a) Dallas doctors are plainly seen at their first press conference speculating wildly about the wounds, unable to conjecture about numbers, trajectories, etc. b) Those doctors are also seen on NOVA in 1988 having no particular problem with the autopsy photos.
It was a turning point because we no longer really have a country. The agencies do but we don't. An old line from a movie called Thunder Heart; You don't have freedom. You have the illusion of freedom.
@@aaronz7056 I'm jus' sayin' Don't Stop from lookin' further than LBJ & Hoover, especially since the CIA was pissed after the JFK/ Khruschev agreement made & the Bay of Pigs. Dulles HATED Both Kennedys, had the power & means ta reach deep...& wouldn't be the first time he'd orchestrated a plan to overthrow a government or execute its leader. And from what I've gathered, was either Pure Evil, or had some Grandiose Belief, that in ALL instances he knew what was "best for the nation", and either way had No Conscience about the consequences of any actions taken or crime committed...ends ALWAYS justified the means, in his mind. Definitely had ties with the Mafia characters that were brought in ta execute Castro. So, He'd had Waaaaay more experience in formulatin' plans of ungentlemanly warfare than Edgar Hoover or Lyndon B Johnson. Kind'a makes them two dudes look like rookies. If he'd Wanted, Dulles could'a done everything we've seen or know, framed it on one or other or both, covered it up forever. So, Don't rule out the CIA director that John Kennedy fired.
I worked with an Architect in Dallas in 1983 and when he was young, his family was there that day in 1963. They had a banner that said "Stop and shake hands" and the Limo DID stop and they got amazing snapshots of the moment. The Architect was being interviewed about the anniversary on TV and brought his family photos to work to share with us. They were the kind of instant photo with scalloped edges. They kept them in a safe deposit. So earie to see Jackie and Jack up close in personal pictures right at the instant. Minutes later...
Wow!! Thank you so much for sharing!! How fascinating yet heartbreaking. I don’t blame them for storing those photos like they did. Sadly, it’s something you’d have to consider doing but it’s heartwarming at the same time those photos meant so much to them & they were so protective & selective of who they shared their priceless moment with 🥹🥹
Yes. The driver of Kennedy’s limousine turned to see if he was dead and stopped the car entirely before the fatal headshot. The film we are shown has been doctored by the CIA.
Threatening to dissolve the CIA what his demise. CIA, Ruth Paine, dissident Bay Of Pigs survivors were the inner circle. LHO knew about the plan, but never knew he would be set up to take the fall!
My visit to Dallas and the crime scene was i was amazed with the parade route, how close the buildings were to the streets and how many easy shot windows were available. Twenty shooters could have had very easy shots.
A heavy price to pay for both Kennedy Brothers. Before he was assassinated, RFK admitted that he may have killed his brother by not backing off on the trials against the mob.
They had to be stupid back then what is a ride in an open car like that and all them open windows they can put a man on the moon figure out how to do that I could not protect the president how stupid we look
Kennedy is very clearly seen in Zapruder's film to suffer a massive exit wound exploding at the right temple and absolutely nothing happening at the back of the head, consistent only with a shot from behind. Connally's said the shots came from behind. Witnesses directly under the sixth floor window firmly said the shots all came from directly overhead. Those witnesses had a clear view behind the knoll fence and would plainly have seen any gunman there. Autopsy shows the shots came from behind. Parkland doctors examined the autopsy photos on NOVA in 1988 and had no particular problem with them. All bullets and fragments ever found were matched to Oswald's rifle. It's vastly implausible anybody would ever assume they would frame this on a lone shooter while firing from multiple directions.
@@davidlake867 Yeah, we know the routine: any evidence points at Oswald, it's all been faked, any witnesses point at Oswald, they're all liars, any investigators point at Oswald, they're all traitors, and as always, I don't see you making the slightest attempt to actually address one word of the hard, credible and demonstrable evidence I listed, just sit there heaving a childish, snide wisecrack like that settles the whole matter.
There was NO damage to the back of JFKs head!...The good Dr. was looking downward, into the large defect that extended along the upper side of the head. and extended somewhat to the rear. Try reading a book!
It was really bad in hindsight but kennedy was the one who didn’t even want them on the car bc he wanted to seem “open” or available I can’t remember how it was worded. But to think they used to allow them to ride in those cars like that. Carter walked down Pennsylvania Avenue for his inauguration (I could be wrong on the street but you get the idea) just different time back then
JFK refused to use the bubble top nor did he want the SS on the bumpers or sideboards-he wanted the crowds to see him & Jackie-don’t blame the SS for that.
I was only five years old when JFK was assassinated. I can remember my Mother taking me, my sister and my two brothers to my Grandmother's and me, my siblings and my cousins were all sitting on blankets and watched several reports about JFK. It still bothers me. I can still remember how upset my Mother, my Aunt and my grandmother were. It was such a sad and tragic day. Definitely a day in history that we will never forget.
If you could have been bothered to watch the entire clip before letting Oswald off the hook you would have seen he only says he is a patsy in relation to being hassled by cops for having lived in Russia and in fact he never attempted to blow any conspiracy to any cop, any member of his family, or to a live TV audience of millions, never mind there's a mountain of evidence for his guilty anyway.
If you could have been bothered to watch the entire clip you would have seen he only says he is a patsy in relation to being hassled by cops for having lived in Russia, and in fact he never tried to blow any conspiracy to anybody.
@aaronz7056 he had already been telling people he never shot anyone and nobody was hassling him into saying that, that's why the j mafia who rubenstein was affiliated with gave him orders to take Oswald out so he wouldn't testify. An there's even evidence that there was two Oswalds but I can't go into all that here bc it will get deleted
Best treatment of the assassination I've ever seen, as others have commented. First time I've ever seen the "triangle paradigm" described here as well as all the evidence the FBI hid.
"Triangle paradigm..." Fiester and that clown Wecht never bothered addressing the following: a) All bullets and fragments ever found were matched only to Oswald's rifle. b) Victims' reactions in Zapruder's film, 1-2 frames apart, clearly demonstrate they are hit by the same bullet, and ergo, from behind. c) Connally was demonstrably seated lower, inboard and turned sharply to his right, the victims' wounds demonstrably lining up on a trajectory and tracking straight back to the sixth floor window. d) View of the entry wound on Connally's back would demonstrably have been blocked by Kennedy's body, meaning the same bullet has to have gone through both of them, and therefore, from behind. e) Bullet recovered from the stretcher is badly crushed at the nose and flattened down one side. f) That condition is consistent with going through Kennedy without hitting bone, slowing and tumbling on leaving him, then broadsiding its way through Connally's ribs, as medical and forensic evidence clearly demonstrate. g) That bullet was also matched to Oswald's rifle. h) Kennedy is very clearly seen to suffer a massive exit wound explode at the right temple, consistent only with a shot from behind. i) Connally's said the shots came from behind. j) Autopsy shows the shots came from behind. k) Parkland doctors had no particular problem with the autopsy photos when they examined them on NOVA in 1988. l) Virtually every witness said the shots came from EITHER the Depository or the knoll, and not from both... and shots DEFINIETLY came from the Depository. m) Witnesses directly under the sixth floor window firmly said the shots all came from directly over their heads. n) Those witnesses had a demonstrably clear view behind the knoll fence and would plainly have seen any gunman there. o) Zapruder's secretary was only yards away from the fence and heard and saw nobody there. p) How stupid would it be to assume you would frame this all on a lone shooter while firing away on the victim from multiple directions with different guns and bullets?
@@aharris8292 Ah, no, buddy the hard, credible and demonstrable evidence I just listed above is not "wrong," much less on all levels, don't be absurd, and your posting little laughing emojis instead of making the slightest attempt to actually address one word of any of it hardly negates it.
I was a child at that time but still remember the emotions my Mom had. Now as a Grandma I only wonder if current events might have been an attempt to do a repeat.
Hi ,there, in Europe we are amazed this is happening so boldly in front of the WORLD scandalous, the CORRUPTION has no limits ,I'm past half of my life , no house no family, times are hard in our so advanced COUNTRIES, Thank you ,good health to you
Big difference though between then and now such as Trump isn’t current President and there was a hit list of numerous individuals, including Biden, Merrick Garland and several others.
All the intelligence agencies have always been run by corrupt people. Some agents are good people but it’s the leadership that fails them over and over. The directors of these agencies should be titled accurately. They are politicians
And how, exactly, does "the CIA" safely approach scores and scores of witnesses, police, FBI, Secret Service, military personnel, doctors, pathologists, ballistics experts, photographers, x-ray technicians, whole commissions, lawyers, senators, congressmen, Oswald family members, etc., and persuade them all to obey illegal orders and bend over backwards making themselves all eternally loyal accessories to murder and treason?
It's Obama who can't be compared to Kennedy. Kennedy was astronomically above Obama, who was AT BEST mediocre. The ONLY President to meet or exceed JFK was Ronald Reagan. Both Kennedy brothers had HUGE enemies with means, motives, and opportunities to get rid of them: Lyndon Johnson, Hoover at the FBI, the CIA, and La Cosa Nostra are at the top of the list. And Hoover had the Secret Service heavily infiltrated, so they were co-opted. Keep in mind that these agencies had far less oversight back then, and LCN was still ENORMOUSLY POWERFUL. Not like today.
Obama 😢 was the Catalyst for changing US left wing to radical ideology , has wreaked untold damage . Obama not fit to be mentioned in a sentence with Kennedy
All credible ballistic, medical, forensic, film and eyewitness evidence demonstrate the shots all came from the sixth floor window, and from Oswald's rifle. Who, exactly, would ever assume they'd frame this on Oswald as they stood directly in front of the limo and shot Kennedy in the face?
So you've got somebody assuming they will frame this all on Oswald in the Depository window behind the limo while a guy on the overpass shoots Kennedy in the face. Yeah, that's brilliant.
The reason Beverly Oliver is such a threat to the Warren Report Apologists is that she not only witnessed the assassination, and took photos of it, she also knew Jack Ruby and several of the dancers at the Carousel Club, and was introduced to Oswald by Ruby himself. Which completely destroys the notion of Ruby and Oswald not knowing each other which puts the WR in doubt.
@@gazza1196 We already have the truth, and have had it for 60 years. People like Oliver and Hoffman attempted to distract from the truth, as they regaled us with tales of self-promotion.
@@gazza1196 Nonsense. She is a threat to to the WR Apologist's grift. She not only was there in Dealey Plaza as a witness, she also met Oswald at the Carousel Club. There are only a handful of people who saw Oswald at the Carousel Club but because she was a performer at an adjacent club she frequented the club between shows and knew Ruby. She was introduced to Oswald as "working with the CIA."
