Ed, I had been struggling to make a decision between the Audient ID 14mkii , the scarlett 2i2 and the EVO 8 and I literally just purchased the Audient ID 14mkii based on your other comparison videos and the this Review. I can't wait to get started. Thank you Ed. Great videos by the way. I'm a fan!
I have the ID14 and just got the ASP800. Building a full system with the ID14 using the ADAT port was simple and expanded the number of mic inputs The quality of the preamps is the best
always great reviews thank you. I am looking at upgradiing my gen 3 scarlett in 2024 up to this price range, wondering if he id14 mk II is still the best option, with the new interfaces and upgrades over the last year or so. still looks like it to me, but will you be doing any updated interface reviews soon for small home studios, like this, I only find them from 2 - 3 years ago.
Super helpful vid. Thanks Ed. I'm so close to buying one of these. I like everything about them. But, I recently heard that some folks have the experience of them going kaput after a year or so of use. Do you have any insight about this possible issue?
The problem is it doesn’t have low cut like Apollo and it does make a big difference when recording clean noise floor with low cut I can see the db meter is much lower when low cut engaged vs audient no low cut
Thank you very much for the video, I will buy the Audient iD14. I will only work with mixing and mastering and recording vocals and guitar. I'm starting now and I think it will suit me very well according to your video. I really liked your image quality, which camera are you using?
I bought this and plan to record synth, guitar and vocals (maybe). I use lots of pedal effects. Will this start clipping the inputs quicker? Also I assume it can run the DT 990 pro from beyerdynamic? I was having problems with my volt 2 and it's headphone output sounding awful with the 990s but the rear outputs were fine.
Thanks. I've not had access to an SSL since my Top Ten Audio Interface video but I don't remember the SSL sounding as good as the iD14mki, and this is definitely an improvement on that. Plus, for me, ADAT input is important. iD14mkii Vs UA Apollo video coming soon.
@@EdThorne Thanks Ed, I have an extensive experience in these things having been senior engineer at Roland UK and working at Yamaha and Alesis UK (I also modify DAC circuitry nowadays). I feel that as a marketing ploy the M2 is made to enhance the low end at the expense of he high (this is very easily done by changing capacitor and resistor values after the DAC. I feel that the Audient may well be cleaner and more true to the original signal. I don't see the point in adding colouration to the input like the Volt and SSLs do (way better to do this with Software which can be undone later in the DAW).
@@delatronics3257 Ny experience is slightly different. I find the M2 quite neutral, almost weak in the low end. The Audient is definitely more coloured. To my ears at least, in my studio anyway.
@@EdThorne That's weird, I've watched hours of comparisons from different channels and I don't perceive that. Unfortunately I was locked out of the UK due to travel restrictions early in 2021 and now live in Brazil, we don't yet have a fully working Amazon where you can buy multiple interfaces and return free of charge; here, you only ever get 3 months guarantee even on new products, and once they are in your possession it is hard to return and get your money back. I trust your opinions over those in other channels, so I will be keenly awaiting your views on the M2 before pulling the trigger on the ID14 mkii.
I just switched to the ID14 from the Motu. Loved the M2 BUT I noticed…the higher I put up the headphone volume…the more distortion/degradation I got on my inputs. It’s very very subtle, but it’s happening nonetheless. At first I thought it could just be my unit but after sifting reddit/the internet I saw I wasn’t the only person with this problem. Like I said it is hardly noticeable…something you need to be listening hard and “testing” for but regardless, I don’t want it to be there.
Hi Ed. Thanks for the informative video. I am buying this today! One question, can I link my Focusrite Saffire Pro 40 via Adat or does it only work with the Audient ASP800? I've recently upgraded my Mac and it has made the Saffire Pro 40 redundant due to not having firewire ports
What do you Think which one is the best of those interfaces: This auident that you reviewed The new Clarett+ The Appolo solo. Thank like so much you channel
Tough one, they all have different strengths. I think Clarett is the best in terms of preamps and converters, plus it’s ADAT expandable. The iD14 is competitive because of the price and ID monitor app. The Solo has Console, which is by the far the best monitor processing app on the market. So it depends what you need.
Hey Ed, may I have your opinion? Between Yamaha AG06 and this Audient iD14 MK2, which one is better in terms of Livestream music? Like sending music from audio interface to your phone? Thank you in advance : )
Check out the Evo4 by Audient, that’s been designed for live-streaming and iOS Device recording. The new Volts from UA have been designed for this too but don’t come back with the Loopback software the EVO does.
@@EdThorne just checked out, your review is so clear! What do you think between the new Volts and this Audient? In terms of noise floor & preamps, and worthiness?
Good review Ed, I have the Audient iD14 original & it served me well for years of professional audio needs but now I own the Apollo Twin which is superior in every way. Both are great audio interfaces for thier price which is why I am keeping both 👌
@@reekrodriqguez6552 They are similar and also very different. One is great & the other is godly, I would use the Twin x any day over audient even though I own both!
Great vid. Would be nice if you could use RTL utility for round-trip latency test of the audio interfaces you review. RME babyface actually has half the latency round-trip compared to Focusrite scarlett at the same buffer size, which makes a huge difference while recording soft synths etc.. good drivers are a big deal! Eventually you'll end up with a great database of which interfaces rock and which only "jazz" ..Just a thought.. 😊
Thanks Erand. The reason I don’t bother with latency timings is because I use these interfaces with direct monitoring, through which there is no latency. I don’t route through my DAW for processed monitoring (main reason I use the Apollo systems for this). I get it would be useful from a soft synth point of view but I don’t use them so I’m not the best person to comment on that area. Also, everyone’ systems, DAWs, monitor routing, plugin setups etc are different. 🙂
@@EdThorne alright cool.. But the latency affects all audio interfaces when using any kind soft synths like serum etc. So it makes a huge impact on how playable they are. I have an Apollo myself and like it. It's good for tracking live stuff. But if was to get a new interface I'd go for something with better RTL doing edm and other ITB stuff..
@@eranddroory9987 The latency was tested in another, less thorough review. You can go down to around 4ms of roundtrip latency, 4.5ms at 16 samples, 48KHz, if I recall correctly; the latency go higher rather quickly if you bump up the sample rate, but this is to be expected. I do think this was tested on USB 3.1, not Thunderbolt 3, which makes latency problems virtually inexistent. If you're concerned about latency for such powerful VSTs as Serum, than you should definitely invest in a computer with Thunderbolt 3 if you haven't already! USB 3.0 is more than sufficient enough for most recording applications.
