I was a senior in high school on November 22,1963. I stayed home from school that day. My mother came home from work early crying. She immediately turned the television on and I heard the official announcement from Walter Cronkite. When he said the President was dead I was numb.
I would have thought that LHO was the type of person that would gleefully admit to killing Kennedy, And not deny shooting anyone ? Just a passing thought
@@johnwilliams-ih3pv If Oswald wanted to claim he shot President Kennedy,he would have and Not kept denying it. What you stated is quite a realistic,logical statement.I agree with it.
@ James Malcom Watch U.S.S. Liberty on Real News Network. Unarmed U.S. Spy ship attacked in 1967. 34 U.S. dead & 171 wounded. It's like part 2. Cover up continues by both parties & govt. What would JFK do? Iran/Contra/ Israel. The Finders/ Franklin & Epstein scandals from 70 ' s till now. Watch Nick Bryant show anout Franklin Savings & Loan & sex w/ kids. Epstein is the tip of iceberg. All protected by govt.
A lot of people think that Oswald's view of the limo could not have been blocked by the leaves on the trees because it was November. While most trees shed their leaves in the fall and are bare during the Winter months, those trees were Texas Live Oak. Texas Live Oak trees shed their leaves in the Spring, not the fall. Therefore, his view was somewhat blocked for a few seconds anyway.
Mr. ED! (An unexpected moment of levity). Many Americans have researched this to death for 60 years or so -- and found out things are never what they appear to be.
I loved watching Mr Ed!! A horse is a horse of course of course And no one can talk to a horse of course. That is of course unless the horse Is the famous Mister Ed! Go right to the source and ask the horse. He'll give you the answer that you'll endorse He's always on a steady course. Talk to Mister Ed! People yakkity-yak a streak And waste your time of day, but Mister Ed will never speak Unless he has something to say! A horse is a horse of course of course And this one'll talk 'til his voice is hoarse. You've never heard of a talking horse? Well, listen to this... 🐎 🗨 🗯 💭 🗨 💬 🐴 💬 "I am Mister Ed!
@@brendonwilhelmi_7251 HAHAHAHAHAHA!!! 🎶 of COURSE, of COURSE!😆 I still know others, to this day, who sing along!! Some great belly laugh memories on that show (driving the truck and Ed puts out left arm to signal the turn!!!) BWAHahahah. The 1st time we saw it, we hit the floor laughing our arses off!! Ed shorts are on my playlist (remember when Ed hit the pitched ball... and sliiiiiiiding into home base !)
@@DaveSCameron Please back up your false claims of “ There’s stuff here that never happened *” I am sure you are full of hot air and probably have never read any of the Warren Commission Report but rather you are simply parroting other people’s words!!!
Well, I wouldn't say that. After 60 years of additional research and document releases, it's a glaring certainty at least that the Warren theory was as bogus as it gets.
@@richardhartley4102 Reporter question: "Did you shoot the President?" Oswald answer: “No, they've taken me in because of the fact that I lived in the Soviet Union...I'm just a patsy!" It is clear from the context that Oswald is saying that the Dallas authorities are blaming him for the assassination simply because of the fact that he defected to the Soviet Union, and he was a convenient person for them to accuse.
He probably was a patsy. Was also probably directly involved in the assassination. Idk about anyone else but if I was accused of killing the president I would be livid, emphatic, and very direct. When he's asked by the reporter he doesn't go to any length whatsoever to give an unambiguous response, he says "I haven't been charged with that yet...". Not the response of an innocent person
Dan Rather really needs to finally come clean about his reporting from November 1963. “His head went FORWARD with considerable violence!” His meteoric rise from cub reporter to national prime time anchor is amazing. I wonder why the ARRB didn’t examine him under oath in the 1990s to try to better understand how he reported the exact opposite of what he purportedly saw on the original Zapruder film.
He Would Be.. & totally is Guilty Of. Capital Crimes.. when convicted would be executed.. so don’texpect him to confess to covering up JFKs death.. But he did & is..Whenever he’s asked he said the same thing there is no evidence whatsoever to dispute the Warren commission findings he said it time and time again says all the conspiracy theories are wrong and he can prove it and every time he does he just lays his ass off he’s a scumbag
@@ronniebishop2496 at least… what is it. Mokinbird.. bet yer ass they did it.. bunch of fck wads. Don’t you think??? ever. get it??? me either I get NEWSDAY…. I crack myself up… all fkn day..
@@randyharris3175 Wow. So you fell for the suggestion? Watch it again. That is not the only thing Dan Rather has lied about, either. He was not proven right at all.
@@wtmerit6129 I get that, but watch it again and tell what what way he fell. Can you do that instead of puking Dan Rather bull crap? Physics are not on your side on this one. It is obvious that when the shot went through his throat, he leaned forward slightly, but when the shot came from the front, he fell back and to the left. Had he been shot from behind, all the blood and brains would have exploded in front of him. The fact everything blew out behind means the shot came from the front. Here is how to remember it, entry wound small, exit wound big. Were the sheep alive and moving?
"I told our local librarian that the Warren Report should be placed in the fiction section.": Then you told a really stupid joke without even understanding why you said it.
It's never been proven that her death had anything to do with the JFK assassination, and it has also never been proven that she had any special insight into the assassination.
@Wilt Chamberlain is the GOAT But where's the proof that she actually had anything? Also I think you may have the time frame wrong. My recollection is that she claimed that she would break the case wide open soon after she interviewed Jack Ruby in March, 1964, but her death wasn't until November, 1965, so if I'm correct I don't think most people would say "suddenly." She also ran a story in September, 1965 in which she said, "This story isn't going to die as long as there's a real reporter alive---and there are a lot of them." Also, at the time of her death she was working on a book which was to be titled "Murder One." In the publisher's advance advertisement for the book it was said that it was to be a study of the trials she had covered, including those of Sam Sheppardl, Wayne Lonegan, Dr. Bernard Finch, and Bruno Hauptman, but no mention of Jack Ruby. Even if the book was planned to include her coverage of the Ruby trial and it simply wasn't mentioned in the advertisement, it would be curious that she would relegate a major revelation about the JFK assassination to a book which discussed other trials as well. She also, starting long before she died, published quite a few articles in which she merely repeated conspiracy factoids given to her by Mark Lane.
@Wilt Chamberlain is the GOAT "Ruby may have told her for sure who was behind it." Uh-huh. I'm guessing you've never read the majority of Jack Ruby's testimony, correct? If you have, you should be able to tell us all here precisely why he begged Earl Warren to take him to Washington, and exactly who the sinister forces were who were supposedly preventing him from telling the truth in Dallas.
@@josephgeorge7385 "She was killed because she interviewed Jack Ruby." Really now? She interviewed Jack Ruby in March, 1964. She died in November, 1965. Why did "they" wait 20 months to kill her? Why did "they" give her 20 months to blab everything she knew to everyone she knew? Or maybe she didn't have any "bombshell" about the assassination after all, and only mistakenly thought she did?
Jesse Curry lied. Oswald asked on film for a lawyer. He was interrogated for hours without being permitted an attorney. The notes of the interrogation were destroyed. Humm what is going on?
Oswald wanted a specific lawyer from NY, John Abt: but Abt wanted nothing to do with him. The president of the Dallas County Bar Association, H. Louis Nichols went to see him and Oswald told him he wanted Abt or a lawyer from the American Civil Liberties Union and didn’t need any help from the bar association to find an attorney. It should also be of interest to know that John Abt spent most of his career as chief counsel to the Communist Party USA.
the biggest calamity this country has ever seen .. explain to me how a CIA director who gets fired by the victim gets to be on the warren commission ? Ill Wait .... Ive waited this long
It was Lyndon Johnson who picked Earl Warren and either he or Warren picked Allen Dulles I'm guessing. Dulles was such a turd. By the way, it's a very good chance Roscoe White was the Knoll shooter.
@@josephgeorge7385 I don't recall any solid evidence ever being produced that Dulles hated Kennedy, such as a verbatim quote from a reliable source that Dulles said specifically that he hated Kennedy. What is your source for this claim?
In March 1965, Jack Ruby stated in a news conference: "Everything pertaining to what's happening has never come to the surface. The world will never know the true facts of what occurred, my motives. The people who had so much to gain, and had such an ulterior motive for putting me in the position I'm in, will never let the true facts come above board to the world." The reporter asked, "Are these people in very high positions Jack"". "Yes", Ruby responded. That's from the horse's mouth - so no doubt, Mr. Ed would approve! Now if only the mystery of Jack Ruby's mother's teeth in the Warren Report could be unpacked....
It’s hard to believe you have people still to this day claiming Lee Harvey Oswald shot the cop Lee Harvey Oswald shot the President Lee Harvey Oswald Didn’t shoot anyone ,thank you for your comment at least someone Paid attention excellent quote on Jack Ruby too but He said President Johnson’s at the top of his list.. not in so many words .. but yeah he did
And that’s funny too they took a study the Warren commission that is of Jack Ruby’s mothers teeth now even if Jack Ruby had BITTEN Lee Harvey Oswald to death.. His mothers teeth prints would have nothing to do with it and be of no value so you tell me why they did shit like that and Warren report geez maybe they didn’t want the truth do you think you made some really good points thank you
Why didn't Ruby ever reveal any of the details about the "true facts" and the "people in very high positions"??? He was arrested, tried for murder, convicted, and sentenced to death, but never revealed any of the deep, dark "facts" through any of that, and continued to not reveal any of it, through his death, January 3rd, 1967. It is a bit puzzling, isn't it, that he knew so much, but never revealed any of it? It is almost like he was talking out of his ass.
When American citizens were more trusting....had no idea they were being duped...and by the time this aired those who felt they were had seen or heard of too many strange deaths. Time always tells... God don't like ugly or evil...
The ugly irony is that people were duped by CT people like Mark Lane (Rush to judgement) and Jim Garrison (on the trail of the assassins), who lied thru their teeth to fabricate a conspiracy.
@@curbozerboomer1773can you control all the bugs in your garden on an individual basis? Get to decide which ones kill each other? Being a creator doesn't mean you control your creation, especially if you allow them free will.
Of course. Walter Cronkite and Dan Rather were puppets of the Warren Commission. Now Dorothy Kilgallen , a CBS employee who's position was a panelist on 'What's My Line' had a talk with Jack Ruby sometime after the assassination. She was going to 'blow the case wide open.' Before she could she died of an 'apparent suicide.' due to excess consumption of barbituates. Back at that time , senator Prescott Bush was on the board of directors of CBS. CBS conducted their own investigation into the assassination---God only knows why. So, connect the dots.
@rick4electric: What do you have when you misstate the case so you can get a conspiracy? Things that aren't right: 1) the number 100 2) your math 3) your logic..
What do you have when you have 100 co-conspirators planted all over town, each fully confident they can successfully get their hands on and undetectably alter every film of the assassination, successfully falsify all the medical and ballistics evidence, and succeed in outfoxing the entire legitimate law enforcement community every step of the way, each relying on luck, split-second timing, and praying to God that no random element, unpredictable witness, unanticipated complication or co-conspirator cracks or screws up, co-conspirators now obliged to spend the rest of their lives threatening and intimidating countless witnesses to never come forward and admit they were in danger if they didn't lie their asses off to the nation for 58 years? A flippin' MIRACLE.
Russian is an extremely hard language to learn, but even harder to learn to speak and pronounce if you’re a native English speaker. The consonant clusters and unique vowels can’t be heard by many people since their ears aren’t attenuated to those sounds. Marina said she thought he was a native speaker when she met him in Belorussia. That is very odd. It means he received very professional language immersion training. Where would he have obtained that? We have no record of him attending DLI. USMC cohorts of his said he was studying Russian and reading books in Russian. That wouldn’t explain his pronunciation and conversational skills.
@@LRRPFco52 I recommend that you read "Harvey and Lee" by John Armstrong and watch some of his videos. (btw, Harvey and Lee pdf is available, free online.)
Where and how he learned Russian has absolutely nothing to do with the fact he took a rifle to work, shot the president and then fled the scene. Nothing.
@@kevinjones8929 You are entitled to your own opinion and beliefs. However, that being said, after looking at all the known evidence, you may be a person that just cannot handle the truth or..... you cannot be awakened because you are pretending to be asleep.
This is astonishing. Raises issues with the report about to drop live then Boom! Warren gives these answers and goodnight. It comes across as Warren PR to a viewer today.
To go against the prestige of the US government at the height of the Cold War would have been unconscionable. Since all these journalists loved JFK, they probably preferred the lone nutjob theory anyway. Also, what real proof did they have to the contrary? They would have been quite happy to report on arrests, trials and convictions of the conspirators should that have happened.
The warren report , a report that had the story all sorted before they started . After all these years that have past since the report , many people have researched almost everything about the three Murders that weekend in Dallas , interviewed all the people who came forward that day and this is what makes the WC floored , for them if they the witnesses didn’t fit there narrative of the lone nut they didn’t get a voice that day , the job of the WC was to collect only the evidence that would pin the assassination on LHO , the Dallas police dept played there part , fixers planted evidence and in the minutes following that final fatal shot , the cover up and the set up of LHO the patsy was in full swing , once Oswald was eliminated by Jack Ruby (not to save Jackie from a trial , but on the orders of his pay chiefs the Mafia) the investigation of the murder of a fellow police officer Stop dead like a stone ( the evidence against Oswald for killing Tippett was poor at best ) 60 years have past and with everything that has come out over these the passing years documents and the like , show the WC for what it is ….
No, it was just what the commission concluded based on its good investigation. The evidence against Oswald is overwhelming, but conspiracy buffs simply ignore it.
Oswald mother is so insightful "A Russian girl any foreign girl, a negro just any human beings, lives and breathe just as I do" All I see is a mother who loves her son and wanted him to be happy.
Gotta love how they chose all the witnesses that went along with the narrative. Not anyone with alternate viewpoints which was a thing from the beginning.
Paranoia. Oswald did this and he was the man who just shrugged a hollow, rambling reply that all but dodges the question when asked on live TV, "Did you shoot the President?"...
@@aaronz7056 there's no way on mother earth that one dude pulled this off. The evidence to the contrary is greater than the tow the line narrative. You're telling me you don't see any inconsistencies at all? Don't be a clown.
This was the first bogus whitewashing of this murder. Note that one of the members, Allen Dulles, was dismissed by Kennedy. ..."On November 29, 1963, President Lyndon Baines Johnson appointed Dulles as one of seven commissioners of the Warren Commission to investigate the assassination of the U.S. President John F. Kennedy. The appointment was later criticized by some historians, who have noted that Kennedy had fired him, and he was therefore unlikely to be impartial in passing the judgments charged to the Warren Commission. In the view of journalist and author Stephen Kinzer, Johnson appointed Dulles primarily so that Dulles could "coach" the Commission on how to interview CIA witnesses and what questions to ask, because Johnson and Dulles were both anxious to ensure that the Commission did not discover Kennedy's secret involvement in the administration's illegal plans to assassinate Castro and other foreign leaders.[41]..."
@QuantumRift.... Not only were both LBJ and Allen Dulles anxious to ensure the Commission didn’t discover the secret plans to assassinate Fidel Castro, but it was more imperative to keep it a secret because Lee Oswald was a participant in a get Castro plot...There were Cuban Contingency Plans in place that would ensure the assassination could remain secret even before the assassination happened...when you have people like William King Harvey running the “Executive Action” program in America - a person who despised Kennedy - the assassination was inevitable
Why would the government keep such incriminating docs - that would be so detrimental to them - in the first place? Or if they existed, why not destroy them long ago?
the government has let all the truth out that it knows and can safely reveal. Anything hidden is not a cover-up of what happened, and has been reviewed.
Think what you will about its overall premise, this remains, due to its assemblage of interviews, the most valuable single production by a 1960s U.S. network regarding JFK's murder. Several people in this broadcast weren't interviewed too often, if at all, thereafter. While others who appear remained talking-head staples for decades and this would be among their first filmed renditions. After Warren Report was issued, all U.S. networks supported its conclusions to the hilt. But at this moment--when the reporters had recently seen the official version, but the public hadn't, and their interviews had already been filmed--CBS allowed itself final flickers of journalism before network objectivity on the subject (and maybe a few others) was extinguished. And Walter's introduction, as if narrating a Movie of the Week trailer, is a classic: "The Wife...The Mother...The Best Friend..."
@@josephgeorge7385 Mark Lane's middle names could have been "Leading Witnesses." Somehow, a guy who was Jim Jones' right hand man, who made no attempt to warn off Leo Ryan from the death trap he was walking into at Jonestown, and who thus has blood all over his hands, doesn't strike me as a man with boundless credibility.