@@aaronz7056 Yes, I would never worry about that "guy," who is (if the truth be told) the illegitimate twin half-stepbrother of none other than David Arbuckle. 🙄
You can easily prove--and it has been proven--that the official story is a load of BS. The magic bullet theory is where it all unravels. But there's a lot more to it.
a) Kennedy's clearly seen in Zapruder's film to suffer a massive exit wound at the temple consistent only with a shot from behind. b) All bullets and fragments ever found were matched to Oswald's rifle. c) Connally's said the shots came from behind. d) Autopsy shows the shots came from behind. e) Parkland doctors had no particular problem with the autopsy photos f) Witnesses directly under the sixth floor window firmly said the shots all came from directly overhead. g) Those witnesses had a clear view behind the knoll fence and would plainly have seen any gunman there. h) It's vastly implausible anybody would ever assume they would frame this on a lone shooter while firing from multiple directions.
@@nicknewman7848 I have listed hard, credible, demonstrable and documented evidence, and your posting a couple of laughing emojis is your idea of persuasively arguing against it...???
@@aaronz7056 Do you actually believe Connally's testimony? Do you think he is a credible witness? " c) Connally's (actual spelling) said the shots came from behind" is your quote.
How did the shooter(s) know the roof of the vehicle was going to be down that day???? Someone on the inside had to make sure it was down for sure correct?? Just saying
YES , SOME OF THE SECRET SERVICE AGENTS HAD THIS ATTITUDE I’M NOT GOING TO TAKE A BULLET FOR KENNEDY , BECAUSE OF KENNEDY’S STAND ON CIVIL RIGHTS FOR THE BLACKS !!!
You've gotta' love it when a UA-cam channel called "Real History" creates a thumbnail intentionally misrepresenting where JFK sat in the limousine that day. The photo is flipped horizontally so Kennedy appears to be sitting to Mrs. Kennedy's left when, in fact, he was sitting to her right. This being done for the singular purpose of creating a thumbnail with a more pleasant composition. And so it goes....
My late Uncle was working for Southwestern Bell on an installation job a couple of miles from Dealey Plaza that day. His Supervisor came in, told the workers what happened; then sent everyone home. Like a large number of people, he assumed this was the prelude to WW3; & wanted his people home w/their families.
@@jimmyc1518. I was all of five years old. I understood ‘something’ had happened as my normal tv diet of afternoon cartoons were off, but was too young to understand why. My family (Corporate Nomads) were living in Huntsville, AL; as the home of the Army’s Redstone Arsenal & NASA’s Marshall Space Flight Center, Huntsville would have been a prime target as it likely was during the Cuban Missile Crisis, that I do not recall nor remember my parents reacting to that.
That grifting clown ignores and flatly contradicts hard, credible, documented and demonstrable evidence, she eliminates nothing except her own credibility.
Biggest takeaway that there was a conspiracy is Dallas PD didn’t have any notes from the interrogations. Not withstanding was the Chief announcement of LHO guilt.
I agree with the lady who did the trajectory angles that shot came from the front she eveb proved its plausible no way oswald can shoot from 6th floor with precision
That's right: there's "no way" a Marine who scored 18 out of 20 in rapid fire at targets 200 yards away as per his Marines scorebook could have hit a slow-moving target he had a clear view of a maximum of 88 yards away...
@aaronz7056 you've never shot at a moving target, apparently. Just because you can hit a target on a range doesn't mean that you can hit one in a moving vehicle. It's harder than you think. And why was there no gunshot residue found on Oswald? No fingerprints found on the rifle initially, but suddenly, days later, after the rifle had been checked by the FBI and the Dallas police, they suddenly found a palm print on the third try?
@@aharris8292 Swell, buddy. Did I mention the following? Oswald tested positive on his hands and it's right there in the commission exhibits. The palm print was latent. Kennedy was travelling slowly on a downhill grade that made him a nearly stationary target from the point of view of the sixth floor window. All bullets and fragments ever found were matched to Oswald's rifle. Victim's reactions in Zapruder's film, 1-2 frames apart, clearly demonstrate they are hit by the same bullet, and ergo, from behind. Victims' wounds demonstrably line up on a trajectory and track straight back to the sixth floor window. Kennedy is very clearly seen to suffer a massive exit wound exploding at the right temple consistent only with a shot from behind. Connally's said the shots came from behind. Autopsy shows the shots came from behind. Parkland doctors had no particular problem with the autopsy photos. Witnesses directly under the sixth floor window firmly said the shots all came from directly overhead. No unidentified persons were ever seen inside the building by anybody. Oswald was the only employee inside the building during the shooting to immediately flee and never return. Oswald just shrugged a hollow, rambling reply when asked on live TV, "Did you shoot the President?"
@aaronz7056 everything you just wasted your time writing has been debunked. You have any evidence of any of that. Everyone knows the Warren commission is a lie. Stop being so naive.
@aaronz7056 just because Oswald left, it doesn't make hom a criminal. It doesn't look good but it doesn't mean that he did it. Latent palm print? Don't be so gullible. The weapon had been handles by multiple people that worked for different agencies. Get a clue.
The Grassy Knoll shot was possibly a distraction. Given Emmett Hudson's testimony and the reaction of the 2 men standing with him clearly proves a shot from the knoll but, Fiester's analysis is the most accurate.
I've wondered why no photos or film from the other side of the overpass. Streets lined with folks but like nobody's on the other side of overpass? Add very limited news media. That's strange as well.
I think the streets were lined with people, this was to the overpass most people were further in the streets back there, the route was longer than only that part.
@@concerta56 Oswald owned the rifle. Oswald smuggled the rifle. Oswald's latent print was on the rifle. Oswald lied to police about his whereabouts during the shooting. Oswald had every bullet and fragment ever found matched to his rifle. Oswald was a perfectly plausible match to the shooter seen in the window. Oswald was in a building where no unidentified persons were ever seen by anybody. Oswald scored 18 out of 20 in rapid fire at targets 200 yards away as per his Marines scorebook. Kennedy was a slow-moving target a maximum of 88 yards away. Victims' reactions in Zapruder's film clearly demonstrate 3 shots over 8-9 seconds with several seconds between each. Victims' reactions in Zapruder's film clearly demonstrate they are hit by the same bullet, and ergo, from behind. Within 1-2 frames of Kennedy being hit, Connally's lapel pops out, his hat flips up, his shoulder is driven down, and his expression violently contorts between frames from the blow and his lung collapsing, all demonstrating they are hit by the same bullet, and ergo from behind. Connally was demonstrably seated lower, inboard and turned sharply to his right. The victims' wounds demonstrably line up on a trajectory and track straight back to the sixth floor window. View of the entry wound on Connally's back would demonstrably have been blocked by Kennedy's body, ergo the same bullet has to have gone through both of them, and ergo, from behind. Bullet recovered from the stretcher is badly crushed at the nose and flattened down one side. That condition is consistent with going through Kennedy without hitting bone, slowing and tumbling on leaving him, then broadsiding its way through Connally's ribs, as medical and forensic evidence clearly demonstrate. Kennedy is very clearly seen in Zapruder's film to suffer a massive exit wound exploding at the right temple consistent only with a shot from behind. Connally's said the shots came from behind. Autopsy shows the shots came from behind. Parkland doctors examined the autopsy photos on NOVA in 1988 and had no particular problem with them. Witnesses directly under the sixth floor window firmly said the shots all came from directly overhead. Those witnesses had a demonstrably clear view behind the knoll fence and would plainly have seen any gunman there. Zapruder's secretary was only yards away from the fence and heard and saw nobody there. It's utterly implausible anybody would ever assume they would frame this on a lone shooter while firing from multiple directions with different guns and bullets. Oswald was the only employee inside the building during the shooting to immediately flee the plaza, never returning. Oswald took evasive action by cab to sneak back to his rooming house. Oswald ignored his cab driver when he asked about the commotion in the streets. Oswald ignored his landlady when she spoke to him. There is no evidence Oswald was ever in contact with any "co-conspirators" from the time he arrived at the Paine house Nov. 21 until his death Nov. 24. Oswald was ID'd by nearly a dozen witnesses as shooting Officer Tippit and fleeing. Oswald owned and was in possession of the revolver the shells were matched to. Oswald was plainly seen trying to hide from passing police in a storefront. Oswald was plainly seen ducking into a theater to dodge more passing police. Oswald discarded his jacket, complete with fibres consistent with his shirt, between the crime scene and the theater. Oswald was caught red-handed trying to shoot a second cop in the theater. Oswald fought police so violently 3 officers were injured just disarming him. Oswald's actions are consistent with a guy attempting suicide-by-cop. Oswald observed, "Well, they say it only takes a minute to die" after asking about the penalty for cop-killing. Oswald refused to cooperate with any investigator. Oswald acted so smug he even convinced his own brother he was guilty. Oswald slept like a baby in his cell. Oswald turned down help offered by H. Louis Nichols, President of the Dallas Bar Association. Oswald was only interested in a lawyer he'd never met living in another state who specialized in left-wing causes. Oswald never attempted to blow any conspiracy sacrificing him to any cop, any member of his family, to Nichols, or to a live TV audience of millions. Oswald just shrugged a hollow, rambling reply when asked on live TV, "Did you shoot the President?"
Oswald couldn't have been framed because no one could have known in advance that he wouldn't have an alibi. The police didn't frame Oswald. He framed himself.
I have watched the slow motion video many times under a magnifying glass and it is my belief that the head shot was from the right where the picket fence is the bullet entering Jfks right temple exiting through the back of his head blowing away his back skull and brain matter.
If you've watched a slow motion version of the Zapruder film, then you must've seen the moment when he gets hit in the head and his head initially moves forward before recoiling. Not shot from the front.
For every second of the Zapruder film, there are 6 frames missing, because the CIA intercepted it while it was in mail transit over the weekend, end edited it down from 24 frames per second (in the original) and printed a copy that appeared to have been shot at 18 frames per second. And there's an ink blot somewhere to cover up some blood on his head.
@bobholtzmann dude, come on. The film was used in a court of law trying to prove a conspiracy. What are you saying, they used a tampered copy? They also made 3 copies the day of the assassination. Bootlegs started circulating very quickly. Which one was tampered with? Why was the film tampered with and not destroyed? Why was the film tampered with but not confiscated like Beverly Oliver and Gordon Arnold claim their films were? Why wasn't the Nix film tampered with? Why wasn't the Muchmore film tampered with???
