launched an ASM-135 ASAT about 320 kilometres (200 mi) west of Vandenberg Air Force Base and destroyed the Solwind P78-1 satellite flying at an altitude of 555 kilometres (345 mi).
P78-1 or Solwind was a United States satellite launched aboard an Atlas F rocket from Vandenberg Air Force Base in California on February 24, 1979.
ua-cam.com/video/wxJcEz3h4tU/v-deo.html&ab_channel=DarkFootage
@@komerzaragorn space is fake satellites aren't real
What you talking about?
Blud might be schizophrenic⁉️⁉️‼️‼️
Sparrows been loving going to space with this update. Them failing to track off the rail has been a real problem for me to this update lol
The F-15 doesnt seem to be performing like it should be tbh, that thing absolutely shits out thrust like no tomorrow, and the lack of new sparrows isn't helping either lmao
The thing weight less than Flanker by a bit and it engine is more powerful than flanker I think so yeah.
@@Boomkokogamezmore thrust, no
F-15 had 105kN per engine, Su-27S had 120kN per engine (Both full afterburner)
It destroys the flanker either way in a dogfight
@@nischeta5462destroys is a massive stretch
The Aim-7s have been so unreliable since the update dropped that I have barely used them. I still have them equipped for high flying targets, but I feel like they’ve been going off in random directions or just exploding mid air way too often. The AAM-3s are pretty nice though. EJ Kai with AAM-3s when though?
my last game the two sparrows i fired both just went left away from the target not being flared or anything
Stopped my Japanese grind to watch this
Same
Irl the f-15 handles like a dream because of the amount of surface area it has giving it it’s hyper manuverability, if only it had thrust vectoring it would be stupid good at flipping around on people
that mirage 4000 being an absolute ufo
i think there is a radar missile bug, because 2 times now my R27er went left when i was hard locked head on with someone. kinda like what your sparrow did, but one of the times my R27 went completely to the left. it's frustrating.
The missile doesn't know where it is
Not a bug, just a skill issue, I guess...
Clearly misunderstanding that civilian airliners for Russian missiles are like the sun for Fox 2’s
@@apolakigamingandmore6376 your whole UA-cam channel is a skill issue, at least you can control that, I can’t control a R27 pulling 35g to the left for no reason on a 7km head on
Hey big Joob, the f5e has gotten a kind of buff, since not too long ago, it now has CCIP for cannons and EEGS for them too, could u maybe consider playing it, since fun plane and all?
Since when?
@@akumati86 not sure, realised yesterday, but prolly came with the RWR update or sum
Wish granted
@@user-ny1rd4xi1z yea, lmao
50 years of F-15 in 2022
i dont know anyone else but for some reason i feel like F16 was the most hyped one in the history of WT
nah, gotta be the a10 or maybe the ho229 back in the day
probably bc it was one of the most modern jets in game at the time
Nah, MiG21. It was a plane they promised not to add
Bro I wish i had the eagle, researching it without premium time sucks
I feel like not adding the AMRAAMs or just not giving the f15A the performance it needs just so another vehicle to get the opposite of what the f15a gets rn. It is so unfortunate for the people that have been waiting for it.
The flight models definitely feel switched up with the SU-27
Another banger
Very good effort
sup, love your content, I've got a small question, how do u switch to the missile camera after it's been launched? I just recently researched some aircraft with useable missiles and I have no idea how to do that
I think it's U by default, can't remember what the setting is called
Hold U once you lanch a missile, this works for any suspened weapon (rockets, bombs)
Why does the trail look different on the sparrow? It looks like it has two trails
you gotta play f15c in dcs its a blast once you learn it fr and yeah its a beast in dogfights and doesnt handle like a brick xD(you can play on controller youd just have to watch controller setup videos from tuuvas works just as good as a hotas)
I would love to have all these top tier jets the problem is it would take me a week to get one doing the same shit 6 hours a day. It’s just not worth it
W video
Hey Joob! Please try landing a VTOL jet into active volcano on a new map, I don't have any VTOLs.
just wait to the Mitsubishi F-2 get in the game
I wouldn’t call it a brick when they where testing it they put it against an F-5 and it couldn’t shake the F-15
Joob why your missile launch has two smoke line? Mine usually one smoke lines are you using any mod?
aim9m's and aam3's are smokeless missiles.
I didn't mention the smokeless missiles. At 3:55, the Sparrow you launched produce 2 smoke lines shouldn't it be just 1 smoke line? What's your quality preset btw? Maybe due to different quality the graphics turned out like that idk though
@@notmyrealaccount5245it happen on my acct all the time it's a weird bug not everyone has
@@notmyrealaccount5245 a glitch that gaijin has yet to fix
I think there’s a glitch that causes an extra smoke trail when you fire missiles from the contrail level, because I don’t see this on low alt
My fg1 still having to face completely superior planes. We need 13.0!