If Oswald actually took a package of curtain rods to work on the morning of 11/22 why were the curtain rods STILL in Ruth Paine's garage ? If Oswald didn't take his rifle to work on the morning of 11/22 then why wasn't it in the blanket in Ruth Paine's garage (where he kept it) when the FBI searched there on the afternoon of the 22nd ?
This is sad that we find out that the newscasters we trusted were involved in making it appear that Oswald was guilty when clearly he wasn't. Example. A witness Howard Brennan saw the shooter on the six floor shoot then took time to observe if he hit his target. But the newscasters said Oswald could have shot then quickly run down the stairs to be found in the lunch room. Since the shooter took time and Oswald was found in a less than a minute and a half, the shooter could not be Oswald. The witnesses who saw the shooter who killed officer Tippet said he fired five times. But the gun Oswald owned had a broken firing pin and could not fire. The cop who said his thumb blocked the hammer of Oswald's gun was wrong. The shells found that had killed Tippet were from an automatic. Oswald had a revolver. Thus Oswald's gun did not kill Tippet. Other witnesses said the shooter had a partner and was not Oswald. The guy who picked Oswald in the line up had several choices. But all but Oswald were dressed in suits and the witness was told that the suspect was just arrested. Officer Curry said Oswald was given all his civil rights. Officer Lewis said Oswald never asked for a lawyer. But film shows Oswald asking for one. Thus the cop lied. Oswald never got an attorney. All the notes of Oswald's interrgation were burned. Why? His thumb print on the rifle was not there the first time they printed it. It was found only after Oswald was dead. The cops originally found a different rifle then the one bought by Oswald. Both Cronkite and Rather report all the shots came from the sixth floor but 80% of the witnesses including 20 plus cops said a shot came from the grassy knoll. Oswald was set up. Cronkite said nine people said Oswald was at the scene of the death of Tippet. That info was flat false.. Mrs Markham gave several different reports. Anther witness who was the closest who saw the shooting said it was not Oswald. She has disappeared, the package that Cronkite said was the rifle could not have been. More fake news. Etc etc, Cronkite and Rather parroted the Warren Report, There now is a mountain of evidence which proves Oswald was not the shooter but there were multiple shooters.
You sound like the scriptwriter for Oliver Stone. Like you, he created his own fantasy of what happened. It was the unanimous testimony of expert witnesses before the Warren Commission that the spent cartridge cases were fired from the revolver in Oswald's possession to the exclusion of all other weapons.
You forgot to mention the part about gun smoke being seen near fence on the grassy knoll. There was also a man who was stopped by a cop behind the fence with a secret service badge and dirty fingernails who for some reason was standing behind the fence and then told the cop to clear the area. The secret service said there was no such man that worked for them in the area that day. So who was this man and what was he doing ? Witnesses also saw this man standing near the fence prior to the shooting just hanging around.
@@samgambino9695 Saying it was clearly "gun smoke" is not accurate. Two of the witnesses said they thought it was exhaust fumes, as from a car or motorcycle. Interestingly, when Oliver Stone was making his full of lies movie about the assassination, a number of rifles were trotted out, none of which emitted any smoke (well maintained modern rifles don't produce smoke). The smoke had to be generated using special effects.
@@robertromero8692 what about the man who claimed to be a secret service agent ? Was he made up too ? With the dirty fingernails ? You seem to have missed that part.
@@robertromero8692 Who were the men in Dealey Plaza dressed as Secret Service agents? Who was the man that impersonated LHO in Mexico City in Oct 1963? Why was the autopsy evidence twisted around? Why did the HSCA move the head shot up about 4 inches? Why did the HSCA admit that someone was rearranging boxes by the sniper's nest minutes after the final shot, when LHO was on the 2nd floor face to face with DPD officer Baker? Why didn't the coworkers at the TSBD see LHO flying down the stairs?
@@peterfraser9070 he perhaps realizes that the only way to get away clean with a thing like that is if you are the international bankers and thus direct the CIA, Mossad, et cetera. You're the only one here who seems to extract his cabeza from his high-knee to speak.
@@peterfraser9070 I know his brain was stolen, I know Ruby shot Oswald on TV, I know dozens of witnesses turned up dead, I know after Nov 63, we get mass shootings, mass cult activity, mass war, and that's all I need to know about it.
Lee Harvey Oswald,asked for legal representation six times,during the time he was in police custody.How come he was Not afforded an attorney? The man,who supposedly came from some" legal organization" asked him if he wanted a lawyer?" What on earth was Jack Ruby doing there,after Oswald was being" paraded" up and down the corridor of the police st.? How is it,that Lee Harvey Oswald was taken a couple more times in front of All those reporters,when this Is the person,who was allegedly accused of shooting President Kennedy? I would think the police dept.would have kept Oswald away from All those people!
Not true he was offered an attorney even got a visit from a man name Nichols who went on his jail cell and asked him.do you want an attorney he said no.He was assisting on this Abt guy so that is a myth.
@Nancy Sanders-No legitimate Law Enforcement Department would allow any civilians to be present when a suspect or detainee was being transported To say that Jack Ruby was allowed in the basement because he was "friendly" and known by some of the officers is another lie perpetuated by the Warren Commission.
@@randyharris3175 - And please tell us what that had to do with Jack Ruby being there. He was not a member of The Press. Show me where The Warren Commission said it was perfectly normal for a civilian( Jack Ruby ) with a gun to be in that position.
I had a near death experience. I saw god and said, “I always wanted to know who killed Kennedy”. god said to me “it was Oswald”. I turned to the guy behind me in line and said this is deeper than I thought.
"I had a near death experience. I saw god and said, “I always wanted to know who killed Kennedy”": Good point. This would apply to CT people. No matter what, they're gonna believe what they want to believe.
Best sign of coverup: At about 1:50 the WC is quoted as saying nobody at the overpass thought any shots had been fired from the front. But MULTIPLE people testified they had heard shot from the stockade fence and seen smoke, and MOST witnesses said they had heard shots from BOTH front and rear. If a report simply denies this, it's a lie. Cf. Josiah Thompson's 1967 and 2021 books on this case.
Had they held the limo for evidence they'd found shots came in from both the front and back and the head shot coming from the drain hole on the road with the blood shooting straight up and to the back. Kennedy out of the way they can make Vietnam a full blown war for the makers of war machines the oil men of Texas and steel mills. War is good for business never mind who gets killed just as long as they sell thier products. They are the puppeteers.
Spot on. The biggest conundrum is that a shooter in that 6th floor window would have taken the easy shot on Houston with the limo headed directly at him before turning on Elm.
Bill Hicks said how realistic the assassination museum is because when you go to the place where Oswald was supposed to be, he wasn't there just like he wasn't at the moment of the assassination.
Who says Oswald wasn't at the 6th floor window during the assassination? How bizarre. So Oswald let a look-alike use the rifle that he brought - his rifle - and this look-alike somehow managed to leave Oswald's prints? Wow. Bizarre.
@@peterfraser9070 You give yourself away as a victim of the most common logical fallacy to which humans fall victim. The appeal to authority. You are looking for "reliable sources" rather than logically coherent sequences.
"I can hardly stomach Dan Rather...oh how I wish anyone but him had seen the Zapruder film before the feds got it...": I can hardly stomach someone with your attitude, frankly. I know how much importance you attach to my opinion, so I just thought I'd let you know. 😉
@@vernpascal1531 yes you’d have to be really very gullible to believe that Oswald took his M38 Carcano to work disguised as curtain rods after hearing that the motorcade was going to pass by his window and having already attempted at least one other assassination and believe he didn’t use it. You’d have to be really gullible to believe that he was acting alone on the overwhelming evidence that no other gunmen were seen, no other shots were fired, no other shells were recovered except those from Oswald’s rifle in the TSBD. What do you think Oswald took his own mail order rifle to work for? The truth is Vern you’ve got to be a complete fantasist to join up dots where they don’t exist, your gullibility is what Oswald, the violent liar, the repeated wife beating self proclaimed Marxist, the fluent Russian speaker, the Cuban agitator from Russia with love, the attempted assassin and then imagine for the sake of convenience that anyone in their right mind would want to work with that ego inflated self important fruitcake in any plot. Do you have any evidence that Oswald was not alone, other than with his wife?
I remember the assassination and this time very clearly, but I was only 8 then. I don't remember this report and realize it would have been hard for me to understand the implications of the broadcast or the Warren Report. Looking at it now 58 years later, I realize it was a much more innocent/naive time for the people of the US. Mr. Cronkite and Mr. Rather both keep saying the questions will be answered by the Warren Report being released a few minutes later. It was a time when we though collectively that our government would always tell us the truth. We know better now. So many lies to hide this coup even though the truth was evident and clearly stated in this broadcast. A marine taught Russian by the US government, got a loan from the US government to help him return to the US from Russia, got his passport within a day, testimony from his mother, files from observations, surveillance and face to face encounters with the Oswald family by the FBI and CIA prior to the assassination (they new all about him, but had no concern expressed to local authorities for him working on the parade route of the President), met with the person overseeing assassinations at the Russian Embassy in Mexico October 8 and involved in the murder of a US President 5 weeks later--all of this by a poor guy working a temp job for $1.50 an hour? LH Oswald clearly had the support of the CIA and probably others. FBI Chief Hoover was a scum who was completely capable of something like the murder of Kennedy. Doesn't look like the people of the US have learned much. Since then, murders like this have become just part of business as usual and has changed the direction of the country.
There was so much fabricated stories created by forces within the government circles.The American people today are not fools and can see the true facts on the assassination.
The problem is that many people are still gullible and believe everything they hear - they've just transferred their faith from government to dishonest conspiracy authors.
On this particular story, Dan Rather has always been full of shit. Shame on you Dan Rather, you know better. What is it that you were so afraid of? You did not do your job.
You would have to have the Brain Power of less than a Chimpanzee to believe Oswald did this on his own. Of course that's Collins,Vaughn,Mauldsley,Nickerson etc.
@@vernpascal1531 Or, an alternate (and perhaps more plausible explanation): you would have to actually *read* the majority of the testimony of the Dealey Plaza witnesses to see quite plainly that there was obviously only a single gunman. That alone doesn't prove that gunman was Oswald, of course, but without a second gunman conspiracy instantly becomes several orders of magnitude more difficult to demonstrate.
Why did Oswald, if he was innocent, pull a gun on the police officer inside the Texas Theatre ? The officer simply asked him to stand up. Why did Oswald say "It's all over now" and pull his gun ? Did Oswald think he was being arrested for not purchasing his theatre ticket ? Why did Oswald use deadly force to defend himself from a cop who was arresting him for not buying a ticket ? What's up with that ?
Many don't even think he did the shooting. Now that's really bizarre considering the evidence, but then again, they don't care about the truth, they're just in love with conspiracy stories.
Ignorance and Hollywood. People just don’t know the facts and mountains of evidence against Oswald because its been muddied over with 60 years on conspiracy nonsense. That’s why it’s great the dpd took a lot of eyewitness testimony in the days after, because now we can see who has changed their stories after lane’s book and others come out that flooded their head with conspiracies. ie. Hill. They don’t claim they see nothing out of the ordinary in the days after, but years later, after the books came out, now they see a shooter on the grassy knoll, a puff of smoke or something. And the second thing is purely fictional Hollywood movies like JFK. With nothing but conspiracy theories parading around as fact. And also people watch too many movies and think that stuff can happen in real life, like a bunch of cia Jason bournes pulled this off.
One question I’ve never heard answered is, if Oswald was really bringing curtain rods into the building, and not a rifle, were the curtain rods ever found? Anyone know?
Oswald's room had curtains. No curtain rods were ever in Oswald's possession; he brought his rifle to work, partially disassembled I believe, nicely wrapped in brownish paper. He used the rifle to slay Kennedy. The circumstances at the TBD were odd in that they were restoring or replacing flooring at the level Oswald fired from- so stacks of books were all pushed to one side, inadvertently creating a convenient wall for Oswald to work behind. Like most assassins, Oswald was a nut job; and in his case a political nut job. The boy left the USA to immigrate to the USSR! OY VEY! NOBODY but a nut job does that! The folks in Russia, who didn't quite know what to make of him wanted to ask him, "your what hurts?"
@@bobdecarlo7778 yea yea you can parrot the lone gunmen nut jobs. But Buel Fraiser who drove him to work said Oswald did not have a rifle. End of story.
It's fascinating to me that at just 37 seconds into this report, we can see the view from the snipers nest, and how the traffic sign momentarily comes into view in front of the occupants of the car. The current thinking is that Oswald's first shot hit that sign and ricocheted into the kerb causing injury to James Tague. But nobody seems to have realised that at the time.
The fragment that caused an injury to Tague more than likely came from the 3rd and fatal headshot. At the time of the headshot, Tague and the limo were almost in a straight line to the depository and fragments from the headshot hit and damaged the windshield and the chrome above it (also lining up with Tague's position). Tague himself said he wasn't hit by the first shot which is the shot that missed the car.
Dan Rather the guy that said JFK flew forward with the headshot after watching the Zapruder film. And he's been lying ever since": ua-cam.com/video/o0d6LG27hQM/v-deo.html
He was right about going forward. Crowd witness clearly stated last 2 shots was bang bang..2 shots. .. 1st hits him in back. Then less then a full second later he is pushed back hard an piece of his scalp an blood go back some of it lands on motorcycle cop just behind Limmo when for who knows why driver slowed way down. . Super slow motion an play stop it's on Zapruder film.
Very interesting film which, if viewed (and listened to ) carefully contradicts the Warren Commission on numerous occasions. For example, at 47:00, the 'dot' on the back of the "President" indicates where he was shot- and this is the bullet that, according to the Warren Commission, then manages to come out from the President's neck, just above his shirt collar. Only problem is that the shots were, according to the Warren Commission, all coming from the sixth floor of the TSBD building. Only possible if the shooter was in the boot of the car and shot through the back seat...shooting upwards ofcourse....
Computer analysis and medical analysis shows very clearly the bullet's trajectory and all the wounds suffered by the victims line up perfectly with Oswald's window. Don't forget the limo was travelling on a downhill grade as well.
@@aaronz7056 The conspirators stole the brain because they didn't want traces of mercury from the mercury loaded exploding bullet to be discovered on it! Clint Hill burned all his blood stained clothing. Jackie's pink suit is locked away for a gazillion years. Must be the mercury, man!
@@aaronz7056 It must be the coke when you start believing in magic bullets, disappearing shotguns, exploding heads that reappear whole again in photographs....yeah, you’d have to be off your head to believe in the Warren magic show!
IF Oswald had co-conspirators then why didn't they plan his escape ? His escape plan was to walk out the front door and get on a bus. Why wasn't there a "get away" car waiting for him after the shooting ?
Oswald was the lone assassin. I have been to that window. I walked that street. It was an easy hit. No second gunman was involved. The first shot that hit Kennedy in the neck, was done from behind. It was so close from where Oswald was, that someone with a BB gun could have done it. Anyone from the picket fence was out of range. The fatal shot was a bit further away, but still a close and clear shot. There could not have been a second gunman from behind the picket fence, because there was no getaway. That area was surrounded by railroad tracks except for two small roads that would have led to the Texas School Book Depository building. That area was sealed off because of the motorcade. After shots were fired, well, no one was getting out. No one fired from a sewer and the driver certainly did not do it. Come on! Oswald did it. The Warren Commission got it right.
@GeorgeVreelandHill You have concurred (correctly it must be said) with the Warren Commission and the HSCA (after their 4th shot theory was discredited).
Why didn't Oswald just buy a ticket when he got to the Texas Theatre ? I he was (allegedly) meeting someone there, was his instructions to "enter the theatre, but don't buy a ticket"? That's just stupid. Who would believe such a story ?
@@alwagner9722 It means you need to look objectively at available facts and evidence and question alternative sources - the ones that vilify what they disparagingly call "official versions", meanwhile offering dishonest versions of their own.
@@peterfraser9070 looking at the facts and evidence objectively should work both ways. For researchers and those who accept only the official report. I'm a natural born skeptic. I question everything, including alternate conspiracy theories. I also question the official version. After researching everything from the Central Bank to JFK , Gulf of Tonkin incident, USS Liberty attack, OKC bombing and 9/11, I absolutely do not trust anything that comes out of the mouth of a US politician. You may be patriotic, maybe a vet,whatever, the thing is, do you not question anything about the Warren Report? You discount every aspect of all the different conspiracy theories surrounding the assassination? It's called objectivity..right? Look at the Commission staff. All DC insiders and one Allen Dulles. My opinion of politicians - I like to refer to them as DC swamp creatures, dictates: DO NOT TRUST THEM. When one looks at the big picture..not just JFK...and realizes the dubious nature of the US government, from 1913 to 9/11/01, it's like a lifting of the veil. And with the corporate owned Mockingbird media, well...they've got everything and everyone (the dumbed down) American public, under control. Cheers!
