UK Bad Drivers & Driving Fails Compilation | UK Car Crashes Dashcam Caught (w/ Commentary) #62
Вставка
- Опубліковано 25 сер 2024
- ⭐This video featuring driving fails, instant karma, close call, road rage, hit and run, car crashes, good drivers, bad drivers, and many more... This video can be utilized as a learning tool, so the viewers can learn from other mistakes, not their own.
*Driving safely should be your number one concern behind the wheel. Following these defensive driving tips from our videos to improve your own road safety.
⭐Ruby Dashcam Academy provides actual footage of road incidents captured on dash cams. There's a story-line & our own unique contributions (TEXT COMMENTARY & VOICE-OVER) throughout the video. We have also added the special editing effects, trimming, zooming, etc with the footage throughout the compilation. This whole process required our 3-5 days for producing a video.
⭐These videos with own unique contributions can be used as an educational and informative resource for viewers to analyze and evaluate situations, stay alert and get out of a potentially dangerous situation on the road in the future.
⭐Visit our official website for defensive driving tips: rubydashcamaca...
⭐ALL VIDEOS USED WITH LICENSING AGREEMENT FROM COPYRIGHT OWNER!
If we made a mistake or you just want to remove your clip, please let us know here: hannahbruntnell114@gmail.com
⭐Submit your clip for the feature here: rubydashcamaca...
---------
Thank you for watching and stay safe!
#ukdashcam #ukcarcrashes #baddrivers #drivingfails
Common sense tells you not to try and occupy the space that's about to be occupied by a truck as in clip 14. The truck is already making a wide turn and needs that lane - even though he was stationary at the time of the lights changing green. Regardless of the so called right of way, the Polo driver should've held back, while the truck driver was pre-occupied by the traffic moving infront of him , which was just long enough in this instance for the Polo to enter his blind spot. For me, the Polo driver did not read the road.
Totally agree, so many people quote the highway code verbatim when there is an accident but every vehicle , every road, every incident is unique and common sense prevails, never ever drive yourself into trouble.
Just so you know, that ‘rubber wheel’ is what we call a tyre…
and he knew that there was no damage done to his car but still went to the cops to report it . He sounds more like a cyclist than a level headed motorist .
Yep, lucky you had that dash cam to see which car caused no damage to yours! What an arse.
It REALLY annoys me when people proudly proclaim they caught an accident on their dash cam, then they fuck off from the scene and don't offer the footage to either party!? 😡
5:44 in response to the text, the lorry had right of way, it was clearing the junction, both the white car and the cammer should have waited at the lights for it to clear before crossing
Exactly, green means go 'if it's clear'. The junction wasn't clear so the cars approaching the lorry should have held back.
@@yamyamdashcamdoesn’t that also apply to the lorry when getting themself in that position in the first place?
@@sinista.productions it seems theres 2 lights, a set for the junction and a set for the crossing after the junction
3:38 that’s my pet peeve too, directional arrows not further back in a lane making it easier to get into the correct lane.
#6 seems like a rare unfortunate case where they just seemed to want the same thing at the same time, whilst not actually doing anything wrong.
4:10 Been thinking about this. Just because they neither party came to a stop doesn't mean both parties are liable. If some one was REALLY gunning it, then that also reduces the time the proper speed car has to come to a stop. Just something to consider.
True if one would have stopped, but both are still moving during the collision. You need to be able to stop within half the distance you can see for this very reason.
5:52 what an absolute prat in the white car.
I wonder why a lot of these cammers never stop to offer their footage when they've witnessed an accident?
Exactly I’d drop them the footage and go
6:09 the blue car was nearly part of a crash too haha
#14 common sense (or a single brain cell) would dictate you let the big lorry with limited viewing access complete the manoeuvre.... But hey that's the world we live in now 'Me go first, no care for other people'
While I would do exactly what you've suggested, based on what we can see in this video, I'd have to say this was completely the HGV drivers fault. He clearly didn't have the time or space to make the turn so with him knowing he needs plenty of space, why is he where he is? IMO, this HGV driver is just like most I come across on the roads, they're in a huge vehicle so they'll do exactly what they want or have a tantrum when you don't allow them! Had the HGV driver simply waited for the next green light, he would have had all the road to manoeuvre because cars wouldn't have been going through a green light from the other direction.
