4th Dimension Explained In 60 Seconds!!

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 16 чер 2024
  • #Quantum #Mechanics #4th #Dimension #Collegelife #NicholasGKK #Shorts
    This video covers the basic idea of the fourth dimension in 60 seconds!!
  • Розваги

КОМЕНТАРІ • 3,4 тис.

  • @knight666mare
    @knight666mare 2 роки тому +6694

    Meanwhile in a 4D universe: 5D explained.

    • @Child_Kidnapper69
      @Child_Kidnapper69 2 роки тому +384

      Meanwhile in a 5D universe: 6D explained.

    • @hello7746
      @hello7746 2 роки тому +318

      Meanwhile in a 6D universe: 7D explained.

    • @iloverice3521
      @iloverice3521 2 роки тому +278

      Meanwhile in a 7D universe: 8D explained.

    • @paris-1911
      @paris-1911 2 роки тому +250

      Meanwhile in an 8D universe: 9D explained.

    • @dimashas2268
      @dimashas2268 2 роки тому +236

      Meanwhile in a 9D universe: 10D explained.

  • @daivioi
    @daivioi 2 роки тому +2352

    "Is 4D going to release in the next patch?"

    • @exoticlol
      @exoticlol Рік тому +120

      Nah there's a bug in the code. You gotta wait for Universe 2.0. Better be in the beta program.

    • @whoami7481
      @whoami7481 Рік тому +35

      ​@@exoticlol i want to access 4d beta version please can you send me the link?

    • @nerdy8644
      @nerdy8644 Рік тому +8

      I hope

    • @VedicSanatni
      @VedicSanatni Рік тому +22

      ​@@whoami7481 oops lost the link, better luck next time

    • @nothinghollow
      @nothinghollow Рік тому +12

      @@exoticlol already signed up for the beta, hoping that its released soon

  • @Thirrek
    @Thirrek 2 роки тому +487

    From 2D you can watch all sides of 1D (length) at the same time, from 3D you can watch all sides of 2D (length and height) at the same time. This means you probably can watch all sides of a cube at the same time in 4D.

    • @chickendrovewest9988
      @chickendrovewest9988 Рік тому +35

      And that's why we depict 4d as a kind of outer layer to the cube, as shown at the start of the video

    • @TehWarbird
      @TehWarbird Рік тому +19

      Wait, like a black hole? Its warping light all around it right?

    • @chickendrovewest9988
      @chickendrovewest9988 Рік тому +7

      @@TehWarbird I believe so yes

    • @Kevinpbryant69999
      @Kevinpbryant69999 Рік тому +17

      What if there isn't a fourth dimension and we are just being stupid

    • @Kevinpbryant69999
      @Kevinpbryant69999 Рік тому +5

      @@chickendrovewest9988 those are infinity mirrors of course we can see all sides of a 3d object using mirrors, it's not the same as being in 4d where you can see Al the sides with just your eyes

  • @abiymamo5083
    @abiymamo5083 Рік тому +92

    We can't imagine this because we are trapped in 3D

    • @BiscuitFlash
      @BiscuitFlash 3 місяці тому +1

      We’re in the 4th dimension, which is time

    • @astrouphel
      @astrouphel 3 місяці тому +5

      ​@@BiscuitFlashThat's not the hypothetical fourth spacial dimension, which is what the video is talking about.

    • @BiscuitFlash
      @BiscuitFlash 3 місяці тому +1

      @@astrouphel Oh, well you could say that time *is* a direction, but we only experience it one moment at a time, which is why we can’t perceive it as a spacial direction. Maybe to a 5th dimensional being it would be “spatial”?

    • @ceewhateyecee9701
      @ceewhateyecee9701 3 місяці тому

      And that sucks!

    • @cremephoto
      @cremephoto 2 місяці тому

      Spatial Audio

  • @quakxy_dukx
    @quakxy_dukx 2 роки тому +8781

    Fun fact: the 4d equivalent of a cube is called a tesseract

    • @squidgelad1983
      @squidgelad1983 2 роки тому +1052

      "LiKe ThE tHiNg FrOm ThE mCu OmG"

    • @Wasteman365
      @Wasteman365 2 роки тому +620

      @@squidgelad1983 that's 100% the first thing everyone thought of

    • @alloftheabove8522
      @alloftheabove8522 2 роки тому +129

      Would it be possible to build a set of eyes, that could see every wavelength of light. So therefore, they could see the theoretical connections that 3 dimensions can't. Because we can choose to see infrared, ultraviolet or visible light with tech. But seeing them all at once. What would that be like

    • @zazo5525
      @zazo5525 2 роки тому +204

      @@alloftheabove8522 No offense, but that’s literally the dumbest thing anyones ever said.

    • @ihaveaname15
      @ihaveaname15 2 роки тому +17

      @@zazo5525 "Height be on ta suhm."

  • @chopsticksstudios7341
    @chopsticksstudios7341 2 роки тому +1935

    “Today I’m going to explain the 4th dimension to you in 60 seconds.”
    *Proceeds to explain how we cannot understand the 4th dimension.*

    • @MrBones-be7ry
      @MrBones-be7ry 2 роки тому +1

      He is dumb tho.... The 4th dimension is understood even the 10th dimension is someehat known but I only know how dimensions work to the 5th

    • @Yreev
      @Yreev 2 роки тому +73

      @@MrBones-be7ry The fourth dimension occurs on a (extremely) microscopic level. You can't perceive that. And you are aware that the tenth dimension is a dimension that came from the string theory, right? Not an official dimension?

    • @Dillon6545
      @Dillon6545 2 роки тому +1

      Logic one oh one

    • @Horse_In_A_Suit
      @Horse_In_A_Suit 2 роки тому +5

      @@MrBones-be7ry my guy thinka ge's smart as fuck.