Oswalds mother says that she believes he was an agent in Russia and that he was ordered to go to Russia and marry his Russian wife. I think she said that because she actually had knowledge of these things from Lee. I’m not sure why she chose to say that she believed those things, instead of saying she knew
Who would put together a list of all the obvious questions that the American people had concerning the assassination and then debunk it instead of investigate it?
@@aaronz7056 It has - what may confuse and mislead some people is that Lee Harvey Oswald was never actually convicted of murder. In fact, it has never been proven in any court exactly who killed JFK. His murder is officially unsolved to this day! Any time the assassination got near a court, juries consistently reached the conclusion that there was a conspiracy. Even the United States House of Representatives Select Committee on Assassinations (HSCA) concluded that there was a conspiracy. Public opinion has always been that there was a conspiracy too.
I'd like to hear what a modern day "body language" expert makes of the testimonies of the people being interviewed! The minute most of them start to speak they look down and away from the camera lense, not wanting to look the camera in the eye!
"I'd like to hear what a modern day "body language" expert makes of the testimonies of the people being interviewed!": Here's an analysis of Oswald: "Lee Harvey Oswald: Rare Footage Body Language Analysis".
Please dude, there's already plenty of theories about this hole JFK assassination... Let's not bring pseudoscience into it now. It would be as close as saying that aliens were involved.
How come all those people Oswald claimed he had lunch with on 11/22 all said that they didn't have lunch with Oswald ? Why did Oswald lie about who he ate his lunch with ? Why would he do that if he was innocent ?
They need him to he the only one. Oswald who was a radar operator asked to have an early discharge, it was granted by the marines, he left for Europe. While in Europe he defected to the USSR and denounced the USA and surrendered his passport to the US embassy in Moscow. The State department, FBI can CIA were notified of his actions at the height of the cold war. How did he get passports for himself and his family? Who authorized the passports? if you start at this point in time we will find all the connections to the government we need to know it was a conspiracy.
"They need him to he the only one.": I used to believe the Warren Report was bs only because I'd heard that it was. That, plus 'back and to the left' and stories of suspicious goings on going on behind the picket fence made me think, "Isn't there something to all that? Did Oswald really do it??" Then I saw the film of the actual witnesses talking and realized how "JFK" and other CT sources distorted the witnesses own words. I looked at the Z Film and realized, hey, his head explodes and stuff flies forward, after that, his upper-body jerks back. He wasn't knocked back by a bullet. Then looking at frames 312 to 314 I could see he'd been knocked forward first. These silly notions of a massive conspiracy just evaporated. It was like when I was a kid and realized, hey, how could there really be a Santa Claus who flies around the world in one night and delivers presents to everyone. It was like waking up from a dream and soon realizing, oh, of course, that was only a dream. There isn't really an elephant in the next room.
George De Mohrenchildt whom he met in Japan, an old OSS working on U2. He was not trusted enough to be CIA. He was a geologist in the oil, he was Oswald's "best friend" introduced him to Ruth and Michael Paine, who feed, housed, helped with every need including diapers and clothes for the baby and new baby, and kept his wife, wife to Michael who trained helicopter pilots in Cuba. Michael Paine took Oswald on many errands, to dinner parties by the " White Russians" headquartered in Dallas. Maybe to General Walker's house. Oswald went to George M's hometown Minsk in Russia which is Belarus now. and was introduced around by him through references and helped with learning Russian and friends that helped Oswald.
@mike .D Oswald's defection to the Soviet Union at the height of the Cold War only testifies to his kooky and unstable character, not to any conspiracy.
@@apointofinterest8574 how do you know this?? He was being used, he wanted to be a spy! Height of the Cold War, we just had missiles pointed at us, the country was on high alert school, towns were practicing to run to fall out shelters! Scary times!
@@shernitadee The Soviets, apprehending his neurotic, unstable character, and ascertaining how little he knew about the U2, never took Oswald nor his spy ambitions seriously. Thus, Lee's hopes of playing James Bond came to an abrupt end. Oswald's reaction to this disappointment, as well as to failing to become a Soviet citizen, and also being threatened with deportation? He tries to commit suicide by slitting his wrist. Some spy....
@@kathyhantge964 yes he was! I believe soo too…I’ve been an avid researcher for over 10 years and my final decision is there was an Oswald doppelganger just like Vince Palamara believes
My sister was 18 and I was 14. We were celebrating our birthday. It came as a surprise and eventually a shock because it was the first time we had seen an assassination. Radio/TV stations eventually went silent in respect for President Kennedy💔😢
What’s wild about this is the timing of the release of this special, which is before the Warren Commission Report was released to the public. Cronkite says the program was airing on the day of, hours before the public release of the Report. So these interviews represent a small slice of history that takes place after the assassination and before the release of the Report. We can immediately see how witnesses were openly talking about things that (unbeknownst to them) would end up either being entirely omitted from, or contradicted by the Report. Since the Report was mainstreamed and officialized by virtually every major institution in America, the accounts of these witnesses were essentially lost to history. I was stunned when I heard LHO’s mother, for instance, openly stating that her son was sent to Russia and was very clearly a US govt agent. I was similarly intrigued by how seriously and directly mainstream reporters like Dan Rather were openly pondering whether or not LHO was affiliated with the CIA, given that a few decades later it would not be acceptable for a mainstream media figure to express this publicly. I’m fascinated by how these were apparently serious opinions and perceptions explicitly held by these people up until the moment the Warren Report was released. From that point onward, all of this got memory-holed, and those of us born well after these moments grew up in a historical, political, and cultural environment that considered the very same ideas expressed by these witnesses to be “crazy conspiracy theories”. This is a testimony to the powerful effect that the Warren Report had on shaping the future telling of history. Moreover, laid bare in this video is evidence of the effectiveness of the information warfare operation that was waged on the American public by deep state actors in the decades to come, and how their efforts were aided and abetted by a corporate media landscape that was fully compromised by the military/state security apparatus.
LHO mom's testimony in this program threw me for a loop as well. She stated very clearly that she didn't think he was a govt. agent but KNEW he was due to several corespondents she herself had with other agents... I am not even through the whole thing yet but the Tippit murder on a personal level becomes more and more interesting and baffling as time goes on. Many things said here did not make it's way into the Warren report and you are right about this being a snapshot into the events of that day BEFORE the report came out
Warren report, we're not too foolish to trust. This group set by big criminal lbj who killed JFK and allen dullness fired by JFK, then covered up by lbj and nixon's underling, gerald ford as a cover-up
What reason do you have for promoting your false narratives and all your conspiracy rhetoric? You are not helping anything by pushing conspiracy theories.
you only need to hear about this one fact to understand; immediately after the deed,they started repairing and refurbishing the limousine. AFAIK,this is a federal felony.
If it is a federal felony now, I'm not sure it was back then. The murder of a president itself was not a federal crime back then; it was designated as a state crime only.
@@sebastianrutkowski7316 The tampering with evidence material, at that time, was not a federal crime, because the murder itself was not a federal crime, as I have already explained.
The person Oswald was (allegedly) meeting inside the Texas Theatre, does anyone know if THAT person purchased his ticket, or did he also slip in without paying ?
A German Mauser 7.65 overnight turned into a Italian Manlicher Carcano 6.5 cal. Exit wounds became entrance wounds............. The 2 types of bullets found in mr Tippet couldn't be fired from Oswalds revolver. 3 Expert Marksman couldn''t get 3 shots of in the time the shots were fired, further more none of them was able to hit the head of a stationary target. Note: Oswald's scope was also mis aligned. Why the commision never saw the authopsie pictures? And why 15 doctors from Parkland all said that the president had an exit wound at the back of his head?
A) No Mauser was found, cops freely owned up to misidentifying the rifle, big deal. B) Parkland doctors were speculating wildly about the wounds. C) Oswald was using two types of ammo in the revolver and nearly a dozen witnesses ID'd him as the man who shot Tippit and fled D) Shooting was successfully recreated by investigators using Oswald' rifle and 3 shots over 8-9 seconds at a slow-moving target a maximum of 88 yards off is hardly a superhuman feat, inf act it's child's play for a trained Marine E) Parkland doctors looked at the autopsy photos and had no particular problem with them.
@@aaronz7056 looks like you're still at it. JTRIG troll/ mockingbird media mouthpiece, How's that working for ya? Makin any progress with your trolling tactics? I didn't think so. You should get a life...troll bot.
Someone who did not know what kind of rifle it was said it was a Mauser, but this was inaccurately reported. Right away it was known as an Italian rifle made in 1940. No brand name was on the rifle. Soon the order letter for this rifle signed by Oswald was uncovered. Hundreds, not three, experts and shooters have shown over and over that there was plenty of time for 3 shots from the carcano rifle, and it was over 8 seconds between shot one and shot three, not 6. Apparently this was shown in Stone's JFK movie too, although it was denied there. The bullet's from Oswald's pistol could not be matched for certain with the pistol, but probably were. They were smaller than the barrel. The bullet shells WERE matched to Oswald's pistols to the exclusion of all other guns in the world. Oswald's scope was not mis-aligned at least as far as could be seen visibly. All experts said it was an easy shot for anyone with any training, which Oswald had. Warren hid the autopsy photos from the commission at the request of the Kennedy family. The doctors at Parkland did not do an autopsy and did not know whether wounds were exit or entrance wounds. The autopsy photos were examined by the Clark panel in 1968 and by other doctors, and they clearly showed that JFK was hit from behind. Stop spreading misinformation and learn the facts. This is a good video.
Also that the MARINE CORP taught him to speak and write Russian. They KNEW he was going to Russia and it seems likely they were involved in that. It doesn't mean they knew the CIA was going to use him as THE PATSY.
glockumole and Rick fountain: Does anyone know if it's annotated in his military records that he attended military language school to learn Russian? I know from friends that learned Russian in the military that the course takes about a year. Also, all branches use the same military training facility, DLI, in California for language training. He would had to have good grades to pass that school. It's a question I've always had and military record of his learning Russian in the military would be answered by those records. Please comment. Thanks.
@@gjle he was learing A LOT of stuff while in the USMC, except how to drive a car...He traveled the world, was in the USMC, yet didnt even have the ability to drive a car....Someone taught him Russian, and it wasnt himself.
@@dustyflair That really amazes me. How did he get to and from Walker's house? On a bus, back and forth with his rifle?? And He couldn't even drive himself? He had big time help, being given rides by Forbes inheritance 1960, his mother Ruth Forbes, Michael Paine who refused to pledge allegiance even when in the military. The Paines' saw to his most every need! Took care of his family needs, feed them, clothed them, gave advice, rides, help him get his job. That is what I call help.
Good stuff starting at 1:34:42 and ending at 1:35:24! Connolly does not agree that the bullet struck JFK in the back was the same bullet that hit him. In short, he disagrees with the magic bullet theory!
It is really odd that nothing I post about searching for the index to the WR on any site lasts in a post in these comments for more than a few seconds, and then gets taken down. Are people really THAT afraid of anyone reading the WR?
Doesn't change the fact that the attendant part of the back of JFK's head did not collapse until after he was taken into Parklands, nor that it was a frangible bullet exploding along the right side of JFK's head, as to be observed in the Zapruder Film.
What world do you live in there was a baseball size hole in the back of his head when he got to the hospital his brains were falling out the police officer riding to the left rear of the vehicle was covered in blood brain and bone what the fuck are you people listening to Dan rather really this is why it’s people like you that we’re still in the state were in do you actually work for the government because it sounds like you do you’re gonna stand behind that all the bullshit no matter what did you see the bullet they said broke Conley’s rib is still in perfect condition I’ve never seen a bullet do that ever and neither has anyone else you know why????
@@donaldleavy4379 …..the motorcycle cops were covered in blood/brain because the blood shot upward & they were going slowly forward right into it. Also, those same doctors say exactly what we see in the Zapruder film too. It just depends on whether you seen em in a conspiracy theory doc or lone shooter doc. I bet you think the Zapruder film…all 3 copies of it…were fakes, huh? And we can plainly see the back of his head intact there 😂 plus there’s the fact that Kennedy’s skull was shattered. So it could have fallen apart with all the jostling, etc while carrying him in. The hole was on the right front, but the only thing holding everything together was his scalp. Everything can be explained. We lone shooter believers don’t care either way & go by evidence. You conspiracy theorists want a conspiracy because you have something against the government. Which is why when debating, conspiracy theorists always have an attitude. And absolutely no evidence. Just theories. Anything can be made into a conspiracy if you really want it to be.
@@donaldleavy4379 ….also, I’ve seen an experiment on Nova where they shot the same exact bullet through 3 two by fours and it was undamaged!! They also had a 99 year old man re-enact the shots with the same gun and he did easily.
"nor that it was a frangible bullet exploding along the right side of JFK's head, as to be observed in the Zapruder Film.": You observed the bullet and decided it was a "frangible"?? Non-frangible bullets fragment, you know.
@@timashcraft6262 Tippet saw the two shooters leave the Texas School Book Depository in the back while he was sitting in his patrol car. They later killed him.
@@timashcraft6262 Rubbish, he was out on patrol elsewhere, nobody ever saw a man in a cop uniform escaping the area, and if Badge Man was a shooter, that photo shows he was standing about 20 feet back from the fence and was about ten feet tall.
@@aaronz7056 it would be interesting to get ALL the dental reports on Ruby’s mother’s teeth. They were not all included in the Warren Commission report.
At 1:26 the clips that hold the shoulder strap is on the bottom of the rifle and the picture they have of Oswell posing at his house with a rifle the clips that hold the shoulder strap are on the side of the rifle so that means it's a different rifle.
In 1993 a medical student who was working at Parkland Hospital on the day of the assassination was interviewed, and she stated that she saw the presidential limo immediately after it arrived, and there was a bullet hole in windshield from the FRONT to the BACK.
Only damage to the windshield is a crack from a bullet fragment which also damaged the chrome plating... from the *inside.* Both are still in the National Archives.
There were several medical students and several Dallas Policeman who also saw the hole, "big enough to stick a pencil through" as one motorcycle trooper named Ellis reported. Medical student named Evalea Glanges saw it, and she later went on to become the CEO of another major hospital in Dallas. She never changed or altered her testimony. The Secret Service then quickly drove the limo away, despite it being the "scene of the crime" and should have remained untouched, untampered with, and unmoved as vital evidence. But the windshield was changed and the interior was completely redone within two days according to technicians at the Ford plant in Ohio who actually performed the work.
@@ghostdance56 What did I literally just say? And the idea somebody was standing somewhere in front of the limo, firing through glass (!) and past the ears of a carful of passengers while shooting Kennedy in the face, all the while assuming this would be framed on a lone shooter from behind, is laughable.
@@aaronz7056 - You're consistently laughable son. Don't know what you said, I never think about what you say, what would be the point of that, you're clueless. The windshield had the hole, it came from a shot from the overpass that struck Kennedy in the neck. Now run along son, lets the adults have their conversations.
@@ghostdance56why do you resort to childish insults when someone presents an alternative view from yours? An adult would discuss it, not resort to childish behavior.
WHY,...have I never heard anyone question the motorcade route - last minute change?? The only person who had the authority to change the route was the Mayor Earle Cabell who was the brother of Charles Cabell (deputy director of the CIA) He was fired by JFK after the bay of pigs fiasco. The motorcade was originally supposed to go straight down under the triple overpass train bridge to the trade mart. It was changed to a route that was ILLEGAL according to Fletcher Prouty (chief of special operations for the joint chiefs of staff) under JFK. The assassination just happened to take place in the area where the motorcade route was changed. No connection? Just a coincidence? This fact alone is proof of government collusion. WAKE UP AMERICA.
In an interview with LBJ filmed in September 1969, Walter Cronkite asked LBJ whether he was satisfied there was no international conspiracy in the JFK assassination. LBJ requested that his answer not be broadcast on the grounds of 'national security'. It was eventually broadcast after his death. The following is what he said: LBJ: "I can't honestly say that I've ever been completely relieved of the fact that there might have been international connections". Cronkite: "You mean you still feel that there might might have been?" LBJ shifts uncomfortably in his seat. LBJ: "Uh, well I have not completely discounted it". Cronkite: "Well that would seem to indicate that you, uh, don't have full confidence in the Warren Commission Report". LBJ: "No. No, I think the Warren Commission study an....I think first of all is composed of the ablest and most judicious and bipartisan men in this country. Second, I think they had only one objective and that was the truth. Third, I think they were competent and did the best they could. But I don't think that they or me or anyone else is always absolutely sure of every thing that might have motivated Oswald or....or...others that, uh, could have been involved".
