New images from Odysseus moon lander released
Вставка
- Опубліковано 27 лют 2024
- Intuitive Machines released new images from the Odysseus lander on Wednesday after announcing plans to power down the spacecraft during a news conference with NASA. The lander tipped over to its side on Friday after its historic landing on the lunar surface. Derrick Pitts, the chief astronomer at The Franklin Institute, joins CBS News with a look at what experts are calling a successful mission.
CBS News Streaming Network is the premier 24/7 anchored streaming news service from CBS News and Stations, available free to everyone with access to the Internet. The CBS News Streaming Network is your destination for breaking news, live events and original reporting locally, nationally and around the globe. Launched in November 2014 as CBSN, the CBS News Streaming Network is available live in 91 countries and on 30 digital platforms and apps, as well as on CBSNews.com and Paramount+.
Subscribe to the CBS News UA-cam channel: / cbsnews
Watch CBS News: cbsnews.com/live/
Download the CBS News app: cbsnews.com/mobile/
Follow CBS News on Instagram: / cbsnews
Like CBS News on Facebook: / cbsnews
Follow CBS News on Twitter: / cbsnews
Subscribe to our newsletters: cbsnews.com/newsletters/
Try Paramount+ free: paramountplus.com/?ftag=PPM-0...
For video licensing inquiries, contact: licensing@veritone.com
2024 and we couldn’t get a video of the landing? These pics look like they filmed small models in a studio.😂
What?! Are you saying they may not have landed on the moon?😢
It costs 300 dollars to send an apple to a space station. It's expensive to include heavy cameras. Just be amazed instead of complaining.
@@thehoardedgrotto8521 we spend 65 billion in taxes every year to these liars, and they couldn’t send a regular camera up into space. Shill much?
The laws of physics haven't changed just because it's 2024.
Seanwells26 Your a legend.Your catching on to the lies and con that is NASA!!!!
Hi. Where’s the landing footage of eagle eye cam?
Pity the lander didn’t have as much spin ability as the CEO
Houston, we have a problem.
How many times are they gonna show that unnecessary cgi/simulation landing. Show us the real video and landing
There isn't any
Don't have any all fake
I don’t see big deal we’ve supposedly landed on moon already putting a flag on it.
ZERO excuse for not having uninterrupted video showing multiple angles from takeoff to touchdown.@@JuanMartinez-df1lc
@@Iamzombiehunter what a coincidence lol
It must have a really long selfie 🤳 stick to get that landing shot
In Dec 2020, China's Chang-5 lunar lander safely landed on the moon. Then it automatically sampled of 3.8 pounds (1,731 grams) of lunar rocks. Then it succesfully lifted off and rocketed the samples safely back to Earth. I wonder if USA/NASA is able to perform such mission at this stage.
Amazing how after 50+ years our scientists and engineers are still designing lunar modules utilizing nothing more than gold aluminum foil, curtain rods, plywood and other converted household items! 😂
On Earth, people fight to feed themselves and their children. With enough food to feed everyone, 690 million people go to bed hungry, including 189.2 million in India. Malnutrition caused 69 per cent of child deaths in India in 2019-20.
Fifty years ago with slide rules did better. Nice media stunt.
Between 1958 to 1965, there had been 15 failed American uncrewed moon missions. Thanks for your failed comment stunt. Keep trying!
Why so little cameras and such bad footage?
why this pictures are in so low quality and resolution?? Dont have better cameras? why?
the one of it landing is in very good quality
sadly that good camera seems to be the side they fell onto
Because it's all fake, cgi, nobody can land on a light source, the entire world has been deceived, including myself at one point, back in 1969,we were taken from our classes into the gymnasium to watch that so called landing well when your a young boy or girl, your not going to doubt it, then you find out the world is run by an organisation called freemasonry, you will find out a lot of things we were told, are actually fabricated, made up, sad world we all live in, one big lie, the majority cannot see , there all orogrammed
It’s not actually a priority
It's fake.
“The landing gear did what it’s supposed to”
*shows image of landing gear breaking apart*
Yes. It took the brunt of the landing - like it’s supposed to
I saw rocks blown off by rocket engine knocked off some of the legs.
Let's see you do better, smart guy.