I was in 3rd grade in South Texas. Our teacher, Mrs. Cross came back into the classroom, crying. She told us we were all going home early at 2pm. For a little boy, I was confused but when told by my mother what happened, I still didn't understand why anyone would want to shoot anyone who hadn't screwed with them in the first place.
You answered it by questioning it... Who was keneddy screwing with.. cia was screwed fbi was screwed mob as screwed and the military industrial complex got screwed by Kennedy. They were all corrupt... Also why did a night club owner with heavy mob ties just all the sudden get taken over by a sudden wash of becoming the righteous hand that had to make things right and kill the man who killed the president
I was a third grader in the Texas Panhandle near Amarillo. We were actually discussing the president visiting our state when the principal made the announcement the president was killed. We were sent home early and I watched everything on tv all weekend including Oswald getting shot and him saying he was just a patsy. Never forgot that.
This is the most ridiculous sentence on this thread. ALL the evidence points to Oswald's guilt: his rifle, 3 cartridges from his rifle, the bullet and bullet fragments were proven to be from his rifle. He was the ONLY employee from the TSBD to flee the scene. Innocent people don't flee! Guilty beyond doubt! Case Closed!!
It was a political move by Kennedy himself. He wanted to be seen by the crowd because he was trying to win support for the 64 election in a very red state. There's no point in having a motorcade if you can't be seen.
Files was a Convenient Scapegoat by Choice. I suspect strongly that the CIA, who led the Coalition to murder JFK,, put him up to his Fraud. The Intel Agencies literally Control the Media worldwide and Files was Made into a Mini-Celebrity obviously with the Blessing of the Elites and Intel Agencies to further Muddy the Waters. The Actual Assassins hired by the CIA were most likely Murdered themselves shortly after the assassination. These were Elites who ordered the Hit and Loose Ends are Rarely Allowed. When dealing with these Evil Agencies you always have to consider that they stack Multiple Layers of Deception so that if you figure out one Psyop then the Layer underneath will keep you from learning the Truth. And if that one doesn't fool you, the next Layer of Lies will. They've been doing this a long time and their good at it. Personal experice here..
No; his story's been debunked. The two shell casings (one dented by his bite) later unearthed behind the grassy knoll fence were indeed from Remington .22 spent ammo. But the manufacurer's factory identification markings on the base of the shells indicated the bullets were from a stock grouping made after 1963. They were probably planted by Files himself.
My Mom’s dad never liked the Kennedy’s. He was glad those days. The first time I watched this was in high school. I knew right off why they both got killed. I just didn’t know for a while who was all in on it. It’s still mind boggling today..
I walked the Plaza in 1999, 2006, and another year in between those dates...strange, but as a deer hunter from the Ozarks, I selected a location inside the 26 degree cone as a possible shooting position about 20 years ago due to witness accounts of a projectile penetrating the windshield from the front. However I discounted it since there were 3 men standing on the triple overpass about 50 yards to the left, and none of them heard a shot to their right, but they did say they saw smoke come out from under the trees in front of the picket fence. I must say it looked like smoke but was most likely dust from the leaves on the tree as the shockwave of the blast of gasses that were expelled from the barrel of the rifle when fired. Modern rifles use smokeless powder today and since the late 19th century.
She didn't try to get a piece of skull off the car, she herself said she did not remember the moment, every who has experienced something traumatic knows that every sense of conciousness leaves you, and you go into full survival mode, she probably saw his throat being shot, wondering at first what happened to her Husband, then she heard another shot, and tried Jumping out of the way of Danger, she probably tried to cover his wounds somewhat on the way to the hospital, but in no freaking way in hell did she try to collect a piece of skull in a shocked Panic moment, her survival instincts were obviously kicking in, and that has nothing to do with cowardness, it is compeltely natural.
In no way, when he was shot, she instantly thought "Oh i have to collect the piece of skull!!!" which in that quick second probably didn't even registrate with her due to shock.
Both you guys commenting bout Mrs Kennedy trying to self preserve herself is pure horsecrap..she didn't have any memories of even crawling on the back of the car but when she arrived at parkland she handed the head nurse that part of the skull she retrieved from the trunk of the limousine and said will this help and also clint hill also testified and has said in interviews he watched her pick up a peice of jfks skull off the trunk. People who believe otherwise are conspiracy theory nutjobs..
Kimberly-cx9uv You people are just projecting your fantasies onto Jackie. You don't know what thoughts she might have had, either rational or irrational in nature.
If Oswald was going to assassinate JFK, ask yourself why he didn't shoot JFK right between the eyes in a Straight On Shot as the Limo was approaching Oswald while it was on Houston Street before it turned onto Elm.. Here's your Answer.. The actual Team of Assassins needed the Limo to turn onto Houston to enter a Virtual Kill Box where it could not Turn either way and could ouly move ether Forward or Backward without escaper from Multiple Teams of Assassins. Had the Assassins started shooting on Houston Street the Limo could have gone Forward, Backward or Turned Right onto Elm and Escaped the assassination! Also, had the Secret Service, which was Complicit in the murder, NOT tried to evade the assassination at that point, it would have been glaringly obvious and they would have certianly been Prosecuted also. This is only one of the Key Points of this murder along with much evidence that the government gathered itself that convicts.. the government..
Would you do that with all the eyes of the SS facing you? This wasn't a suicide mission for him, he was trying to escape. If he had fired when they were facing him, no doubt the building would've been sealed instantly amd he would've gotten caught in minutes.
@franclin0 If you don’t dig too deep, the story as presented to us appears to be rational and somewhat plausible. In reality, the thesis of Oswald as the lone assassin is a well thought out and long planned cover story that was designed to create plausible deniability for those involved. The assassination was the most significant event in world history and the perpetrators prepared accordingly. In the end, Oswald was, just as he had told us, a patsy.
I was in my 8th grade typing class when we got the news about President Kennedy being shot. The principal came over the intercom with the announcement. It was 8 days before my 14th birthday.
Yes it was 100 of these eye witnesses and they probably had all seen something significant. Because within that year they had all died from one thing or another, not of natural Causes. well, maybe two of Cancer.
The human memory is notoriously fickle, especially when it comes to remembering details. Years of research has found that our brains tend to fill in the missing gaps with fiction or other memories when we cannot remember the specifics.
And how, exactly, do you safely approach the Secret Service, the CIA, and the FBI, and persuade them all to obey illegal orders, assist a bloody coup, and bend over backwards making themselves all eternally loyal accessories to murder and treason?
And you safely approach the Secret Service, the CIA and the FBI (as well as the police, military personnel, whole commissions, etc.), and persuade them all to trust each other implicitly, obey illegal orders and bend over backwards making themselves all eternally loyal accessories to murder and treason HOW, exactly...?
@@isabellindlind That is far too limited. It is about much more than that, including that people just like thinking that they are onto something that others don't have the ability to see. It makes them feel superior and clever. There are many more factors, as well.
I was in Houston Texas when l heard of it over the radio. I was downtown about 6 blocks from Main street. I immediately closed the parking lot that l was working at and l started walking towards Main street. l remember seeing some girls crying and walking towards me. My brother was in the Army and at Fort Polk in Lousiana. He said his company was taken in from the fields and everything there was big time status.
✌️✌️✌️I'll try and come back to watch your presentation... I saw it the event, the Murder, of JFK as it unfolded...in a fifth grade classroom of a Catholic School in Dallas Texas... A special day for Catholics. they rolled TVs into the classroom... we all watched with pride... but then... time stopped... we started screaming and pointing at the TV... Shouting, and Asking our teachers why police did not chase them. All of us kids saw two men clothed in what today we would call a bodysuit... Head to toe black ...both carrying rifles... 😮 Running across highway 35 on train tracks into a 5 story building in which I discovered years later as an adult... that the 3rd floor ..well, there was no 3rd floor...for public.✌️🤠🐒 Oswald is innocent of that he was eating lunch when the event took place.. you can research the timeline yourself
Not possible. The assassination was not televised. CBS was the 1st to break thru (As The World Turns) with an audio of Walter Cronkite. It took several minutes for TV tubes to warm up before they went live with video. This event changed the TV studios forever as moving forward they always had the tubes up and running. There were no TV cameras in Dealey Plaza or in the motorcade. The Zapruder Film was not seen by the public for many many years later.
Witnesses directly under the sixth floor window firmly said the shots all came from directly overhead, they had a clear view behind the knoll fence and would plainly have seen any gunman there.
@@AMC2283 Your childish insult in noted and I repeat what I just said. In addition: Every bullet and fragment ever found were matched to Oswald's rifle. Victims' reactions in Zapruder's film, 1-2 frames apart, demonstrate they are hit by the same bullet, and ergo from behind. Kennedy is seen in the film to suffer a massive exit wound at the temple consistent only with a shot from behind. Connally's said the shots came from behind. Autopsy shows the shots came from behind. Parkland doctors examined the autopsy photos on NOVA in 1988 and had no particular problem with them. It's vastly implausible anybody would ever assume they would frame this on a lone shooter while firing from multiple directions.
@@aaronz7056 "Childish insult"? That's ripe coming from you, mate. You're the King of obstinate belligerence. If anything the Z film does not prove they were hit by the same bullet, Aaron. Sorry. the man hit by a bullet said he was in the process of turning back round when he was struck. The visual evidence strongly suggests the 'throat reaction bullet' did not hit JC.. unless he casually turned round after he was hit and then turned back again before lying down. Last time we spoke you suggested he was describing turning around behind the sign where we couldn't see him on film. That doesn't work either because he's still trying to look over his shoulder and turn around after Kennedy is hit in the throat. You avoided explaining that one. That you (detailed as you are) are selectively blind to the unscientific approach to the crux of the whole thing and this particular flaw in Specters theory (which he himself admitted decades later was only speculation and not fact) kind of ruins your credibility as a lone gunman absolutist. If you can't prove Arlen's crappy theory you can't prove single shooter and all your dissertations are a waste of time. Cheers, mate 🤣
All credible ballistic, medical, forensic, film and eyewitness evidence clearly demonstrate the shots all came from the sixth floor window, and from Oswald's rifle.
That street was set up by the book building all the way down to the under pass was set up it was not like the other streets were you had a lot of people that by the time it got to and the end of the street it was completely different from the other streets where everything happened so fast and not many were their were you can get away and the only thing was that lee harvey oswald was I in a movie theater to see a movie so he would not have to go back to work at the book building for the afternoon but go home for dinner
In the movie theater that would keep him their for a long time and be able to go home to have his dinner and not have to go to work until Monday morning to do his job at the book building
Despite my beliefs that Oswald did not act alone.. 187 feet is absolutely nothing when it comes to shooting a rifle with a scope on it.. most people sight their scope in at 333 feet and you don’t even start getting into difficult shooting until about 2500 foot down range and even then it takes minor skill and adjustment to even do that.. stop acting like the distance was anything at all worth noting and start pointing out the time it takes in between shots is more worth looking at.