@@lebeautymarq8834 He lied to the cops and cameras at the police station about a lot of things. He said on film he didn't know why he had been brought in to the station. But during his arrest at the theatre earlier, when he was first approached by a policeman, he said, "This is it!", punched the cop and tried to shoot him!
The Marines certainly facilitated his trip to Russia, whether they ordered him or not. He wasn't supposed to go anywhere according to his discharge, because he left the Corps early on the grounds that his mom was ill and needed him at home to care for her. He NEEDED the Marine Corps permission to travel outside of the US as he was required to enlist in the Reserves as a part of his discharge agreement. He was granted this permission after applying for it almost immediately after leaving. Citing he was to go to Switzerland to study at The Albert Schweitzer School, (which has long been regarded as a CIA front...). So they discharged him to go home and look after his mom, and immediately granted him permission to leave his sick mom, violating the terms of his discharge. And considering his defection and announcement that he would tell the Russians everything he knew, and considering that the "Untouchable" U2 spy plane flown by FG Powers (the sort Oswald was trained to track...) was shot down during his stay in Russia, it's really very odd that he was never even questioned by the authorities on his return. Or not in any "official" capacity at any rate. As Costner as Garrison points out in Stone's "JFK" he should have been arrested and charged as a traitor. But he was granted a new passport and loaned the money to travel home. Presumably they were more keen to make sure he fulfilled his promise to go home and take care of his poor old mom, than get to the bottom of his time in Russia, and Lee clearly needed his new Russian bride, (whose granting of a visa was as close to a miracle as the US State Department has ever performed) to help?
THIS, THIS, THIS!! Oswald lied time and time again, even committing a felony of printing false identifications for not only himself but others. It seems he could do no wrong and his family was well taken care. Even with the birth if his new baby, they set them up and our tax dollars paid for the hospital of the new baby girl.
His mission to the Soviet union was to breakup the Paris peace SUMMIT set for middle MAY 1960 but the MAY 1 1960 U 2 shootdown broke off the Paris peace SUMMIT and continued the rightwing warhawk COLD WAR
His first mission was in Japan at the queen bee night club in downtown Tokyo ( go inside the queen bee and provide false information to KGB AGENTS at the queen bee about the U2 spy planes at atsugi air base )
She didn’t help,Marina asked her did she know of anybody hiring for work for Oswald,he went for the interview and got it ! Hardly like Ruth Paine was insisting on it,you’re making a moot point !
@@shanet5604 forget about it, no one’s insisting Ruth Paine masterminded it. It’s just one more point of interest-Oswald working at a building owned by the founder of the civil air patrol.
Have never seen these interviews put together like this is before..very nice job! about the speaking Russian thing, marina once said during an interview that when she first met Oswald at the factory they worked at she thought he had to be a local as his Russian was very good and he had the same accent and used the same colloquialism's as the locals and spoke with them effortlessly..she had been brought in from another city to work in the factory like a lot of the workers there..yet once back in the USA multiple people said his Russian was not very good at all, he spoke it in a childish way often having to resort to English words as his vocabulary was poor, and had an awkward Texan element to his accent that made his Russian sound strange..some people think this is evidence the Oswald that went and the Oswald that came back were two different guys..this was supposedly a thing both sides did..when there was a national that wanted to defect we would train a "match" for them to operate as an agent..allowing us to get our defector and us to get an agent in to the county and leave the national as a "Ghost" that could operate anywhere..has always seemed a little convulted for me tho.
Yea that's why I said this theory has always seemed too convoluted to me..just like to see how even far out ideas realte in new ways..I have kept it in mind over the years since I think I first heard the idea in probably the movie JFK and seeing how Oliver stone touted this a different Oswald that went came back...if something like this theory ever did actually play out like this I imagine something that huge would only be risked or attempted for someone extremly important and I don't know who Oswald would be replacing or vice versa that could be that important..there is one thing regarding this I have found interesting tho..look at Oswalds enlistment photo from the military and then the photo of him and marina arriving back in the US on the ship..they say the relationship of your features to each other don't really change much..if you look at the 2 picks the relationship of where his ears line up to his eyeline and upper lip, there sure appears like there is a very different relationship between them and how they line up when comparing the two photos..as a matter of fact the return home pic which is the first one of his repatriation, doesn't really seem to match up well with any other Oswald photos...not saying it's not him it's just an interesting anecdotal point
@@jamesharen8607 Still a ridiculous one, and as for Oliver Stone, that guy just made up so much stuff in that worthless pack of fiction movie of his it would take all day to list it all, but at least he made himself a bundle of money peddling that garbage.
@@aaronz7056 You should watch the new documentary Oliver Stone has just released, ‘JFK Revisited: Through the Looking Glass’. He lays out some of the physical evidence for conspiracy in it. It might be more to your taste!
Allen Dulles. He was looking for himself. Ex head of the CIA had a lot of clout to get his “retired” self appointed as one of the “8 prominent Americans”
Dulles and his brother were corrupt fascists. Just ask the people of Guatemala and Iran, who saw their democracies die so the Dulles brothers and their cronies could make more money of their corporate holdings. The book Bitter Fruit documents all this.
Dulles and Bush41 were both CIA Directors forced to resign by JFK and Al Gore with Bill Clinton. Both Directors were connected to the Kennedy assassination and the 2000 voting controversy thru two sets of brothers, the Cabell and the Bush brothers. Earl Cabell was the Mayor of Dallas and Jeb Bush was the Governor of Florida. Mayor Cabell's brother was the ex-CIA Deputy Director Charles Cabell, forced to retire along with his CIA boss, Allen Dulles, by JFK. Governor Jeb Bush's brother, George W Bush, father was forced to retire as President by the presidential team of Al Gore and Bill Clinton. Texas was the home state of the next President, Vice President Lyndon Johnson. Florida was the political home state of the brother of the next President, the son of a Vice President, George W Bush. Not a coincidence, to much to be just a coincidence. It was a similar repeat of the Kennedy assassination in Florida. Why?
I was eating a grilled cheese sandwich and watching an episode of Matlock from my DVD box set earlier today when I realized that I was under 4 years old when JFK was assassinated and that all this time I have not been doing my part in getting to the bottom of this investigation. My feelings went from "I'm going to quit my job to devote my entire life to this" to "I have no frame of reference.... I'm like a child who wanders into the middle of a movie and wants to know..." But at the same time I'm thinking that the answers are most likely found in Hunter Biden's laptop, but what do I know.... oh well, fuck it, I'm going bowling.
I was eating a bag of sour cream and onion chips and watching my DVD collection of McMillan and Wife when I realized that I was 5 years old when that show began, and all that I cared about at the time was watching Romper Room. Remember Romper Room? That was an American show, right? I wonder if it's still on the air. I wanted to be on that show...
Sounds like you have a good life. But try and upgrade from "pasteurized processed cheese product" to real cheese. It costs more. But cost shouldn't matter to a a Democrat.
@@bluesandmore786 Ahhh...in other words, don't just let the CT Machine spoon-feed you conspiracy theories and gobble it up. Look at real-life evidence and accept the truth, even if it's boring and Oswald did do it, mostly likely all by his lonesome.
@@bluesandmore786 Speaking of Blues and More....your ID brings back memories...... back in the late 80s, the owners of B.L.U.E.S. on Halsted street in Chicago decided to open a music club that ventured into other styles - Zydeco, for example - and called it Blues Etcetera. They didn't have grilled cheese sandwiches, but it was a great little place.
I was a senior in high school on November 22,1963. I stayed home from school that day. My mother came home from work early crying. She immediately turned the television on and I heard the official announcement from Walter Cronkite. When he said the President was dead I was numb.
Interesting. What school did you go to?
The world changed that day. He was at war with the military industrial complex that Eisenhower warned about and they won.
What high school in Dallas? Most of the schools in Oakcliff let out early that day with everything going on
Which president was he talking about??
@@TELEVISIONARCHIVES I went to a high school in Maine
Thank you for putting this program on UA-cam. People like you are keeping this part of history alive in the public conscious
I would have thought that LHO was the type of person that would gleefully admit to killing Kennedy,
And not deny shooting anyone ?
Just a passing thought
Every propaganda video previously made will have to be burned until every bit of info is released
@@johnwilliams-ih3pvwhy? You know the result would've been the death penalty, right?
@@johnwilliams-ih3pv If Oswald wanted to claim he shot President Kennedy,he would have and Not kept denying it. What you stated is quite a realistic,logical statement.I agree with it.
@@franclin0 No,there was Not sufficient physical evidence to charge and convict Oswald.Oswald did Not shoot anyone .
Bottom line is 60 years later and the assassination is still classified. Enough said.
national security and all
Interesting to see how many HSCA interviews with CIA agents and officials that are still classified and hidden from the public.
@@PANCHOVILLAMATO Yup. Anybody that still defends The Warren Commission is nobody you need to hear from.
Johnny roselli and sam giancana got chainsaw to death before they could testify at the house select committee on assassinations
Chainsaw massacre for Johnny roselli and SAM GIANCANA
And they are still lying to us on a daily basis
@ James Malcom Watch U.S.S. Liberty on Real News Network. Unarmed U.S. Spy ship
attacked in 1967. 34 U.S. dead & 171 wounded. It's like part 2. Cover up continues by both parties & govt. What would JFK do? Iran/Contra/ Israel. The Finders/ Franklin &
Epstein scandals from 70 ' s till now. Watch Nick Bryant show anout Franklin
Savings & Loan & sex w/ kids. Epstein is the tip of iceberg. All protected by govt.
Fucking losers.
Hourly. ;)
People lie to themselves on a daily basis
No justice no peace…
"Nobody wonders what Lyndon and I wear..."...It's GOLD!!
A lot of people think that Oswald's view of the limo could not have been blocked by the leaves on the trees because it was November. While most trees shed their leaves in the fall and are bare during the Winter months, those trees were Texas Live Oak. Texas Live Oak trees shed their leaves in the Spring, not the fall. Therefore, his view was somewhat blocked for a few seconds anyway.
And the FBI cut down the tree and removed a lot of the signage
Mr. ED! (An unexpected moment of levity).
Many Americans have researched this to death for 60 years or so -- and found out things are never what they appear to be.
"found out things are never what they appear to be": Here's a perfect example of that: ua-cam.com/video/o0d6LG27hQM/v-deo.html
I loved watching Mr Ed!!
A horse is a horse of course of course
And no one can talk to a horse of course.
That is of course unless the horse
Is the famous Mister Ed!
Go right to the source and ask the horse.
He'll give you the answer that you'll endorse
He's always on a steady course.
Talk to Mister Ed!
People yakkity-yak a streak
And waste your time of day,
but Mister Ed will never speak
Unless he has something to say!
A horse is a horse of course of course
And this one'll talk 'til his voice is hoarse.
You've never heard of a talking horse?
Well, listen to this... 🐎 🗨 🗯 💭 🗨 💬 🐴 💬
"I am Mister Ed!
@@brendonwilhelmi_7251 HAHAHAHAHAHA!!! 🎶 of COURSE, of COURSE!😆 I still know others, to this day, who sing along!! Some great belly laugh memories on that show (driving the truck and Ed puts out left arm to signal the turn!!!) BWAHahahah. The 1st time we saw it, we hit the floor laughing our arses off!!
Ed shorts are on my playlist (remember when Ed hit the pitched ball... and sliiiiiiiding into home base !)
@@brendonwilhelmi_7251 Remember when he went into outer space? Seemed so real!
@@brendonwilhelmi_7251 , pretty appropriate that they interrupted a talking horse with their bullsh*t!!😉
Even Mr. Ed isn't as unbelievable as the Warren Commission Report.
well said .
Warren commission Fraud.
@@MrGibble64 Oh Wilbur.
If it whinnies like a horse then it must be a horse - making a big pile of horse shit.
I feel the same way about Dan Rather
This is amazing. There’s stuff in here that I’d never seen or heard.
There's stuff in here that never happened *
Which makes it hard to have heard or seen.
@@DaveSCameron Please back up your false claims of “ There’s stuff here that never happened *” I am sure you are full of hot air and probably have never read any of the Warren Commission Report but rather you are simply parroting other people’s words!!!
@@wallacebell4311 I'll pass, perhaps you can try being civil with folks if you require conversation..
@@DaveSCameron like what??
And here we sit, 60 years later with STILL NO ANSWERS....
Well, I wouldn't say that. After 60 years of additional research and document releases, it's a glaring certainty at least that the Warren theory was as bogus as it gets.
We have the answers, many choose to ignore, Zionism
And here we sit, 60 years later with STILL NO ANSWERS...": Wow, that's gotta be the laziest and most clueless statement I've ever heard.
I just got into the Marguerite Oswald interview here and it is Pure Gold!! You can't find this stuff anymore!!
Yes you can, it's called the library of congress. You won't find the truth there, but all the paperwork is there.
Like he said he was a patsy. The men who shot Kennedy were professional ruthless and successful.. none of which you could call Oswald .
@@richardhartley4102 Reporter question: "Did you shoot the President?"
Oswald answer: “No, they've taken me in because of the fact that I lived in the Soviet Union...I'm just a patsy!"
It is clear from the context that Oswald is saying that the Dallas authorities are blaming him for the assassination simply because of the fact that he defected to the Soviet Union, and he was a convenient person for them to accuse.
@@woodie6408 Yes of course, as those in your camp are aware, the "truth" can be found only in "The Big Book of Functional Conspiracy Delusions."
He probably was a patsy. Was also probably directly involved in the assassination.
Idk about anyone else but if I was accused of killing the president I would be livid, emphatic, and very direct. When he's asked by the reporter he doesn't go to any length whatsoever to give an unambiguous response, he says "I haven't been charged with that yet...". Not the response of an innocent person
Dan Rather really needs to finally come clean about his reporting from November 1963.
“His head went FORWARD with
considerable violence!”
His meteoric rise from cub reporter to national prime time anchor is amazing.
I wonder why the ARRB didn’t examine him under oath in the 1990s to try to better understand how he reported the exact opposite of what he purportedly saw on the original Zapruder film.
He Would Be.. & totally is Guilty Of. Capital Crimes.. when convicted would be executed.. so don’texpect him to confess to covering up JFKs death.. But he did & is..Whenever he’s asked he said the same thing there is no evidence whatsoever to dispute the Warren commission findings he said it time and time again says all the conspiracy theories are wrong and he can prove it and every time he does he just lays his ass off he’s a scumbag
Yes, Rather is quite talented. A great guy, too.
CBS was part of Operation Mockingbird by the CIA.
Well said …. Well Spoken,,, Benji….
@@ronniebishop2496 at least… what is it. Mokinbird.. bet yer ass they did it.. bunch of fck wads. Don’t you think??? ever. get it??? me either I get NEWSDAY…. I crack myself up… all fkn day..
This is the same Dan Rather who said he saw the Zapruder film and said Kennedy fell forward.
He described what he thought he saw funny thing he was proven to be right.
@@randyharris3175 Wow. So you fell for the suggestion?
Watch it again. That is not the only thing Dan Rather has lied about, either. He was not proven right at all.
Muscle reaction tightening up after brain exploded. Sheep did the same.
@@wtmerit6129 I get that, but watch it again and tell what what way he fell.
Can you do that instead of puking Dan Rather bull crap?
Physics are not on your side on this one. It is obvious that when the shot went through his throat, he leaned forward slightly, but when the shot came from the front, he fell back and to the left. Had he been shot from behind, all the blood and brains would have exploded in front of him.
The fact everything blew out behind means the shot came from the front.
Here is how to remember it, entry wound small, exit wound big.
Were the sheep alive and moving?
@@Matthew-pw3ng Dan rather = total puppet.
I told our local librarian that the Warren Report should be placed in the fiction section.
What did the Warren Commission get wrong?
@@willcollins6956 The other assassins for one thing.You didn't think that the Rothschilds would leave something this important up to chance,did you?
@@rentslave
I don't think Oswald ran with the Rothschields.
"I told our local librarian that the Warren Report should be placed in the fiction section.": Then you told a really stupid joke without even understanding why you said it.
absolutely
Dorothy Kilgallen knew the truth. She was silenced for it.
It's never been proven that her death had anything to do with the JFK assassination, and it has also never been proven that she had any special insight into the assassination.