@Doctordog127 easy flat earther
@@simonsong1743 I saw you on the side of the road trying to figure out a flat tire..
Interesting how no one can actually say “While this was not a completely successful attempt to land on the moon…”
It broke a leg and tipped over, which was not a perfect landing, but a successful mission that completed all of its objectives. Same as if SpaceX do an oopsie and make a big hole in a barge instead of a soft landing - if the payload made it to orbit, the primary mission was still a success.
It's a cropped picture imagine that
There's already all kinds of infrastructure and sht up there. Promise.
These guys worked with all these different people and noone suggested making the lander wider than it is tall, so it wouldn't be so easy to tip over?
Of course it was suggested. See Scott Manley’s short.
"No one" is two words.
No, it would of been easier for it too topple over because the same thing would of happened. It was either a terrain navigation failure or they just got unlucky.
@@chriswarr3676 they were going sideways because someone left the safety on the laser landing instrument at launch.
@@tubecated_development yeah, they showed that on the simulation, but I thought it going sideways was part of the fight navigation.
I know it's tricky, but it'd be cool to have of these landers actually fly by one of the apollo sites at low altitude en route to its own mission, so we can take a look the state of any of the apollo descent stages. Seeing them up close would be awesome
Give it time and odds are some of the stuff will be returned for testing..
in other words ... they only were "half successful "when one of it's landing legs busted BEFORE actual touch down, causing it to fall over .... . It's more like lipstick on a pig
They completed all mission objectives. They were successful.
Space X launches almost weekly. Over 200 rockets returned and reused. Intuitive machines should be congratulated. Going to the moon and Mars is not easy
"Going to the Moon is not easy."
Riiight . . . NASA SUCCESSFULLY soft landed landed SURVEYOR 1 on the Moon's surface back in 1966 with a vertical touchdown velocity of about 3 m/s, and NASA SUCCESSFULLY soft landed a total of six Apollo Lunar Excursion Modules on the Moon' surface, starting with the Apollo 11 mission back in 1969.
Just be honest
Maybe if they looked at a Surveyor probe in a museum, they would know how that 1960s tech worked pretty well.
Lol..sure.
What happened to the special video camera that was supposed to eject right before touchdown and video landing ?????? No footage why is that
If you look at pictures of the lunar lander from 50 years ago, you can see why it would be much less likely to tip over. It was a very stable platform. Odysseus looked far less so.
Yes, too tall and top heavy, with that height the legs should have been much longer/wider. Also it would have been good to have legs designed to upright the lander if on it's side.
Odysseus had also a rough landing with too much lateral velocity and landing on a slope. In nominal conditions, it would have remained straight
@@WJV9 Can't upright the lander with the legs when the landing conditions literally ripped off two of them
yes high center of gravity!
@@benafablethe angry astronaut predicted that 😂
Where can I see all of their visual telemetry and not a few seconds on loop?
Maybe the next probe should have landing legs all around it and two rotating axises.
Maybe next time they enable the landing laser.
Maybe everything is checked many times, a stronger landing gear, not top heavy, and don’t by from lowest bidder!
I take issue with the person who said "there's no atmosphere" on the moon. So what ? You need enough fuel for the engines, Apollo missions did it, and also lifted off to moon orbit after landing.. Also the shape of the lander and/or the legs seemed wrong, seemed too easy to lead to a tip-over. Maybe the fixed price contract isn't the way ?
Design was purfect but it was assembled on Boeing's assembly line.
or did they really do it...hmmmm
In terms of difficulty, it does make landing significantly harder than popping a chute. You also need to carry that landing fuel to the moon, which means the launcher needs the fuel to carry the fuel. They just make it look easy.
@@technicalfool What made the lander tip over ?
did they bring Kubrick again?
Using words like "Exciting, Success, Celebrate" just doesn't make sense to me. To me the whole event is just one step above failure.
I understand the sentiment, but the fact that it wasn’t a failure is huge and a tribute to the team. Orbital mechanics is complicated AF.
Yes, especially when thrusters don’t work in a vacuum.
On Earth, people fight to feed themselves and their children. With enough food to feed everyone, 690 million people go to bed hungry, including 189.2 million in India. Malnutrition caused 69 per cent of child deaths in India in 2019-20.
