I sold the Tammy 28-75 for the 28-200, which I absolutely love. It was hard to part with the 28-75 because the Sigma has looked more appealing for its form factor alone, for whenever I need something for professional use down the line. Glad your take reaffirms my thoughts.
I got this lens from my gf a couple of months back and I absolutely love it. I know build quality is technically worse than the 24-70 but I think it feels good and prefer that it's light so that's not a problem for me.
I was considering the sigma 24-70, but after hearing about the dust (even from a friend of mine), I decided against it. If this is better than the Tamron though, it could be a good option.
Sigma 24-70 definitely too heavy for photography, run and gun video, and gimbal use. Maybe I’m just weak 😂 but I’m selling mine and wanting to get this 28-70 over the tamron 28-75. Great video thanks for the info
A lot of people talk about how the 24-70 is right on the edge of being usable on gimbles. Have you had any specific situations where the gimble just flat out couldn't take the weight, or is it more of a muscle fatigue issue?
The rs2 even takes the 70-200 f2.8. Hope this helped. I also have the 12-24 and 24-70 gmasters mounted with the raveneye and follow focus motors withput any issue.
depending on the gimbal you have there will be no issues, but once in a cage and up slightly higher it becomes more 'on the edge. That being said, with the Ronin S if you cant balance it properly and then turn it on the gimbal will still function, it's just not optimal and battery life will suffer too.
3:19 You say the 24-70 is slightly sharper at the curve lines. I don't see it. What I DO see is the M in Mute and the H in HND is actually softer on the 24-70. Same with the days of the week. The T, F, and S are all sharper on the 28-70 image. Is it possible that you mixed up the titles in these images?
Hi thanks for your excellent video. 400 grams of difference is important. to work at discos and in clubs which would you prefer between 24-70 and 28-70? Also to be mounted on the gimbal in some cases.
I agree with you, sharpness isn’t much of an issue as it would be in a photo but the again there is Topaz Labs AI Sharpen which does an awesome job if your going to enlarge a photo for a big print. Sounds like a great lens! But looking at the 35-150 myself. Difficult decision! Lol
thanks for this review, I shoot weddings with 35mm 85mm and 50mm and have been thinking of replacing them with this for simplicity and being quicker on the day. I am used to shooting f1.8 and like that look but am curious as to whether if having switched to f2.8 I will notice a huge difference? For example that look we all desire it not just as a result of the aperture but of the compression the lens will give you, with the sigma 28-70 f2.8 you can get closer than with all my 3 primes thus throwing the background completely out. I notice chris you shoot weddings, did you feel and see a big difference? Do you still shoot weddings with it or have you reverted back to primes? Many thanks
The flexibility of having a 24-70 trumps the little difference you will notice, such a great lens for weddings. Not having to keep changing out lenses for all the different things that happen throughout a wedding day is huge.
I have the Tamron 28-75mm which is the direct rival to this. The image is incredibly sharp and I've never had ANY problems with the autofocus. So either I got lucky or maybe Chris got unlucky with his copy of the lens. But I can only recommend the Tamron for anyone who wants a budget f2.8 zoom lens that still has awesome quality!
I think I have a rough copy of the 28-75 as well. Everyone says it’s extremely sharp, but I find it soft compared to… all my other lenses. It’s also slow to focus, and super plasticy. Plus the barrel of the lens has started to creep out when I’m walking too. Safe to say it’s not agin well and I baby my gear. I’m thinking about switching to the sigma just due to the slightly smaller size, higher quality build, and better quality control. As time goes on, we’re starting to see more and more complaints about the Tamron.
Thanks for the good video bro. I'm using a7c and I decided to go with Sigma after watching your video. But I'm worried about waterproof. I heard that Sigma's waterproof is weaker than Tamron's. I'm thinking of taking photos and documentary videos in techno clubs and mountains. Is Sigma's waterproof okay?