@@jas_bataille hi there. Usb 3 and Thunderbolt won't do anything much to latency. They both give more bandwidth but not speed. A testament to that is the RME baby face pro fs which is a usb 2.0 interface with one of the fastest RTL you can get. It's about the chipdet/ driver implementation. Usually RTL goes down a bit at higher clock speeds as the chips are running runs faster. Kinda like when you overclock a pc.. I have a Thunderbolt Apollo twin but I'm switching to rme because of the faster RTL and I rarely use the 800mhz ancient shark dsp in Apollo eco system 😊
I just opened up my studio for booking at my current office space where I usually just make beats. I've experienced latency with my scarlett 2i2 3rd gen and some static/vnyl noise coming out on vocals. I am still on a budget as I am currently spending $ on bills and other products. Im not really focusing on sessions with bands where I need so many input connections. The Mic I'm currently using is a Warm wa87. Is there a Audio Interface you recommend to use for now to upgrade from my Scarlett 2i2 3rd gen if the Apollo Twin is out the picture?
Hi Luis, The static/vinyl noise could be preamp saturation if you have the input signal too hot. It's always worth checking the mic cable too. A noticeable upgrade on the Scarlett preamps and definitely converters is the Clarett. The pres sound great, arguably better than the Apollo's, as you can hear here: ua-cam.com/video/IkuuxFvNB_g/v-deo.html And it's priced pretty much in between the Scarlett and the Apollo Twins.
To volt or not to volt. That is the question. Which one do you believe will be better for mixing. The volt 276 or the Audient? It is not just about recording, but being able to have clarity. As you guys say...thanks mate.
Sounds like you’re looking for the best conversion for mixing clarity. Tough one between these two but the Antelope stuff is probably the best for conversion (if you can stretch to a ZenGo)
can i use the interface without connecting to a DAW ? if i want to connect a line-in through the optical AND connect some analog inputs via XLR, can i hear everything mixed together through the headphone jacks or even through the analog outputs all at the same time ?
Im currently using a focusrite 18i16 1st gen with a UA twin 710 preamp. Im intersted in getting a newer interface and getting rid of the twin 710. Would that be a wrong move?
Great review Ed, as usual! But you know what I am waiting for.. ID14MKII VS rest of the world :-) Bell activated! Anyway this video has been made in a very professional way, you're doing great! You deserve more subscriptions! PS: the previous version of id14 hasn't a good reputation, and speaking about Audient, people suggest generally to go for id22 or id44, considering the cheapest series as not so good. Will this new version improve its reputation?
Thanks for the kind words 🙂🙏 I only hear good things from people about Audient - unless they’re on PC and have driver issues, but I hear this complaint across the board about every audio interface that requires drivers (a good enough reason alone to use Mac). A comparison against the Apollo Twin is on the way 🤘
@@EdThorne Yes Ed, I use windows, and the complaits are related to windows for the cheepest versions. Anyway I am looking forward to watching your comparison. If you decided to compare them, considering the big price difference between the two, I am waiting for good news :-)
Hi ! thank you for this detailed review ! The plug-ins package included call me to Scarlett or SSL 2 (promo until the 2021/12/31) or the next UA VOLT 276 ... Do you think they are a real benefits ? or possible to find as good free plug ins or low cost plug-ins for same pro-quality ? (i'm talking about, effects and dynamics plug-ins). i want to go to Motu M but only Digital performer, or this iD14Mk2 but not interesting bundle package for me.... Thank you for your advices !
I’m waiting for a Volt review unit to be sent to me (coming soon I believe) so can’t comment on that yet. I think the SSL interface has the best plugin bundle but I’m a big fan of the iD14mkii audio interface (and prefer it to the SSL).
@@EdThorne Thank you very much ! Yep, that's the dilemma ^^, package or functionality lol. The VOLT276 may be better than SSL in terms of audio quality and plug-in package but I think it won't be better than the ID 14 MK2 in terms of routing options/functionality...
High, I produce everything "in the box", I dont record audio, only VSTs instruments via usb keyboard and usb drum pad. Assuming that most of people (specially pop, electronic, rap/trap) will work at 44.100/24bit or 48.000/24bit, around 256 buffer size, "producing/mixing on the flow". What are the best options of audio interfaces in terms of RTL (round trip latency) Aiming for less than 10ms on those values? Or even, Do I need an interface? Cuz I saw the benchmarks and all audio interfaces will deliver around 12 to 14ms in 44.100/24bit and 256 buffer size. I have a RME Fireface UCX but I will probably sell it to upgrade from a 2011 mac mini to 2023 Mac Mini M2 Pro. Maybe I could get some interface max till U$299,00. I was thinking in one of these 3: Motu m4, Audient ID24 or SSL 2+.
Ed, would like to see your take on the new Antelope Synergy Go @ $500. Seems to have high quality and closer to UA features, though I am hesitant at this point due to Antelope's history.
I had the iD14 mkII for two weeks and it was very temperamental. No signal, static feedback, or the unit wasn’t recognized. Just got the Antelope Zen Go and for the extra $200 it’s leaps and bounds better and works every time.
@@TheCitizenArk I can only assume you’re on PC? The only complaints I hear about any interface is from PC users with driver issues. Unfortunately, I’m not a PC guy so I don’t know what to suggest, I’m sorry.
i only want to run pianoteq vst. is the id 4 (the little brother of the id14 in this video) the right choice or would you recommend something else. how high is latency on monitoring? if its high, should i buy the rme digiface for low latency?
If using a vst, it has more to do with buffer size and other asio settings to minimize latency ... I use keyscape without latency even before I got the id4 MK2... As for monitoring latency of inputs almost every interface has latency to some degree and that's why the feature of direct monitoring is given... Hope this helps.
Ey whatsup which one would u buy the id14mkii the ssl2+ or apollo solo??? i want record vocals with autotune eq compress i need the best sound for record
I'm in the market for an audio interface I used to have an ID14 the original version and the A-D conversion was truly excellent but the D-A conversion was just good. I tested it out alongside my Cambridge Audio DAC Magic 100 and the Cambridge Audio sounded clearer than the ID14 DAC. I don't have the ID14 anymore I sold it a a couple of years ago and my Cambridge Audio DAC Magic 100 is finally on it's last legs. The audio keeps cutting out and I have to turn it off and turn it back on, i've had it about 8 years so it's lasted well. But my biggest dilemma at the moment is, is the ID14mkII D-A converter as good as the Cambridge Audio DAC Magic 100, but that is a question no-one can seem to answer as no-one has both of them.
Hi there. I don’t have both so also can’t comment. It’s unlikely a multi-purpose Audio interface at this price point will compete with a designated DAC. Check out the Clarett + for great converters.
subscribed. I'm on the hunt for a Audio Interface i don't record any instruments or vocals. i work on house and techno tracks i also need two outputs for speakers i have 4 monitors I noticed 4 outputs in the back of this unit! Can they be use for 2 set of monitors?
Great review. After watching I did what most would do and googled the product. There seem to be a worrying number of folks having issues with the mk2 and Apple M1 chips, the worst part being Audients complete lack of customer service. Anyone experience anything like this ? This interface is so appealing but I am admittedly uneasy on the back of the above. Cheers for any insights.