Completely ignored the rule of "Never enter a junction unless your exit is clear"
Even if no cars were at the lights the HGV still would be too long to fully get around and into lane so your claim is redundant. Its the white golfs fault as its obvious what the truck was going to do.
@@DrQupax polo
What i'm seeing in the comments is "do not enter a junction until your exit is clear........... unless you're a lorry and you can do what you want". Erm........
#7. “I looked Right, but didn’t expect anything coming from the left.” Because you didn’t look left as well as right before emerging out of a junction.
#14. The cammer nor the white car should have set off as the road ahead wasn’t clear and should have waited till the LGV had finished turning, never cross the stop line unless your exit from the junction is clear.
According to your last point the lorry shouldn't have been in the junction in the first place, but I agree that pulling straight infront of a heavy like that makes you a total numpty
@@Lilith-Rose I agree, but the cammer and especially the white car made the situation 100 times worse. Two wrongs, doesn’t put it right.
You never enter a yellow grid / box unless exit is clear, many junctions near me you have to enter the juntion to be able to see if it is clear down your exit!
If it's not clear, you sit in the junction positioned to not impeed the other traffic until it is clear.
@@Lilith-Rose Depends if there is s single set of pedestrian lights on the other side, there are several junctions in London especially on the A4 where you have to watch not only the traffic sequence for vehicles etc but also the pedestrian sequence just past those lights and they are also box junctions.
They are also camera fitted so they either catch you for jumping the lights and ignoring the red sequence on the pedestrian crossing or get you for sitting in the box junction.
@2:27 Always look both ways when pulling out, unless you think that no one has ever been on the wrong side of the road before, not even bicycles or pedestrians.
If you think that can happen (as the video demonstrates) then you ALWAYS look both ways before pulling out.
1.35 An Ashley Niel moment got to be in front of the learner no matter what.
Neal
@@LegendEaterPSR nob
@@LegendEaterPSR Oh crap he will never give my comments a like again.
@@rustydusty2992 You know you can edit your comments to correct the mistake right?
2.15 But thats why you look both ways twice, could have been blues and 2s and they would have been going even faster possibly. Give way from whichever direction.
#14 is just horrific. The fuel prices!
It’s pure greed and profiteering
@1:21 Nasty kerbed wheel. Hope the Jaguar driver stopped because they are absolutely liable for that damage to the front alloy wheel of the Vauxhall where it gouged the kerb 🤬 In fact that kind of kerbage could knock out the geometry quite easily as well. SMH...
6:32 my spider senses tell me that the mini was in the wrong here.
Doesn't the red vw up have to give way to the main road? It's pulling out of a side road.
That's how I think it should be, but I don't think it's that simple. The VW has to give way to traffic on the main road, but not sure how much the Mini being on the wrong side will sway things with insurance, probably 50/50 is my guess as someone with no real knowledge on insurance claims.
@Mhlikescars I would say that it's mostly the vw Up driver at fault, pulling out onto a main road, obviously didn't look both ways or couldn't see the mini and pulled into it's path. It's not an offence to drive on the wrong side of the road. Ill advised on this occasion most certainly.
The Mini is absolutely at fault here!! It is impatiently overtaking the stationary traffic, I suspect so it can turn right up ahead. It's on the WRONG side of the road lol. The yellow box junction is there for the precise purpose of allowing cars to pull out and merge with the main road traffic. If the yellow box junction wasn't there then the adjoining road would have utterly horrific prospects of pulling out. Nobody in their right mind would look right there; you only need look left to see what's coming (assuming you're turning right, like the VW did). You would never in a million years expect a vehicle to be coming the wrong way down the road from the right.
Both at fault. One should be sure it's clear to pull out and the other isn't a motorcycle and must not be filtering. Or maybe it's just the mini fault as it's not supposed to even be there.