The kid was not a good marksman per his history with peer rifle club. He was not "an assassin" he was a disturbed young white male - - classic profile for a school or other shooter.
@9Ballr Oswald did not have that much time. Closer to 6 seconds. One shot missed entirely. And this is all presuming Oswald was a shooter and the only one.
@@harveycan5820 No, he had closer to 8.4 seconds between the first shot and the third shot. We can calculate that using the Zapruder film, which runs at 18.3 frames per second. We know the second shot occurred right around frame 223. A conservative estimate would put the first shot around frame 155 (it may very well have been before that, as it may not even be on the Zapruder film, which first shows the limo in frame 133). The second shot is at frame 223. That's 68 frames between the first and second shot, at 18.3 frames per second, which would be about 3.75 seconds between the first and second shot. The third shot occurs at frame 313, which means there are 90 frames between the second and third shots. At 18.3 frames per second, that's 4.9 seconds between the second and third shots. 3.75 + 4.9 = 8.65 seconds between the first and third shots.
@@harveycan5820 Oswald was adept at hitting bullseyes shooting rapid-fire at 200 yards and 300 yards, per his performance on his Marine Corps shooting tests. The distance to the fatal head shot was about 88 yards.
This was a very well done documentary. With that being said, it was totally inappropriate to include the glowing commentary on President Obama at the end of the film!!!!! I have lived through Presidents from Eisenhower to Biden and Obama by far was the worst in my lifetime!!!!!! Next time the producers should just stick to the subject at hand rather than shilling!!!!!
Agreed, Obama is an Arab Traitor. His middle name is Hussein. He and his wife are worth 70 million dollars and own 4 mansions in various houses of the US, one of which is in Hawaii. Obama spent 14 years in government service. So where did all that $$$ come from? Book deals and speaking engagements?
Correct the doco I shot JFK by Jimmy Files has been re-released 2 days ago it goes for almost 3 hrs.ua-cam.com/video/44x5I-kP48o/v-deo.htmlsi=8E-1mHHZfy4cVmHy
I watched that interview with him aswell. It really doesn't matter who did the shooting. Where did the orders come from. The CIA, The MOB,The FBI. A lone wolf. That we will never know.
Because the amount of evidence to the contrary sold to us in the Warren Report! This country lost WAY MORE than JFK that day and now we are reaping the Fallout and it's SICKENING!!
I think with Trumps attempt, it has shown that there is indeed something fishy, especially today with people on medias where they can easily tell their side of the story, such as twitter, youtube, 4k Videos, you can't easily cover up shit, there definitely was something internally going on when Trump was shot
The hole was created from a remaining fragmented bullet that hit Kennedy from behind because parts of that bullet were found on the floor board of the limousine..it wasn't a through and through hole..do some more research its in the the Warren commission report..bet you didn't know that did you.
no... the secret service vehicle ahead of him... they secret service officer pulled out a rifle and when the car accelerated he accidently pulled trigger. but yes it came from that direction. ive heard there was a hole in windshield aswell
@@robzajac5400 Story is flatly contradicted by eyewitness, film, photo, ballistic and medical evidence, and Agent Hickey successfully sued the publishers of the crackpot book accusing him. Only damage to the windshield, still in the National Archives, is a bad crack caused by a bullet fragment that also damaged the chrome plating... from the inside.
The Doctors In Dallas Were More Honest Than The Ones In Bethesda Naval Hospital Maryland
a) Dallas doctors are plainly seen at their first press conference speculating wildly about the wounds, unable to conjecture about numbers, trajectories, etc.
b) Those doctors are also seen on NOVA in 1988 having no particular problem with the autopsy photos.
@@aaronz7056 Great release all info unredacted..................
more honest?... typical american answer; - either you are honest or dishonest...
That day was a turning point for this country,We continue to talk of it because we are still affected by it,
It was a turning point because we no longer really have a country. The agencies do but we don't.
An old line from a movie called Thunder Heart;
You don't have freedom. You have the illusion of freedom.
In case anyone didn’t know Vice President and FBI Director didn’t like JFK
Take that to a grand jury.
Neither did the Ex-director of the CIA, that was fired by JFK.
& Dulles had tentacles.
@@Bass-n-Boom What's that got to do with the evidence in this case?
@@aaronz7056 I'm jus' sayin' Don't Stop from lookin' further than LBJ & Hoover, especially since the CIA was pissed after the JFK/ Khruschev agreement made & the Bay of Pigs.
Dulles HATED Both Kennedys, had the power & means ta reach deep...& wouldn't be the first time he'd orchestrated a plan to overthrow a government or execute its leader.
And from what I've gathered, was either Pure Evil, or had some Grandiose Belief, that in ALL instances he knew what was "best for the nation", and either way had No Conscience about the consequences of any actions taken or crime committed...ends ALWAYS justified the means, in his mind.
Definitely had ties with the Mafia characters that were brought in ta execute Castro.
So, He'd had Waaaaay more experience in formulatin' plans of ungentlemanly warfare than Edgar Hoover or Lyndon B Johnson.
Kind'a makes them two dudes look like rookies.
If he'd Wanted, Dulles could'a done everything we've seen or know, framed it on one or other or both, covered it up forever.
So, Don't rule out the CIA director that John Kennedy fired.
@@aaronz7056might have literally everything to do with the lack of evidence in this case.
I worked with an Architect in Dallas in 1983 and when he was young, his family was there that day in 1963. They had a banner that said "Stop and shake hands" and the Limo DID stop and they got amazing snapshots of the moment. The Architect was being interviewed about the anniversary on TV and brought his family photos to work to share with us. They were the kind of instant photo with scalloped edges. They kept them in a safe deposit. So earie to see Jackie and Jack up close in personal pictures right at the instant. Minutes later...
Wow!! Thank you so much for sharing!! How fascinating yet heartbreaking. I don’t blame them for storing those photos like they did. Sadly, it’s something you’d have to consider doing but it’s heartwarming at the same time those photos meant so much to them & they were so protective & selective of who they shared their priceless moment with 🥹🥹
"Eerie," not "earie." There is no such word as "earie."
@historyman4629 adj. prone to eavesdropping, noticing distant sounds, or playing songs without sheet music. Earie.
Yes. The driver of Kennedy’s limousine turned to see if he was dead and stopped the car entirely before the fatal headshot. The film we are shown has been doctored by the CIA.
@@BobbyG-VB Earie, wingnut ears.
Brent Holland is one of the best Documentarians in the country. Thank you Brent Holland.
This one is better in my opinion.
ua-cam.com/video/niTwvtokYf0/v-deo.htmlsi=nU9Lgohu6Ph_OcLF
Thank you so very very much!
@@nightfrightshow, thanks for responding!
Threatening to dissolve the CIA what his demise.
CIA, Ruth Paine, dissident Bay Of Pigs survivors were the inner circle.
LHO knew about the plan, but never knew he would be set up to take the fall!
No one can lie better than govts.
My visit to Dallas and the crime scene was i was amazed with the parade route, how close the buildings were to the streets and how many easy shot windows were available. Twenty shooters could have had very easy shots.
they say it was the driver of the limo
Come on ! That's such BULLSHIT! All the occupants in the limousine would have heard a gun going off! @@jonveetoo9258
Right I just passed through not that long ago and I said the same thing too gave me the chills
There were 5 shooters, 13 shots. The last two came from behind Zapruder, just to his right.
A lot of horrific memories of that entire weekend. I think because it happened when I was a school kid nothing since really shocks me anymore.
NOT BECAUSE THEY ARE EASY, BUT BECAUSE THEY ARE HARD
It was a stupid question
That's what SHE said.
My grandparents were in the rooftop restaurant at the Dallas Morning News that day and said it changed them that day.
The Dallas News Restaurant had that effect on many people.
I have watched a LOT of documentaries about JFK's murder and this is by far the absolute best I've seen. Job well done!
I think this is even better-
ua-cam.com/video/niTwvtokYf0/v-deo.htmlsi=nU9Lgohu6Ph_OcLF
I agree
@@masclinemancalvindaniels2707 Very kind my friend, Gd Bless
Bless you
This documentary is misleading. Who it is suggesting did it did not do it. I know who did but I can't say it here.
61 years ago today. I was three years old, don't remember any of it. Lots of memories from parents and (much) older siblings.
A heavy price to pay for both Kennedy Brothers. Before he was assassinated, RFK admitted that he may have killed his brother by not backing off on the trials against the mob.
It wasn't the mob that did it.
Lol
My mother always thought it was either a mob hit, or a Castro
@@patriciastark1951 I think it’s a blend of all three but Bob Castro and her own government.
It wasn't just that. Big oil, Allen Dulles who JFK fired from the CIA. LBJ was about to be indicted.
I lived through it all. Not a good time for our country.
They had to be stupid back then what is a ride in an open car like that and all them open windows they can put a man on the moon figure out how to do that I could not protect the president how stupid we look
It also has lead to the Shit Show this country has become!!
I have lived it also. Harry Truman was president when I was born.
Do u think the assignation s were done by usa or outsiders
WE did it, the Greed has rotted this country from the core!!@@mrsniper247
The larger damage at the back of JFK’s head does seem to indicate his head was hit from the front.
Kennedy is very clearly seen in Zapruder's film to suffer a massive exit wound exploding at the right temple and absolutely nothing happening at the back of the head, consistent only with a shot from behind.
Connally's said the shots came from behind.
Witnesses directly under the sixth floor window firmly said the shots all came from directly overhead.
Those witnesses had a clear view behind the knoll fence and would plainly have seen any gunman there.
Autopsy shows the shots came from behind.
Parkland doctors examined the autopsy photos on NOVA in 1988 and had no particular problem with them.
All bullets and fragments ever found were matched to Oswald's rifle.
It's vastly implausible anybody would ever assume they would frame this on a lone shooter while firing from multiple directions.
@@aaronz7056 far out mate if you still believe the wr
@@davidlake867 Yeah, we know the routine: any evidence points at Oswald, it's all been faked, any witnesses point at Oswald, they're all liars, any investigators point at Oswald, they're all traitors, and as always, I don't see you making the slightest attempt to actually address one word of the hard, credible and demonstrable evidence I listed, just sit there heaving a childish, snide wisecrack like that settles the whole matter.
