Undeniable Archaeological Evidence of The Book of Mormon in North America

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 29 сер 2024
  • Undeniable Archaeological Evidence of The Book of Mormon in North America.

КОМЕНТАРІ • 40

  • @stevenkellner
    @stevenkellner 4 роки тому +67

    Where are the artifacts from that hill?

  • @paulharrison5977
    @paulharrison5977 8 років тому +107

    'no iron because its damp', well iron survives from ship wrecks and its pretty damp below the sea, the iron artefact would eventually survive as a hollow lump with the corrosion around it, the corrosion is not going to disappear, ive seen this a few times , I have worked on proper archaeological sites a few times

  • @shitluck78d19
    @shitluck78d19 Рік тому +11

    Where's the pottery from the people you speak of?

  • @robinbeecher590
    @robinbeecher590 Рік тому +2

    My grandfather was shown so many things through Jesus Christ and other who were medicine men and chiefs of old. All they did was ask and was shown areas to prove of proof. This is how we was able to say yes for facts not just through our stories of old.

  • @daleproctor3723
    @daleproctor3723 8 років тому +39

    Which of these dozens of the museums have pre-contact breast plates?

    • @daleproctor3723
      @daleproctor3723 8 років тому +2

      ?????

    • @deanrogerbender
      @deanrogerbender 8 років тому +23

      How about the Peabody Museum in Boston where seven thin gold plates with pictorgraic and hieroglyphic writings upon them. These were found in Chichen Itza's sacred cenote in 1904 by archaeologist Edward Herbert Thompson. That should be even more impressive than breast plates.

    • @theYguy300
      @theYguy300 8 років тому +5

      +Dean Bender got any links for that?

    • @deanrogerbender
      @deanrogerbender 8 років тому +21

      A reference:
      Thin Gold Plate with Hieroglyphic Writing extracted from the
      well at Chichén Itzá by Harvard Archaeologist, Herbert Thompson, in 1904.
      Courtesy of Peabody Museum, Harvard, University. Image design by Geoff Shupe © 2007. From the book by: Lund, John. Mesoamerica and the Book of Mormon: Is this the Place (Kindle Locations 5586-5587). The Communications Company. Kindle Edition.This is the footnote reference to a drawing at the beginning of chapter 6 of the book. I searched the internet for a Peabody Museum showing artifacts and found nothing. One would have to email them or visit the museum, I guess.

  • @akicitaa.8233
    @akicitaa.8233 6 років тому +32

    Since Cumorah was a day's march from the narrow neck of land with ocean on each side, how does the New York Cumorah "match every description" of its location?

  • @saldomino1639
    @saldomino1639 3 місяці тому

    Great Reporting thank you !

  • @ensignj3242
    @ensignj3242 7 років тому +102

    Nothing testifies to the truthfulness of the Book of Mormon better than the Holy Ghost which testifies of all truth.

    • @terrencemyers1033
      @terrencemyers1033 4 роки тому +7

      The Book of Mormons is about the history of the House of Israel a.k.a. ISRAELITES, not Mormons.

  • @zubenelgenubi
    @zubenelgenubi Рік тому +3

    We *may* call it "undeniable", but people can deny and ignore what appears to be reasonable evidence very easily, unless they choose to allow God and the Holy Spirit to witness the truths taught by the Book of Mormon!!

  • @ethanseely1898
    @ethanseely1898 4 роки тому +19

    Awesome explanation!!! Blew my mind! I always thought that the nephites and lamanites resided in central America, but I'm glad that you cleared that up for me!

  • @toyolla86
    @toyolla86 8 років тому +19

    he meant southeastern portion of the united states.

  • @landons1846
    @landons1846 8 років тому +50

    This guy is THE MAN! I can't stop watching his videos. I want to know more!

  • @stevenkellner
    @stevenkellner 4 роки тому +13

    Most native Americans I've listened to say that they giants built the mounds and forts and that the natives killed them all off

  • @rabbit4111
    @rabbit4111 4 роки тому +5

    Brilliant summary of facts we read about, but have nothing tangible ( until NOW ) Thank you.