Its a no brainer for clip 14. The lorry was in the junction, the car should have given room for him to complete his turn, so the car is at fault. Although you could argue the lorry should not have entered that junction in the first place as his entry was not clear but you can't always be sure that some idiot will stop at a green light and bloCK your way
Clip 14,neither the Clio nor the cam car should have moved until the lorry was clear. It may not be a box, but that doesn't give indelible rights to just block the junction. You can't tell until after the incident that the traffic beyond the junction is going to move. If you don't know for sure you can't clear, don't enter.
2:15: The reason as to why I always check left even when turning left at a junction.
Same here.
Wait people don't check both ways even when turning left?
@@Nonprofitgenie unfortunately no. Seen some big smashes as a result.
@ 2:10, it would have been the camera cars fault. Give way means give way to ALL traffic on the major road, overtaking car was unwise but not illegal.
6:22 the clown in the mini!
Clip 12 - it would help if people looked further down the road than the front of their car - as well as moderating their speed! Clip 13 - fast car, slow reactions!
7:00 that lookas like Watford to me. :)
5:54 Bullshit there was no one at fault!! You NEVER overtake a turning Lorry like that for that exact reason, they need room for their massive turning circle.
3:35 the right turn arrow has to be that close to the junction because if it were any further away it would mean turn right into the side street, also it's technically one lane until the lane dividers start.
And 99% of the drivers in these lanes knows full well that it's a turn right only lane as they've lived there their whole lives!
@@petersylvester2905 In the video you can see the paint used to show a go ahead arrow, so my bet is it recently changed
reminds me of the millbrook roundabout in Southampton by KFC/McDonalds. If you come from city centre, to come off the 3rd exit you use the middle lane. It filters you to the left by the time you get to the turn off. 99% the drivers use the outside lane, then push across at the lights. The road had lines that guide you to the exits, so you cant make a mistake. And if you do, its a giant round-a-bout, just go around again.
the road is actually two lanes down to this point and it happens so frequently it is ridiculous.
@@JinxyBells The centre line stops at the bus stop and doesn't start again until where we see it, at least from the Google Streetview.
2:10 You should always check both ways before pulling out of a side road.
5:50 The truck is already in the junction waiting to clear. Only a total asshat would have tried to pull what the white car did. He just didnt want to get stuck behind in the traffic and tried to get in front, failed appallingly, and ended up stuck on the side of the road. White car at fault, no doubt.
2:09 the road lines say give way, this means both ways. that nutter could have been a fire engine . We know he was wrong but you need to LOOK and give way
For people with foggy windows leave the air intake on fresh air only…. DO NOT CLOSE the system and recycle the air your breath causes condensation on windows.
Great selection
2.50 Yep enough cant be said for keeping a good gap.
6:00, I will blame the car, because the car can wait. It's lorry for God's sake
02:07 onwards sad to say had you collided with that car on the wrong side of the road it would have been your fault as you had exited the junction in crossing the Give Way without being sure that traffic was clear in BOTH directions and not just to your right hand side.
That point has been argued before and when you join onto a road where you have to give way or stop you should always check to your right and to your left for oncoming vehicles
50 seconds in… ‘Liverpool’? That’s the Formby Bypass at Woodvale- a good 20 miles outside of Liverpool. Think someone’s GPS is having an off day.
#1 if there’s no damage, legally there’s no accident or stop and report. Yes, they should have checked because they obviously wouldn’t have known there wasn’t any damage, but that’s why the police won’t have done anything.
At 6 mins the white car is being driven by a moron, the lorry is clearly turning and about to fill that space.
3:06 #10 completely agree and I find Liverpool one of the worst places for this. On a side note why on earth is the cammer right up the arse of that Kia?!
7:52 Safe and effective. Passed out
driving through a red light a severe beating.
2:21 I hate idiots who stop traffic to wave people across. So dangerous. They’re also invariably terrible drivers who haven’t a clue about the HC.
1.55 lack of checking the blind spot there but peripheral vision should have picked up lorry indicating.