There was NO damage to the back of JFKs head!...The good Dr. was looking downward, into the large defect that extended along the upper side of the head. and extended somewhat to the rear. Try reading a book!
I don't see you making the slightest attempt to actually address one single word of the hard, credible and demonstrable evidence I just listed above.
How stupid was they letting him ride in an open car like that
Were not was cletus
It was really bad in hindsight but kennedy was the one who didn’t even want them on the car bc he wanted to seem “open” or available I can’t remember how it was worded. But to think they used to allow them to ride in those cars like that. Carter walked down Pennsylvania Avenue for his inauguration (I could be wrong on the street but you get the idea) just different time back then
JFK refused to use the bubble top nor did he want the SS on the bumpers or sideboards-he wanted the crowds to see him & Jackie-don’t blame the SS for that.
Because if "they" didn't, "they" couldn't have carried out their plan.
ua-cam.com/video/niTwvtokYf0/v-deo.htmlsi=nU9Lgohu6Ph_OcLF
I was only five years old when JFK was assassinated. I can remember my Mother taking me, my sister and my two brothers to my Grandmother's and me, my siblings and my cousins were all sitting on blankets and watched several reports about JFK. It still bothers me. I can still remember how upset my Mother, my Aunt and my grandmother were. It was such a sad and tragic day. Definitely a day in history that we will never forget.
Oswald.said.it.himself
Hes just a patsy
Oswald was telling the truth. They had to get rid of him so he wouldn't testify.
If you could have been bothered to watch the entire clip before letting Oswald off the hook you would have seen he only says he is a patsy in relation to being hassled by cops for having lived in Russia and in fact he never attempted to blow any conspiracy to any cop, any member of his family, or to a live TV audience of millions, never mind there's a mountain of evidence for his guilty anyway.
Oswald was guilty as hell. Youi don't know the evidence.
If you could have been bothered to watch the entire clip you would have seen he only says he is a patsy in relation to being hassled by cops for having lived in Russia, and in fact he never tried to blow any conspiracy to anybody.
@aaronz7056 he had already been telling people he never shot anyone and nobody was hassling him into saying that, that's why the j mafia who rubenstein was affiliated with gave him orders to take Oswald out so he wouldn't testify. An there's even evidence that there was two Oswalds but I can't go into all that here bc it will get deleted
Best treatment of the assassination I've ever seen, as others have commented. First time I've ever seen the "triangle paradigm" described here as well as all the evidence the FBI hid.
"Triangle paradigm..." Fiester and that clown Wecht never bothered addressing the following:
a) All bullets and fragments ever found were matched only to Oswald's rifle.
b) Victims' reactions in Zapruder's film, 1-2 frames apart, clearly demonstrate they are hit by the same bullet, and ergo, from behind.
c) Connally was demonstrably seated lower, inboard and turned sharply to his right, the victims' wounds demonstrably lining up on a trajectory and tracking straight back to the sixth floor window.
d) View of the entry wound on Connally's back would demonstrably have been blocked by Kennedy's body, meaning the same bullet has to have gone through both of them, and therefore, from behind.
e) Bullet recovered from the stretcher is badly crushed at the nose and flattened down one side.
f) That condition is consistent with going through Kennedy without hitting bone, slowing and tumbling on leaving him, then broadsiding its way through Connally's ribs, as medical and forensic evidence clearly demonstrate.
g) That bullet was also matched to Oswald's rifle.
h) Kennedy is very clearly seen to suffer a massive exit wound explode at the right temple, consistent only with a shot from behind.
i) Connally's said the shots came from behind.
j) Autopsy shows the shots came from behind.
k) Parkland doctors had no particular problem with the autopsy photos when they examined them on NOVA in 1988.
l) Virtually every witness said the shots came from EITHER the Depository or the knoll, and not from both... and shots DEFINIETLY came from the Depository.
m) Witnesses directly under the sixth floor window firmly said the shots all came from directly over their heads.
n) Those witnesses had a demonstrably clear view behind the knoll fence and would plainly have seen any gunman there.
o) Zapruder's secretary was only yards away from the fence and heard and saw nobody there.
p) How stupid would it be to assume you would frame this all on a lone shooter while firing away on the victim from multiple directions with different guns and bullets?
@@aaronz7056😂😅
Wrong on all levels
@@aharris8292 Ah, no, buddy the hard, credible and demonstrable evidence I just listed above is not "wrong," much less on all levels, don't be absurd, and your posting little laughing emojis instead of making the slightest attempt to actually address one word of any of it hardly negates it.
@aaronz7056 I'm not your buddy, and it's just plain wrong and most of it based on speculation. If you want to believe that, then more power to you.
I was a child at that time but still remember the emotions my Mom had. Now as a Grandma I only wonder if current events might have been an attempt to do a repeat.
Hi ,there, in Europe we are amazed this is happening so boldly in front of the WORLD scandalous, the CORRUPTION has no limits ,I'm past half of my life , no house no family, times are hard in our so advanced COUNTRIES,
Thank you ,good health to you
No question at all they tried this with trump .. I mean c'mon it's 2024 how can someone get that close and take so many shots
Big difference though between then and now such as Trump isn’t current President and there was a hit list of numerous individuals, including Biden, Merrick Garland and several others.
@@shellytompkins7254 That was a cover story. He was their plant.
Dude was in a BlackRock commercial.. case closed
The Secret Service. This was their dress rehearsal. Went so well, they thought they might try it again sometime.
The Secret Service back then also...
All the intelligence agencies have always been run by corrupt people. Some agents are good people but it’s the leadership that fails them over and over. The directors of these agencies should be titled accurately.
They are politicians
ua-cam.com/video/niTwvtokYf0/v-deo.htmlsi=nU9Lgohu6Ph_OcLF
And FBI !
@@efstratiosdiakoniarakis9517 & the democrat Johnson administration ..Now, they want the rest of us dead!
CIA
It was the CIA .....
And how, exactly, does "the CIA" safely approach scores and scores of witnesses, police, FBI, Secret Service, military personnel, doctors, pathologists, ballistics experts, photographers, x-ray technicians, whole commissions, lawyers, senators, congressmen, Oswald family members, etc., and persuade them all to obey illegal orders and bend over backwards making themselves all eternally loyal accessories to murder and treason?
No evidence that the CIA was involved.
Nope.
@@capnmnemoyup
I agree.
I don’t think that you can compare Kennedy with Obama
For instance, Kennedy was a serial cheater.
It's Obama who can't be compared to Kennedy. Kennedy was astronomically above Obama, who was AT BEST mediocre.
The ONLY President to meet or exceed JFK was Ronald Reagan.
Both Kennedy brothers had HUGE enemies with means, motives, and opportunities to get rid of them: Lyndon Johnson, Hoover at the FBI, the CIA, and La Cosa Nostra are at the top of the list. And Hoover had the Secret Service heavily infiltrated, so they were co-opted. Keep in mind that these agencies had far less oversight back then, and LCN was still ENORMOUSLY POWERFUL. Not like today.
Kenned was ten times better than Obama
Agreed
Obama 😢 was the Catalyst for changing US left wing to radical ideology , has wreaked untold damage .
Obama not fit to be mentioned in a sentence with Kennedy
I wonder if this is what our government had planned for Trump as well.
I wonder too
Imo , there’s no question 🤷
It was a blatant set up lol
The DEEP STATE ITS REAL
@@leo_zero1879I Agree
Too many commercials!
Knee deep with the Mafia
So it looks like a shot came from the triple overpass
All credible ballistic, medical, forensic, film and eyewitness evidence demonstrate the shots all came from the sixth floor window, and from Oswald's rifle. Who, exactly, would ever assume they'd frame this on Oswald as they stood directly in front of the limo and shot Kennedy in the face?
That would be impossible. There were police posted there along with a dozen railroad workers and a railroad supervisor.
So you've got somebody assuming they will frame this all on Oswald in the Depository window behind the limo while a guy on the overpass shoots Kennedy in the face. Yeah, that's brilliant.
The reason Beverly Oliver is such a threat to the Warren Report Apologists is that she not only witnessed the assassination, and took photos of it, she also knew Jack Ruby and several of the dancers at the Carousel Club, and was introduced to Oswald by Ruby himself. Which completely destroys the notion of Ruby and Oswald not knowing each other which puts the WR in doubt.
Beverly Oliver is a fraud. She wasn't in Dealey Plaza that day.
The reason Beverly Oliver is no threat at all to the Warren Report is because she's long-ago been outed as a total liar (and full-time fabricator).
She’s a fantasist.its people like her and Hoffman and there claims have made the search for the truth harder
@@gazza1196 We already have the truth, and have had it for 60 years.
People like Oliver and Hoffman attempted to distract from the truth, as they regaled us with tales of self-promotion.
@@gazza1196 Nonsense. She is a threat to to the WR Apologist's grift. She not only was there in Dealey Plaza as a witness, she also met Oswald at the Carousel Club. There are only a handful of people who saw Oswald at the Carousel Club but because she was a performer at an adjacent club she frequented the club between shows and knew Ruby. She was introduced to Oswald as "working with the CIA."
enjoyed this I've subscribed 👍
This elaborate plan couldn’t have been carried out by the mafia by themselves
What elaborate plan? A gunman shot Kennedy as he rode past him in a car.
What elaborate plan? All credible evidence demonstrates Oswald shot Kennedy as he rode past him in a limo.
There was no"elaborate plan."
@@stddisclaimer8020 Don't worry about this guy, he ignores every direct question and challenge ever put to his claims.
@@aaronz7056 Yes, I would never worry about that "guy," who is (if the truth be told) the illegitimate twin half-stepbrother of none other than David Arbuckle. 🙄
Awesomesauce! Thanks!
Remember, it's not what you KNOW, it's what you can PROVE.
What can you prove?
You can easily prove--and it has been proven--that the official story is a load of BS. The magic bullet theory is where it all unravels. But there's a lot more to it.
Thumbs UP.
RIGHT! The back of his head blew off BACKWARD! That's because the fatal shot came from low and in FRONT...the grassy area the car was heading toward!
a) Kennedy's clearly seen in Zapruder's film to suffer a massive exit wound at the temple consistent only with a shot from behind.
b) All bullets and fragments ever found were matched to Oswald's rifle.
c) Connally's said the shots came from behind.
d) Autopsy shows the shots came from behind.
e) Parkland doctors had no particular problem with the autopsy photos
f) Witnesses directly under the sixth floor window firmly said the shots all came from directly overhead.
g) Those witnesses had a clear view behind the knoll fence and would plainly have seen any gunman there.
h) It's vastly implausible anybody would ever assume they would frame this on a lone shooter while firing from multiple directions.