Why, in the high technology world with 4k video, do we have an animation insread of 10 different awesome angles???
You seem to think that video-cameras = a lunar broadband network on the Moon’s South Pole?
Cameras are cameras. They don’t yet come with a dedicated chain of relay satellites orbiting the moon. NASA is working on a new tool to overcome signal disruption: a communications networking protocol called High-Rate Delay Tolerant Networking (DTN).
Why can't they get a live video broadcasted back with exponentially better technology than they had in 1969? At least until the signal stops if the South Pole is too far. @@tubecated_development
Marsians looking at that like "they still using fire" 🤦♂️
They took a time to create those amazing photos😅
Click bait, no images from the moon
We learnt from the Apollo moon missions that PR is incredibly important and not a trivial thing. This largely was a PR disaster - from the completely underwhelming and confusing countdown to the landing - to the silence and bad communications afterwards. All needs to get much slicker if they want to impress the American and world public- not an issue for science of course but issue for future missions.
The majority of the general public doesn't give a sht either way outside of the small minority of space nerds. Everyone else will care eventually but only once it has some meaning to them outside of a data stream and a handful of pictures.
The Landing is insignificant.......Apollo Missions landed Humans on the Moon 6x with 60s tech💪💪💪...But looks like it's tech in reverse🤔🤔🤔....Also showed clear ground disturbance vs the Apollo pics which showed no disturbance at all....
Those Apollo missions were a long while ago, and were built up to. It all started with impactors, then lander probes like this. Even the first crewed missions didn't land; there's a reason it took until Apollo 11 to actually do that. Not to mention that the Apollo 11 footage shows quite clear plumes of regolith being blasted out of the way during the landing, so I'm not sure what footage you were looking at.
Thinking of how in combination with gyroscopes and additional landing spikes. This could have been avoided. If you have gyroscopes detecting a faulty angle....say more than 15 degrees that only activate within 2 to 3 feet of the surface. The additional landing spikes could have deployed keeping the vehicle from tipping over. In the future i would definitely consider installing these. It could ultimately save a $100,000,000 mission
I am always fascinated by how we can all work together when it comes to space exploration. It's a wonderful thing
On Earth, people fight to feed themselves and their children. With enough food to feed everyone, 690 million people go to bed hungry, including 189.2 million in India. Malnutrition caused 69 per cent of child deaths in India in 2019-20.
Who or what was taking the pictures/ video of the landing? Was there a camera already there? LMAO I call BS just like the one in 1969!
?? Timestamp?
He sounds like a nascar driver thanking all his sponsors. Ridiculous.
Jeeze. The guy pitches this like it's some miracle breakthrough, 50+ years after NASA sent men up there over and over again and brought them all home with not a single crash, which this WAS, although luckily not too hard, as crashes go. But this one would NOT be able to come home even if it wanted to.
Show us the flag that they put on the moon
Bet this guy played ball where they don't keep score and everybody gets a participation trophy.
Compared with every recent Moon probe attempt - engine failures, landers coming in upside down, a whole set of new craters on the surface - yes they're probably ahead of the most recent bunch.
Space is hard, the moon is harder, and there's been quite some decades of knowledge lost that needs to be regained.
Esse módulo também é muito bonito! Os módulos eletrônicos são bonitos!
Mi divina reina, ¿alguna vez has escuchado de A poem by, Guillermo Hill. En UA-cam???
Seria interessante o módulo levitar por 5 segundos antes de pousar! Seria tipo um tempo de confirmação!
Pics were disappointing
Sorry, there are no hot chicks on the moon (yet).
Was the pics from Putins moon lander more impressive? 😅
@@80-80. Not sure. Never seen them. Are they?
Amazing what a dollar shop camera can do😊
Happy for us being back. Please be sure your data settings are not fiddled with. That way, you won't hit rocks and mounds (convex) where you thought you had craters (concave).
Thank you.
So much for uk being 2nd mention as partner
At the beginning, he mentions Mauritius - what part did Mauritius play, I wonder?
Signal disc positioned there, from what I have understood.