2:18 Well, you bloody well should have. Overtaking is a thing, you know.
People like the cammer at #14 are the worst kind of people. 'shall I stop and share this footage with those involved to help find who's at fault?'
'Naahh fk that. Instead, I'll take it home and spend 20 minutes sending it to UA-cam for my 15 seconds of fame' 🤢
#14 - who would be at fault here?! really? keep the crossing clear until it is clear to pass through - the lorry was already in said space when the moron in the white car decided to ignore everything and just go.
Edit: why in the hell did the cammer not stop as required by law either!?
6:19 I’m pretty sure the law states that if you are stuck in the intersection at lights you have right of way to get clear. Yes you also shouldn’t move unless it’s clear but something may have happened to stop him. There are lights at a junction near me that change quickly and if you are not use to them you get stuck in the intersection as it’s caused a queue to back up.
You never have "right of way" as the concept does not exist. The lorry shouldn't be entering a junction that he couldn't clear.
@@LegendEaterPSR yes yes but you know exactly what I mean and the lorry didn’t enter it was already in the junction. You don’t just keep going at bollards and hope they go down in time.
Exactly that (aside from legal terms)! Doesn't matter if the lorry entered illegally when traffic already was backed up or came to an unexpected stop in the intersection. It's a small infraction anyways. But the car entering before it was clear to do so, with cross traffic still there right in front and waiting to clear... well, obviously has to take most of the blame. Call it right of way, or priority, or whatever else, the lorry has more right to clear the intersection first, than the car has to enter with the lorry still there. One wrong from someone else doesn't allow you to do one your own, and green doesn't mean just gun it no matter what's in the way.
@@ChaseWilder if it was already in the junction then it should have been able to clear it. Otherwise it shouldn't have entered it. Since it didn't clear it, it couldn't clear it. Basically when you look forwards, if there's not enough space for your back end to not be in the way of the junction when you come to a stop, you shouldn't even move. If the lights change while you're moving, you keep moving. You don't stop.
No the law states you shouldn't enter it if you cannot safely exit it. truck shouldn't have been there at all
At 3:05 the junction with a right turn only lane . It's a well known junction and the people coming down the outside know full well it's a right turn only lane . They think their time is more important than yours and won't queue up
Not necessarily. I'd know as I'm local but if you don't know the roads it's a nightmare because some of the junctions the right lane is for straight on and turn right, and the left lane is for turning left only. But like the text says, there's no signage and you don't know which lane to be in until you reach the junction and see the arrows on the road surface. As Liverpool has no proper urban motorways into the city all the major routes into and out of the centre are dual lane roads like this with lots of junctions, and visitors to the city unfamiliar with the roads often find themselves in the wrong lane.
I don't know it, neither do millions of others...
With #12, I cant see why more people can just use their horns especially around country road blind spots, far too many people use it for the wrong reason!
#6 🤦🏽♀️ the cammer or someone could have at least beeped to let both drivers know what was about to happen
3:05 how close do you need to be? I get people do this to me all the time on my bike and they haven't got a clue that a)all I can see is them in my mirror and nothing else going on behind me and, b)if they do get shunted, there's a good chance I get sandwiched and a trip to hospital.
3:35 people know full well what they are doing at junctions like this. Get it all the time when they just want to get ahead and now t wait in the queue like the rest of us.
Or they aren't familiar with the road and made a genuine mistake? There's a few of them near me that you have to be in the right lane to go ahead, which there's no way to know unless you can see the road markings or you know the area, and sadly the road is easily covered by cars.
#11 the crash might have been avoided if the cammer had heeded the SLOW warning on the road and not increased speed!
So you're defending the car that pulled out? I couldn't care less if it had RICE PUDDING painted on the road, the car pulled out with potentially fatal consequences!!! Let's just drive everywhere slow then shall we?
Okay I have a question or #12 , since i'm not in the UK and have never encountered roads that is that TINY, how does one get through if there's another car coming your way?