Sparrows are definitely worse in basically every way to R27s but I feel like i have more success with them on my F16C while grinding for the F15? The F15 radar seems to drop lock much easier and the swivel range makes it basically impossible to notch R27s. They felt much more consistent for me than depicted in this video and my f15 games with them so far.
F-16C radar is the only radar I can vaguely consistently make Sparrows work with. F-4EJ Kai/F16A radar used to work good, doesn't anymore for some reason
In the sustained turn rate and a little of Instantaneous the F-15 is way over performing, by 6 degrees in sustained, and 10 to 30 in Instantaneous turn rates.
So is every other plane in the game, that’s how WT flight models are.
@nolanwaddill8472 not every aircraft, some even under perform and some are similar to irl or just right, examples are, F-16C, Su-27, and also the P-51, the F4U-4B, MIG-15 and even the spitfires are accurate or very close to accurate. This game isn't a pure arcade fuck fest, it has physics, and those physics aren't perfect but they are good ones, sure we can sustain 12G's but that's because this game doesn't care about wing structure wear and tear, if it did it would fly very similar to dcs, I've done my research ty
@@WOLFER. by virtue of pulling sustained overG, yes, every plane is overperforming in turn rate
@nolanwaddill8472 that's the crazy part the F-15 is over performing with even going above 9G's, also they aren't over performing when the go above 9G's it's just the fact that wing structure wear and tear isn't existent to gaijin, but keep them below 9G's and the. Test them, and see if they over perform or not, look you can say everything over performs when you yourself don't even conduct any testing and then try to compere them to irl charts or em charts.
subbed lets get you to it!
yay fun plane loolol I HATE THE GRIND!!1
I think that f14 phoenix spammer was me
Bruh that's the F-15A in the intro
yeah
One of the most annoying things about the f15 in its current form is the lack of hmd, which really shows in a dogfight when you can barely not get your missiles seeker cone on the enemy, or get a radar lock for the gun sight without losing your nose advantage, his is especially annoying considering that the f15, including the a variant, had hmd irl.
No it did not. The US F-15A only briefly tested the same HMD as the F-4J and S have in game, but it wasn't adopted. Israel did include the HMD when they upgraded their F-15As in the 90s, and so did Japan with their F-15Js later, just some years ago. But no, being strict, no full production HMD was ever equipped on an american production F-15A, just on the C when they included the AIM-9X.
@@jfv2312but Japan use F-15CJ and F-15DJ versions
US F-15As never got HMDs, F-15Cs only got them in 2007 alongside an AESA radar.
@@Coliflower185 you might actually be right, my info is just based on the first article I found that specifically said 15a since most I found just said f15 eagle.
The jas39 A god hms which if I'm right didn't get hms
Pure neuron activation
YOU SHOT DOWN HIS R73 WITH A SPARROW
Thath mfer is pretty defeated every other joe is flying around with 0.5kd in it lmao
6:33 The hopes for Naval reworked is dead.
f15j op
Correct me If I am wrong but the R27ER has better flight characteristics than the first Aim120. They should have give the F15a two aim120A.
The real f15a couldn’t carry the aim-120, and even if they do give it 2 aim-120s it would be an unrealistic upgrade and limiting it to 2 would set a bad balancing precedent
@kyomcmushy Couldn't the F15A MSIP launch AIM-120? I thought the version ingame is a MSIP version because of the flares
Wait, so the F15 we have in game rn is not the F15a, but the F15 MSIP??? Just so they could give it flairs, but keep all the other stats of the F15a? Bro wtf thats messed up, they be lying and manipulating us.
@@WirableCrown1 Yeah, the major nations is actually on the better end. Gajin keeps giving china tech tree bs, such as the VT4-A1 with 550KE on frontal upper plate, 577pen with 7 sec reload, 2nd generation two plane speed and completely sub par performances in basically everything and they simply say "Not enough info" and that is in 12.3. They're delusional with top tier vehicles.
Also F5C 6:05 rip
the no HMD and aim7M's make me not wanna play
W
"the undefeated" jet only shot down MiG21SP and Su-17s, and it got set on fire and inutilized by a MiG21's gun once, they spend over ten million dollars to put the aircraft back in the air. Why doesn't it count like a defeat?
U.S. F-15A has been pissing me off. It rips wings constantly, No HMD is a big disadvantage compared to all the other jets you fight having it.. AIM-9L's stock make me want to die. Aim-7M's troll hard for no real reason
Clicked so fast there’s no view and 0 likes
I tried, too bad I’m a lil late
I hate the f-15 so much it is a pain to fly, the missiles suck compared to it's counterparts and the radar just doesn't lock what you want it to lock it loves to lock on to a random tree 2 lightyears away. In my opinion it's not worth grinding out the US tech tree since the Russian R-27 family of missiles just dominate the higher tiers.