Thanks, Rory. The iD14mkii is class complaint so will work without the need for any drivers on all Macs. The issues they may be referring to are possible with the iD Mixer App not being compatible with an M1 immediately after its release. I have no doubt Audient will have fixed this by now.
This looks great, I just wish all the controls and XLR inputs were on the front and not the top/back... I like my interface in a kind of "rack" under my monitors, easy to use when everything is on the front... I think I'm leaning towards the Scarlett 4i4 3rd Gen, but damn I'm curious about this one!
My monitors are low volume and the sound is a bit weak and narrow, like a headphone output. Output is the latest level, all settings, drivers are up to date, and monitor settings are so, why do you think?
I have the SSL2+. I did not like it for a couple of reasons. The buttons for 48+, Line and Hi z are super wobbly and give false contact, as soon as you pose your finger on the 48+ button, it activates or deactivates, same with the line button where it makes some noise if you play with the buttons a little to the sides, the construction of the ssl2+ it's just not the best. You just sold me the Audient. I wanted to ask you, The ssl has this gray knob for controlling the volume but it makes you decide on to what to hear the most, the Daw or the mic, does the audient hace the same? Or can you control the daw volume and input volume independently? I would really appreciate if you answered, i have not heard any of that on any video that ive seen so far!
Sorry to hear about your experience with the 2+. There is no DAW-Input volume balancing dial on the Audient’s, instead they have a really monitor control application that enables you to balance loads of individual outputs from your DAW and inputs. It’s a far superior monitoring system than most other interfaces in this price range.
The main difference would be inputs and outputs and then the fact that the id22 has pre amps that can be bypassed. Probably the only one in this price range. If you don't have an external pre Amp then you won't see too much of a difference as they both have the same built in preamps *to be specific*things the id22 has that the id14 mkii doesn't ADAT Output 2 extra line outputs 2 balanced insert points Individual Pad switches, Hi-Pass Filters, and Polarity Switches on the 2 inputs Dim & Cut Switches On Monitoring 3 User Programmable keys 1 extra cue mix
Let's say I want my TV sound to come out from my monitors (Yamaha HS5). Is it possible to use an optical cable from my TV (LG CX) to this particular interface and then let the sound come from my monitors instead? I'm currently using an M-Audio Air 192/4 and it is a nice looking interface. But it just lack in features and expansions.
@@EdThorne Hhahaha I asked beacuse I'm starting in this new world and have the budget for any of those, but couldn't find any comparison due to the fact that the focusrite 4rd gen dropped around a week ago.
Hello, thanks for this video and all the détails, i'm here because I want to replace my old (but great) Scarlet 2i2 1st gen. And I'm between this iD14 and the Motu M2/4, did you have the opportunity to compare to Motu since your prévious test video ?
@@jnaime Hi Jonathan. I haven’t used an M2/4 yet and their UK distributors don’t have any stock for me to review. If you require 5-pin MIDI connectivity, the M2 sounds like the way to go. If you’d like to expand your input channels, the ADAT expandability on the iD14 is a great choice. I am comparing the EVO 4 with the Scarlett this week and the Evo is kicking the 2i2s butt. And the iD14 is better still so you definitely won’t be disappointed with the upgrade 🙂 And regarding Zoom, the iD14 Mixer software has a digital Loopback feature built into it that works really well! It’s a smart addition to the interface!
@@EdThorne Hello Ed :) Thank you for your very quick and detailed answer ! Well I don't need MIDI connectivity and for now I don't need to expand input channel. I have my 2i2 since more than 6 year and I just want better quality for my 2 mics (AKG for my saxophone and AT2035 for speaking). So yes this ID14 seems to be a great updgrade !
I just switched from the m2 to the id14 Loved the m2 BUT I noticed…the higher I put up the headphone volume…the more distortion/degradation I got on my inputs. It’s very very subtle, but it’s happening nonetheless. At first I thought it could just be my unit but after sifting reddit/the internet I saw I wasn’t the only person with this problem. Like I said it is hardly noticeable…something you need to be listening hard and “testing” for but regardless, I don’t want it to be there.
With this, is there a way to be able to hear yourself without a headset? I have one in the mail on the way, but just curious..I'm hoping to use this for charity Streams and voice-over work.
You could with a wireless headphone system but there will inevitably be latency with the additional stages of conversion between the transceiver and receiver packs. Maybe there’s a Bluetooth dongle system out there.
Great question. You should be able to but you’d have to investigate how the TV routes the audio (how many channels it sends etc). Definitely worth asking Audient.
Nice one Ed. I might go and buy me one of these now! (Sold my Scarlett 2i2 to someone who needed it. I liked it. But the USBC socket got loose... crazily rubbish thing to happen!). Anyway. Are these 2 x pairs of outputs presented as 2 x discrete pairs of stereo audio outputs in windows? That's what I need for when I'm DJing. ;) (One output to PA. Other output just to headphones for cueing)
@@EdThorne Cool! The outputs being available in the mixer app. is one thing. But I wonder whether the 2 x pairs of outputs are available in a DAW. That would be great. Suppose I'll have to get one to find out!
I have a Lenovo laptop with Intel and it works flawlessly. I actually had a problem on my Ryzen desktop pc with the mixer lagging and volume at full on boot. I think those issues are mostly fixed now with firmware updates.
How does this compare to the Apollo solo?...I currently have the Focusrite but I have a Golden Age Pre 73 I run my mic thru as a preamp...I just need a good interface to keep the vocals clean and crisp the most possible going into the computer...
Comparison against the Apollo Twin coming this week. If you can stretch to an Apollo Twin X you can bypass the Apollo preamps to really hear your GA. but the Apollo preamps are definitely cleaner with less influence at minimum gain.
@@EdThorne I have a PC so I can’t get an Apollo X...I also dont want to spend that much money on a interface...i’ll do the Apollo solo price at the max...but in terms of quality for the vocals only...not including plugins included...how would the vocal quality of the Solo be worth double the price of the id14?...im looking to buy something now so it’s shipped during the week...i’ll still watch your video regardless lol...
@@EdThorne Ok i’ll order this...I currently have the Scarlett 2i2 but the id14 has 2 sets of monitor outputs I could use down the road...also figured with the id14 being newer and very popular as well for a interface...the converters are probably better and more i updated...if I dont notice a difference with my Scarlett then i’ll just send it back...thanks!...
The Solo is in another league in terms of monitoring flexibility with Console and Unison preamp modelling but it is very limited by its single DSP core. If you can stretch to a Twin, you’ll never regret your purchase.
what do I need as a new recorder that want to sing, do theatrical roles for animation film and audiobooks and some podcasts? I am thinking of getting either a Sontronics Corona or Orpheus or something different like the Shure 7B... But do I need a sound card to this between the mic and the mac or iPad? or something like the Volt 2 or Apollo Solo!? or should I instead go with this one you present in this video? Can someone please advice me so I take the right path down the road of home recording... thanks a lot for any and all input! 😊
@@SimplicityForGood Here’s what you need: ua-cam.com/video/yyPYapoJSv8/v-deo.html My advice would be to get the best products you can afford. You absolutely get what you pay for with home audio equipment!