    • @hogridaaaa8710
      @hogridaaaa8710 2 роки тому +5

      Bruh the fourth dimension is time

  • @Detective_Lynne
    @Detective_Lynne Рік тому +45

    Me, using time as 4th dimension:
    *- I have no such weakness.*

    • @TarzanHedgepeth
      @TarzanHedgepeth Рік тому +2

      INDEED

    • @IVeryMuchHateYouTubeHandles
      @IVeryMuchHateYouTubeHandles Рік тому

      Space Time*

    • @sockatoo_
      @sockatoo_ 8 місяців тому +9

      time being the fourth dimension actually makes a little 9sense. this is entirely speculative, of course, but i imagine if the 4th dimension was time, then our universe is moving through the 4th dimension constantly, which is how and why we perceive time moving forward. a being in the 4th dimension could move through time like it's just another direction, which arises some quite fascinating ideas! if we could figure out a way to move things through the 4th dimension some time in the far, _far_ future, we would figure out time travel. and it would be amazing.
      this would ALSO mean that black holes, which can essentially warp time, are just weird empty masses that warp the 4th dimension! so cool. It would explain time dialation across huge cosmic scales as well.
      thank you, random internet person. you're the reason i have the headcanon that the 4th dimension is time. this is genuonely the biggest brain explosion i have ever had and i appreciate you for that (ik this comment is entirely satire but i need to put my theories somewhere lmao)

  • @kataklyzmik9181
    @kataklyzmik9181 2 роки тому +22

    the 4th dimension is all directions discovered in the 3rd, plus the dimension of time, so this means that our universe is in the 4th dimension, as for anything to exist you need the aspect of time, anything without time is an empty void. so any object that you look at in real life is in the 4th dimension.

    • @thesupermarket4074
      @thesupermarket4074 7 місяців тому +3

      They mean 4 spacial dimensions. Time is temporal

    • @darkadmin7970
      @darkadmin7970 6 місяців тому

      If time doesn't exist then everything will simply just freeze,it won't make our reality a void or something

    • @cubebutpro298
      @cubebutpro298 6 місяців тому

      ​@@darkadmin7970actually yes it will,but in spacial dimensions,time isnt a direction

    • @darkadmin7970
      @darkadmin7970 6 місяців тому

      @@cubebutpro298 ah yes now i understand,thanks

    • @cubebutpro298
      @cubebutpro298 6 місяців тому

      @@darkadmin7970 is this sarcastic?

  • @max_garcia
    @max_garcia 2 роки тому +4493

    I always had this thought. You can’t really draw the fourth dimension cause we live in the three dimensional space… so no matter how hard we try to represent it… we just can’t

    • @ablobfish5104
      @ablobfish5104 2 роки тому +484

      like how you cant think of new colours

    • @waleedsa3eed
      @waleedsa3eed 2 роки тому +356

      @@ablobfish5104 and the fact that there are colors we can't see or experience but horses can

    • @__someone8938
      @__someone8938 2 роки тому +58

      Perhaps we can train AI to do so?

    • @baka9067
      @baka9067 2 роки тому +156

      @@__someone8938 well yes because , quantum mechanics or something i Guess 🗿 🦧 me monke dumb

    • @adrian16281
      @adrian16281 2 роки тому +65

      Some people consider time as the 4th dimension, which is interesting. However, time doesn't have a direction (as far as we know), it just exists

  • @NorCa60
    @NorCa60 2 роки тому +3092

    bro is tryna teach me about 4D in a 3d world on 2D screen while i have a 1D Brain

  • @sonicxxx100
    @sonicxxx100 Рік тому +5

    Whats crazy is that Mathematically, this goes all the way up to infinity

  • @cultofhampter
    @cultofhampter 2 роки тому +30

    4D guy: *look at what they need to mimic a fraction of our power*

    • @augustosperkadesouzaherman6982
      @augustosperkadesouzaherman6982 Рік тому

      We cannot cause it's not a physical thing, the 4th dimension its time.

    • @cultofhampter
      @cultofhampter Рік тому +2

      @@augustosperkadesouzaherman6982 it's a joke....

    • @blossomicblossom7
      @blossomicblossom7 2 дні тому

      ​@@cultofhampteryo i might be 4th dimension guy, because i talked to u 1 year later but in my pov its present😱😱

  • @overz00m
    @overz00m 2 роки тому +507

    I like how when you talk it's like 1.2x faster

    • @Cr3reeper
      @Cr3reeper Рік тому +5

      and u still understand it

    • @RubyPiec
      @RubyPiec Рік тому +8

      because it is

    • @BoZl_
      @BoZl_ Рік тому +6

      2x!

    • @Cr3reeper
      @Cr3reeper Рік тому +4

      @@BoZl_ 2 Times is wayy faster than you think, you cant understand it

    • @BoZl_
      @BoZl_ Рік тому

      @@Cr3reeper 4x

  • @cowplatter5320
    @cowplatter5320 2 роки тому +286

    That would be a great heckle.
    “Your feeble mind can’t comprehend the notion of a 4th dimensional object because we exist on a 3rd dimensional plane!”

    • @j.t.a588
      @j.t.a588 2 роки тому +3

      Or maybe we are already in the 4th dimension, Our eyes are not capable of seeing it.

    • @your_-_mom
      @your_-_mom 2 роки тому

      @@GabrielsEpicLifeofGoals prove it

    • @legate7158
      @legate7158 2 роки тому

      exept the fact that we have comprehended the notion of a 3rd and 2nd dimension

    • @nugo344
      @nugo344 2 роки тому

      @@your_-_mom prove that he wrong

    • @nugo344
      @nugo344 2 роки тому

      @@j.t.a588 nope, not how it works

  • @tomsterbg8130
    @tomsterbg8130 2 роки тому +13

    The 4th dimension is multiple 3D worlds. Moving through the 4th dimension is like changing books and moving in the 3rd dimension is like changing pages.