She was killed because she interviewed Jack Ruby massive coverup the truth will never be known because they eliminated anybody who knew anything
@Wilt Chamberlain is the GOAT But where's the proof that she actually had anything? Also I think you may have the time frame wrong. My recollection is that she claimed that she would break the case wide open soon after she interviewed Jack Ruby in March, 1964, but her death wasn't until November, 1965, so if I'm correct I don't think most people would say "suddenly." She also ran a story in September, 1965 in which she said, "This story isn't going to die as long as there's a real reporter alive---and there are a lot of them." Also, at the time of her death she was working on a book which was to be titled "Murder One." In the publisher's advance advertisement for the book it was said that it was to be a study of the trials she had covered, including those of Sam Sheppardl, Wayne Lonegan, Dr. Bernard Finch, and Bruno Hauptman, but no mention of Jack Ruby. Even if the book was planned to include her coverage of the Ruby trial and it simply wasn't mentioned in the advertisement, it would be curious that she would relegate a major revelation about the JFK assassination to a book which discussed other trials as well. She also, starting long before she died, published quite a few articles in which she merely repeated conspiracy factoids given to her by Mark Lane.
@Wilt Chamberlain is the GOAT "Ruby may have told her for sure who was behind it." Uh-huh. I'm guessing you've never read the majority of Jack Ruby's testimony, correct? If you have, you should be able to tell us all here precisely why he begged Earl Warren to take him to Washington, and exactly who the sinister forces were who were supposedly preventing him from telling the truth in Dallas.
@@josephgeorge7385 "She was killed because she interviewed Jack Ruby." Really now? She interviewed Jack Ruby in March, 1964. She died in November, 1965. Why did "they" wait 20 months to kill her? Why did "they" give her 20 months to blab everything she knew to everyone she knew?
Or maybe she didn't have any "bombshell" about the assassination after all, and only mistakenly thought she did?
No matter what your opinion is on the Warren Commission, this is still a fascinating documentary.
Jesse Curry lied. Oswald asked on film for a lawyer. He was interrogated for hours without being permitted an attorney. The notes of the interrogation were destroyed. Humm what is going on?
Actually, there is a transcript but it was suppressed and sealed for 75 years……
miranda wasn’t around back then .
@@jrbonner5858 but the right to an attorney was.
Chief Curry was too busy hanging out on Airforce 1 watchin LBJ be sworn in.....
Oswald wanted a specific lawyer from NY, John Abt: but Abt wanted nothing to do with him. The president of the Dallas County Bar Association, H. Louis Nichols went to see him and Oswald told him he wanted Abt or a lawyer from the American Civil Liberties Union and didn’t need any help from the bar association to find an attorney. It should also be of interest to know that John Abt spent most of his career as chief counsel to the Communist Party USA.
the biggest calamity this country has ever seen .. explain to me how a CIA director who gets fired by the victim gets to be on the warren commission ? Ill Wait .... Ive waited this long
Right Victor huge cover up Allen Dulles hated Kennedy
It was Lyndon Johnson who picked Earl Warren and either he or Warren picked Allen Dulles I'm guessing. Dulles was such a turd.
By the way, it's a very good chance Roscoe White was the Knoll shooter.
Damn, Dan Rather is blinking a WHOLE lot... wonder why...
"His head went violently FORWARD..." lol
@@josephgeorge7385 I don't recall any solid evidence ever being produced that Dulles hated Kennedy, such as a verbatim quote from a reliable source that Dulles said specifically that he hated Kennedy. What is your source for this claim?
@@Caeruleo Kennedy fired Dulles they say he held a grudge but my thing is Kennedy fired Dulles why was he on the Warren Commission
In March 1965, Jack Ruby stated in a news conference:
"Everything pertaining to what's happening has never come to the surface. The world will never know the true facts of what occurred, my motives. The people who had so much to gain, and had such an ulterior motive for putting me in the position I'm in, will never let the true facts come above board to the world."
The reporter asked, "Are these people in very high positions Jack"".
"Yes", Ruby responded.
That's from the horse's mouth - so no doubt, Mr. Ed would approve!
Now if only the mystery of Jack Ruby's mother's teeth in the Warren Report could be unpacked....
It’s hard to believe you have people still to this day claiming Lee Harvey Oswald shot the cop Lee Harvey Oswald shot the President Lee Harvey Oswald Didn’t shoot anyone ,thank you for your comment at least someone Paid attention excellent quote on Jack Ruby too but He said President Johnson’s at the top of his list.. not in so many words .. but yeah he did
And that’s funny too they took a study the Warren commission that is of Jack Ruby’s mothers teeth now even if Jack Ruby had BITTEN Lee Harvey Oswald to death.. His mothers teeth prints would have nothing to do with it and be of no value so you tell me why they did shit like that and Warren report geez maybe they didn’t want the truth do you think you made some really good points thank you
Ulterior motives is The single THING to UNDERSTAND in general
In 1965 I Said .. and I Quote “ Hay Mom I Want More Bananas in My Frosted Flakes”. She Did.. good times..
Why didn't Ruby ever reveal any of the details about the "true facts" and the "people in very high positions"??? He was arrested, tried for murder, convicted, and sentenced to death, but never revealed any of the deep, dark "facts" through any of that, and continued to not reveal any of it, through his death, January 3rd, 1967. It is a bit puzzling, isn't it, that he knew so much, but never revealed any of it? It is almost like he was talking out of his ass.
When American citizens were more trusting....had no idea they were being duped...and by the time this aired those who felt they were had seen or heard of too many strange deaths. Time always tells... God don't like ugly or evil...
oh yeah, brah .... that blonde babe in CLUELESS had snap, maaaan
The ugly irony is that people were duped by CT people like Mark Lane (Rush to judgement) and Jim Garrison (on the trail of the assassins), who lied thru their teeth to fabricate a conspiracy.
If there is a "God"...he has a lot to answer for!...Why would any caring entity even allow this to happen?
@@curbozerboomer1773can you control all the bugs in your garden on an individual basis? Get to decide which ones kill each other? Being a creator doesn't mean you control your creation, especially if you allow them free will.
yep, he also had ESP to get a job there way before the route was published
And with his qualifications and friends he can't get a better job that moving books at minimum wage?
@@Malcolm.Y Are your parents morons too?
@@Malcolm.Y What qualifications? What friends?
@@jputterman26 Only some of the people who address me on UA-cam are in the moron class.
@@slyjokerg A Marine, with training in electronics and Russian/
This has been a CBS presentation, written and directed by the Warren Commission
Operation Mockingbird. They loved Jack, but they loved $ more.
Well said.
Of course. Walter Cronkite and Dan Rather were puppets of the Warren Commission. Now Dorothy Kilgallen , a CBS employee who's position was a panelist on 'What's My Line' had a talk with Jack Ruby sometime after the assassination. She was going to 'blow the case wide open.' Before she could she died of an 'apparent suicide.' due to excess consumption of barbituates. Back at that time , senator Prescott Bush was on the board of directors of CBS. CBS conducted their own investigation into the assassination---God only knows why. So, connect the dots.
actually mostly the work of Eddie Barker.
What do you have when you put together 100 coincidences? A CONSPIRACY!
@rick4electric: What do you have when you misstate the case so you can get a conspiracy? Things that aren't right: 1) the number 100 2) your math 3) your logic..
What do you have when you have 100 co-conspirators planted all over town, each fully confident they can successfully get their hands on and undetectably alter every film of the assassination, successfully falsify all the medical and ballistics evidence, and succeed in outfoxing the entire legitimate law enforcement community every step of the way, each relying on luck, split-second timing, and praying to God that no random element, unpredictable witness, unanticipated complication or co-conspirator cracks or screws up, co-conspirators now obliged to spend the rest of their lives threatening and intimidating countless witnesses to never come forward and admit they were in danger if they didn't lie their asses off to the nation for 58 years? A flippin' MIRACLE.
@@aaronz7056 A plan?
And your point. How about 100 facts that the conspiracy nuts ignore.
@@baxterscruggs1716 Let's not give the "nuts" too much credit. The facts they ignore easily number more than 100...
1:42 min even Dan finds it hard to believe Oswald learned Russian all on this own during his time in the Marines.
Russian is an extremely hard language to learn, but even harder to learn to speak and pronounce if you’re a native English speaker. The consonant clusters and unique vowels can’t be heard by many people since their ears aren’t attenuated to those sounds. Marina said she thought he was a native speaker when she met him in Belorussia. That is very odd. It means he received very professional language immersion training. Where would he have obtained that? We have no record of him attending DLI. USMC cohorts of his said he was studying Russian and reading books in Russian. That wouldn’t explain his pronunciation and conversational skills.
@@LRRPFco52 I recommend that you read "Harvey and Lee" by John Armstrong and watch some of his videos. (btw, Harvey and Lee pdf is available, free online.)
Where and how he learned Russian has absolutely nothing to do with the fact he took a rifle to work, shot the president and then fled the scene. Nothing.
@@kevinjones8929 sure keep moving along nothing to see here, Good Citizen.
@@kevinjones8929 You are entitled to your own opinion and beliefs. However, that being said, after looking at all the known evidence, you may be a person that just cannot handle the truth or..... you cannot be awakened because you are pretending to be asleep.
This is astonishing. Raises issues with the report about to drop live then Boom! Warren gives these answers and goodnight. It comes across as Warren PR to a viewer today.
It comes across as Warren PR to a viewer today.": Well of course it would come across that way to you!
Wondering was Dan complicit or had a gun to his head to do this ....
To go against the prestige of the US government at the height of the Cold War would have been unconscionable. Since all these journalists loved JFK, they probably preferred the lone nutjob theory anyway. Also, what real proof did they have to the contrary?
They would have been quite happy to report on arrests, trials and convictions of the conspirators should that have happened.
The warren report , a report that had the story all sorted before they started . After all these years that have past since the report , many people have researched almost everything about the three Murders that weekend in Dallas , interviewed all the people who came forward that day and this is what makes the WC floored , for them if they the witnesses didn’t fit there narrative of the lone nut they didn’t get a voice that day , the job of the WC was to collect only the evidence that would pin the assassination on LHO , the Dallas police dept played there part , fixers planted evidence and in the minutes following that final fatal shot , the cover up and the set up of LHO the patsy was in full swing , once Oswald was eliminated by Jack Ruby (not to save Jackie from a trial , but on the orders of his pay chiefs the Mafia) the investigation of the murder of a fellow police officer Stop dead like a stone ( the evidence against Oswald for killing Tippett was poor at best ) 60 years have past and with everything that has come out over these the passing years documents and the like , show the WC for what it is ….
No, it was just what the commission concluded based on its good investigation. The evidence against Oswald is overwhelming, but conspiracy buffs simply ignore it.
Oswald mother is so insightful "A Russian girl any foreign girl, a negro just any human beings, lives and breathe just as I do" All I see is a mother who loves her son and wanted him to be happy.
I respect his mother very intelligent
@@josephgeorge7385 She was almost as kooky as her son.
@@aaronz7056 Kooky - no. She said that some people in the State Department were behind the conspiracy....she knew what was kookin’.
@@lebeautymarq8834 You're joking, right?
@@aaronz7056 You’re just being kooky, right?
Gotta love how they chose all the witnesses that went along with the narrative. Not anyone with alternate viewpoints which was a thing from the beginning.
Paranoia. Oswald did this and he was the man who just shrugged a hollow, rambling reply that all but dodges the question when asked on live TV, "Did you shoot the President?"...
@@aaronz7056 okay Dick Tracy
Definitely involved, but not the only one.
@@klenmcrock5265 That's a brilliant witticism, I assume you use that on anybody who's not on board for this crackpot conspiracy nonsense?
@@aaronz7056 there's no way on mother earth that one dude pulled this off. The evidence to the contrary is greater than the tow the line narrative. You're telling me you don't see any inconsistencies at all? Don't be a clown.
This was the first bogus whitewashing of this murder. Note that one of the members, Allen Dulles, was dismissed by Kennedy. ..."On November 29, 1963, President Lyndon Baines Johnson appointed Dulles as one of seven commissioners of the Warren Commission to investigate the assassination of the U.S. President John F. Kennedy. The appointment was later criticized by some historians, who have noted that Kennedy had fired him, and he was therefore unlikely to be impartial in passing the judgments charged to the Warren Commission. In the view of journalist and author Stephen Kinzer, Johnson appointed Dulles primarily so that Dulles could "coach" the Commission on how to interview CIA witnesses and what questions to ask, because Johnson and Dulles were both anxious to ensure that the Commission did not discover Kennedy's secret involvement in the administration's illegal plans to assassinate Castro and other foreign leaders.[41]..."
@QuantumRift.... Not only were both LBJ and Allen Dulles anxious to ensure the Commission didn’t discover the secret plans to assassinate Fidel Castro, but it was more imperative to keep it a secret because Lee Oswald was a participant in a get Castro plot...There were Cuban Contingency Plans in place that would ensure the assassination could remain secret even before the assassination happened...when you have people like William King Harvey running the “Executive Action” program in America - a person who despised Kennedy - the assassination was inevitable
very good
But it was Walter Conkrite! Eveyrone accepted that if Walter Conkrite said it was so, it was the truth; According to the government. And the News.
Also fired by President Kennedy, was CIA Charles Cabell, who's brother was Earl Cabell, MAYOR OF DALLAS IN 1963.
Also fired by President Kennedy, was CIA Charles Cabell, who's brother was Earl Cabell, MAYOR OF DALLAS IN 1963.
The Government will never let the truth come out!
Why would the government keep such incriminating docs - that would be so detrimental to them - in the first place? Or if they existed, why not destroy them long ago?
The truth is that it was Oswald, the secret files contain details of foul ups but not concerning any doubt of Oswald’s guilt.
Here we go..."Da Govmint" done did it!...yup, yup,yup!...idiots!
the government has let all the truth out that it knows and can safely reveal. Anything hidden is not a cover-up of what happened, and has been reviewed.
Think what you will about its overall premise, this remains, due to its assemblage of interviews, the most valuable single production by a 1960s U.S. network regarding JFK's murder. Several people in this broadcast weren't interviewed too often, if at all, thereafter. While others who appear remained talking-head staples for decades and this would be among their first filmed renditions.
After Warren Report was issued, all U.S. networks supported its conclusions to the hilt. But at this moment--when the reporters had recently seen the official version, but the public hadn't, and their interviews had already been filmed--CBS allowed itself final flickers of journalism before network objectivity on the subject (and maybe a few others) was extinguished.
And Walter's introduction, as if narrating a Movie of the Week trailer, is a classic: "The Wife...The Mother...The Best Friend..."
Guess you know about the CIA Mockingbird media project and that most famous quote about it?
But the police have footage of Dinsdale actually nailing your head to the floor.
I totally this is the best coverage better than Mark Lane
@@josephgeorge7385 Mark Lane's middle names could have been "Leading Witnesses." Somehow, a guy who was Jim Jones' right hand man, who made no attempt to warn off Leo Ryan from the death trap he was walking into at Jonestown, and who thus has blood all over his hands, doesn't strike me as a man with boundless credibility.
@@aaronz7056 This is just like you trying to link Oswald with the moon men.
Poor Mr Ed was cancelled, I can’t believe there wasn’t a public outcry.
I was thinking the same thing when this came on 😂😂😂 a horse is horse of course of course
@@johnbaugh2437 😆
mr.ed is better than any show today
The Mr Ed show was one of my favorites!
Sadly mr. Ed is more believable than this garbage
If Oswald actually took a package of curtain rods to work on the morning of 11/22 why were the curtain rods STILL in Ruth Paine's garage ?
If Oswald didn't take his rifle to work on the morning of 11/22 then why wasn't it in the blanket in Ruth Paine's garage (where he kept it) when the FBI searched there on the afternoon of the 22nd ?