@@EdThorne I agree../ but how would you choose if you could afford all three between the Audient iD mkii Audio and the Volt 2 or the Apollo Solo? Is the software to edit your music better with the Universal Audio that had something called Luna right? Or are you giving your vote to the Audient software instead? Of cousre, I rather spend an extra 100 dollar at a good mic than on a sound card, I guess!? 🤷🏼 but I am new to recording, so what do I know.. hah 😅 so pleqse advice me... I really need all input I can get and yes, I got a budget I need to deal with too... But my perspective is that if I buy stuff now to make sure they are kind of future-proof the coming five years at least down the road of starting to work as a vocalist/ voice actor... ✌🏻😊
@@SimplicityForGood The Apollo’s come with LUNA (technically not a DAW(yet) but a very good recording system). The Audient comes with Cubase (personally I MUCH prefer Logic). The Apollo Solo is a great interface and comes with Console which is THE BEST monitor mixing app on the market but the interface is fundamentally flawed (IMO) by only having 1 DSP core meaning you can use many USD plugins to record through or monitor with. What’s your budget? And primary need (vocals/acoustic/DI’d guitars etc)
I have id14 mkii, look good but it has problem with volume restart, volume knob is encoder. Support doesn't help with it. On redit people write about it also.
It’s an encoder to facilitate all the other functions the volume knob is used for (all outputs volumes, and assignable iD button scroll wheel function etc)
@@EdThorne Exactly but every-time you restart computer the volume is restarted to 0, after all restart you have to volume up. Any other interface keeps it. I sent to official service but they claims that it is desired behavior, nice. Their online help also doesn't respond with solution.
I just want to know this,...Can this iD14mkii allow me to utilize an EQ for my mic? I want this strictly for my Voice Over work and nothing else and all I want is to be able to EQ the mic through the interface to get the sound I want BEFORE I start recording. Basically I'm asking is there at least one simple plugin that comes with this device that allows for voice EQ?
No. This interface does not have the required DSP to process the audio before it hits the converters. For this you will need an Apollo Twin or Neumann MT48 interface (these are the ones I recommend).
Why in hell did Audient integrate 2 mic inputs and only 1 guitar??? And not vice versa? In my case I often record 1 guitar and need two inputs --> One for DI and 1 main input.
@@EdThorne I would like the apollo but I currently have no budget for it. If between SSL 2+ and id14 you recommend ud14, I'll go for it. Thanks for your recommendation 🙌
@@letanhai445 You'll be fine then if they're 250Ohms. This video explains how the mkii is better (mostly improved converters). It's a very good interface!
I'm no expert by any means, but it seems like he is downplaying the weaknesses and up-playing the strengths, i.e., it distorts, but it doesn't matter, and the headphones required almost full power, yet somehow doesn't distort? IDK.
The outputs on all interfaces distort at a deafening level - ie, it doesn’t matter because you won’t be mixing anywhere near that level. And The headphone amp requires almost full power with high impedance headphones which need more power to drive them, as most do. With low impedance headphones, again, the output can distort but at a level way higher than you would practically need. This is common on all interfaces.
Most of these budget friendly devices have decent converters considering the price, but if you want to up the game from this/the M2, go for the Focusrite Clarett, Antelope ZenGo, or UA Apollo interfaces.
Anything I can help with? They’re class compliant so should show up in your DAW by just plugging it in. Then make sure you have your channel routing in the iD software and DAW correct.
I can’t get hold of one. I have spoken to the distributors and they’re out of stock. I could potentially buy one from a shop (if they have residual stock) and return it once I’ve done the review. I know Motu is good. I used to own an 828mkii. For me the ADAT expandability would be important. ADAT over MIDI but a lot of people are saying the opposite 🙂
@@EdThorne yeah. If you need the ADAT expandability, the Audient iD14 is definitely the star in this general price range. It's a great interface, no doubt!
Eh, been there, done that; got the M4 when it came out of the Covid shadow a few months ago. I love doing vocals with stereo track backing. So I thought, well, I can connect my cell phone or tablet out via a split 1/4" cable to the Line inputs of the M4. NO GO. Those Line Level inputs can only take inputs from Line Level outs like from mixers. I thought, duh, I already have a mixer with USB (Mackie ProFX6V3); why the heck do I need the MOTU M4 then? So I regretfully returned it to Sweetwater. Fast forward a few months, and I just got the Audient EVO 8 from Sweetwater. To my delight, I can use two of the 4 Combo inputs to connect my cell phone! I just run the Auto Gain for those two lines. Oh, I can push the buttons on Lines 3 and 4 and make a stereo input! Hot dog! Then I plug in a microphone and I'm good to got. And even better, I can save all the settings on the EVO software mixer as a preset, so easy to bring up the next time I decide to record a vocal. Just one thing: I have to turn the Mic Preamp volume all the way to the max to get a decent mic volume with the EVO 8. But what is SO STRANGE, is that on my DAW (Cakewalk), I add a Reverb Plug-In, then turn "Echo" on, and wow, I almost fell off my chair! The Mic sensitivity went up 300%, and I could even hear the creaking of my chair! Seriously I have to sit still so my chair won't creak while recording! Unreal; no idea why this happens but hey, no complaints, I'm delighted! Though, I must say, the Mic Pre-Amps on my ProFX6V3 are much more sensitive.
@@OnlineMD different needs I guess. I wouldn't want to connect my phone. I can either use the extra two inputs with my external preamps, or to feed back in after going out to analog gear from the extra two outs. Another notable feature of the M4 is that the digital to analog convertors are unusually high end for a interface in this range..... Great for bussing out for analog. The M4 is the perfect unit for me in this price range.i suppose I could use my phone with my outboard pres but I literally can't ever see myself doing that! Whatever works for your setup and workflow. I really like the sound of the M4. Doesn't sound entry level at all.
🎬EVO by AUDIENT START RECORDING BUNDLE: ua-cam.com/video/Efq_rFa9rdc/v-deo.html
💲 BUY the AUDIENT iD14 mkii
Sweetwater: imp.i114863.net/DV0jo5
Thomann: redir.love/thoprod/510533?offid=1&affid=707
@@KallusGarnet Great question. Contact details are on my website: www.EdThorne.com :-)
Do this work well on windows 10
This review is the best one out there for this product, thanks a lot!
High five to that, thank you! :-)
such a good video, thank you thank you thank you for the hard work you put into these!
You’re more than welcome. Thanks for watching, Drew 😊🙏
I just bought this beast today to enhance my work. I think its worth it. Hopefully my contents will get better sound.
Ed, I had been struggling to make a decision between the Audient ID 14mkii , the scarlett 2i2 and the EVO 8 and I literally just purchased the Audient ID 14mkii based on your other comparison videos and the this Review. I can't wait to get started. Thank you Ed. Great videos by the way. I'm a fan!