  • @kidnamedsolid3547
    @kidnamedsolid3547 Рік тому +565

    You’re trying to explain 4D objects, by showing me a 3d diagram, on a 2d screen to my 1D brain
    Edit: I may have copied this comment but you people lecturing me about me copying a comment just means your jealous of my likes, you might not want to believe it but it’s true. If it were you who copied a comment and got a bunch of likes, you wouldn’t feel guilty

    • @tammid8423
      @tammid8423 Рік тому +48

      Copied? I've seen this comment thousands of times already

    • @DeenBoi
      @DeenBoi Рік тому +28

      @@tammid8423 even my old ass account in like 2018 has made this exact comment

    • @thefutureismeaninglessthep7364
      @thefutureismeaninglessthep7364 Рік тому +6

      Unoriginal

    • @memoochoaprime
      @memoochoaprime Рік тому +6

      All dimensions less than 3d can easily be explained in a 3d lol

    • @iCxrln
      @iCxrln Рік тому +6

      1d brain lmaooo🤣

  • @designd9956
    @designd9956 2 роки тому +405

    Its like trying to draw a 2 dimensional square in the 1st dimension. Simply impossible.

    • @beaconblaster33
      @beaconblaster33 2 роки тому +7

      shading and layering
      POV: you're living in 2d

    • @arkanon8661
      @arkanon8661 2 роки тому +6

      He drew a cube in 2d by projecting it, you can just do the same for 4d

    • @designd9956
      @designd9956 2 роки тому +28

      @@arkanon8661 I would say its a accurate representation, but we cannot actually truly visualize it. On paper, a square are 4 lines 90 degrees relative to each other. If your drawing a cube, its lines are still 90 degrees relative to each other. But lets say you have a xyz space coordinate in a virtual workspace, so you can see each xyz line is 90 degrees relative to each other (cus on paper x or z would not be 90 degrees from the other coordinates), how would you draw the 4th coordinate while it being 90 degrees relative to the other coordinates, while it not sharing a same direction as the other coordinates? simply impossible. So yes and no, we can maybe visualize it but we can't imagine something our brain has never been exposed to.

    • @designd9956
      @designd9956 2 роки тому

      @@arkanon8661 or the what the video says

    • @arkanon8661
      @arkanon8661 2 роки тому

      @@designd9956 in a 2d screen/piece of paper notice how the lines get distorted, the z axis is no longer at 90 degrees. The same thing happens if you try to draw the 4th dimension, just that you have to project it into 3D then 2d instead of just to 2d

  • @Manwhoassociateshimselfwithbat
    @Manwhoassociateshimselfwithbat 2 роки тому +653

    Me forcing my brain to make up new colors, dimensions of space, and will to live 🤯

  • @Red_Sky_postNuke
    @Red_Sky_postNuke Рік тому +4

    Well, you can take the cube and put it in the time. Like
    Past: a big one,
    Present: normal size,
    Future: small one.
    Then you put their middles in 1 point and connect the dots. It's hard to move the structure, but it's a bit logically.

  • @TrulyMorningstar
    @TrulyMorningstar 2 роки тому +6

    I’d like to think it’s pretty much like no matter where or how you look at the object you perceive every part of it at once.

    • @sadibarry
      @sadibarry 3 місяці тому

      I feel like this true

  • @billthegreek
    @billthegreek 2 роки тому +519

    this is what I want to see on my UA-cam shorts, thanks man

    • @Ranjana_gupta1709
      @Ranjana_gupta1709 2 роки тому +18

      Yeah same im happy that I haven't encountered those "Respect🤬🥶😯" Shorts

    • @billthegreek
      @billthegreek 2 роки тому +7

      @@Ranjana_gupta1709 that's actually true.. I've encountered a lot and they're annoying, those people probably dont know the definition of "respect"

    • @Jenik21216
      @Jenik21216 2 роки тому +1

      You wanna by happy???
      Yes. Smile.
      No. Subscribe.

    • @MrBones-be7ry
      @MrBones-be7ry 2 роки тому

      Why do u want to see dumb bullshit? He doesnt know what the 4th dimension is he didn't even learn about it

    • @harumsam9946
      @harumsam9946 2 роки тому

      Hey your pfp is like my frind in albion

  • @elishawomack
    @elishawomack 2 роки тому +156

    Someone finally explained this correctly. Thank you so much I love you.

    • @kingmiller1982
      @kingmiller1982 Рік тому +8

      Actually he didn't explain anything.

    • @elishawomack
      @elishawomack Рік тому +8

      @@kingmiller1982 eh, at least he was accurate with talking about limitations

    • @seandawkins1782
      @seandawkins1782 Рік тому +4

      Incorrect. Time, in our spaceTIME, is the fourth dimension. We have trouble appreciating it as such because we're 'in time' (as opposed to outside of it or apart from it some other way).
      There are 4 known dimensions: x, y, z, and t (for, you guessed it: time).

    • @elishawomack
      @elishawomack Рік тому +2

      @@seandawkins1782 if we exist inside of the dimension of time we won't be able to fully understand it or define it ever since it's limiting our perception of what it is. We're like a fly cought under a bowl trying to understand what the outside structure and design of the bowl is. We'll never know unless we get out of it.

    • @seandawkins1782
      @seandawkins1782 Рік тому +3

      @@elishawomack I don't know how old you are, but if you've ever played and won a game of Solitaire on a Windows computer, there was a *time* when the cards would bounce out from the deck one by one. The thing is, the animation displayed the single card's entire path from start to finish, from the beginning to the end. We then are shown, all at once, entirety of that single card's motion.
      Better than that: the movie Interstellar. The tesseract scene is the closet thing we have to understanding time as the fourth dimension it is. Cooper was able to see his daughter's past and more recent past...because he was quite literally outside of that time looking in. No?