This is sad that we find out that the newscasters we trusted were involved in making it appear that Oswald was guilty when clearly he wasn't. Example. A witness Howard Brennan saw the shooter on the six floor shoot then took time to observe if he hit his target. But the newscasters said Oswald could have shot then quickly run down the stairs to be found in the lunch room. Since the shooter took time and Oswald was found in a less than a minute and a half, the shooter could not be Oswald. The witnesses who saw the shooter who killed officer Tippet said he fired five times. But the gun Oswald owned had a broken firing pin and could not fire. The cop who said his thumb blocked the hammer of Oswald's gun was wrong. The shells found that had killed Tippet were from an automatic. Oswald had a revolver. Thus Oswald's gun did not kill Tippet. Other witnesses said the shooter had a partner and was not Oswald. The guy who picked Oswald in the line up had several choices. But all but Oswald were dressed in suits and the witness was told that the suspect was just arrested. Officer Curry said Oswald was given all his civil rights. Officer Lewis said Oswald never asked for a lawyer. But film shows Oswald asking for one. Thus the cop lied. Oswald never got an attorney. All the notes of Oswald's interrgation were burned. Why? His thumb print on the rifle was not there the first time they printed it. It was found only after Oswald was dead. The cops originally found a different rifle then the one bought by Oswald. Both Cronkite and Rather report all the shots came from the sixth floor but 80% of the witnesses including 20 plus cops said a shot came from the grassy knoll. Oswald was set up. Cronkite said nine people said Oswald was at the scene of the death of Tippet. That info was flat false.. Mrs Markham gave several different reports. Anther witness who was the closest who saw the shooting said it was not Oswald. She has disappeared, the package that Cronkite said was the rifle could not have been. More fake news. Etc etc, Cronkite and Rather parroted the Warren Report, There now is a mountain of evidence which proves Oswald was not the shooter but there were multiple shooters.
You sound like the scriptwriter for Oliver Stone. Like you, he created his own fantasy of what happened. It was the unanimous testimony of expert witnesses before the Warren Commission that the spent cartridge cases were fired from the revolver in Oswald's possession to the exclusion of all other weapons.
You forgot to mention the part about gun smoke being seen near fence on the grassy knoll. There was also a man who was stopped by a cop behind the fence with a secret service badge and dirty fingernails who for some reason was standing behind the fence and then told the cop to clear the area. The secret service said there was no such man that worked for them in the area that day. So who was this man and what was he doing ? Witnesses also saw this man standing near the fence prior to the shooting just hanging around.
@@samgambino9695 Saying it was clearly "gun smoke" is not accurate. Two of the witnesses said they thought it was exhaust fumes, as from a car or motorcycle. Interestingly, when Oliver Stone was making his full of lies movie about the assassination, a number of rifles were trotted out, none of which emitted any smoke (well maintained modern rifles don't produce smoke). The smoke had to be generated using special effects.
@@robertromero8692 what about the man who claimed to be a secret service agent ? Was he made up too ? With the dirty fingernails ? You seem to have missed that part.
@@robertromero8692 Who were the men in Dealey Plaza dressed as Secret Service agents? Who was the man that impersonated LHO in Mexico City in Oct 1963? Why was the autopsy evidence twisted around? Why did the HSCA move the head shot up about 4 inches? Why did the HSCA admit that someone was rearranging boxes by the sniper's nest minutes after the final shot, when LHO was on the 2nd floor face to face with DPD officer Baker? Why didn't the coworkers at the TSBD see LHO flying down the stairs?
Wow, seeing undeveloped Dallas is weird.
60 years later it is still informative, conflicting , contradictory, and confusing.
THE TRUTH IS AS PLAIN AS DAYLIGHT
It's conflicting, contradictory, and confusing only if you ignore the evidence and listen to those who have no evidence, just stories for profit.
Sound familiar?
Listening to this level of B.S., is amazing they pulled it off.
no. people swallow bullshit like it's sustenance. If we could stop that from happening we could start reaching our potential for good things.
oh c'mon, what do you know about it?
@@peterfraser9070 he perhaps realizes that the only way to get away clean with a thing like that is if you are the international bankers and thus direct the CIA, Mossad, et cetera. You're the only one here who seems to extract his cabeza from his high-knee to speak.
@@peterfraser9070 I know his brain was stolen, I know Ruby shot Oswald on TV, I know dozens of witnesses turned up dead, I know after Nov 63, we get mass shootings, mass cult activity, mass war, and that's all I need to know about it.
@@lebergerdesphotons4565 Wow, you're so intellectual
Lee Harvey Oswald,asked for legal representation six times,during the time he was in police custody.How come he was Not afforded an attorney? The man,who supposedly came from some" legal organization" asked him if he wanted a lawyer?" What on earth was Jack Ruby doing there,after Oswald was being" paraded" up and down the corridor of the police st.? How is it,that Lee Harvey Oswald was taken a couple more times in front of All those reporters,when this Is the person,who was allegedly accused of shooting President Kennedy? I would think the police dept.would have kept Oswald away from All those people!
Not true he was offered an attorney even got a visit from a man name Nichols who went on his jail cell and asked him.do you want an attorney he said no.He was assisting on this Abt guy so that is a myth.
@Nancy Sanders-No legitimate Law Enforcement Department would allow any civilians to be present when a suspect or detainee was being transported To say that Jack Ruby was allowed in the basement because he was "friendly" and known by some of the officers is another lie perpetuated by the Warren Commission.
@@jerrybrownell3633 Show me where the WC said that?It was happenstance and just plain luck.
@@jerrybrownell3633 if you know the case you woukdnt have to make comments like that .He was being presented to show he has not been mistreated.
@@randyharris3175 - And please tell us what that had to do with Jack Ruby being there.
He was not a member of The Press. Show me where The Warren Commission said it
was perfectly normal for a civilian( Jack Ruby ) with a gun to be in that position.
I had a near death experience. I saw god and said, “I always wanted to know who killed Kennedy”. god said to me “it was Oswald”. I turned to the guy behind me in line and said this is deeper than I thought.
"I had a near death experience. I saw god and said, “I always wanted to know who killed Kennedy”": Good point. This would apply to CT people. No matter what, they're gonna believe what they want to believe.
😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅
Best sign of coverup: At about 1:50 the WC is quoted as saying nobody at the overpass thought any shots had been fired from the front. But MULTIPLE people testified they had heard shot from the stockade fence and seen smoke, and MOST witnesses said they had heard shots from BOTH front and rear. If a report simply denies this, it's a lie. Cf. Josiah Thompson's 1967 and 2021 books on this case.
Even simpler, you’re either naïve enough to think ruby was just crazy or you’re not.
Had they held the limo for evidence they'd found shots came in from both the front and back and the head shot coming from the drain hole on the road with the blood shooting straight up and to the back. Kennedy out of the way they can make Vietnam a full blown war for the makers of war machines the oil men of Texas and steel mills. War is good for business never mind who gets killed just as long as they sell thier products. They are the puppeteers.
Robert... Hence the proverb "Never believe anything until the government denies it."
@@alexsegurasr3028 exactly!
Spot on. The biggest conundrum is that a shooter in that 6th floor window would have taken the easy shot on Houston with the limo headed directly at him before turning on Elm.
Bill Hicks said how realistic the assassination museum is because when you go to the place where Oswald was supposed to be, he wasn't there just like he wasn't at the moment of the assassination.
Who says Oswald wasn't at the 6th floor window during the assassination? How bizarre. So Oswald let a look-alike use the rifle that he brought - his rifle - and this look-alike somehow managed to leave Oswald's prints? Wow. Bizarre.
@@peterfraser9070 I think "peter fraser" is a mind controlled doofus with the far-fetched idea that he thinks for himself.
@@lebergerdesphotons4565 And you think for yourself, just believing these crazy stories by highly unreliable sources?
@@peterfraser9070 You give yourself away as a victim of the most common logical fallacy to which humans fall victim. The appeal to authority. You are looking for "reliable sources" rather than logically coherent sequences.
@@lebergerdesphotons4565 What are the logically coherent sequences in this case?
I can hardly stomach Dan Rather...oh how I wish anyone but him had seen the Zapruder film before the feds got it...
"I can hardly stomach Dan Rather...oh how I wish anyone but him had seen the Zapruder film before the feds got it...": I can hardly stomach someone with your attitude, frankly. I know how much importance you attach to my opinion, so I just thought I'd let you know. 😉
We're NEVER going to learn the truth behind what happened that day.
absolutely correct !!!
Here’s the truth, it was Oswald with the Carcano on the Sixth floor, it was Oswald with the .38, hope that helps
@@BobK5 You would have to be the most gullible idiot to believe Oswald Acted Alone.
@@vernpascal1531 yes you’d have to be really very gullible to believe that Oswald took his M38 Carcano to work disguised as curtain rods after hearing that the motorcade was going to pass by his window and having already attempted at least one other assassination and believe he didn’t use it. You’d have to be really gullible to believe that he was acting alone on the overwhelming evidence that no other gunmen were seen, no other shots were fired, no other shells were recovered except those from Oswald’s rifle in the TSBD.
What do you think Oswald took his own mail order rifle to work for?
The truth is Vern you’ve got to be a complete fantasist to join up dots where they don’t exist, your gullibility is what Oswald, the violent liar, the repeated wife beating self proclaimed Marxist, the fluent Russian speaker, the Cuban agitator from Russia with love, the attempted assassin and then imagine for the sake of convenience that anyone in their right mind would want to work with that ego inflated self important fruitcake in any plot.
Do you have any evidence that Oswald was not alone, other than with his wife?
it was kalanag, the invisible man
If ever there was a cover-up, this was it. LBJ was implicated in the assassination
and eyewitness testimony from MR ED proves it
He was an animal and psychopath.
@@LibertyStation92106 He was also a thief. Born a thief. Died a thief
I remember the assassination and this time very clearly, but I was only 8 then. I don't remember this report and realize it would have been hard for me to understand the implications of the broadcast or the Warren Report. Looking at it now 58 years later, I realize it was a much more innocent/naive time for the people of the US. Mr. Cronkite and Mr. Rather both keep saying the questions will be answered by the Warren Report being released a few minutes later. It was a time when we though collectively that our government would always tell us the truth. We know better now.
So many lies to hide this coup even though the truth was evident and clearly stated in this broadcast. A marine taught Russian by the US government, got a loan from the US government to help him return to the US from Russia, got his passport within a day, testimony from his mother, files from observations, surveillance and face to face encounters with the Oswald family by the FBI and CIA prior to the assassination (they new all about him, but had no concern expressed to local authorities for him working on the parade route of the President), met with the person overseeing assassinations at the Russian Embassy in Mexico October 8 and involved in the murder of a US President 5 weeks later--all of this by a poor guy working a temp job for $1.50 an hour?
LH Oswald clearly had the support of the CIA and probably others. FBI Chief Hoover was a scum who was completely capable of something like the murder of Kennedy. Doesn't look like the people of the US have learned much. Since then, murders like this have become just part of business as usual and has changed the direction of the country.
In your 60s and you're an Ignorant Conspiracy Clown. How does one reach such an age and be as Stupid as you are?
Bingo
All men lie, even those in government.
There was so much fabricated stories created by forces within the government circles.The American people today are not fools and can see the true facts on the assassination.
The problem is that many people are still gullible and believe everything they hear - they've just transferred their faith from government to dishonest conspiracy authors.
13:28 Dan Rather says Oswald signed his FPfCC membership card with an alias, but we can clearly see he did not!!!!
On this particular story, Dan Rather has always been full of shit. Shame on you Dan Rather, you know better. What is it that you were so afraid of? You did not do your job.
I could take a guess at what he was afraid of. That he might not get a good national gig as a reporter that was well-paid.
@@timhuwe5953 Tim, you are right. Same with Cronkite.
The thing Dan Rather also lied about the Zapruder film
The alias reads A J Hidell Chapter President. Rather is not wrong.
Well this all appears to be in fine order so we can all go home now...
Only home would never be the same. The day this country lost its innocence.
Complete whitewash .
Almost certainly!
Complete idiot......(you)
You would have to have the Brain Power of less than a Chimpanzee to believe Oswald did this on his own. Of course that's Collins,Vaughn,Mauldsley,Nickerson etc.
@@vernpascal1531 Or, an alternate (and perhaps more plausible explanation): you would have to actually *read* the majority of the testimony of the Dealey Plaza witnesses to see quite plainly that there was obviously only a single gunman. That alone doesn't prove that gunman was Oswald, of course, but without a second gunman conspiracy instantly becomes several orders of magnitude more difficult to demonstrate.
Why did Oswald, if he was innocent, pull a gun on the police officer inside the Texas Theatre ?
The officer simply asked him to stand up. Why did Oswald say "It's all over now" and pull his gun ?
Did Oswald think he was being arrested for not purchasing his theatre ticket ? Why did Oswald use deadly force to defend himself from a cop who was arresting him for not buying a ticket ? What's up with that ?
Nearly six decades later, millions of people still doubt that Oswald acted alone.
Many don't even think he did the shooting. Now that's really bizarre considering the evidence, but then again, they don't care about the truth, they're just in love with conspiracy stories.
thats because we have a race of baboons who should not be allowed to vote and sent to the adjustment class and learn how to read and write
Ignorance and Hollywood. People just don’t know the facts and mountains of evidence against Oswald because its been muddied over with 60 years on conspiracy nonsense. That’s why it’s great the dpd took a lot of eyewitness testimony in the days after, because now we can see who has changed their stories after lane’s book and others come out that flooded their head with conspiracies. ie. Hill. They don’t claim they see nothing out of the ordinary in the days after, but years later, after the books came out, now they see a shooter on the grassy knoll, a puff of smoke or something. And the second thing is purely fictional Hollywood movies like JFK. With nothing but conspiracy theories parading around as fact. And also people watch too many movies and think that stuff can happen in real life, like a bunch of cia Jason bournes pulled this off.
Watch JFK to 9/11 a Richman's trick
@@SaadKhan-og9pp No thanks.
One question I’ve never heard answered is, if Oswald was really bringing curtain rods into the building, and not a rifle, were the curtain rods ever found? Anyone know?
They were given to his mistress?
No curtain rods were ever found in the Depository.
@@Caeruleo humm so?
Oswald's room had curtains. No curtain rods were ever in Oswald's possession; he brought his rifle to work, partially disassembled I believe, nicely wrapped in brownish paper. He used the rifle to slay Kennedy. The circumstances at the TBD were odd in that they were restoring or replacing flooring at the level Oswald fired from- so stacks of books were all pushed to one side, inadvertently creating a convenient wall for Oswald to work behind. Like most assassins, Oswald was a nut job; and in his case a political nut job. The boy left the USA to immigrate to the USSR! OY VEY! NOBODY but a nut job does that! The folks in Russia, who didn't quite know what to make of him wanted to ask him, "your what hurts?"
@@bobdecarlo7778 yea yea you can parrot the lone gunmen nut jobs. But Buel Fraiser who drove him to work said Oswald did not have a rifle. End of story.
I cant go through all these comments but after about 50 i realize...my comment is basically what they said
It's fascinating to me that at just 37 seconds into this report, we can see the view from the snipers nest, and how the traffic sign momentarily comes into view in front of the occupants of the car. The current thinking is that Oswald's first shot hit that sign and ricocheted into the kerb causing injury to James Tague. But nobody seems to have realised that at the time.
The fragment that caused an injury to Tague more than likely came from the 3rd and fatal headshot. At the time of the headshot, Tague and the limo were almost in a straight line to the depository and fragments from the headshot hit and damaged the windshield and the chrome above it (also lining up with Tague's position). Tague himself said he wasn't hit by the first shot which is the shot that missed the car.
What a highly deceptive and lying person Oswald was. Too many people like that and they are dangerous.
Dan Rather the guy that said JFK flew forward with the headshot after watching the Zapruder film. And he's been lying ever since.
He did go forward,2.25 inches forward then snapped back,kind of what happens when half your head is blown off from a shot from behind…
@@shanet5604 that's not what Dan said
Dan Rather the guy that said JFK flew forward with the headshot after watching the Zapruder film. And he's been lying ever since": ua-cam.com/video/o0d6LG27hQM/v-deo.html
He was right about going forward. Crowd witness clearly stated last 2 shots was bang bang..2 shots. .. 1st hits him in back. Then less then a full second later he is pushed back hard an piece of his scalp an blood go back some of it lands on motorcycle cop just behind Limmo when for who knows why driver slowed way down. . Super slow motion an play stop it's on Zapruder film.
@@davidwilliams4498 It's been proven a couple of those frames were mixed up to make it look that way.
Very interesting film which, if viewed (and listened to ) carefully contradicts the Warren Commission on numerous occasions. For example, at 47:00, the 'dot' on the back of the "President" indicates where he was shot- and this is the bullet that, according to the Warren Commission, then manages to come out from the President's neck, just above his shirt collar. Only problem is that the shots were, according to the Warren Commission, all coming from the sixth floor of the TSBD building. Only possible if the shooter was in the boot of the car and shot through the back seat...shooting upwards ofcourse....
I guess they never found the curtain rods. And there was chicken that had been eaten in the building where did he get chicken?
Computer analysis and medical analysis shows very clearly the bullet's trajectory and all the wounds suffered by the victims line up perfectly with Oswald's window. Don't forget the limo was travelling on a downhill grade as well.
@@aaronz7056 The conspirators stole the brain because they didn't want traces of mercury from the mercury loaded exploding bullet to be discovered on it!