He's just mentioning random countries because he knows most Americans don't have a clue where they are!😂
It failed to land correctly and flopped over. It was NOT a successful mission.
it didnt matter all payloads worked regardless of orientation
The old moon buggy came back to life , went over and and took a leak on it... It did a great job on the flight and getting there. But this stuff was accomplished late 60s early 70s.. like what the heck???
A huge success in my opinion. Countries spend billions and decades to do this kind of stuff. KEEP GOING. MY BEST WISHES FOR YOUR COMPANY'S FUTURE
Apollo 13 said it best...a successful failure..
This is such bs.......
Congratulations guys. 🎉
Congratulations of this project which involved so many countries. Which one supplied the lander's legs? I hope we could get more info when the sun returns to light this area.
During the landing couldn't they use AI coupled with LIDAR to control the descent, including determining if the ground immediately beneath was uneven?
Can't the landing gear compensate to ensure the lander remained upright?
Excelente imagens das câmeras! Parece que os tubos dos tanques de Hélio são finos de propósito para reduzir a velocidade do gás sem ter que utilizar válvulas a mais. O próprio tubo faz essa função, bacana!
Design it like a Weeble. Remember, "Weebles wobble but they don't fall down."
1 picture and a sideways lander is nothing but a failure and a joke!
These guys messed up. They rushed, but whyyyyyyyy? Hmmm
These guys should have played more Kerbal Space Program before attempting the real thing.
Dang, I was expecting better photos.
I was expecting uninterrupted video showing multiple angles from takeoff to touchdown.
I was expecting fake photos but definitely better ones than these. I knew they would show uninterrupted videos showing multiple angles from takeoff to touchdown because the internet would destroy the inconsistencies that NASA, SpaceX, etc. has lied about. @@derp8575
The guy from intuitive sure did try and sell us that it’s not a big deal that it’s nearly fallen over. They barely landed frankly. Im not certain they are an “asset”
All the data and images and this is all they’re releasing??!?!!!?!?!?
Underwhelming.
The Sideways brothers 🇯🇵🇺🇸 How can we be sure there aren't little green cheesemakers under the south pole, trying to protect their product aging process?
They didn't have the budget to send back a clear 10kb black and white image, but they have the budget to produce endless CGI videos that don't even look as good as a video game
So there aren’t any videos of the actual trip to the moon. Instead of images”in smart angel view”.
Because it's fake.
It is amazing how the world is getting together for a greater purpose !! GREAT JOB !!
So 52 years ago, we put a space craft on the moon and had astronauts planting flags and frolicking on the moon, and now we are told to celebrate a privatised lackluster money grab effort from a private contractor that halway failed in its mission?
What did you want for 0.1% of the cost of Apollo? A micro flag with micro ‘frolicking’?
Porquê será que o trem de pouso quebrou?
50 yrs later your lander topples over ! ---do you not learn by example ?
Apollo wasn’t autopilot. Nothing much to learn there. What they could have learned from Sea Cadets or Girl Guides is to make a checklist before pressing ‘go’.
Next time hire a movie director to make it look right. Imagine all the people who are going along with this
you believe this is a ‘movie’ mistakenly directed by somebody to make it look as if it went wrong?
What’s wrong with you?
Guys why don’t you save the back slapping for IM-2? It’s right to be positive but this was not a success was it? If Surveyor could do it in 1968 (?) to have cocked up 55 years later is more than a shame? I admire what you did achieve. Your use of the onboard laser experiment was impressive but let’s hope the next mission lands in the correct orientation. Good luck guys.
How soon before we mine the moon for minerals?
@@tubecated_development precious minerals. Space is loaded with minerals.
@@tubecated_development whatever minerals that we find useful her on earth are likely to be found on the moon too. The exact minerals in the moon are unknown as of now.
@@tubecated_development you seem to have a lot of time on your hands. Wanting to argue about the mineral content of the moon is not my idea of a good time. Later.
Well. All the instruments worked. Communication was good. If we go by check lists goals. It achieved 90%. What if it landed orthogonally but nothing worked and no data. Plus, its just the first of three or four.
Geocentric are going to have so much fun with these videos. 😂
Rightfully so. Every time they pretend to land on the moon they create more skeptics.
After every cooperative success achieved together, the politics of diplomacy and selfishness started. Hoping wisdom prevails over selfishness.