Normally there are area built into the side of the road at various places to pull over to allow cars to get past you but they aren't all over the place. In reality one person would have to reverse back the way they came until there is a place they can pull over.
@@ChrisPye999 oh wow that's tricky! Here in Indonesia we do have narrow roads but there's always some room on the sides to squeeze both cars through. Either some tiny grass field or someone's driveway. Thanks for the thorough explanation!
Drive sensibly to a speed that matches your ability to see and to stop safely, also be the one who reverses rather than face out the car in front of you but always reverse under hazards to warn anyone approaching you from behind that you are moving that way.
Being curteous doesn't cost you a thing
@@darreng745 Personally I'd go with whoever is closer to a spot they can pull over should reverse but that requires a bit of cooperation. I don't want to be reversing 200 metres back the way I came if there's a spot the other car can pull over 20 metres behind them.
5:52: The fault of the Volkswagen driver, they should have let the lorry complete the manoeuvre before continuing through the green light.
The standing still not moving at all maneuver?
Traffic is in front of it. It can't levitate
4.24 And thats kids is how i met your mother
Hi! Subscribed
6.09 - lorry didn't have enough room to clear. Should have waited at his light to leave lane clear. White car has a silly driver though
Don't know that junction, but it looks like pedestrian lights at the junction badly timed: they were still showing red when the main junction went green. Without prior video we cannot say when the pedestruan lights went red relative to the other direction, particularly for the lorry turning left. If they go red as the other way goes green, there is no way that lorry could wait for its exit to be clear as it never would be.
Clip 1. Also proof that the [police no longer want to 'police' in this country unless it is for a non-crime.
no. 14: Unfortunately the lorry driver will get part of the blame, but the car will get the most, obviously. Because the lorry did in fact have right of way, as he was first in the intersection and the car driver entered before it was clear to go and caused the accident this way. A green light doesn't mean you can just go. You still have to take care about not blocking off traffic or endangering anyone, etc.
And it doesn't matter if the lorry driver could have known that he wouldn't be able to clear the intersection either, or if he unexpectedly came to a stop. Even if he did it wrongly and entered with already seeing that he shouldn't have, he was there already when the car decided to not wait and entered the intersection illegally.
The lorry driver however will get part of the blame because he started to drive without a clear way and hit the car - unfortunately I say, because morally he isn't to blame and couldn't have seen the car at all. But with a good lawyer maybe he gets no blame. It's literally as some cases where byciclists or pedestrians decided to come from the side and stand directly in the blind spot of a turning lorry, in a way that the driver never was able to see even a glimpse of them appearing anywhere, driving over them, not getting blamed in the end.
Is that your comment about the quasqai that ignored the right turn arrows on Picton Road? there are 2 of them on the approach the 1st one at the exact point it becomes 2 lanes, do yourself a favour and look at junctions on maps before spouting bollocks
2:49 Governments Death motorways strike again☠☠
Around 6:05 you show a slow crash between a lorry and a small car. In Ontario Canada, you are not supposed to enter an intersection if myou don't know you can clear it before the light turns red; therefore, the lorry shouldn't have stopped there and is at fault. Also, you're not supposed to block an intersection (Emergency vehicles can't get through), so the lorry is in the wrong even if the U.K. doesn't have the first law.
Whilst I don't disagree, if I was driving the white car I'd think I might just hold back this massive lorry looks like he needs some room.
That’s not the case in the UK though. We don’t know how the circumstances of the hold up but the Highway Code clearly states the white car needs to allow the junction to clear. It is he that should have waited and not blindly driven into the blind spot.
@@roppa789 but also the lorry shouldn't have been sat stationary in the junction to begin with. Not saying trying to sneak past it was a good idea, but it shouldn't have been there. Clearing junctions applies to all vehicles in all directions and there was no reason for the lorry to just stop there and randomly start driving again.
At least the lorry pulled over in area where there was plenty of room for vehicles to pass and I would have just waited for lorry to move and never done what the white car did.
we have that law here. and its listed as MUST in the highway code for both box junctions and regular light controlled ones so it is law. there's always enough breaking it that if you also obeyed it you would go nowhere.