Thank you, Luis! I’m glad they’re helpful. 🙂
Hey! I just got this system myself....how did this go for you over the last 10 months?
Great presentation Ed👏🏽👏🏽✌🏽
Thanks Warren 🙂 How are you my friend?
@@EdThorne Doing well thanks 🙏🏽
i have this audio interface! i love it!!! its super high quality!
I have the ID14 and just got the ASP800. Building a full system with the ID14 using the ADAT port was simple and expanded the number of mic inputs The quality of the preamps is the best
I assume you’re a drummer, too? 😜
@@EdThorne Actually my son-in-law is the drummer. Doing some live recordings of his band and one thing leads to another.
That phamtom power is what really sells it for me as well.
I just got mine and it's amazing!! Feature packed, built as a tank, sounds incredible on speakers or headphones.
many thanks
You can always trust someone who mixes on neumann kh120 hehe , nice video man !!
Ha. Thanks 🙂🙏
Thank you
8:29
I second this
I do 100% agree
Best regards
Yeh man! PLAPA’s a fantastic resource!
This is excellent review. Can you please compare it to the black lion revolution 2x2. Thank you
Here’s my review of the BLA. Personally I didn’t like it and the iD14mkii is far more useful.
ua-cam.com/video/pWota05jNpY/v-deo.html
always great reviews thank you. I am looking at upgradiing my gen 3 scarlett in 2024 up to this price range, wondering if he id14 mk II is still the best option, with the new interfaces and upgrades over the last year or so. still looks like it to me, but will you be doing any updated interface reviews soon for small home studios, like this, I only find them from 2 - 3 years ago.
Jezz I love the intro
Haha. I couldn’t resist 🤘
Excellent video.
There is any audient soundcard with midi in/out????
Best review
Thanks 😊🙏
Amazing interface. The conversion snd preamps are clean as liquid!😅
Great bro! Thanks for the review! Does this interface include fender amp simulations for clean tones? Have a nice day!!!
ID14 itself has cleanest sound. No other interface can match with it. It is industrial recommended.
Super helpful vid. Thanks Ed. I'm so close to buying one of these. I like everything about them. But, I recently heard that some folks have the experience of them going kaput after a year or so of use. Do you have any insight about this possible issue?
Thanks, Patrick, I hope it was helpful. I haven’t heard of units dying on people.
Next time if you could include the RTL it would be very helpful and thank you.
The problem is it doesn’t have low cut like Apollo and it does make a big difference when recording clean noise floor with low cut I can see the db meter is much lower when low cut engaged vs audient no low cut
Thank you very much for the video, I will buy the Audient iD14. I will only work with mixing and mastering and recording vocals and guitar. I'm starting now and I think it will suit me very well according to your video.
I really liked your image quality, which camera are you using?
I bought this and plan to record synth, guitar and vocals (maybe). I use lots of pedal effects. Will this start clipping the inputs quicker? Also I assume it can run the DT 990 pro from beyerdynamic? I was having problems with my volt 2 and it's headphone output sounding awful with the 990s but the rear outputs were fine.
Great review. How does the Audient id14 mk11 compare to the SSL 2+?
Thanks. I've not had access to an SSL since my Top Ten Audio Interface video but I don't remember the SSL sounding as good as the iD14mki, and this is definitely an improvement on that. Plus, for me, ADAT input is important. iD14mkii Vs UA Apollo video coming soon.
Hey Ed, one question, that ADAT input works with any preamp with ADAT connection? or it only works with audient preamps? Great review!
Good question, it works with any ADAT connection, it's not brand specific.
Great review, I am tempted to buy one of these but the Motu M2 has thrown me into doubt; would be great if you could review the Motu!
I have this comparison in the works right now! I’d go with the Audient unless you need fast RTLs.
@@EdThorne Thanks Ed, I have an extensive experience in these things having been senior engineer at Roland UK and working at Yamaha and Alesis UK (I also modify DAC circuitry nowadays). I feel that as a marketing ploy the M2 is made to enhance the low end at the expense of he high (this is very easily done by changing capacitor and resistor values after the DAC. I feel that the Audient may well be cleaner and more true to the original signal. I don't see the point in adding colouration to the input like the Volt and SSLs do (way better to do this with Software which can be undone later in the DAW).
@@delatronics3257 Ny experience is slightly different. I find the M2 quite neutral, almost weak in the low end. The Audient is definitely more coloured. To my ears at least, in my studio anyway.
@@EdThorne That's weird, I've watched hours of comparisons from different channels and I don't perceive that. Unfortunately I was locked out of the UK due to travel restrictions early in 2021 and now live in Brazil, we don't yet have a fully working Amazon where you can buy multiple interfaces and return free of charge; here, you only ever get 3 months guarantee even on new products, and once they are in your possession it is hard to return and get your money back. I trust your opinions over those in other channels, so I will be keenly awaiting your views on the M2 before pulling the trigger on the ID14 mkii.
I just switched to the ID14 from the Motu. Loved the M2 BUT I noticed…the higher I put up the headphone volume…the more distortion/degradation I got on my inputs. It’s very very subtle, but it’s happening nonetheless. At first I thought it could just be my unit but after sifting reddit/the internet I saw I wasn’t the only person with this problem. Like I said it is hardly noticeable…something you need to be listening hard and “testing” for but regardless, I don’t want it to be there.
i only clicked on this cause he looked like handsome squidward in the thumbnail. either way, great video! i know which interface i'm getting!
Haha. What’s a squidward? 🤣 Glad you liked the video, thanks.
😂😂😂
Hi Ed. Thanks for the informative video. I am buying this today! One question, can I link my Focusrite Saffire Pro 40 via Adat or does it only work with the Audient ASP800? I've recently upgraded my Mac and it has made the Saffire Pro 40 redundant due to not having firewire ports
In theory you should be able to connect any ADAT device.
@@EdThorne Thanks Ed. I thought as much. This makes this purchase a must have for me.
all things aside, the main gears i aspire to have are UAD La610 and Teletronix 2A and the SSL Bus Comp.
Oh, the LA2A would be lovely! They’re about £5k now though 😫🥴
What do you Think which one is the best of those interfaces:
This auident that you reviewed
The new Clarett+
The Appolo solo.
Thank like so much you channel
Tough one, they all have different strengths. I think Clarett is the best in terms of preamps and converters, plus it’s ADAT expandable. The iD14 is competitive because of the price and ID monitor app. The Solo has Console, which is by the far the best monitor processing app on the market. So it depends what you need.
Hey Ed, may I have your opinion? Between Yamaha AG06 and this Audient iD14 MK2, which one is better in terms of Livestream music? Like sending music from audio interface to your phone? Thank you in advance : )
Check out the Evo4 by Audient, that’s been designed for live-streaming and iOS Device recording. The new Volts from UA have been designed for this too but don’t come back with the Loopback software the EVO does.