Joob I cant play war thunder now because it soo slow to download and take forever 🙁🙁
AAM-3 says it has IRCCM... is it AIM9M style or R73/Magic2 style?
EDIT: the 6:25 part makes me thing it's the Aim-9M style... Alrighty then.
Aam3 is a copy paste of aim9m exactly with less drag
@@kevinfranklin7913no that was it on dev server they changed it
That F-16 look like he fooled it momentarily, but then turned away from the missile on the vector it was going and it reaccquired
@@kevinfranklin7913 no it isn't. Its heavier, has a slightly stronger engine, has a longer burn time, has more explosive mass, has a higher track rate and a higher gimbal limit. its not a copy paste at all.
its the Seeker shut off type, same as 9M. although it should have a UV channel aswell, which would make it even harder to flare.
Is F14A still worth it?
no
no it’s dogshit
Not really, it's weaponry and flight performance are really not even close to what it faces currently. Though you should still research it because later after the F-14s F-18 will be added which will probably be a great plane(don't think that it will be meta but definitely fun to play)
depends, in a downtier its pretty funny to spam sparrows or trolling with phoenixes in general
Since they get the er we should get the amraam
massive skill issue
@@imlivinginyourceiling I mean, why do the russians have a 1990s missle but not the Us
@@VideoSmashers the amraam has a 60+km range and active radar homing, while most nations are stuck with skyflashes. its a skill issue for us mains basically
@@imlivinginyourceiling most nato countries use the amraam. So it's not just the Us. Just russian mains crying.
Whats the keybind called to drop pilons i cannot find it
jettison weapons i think,
@@FlyingPanda150 it was yeah thanks dude!
Aim-7 Is just broken, near useless, he can even miss bots...
God bless you, may the lord jesus help you in that grind 😁
Helooooooooooooooooooooooo
All f15 got gbu8 now, and su27/j11 not, great.
Every Grippen player has like 85% winraemte. Kinda cringe
i have 38 games in the gripen and have won 36 of them lol
@@_Joob ikr it's so stupid how op that thing is, It's so easy, i can get 80% with my dik in my hand and then struggle to get 60% with the F15 💀
clickbait title, i defeated one!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Crazy how the ER/ET is in the game but the AIM-120A isn’t. That’s a power creep we’ve dealt with for over a year. Literally have to handicap NATO this Russian propaganda simulator. Oh but when the AMRAAM is added it will be an early version and Flankers will get R-77 sure
Bro amraams will shit all over R-27s, now THAT would be powercreep if the Russians didn't get an active homing missile. If the amraam is gunna be added, the Russians need the R-27EA.
What is this nato cope, the r27 is a fox 1 the aim120 is a fox3.
@@hansloyalitat9774tell me you main soviets without telling me you main soviets
@@ArcticWipeout the r27 still beats the basic aim120’s in range and speed, just say you want Russia to win
@@hansloyalitat9774 what a Russian cope. R27er is the best missile in the game with no counter (the amraam)
I’m saying the n-word
how the fuck is the F-15 more maneuverable then the Su-27? XD so unrealistic
F15 FLIGHT MODEL IS OVERPERFORMING SIGNIFICANTLY. You can keep pulling like over 20 degrees AoA and easily maintain 500-600 kmh. This is stupid energy retention. not even f16 (ment to be the best ratefighter) can`t do that. My point is you can`t have both superior 2 and 1 circle performance on one single plane. You can say that SU-27 is still better in 1 circle. Well, just watch the begining of the video. Flanker can win in first couple of turns against the f15 and then 15 starts running circles around 27s or 29s. In 2 circle 27 don`t have a chance. That makes this thing is just unfair in the game where things are ment to be at least somehow balanced.
I don`t really like that US got already 2 broken planes (f16 that pulls inhuman Gs and and now the F15 that does not lose speed in turns). The only good things about soviet jets are r73 and r27er and good first turn performance. You can hug the ground and R27ER is now not a threat to you. You can preflare the r73 and now it is flarable. And you can avoid the first turn of these jets. After that mig29 is a easy kill. Su27 might be a little harder, but again, watch the begining of the video. Joob didn`t brake a sweat to kill the flanker.
I think that competition is good for the game.
And one last things. Those couple of jets are getting AIM120s pretty soon. Each can carry more than 6 of those missiles. AMRAAMS might get a smokeless motor. That mean no smoke at all in this game. So in ground RB and in SIM it won`t be visible at all. If this happens im gonna leave top tier jets I suppose.
I feel like not adding the AMRAAMs or just not giving the f15A the performance it needs just so another vehicle to get the opposite of what the f15a gets rn. It is so unfortunate for the people that have been waiting for it.