Hello :) how is the lens if you use if without a gimbal regarding stabilization? I travel a lot and would need something small and light and good to use without anything else :) (for video, not photo)
I have the 28-70 sigma with the Sony a7iv is tht a great combination… wat the difference in quality And auto focus to the 24-70 … I kno about the eight differences… but I’m a dancer and I shoot mostly moving shots so it the 28-70 a perfect buy ?
Intresting, they seem so similar. I am currently looking at a 24/28-70 thanks for timing this to perfection! Also may I ask what font your CB watermark is?
Did you ever figure out what the difference was in the Sigma boxes you got on those two orders? Great video as always by the way. I still love my Tamron 28-75.....I love the images out of the Sigma 24-70, but that thing is sooooo heavy! I am used to primes and the Tamron 28-75 though lol
If you don't have a wider zoom or wide primes then don't get this lens. Get this only if you want mid range photography else get the 24-70 or 24-105. Believe me you will miss the 24 mm angle.
@@chrisbrockhurst Agreed. I always preferred their look over the sony lenses but the sizes were ridiculous. But now that sigmas are getting smaller/designed for mirrorless they're a no brainer. At least for me. Ps love your vids. keep up the good work!
I’m really considering buying this lens now! I have 2 questions: 1. Is it hard to balance on a gimbal with the barrel extending causing it to be front heavy and throws the balance off? 2. Also can i use this lens on my sony a6500? Thanks for the video man!
I'm still confused on how you had so much trouble with the Tamron. I loved it, it out performed the Sony gmaster in all categories except build quality. It was better at capturing focus at low light and just in general, light weight and was my go to lens until I got rid of all my Sony gear.
@@chrisbrockhurst yeah I guess that's what happens when companies make products on an assembly line. I suffered the same thing with the a73. I got rid of my fuji xh1 and xt3 for it and a a7r3. Hated everything about a73 except the ergonomics and battery life, changed it out immediately for an a9. But I see a lot of people on UA-cam who love it. Glad you where able to find what you were looking for in sigma. I'm loving these high quality third party options. No way I'm paying gmaster prices when there is something just as good for half the price.
@@chrisbrockhurst I bought both the Sigma and Tamron at the same time with the intention of testing both and sending one back. Ended up sending the Sigma back because it wasn't as sharp for me as the Tamron - I guess QA played a part there too
I plan on buying this lens for use with a sony a6300 which does not have image stabilization. Considering that this lens also does not have built in stabilization, do you recommend i go with the bulkier and more expensive sigma 24-70mm art?
03:48 - do you think this would "focus fast enough" for having action shots? EXAMPLE: skateboarder (or animal) jumping right in front of the camera for a wide angle freeze frame shot. I've heard a different reviewer say it's a magnificent lens, but quiet slow at auto focus..... Looking at your outdoor testing, it seems to take awhile to focus, especially for faster tracking for animals and action scenes. Please let me know, I'm considering buying this week. Cheers 👍
I'm on the market for a 2.8 all round. Need to decide between this and tamron. This is sharper. How about the autofocus? Fast and accurate? Main work is video.
This lens is definitely better than the Sony 24-70mm f2.8 in terms of performance. The minimum focus distance is half distance on the Sigma and it has more aperture blades, giving it a smoother bokeh.
Did you manually focus in those wedding video samples (and other video projects?) I usually manually focus my cinema lens but looking for a second auto lens as needed (to give to my second shooter opposite my 24-70).
![АЛАУДИНОВ у Скабеевой: эти их ВСУ нас НЕ ДОГОНЯТ 😁 [Пародия]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/an0anqU4WGQ/mqdefault.jpg)
Disclaimer: you will receive compliments while wearing the shirts ✖️
Boom!
Since you're sponsoring everyone, I guess I'll have to check you folks out now.
I would happily buy a big Cuts order, but it’s very difficult in England.
Zooms have to be special to attract my attention, and weight-aperture ratio is unique so I think I'll get one. Small enough for APS-C, too.