  • @jadinkllz12
    @jadinkllz12 Рік тому +3

    I’ve drawn 3D representations of what a 6D object would look like

    • @YourFavoriteChristian.
      @YourFavoriteChristian. 5 місяців тому +2

      But we see in 2D??? we cannot see in a higher plane than double of the one we can see. Example: we live in 3D. We see in 2D. We cannot see 5D. We COULD see 4D in the future. We can see 3D with 3D glasses (just needs improvement ngl). Get it?

  • @deborahsheets2604
    @deborahsheets2604 3 місяці тому

    I’ve been going crazy trying to understand 4d but thank you for making me feel better in saying that we can’t truly imagine it.

  • @gabe8168
    @gabe8168 2 роки тому +132

    Technically you can make a 4d object using a computer and code. It'll "exist" inside the computer as an array with four dimensions. You just won't be able to see the entire object because it's not something we can visualize. Although you would be able to see 3d sections of it. Kind of like how you can see 2d sections of a cube if you cut it up into thin slices

    • @KeyboardMoment
      @KeyboardMoment 2 роки тому +5

      @Thegoldmokey exactly

    • @GEOPOLITICS47
      @GEOPOLITICS47 Рік тому

      We need vr 4d

    • @galactorsus_i.n.c
      @galactorsus_i.n.c Рік тому

      I'm planning on making that into a game

    • @ryanonymous510
      @ryanonymous510 Рік тому +1

      The 4th dimension is Time

    • @Chris-nm9uj
      @Chris-nm9uj Рік тому

      There's a YT video of 4D Toys that visualizes different objects: ua-cam.com/video/0t4aKJuKP0Q/v-deo.html

  • @rickandrygel913
    @rickandrygel913 2 роки тому +71

    1D: line
    2D: 90° out from a line (plane)
    3D: 90° out from a plane (space)
    4D: 90° out from space (???) profit

    • @imperioushearth5837
      @imperioushearth5837 2 роки тому +3

      Eh close 4th dimension Is actually time (by actually i mean theories and all that)

    • @hey_how_are_ya
      @hey_how_are_ya 2 роки тому +2

      @@imperioushearth5837 and the fifth involves gravity with time.

    • @MrBones-be7ry
      @MrBones-be7ry 2 роки тому

      There are 11 dimensions we know of from 0 to 10

    • @MrBones-be7ry
      @MrBones-be7ry 2 роки тому

      @@hey_how_are_ya no? Fifth is jumping between different timelines and fourth is going back and forth in Time

    • @hey_how_are_ya
      @hey_how_are_ya 2 роки тому +6

      @@MrBones-be7ry “The fifth dimension is a micro-dimension which is accepted in physics and mathematics. It's here to have a nice and seamless tie between gravity and electromagnetism, or the main fundamental forces, which seem unrelated in the regular four-dimensional spacetime.” Have you watched interstellar?

  • @GB-sr9kv
    @GB-sr9kv Рік тому +2

    the problem with 4d is that, we don’t know which way to we’re supposed to go, while we can make 4d with two cubes, we just don’t know how to do it

    • @luis-sophus-8227
      @luis-sophus-8227 Рік тому +1

      I think you got the wrong idea. 4D is an expansion of 3D, there's no concrete direction.

  • @ayaanrashedin3315
    @ayaanrashedin3315 Рік тому +4

    If the AC Repair school would just tell us the direction they keep secret we’d be able to see the 4th dimension

  • @darkoverspy2968
    @darkoverspy2968 2 роки тому +26

    Something that really helped me is looking at the net of a tesseract. The net of a cube is a way to represent it in 2 dimensions, so the net of a tesseract is a way to represent it in 3 dimensions.

    • @hunterjoy1871
      @hunterjoy1871 2 роки тому

      Its pretty difficult to explain 4d in a 2d environment, but in a 3d environment where we can "fly around inside" its pretty easy to explain... imagine a 3d space where f(x,y,z) now we are going to add another variable to make it a 4d space. We will call it a temperature map T(x,y,z,t) where x,y,z all mean the same thing and t is a temperature at a certain point. t will change nomatter any of the other variables. Thats the 4th dimension explained in a simple way.

    • @jasonkunitz5237
      @jasonkunitz5237 2 роки тому

      All this shit just hurts my brain

  • @fpstopros
    @fpstopros 2 роки тому +15

    You cant go to 4th dimension
    *Meanwhile my local cinema: *NEW!! 4D MOVIE!!!!*

    • @erezsolomon3838
      @erezsolomon3838 Рік тому +1

      And the viewers cannot perceive that it's a scam!

  • @zigalpha9741
    @zigalpha9741 Рік тому +1

    Finally a video that doesn't try and convince me that higher dimensions are simply derived by stacking an infinite number of a lower dimension..

  • @Erpakarod911
    @Erpakarod911 3 місяці тому +1

    We wouldn't probably guess how 4d looked like but my guess is that they have another direction that we can't see

  • @ixedme1729
    @ixedme1729 2 роки тому +13

    Can’t wait for the 4d update

  • @reapercreeper6097
    @reapercreeper6097 2 роки тому +6

    If we can represent 3D on a 2D paper, there must be a way to represent 4D in 3D space

    • @shreekarreddy7615
      @shreekarreddy7615 2 роки тому +1

      tesseract experiments on YT

    • @dmytrotsvyntarnyi799
      @dmytrotsvyntarnyi799 2 роки тому +6

      We can represent 3D on 2D only because we know how 3D works, so, instead of seeing this 🧊 as a hexagon, which it actually is, our minds represent it as a cube

    • @Jpx0999
      @Jpx0999 Рік тому

      Yeah
      Except even tough to a 2d being on the paper
      It would look like a 3d object to them
      Just a very weird 2d one
      De can only perceuve it as "3d" because we already knew What 3D looked like beforehand
      A 4d object created in a 3d enviroment wount look like a 4d object But as a VERY weird 3d one

    • @Llama_Dhali_G
      @Llama_Dhali_G Рік тому

      Put 36 cubes in equal separation around the 37th cube then connect ALL corners, there is your 4th . .