@@aaronz7056 🤣🤣🤣
@@nicknewman7848 I have listed hard, credible, demonstrable and documented evidence, and your posting a couple of laughing emojis is your idea of persuasively arguing against it...???
@@aaronz7056 Do you actually believe Connally's testimony? Do you think he is a credible witness? " c) Connally's (actual spelling) said the shots came from behind" is your quote.
@@claytonbigsby They said the shots came from behind and I literally just listed demonstrable evidence they were right.
She said that back of his head blew off. Means that bullet came from front of his head.
Would seem so.
Next video: "The Shinzo Abe Assassination: Hour By Hour As It Unfolded"
How did the shooter(s) know the roof of the vehicle was going to be down that day???? Someone on the inside had to make sure it was down for sure correct?? Just saying
YES , SOME OF THE SECRET SERVICE AGENTS HAD THIS ATTITUDE I’M NOT GOING TO TAKE A BULLET FOR KENNEDY , BECAUSE OF KENNEDY’S STAND ON CIVIL RIGHTS FOR THE BLACKS !!!
Very good point,friend!
Kennedy had plenty of motorcades without the bubbletop. If it was a nice day, the odds were extremely good the top wouldn't be up.
It was a very common practice back then to use convertibles for these events.
Had been raining earlier in the morning.
You've gotta' love it when a UA-cam channel called "Real History" creates a thumbnail intentionally misrepresenting where JFK sat in the limousine that day. The photo is flipped horizontally so Kennedy appears to be sitting to Mrs. Kennedy's left when, in fact, he was sitting to her right. This being done for the singular purpose of creating a thumbnail with a more pleasant composition. And so it goes....
My late Uncle was working for Southwestern Bell on an installation job a couple of miles from Dealey Plaza that day. His Supervisor came in, told the workers what happened; then sent everyone home. Like a large number of people, he assumed this was the prelude to WW3; & wanted his people home w/their families.
I'm sure it was a frightening experience for your uncle and his coworkers and felt like WW3 was imminent. Very dark day in our history.
@@jimmyc1518. I was all of five years old. I understood ‘something’ had happened as my normal tv diet of afternoon cartoons were off, but was too young to understand why. My family (Corporate Nomads) were living in Huntsville, AL; as the home of the Army’s Redstone Arsenal & NASA’s Marshall Space Flight Center, Huntsville would have been a prime target as it likely was during the Cuban Missile Crisis, that I do not recall nor remember my parents reacting to that.
@@jamessimms415Thank you,for sharing this.
This may be one of the best films on the wise ranging subject I've seen if for no other reason than Dr. McClellan. Thanks ever much
She eliminates the single shooter from behind as the government wants you to believe
She "eliminates" him by ignoring and flatly contradicting a lot of hard, credible and demonstrable evidence, the woman was a paranoid kook.
The government was correct!
That grifting clown ignores and flatly contradicts hard, credible, documented and demonstrable evidence, she eliminates nothing except her own credibility.
@@curbozerboomer1773 That idiot Fiester flatly ignored and contradicted the evidence, she hardly "eliminates" the single shooter. lol
She eliminates nothing, she ignored and flatly contradicted hard evidence in favour of crackpot, demonstrable lies.
Biggest takeaway that there was a conspiracy is Dallas PD didn’t have any notes from the interrogations. Not withstanding was the Chief announcement of LHO guilt.
I think it would b ultimate gesture of respect to release all info for Kennedy family then if they wanna share with us that'd b nice 💯
This video is a perfect example of perfect media disinformation.
Indeed it is. Completely ignores dimona.
I agree with the lady who did the trajectory angles that shot came from the front she eveb proved its plausible no way oswald can shoot from 6th floor with precision
That's right: there's "no way" a Marine who scored 18 out of 20 in rapid fire at targets 200 yards away as per his Marines scorebook could have hit a slow-moving target he had a clear view of a maximum of 88 yards away...
@aaronz7056 you've never shot at a moving target, apparently. Just because you can hit a target on a range doesn't mean that you can hit one in a moving vehicle. It's harder than you think. And why was there no gunshot residue found on Oswald? No fingerprints found on the rifle initially, but suddenly, days later, after the rifle had been checked by the FBI and the Dallas police, they suddenly found a palm print on the third try?
@@aharris8292 Swell, buddy. Did I mention the following?
Oswald tested positive on his hands and it's right there in the commission exhibits.
The palm print was latent.
Kennedy was travelling slowly on a downhill grade that made him a nearly stationary target from the point of view of the sixth floor window.
All bullets and fragments ever found were matched to Oswald's rifle.
Victim's reactions in Zapruder's film, 1-2 frames apart, clearly demonstrate they are hit by the same bullet, and ergo, from behind.
Victims' wounds demonstrably line up on a trajectory and track straight back to the sixth floor window.
Kennedy is very clearly seen to suffer a massive exit wound exploding at the right temple consistent only with a shot from behind.
Connally's said the shots came from behind.
Autopsy shows the shots came from behind.
Parkland doctors had no particular problem with the autopsy photos.
Witnesses directly under the sixth floor window firmly said the shots all came from directly overhead.
No unidentified persons were ever seen inside the building by anybody.
Oswald was the only employee inside the building during the shooting to immediately flee and never return.
Oswald just shrugged a hollow, rambling reply when asked on live TV, "Did you shoot the President?"
@aaronz7056 everything you just wasted your time writing has been debunked. You have any evidence of any of that. Everyone knows the Warren commission is a lie. Stop being so naive.
@aaronz7056 just because Oswald left, it doesn't make hom a criminal. It doesn't look good but it doesn't mean that he did it.
Latent palm print? Don't be so gullible. The weapon had been handles by multiple people that worked for different agencies. Get a clue.
thank u, keep posting! jfk and lincoln were my previous incarnations!
There’s a video in your ads
The Grassy Knoll shot was possibly a distraction. Given Emmett Hudson's testimony and the reaction of the 2 men standing with him clearly proves a shot from the knoll but, Fiester's analysis is the most accurate.
That lying clown Fiester ignored and contradicted hard evidence.
I've wondered why no photos or film from the other side of the overpass. Streets lined with folks but like nobody's on the other side of overpass? Add very limited news media. That's strange as well.
I think the streets were lined with people, this was to the overpass most people were further in the streets back there, the route was longer than only that part.
The SS AND the FBI were, and still are, working against the security of the U.S..
"... against all enemies, foreign and DOMESTIC..."!
Wow that is aerie 🫢
"I was a bench warmer for The-Big-Event (JFK assassination)" -E Howard Hunt's last testimonial
Rubbish.
@@aaronz7056 lame response with nothing to back it up
@@concerta56 How about "all credible evidence points at Oswald acting alone?"
@@aaronz7056 what credible evidence?
@@concerta56 Oswald owned the rifle.
Oswald smuggled the rifle.
Oswald's latent print was on the rifle.
Oswald lied to police about his whereabouts during the shooting.
Oswald had every bullet and fragment ever found matched to his rifle.
Oswald was a perfectly plausible match to the shooter seen in the window.
Oswald was in a building where no unidentified persons were ever seen by anybody.
Oswald scored 18 out of 20 in rapid fire at targets 200 yards away as per his Marines scorebook.
Kennedy was a slow-moving target a maximum of 88 yards away.
Victims' reactions in Zapruder's film clearly demonstrate 3 shots over 8-9 seconds with several seconds between each.
Victims' reactions in Zapruder's film clearly demonstrate they are hit by the same bullet, and ergo, from behind.
Within 1-2 frames of Kennedy being hit, Connally's lapel pops out, his hat flips up, his shoulder is driven down, and his expression violently contorts between frames from the blow and his lung collapsing, all demonstrating they are hit by the same bullet, and ergo from behind.
Connally was demonstrably seated lower, inboard and turned sharply to his right.
The victims' wounds demonstrably line up on a trajectory and track straight back to the sixth floor window.
View of the entry wound on Connally's back would demonstrably have been blocked by Kennedy's body, ergo the same bullet has to have gone through both of them, and ergo, from behind.
Bullet recovered from the stretcher is badly crushed at the nose and flattened down one side.
That condition is consistent with going through Kennedy without hitting bone, slowing and tumbling on leaving him, then broadsiding its way through Connally's ribs, as medical and forensic evidence clearly demonstrate.
Kennedy is very clearly seen in Zapruder's film to suffer a massive exit wound exploding at the right temple consistent only with a shot from behind.
Connally's said the shots came from behind.
Autopsy shows the shots came from behind.
Parkland doctors examined the autopsy photos on NOVA in 1988 and had no particular problem with them.
Witnesses directly under the sixth floor window firmly said the shots all came from directly overhead.
Those witnesses had a demonstrably clear view behind the knoll fence and would plainly have seen any gunman there.
Zapruder's secretary was only yards away from the fence and heard and saw nobody there.
It's utterly implausible anybody would ever assume they would frame this on a lone shooter while firing from multiple directions with different guns and bullets.
Oswald was the only employee inside the building during the shooting to immediately flee the plaza, never returning.
Oswald took evasive action by cab to sneak back to his rooming house.
Oswald ignored his cab driver when he asked about the commotion in the streets.
Oswald ignored his landlady when she spoke to him.
There is no evidence Oswald was ever in contact with any "co-conspirators" from the time he arrived at the Paine house Nov. 21 until his death Nov. 24.
Oswald was ID'd by nearly a dozen witnesses as shooting Officer Tippit and fleeing.
Oswald owned and was in possession of the revolver the shells were matched to.
Oswald was plainly seen trying to hide from passing police in a storefront.
Oswald was plainly seen ducking into a theater to dodge more passing police.
Oswald discarded his jacket, complete with fibres consistent with his shirt, between the crime scene and the theater.
Oswald was caught red-handed trying to shoot a second cop in the theater.
Oswald fought police so violently 3 officers were injured just disarming him.
Oswald's actions are consistent with a guy attempting suicide-by-cop.
Oswald observed, "Well, they say it only takes a minute to die" after asking about the penalty for cop-killing.
Oswald refused to cooperate with any investigator.
Oswald acted so smug he even convinced his own brother he was guilty.
Oswald slept like a baby in his cell.
Oswald turned down help offered by H. Louis Nichols, President of the Dallas Bar Association.
Oswald was only interested in a lawyer he'd never met living in another state who specialized in left-wing causes.
Oswald never attempted to blow any conspiracy sacrificing him to any cop, any member of his family, to Nichols, or to a live TV audience of millions.