They’re acting like this wasn’t a failure. An achievement - NO DOUBT. However, stop calling it a success when it’s on its side.
@@gadidakodaka we’ve already been there and left footprints and brought back soil, etc! I’m not discounting the accomplishment. Space is hard! However, normalizing failure can’t be a recipe for success. NASA needs to get its act together. I do think there’s an amazing opportunity for a partnership with government and private firms to do great things.
@@hottub2249NASA always used private companies . Over 250 were used to build the Apollo program. Did you get mad at Apollo 1? At Gemini 8? Was Apollo 10 ‘normalising failure’?
First landing 🤔
The case when failure can be showed as a success.
Derek needs to calibrate his tv voice.
It’s more than just pictures
In Orwellian Ministry of Truth's NewSpeak, Crashed is now Tipped Over.
EDIT ADDED: Definition & Meaning - Merriam-Webster
crash verb 1 b : to damage (an airplane) in landing
damage noun 1 : loss or harm resulting from injury to person, property, or reputation
newspeak noun : propagandistic language marked by euphemism, circumlocution, and the inversion of customary meanings
As for "still collecting data" an airplane's Black Box is designed to collect data before, during and after a crash.
Its still collecting data. If it crashed, that would mean it's completely destroyed. That obviously isn't the case.
After 50 years they decided to make a top-heavy lander on PVC legs.
First time to the moon.congrates
A lander could fabricate a geodesic sphere gimbaled about it while in transit to the moon. The sphere could tolerate hard landings and rolling.
NASA: we gave you the flag so we're even for never telling you sht
GO TEAM!
Can someone to a look at it from their backyard using a real telescope
The protocols of the elders of zion are real
💯
Just imagine starship trying to land on another planet.
I said they c-c-c-ouldn't hit it sideways
They c-c-c-c-c-c-couldn't hit it sideways
Oh, just like Sister Ray said.
Its amazing that in this day and age we are shown a few photos of the landing and not a full HD 4k video. That, in itself, says an awful lot!! 👽
It says that the South Pole of the moon doesn’t have broadband. Weird eh?
Here's a thought: At least have uninterrupted video showing multiple angles from takeoff to the point in which the signal is lost. Totally achievable in 2024. @@tubecated_development
Totally achievable, right? @@tubecated_development
How do the pics from decades ago look better than these pics? It's almost like they used a disposable camera! Makes you say hmmmm...
Because the Apollo photos are generally acknowledged to have all been taken in a studio on earth,
Live feeds too.
@@FatherGapon-gw6yo 👍
I think you do the opposite to thinking. You ask no questions at all, just rhetoric and cynicism.
@@tubecated_development 😆
@@FatherGapon-gw6yo Kubrick’s fame still haunts them even now! launch repeaters to the Moon in order to subsequently broadcast the landing of people from the Hollywood pavilion! The more monstrous the lie, the faster they will believe in it (Gebbels)... They are on the right path! The world will soon be surprised! This is business and nothing personal..😂😂😂
The high center of gravity doesn't work too well on the moon either??
Actually makes it worse on the Moon. Your tipping force from sideways motion (inertia) is the same on the Moon but your righting force is your weight acting on your center of gravity which is 1/6 that of Earth. Same tipping force, 1/6th righting force. Low gravity is much much easier to tip over then on Earth if you have any sideways motion which is why the astronauts on the apollo missions kept falling over when they tried to run.
Calling the Odysseus a successful landing is like calling the sinking of the Titanic a successful docking on the sea floor. I hate this NASA government double speak.
Erm 🤓
Awesome! Now much more of the public understands that we never went to the moon in 1969! Keep up those "missions"!
Fantastic don't stop, we need to get to a point where we are launching thousands of missions every day, we need infrastructure built all over our local star system to support deeper explorations.
Dude, without new physics, were stuck in the Solar System arguably forever. This is a fact.
About 4 to 6% of Amerca's GDP went to fund NASA during the 1960's. And it still had learn as it goes failures. For the price, they did pretty good, landed where no one has before and still could send back data.
Wait. Is that George Lucas sitting next to him?
Who filmed the lunar landing ? Aliens 👽