    • @sadibarry
      @sadibarry 3 місяці тому

      @@dmytrotsvyntarnyi799exactly. We live in a 3d world where we can only see 3 dimensions at once length, width & height. We can’t look behind or thru an object. We just know there is another side.
      I think in the 4th dimension you can see the other side. You see all four sides of a cube…from another angle/viewpoint. Most assume that angle is through time past, present, and future. But as the flatlanders couldn’t not wrap their minds around height or depth. That someone could look above and see everything. We can’t imagine how someone could look through or in a way we’ve never known…

  • @objectivecompleted-9474
    @objectivecompleted-9474 4 місяці тому +4

    1D: lines
    2D: sides and vertices (corners)
    3D: length and width and height
    4D: time
    5D: changes and manifestations
    6D: elliptical spaces and hyperbolic spaces
    7D: vector space

    • @dhruv-880
      @dhruv-880 2 місяці тому

      Wrong 4d is not time 💀 we have no idea yet what is 4d or higher

  • @YourAverageMango
    @YourAverageMango Рік тому +1

    If you can’t understand: each time the shapes duplicate, we look at them from a new dimension, so he straight line and the line above show the 2nd dimension cause up and down are the two dimensions in the square, similarly we need the cubes to align in a 4D angle in order to connect them to their end points and make a 4D shape, but we can’t make a 4D area cause we are in the 3rd dimension.

  • @skadforlife7857
    @skadforlife7857 2 роки тому +47

    Damn that’s literally the best way of explaining it ever. I instantly got it, although I’ve always kind of figured this was the case. Thanks!

    • @santhoshs-vr3un
      @santhoshs-vr3un 2 роки тому +4

      In first dimension we can jump from one point to another point on the same line..
      In second dimension we can jump from one line to another line on the same plane
      In third dimension we can jump from one plane to another plane in the same space..
      In fourth dimension we can jump from one space to another space...,

    • @KokeBeast23
      @KokeBeast23 2 роки тому +1

      @@santhoshs-vr3un and that’s where time comes in

    • @TWplayer
      @TWplayer Рік тому +1

      @@santhoshs-vr3un in first dimension theres an apple in front of you, but we cant see it
      In second dimension theres an apple inside a box, but we cant see it
      In third dimension theres an apple inside a closed box, but we cant see it
      In fourth dimension theres an apple (???), But we cant see it

  • @vsl5455
    @vsl5455 2 роки тому +89

    You can simply have the cubes appear one after the other, inbetween only having the end points, which will give you the illustration you are looking for with time as the 4th direction.

    • @Thymed
      @Thymed 2 роки тому +6

      I like to think about two things. You in the third dimension looking at a two dimensional object (imagine it as a big piece of paper). You could see everything on two dimensional piece of paper if nothing is blocking you in the third dimension. You can easily solve a 2d maze And look around boundaries that a 2d creature would face. If you stabbed a 2d creature with a pencil, the 2d creature would see part of the pencil appear out of thin air and then get stabbed by it. If a 4d creature stabbed you, part of the 4d object would appear out of thin air and could easily just stab you in the heart without any contact to your skin

    • @Thymed
      @Thymed 2 роки тому +6

      Also how a 4d dimension would be infinitely stacked 3rd dimensions on top of another in a direction we can’t perceive

    • @Thymed
      @Thymed 2 роки тому +5

      Time is also not the fourth dimension. Why would the first three dimensions be spacial and then the fourth one time? Also then the fourth dimension exists in the third, second, and first dimension. The third dimension doesn’t exist in the second dimension but it does (kinda) in the fourth dimension. Unless you imagine time as the 0th dimension as it exists in all of the dimension above it, but at that point why label it as a dimension as it still acts differently than other dimensions as a third dimension without time wouldn’t be the second dimension

    • @pearrot
      @pearrot 2 роки тому +6

      Large misconception people seem to be getting from this. There are two different types of dimensions in physics, spatial and geometrical. Spatial refers to time and energy and the overall body we are describing, such as universes and possibilities. Geometrical refers to the actual shape itself, where you have lines, squares, and cubes for whatnot. They are not the same, and this video talks about geometrical dimensions not spatial. Also the existence of the fourth dimension isn’t proven, and by the very laws of physics as we know of them, can’t be proven as we cannot interact with the 4th dimension (geometrical one) since you can’t interact with things in a dimension above you.

    • @oriongabriel6966
      @oriongabriel6966 2 роки тому

      I think its about the fourth space dimension, not time.

  • @thefatcat2790
    @thefatcat2790 Рік тому +1

    I find it easiest to kind of understand dimensions above 3d as kind of arrays, so instead of asking myself how does something look like, I try to fix what is in a specified coordinate, extending the regular xyz position, with the 4th dimension coordinate for example setting what exactly is there. Or maybe as a system of numbering rooms in a warehouse: main corridor x: enter door 5; branching corridor y: door 4; branching corridor z: door 19; etc. etc.; final branching corridor...: door 7 -> room/what's at position/...

  • @DeepakGautamX
    @DeepakGautamX 6 місяців тому +1

    Exactly my thought. That is why 4d cube thing not actually 4d.

  • @semvanderkraan2597
    @semvanderkraan2597 2 роки тому +15

    I always think of it as time, every single moment in time is another very small point of the shape, but because we experience time we can’t see all points at once, only if you live outside of time you can see in the fourth dimension

    • @sharky977
      @sharky977 2 роки тому

      that’s what hg wells book the time machine was about. like time is a dimension, our consciousness just moves along it. also another analogy i heard was that time was like a string and a flame is moving along the string. the past is burnt out buy the future is still malleable

    • @stefanbrod9140
      @stefanbrod9140 2 роки тому

      Are you guys high right now?😶‍🌫️

  • @alexanderzafox634
    @alexanderzafox634 2 роки тому +5

    When I see the 4th representation I imagine it as if the cub is moving through time and the lines connecting the two cubes is time connecting them

    • @jeffthevomitguy1178
      @jeffthevomitguy1178 2 роки тому

      That's good but wouldn't that mean time was the 4th dimensional direction?.