Clint Hill burned all his blood stained clothing.
Jackie's pink suit is locked away for a gazillion years.
Must be the mercury, man!
@@lebeautymarq8834 Must be the weed, man!
@@aaronz7056 It must be the coke when you start believing in magic bullets, disappearing shotguns, exploding heads that reappear whole again in photographs....yeah, you’d have to be off your head to believe in the Warren magic show!
IF Oswald had co-conspirators then why didn't they plan his escape ? His escape plan was to walk out the front door and get on a bus. Why wasn't there a "get away" car waiting for him after the shooting ?
Nothing to see here folks.
Keep moving…do as you’re told.
Oswald was the lone assassin. I have been to that window. I walked that street. It was an easy hit. No second gunman was involved. The first shot that hit Kennedy in the neck, was done from behind. It was so close from where Oswald was, that someone with a BB gun could have done it. Anyone from the picket fence was out of range. The fatal shot was a bit further away, but still a close and clear shot. There could not have been a second gunman from behind the picket fence, because there was no getaway. That area was surrounded by railroad tracks except for two small roads that would have led to the Texas School Book Depository building. That area was sealed off because of the motorcade. After shots were fired, well, no one was getting out. No one fired from a sewer and the driver certainly did not do it. Come on! Oswald did it. The Warren Commission got it right.
Yep, correct on all points.
Yes, you got it right.
@GeorgeVreelandHill You have concurred (correctly it must be said) with the Warren Commission and the HSCA (after their 4th shot theory was discredited).
Your full of crap
Why didn't Oswald just buy a ticket when he got to the Texas Theatre ?
I he was (allegedly) meeting someone there, was his instructions to "enter the theatre, but don't buy a ticket"? That's just stupid. Who would believe such a story ?
"TRUST NO GOVERNMENT," ----Thomas Jefferson
"It's the duty of every citizen to question authority".
- Benjamin Franklin
Don't trust jokers who write books with titles like "Mortal Error", to cash in on the JFK bandwagon either.
@@peterfraser9070 cash in on the bandwagon?
@@alwagner9722 It means you need to look objectively at available facts and evidence and question alternative sources - the ones that vilify what they disparagingly call "official versions", meanwhile offering dishonest versions of their own.
@@peterfraser9070 looking at the facts and evidence objectively should work both ways. For researchers and those who accept only the official report.
I'm a natural born skeptic. I question everything, including alternate conspiracy theories. I also question the official version. After researching everything from the Central Bank to JFK , Gulf of Tonkin incident, USS Liberty attack, OKC bombing and 9/11, I absolutely do not trust anything that comes out of the mouth of a US politician.
You may be patriotic, maybe a vet,whatever, the thing is, do you not question anything about the Warren Report? You discount every aspect of all the different conspiracy theories surrounding the assassination? It's called objectivity..right? Look at the Commission staff. All DC insiders and one Allen Dulles. My opinion of politicians - I like to refer to them as DC swamp creatures, dictates: DO NOT TRUST THEM.
When one looks at the big picture..not just JFK...and realizes the dubious nature of the US government, from 1913 to 9/11/01, it's like a lifting of the veil. And with the corporate owned Mockingbird media, well...they've got everything and everyone (the dumbed down) American public, under control.
Cheers!
Oswalds mother says that she believes he was an agent in Russia and that he was ordered to go to Russia and marry his Russian wife. I think she said that because she actually had knowledge of these things from Lee. I’m not sure why she chose to say that she believed those things, instead of saying she knew
Maybe she said those things because she was crazy...
She didnt know nothing .She tried saying that to Robert Oswald and he told her now mommy shut up.
Really you don't know why she said that?
She was just as delusional and whacked as her son.
Oswald's brother Robert worked for the CIA. Humm what is going on?
Who would put together a list of all the obvious questions that the American people had concerning the assassination and then debunk it instead of investigate it?
They investigated and debunked a lot of illogical conspiracy theories.
@@aaronz7056 You are quite correct. The true conspiracy has long since been proven! Facts are stubborn things as John Adams once said.
@@lebeautymarq8834 No it hasn't.
@@aaronz7056 It has - what may confuse and mislead some people is that Lee Harvey Oswald was never actually convicted of murder. In fact, it has never been proven in any court exactly who killed JFK. His murder is officially unsolved to this day!
Any time the assassination got near a court, juries consistently reached the conclusion that there was a conspiracy.
Even the United States House of Representatives Select Committee on Assassinations (HSCA) concluded that there was a conspiracy.
Public opinion has always been that there was a conspiracy too.
@@aaronz7056 that's a capital argument, did you come up with that yourself?
If you muddy the water, it makes it impossible to see the truth .
They didn’t know at the time, but what a crock of you know what!
Official history all produced and wrapped up with a bow on it. They could make a truth out of whatever they wanted it to be.
Well said ....shiny bow!
Official “government” history. Do you trust the government today?
Very simple cause on Oswald killing Tippit anybody arguing otherwise is delusional.
@@justanotherperson584 ie was wrapped up in a bow because it was so damn obvious.
@@lukewarme9121 it's not government history its eyewitness testimony.
I'd like to hear what a modern day "body language" expert makes of the testimonies of the people being interviewed!
The minute most of them start to speak they look down and away from the camera lense, not wanting to look the camera in the eye!
"I'd like to hear what a modern day "body language" expert makes of the testimonies of the people being interviewed!": Here's an analysis of Oswald: "Lee Harvey Oswald: Rare Footage Body Language Analysis".
Please dude, there's already plenty of theories about this hole JFK assassination... Let's not bring pseudoscience into it now.
It would be as close as saying that aliens were involved.
Why bring in junk science?
@@isabellaangeline2175 This is rather interesting: ua-cam.com/video/46upt4b5aVA/v-deo.html
"body language expert" like CARDI C or WHOOTI GOLDBENZ
How come all those people Oswald claimed he had lunch with on 11/22 all said that they didn't have lunch with Oswald ? Why did Oswald lie about who he ate his lunch with ? Why would he do that if he was innocent ?
They need him to he the only one. Oswald who was a radar operator asked to have an early discharge, it was granted by the marines, he left for Europe. While in Europe he defected to the USSR and denounced the USA and surrendered his passport to the US embassy in Moscow. The State department, FBI can CIA were notified of his actions at the height of the cold war. How did he get passports for himself and his family? Who authorized the passports? if you start at this point in time we will find all the connections to the government we need to know it was a conspiracy.
"They need him to he the only one.": I used to believe the Warren Report was bs only because I'd heard that it was. That, plus 'back and to the left' and stories of suspicious goings on going on behind the picket fence made me think, "Isn't there something to all that? Did Oswald really do it??" Then I saw the film of the actual witnesses talking and realized how "JFK" and other CT sources distorted the witnesses own words. I looked at the Z Film and realized, hey, his head explodes and stuff flies forward, after that, his upper-body jerks back. He wasn't knocked back by a bullet. Then looking at frames 312 to 314 I could see he'd been knocked forward first. These silly notions of a massive conspiracy just evaporated. It was like when I was a kid and realized, hey, how could there really be a Santa Claus who flies around the world in one night and delivers presents to everyone. It was like waking up from a dream and soon realizing, oh, of course, that was only a dream. There isn't really an elephant in the next room.
Who could get a yank into Russian in 60 ? End of the debate
George De Mohrenchildt whom he met in Japan, an old OSS working on U2. He was not trusted enough to be CIA. He was a geologist in the oil, he was Oswald's "best friend" introduced him to Ruth and Michael Paine, who feed, housed, helped with every need including diapers and clothes for the baby and new baby, and kept his wife, wife to Michael who trained helicopter pilots in Cuba. Michael Paine took Oswald on many errands, to dinner parties by the " White Russians" headquartered in Dallas. Maybe to General Walker's house. Oswald went to George M's hometown Minsk in Russia which is Belarus now. and was introduced around by him through references and helped with learning Russian and friends that helped Oswald.
@mike .D
Oswald's defection to the Soviet Union at the height of the Cold War only testifies to his kooky and unstable character, not to any conspiracy.
@@apointofinterest8574 how do you know this?? He was being used, he wanted to be a spy! Height of the Cold War, we just had missiles pointed at us, the country was on high alert school, towns were practicing to run to fall out shelters! Scary times!
@@shernitadee The Soviets, apprehending his neurotic, unstable character, and ascertaining how little he knew about the U2, never took Oswald nor his spy ambitions seriously. Thus, Lee's hopes of playing James Bond came to an abrupt end. Oswald's reaction to this disappointment, as well as to failing to become a Soviet citizen, and also being threatened with deportation? He tries to commit suicide by slitting his wrist. Some spy....
@@apointofinterest8574 the Russians sure shot down our U2 while Oswald was in Russia. He played both sides.
Oswald's mother is clearly articulate, honest and intelligent. If only the same could be said about those who think her son assassinated JFK.
So you believe he killed Kennedy by himself 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
@@TheShahofBaltimore I don't believe he was alone. He was used.
@@kathyhantge964 yes he was! I believe soo too…I’ve been an avid researcher for over 10 years and my final decision is there was an Oswald doppelganger just like Vince Palamara believes
@@kathyhantge964 check out Vince on UA-cam just Google or UA-cam his name his channel is ALL JFK STUFF ITS AMAZING
@@TheShahofBaltimore they showed him on one of these videos. He was the ex-husband of the lady who boarded his wife I believe.
If someone else's gun was planted in the TSBD on 11/22 then why wasn't Oswald's rifle found still wrapped in a blanket in Ruth Paine's garage ?
22 November 1963 was a day full of Paine with never a Dulles moment.
U$A's old Johnson was Ruby red from the suction of a Hoover. All involved are burning in Hell .
"22 November 1963 was a day full of Paine with never a Dulles moment.": GROOOOAN!
My sister was 18 and I was 14. We were celebrating our birthday. It came as a surprise and eventually a shock because it was the first time we had seen an assassination. Radio/TV stations eventually went silent in respect for President Kennedy💔😢
@@peterfraser9070 You reacted to that comment ten months after it was posted ‘Peter Fraser’ 😂😂😂
@@lebeautymarq8834 Ah 'Le Beauty Marq', you're one of those guys who just says the stupidest paranoid conspiracy sh%t ever. Have a nice paranoid life.
What’s wild about this is the timing of the release of this special, which is before the Warren Commission Report was released to the public. Cronkite says the program was airing on the day of, hours before the public release of the Report. So these interviews represent a small slice of history that takes place after the assassination and before the release of the Report. We can immediately see how witnesses were openly talking about things that (unbeknownst to them) would end up either being entirely omitted from, or contradicted by the Report.
Since the Report was mainstreamed and officialized by virtually every major institution in America, the accounts of these witnesses were essentially lost to history. I was stunned when I heard LHO’s mother, for instance, openly stating that her son was sent to Russia and was very clearly a US govt agent. I was similarly intrigued by how seriously and directly mainstream reporters like Dan Rather were openly pondering whether or not LHO was affiliated with the CIA, given that a few decades later it would not be acceptable for a mainstream media figure to express this publicly. I’m fascinated by how these were apparently serious opinions and perceptions explicitly held by these people up until the moment the Warren Report was released.
From that point onward, all of this got memory-holed, and those of us born well after these moments grew up in a historical, political, and cultural environment that considered the very same ideas expressed by these witnesses to be “crazy conspiracy theories”. This is a testimony to the powerful effect that the Warren Report had on shaping the future telling of history. Moreover, laid bare in this video is evidence of the effectiveness of the information warfare operation that was waged on the American public by deep state actors in the decades to come, and how their efforts were aided and abetted by a corporate media landscape that was fully compromised by the military/state security apparatus.
LHO mom's testimony in this program threw me for a loop as well. She stated very clearly that she didn't think he was a govt. agent but KNEW he was due to several corespondents she herself had with other agents... I am not even through the whole thing yet but the Tippit murder on a personal level becomes more and more interesting and baffling as time goes on. Many things said here did not make it's way into the Warren report and you are right about this being a snapshot into the events of that day BEFORE the report came out
Warren report, we're not too foolish to trust. This group set
by big criminal lbj who killed JFK and allen dullness fired by JFK, then covered up by lbj and nixon's underling, gerald ford as a cover-up
absolute brilliant summations !!!
What reason do you have for promoting your false narratives and all your conspiracy rhetoric? You are not helping anything by pushing conspiracy theories.
you only need to hear about this one fact to understand; immediately after
the deed,they started repairing and refurbishing the limousine.
AFAIK,this is a federal felony.
If it is a federal felony now, I'm not sure it was back then. The murder of a president itself was not a federal crime back then; it was designated as a state crime only.
@@Caeruleo
i meant the tampering w evidence material.
@@sebastianrutkowski7316 The tampering with evidence material, at that time, was not a federal crime, because the murder itself was not a federal crime, as I have already explained.
I agree only a bunch of clowns would touch evidence.
@@Caeruleo are you sure the John Birch Society didn’t have something to do with that? 🤔
The person Oswald was (allegedly) meeting inside the Texas Theatre, does anyone know if THAT person purchased his ticket, or did he also slip in without paying ?
A German Mauser 7.65 overnight turned into a Italian Manlicher Carcano 6.5 cal.
Exit wounds became entrance wounds.............
The 2 types of bullets found in mr Tippet couldn't be fired from Oswalds revolver.
3 Expert Marksman couldn''t get 3 shots of in the time the shots were fired, further more none of them was able to hit the head of a stationary target.
Note: Oswald's scope was also mis aligned.
Why the commision never saw the authopsie pictures? And why 15 doctors from Parkland all said that the president had an exit wound at the back of his head?
One glaring anomaly after another, yet the debunkers will argue till they're blue in the face.
A) No Mauser was found, cops freely owned up to misidentifying the rifle, big deal.
B) Parkland doctors were speculating wildly about the wounds.
C) Oswald was using two types of ammo in the revolver and nearly a dozen witnesses ID'd him as the man who shot Tippit and fled
D) Shooting was successfully recreated by investigators using Oswald' rifle and 3 shots over 8-9 seconds at a slow-moving target a maximum of 88 yards off is hardly a superhuman feat, inf act it's child's play for a trained Marine
E) Parkland doctors looked at the autopsy photos and had no particular problem with them.
@@aaronz7056 looks like you're still at it. JTRIG troll/ mockingbird media mouthpiece, How's that working for ya?
Makin any progress with your trolling tactics? I didn't think so. You should get a life...troll bot.
This guy cannot even spell Tippit’s name?.. But wants us to believe his nonsense?..
Someone who did not know what kind of rifle it was said it was a Mauser, but this was inaccurately reported. Right away it was known as an Italian rifle made in 1940. No brand name was on the rifle. Soon the order letter for this rifle signed by Oswald was uncovered.
Hundreds, not three, experts and shooters have shown over and over that there was plenty of time for 3 shots from the carcano rifle, and it was over 8 seconds between shot one and shot three, not 6. Apparently this was shown in Stone's JFK movie too, although it was denied there.
The bullet's from Oswald's pistol could not be matched for certain with the pistol, but probably were. They were smaller than the barrel. The bullet shells WERE matched to Oswald's pistols to the exclusion of all other guns in the world.
Oswald's scope was not mis-aligned at least as far as could be seen visibly. All experts said it was an easy shot for anyone with any training, which Oswald had.
Warren hid the autopsy photos from the commission at the request of the Kennedy family. The doctors at Parkland did not do an autopsy and did not know whether wounds were exit or entrance wounds. The autopsy photos were examined by the Clark panel in 1968 and by other doctors, and they clearly showed that JFK was hit from behind.
Stop spreading misinformation and learn the facts. This is a good video.
Well I think that clears that up about whether he spoke & learnt Russian. Thanks Mom!
Also that the MARINE CORP taught him to speak and write Russian. They KNEW he was going to Russia and it seems likely they were involved in that. It doesn't mean they knew the CIA was going to use him as THE PATSY.
@@glockumollie1230 na man he taught himself....
glockumole and Rick fountain:
Does anyone know if it's annotated in his military records that he attended military language school to learn Russian? I know from friends that learned Russian in the military that the course takes about a year.
Also, all branches use the same military training facility, DLI, in California for language training.
He would had to have good grades to pass that school. It's a question I've always had and military record of his learning Russian in the military would be answered by those records. Please comment. Thanks.
@@gjle he was learing A LOT of stuff while in the USMC, except how to drive a car...He traveled the world, was in the USMC, yet didnt even have the ability to drive a car....Someone taught him Russian, and it wasnt himself.