Oswald just shrugged a hollow, rambling reply when asked on live TV, "Did you shoot the President?"
Jackie was beautiful.... and brave to climb out of that limo to collect those fragments :(
Now you wander why the democrats are the way they are it’s because they have showed how they handle things
LBJ had a hand in the planning too. He was vicious and angry he had lost to Kennedy too.
@@suebarrett6670 We look forward to you now presenting your ironclad evidence, of course.
@@aaronz7056 😆🤣🤣
@@nicknewman7848 In that case we look forward to YOU now presenting ironclad evidence, yes?
Oswald couldn't have been framed because no one could have known in advance that he wouldn't have an alibi. The police didn't frame Oswald. He framed himself.
I have watched the slow motion video many times under a magnifying glass and it is my belief that the head shot was from the right where the picket fence is the bullet entering Jfks right temple exiting through the back of his head blowing away his back skull and brain matter.
If you've watched a slow motion version of the Zapruder film, then you must've seen the moment when he gets hit in the head and his head initially moves forward before recoiling. Not shot from the front.
For every second of the Zapruder film, there are 6 frames missing, because the CIA intercepted it while it was in mail transit over the weekend, end edited it down from 24 frames per second (in the original) and printed a copy that appeared to have been shot at 18 frames per second. And there's an ink blot somewhere to cover up some blood on his head.
@@bobholtzmann silly CIA, they left the head shot in.🤣🤣
@@franclin0 They did succeed in editing out the head fragment flying in the air.
@bobholtzmann dude, come on. The film was used in a court of law trying to prove a conspiracy. What are you saying, they used a tampered copy? They also made 3 copies the day of the assassination. Bootlegs started circulating very quickly. Which one was tampered with? Why was the film tampered with and not destroyed? Why was the film tampered with but not confiscated like Beverly Oliver and Gordon Arnold claim their films were? Why wasn't the Nix film tampered with? Why wasn't the Muchmore film tampered with???
Documentaries about ASSASSINATIONS don't need PTSD trigger alert warnings!
I was in 3rd grade in South Texas. Our teacher, Mrs. Cross came back into the classroom, crying. She told us we were all going home early at 2pm. For a little boy, I was confused but when told by my mother what happened, I still didn't understand why anyone would want to shoot anyone who hadn't screwed with them in the first place.
You answered it by questioning it... Who was keneddy screwing with.. cia was screwed fbi was screwed mob as
screwed and the military industrial complex got screwed by Kennedy. They were all corrupt... Also why did a night club owner with heavy mob ties just all the sudden get taken over by a sudden wash of becoming the righteous hand that had to make things right and kill the man who killed the president
I was a third grader in the Texas Panhandle near Amarillo. We were actually discussing the president visiting our state when the principal made the announcement the president was killed. We were sent home early and I watched everything on tv all weekend including Oswald getting shot and him saying he was just a patsy. Never forgot that.
The zapruder film was altered and Lee Harvey Oswald never fired a single shot that day
This is the most ridiculous sentence on this thread. ALL the evidence points to Oswald's guilt: his rifle, 3 cartridges from his rifle, the bullet and bullet fragments were proven to be from his rifle. He was the ONLY employee from the TSBD to flee the scene. Innocent people don't flee! Guilty beyond doubt! Case Closed!!
😂😂😂. Oswald was a patsy. Everyone knows that
@@debbies8468 NO, her did it.
@@kencampanile548 agree
@@mangojerry2330 that’s fair to believe. We’ll all know the truth soon.
Kennedy should had been in a closed limo that would have been bullet proof
It was a political move by Kennedy himself. He wanted to be seen by the crowd because he was trying to win support for the 64 election in a very red state. There's no point in having a motorcade if you can't be seen.
Nixon rode in that type if car. 🤨
He wanted people to see him
Yes but he likes see the people who he served 🙄 but yes he needed more protection
Nixonand LBJ assassin Kennedy
Yes they didn’t want Franklin to testify
Castro when he was young sure looked like the current pm of Canada
i would like to know what was their initial buy-in
Watch the interview with James File. Its on here, might blow your mind. No pun intended.
Files was a Convenient Scapegoat by Choice. I suspect strongly that the CIA, who led the Coalition to murder JFK,, put him up to his Fraud. The Intel Agencies literally Control the Media worldwide and Files was Made into a Mini-Celebrity obviously with the Blessing of the Elites and Intel Agencies to further Muddy the Waters. The Actual Assassins hired by the CIA were most likely Murdered themselves shortly after the assassination. These were Elites who ordered the Hit and Loose Ends are Rarely Allowed. When dealing with these Evil Agencies you always have to consider that they stack Multiple Layers of Deception so that if you figure out one Psyop then the Layer underneath will keep you from learning the Truth. And if that one doesn't fool you, the next Layer of Lies will. They've been doing this a long time and their good at it. Personal experice here..
No; his story's been debunked. The two shell casings (one dented by his bite) later unearthed behind the grassy knoll fence were indeed from Remington .22 spent ammo.
But the manufacurer's factory identification markings on the base of the shells indicated the bullets were from a stock grouping made after 1963.
They were probably planted by Files himself.
I watched it yesterday..so many facts checked out. Times and people.
@@elizaleroux9173 Ge's the P.T. Barnum of JFK assassin wannabes.
He blew it with the bullets at the fence, though.
@@James-ll3jb did they find the bullet casing on the fence?
Thanks tells the true story
given the drivel of comments here I thank you whole heartedly for your comment.
My Mom’s dad never liked the Kennedy’s. He was glad those days. The first time I watched this was in high school. I knew right off why they both got killed. I just didn’t know for a while who was all in on it. It’s still mind boggling today..
*WechT
I was 7yrs old then and remember where I was,funny hw bush forgot.
I walked the Plaza in 1999, 2006, and another year in between those dates...strange, but as a deer hunter from the Ozarks, I selected a location inside the 26 degree cone as a possible shooting position about 20 years ago due to witness accounts of a projectile penetrating the windshield from the front. However I discounted it since there were 3 men standing on the triple overpass about 50 yards to the left, and none of them heard a shot to their right, but they did say they saw smoke come out from under the trees in front of the picket fence. I must say it looked like smoke but was most likely dust from the leaves on the tree as the shockwave of the blast of gasses that were expelled from the barrel of the rifle when fired. Modern rifles use smokeless powder today and since the late 19th century.
It sounds right that the president needed the mofia help to get elected
Ridiculous theory 🙄
I was 7months old when he died
She didn't try to get a piece of skull off the car, she herself said she did not remember the moment, every who has experienced something traumatic knows that every sense of conciousness leaves you, and you go into full survival mode, she probably saw his throat being shot, wondering at first what happened to her Husband, then she heard another shot, and tried Jumping out of the way of Danger, she probably tried to cover his wounds somewhat on the way to the hospital, but in no freaking way in hell did she try to collect a piece of skull in a shocked Panic moment, her survival instincts were obviously kicking in, and that has nothing to do with cowardness, it is compeltely natural.
In no way, when he was shot, she instantly thought "Oh i have to collect the piece of skull!!!" which in that quick second probably didn't even registrate with her due to shock.
Both you guys commenting bout Mrs Kennedy trying to self preserve herself is pure horsecrap..she didn't have any memories of even crawling on the back of the car but when she arrived at parkland she handed the head nurse that part of the skull she retrieved from the trunk of the limousine and said will this help and also clint hill also testified and has said in interviews he watched her pick up a peice of jfks skull off the trunk. People who believe otherwise are conspiracy theory nutjobs..
She definitely grabbed a piece of his skull
@@ryanra44She definitely did. It was in her hand at Parkland, she gave it to a doctor.
Kimberly-cx9uv You people are just projecting your fantasies onto Jackie. You don't know what thoughts she might have had, either rational or irrational in nature.
A bolt rifle could not be fired as close as the first two shots.
Exactly and that was the testimony of 3 SS agents plus other witnesses.
Victims' reactions in Zapruder's film clearly demonstrate 3 shots over 8-9 seconds with several seconds between each shot.
Who was the director of the cia when it happened? George Bush Sr. 🤔. Still wanna play stupid?! 😂
When the assassination happened? John McCone
Bush didn't become director of the CIA until 1976.
Bush wasn't even in local government at the time let alone the CIA. The fact you don't this simple fact is absurd.
@@rawbacon so is your vocabulary…🤨 I said Sr. Not jr, 😎
@@bikerider4326 He wasn't yet in Government, the fact you still don't know this is Appalling.
What about secret service, to stay away, from the car. That's, strange.
If Oswald was going to assassinate JFK, ask yourself why he didn't shoot JFK right between the eyes in a Straight On Shot as the Limo was approaching Oswald while it was on Houston Street before it turned onto Elm.. Here's your Answer.. The actual Team of Assassins needed the Limo to turn onto Houston to enter a Virtual Kill Box where it could not Turn either way and could ouly move ether Forward or Backward without escaper from Multiple Teams of Assassins. Had the Assassins started shooting on Houston Street the Limo could have gone Forward, Backward or Turned Right onto Elm and Escaped the assassination! Also, had the Secret Service, which was Complicit in the murder, NOT tried to evade the assassination at that point, it would have been glaringly obvious and they would have certianly been Prosecuted also. This is only one of the Key Points of this murder along with much evidence that the government gathered itself that convicts.. the government..
Would you do that with all the eyes of the SS facing you? This wasn't a suicide mission for him, he was trying to escape. If he had fired when they were facing him, no doubt the building would've been sealed instantly amd he would've gotten caught in minutes.
@@franclin0Oswald never fired a shot. He was a patsy.
@jimmyc1518 the conspiracy got super lucky that Oswald was completely out of sight at the time of the shooting, didn't they?
@franclin0 If you don’t dig too deep, the story as presented to us appears to be rational and somewhat plausible. In reality, the thesis of Oswald as the lone assassin is a well thought out and long planned cover story that was designed to create plausible deniability for those involved. The assassination was the most significant event in world history and the perpetrators prepared accordingly. In the end, Oswald was, just as he had told us, a patsy.
@@jimmyc1518 a patsy for who? Did he ever say?
I was in my 8th grade typing class when we got the news about President Kennedy being shot. The principal came over the intercom with the announcement. It was 8 days before my 14th birthday.
I HEARD THAT SOMETHING HAPPENED TO THOSE WITNESSES WHO EVER THEY WERE..AND SEEN VIDEOS OF WERE THEY WHERE CLOSE TO THE MOTER. CADE..