    • @alexanderzafox634
      @alexanderzafox634 2 роки тому

      @@jeffthevomitguy1178 ya thats pretty much what i was trying to say haha

    • @Jpx0999
      @Jpx0999 Рік тому

      @@jeffthevomitguy1178 majority of people seems to agree soo

  • @sshheessee4468
    @sshheessee4468 Рік тому +1

    i love learning about the limitations of the human body

  • @natsudragneelthefiredragon
    @natsudragneelthefiredragon 2 роки тому +1

    I understood that we needed another direction, but not wtf that cube was, thanks for your explanation, it'll be helpful for a story idea I have....

  • @ipurpleukpopclips
    @ipurpleukpopclips 2 роки тому +5

    When watching movies I just thought 4D would be 3D but you can also feel the movie

  • @akruijff
    @akruijff 2 роки тому +4

    The fourth direction is time.

    • @zatupich
      @zatupich 6 місяців тому

      ​@@Yotuber36what the hell?

  • @pradyumn2453
    @pradyumn2453 9 місяців тому +1

    If we don't have the knowledge we believe everything

  • @Ziggyzaggy300
    @Ziggyzaggy300 Рік тому +1

    I cant wait until we figure this out

  • @capncook2006
    @capncook2006 2 роки тому +41

    I always thought the 4th dimension was time. You take a 3d object and it goes in the direction of time.

    • @jsonr
      @jsonr 2 роки тому +26

      that's the 4th dimension of spacetime. that isn't a spatial dimension.

    • @capncook2006
      @capncook2006 2 роки тому +16

      @@jsonr no bitches + ratio + 4d

    • @danielarnold9042
      @danielarnold9042 2 роки тому +14

      @@capncook2006 get a life, they were just responding to you

    • @BigSadCrouton
      @BigSadCrouton 2 роки тому

      @@danielarnold9042 it was a joke

    • @evernarten42
      @evernarten42 2 роки тому +10

      @@BigSadCrouton unfortunately not funny to most of us

  • @sebastianrubin7476
    @sebastianrubin7476 2 роки тому +5

    "we can't draw a fourth-dimensional object on a two-dimensional plane", he says, immediately after drawing a three-dimensional object on a two-dimensional plane.
    I'm just going to sit here, raising one eyebrow while sipping my tea out of a Klein bottle, like the Great Old One I am.

    • @TarzanHedgepeth
      @TarzanHedgepeth Рік тому +2

      I’m with YOU. And what we visualize has more dimension than what we see, and what we see has more dimension than that piece of paper…

    • @PuffyRhys
      @PuffyRhys Рік тому

      The three-dimensional drawing is still two-dimensional

    • @TarzanHedgepeth
      @TarzanHedgepeth Рік тому

      @@PuffyRhys What you see with your eyes is “2-dimensional”. They are next to each other - they’re not wrapping around objects. That’s why you will see a square when looking at a cube dead on - and you have to turn the cube to see that it is. Without shadows, you wouldn’t see a sphere.
      So, it’s not so much that the object on paper is 2-dimensional - if you had an eye beside the paper and it could see microscopically, you’d see a couple of lines of atoms revealing the depth of the pencil on the paper. It would be popping off the paper… and then if your brain was wired to mesh those images together to create a realistic, holistic image, you’d be seeing 3-D.

    • @sockatoo_
      @sockatoo_ 8 місяців тому

      i'm obsessed with klein bottles thank you for mentioning them

  • @zohraimam
    @zohraimam 4 місяці тому

    First time I understand the concept of domination 🎉

  • @WrinkledPaper674
    @WrinkledPaper674 6 місяців тому +1

    1D:Length
    2D:Width
    3D:Depth

  • @rahulshrivastava3041
    @rahulshrivastava3041 2 роки тому +8

    Nice explanatn

  • @maxtherobloxian5573
    @maxtherobloxian5573 2 роки тому +10

    Person: discovers 4 dimension
    That one dude: ok discover 5 dimension

  • @LisaandtheRatRangers
    @LisaandtheRatRangers 8 місяців тому

    This is so awesome! Brilliant

  • @NunotherthanCrackerzhimself
    @NunotherthanCrackerzhimself 3 місяці тому +1

    As 3d creatures with 2d vision I think in order for us to really understand what 4d looks like, we have to have at least 3d vision

  • @SloppyPuppy
    @SloppyPuppy 2 роки тому +4

    But you did draw the 4th dimension. 2D projection of a 4D hyper-cube.
    Just like how you didnt define a new direction for the 3rd dimension but drew a 2D projection of it. Or rather a cross section that displays 3 sides.
    Likewise if you position the hypercube the right way youll have 9 sides visible at once using your 2d capable eyeballs.

    • @theoceanic4664
      @theoceanic4664 2 роки тому +1

      Simply put it our eyes and minds can see or imagine 4d

  • @pearrot
    @pearrot 2 роки тому +3

    Large misconception people seem to be getting from this. There are two different types of dimensions in physics, spatial and geometrical. Spatial refers to time and energy and the overall body we are describing, such as universes and possibilities. Geometrical refers to the actual shape itself, where you have lines, squares, and cubes for whatnot. They are not the same, and this video talks about geometrical dimensions not spatial. Also the existence of the fourth dimension isn’t proven, and by the very laws of physics as we know of them, can’t be proven as we cannot interact with the 4th dimension (geometrical one) since you can’t interact with things in a dimension above you.

  • @MreenGreenn
    @MreenGreenn Рік тому

    This is very realistic definition of 4th dimension. I'm happy with it being mysteries and desperately wanting to know at the same time.