  • @robinbeecher590
    @robinbeecher590 Рік тому +1

    Us native call hills mountains. And many tablets were known in different areas not all in New York and was said in the Book of Mormon. The closer we get to the end it was more of the Lamanites stories and no none Nephites just many were not spoken of and thought as dead just they were not all dead but under protection from the Lamanites.

  • @dustd9806
    @dustd9806 Рік тому +3

    Who is speaking?

  • @JustViolet626
    @JustViolet626 4 роки тому +7

    Wow, that's cool. I really don't know how to feel about this for some reason, I should be happy, right?

  • @scottsimonsen1738
    @scottsimonsen1738 8 років тому +13

    Awesome stuff. Can't wait to hear more.

  • @terrencemyers1033
    @terrencemyers1033 4 роки тому +21

    When are people going to understand that the Bible and the Book of Mormon is about the history of the ISRAELITES?

  • @Alaine5811
    @Alaine5811 8 років тому +16

    8 different men? why wouldn't it have been hundreds?

  • @NinjaMaster1
    @NinjaMaster1 8 років тому +13

    I would not be so quick to dismiss the possibility that Central Americans had metal working over 2000 years ago. Up until a few years ago it was believed that copper tools dated back to around 3000 years ago. This is until Utsi the 5000 year old ice Man was discovered with a copper axe. The Mayans had metal breast plates and head plates. The only question is, how long ago did they start using them. The science is still out on that.
    I too would like to know details about these North American museums that house ancient metal armor. I have seen the Mayan armor but I'm not familiar with these North American artifacts you speak of.

    • @theYguy300
      @theYguy300 8 років тому +2

      you mean Otzi, and he was Italian.

    • @NinjaMaster1
      @NinjaMaster1 8 років тому

      +AJ Harper Spelling is not universal across international boarders, even among countries that speak the same language. Other than that, what is your point? 허브

    • @theYguy300
      @theYguy300 8 років тому +4

      Shane Myler the point is, your post gives out vibes that this is an ancient Native American when in reality, a European.

  • @victoriagledhill5872
    @victoriagledhill5872 4 роки тому +2

    Who's the man talking! Watched 3 videos of him already and no name... super frustrating. (Love the videos.... But frustrating)

    • @danjohnson1015
      @danjohnson1015 4 роки тому +6

      I believe his name is Rod Meldrum. He has a lot of videos about this subject on UA-cam.

  • @swamibubba
    @swamibubba 8 років тому +9

    thanks love and blessings

  • @MrArtist7777
    @MrArtist7777 8 років тому +17

    Great interview, thank you! Very true what Meldrum says here; that the Mayan civilization pre-dates Lehi's arrival to the Americas, by hundreds of years, has no proof of two divisions of people fighting each other and has a clear history of coming over on boats from E. Asia, as their DNA clearly shows. Also, the Mayans had no knowledge of metallurgy; no swords, knives or arrowheads, which the Nephites clearly had good knowledge of, as Nephi was well-versed in the ancient Jewish practice of metallurgy: steel bow, sword, metal plates. Lehi and his family, along with the Mulekites, clearly landed in America with a flourishing civilization in the Ohio Valley region.

  • @tremiller5807
    @tremiller5807 8 років тому +65

    The church is true. No doubt

  • @JohnHurtNoblesquire
    @JohnHurtNoblesquire 8 років тому +9

    Very well described. Subscribed.

  • @theephraimite
    @theephraimite 3 роки тому

    Sunday - October 18, 2020.

  • @R.E.A.P
    @R.E.A.P 6 років тому +41

    proof......proof....... proof...?
    read the book of Mormon...... there's your proof!

  • @Cristina-lo4ip
    @Cristina-lo4ip 7 років тому +24

    😂😂😂😂😂

  • @slamdunk406
    @slamdunk406 Рік тому

    The best Book of Mormon geography theory by far is the Malaysian theory. The more you look into it, the more it yields.