Nice click bait title.
🤔 ............... Women are just amazing drivers🤣🤣🤣
Seems most of these accidents would have been avoided if people didn't speed and use a bit of consideration for each other. Also women drivers shouldn't assume they are always right.
#16 - The guy didn't look to see if there was anyone not stopping, before he pulled out.
imagine blaming the driver when he had a green light in front of him
White BMW : check
Trainers : check
Sweatpants : check
Fake Canada goose jacket : check
CHAV ALERT !
Snob alert
Entitled twat alert.
4.15 Not only that but what a lot of motorist think is that the 2 seconds is for stopping as well it's not it's just the thinking distance in which to stop and reaction time only not even putting your foot on the brake comes into that first 2 seconds so even with nothing in front of them going down this lane they think that 2 seconds vision is enough when it's not.
3.20 Yes but signs cost money but if you look there is a junction to the right just before the traffic light so the could not have it before that.
#14 the white car. He should have let the lorry finish his manoeuvre onto road. Plain ignorance going in front of him whether he was in the right or not
He'd need to have been moving to finish it. He was stationary.
#7 (2:14) Even though the other driver was in the wrong for overtaking when there is a junction, you were more in the wrong by not looking left. You are the one joining the road, and the onus is on you to check it's clear. Had the exact same thing happen to a work colleague, he pulled out while only looking right and hit an overtaking vehicle. Was found 100% at fault, as would you be.
Even if he had checked, the speed at which the car was approaching would have meant he was not clear to the cammer at the time of pulling out.
Absolutely. In this case is was an idiot driver, but could have easily been a police car, ambulance etc.
@@shm5547 It blows my mind that people pull out while only looking right. There could be anything there, as you say emergency services, children, a horse, deer, overtaking vehicle or hot air balloon.
Look right, left, then right again is how I was taught.
Not sure when the first clip was recorded - but that number plate does not exist with DVLA as the time I typed this
Why are you spending your time searching random cars number plates?😂
@@molly26189 why does anyone spend their time doing anything?
@@mydogeatspuke Because often you don't have a choice, that's life buddy.
@@molly26189 everyone has a choice lmao. And their choice is to look up number plates. My point was that people do things because they WANT TO. Because they CAN. Why not? Lol don't have a choice hahahahahaha. Fool.
No. 11 3:43 passes a junction warning sign, a slow sign, then gets visual for several seconds that there's a vehicle waiting to pull out - yet doesn't moderate approach speed at all! There's a lot of blame there on the cammer for that collision.
Are you red car driver?
@@paulshuttleworth6261 nope, just saying there's a reason warning signs and slow markings are there, they are not to be ignored. If you read the very first bit of the Highway Code, it states the rules do not give you right of way in all circumstances - if you can avoid a collision you must do so.
The cammer was truly negligent here, totally ignoring the risk posed by a vehicle trying to emerge with poor visibility. The standard of their driving fell well below that of a competent motorist.
@@paulshuttleworth6261 just calculated their approach speed - it was around 63mph. That's clearly far too fast on a damp road. The poor driver trying to emerge didn't stand a chance, visibility was very bad due to the overgrown hedgerow.
Here we go again lol. So you think that despite the junction warning sign and 'slow' road marking that the waiting car is within its rights to pull out onto a main road when a car is approaching at speed??? Your defence of drivers in the wrong is quite worrying tbh. The driver of the car pulling out should, at the very least, be prosecuted for driving without due care and attention. Why oh why did they pull out??? They've either got bad eyesight or didn't look. And despite the overgrown hedgerow, it could've edged out slightly further than it did without risking a collision. It simply held back and then just went for it. It was an APPALLING manoeuvre!!!
@@Markyboy699 go look at rule 146. Cammer made a lot of mistakes: where there are junctions, be prepared for road users emerging
6:00 To answer your question... The lorry driver shouldn't have started his manoeuvre (before we joined the clip) if he wasn't sure he'd have time to complete it. He's aware he's got a long vehicle, he should never have got himself trapped in that situation.