  • @Bushwig
    @Bushwig 11 місяців тому

    Your turbo good at explaining

  • @xTriton_
    @xTriton_ 2 роки тому +3

    I found this all by myself as a 13 year old, I basically went,
    "Huh, if stacking 2 squares gives me a cube, which is of a dimension higher than the squares, then shouldn't I get a 4th Dimensional object by stacking 2 cubes?"
    Which is quite some thinking for a child and my concepts weren't *entirely* wrong.

    • @Jpx0999
      @Jpx0999 Рік тому

      This man os going to ascend do the higher Dimension when he unlock the secrets of 4D

  • @poketoscoparentesesloparen7648
    @poketoscoparentesesloparen7648 2 роки тому +103

    Well when you drew the cube you can’t define another direction that is perpendicular to the others too. You are drawing on a 2d paper…

    • @restrictednuggies
      @restrictednuggies 2 роки тому +4

      Just because he’s drawing on paper doesn’t mean anything he said is wrong. Stop trying to act smart

    • @thatnike2604
      @thatnike2604 2 роки тому +8

      @@restrictednuggies of course he's not wrong. But he didn't mention that the third dimension in the diagram is also not a new direction because it's on a 2D screen.
      So on a 2D surface only two dimensions can be drawn.
      So the fourth dimension is just as valid as the third dimension in a drawing
      I think that's what op meant

    • @restrictednuggies
      @restrictednuggies 2 роки тому

      @@thatnike2604 Well if it is what he meant, it could’ve been worded better

    • @createyourownfuture5410
      @createyourownfuture5410 2 роки тому

      @@thatnike2604 but we can represent the 3rd dimension in the real world, we can't do the same for 4 dimensions.

    • @thatnike2604
      @thatnike2604 2 роки тому

      @@createyourownfuture5410 true, because our Universe as far as we know has only 3 dimensions (not including time). But mathematically, 4 and above (up to 11, I think) are also acceptable. We just can't comprehend beyond 3D

  • @mrrobot838
    @mrrobot838 Рік тому +1

    Fun fact about dimensions: when we look at a 2D image, we can see people, items, or buildings in the image. But some people can’t see other people in the image. As because we are a 3D creature looking at a 2D world. But if we say that a 4D being is looking at our 3D world, the 4D being will be able to see the length, depth, and height of objects like a wall.

  • @Nigel-shorts
    @Nigel-shorts Рік тому

    man bro I learned more in this video then school

  • @Breadslaughter
    @Breadslaughter 2 роки тому +28

    The second he said fourth dimension my brain just said “IS MY OwN MAnSIon”

  • @TheGoofyMoth
    @TheGoofyMoth 2 роки тому +10

    0-D: A concept of shape (non-existing)
    1-D: One axis (x,y,z)
    2-D: Two axis in different directions (x,y, or other axis combined)
    3-D: Three axis in all directions (all of x,y,z)
    4-D: Overlapping 0,1,2,3 dimensions in all axis (x,y,z)

    • @SloppyPuppy
      @SloppyPuppy 2 роки тому

      Thats some Tri-dimensional prejudice right there. Oh and also 4-D makes no sense. (the 0th dimension is just a geometrical point, if you really wanna imagine any higher dimension geometrically simply imagine the previouse dimension as a dot and the connect the two "dots".

    • @Neoln
      @Neoln 2 роки тому

      The 4th dimension would be like w,x,y,x

    • @TheGoofyMoth
      @TheGoofyMoth 2 роки тому

      @@Neoln except if it is any fewer than x,y,z it would be a golfball

    • @Neoln
      @Neoln 2 роки тому

      @@TheGoofyMoth z is the last letter, so w it is

    • @TheGoofyMoth
      @TheGoofyMoth 2 роки тому

      True

  • @carterenglish1230
    @carterenglish1230 2 роки тому

    Starting to make sense… thanks!

  • @AdityaKumar-gv4dj
    @AdityaKumar-gv4dj Рік тому +1

    This is just the limit of world with dimension tending to infinity

  • @michaeloyesiku
    @michaeloyesiku Рік тому +9

    The fourth dimension exists when time gives the new direction

    • @Herb.
      @Herb. 11 місяців тому +1

      Time already exists in dimensions 1-3 so it is not the 4th dimension, time is a dimension that always exists in any spacial dimension 🤝

  • @MaxEng1492
    @MaxEng1492 2 роки тому +16

    Is time not a “dimension” that hosts an infinite amount of 3 dimensional worlds?

    • @MothNeo
      @MothNeo 2 роки тому +2

      time is not a spatial dimension

    • @rubenvegas7926
      @rubenvegas7926 2 роки тому +5

      @@MothNeo Time is a 4th dimension. We move through time just as we do like we move in space. The theory of general relativity kinda explains this

    • @MaxEng1492
      @MaxEng1492 2 роки тому +2

      @@MothNeo “spatial” dimensions imply 3 dimensions. So i don’t really know you mean. Are you trying to say that there is a direction not covered by the 3 dimensions we have? Why can’t that be time? If we move forward or back in the timeline, we can effectively teleport because the universe moves

    • @blobfish1649
      @blobfish1649 2 роки тому +3

      @@MaxEng1492 Time can exist in 2 dimensions too. Time is just when a dimension progresses. The 4th dimension would be an infinite amount of 3 dimensions stacked on top of each other which is not really possible to picture. I see what you are trying to say tho

    • @minibon3028
      @minibon3028 2 роки тому

      I think that Time being a dimension is just a myth

  • @InsightSplash1
    @InsightSplash1 9 днів тому

    basically a tesseract isn't a 4D object but it's the closet representation we could get