@@EdThorne just checked out, your review is so clear! What do you think between the new Volts and this Audient? In terms of noise floor & preamps, and worthiness?
I really want to like the id14mk2 but I purchased and returned 2 units. They both were broken in different ways
Good review Ed, I have the Audient iD14 original & it served me well for years of professional audio needs but now I own the Apollo Twin which is superior in every way. Both are great audio interfaces for thier price which is why I am keeping both 👌
Preamps-wise, what’s the difference in sound quality?
Yeh the Apollo is another league up. iD14 is great for the money.
@@EdThorne but how you’d think the Apollo would do against the MK2 version?
@@reekrodriqguez6552 This comparison is happening soon but obviously the monitoring DSP is significant 🙂🤘
@@reekrodriqguez6552 They are similar and also very different. One is great & the other is godly, I would use the Twin x any day over audient even though I own both!
Great vid. Would be nice if you could use RTL utility for round-trip latency test of the audio interfaces you review. RME babyface actually has half the latency round-trip compared to Focusrite scarlett at the same buffer size, which makes a huge difference while recording soft synths etc.. good drivers are a big deal! Eventually you'll end up with a great database of which interfaces rock and which only "jazz" ..Just a thought.. 😊
Thanks Erand. The reason I don’t bother with latency timings is because I use these interfaces with direct monitoring, through which there is no latency. I don’t route through my DAW for processed monitoring (main reason I use the Apollo systems for this). I get it would be useful from a soft synth point of view but I don’t use them so I’m not the best person to comment on that area. Also, everyone’ systems, DAWs, monitor routing, plugin setups etc are different. 🙂
@@EdThorne alright cool..
But the latency affects all audio interfaces when using any kind soft synths like serum etc. So it makes a huge impact on how playable they are. I have an Apollo myself and like it. It's good for tracking live stuff. But if was to get a new interface I'd go for something with better RTL doing edm and other ITB stuff..
@@eranddroory9987 The latency was tested in another, less thorough review. You can go down to around 4ms of roundtrip latency, 4.5ms at 16 samples, 48KHz, if I recall correctly; the latency go higher rather quickly if you bump up the sample rate, but this is to be expected. I do think this was tested on USB 3.1, not Thunderbolt 3, which makes latency problems virtually inexistent. If you're concerned about latency for such powerful VSTs as Serum, than you should definitely invest in a computer with Thunderbolt 3 if you haven't already! USB 3.0 is more than sufficient enough for most recording applications.
@@jas_bataille hi there. Usb 3 and Thunderbolt won't do anything much to latency. They both give more bandwidth but not speed. A testament to that is the RME baby face pro fs which is a usb 2.0 interface with one of the fastest RTL you can get. It's about the chipdet/ driver implementation.
Usually RTL goes down a bit at higher clock speeds as the chips are running runs faster. Kinda like when you overclock a pc..
I have a Thunderbolt Apollo twin but I'm switching to rme because of the faster RTL and I rarely use the 800mhz ancient shark dsp in Apollo eco system 😊
rme is my choice when the Service and latency plus driver is not on top ....some comments suggest some problems...bit the price sounds good..
I just opened up my studio for booking at my current office space where I usually just make beats. I've experienced latency with my scarlett 2i2 3rd gen and some static/vnyl noise coming out on vocals. I am still on a budget as I am currently spending $ on bills and other products. Im not really focusing on sessions with bands where I need so many input connections. The Mic I'm currently using is a Warm wa87. Is there a Audio Interface you recommend to use for now to upgrade from my Scarlett 2i2 3rd gen if the Apollo Twin is out the picture?
Hi Luis,
The static/vinyl noise could be preamp saturation if you have the input signal too hot. It's always worth checking the mic cable too. A noticeable upgrade on the Scarlett preamps and definitely converters is the Clarett. The pres sound great, arguably better than the Apollo's, as you can hear here: ua-cam.com/video/IkuuxFvNB_g/v-deo.html And it's priced pretty much in between the Scarlett and the Apollo Twins.
To volt or not to volt. That is the question. Which one do you believe will be better for mixing. The volt 276 or the Audient?
It is not just about recording, but being able to have clarity.
As you guys say...thanks mate.
Sounds like you’re looking for the best conversion for mixing clarity. Tough one between these two but the Antelope stuff is probably the best for conversion (if you can stretch to a ZenGo)
Volt doesn't offer adat/optical inpu, if I remember well. Volt is good for podcasting but I think audient mkii are more music production oriented.
can i use the interface without connecting to a DAW ? if i want to connect a line-in through the optical AND connect some analog inputs via XLR, can i hear everything mixed together through the headphone jacks or even through the analog outputs all at the same time ?
Im currently using a focusrite 18i16 1st gen with a UA twin 710 preamp. Im intersted in getting a newer interface and getting rid of the twin 710. Would that be a wrong move?
how does it compare to motu m4
Great review Ed, as usual! But you know what I am waiting for.. ID14MKII VS rest of the world :-)
Bell activated! Anyway this video has been made in a very professional way, you're doing great!
You deserve more subscriptions!
PS: the previous version of id14 hasn't a good reputation, and speaking about Audient, people suggest generally to go for id22 or id44, considering the cheapest series as not so good.
Will this new version improve its reputation?
Thanks for the kind words 🙂🙏 I only hear good things from people about Audient - unless they’re on PC and have driver issues, but I hear this complaint across the board about every audio interface that requires drivers (a good enough reason alone to use Mac). A comparison against the Apollo Twin is on the way 🤘
@@EdThorne Yes Ed, I use windows, and the complaits are related to windows for the cheepest versions. Anyway I am looking forward to watching your comparison. If you decided to compare them, considering the big price difference between the two, I am waiting for good news :-)
@@EdThorne yes I was talking about the comparison between id14 and apollo twin :-)
Can you please do a comparison with the presonus 24c and the volt 2, or is the Audient just better anyway? Thanks!
I'm not a fan of the Presonus interfaces and would recommend the Audient or Volts.
Hi ! thank you for this detailed review ! The plug-ins package included call me to Scarlett or SSL 2 (promo until the 2021/12/31) or the next UA VOLT 276 ... Do you think they are a real benefits ? or possible to find as good free plug ins or low cost plug-ins for same pro-quality ? (i'm talking about, effects and dynamics plug-ins). i want to go to Motu M but only Digital performer, or this iD14Mk2 but not interesting bundle package for me.... Thank you for your advices !
I’m waiting for a Volt review unit to be sent to me (coming soon I believe) so can’t comment on that yet. I think the SSL interface has the best plugin bundle but I’m a big fan of the iD14mkii audio interface (and prefer it to the SSL).
@@EdThorne Thank you very much ! Yep, that's the dilemma ^^, package or functionality lol. The VOLT276 may be better than SSL in terms of audio quality and plug-in package but I think it won't be better than the ID 14 MK2 in terms of routing options/functionality...
@@dawoud8013 I suspect this will be the case too. You can always buy plugins - I’d get the best interface for your needs.