I sold the Tammy 28-75 for the 28-200, which I absolutely love. It was hard to part with the 28-75 because the Sigma has looked more appealing for its form factor alone, for whenever I need something for professional use down the line. Glad your take reaffirms my thoughts.
Love my 28-200
I got this lens from my gf a couple of months back and I absolutely love it. I know build quality is technically worse than the 24-70 but I think it feels good and prefer that it's light so that's not a problem for me.
I was considering the sigma 24-70, but after hearing about the dust (even from a friend of mine), I decided against it. If this is better than the Tamron though, it could be a good option.
this is better than the Tammy for sure
@@chrisbrockhurst Better than Tamron G1 or G2 too? Can you compare AF speed and bokeh rendering for this Sigma and Tamron G2?
The dust issue is fixed on the newer versions of the sigma 24-70 btw.
i have the 24-70 art and i love it tbh
samsies.
Yes, this or the Sony FE 24-105mm lens is the go-to run n' gun lens I'd like to have as a setup!
24-105 is great too!
@@chrisbrockhurst It's the lens I want most for a zoom lens haha!
@@Micah-Woods username checks out
Sigma 24-70 definitely too heavy for photography, run and gun video, and gimbal use. Maybe I’m just weak 😂 but I’m selling mine and wanting to get this 28-70 over the tamron 28-75. Great video thanks for the info
Chris, what about the barrel distortion at 28mm in video mode? Is there any and if yes how you work with it in post? Thanks!
A lot of people talk about how the 24-70 is right on the edge of being usable on gimbles. Have you had any specific situations where the gimble just flat out couldn't take the weight, or is it more of a muscle fatigue issue?
The rs2 even takes the 70-200 f2.8. Hope this helped. I also have the 12-24 and 24-70 gmasters mounted with the raveneye and follow focus motors withput any issue.
depending on the gimbal you have there will be no issues, but once in a cage and up slightly higher it becomes more 'on the edge. That being said, with the Ronin S if you cant balance it properly and then turn it on the gimbal will still function, it's just not optimal and battery life will suffer too.
@@chrisbrockhurst Right, I figured it was the universal "it depends."
Thanks for taking the time!
3:19 You say the 24-70 is slightly sharper at the curve lines. I don't see it. What I DO see is the M in Mute and the H in HND is actually softer on the 24-70. Same with the days of the week. The T, F, and S are all sharper on the 28-70 image. Is it possible that you mixed up the titles in these images?
Hi thanks for your excellent video. 400 grams of difference is important. to work at discos and in clubs which would you prefer between 24-70 and 28-70? Also to be mounted on the gimbal in some cases.
So much value, thank you! How did August go with the lens, does the job? Considering buying one.
I agree with you, sharpness isn’t much of an issue as it would be in a photo but the again there is Topaz Labs AI Sharpen which does an awesome job if your going to enlarge a photo for a big print. Sounds like a great lens! But looking at the 35-150 myself. Difficult decision! Lol
How does this compare to the Tamron 28-75mm G2 lens? Which would you choose if you could only pick one of the two?!
thanks for this review, I shoot weddings with 35mm 85mm and 50mm and have been thinking of replacing them with this for simplicity and being quicker on the day. I am used to shooting f1.8 and like that look but am curious as to whether if having switched to f2.8 I will notice a huge difference? For example that look we all desire it not just as a result of the aperture but of the compression the lens will give you, with the sigma 28-70 f2.8 you can get closer than with all my 3 primes thus throwing the background completely out. I notice chris you shoot weddings, did you feel and see a big difference? Do you still shoot weddings with it or have you reverted back to primes? Many thanks
The flexibility of having a 24-70 trumps the little difference you will notice, such a great lens for weddings. Not having to keep changing out lenses for all the different things that happen throughout a wedding day is huge.
Klasse gemacht gefällt mir außerordentlich gut LG.Pidi
I have the Tamron 28-75mm which is the direct rival to this. The image is incredibly sharp and I've never had ANY problems with the autofocus. So either I got lucky or maybe Chris got unlucky with his copy of the lens. But I can only recommend the Tamron for anyone who wants a budget f2.8 zoom lens that still has awesome quality!