  • @idk-fj7wb
    @idk-fj7wb 2 роки тому

    Man the 4D update is going to be awesome

  • @cosmq
    @cosmq 2 роки тому +5

    We invented 2d, 3d, 1d and all of these, so we can invent the 4th dimension right?
    Well... if we get a sphere and move it up a 2d plane there will be a point that expands in a circle that gets bigger until the we reach the middle of the sphere, then it will shrink till its a point, and dissapear. So if we get a 4d sphere thru a 3d plane it will be a point that expands in a sphere that grows until we reach the middle and then it shrinks.
    In both cases the objects moved thru time and space, so 4d is 3d but comlex? A 4d cube is a cube that has 3d cubes as sides not sqares

    • @otgsas
      @otgsas 2 роки тому +2

      We didnt invent dimensions, we live in the 3d world with x,y and z planes. Thats why we cannot do anything about 4d. Imagine a 2d object looking at a 3d object, as it cannot comprehend the z plane, the 3d object is seen as a 2d object. Similarly, if we ever can imagine a fourth plane, which is highly theoretical, we would still see it as a 3d object

    • @sinpar1226
      @sinpar1226 2 роки тому +1

      Who told you we invented 3 spaces lmao that's just how the world works we just took said spaces and made stuff with them

  • @asmaaabbas9661
    @asmaaabbas9661 2 роки тому

    Wow thank you for the information

  • @JevwODviOThN
    @JevwODviOThN Місяць тому

    can't wait for the update when they gonna add 4D

  • @dogeball2628
    @dogeball2628 Рік тому

    you could use time as your fourth dimension instead, moving along time you see new parts of it but you've all already seen that

  • @Athropod101
    @Athropod101 Рік тому

    Rinnman’s Plane is the best representation we have of a 4d space. You have to gradient it in order for it to be comprehensible, though.

  • @samuelparvin9334
    @samuelparvin9334 6 місяців тому +1

    If I were to try and imagine a new direction I would view it as an object expanding. There I solved 4d

  • @dhsora95
    @dhsora95 2 роки тому

    This 3d representation of a cube is effectively what the shadow of a 4th dimensional shape would look like

  • @Karma-fs1dk
    @Karma-fs1dk Рік тому

    My best guess for what a 4th dimension would be like an axis based on time. It'd be difficult to visualise because we can't go back or forth in time, but we could theoritically see it with a camera. But idk

  • @xKarenWalkerx
    @xKarenWalkerx 2 місяці тому +1

    I always thought the experience of the universe to be the fourth dimension. As in physicality + time = 4D. We can technically conceive of it; just not all at once.

  • @zohraimam
    @zohraimam 4 місяці тому

    Good Job 👏👍

  • @killerkitten7
    @killerkitten7 2 роки тому

    this man is an genius

  • @FyTrax
    @FyTrax Рік тому

    The Thing is that we live in the 3rd Dimension and can unverstand how the 2rd and 1st Dimensions work could mean that a beeing in any Dimension can understand all the dimensions under them

  • @therealmagmalord3479
    @therealmagmalord3479 5 місяців тому

    If you have a sphere and you put 4 equidistant lines that extend to infinity, you can make a 4d graph.

  • @lauroneto3360
    @lauroneto3360 2 місяці тому

    Another way to understand it is by cross sectioning a dimension so you can view its dimension below. The cross section of a 3d object is a 2d plain.the cross section of a plain is a 1d line. The cross section of a line is a 0d point.
    The cross section of a 4d "thing" is a 3d object.
    In my mind, time running on a object is the 4d dimension, and if you cross section it, which means picking a fraction of this object existence, is its third dimension. So we actually live in a 4th dimension since time is passing by.

  • @tinyleafdr
    @tinyleafdr Рік тому +1

    Oh!! we kept going in lines and never went around so maybe that’s the thing

  • @Yuri_editz11
    @Yuri_editz11 6 місяців тому +1

    But Einstein said that basically 4th dimension is time ⏰

  • @shakedwald
    @shakedwald Рік тому +1

    Now let’s go to the 26d

  • @Tor469
    @Tor469 Рік тому

    Make a smaller square in a larger one, connect the endpoints

  • @jellykeksz1528
    @jellykeksz1528 Рік тому

    this makes sence
    I asked this from my math teacher and she said it existed but didnt explain it
    Thank You

  • @Razorrr_
    @Razorrr_ Рік тому

    i had a headache trying to process that 4th dimension drawing

  • @crystaluwu1012
    @crystaluwu1012 Рік тому

    The fourth dimension is a concept and its called time, a best example of this is in the movie Interstellar, when the main protag found themselves inside a black hole and woke up in a tesseract, a higher plain of existance, the fourth dimension on which time itself is a physical touchable dimension, everytime he goes backward in direction of the tesseract, he goes back in time, everytime he moves forward, he goes forward in time.

  • @Mr.Maguire221b
    @Mr.Maguire221b 4 місяці тому +1

    The fourth dimension is time.
    I might be wrong, but move those cubes around and I think you've got it.

    • @Z55.-
      @Z55.- Місяць тому

      its not time, were talking about directions

    • @InsightSplash1
      @InsightSplash1 9 днів тому

      ​​@@Z55.- 4thdimension is widely considered to be time

  • @MCFedev
    @MCFedev 2 роки тому +1

    4D is time, so then you have 2 cubes in 2 different times. So the purple line is maybe time?

  • @hankenthusiast6187
    @hankenthusiast6187 2 роки тому

    I hate how everyone acts like they know what the 4th dimension is by using logic from the 2nd and 3rd dimension. I'm glad you just straight up said "it can't be done because our minds won't understand it"

  • @NeelankanSarkar
    @NeelankanSarkar Місяць тому

    In 4d we can see time which means we can see another reality in the same place in another timeline

  • @bismillahkazimi7975
    @bismillahkazimi7975 Рік тому

    An amazing exploration

  • @irollerblade13
    @irollerblade13 3 місяці тому

    How did it just take me until this video to realize what dimension really means...

  • @Luke10.25-gospelJesustaught
    @Luke10.25-gospelJesustaught 8 місяців тому

    You can still view 4d in 3d by keeping one of the vectors at 0°0° (both boints appearing as a single point)