@@dustyflair That really amazes me. How did he get to and from Walker's house? On a bus, back and forth with his rifle?? And He couldn't even drive himself? He had big time help, being given rides by Forbes inheritance 1960, his mother Ruth Forbes, Michael Paine who refused to pledge allegiance even when in the military. The Paines' saw to his most every need! Took care of his family needs, feed them, clothed them, gave advice, rides, help him get his job. That is what I call help.
Too bad "Mr. Ed" was interrupted. The show about a talking horse was more believable than the Warren Report.
Good stuff starting at 1:34:42 and ending at 1:35:24! Connolly does not agree that the bullet struck JFK in the back was the same bullet that hit him. In short, he disagrees with the magic bullet theory!
It is really odd that nothing I post about searching for the index to the WR on any site lasts in a post in these comments for more than a few seconds, and then gets taken down. Are people really THAT afraid of anyone reading the WR?
Doesn't change the fact that the attendant part of the back of JFK's head did not collapse until after he was taken into Parklands, nor that it was a frangible bullet exploding along the right side of JFK's head, as to be observed in the Zapruder Film.
What world do you live in there was a baseball size hole in the back of his head when he got to the hospital his brains were falling out the police officer riding to the left rear of the vehicle was covered in blood brain and bone what the fuck are you people listening to Dan rather really this is why it’s people like you that we’re still in the state were in do you actually work for the government because it sounds like you do you’re gonna stand behind that all the bullshit no matter what did you see the bullet they said broke Conley’s rib is still in perfect condition I’ve never seen a bullet do that ever and neither has anyone else you know why????
@@donaldleavy4379 …..the motorcycle cops were covered in blood/brain because the blood shot upward & they were going slowly forward right into it. Also, those same doctors say exactly what we see in the Zapruder film too. It just depends on whether you seen em in a conspiracy theory doc or lone shooter doc. I bet you think the Zapruder film…all 3 copies of it…were fakes, huh? And we can plainly see the back of his head intact there 😂 plus there’s the fact that Kennedy’s skull was shattered. So it could have fallen apart with all the jostling, etc while carrying him in. The hole was on the right front, but the only thing holding everything together was his scalp. Everything can be explained. We lone shooter believers don’t care either way & go by evidence. You conspiracy theorists want a conspiracy because you have something against the government. Which is why when debating, conspiracy theorists always have an attitude. And absolutely no evidence. Just theories. Anything can be made into a conspiracy if you really want it to be.
@@donaldleavy4379 ….also, I’ve seen an experiment on Nova where they shot the same exact bullet through 3 two by fours and it was undamaged!! They also had a 99 year old man re-enact the shots with the same gun and he did easily.
"nor that it was a frangible bullet exploding along the right side of JFK's head, as to be observed in the Zapruder Film.": You observed the bullet and decided it was a "frangible"?? Non-frangible bullets fragment, you know.
I like how they started it with the Moorman Polaroid, featuring the Grassy Knoll and Badge Man.
Tippet was Badge Man
@@timashcraft6262 Tippet saw the two shooters leave the Texas School Book Depository in the back while he was sitting in his patrol car. They later killed him.
@@timashcraft6262 Rubbish, he was out on patrol elsewhere, nobody ever saw a man in a cop uniform escaping the area, and if Badge Man was a shooter, that photo shows he was standing about 20 feet back from the fence and was about ten feet tall.
@@henochparks Where in the world do people read this fiction?
@@aaronz7056 it would be interesting to get ALL the dental reports on Ruby’s mother’s teeth. They were not all included in the Warren Commission report.
Why did Oswald flee the TSBD after the assassination, the only employee in the building to do so ? And why didn't he take his curtain rods with him ?
At 1:26 the clips that hold the shoulder strap is on the bottom of the rifle and the picture they have of Oswell posing at his house with a rifle the clips that hold the shoulder strap are on the side of the rifle so that means it's a different rifle.
Strap was adjustable.
I want to know the truth not some fairy tale
In 1993 a medical student who was working at Parkland Hospital on the day of the assassination was interviewed, and she stated that she saw the presidential limo immediately after it arrived, and there was a bullet hole in windshield from the FRONT to the BACK.
Only damage to the windshield is a crack from a bullet fragment which also damaged the chrome plating... from the *inside.* Both are still in the National Archives.
There were several medical students and several Dallas Policeman who also saw the hole, "big enough to stick a pencil through" as one motorcycle trooper named Ellis reported. Medical student named Evalea Glanges saw it, and she later went on to become the CEO of another major hospital in Dallas. She never changed or altered her testimony. The Secret Service then quickly drove the limo away, despite it being the "scene of the crime" and should have remained untouched, untampered with, and unmoved as vital evidence. But the windshield was changed and the interior was completely redone within two days according to technicians at the Ford plant in Ohio who actually performed the work.
@@ghostdance56 What did I literally just say? And the idea somebody was standing somewhere in front of the limo, firing through glass (!) and past the ears of a carful of passengers while shooting Kennedy in the face, all the while assuming this would be framed on a lone shooter from behind, is laughable.
@@aaronz7056 - You're consistently laughable son. Don't know what you said, I never think about what you say, what would be the point of that, you're clueless. The windshield had the hole, it came from a shot from the overpass that struck Kennedy in the neck. Now run along son, lets the adults have their conversations.
@@ghostdance56why do you resort to childish insults when someone presents an alternative view from yours? An adult would discuss it, not resort to childish behavior.
WHY,...have I never heard anyone question the motorcade route - last minute change?? The only person who had the authority to change the route was the Mayor Earle Cabell who was the brother of Charles Cabell (deputy director of the CIA) He was fired by JFK after the bay of pigs fiasco. The motorcade was originally supposed to go straight down under the triple overpass train bridge to the trade mart. It was changed to a route that was ILLEGAL according to Fletcher Prouty (chief of special operations for the joint chiefs of staff) under JFK. The assassination just happened to take place in the area where the motorcade route was changed. No connection? Just a coincidence? This fact alone is proof of government collusion. WAKE UP AMERICA.
In an interview with LBJ filmed in September 1969, Walter Cronkite asked LBJ whether he was satisfied there was no international conspiracy in the JFK assassination. LBJ requested that his answer not be broadcast on the grounds of 'national security'. It was eventually broadcast after his death.
The following is what he said:
LBJ: "I can't honestly say that I've ever been completely relieved of the fact that there might have been international connections".
Cronkite: "You mean you still feel that there might might have been?"
LBJ shifts uncomfortably in his seat.
LBJ: "Uh, well I have not completely discounted it".
Cronkite: "Well that would seem to indicate that you, uh, don't have full confidence in the Warren Commission Report".
LBJ: "No. No, I think the Warren Commission study an....I think first of all is composed of the ablest and most judicious and bipartisan men in this country. Second, I think they had only one objective and that was the truth. Third, I think they were competent and did the best they could. But I don't think that they or me or anyone else is always absolutely sure of every thing that might have motivated Oswald or....or...others that, uh, could have been involved".
LBJ didn't 'orchestrate' the JFK murder
@@lebeautymarq8834 and they got Oswald to do it? Sounds a bit far fetched
@@peterfraser9070 Oswald was just the patsy.
@@lebeautymarq8834 He lied to the cops and cameras at the police station about a lot of things. He said on film he didn't know why he had been brought in to the station. But during his arrest at the theatre earlier, when he was first approached by a policeman, he said, "This is it!", punched the cop and tried to shoot him!
@@peterfraser9070 None of that proves he shot the president though ✌️
Shucks, I love Mr. Ed. Maybe next time.
It shows children were force educated on findings of the Warren Report. Let the brainwashing begin.
Too bad people didn't get to hear this thing from the horse's mouth! Alls they got was Jack Ruby's mother's teeth in that Warren Report....
FORMISANOISATOTALSHITBAG
@@shernitadee uth ugh
@@nancywhitson7609 ???
The Marines certainly facilitated his trip to Russia, whether they ordered him or not.
He wasn't supposed to go anywhere according to his discharge, because he left the Corps early on the grounds that his mom was ill and needed him at home to care for her.
He NEEDED the Marine Corps permission to travel outside of the US as he was required to enlist in the Reserves as a part of his discharge agreement. He was granted this permission after applying for it almost immediately after leaving. Citing he was to go to Switzerland to study at The Albert Schweitzer School, (which has long been regarded as a CIA front...).
So they discharged him to go home and look after his mom, and immediately granted him permission to leave his sick mom, violating the terms of his discharge.
And considering his defection and announcement that he would tell the Russians everything he knew, and considering that the "Untouchable" U2 spy plane flown by FG Powers (the sort Oswald was trained to track...) was shot down during his stay in Russia, it's really very odd that he was never even questioned by the authorities on his return. Or not in any "official" capacity at any rate.
As Costner as Garrison points out in Stone's "JFK" he should have been arrested and charged as a traitor. But he was granted a new passport and loaned the money to travel home.
Presumably they were more keen to make sure he fulfilled his promise to go home and take care of his poor old mom, than get to the bottom of his time in Russia, and Lee clearly needed his new Russian bride, (whose granting of a visa was as close to a miracle as the US State Department has ever performed) to help?
THIS, THIS, THIS!! Oswald lied time and time again, even committing a felony of printing false identifications for not only himself but others. It seems he could do no wrong and his family was well taken care. Even with the birth if his new baby, they set them up and our tax dollars paid for the hospital of the new baby girl.
His mission to the Soviet union was to breakup the Paris peace SUMMIT set for middle MAY 1960 but the MAY 1 1960 U 2 shootdown broke off the Paris peace SUMMIT and continued the rightwing warhawk COLD WAR
His first mission was in Japan at the queen bee night club in downtown Tokyo ( go inside the queen bee and provide false information to KGB AGENTS at the queen bee about the U2 spy planes at atsugi air base )
Queen bee in downtown Tokyo was loaded with female KGB spys wanting to know about the U2 overflight operation over Soviet airspace
Oswald was successful in his first mission with the O.N.I and was later recruited by the CIA to go to Russia
Plain and simple.......AND Chilling.
It's kinda funny how Mrs Paine befriended the Oswalds then, of all places, conveniently helped Lee Harvey get the job at the school book depository !
Yeah, that loser’s luck didn’t run out until he scurried past a crime fighting shoe salesman
Mrs Paine is a Lying Government. Scumbag.. so is or was her scumbag husband… there are hundreds on the coverup payroll. & the assassination as well
@@donaldleavy4379 There must be a hefty UA-cam payroll too 😂😂
She didn’t help,Marina asked her did she know of anybody hiring for work for Oswald,he went for the interview and got it ! Hardly like Ruth Paine was insisting on it,you’re making a moot point !
@@shanet5604 forget about it, no one’s insisting Ruth Paine masterminded it. It’s just one more point of interest-Oswald working at a building owned by the founder of the civil air patrol.
Have never seen these interviews put together like this is before..very nice job! about the speaking Russian thing, marina once said during an interview that when she first met Oswald at the factory they worked at she thought he had to be a local as his Russian was very good and he had the same accent and used the same colloquialism's as the locals and spoke with them effortlessly..she had been brought in from another city to work in the factory like a lot of the workers there..yet once back in the USA multiple people said his Russian was not very good at all, he spoke it in a childish way often having to resort to English words as his vocabulary was poor, and had an awkward Texan element to his accent that made his Russian sound strange..some people think this is evidence the Oswald that went and the Oswald that came back were two different guys..this was supposedly a thing both sides did..when there was a national that wanted to defect we would train a "match" for them to operate as an agent..allowing us to get our defector and us to get an agent in to the county and leave the national as a "Ghost" that could operate anywhere..has always seemed a little convulted for me tho.
That's silly. It was the same man who went and the same man who returned as his brother and mother, for starters, could have told you.
Yea that's why I said this theory has always seemed too convoluted to me..just like to see how even far out ideas realte in new ways..I have kept it in mind over the years since I think I first heard the idea in probably the movie JFK and seeing how Oliver stone touted this a different Oswald that went came back...if something like this theory ever did actually play out like this I imagine something that huge would only be risked or attempted for someone extremly important and I don't know who Oswald would be replacing or vice versa that could be that important..there is one thing regarding this I have found interesting tho..look at Oswalds enlistment photo from the military and then the photo of him and marina arriving back in the US on the ship..they say the relationship of your features to each other don't really change much..if you look at the 2 picks the relationship of where his ears line up to his eyeline and upper lip, there sure appears like there is a very different relationship between them and how they line up when comparing the two photos..as a matter of fact the return home pic which is the first one of his repatriation, doesn't really seem to match up well with any other Oswald photos...not saying it's not him it's just an interesting anecdotal point
@@jamesharen8607 Still a ridiculous one, and as for Oliver Stone, that guy just made up so much stuff in that worthless pack of fiction movie of his it would take all day to list it all, but at least he made himself a bundle of money peddling that garbage.
@@aaronz7056 Did you greet Oswald at the airport or something? Or was that part of Magic Con 1964?
@@aaronz7056 You should watch the new documentary Oliver Stone has just released, ‘JFK Revisited: Through the Looking Glass’. He lays out some of the physical evidence for conspiracy in it. It might be more to your taste!
Allen Dulles. He was looking for himself. Ex head of the CIA had a lot of clout to get his “retired” self appointed as one of the “8 prominent Americans”
Dulles and his brother were corrupt fascists. Just ask the people of Guatemala and Iran, who saw their democracies die so the Dulles brothers and their cronies could make more money of their corporate holdings. The book Bitter Fruit documents all this.
Dulles and Bush41 were both CIA Directors forced to resign by JFK and Al Gore with Bill Clinton. Both Directors were connected to the Kennedy assassination and the 2000 voting controversy thru two sets of brothers, the Cabell and the Bush brothers. Earl Cabell was the Mayor of Dallas and Jeb Bush was the Governor of Florida. Mayor Cabell's brother was the ex-CIA Deputy Director Charles Cabell, forced to retire along with his CIA boss, Allen Dulles, by JFK. Governor Jeb Bush's brother, George W Bush, father was forced to retire as President by the presidential team of Al Gore and Bill Clinton. Texas was the home state of the next President, Vice President Lyndon Johnson. Florida was the political home state of the brother of the next President, the son of a Vice President, George W Bush. Not a coincidence, to much to be just a coincidence. It was a similar repeat of the Kennedy assassination in Florida. Why?
@@wtmerit6129 President Kennedy was assassinated in Dallas, Texas, not in Florida.
@@gymnastix
Florida, that’s funny. These “fact-checkers” can’t even keep their facts straight.
@@gymnastix no Florida was referring to the the 2000 vote count , not that keneddy was shot in Florida . I think 👍
The people interviewed are interesting, but CBS should be ashamed of themselves for backing the Warren Report
Was there a conspiracy?
I can't laugh that hard
Me neither, after all these years there is still no credible evidence of one.
Dan Rathers- a lifetime of lies
He started well tho.... ;-}
Landlady said you didnt get a good grunt out of him.Real big cia agent Lol.
This is about as factual as you could possibly get.
Connally said he didnt hear a word from Kennedy.
Connally says the car never were stopped so throw that bullshit out the window.
I was eating a grilled cheese sandwich and watching an episode of Matlock from my DVD box set earlier today when I realized that I was under 4 years old when JFK was assassinated and that all this time I have not been doing my part in getting to the bottom of this investigation.
My feelings went from "I'm going to quit my job to devote my entire life to this" to "I have no frame of reference.... I'm like a child who wanders into the middle of a movie and wants to know..." But at the same time I'm thinking that the answers are most likely found in Hunter Biden's laptop, but what do I know.... oh well, fuck it, I'm going bowling.
I was eating a bag of sour cream and onion chips and watching my DVD collection of McMillan and Wife when I realized that I was 5 years old when that show began, and all that I cared about at the time was watching Romper Room. Remember Romper Room? That was an American show, right? I wonder if it's still on the air. I wanted to be on that show...
Sounds like you have a good life. But try and upgrade from "pasteurized processed cheese product" to real cheese. It costs more. But cost shouldn't matter to a a Democrat.
@@bluesandmore786 Ahhh...in other words, don't just let the CT Machine spoon-feed you conspiracy theories and gobble it up. Look at real-life evidence and accept the truth, even if it's boring and Oswald did do it, mostly likely all by his lonesome.
@@peterfraser9070 -go read your copy of Why British Genetics Are Substandard.
@@bluesandmore786 Speaking of Blues and More....your ID brings back memories...... back in the late 80s, the owners of B.L.U.E.S. on Halsted street in Chicago decided to open a music club that ventured into other styles - Zydeco, for example - and called it Blues Etcetera. They didn't have grilled cheese sandwiches, but it was a great little place.
He was shot from the front right.
Allen Dulles and Gerald Ford were signatories of the thing.