I hear alot of people say this, I got it when it first came out so who knows!
I think I have a rough copy of the 28-75 as well. Everyone says it’s extremely sharp, but I find it soft compared to… all my other lenses. It’s also slow to focus, and super plasticy. Plus the barrel of the lens has started to creep out when I’m walking too. Safe to say it’s not agin well and I baby my gear. I’m thinking about switching to the sigma just due to the slightly smaller size, higher quality build, and better quality control. As time goes on, we’re starting to see more and more complaints about the Tamron.
Thanks for the good video bro. I'm using a7c and I decided to go with Sigma after watching your video. But I'm worried about waterproof. I heard that Sigma's waterproof is weaker than Tamron's. I'm thinking of taking photos and documentary videos in techno clubs and mountains. Is Sigma's waterproof okay?
Hello :) how is the lens if you use if without a gimbal regarding stabilization? I travel a lot and would need something small and light and good to use without anything else :) (for video, not photo)
I have the 28-70 sigma with the Sony a7iv is tht a great combination… wat the difference in quality And auto focus to the 24-70 … I kno about the eight differences… but I’m a dancer and I shoot mostly moving shots so it the 28-70 a perfect buy ?
Gracias por tu explicación, excelente video!!! Saludos desde Guatemala!!!
The Tamron QC is a no go for me
I'm sold, amazing video mate!
Intresting, they seem so similar. I am currently looking at a 24/28-70 thanks for timing this to perfection! Also may I ask what font your CB watermark is?
great question, I genuinely have no idea, made it ages ago. Sorry
I own the Tamron and also bought the Sigma and i was shocked how bad it is. At the long end the Tamron is so much sharper than the Sigma.
Why would you buy the sigma if you had the same focal length already?
Did you ever figure out what the difference was in the Sigma boxes you got on those two orders? Great video as always by the way. I still love my Tamron 28-75.....I love the images out of the Sigma 24-70, but that thing is sooooo heavy! I am used to primes and the Tamron 28-75 though lol
nope! I think its to do with where it came from, still has a warranty so all good.
Thank you for the great review
What are your thoughts on Sony 24-70 GM lens?
people love it. I have never used it/seen the need
I know you said you did a couple of weddings, how was the low light performance out of it? Focus issues?
nothing! worked great
What happened to colour grade at the ending of video😅😅 7:50
If you don't have a wider zoom or wide primes then don't get this lens. Get this only if you want mid range photography else get the 24-70 or 24-105. Believe me you will miss the 24 mm angle.
That's exactly what I said in the video.
how come the dust not affecting the photos?!
Can you share your lighting setup. I am using Sony A7C with 17-28 (thanks to your video)
I use a 24mm for videos. Aputure 120D 45 degree angled down at me about 4 ft away.
also a mist filter.
This lens is a beast. Best all around lens I've ever used.
Sigma knows what they are doing
@@chrisbrockhurst Agreed. I always preferred their look over the sony lenses but the sizes were ridiculous. But now that sigmas are getting smaller/designed for mirrorless they're a no brainer. At least for me.
Ps love your vids. keep up the good work!
Dust in the lens does affect the image quality, it lowers the contrast and might even be visible!
I’m really considering buying this lens now! I have 2 questions:
1. Is it hard to balance on a gimbal with the barrel extending causing it to be front heavy and throws the balance off?
2. Also can i use this lens on my sony a6500?
Thanks for the video man!
it's such a light lens that even extended it will balance easily. Balance it with the barrel half extended for best results
@@chrisbrockhurst Thanks dude! Ordered it because of your video :) Keep it coming!
I'm still confused on how you had so much trouble with the Tamron. I loved it, it out performed the Sony gmaster in all categories except build quality. It was better at capturing focus at low light and just in general, light weight and was my go to lens until I got rid of all my Sony gear.