Hi, If you kwon that interface has some problems with Windows 10 driver? Thank a lot
High, I produce everything "in the box", I dont record audio, only VSTs instruments via usb keyboard and usb drum pad. Assuming that most of people (specially pop, electronic, rap/trap) will work at 44.100/24bit or 48.000/24bit, around 256 buffer size, "producing/mixing on the flow". What are the best options of audio interfaces in terms of RTL (round trip latency) Aiming for less than 10ms on those values? Or even, Do I need an interface? Cuz I saw the benchmarks and all audio interfaces will deliver around 12 to 14ms in 44.100/24bit and 256 buffer size. I have a RME Fireface UCX but I will probably sell it to upgrade from a 2011 mac mini to 2023 Mac Mini M2 Pro. Maybe I could get some interface max till U$299,00. I was thinking in one of these 3: Motu m4, Audient ID24 or SSL 2+.
Ed, would like to see your take on the new Antelope Synergy Go @ $500.
Seems to have high quality and closer to UA features, though I am hesitant at this point due to Antelope's history.
Ive seen these too and they look great. I will see about getting hold of one 🙂
@@EdThorne Really hoping to see a comparison between these two interfaces as well.
I had the iD14 mkII for two weeks and it was very temperamental. No signal, static feedback, or the unit wasn’t recognized. Just got the Antelope Zen Go and for the extra $200 it’s leaps and bounds better and works every time.
@@TheCitizenArk
Are you using with Windows or Mac?
@@TheCitizenArk I can only assume you’re on PC? The only complaints I hear about any interface is from PC users with driver issues. Unfortunately, I’m not a PC guy so I don’t know what to suggest, I’m sorry.
i wish it looked like the UA Volt 276
Hey man! How do you find the Audient vs the clarett 2pre?
The Clarett arguably has better pres and converters but I much prefer the Audient monitoring (app), and the assignable iD button is useful.
Hi! Thanks for this review. Any noticeable difference with the ID4 mkII besides the amount of inputs/outputs?
Increase dynamic range on the conversion. I cover this in the video 🙂
i only want to run pianoteq vst. is the id 4 (the little brother of the id14 in this video)
the right choice or would you recommend something else.
how high is latency on monitoring?
if its high, should i buy the rme digiface for low latency?
If using a vst, it has more to do with buffer size and other asio settings to minimize latency ... I use keyscape without latency even before I got the id4 MK2... As for monitoring latency of inputs almost every interface has latency to some degree and that's why the feature of direct monitoring is given... Hope this helps.
Ey whatsup which one would u buy the id14mkii the ssl2+ or apollo solo??? i want record vocals with autotune eq compress i need the best sound for record
Hi, I’d would either buy iD14mkii OR an Apollo Twin. The Solo doesn’t have enough DSP imo.
since it dont have power supply ... wondering whats the max lenght of the USB cable and still provide all power to the preamps ?
I couldn't give a definitive answer but I suspect there's a reason most are not above 2m in length.
So is zero latency monitoring possible ?
I'm in the market for an audio interface I used to have an ID14 the original version and the A-D conversion was truly excellent but the D-A conversion was just good. I tested it out alongside my Cambridge Audio DAC Magic 100 and the Cambridge Audio sounded clearer than the ID14 DAC. I don't have the ID14 anymore I sold it a a couple of years ago and my Cambridge Audio DAC Magic 100 is finally on it's last legs. The audio keeps cutting out and I have to turn it off and turn it back on, i've had it about 8 years so it's lasted well. But my biggest dilemma at the moment is, is the ID14mkII D-A converter as good as the Cambridge Audio DAC Magic 100, but that is a question no-one can seem to answer as no-one has both of them.
Hi there. I don’t have both so also can’t comment. It’s unlikely a multi-purpose Audio interface at this price point will compete with a designated DAC. Check out the Clarett + for great converters.
@@EdThorne Yeah that was my thought too, I was thinking to get as good DAC i'd have to go with something like the Antelope Audio Zen Synergy Go.
subscribed. I'm on the hunt for a Audio Interface i don't record any instruments or vocals. i work on house and techno tracks i also need two outputs for speakers i have 4 monitors I noticed 4 outputs in the back of this unit! Can they be use for 2 set of monitors?
Yes they can. And you can swap between the two using the iD button.
Id14 or steinberg ur rt2?
Great review. After watching I did what most would do and googled the product. There seem to be a worrying number of folks having issues with the mk2 and Apple M1 chips, the worst part being Audients complete lack of customer service. Anyone experience anything like this ? This interface is so appealing but I am admittedly uneasy on the back of the above. Cheers for any insights.
Thanks, Rory. The iD14mkii is class complaint so will work without the need for any drivers on all Macs. The issues they may be referring to are possible with the iD Mixer App not being compatible with an M1 immediately after its release. I have no doubt Audient will have fixed this by now.
dont have any problems on m1
@@freebeat2289 yo bro!!!
Just bought id4 mk2 and im using m1 air. I have a problem with input/daw knob, when I’m using it sounds start cracking. Wtf
This looks great, I just wish all the controls and XLR inputs were on the front and not the top/back... I like my interface in a kind of "rack" under my monitors, easy to use when everything is on the front... I think I'm leaning towards the Scarlett 4i4 3rd Gen, but damn I'm curious about this one!
Yeh the desktop style doesn’t suit everyone. An alternative ‘rack style’ one I’d suggest is the Tascam HD. Sounds great!
looking for an all in one audio interface for gaming/streaming. will this device power my hifiman edition xs or should i consider a seperate dac/amp?
It’s a decent HP amp but of course a designated amp, such as a Topping, would be superior. Will be fine for most applications.
@@EdThorne you rock, thanks so much for the quick reply
My monitors are low volume and the sound is a bit weak and narrow, like a headphone output. Output is the latest level, all settings, drivers are up to date, and monitor settings are so, why do you think?
Sound like it’s coming out in Mono. Is there a mono setting in the iD App (I can’t remember off the top of my head right now)?
I have the SSL2+. I did not like it for a couple of reasons. The buttons for 48+, Line and Hi z are super wobbly and give false contact, as soon as you pose your finger on the 48+ button, it activates or deactivates, same with the line button where it makes some noise if you play with the buttons a little to the sides, the construction of the ssl2+ it's just not the best. You just sold me the Audient. I wanted to ask you, The ssl has this gray knob for controlling the volume but it makes you decide on to what to hear the most, the Daw or the mic, does the audient hace the same? Or can you control the daw volume and input volume independently? I would really appreciate if you answered, i have not heard any of that on any video that ive seen so far!
Sorry to hear about your experience with the 2+. There is no DAW-Input volume balancing dial on the Audient’s, instead they have a really monitor control application that enables you to balance loads of individual outputs from your DAW and inputs. It’s a far superior monitoring system than most other interfaces in this price range.
@EdThorne thanks for the answer, i just watched all your videos containing the audient that i could hear this with your voice haha!