Yes it was 100 of these eye witnesses and they probably had all seen something significant. Because within that year they had all died from one thing or another, not of natural Causes. well, maybe two of Cancer.
The human memory is notoriously fickle, especially when it comes to remembering details. Years of research has found that our brains tend to fill in the missing gaps with fiction or other memories when we cannot remember the specifics.
That's somewhat true. However there are several non conspiracy books in Print like "Reclaiming History" that have ALL the Facts.
Horrible sound.
Even 'if' the SS, CIA and FBI weren't involved Initially, it was the cover up that always gets them
And how, exactly, do you safely approach the Secret Service, the CIA, and the FBI, and persuade them all to obey illegal orders, assist a bloody coup, and bend over backwards making themselves all eternally loyal accessories to murder and treason?
And you safely approach the Secret Service, the CIA and the FBI (as well as the police, military personnel, whole commissions, etc.), and persuade them all to trust each other implicitly, obey illegal orders and bend over backwards making themselves all eternally loyal accessories to murder and treason HOW, exactly...?
I was going to try to watch this, but it quickly revealed that it is just another asinine conspiracy theory production.
@@isabellindlind That is far too limited. It is about much more than that, including that people just like thinking that they are onto something that others don't have the ability to see. It makes them feel superior and clever. There are many more factors, as well.
@@isabellindlind I know it was a quote. It isn't a good one. Lots of CT thinking has nothing to do with what the quote asserts.
I was in Houston Texas when l heard of it over the radio. I was downtown about 6 blocks from Main street. I immediately closed the parking lot that l was working at and l started walking towards Main street. l remember seeing some girls crying and walking towards me.
My brother was in the Army and at Fort Polk in Lousiana. He said his company was taken in from the fields and everything there was big time status.
✌️✌️✌️I'll try and come back to watch your presentation... I saw it the event, the Murder, of JFK as it unfolded...in a fifth grade classroom of a Catholic School in Dallas Texas... A special day for Catholics. they rolled TVs into the classroom... we all watched with pride... but then... time stopped... we started screaming and pointing at the TV... Shouting, and Asking our teachers why police did not chase them. All of us kids saw two men clothed in what today we would call a bodysuit... Head to toe black ...both carrying rifles... 😮 Running across highway 35 on train tracks into a 5 story building in which I discovered years later as an adult... that the 3rd floor ..well, there was no 3rd floor...for public.✌️🤠🐒 Oswald is innocent of that he was eating lunch when the event took place.. you can research the timeline yourself
The assassination was not broadcast on live TV. The Zapruder film was not seen by the public until 1976. Your memory is faulty.
Not possible. The assassination was not televised. CBS was the 1st to break thru (As The World Turns) with an audio of Walter Cronkite. It took several minutes for TV tubes to warm up before they went live with video. This event changed the TV studios forever as moving forward they always had the tubes up and running. There were no TV cameras in Dealey Plaza or in the motorcade. The Zapruder Film was not seen by the public for many many years later.
Liar Liar pants on fire.🙃
Dave Powers heard the gun shots and Kenny O'Donnell did to , they saw the shots come from the grassy knoll.
Witnesses directly under the sixth floor window firmly said the shots all came from directly overhead, they had a clear view behind the knoll fence and would plainly have seen any gunman there.
@@aaronz7056oh right, the commission called everyone to testify. Hammerhead
@@AMC2283 Your childish insult in noted and I repeat what I just said. In addition:
Every bullet and fragment ever found were matched to Oswald's rifle.
Victims' reactions in Zapruder's film, 1-2 frames apart, demonstrate they are hit by the same bullet, and ergo from behind.
Kennedy is seen in the film to suffer a massive exit wound at the temple consistent only with a shot from behind.
Connally's said the shots came from behind.
Autopsy shows the shots came from behind.
Parkland doctors examined the autopsy photos on NOVA in 1988 and had no particular problem with them.
It's vastly implausible anybody would ever assume they would frame this on a lone shooter while firing from multiple directions.
@@aaronz7056 "Childish insult"? That's ripe coming from you, mate. You're the King of obstinate belligerence. If anything the Z film does not prove they were hit by the same bullet, Aaron. Sorry. the man hit by a bullet said he was in the process of turning back round when he was struck. The visual evidence strongly suggests the 'throat reaction bullet' did not hit JC.. unless he casually turned round after he was hit and then turned back again before lying down. Last time we spoke you suggested he was describing turning around behind the sign where we couldn't see him on film. That doesn't work either because he's still trying to look over his shoulder and turn around after Kennedy is hit in the throat. You avoided explaining that one. That you (detailed as you are) are selectively blind to the unscientific approach to the crux of the whole thing and this particular flaw in Specters theory (which he himself admitted decades later was only speculation and not fact) kind of ruins your credibility as a lone gunman absolutist. If you can't prove Arlen's crappy theory you can't prove single shooter and all your dissertations are a waste of time. Cheers, mate 🤣
That woman doesn't know. That last shot came from the knoll. Please❗❗❗
You were there and saw the whole thing huh?
Wrong.
All credible ballistic, medical, forensic, film and eyewitness evidence clearly demonstrate the shots all came from the sixth floor window, and from Oswald's rifle.
Problem with that picture is JFK was where sitting where you have Jackie and vice versa.....get a grip
That street was set up by the book building all the way down to the under pass was set up it was not like the other streets were you had a lot of people that by the time it got to and the end of the street it was completely different from the other streets where everything happened so fast and not many were their were you can get away and the only thing was that lee harvey oswald was I
in a movie theater to see a movie so he would not have to go back to work at the book building for the afternoon but go home for dinner
In the movie theater that would keep him their for a long time and be able to go home to have his dinner and not have to go to work until Monday morning to do his job at the book building
Watch JFK: The Smoking Gun!
How about the storm drain the motorcycle cop looked at?
... and found absolutely nothing in...
Office of naval intelligence
Despite my beliefs that Oswald did not act alone.. 187 feet is absolutely nothing when it comes to shooting a rifle with a scope on it.. most people sight their scope in at 333 feet and you don’t even start getting into difficult shooting until about 2500 foot down range and even then it takes minor skill and adjustment to even do that.. stop acting like the distance was anything at all worth noting and start pointing out the time it takes in between shots is more worth looking at.
Oswald also had plenty of time between shots, though. He had about 8.4 seconds between the first shot and the third.
The kid was not a good marksman per his history with peer rifle club. He was not "an assassin" he was a disturbed young white male - - classic profile for a school or other shooter.
@9Ballr Oswald did not have that much time. Closer to 6 seconds. One shot missed entirely. And this is all presuming Oswald was a shooter and the only one.
@@harveycan5820 No, he had closer to 8.4 seconds between the first shot and the third shot. We can calculate that using the Zapruder film, which runs at 18.3 frames per second. We know the second shot occurred right around frame 223. A conservative estimate would put the first shot around frame 155 (it may very well have been before that, as it may not even be on the Zapruder film, which first shows the limo in frame 133). The second shot is at frame 223. That's 68 frames between the first and second shot, at 18.3 frames per second, which would be about 3.75 seconds between the first and second shot. The third shot occurs at frame 313, which means there are 90 frames between the second and third shots. At 18.3 frames per second, that's 4.9 seconds between the second and third shots. 3.75 + 4.9 = 8.65 seconds between the first and third shots.
@@harveycan5820 Oswald was adept at hitting bullseyes shooting rapid-fire at 200 yards and 300 yards, per his performance on his Marine Corps shooting tests. The distance to the fatal head shot was about 88 yards.
Look for JFK 104 Great movie/documentary !!!!
This was a very well done documentary. With that being said, it was totally inappropriate to include the glowing commentary on President Obama at the end of the film!!!!! I have lived through Presidents from Eisenhower to Biden and Obama by far was the worst in my lifetime!!!!!! Next time the producers should just stick to the subject at hand rather than shilling!!!!!
Glad i read this first so i dont have to continue watching this.
Agreed, Obama is an Arab Traitor. His middle name is Hussein. He and his wife are worth 70 million dollars and own 4 mansions in various houses of the US, one of which is in Hawaii. Obama spent 14 years in government service. So where did all that $$$ come from? Book deals and speaking engagements?
Presidential historians seem to disagree with you.
@@ericwiliiams9540 Democrat historians who aren't objective and lack integrity!!!!!
Yeah, giving people who couldn't afford it healthcare was horrendous😂
21 year-old James Earl Files made the fatal shot from the grassy knoll. He used a Remington Fireball with a scope.
Agreed. Except his real name is James Sutton. Born 1942
@@americanwoman6246 right on
@@PrstgeWrldWde he only says his real name once, it's towards the end of that documentary, any way... Thanks for the comment.
Correct the doco I shot JFK by Jimmy Files has been re-released 2 days ago it goes for almost 3 hrs.ua-cam.com/video/44x5I-kP48o/v-deo.htmlsi=8E-1mHHZfy4cVmHy
I watched that interview with him aswell. It really doesn't matter who did the shooting. Where did the orders come from. The CIA, The MOB,The FBI. A lone wolf. That we will never know.
lol, the hope with obozo faded rather quickly, I would imagine.
The conspiracy theory that won't die.
Because the amount of evidence to the contrary sold to us in the Warren Report! This country lost WAY MORE than JFK that day and now we are reaping the Fallout and it's SICKENING!!
I think with Trumps attempt, it has shown that there is indeed something fishy, especially today with people on medias where they can easily tell their side of the story, such as twitter, youtube, 4k Videos, you can't easily cover up shit, there definitely was something internally going on when Trump was shot
Because it's got legs!
@@harveycan5820 Broken legs.
I think it's wronmg to think that LBJ did not want the Warren Commission.
It came from under the over pass..There was a bullet hole in the windshield !
The hole was created from a remaining fragmented bullet that hit Kennedy from behind because parts of that bullet were found on the floor board of the limousine..it wasn't a through and through hole..do some more research its in the the Warren commission report..bet you didn't know that did you.
Stephen, there's a bullet hole in your windshield and a draft between your ears.
no... the secret service vehicle ahead of him... they secret service officer pulled out a rifle and when the car accelerated he accidently pulled trigger. but yes it came from that direction. ive heard there was a hole in windshield aswell
@@robzajac5400There was not SS vehicle ahead of JFK car. They were behind, but that theory has been debunked.
@@robzajac5400 Story is flatly contradicted by eyewitness, film, photo, ballistic and medical evidence, and Agent Hickey successfully sued the publishers of the crackpot book accusing him.
Only damage to the windshield, still in the National Archives, is a bad crack caused by a bullet fragment that also damaged the chrome plating... from the inside.