I hear so many people agreeing with me and then so many saying the opposite. I got it when it first came out so my only thought is QA?
@@chrisbrockhurst yeah I guess that's what happens when companies make products on an assembly line. I suffered the same thing with the a73. I got rid of my fuji xh1 and xt3 for it and a a7r3. Hated everything about a73 except the ergonomics and battery life, changed it out immediately for an a9. But I see a lot of people on UA-cam who love it. Glad you where able to find what you were looking for in sigma. I'm loving these high quality third party options. No way I'm paying gmaster prices when there is something just as good for half the price.
@@chrisbrockhurst I bought both the Sigma and Tamron at the same time with the intention of testing both and sending one back. Ended up sending the Sigma back because it wasn't as sharp for me as the Tamron - I guess QA played a part there too
I plan on buying this lens for use with a sony a6300 which does not have image stabilization. Considering that this lens also does not have built in stabilization, do you recommend i go with the bulkier and more expensive sigma 24-70mm art?
The new Sigma 18-50 looks amazing for your a6300
Was that Matthew Paquette?
Maybeeeeeeeeee
Who?
@@matthewpaquette no idea
@@matthewpaquette Aha, I knew it!
@@chrisbrockhurst You guys are awesome!!
Can I use this lens for Sony fx3?
Thanks waiting for this to arrive ! It looks better than this damn Canon 18 - 55mm !!! Geez ?!
03:48 - do you think this would "focus fast enough" for having action shots? EXAMPLE: skateboarder (or animal) jumping right in front of the camera for a wide angle freeze frame shot.
I've heard a different reviewer say it's a magnificent lens, but quiet slow at auto focus.....
Looking at your outdoor testing, it seems to take awhile to focus, especially for faster tracking for animals and action scenes.
Please let me know, I'm considering buying this week.
Cheers 👍
Yes, curious the same
I'm on the market for a 2.8 all round.
Need to decide between this and tamron. This is sharper. How about the autofocus? Fast and accurate? Main work is video.
Hi Jorge! Have you come to any conclusions? Having the same question here. Thank you!
@@ineditstudios i bought one last year, super happy with it, fast focus, lightweight and sharp
This lens is definitely better than the Sony 24-70mm f2.8 in terms of performance. The minimum focus distance is half distance on the Sigma and it has more aperture blades, giving it a smoother bokeh.
I've been thinking if getting this one instead of the SONY. Any updates as of now before I make a purchase? Suggestions accepted lol
did you shoot the slow motion at 4k? 1080?
Did you manually focus in those wedding video samples (and other video projects?) I usually manually focus my cinema lens but looking for a second auto lens as needed (to give to my second shooter opposite my 24-70).
Entirely auto
How do you like your Rode Wireless Go? Do you have an external audio recorder, or are you relying on the camera for that?
absolutely love it. normally record directly into the camera,
@@chrisbrockhurst Sweet! Thanks for the reply. Thanks to you, I'll be buying a Rode Wireless Go. Keep up the incredible work, sir!
Looks like the AF is not working that well, anyone with an A7s3 will tell me if it's reliable for professional work like interview ?
i have the fx3, and use this lens for wedding video. Autofocus is great. It could be the settings he's using
I think u chopped the adjustment layer 😂😅😅
Yup. 😅
"She wanted to touch" :o
Youre not alone ?! Loads of people beating the 28-70MM up for the 24-70MM ?! DONT KNOCK IT TILL YOU TRY IT !!!
Gotten some great portraits out of mine.
Does this have the same dust issue as their 24-70?
Negative
I got mine for $900 from Adorama.
Sup chris 🙇🏾♂️🤎
howdy.
The examples both say SIGMA
...because they are?
@@chrisbrockhurst He's referencing a meme.
@@chrisbrockhurst I aplogize for some reason I thought you said you were comparing it against the Tamron. Forgive the error.
This lens has a dust problem
not in my experience.
This or 24-70 ?