Neither should the cammer and the polo. The junction wasn't clear, there was nowhere for them to go.
Neither should the car driver try to squeeze where they know the lorry driver can't see them. Though I do agree drivers should not even queue onto any intersection if they cannot clear it. 1:15 and 6:25 are more examples of such poor participation.
He might not have any other way to go trough that Intersection.
He shouldn't have... However does that automatically mean that you then squeeze past a HGV when you know they are turning? No, obviously not.
Everyone involved in that clip was just.....shit.
Seen half of these before?
1.50car was turn on side signal 1-2 sec after lorry driver,and move straight to the lorry blind spot. Lane of right side lorry was clean before he's turn on signal.
6:03 the lorry was at fault as he shouldn't have been that far forward. What's the rule? "Never enter a junction unless your exit is clear"
Whilst i can see your argument and agree . The lorry is there any normal driver would think there is a big lorry here let's give him a bit of space.
@@martinr9109 Very true. The car driver was a bit of a dick
@@martinr9109 how you going to give a stationary vehicle partially blocking a junction space though? You don't expect them to randomly start moving again. They're on a red. If the lorry was in the middle of making a turn then yeah, hold back. But it was stopped. It's reasonable to assume the driver was caught out and is waiting for the next green and so it's safe to pass.
its actually a MUST NEVER. that rule is a law. that goes broken and un prosecuted by too many cretins making traffic worse for all of us
@@mydogeatspuke well I don't drive forward or drive a bit forward and see a big lorry moving. I can't believe I'm answering this question.
#7 - no need for the cammer to try and justify themselves there - that was totally the fault of the car overtaking on the junction. That sort of driving boils my piss. Impatient and dangerous.
5:55 what do you mean who was at fault ? Obviously the car as it should left the lorry clear the road ... ffs
1.00 This also possibly occured because of the mentality you have to be in the outside lane no matter what stemming from extremly bad lane discipline in this country, our motorways and dual carraige ways would flow so much better if much more enforcement was on hand.
6:00 polos fault, knew the lorry would need to swing to get around and as far as I’m concerned knowingly put themselves on a stupid and blind spot.
not that simple though si it. lorry shouldn't have been there (its a law not to enter unless you can exit) he knew that he should have been more aware if he was gona move. so both belong to the stupid's clan
@@Gazzxy yes gazzy it is, no yellow box, not a roundabout.
You’re commenting a few times and responding to me on a few of these and it’s becoming apparent you have no idea what you’re talking about and clearly have a lack of observation skills.
@@Mr_OoOsH its rule 176 junctions controlled by traffic lights. you dont need to crack on with the insults you come off the same dude..
@@Mr_OoOsH and what lack of observations skill your the one defending EXATLY that..
@@Gazzxy but seeing as that junction has a left filter arrow (you can see both sets of lights) the lorry was well within the law….100% the stupid driver of the polo put himself in the blind spot of a lorry he knew would need to encroach that lane to make the corner….it does not matter which way you cut it in this case the polo was stupid.
I’m tired of you.
#12 Cammer's fault.Driving far too fast. The mini seemed to be going at a sensible low speed.
Are you the Mini driver?
dunno about that... looks to me like if the mini hadnt tried to turn the wheel too, they might have actually stayed on the road, where the grip is, and might have stopped.
Both at fault.
2:52 what's the odds on that song 'wasn't me' playing whilst that driver in front was being a tit 😂
Speaking of songs playing; I was expecting more carnage at 2:40 😀
Fell asleep watching this, won't be subscribing.
Both car drivers, everybody thinks green means go, it doesn’t, it means go if the way is clear. Read The Highway Code.
Ok in that case I'll just do what I want, when I want on the roads then. Run red lights. Pull out on people. Wreak havoc. Because it's up to the other people to see me coming and get out the way 😂
6:10 car at fault lorry is working which always takes precedence over non commercial vehicles.
Hahahaha what????
@@mydogeatspuke Paid work always takes precendence over any other activity. otherwise everything else fails.