ID14 Mkii vs ID22...There are any differences between those in sound quality aspect?
The main difference would be inputs and outputs and then the fact that the id22 has pre amps that can be bypassed. Probably the only one in this price range. If you don't have an external pre Amp then you won't see too much of a difference as they both have the same built in preamps
*to be specific*things the id22 has that the id14 mkii doesn't
ADAT Output
2 extra line outputs
2 balanced insert points
Individual Pad switches, Hi-Pass Filters, and Polarity Switches on the 2 inputs
Dim & Cut Switches On Monitoring
3 User Programmable keys
1 extra cue mix
Let's say I want my TV sound to come out from my monitors (Yamaha HS5). Is it possible to use an optical cable from my TV (LG CX) to this particular interface and then let the sound come from my monitors instead? I'm currently using an M-Audio Air 192/4 and it is a nice looking interface. But it just lack in features and expansions.
Yes. The tv SHOULD show up as an ADAT device and you’ll be able to mix in accordingly. You’ll need to do this in the iD Mixing App.
Oh cool! I might just buy this interface then.
i have an windows PC so i would need an adapter for the usb C what consequences does that come with?
There’s a segment about USB-C vs A cables in this video (see chapters): ua-cam.com/video/EkwWzJa-i4M/v-deo.html
Is the audient id14 mkii any good for the yamaha HS8 speakers?
The Audient is great for all speakers 🙂 Also check out the Adam T5V speakers 🔥
What do you think about the Audient ID4MK2 against the Focustrite Solo 4rd gen???
This is proving to be a very popular question and one I endeavour to answer in a video soon.
@@EdThorne Hhahaha I asked beacuse I'm starting in this new world and have the budget for any of those, but couldn't find any comparison due to the fact that the focusrite 4rd gen dropped around a week ago.
How do I cancel the loopback form my input routing?
Re-assign the input to default or elsewhere.
Hello, thanks for this video and all the détails, i'm here because I want to replace my old (but great) Scarlet 2i2 1st gen. And I'm between this iD14 and the Motu M2/4, did you have the opportunity to compare to Motu since your prévious test video ?
And can you use the ID mixer software for exemple application like Zoom ? Or do you absolutely need an analog mixer ?
@@jnaime Hi Jonathan. I haven’t used an M2/4 yet and their UK distributors don’t have any stock for me to review. If you require 5-pin MIDI connectivity, the M2 sounds like the way to go. If you’d like to expand your input channels, the ADAT expandability on the iD14 is a great choice.
I am comparing the EVO 4 with the Scarlett this week and the Evo is kicking the 2i2s butt. And the iD14 is better still so you definitely won’t be disappointed with the upgrade 🙂
And regarding Zoom, the iD14 Mixer software has a digital Loopback feature built into it that works really well! It’s a smart addition to the interface!
@@EdThorne Hello Ed :) Thank you for your very quick and detailed answer ! Well I don't need MIDI connectivity and for now I don't need to expand input channel. I have my 2i2 since more than 6 year and I just want better quality for my 2 mics (AKG for my saxophone and AT2035 for speaking). So yes this ID14 seems to be a great updgrade !
I just switched from the m2 to the id14
Loved the m2 BUT I noticed…the higher I put up the headphone volume…the more distortion/degradation I got on my inputs. It’s very very subtle, but it’s happening nonetheless. At first I thought it could just be my unit but after sifting reddit/the internet I saw I wasn’t the only person with this problem. Like I said it is hardly noticeable…something you need to be listening hard and “testing” for but regardless, I don’t want it to be there.
@@joeylo Thanks for your feedback, I did not change my Focusrite yet finally, But clearly when I will, it'll be for a ID14 :)
With this, is there a way to be able to hear yourself without a headset? I have one in the mail on the way, but just curious..I'm hoping to use this for charity Streams and voice-over work.
You could with a wireless headphone system but there will inevitably be latency with the additional stages of conversion between the transceiver and receiver packs. Maybe there’s a Bluetooth dongle system out there.
If you have a TV with optical out, can you connect that TV to this audio interface?
Great question. You should be able to but you’d have to investigate how the TV routes the audio (how many channels it sends etc). Definitely worth asking Audient.
@@EdThorne thanks for the response :)
Nice one Ed. I might go and buy me one of these now! (Sold my Scarlett 2i2 to someone who needed it. I liked it. But the USBC socket got loose... crazily rubbish thing to happen!).
Anyway. Are these 2 x pairs of outputs presented as 2 x discrete pairs of stereo audio outputs in windows? That's what I need for when I'm DJing. ;)
(One output to PA. Other output just to headphones for cueing)
Thanks Phil. Yeh, they’re independent outputs, controllable in the mixer app.
@@EdThorne Cool!
The outputs being available in the mixer app. is one thing. But I wonder whether the 2 x pairs of outputs are available in a DAW. That would be great. Suppose I'll have to get one to find out!
@@philiphatch7094 Yes, they're available in the DAW too. It's literally the best interface in its class! :-)
@@EdThorne aw amazing! That's the one then cheers ears!
Is there any decent interface that works on a Mac without thunderbolt 3 ?
Get a USB-C to A adaptor. A lot come with different cables.
What is the difference between this and a focusrite solo mk3?
Better preamps, converters, headphone amp, and monitor control (software).
I wonder if this would be good with my Lenovo laptop and Studio One.... Ed?
Should be, an interface doesn’t discriminate 😉 I don’t use PC though so I can’t comment for the driver stability.
I have a Lenovo laptop with Intel and it works flawlessly. I actually had a problem on my Ryzen desktop pc with the mixer lagging and volume at full on boot. I think those issues
are mostly fixed now with firmware updates.
How does this compare to the Apollo solo?...I currently have the Focusrite but I have a Golden Age Pre 73 I run my mic thru as a preamp...I just need a good interface to keep the vocals clean and crisp the most possible going into the computer...
Comparison against the Apollo Twin coming this week. If you can stretch to an Apollo Twin X you can bypass the Apollo preamps to really hear your GA. but the Apollo preamps are definitely cleaner with less influence at minimum gain.
@@EdThorne I have a PC so I can’t get an Apollo X...I also dont want to spend that much money on a interface...i’ll do the Apollo solo price at the max...but in terms of quality for the vocals only...not including plugins included...how would the vocal quality of the Solo be worth double the price of the id14?...im looking to buy something now so it’s shipped during the week...i’ll still watch your video regardless lol...
@@minusx31 If you don’t need the UAD monitoring with UAD plugins, the Audient is a great choice.
@@EdThorne Ok i’ll order this...I currently have the Scarlett 2i2 but the id14 has 2 sets of monitor outputs I could use down the road...also figured with the id14 being newer and very popular as well for a interface...the converters are probably better and more i updated...if I dont notice a difference with my Scarlett then i’ll just send it back...thanks!...
I just used your Sweetwater link to buy that interface and 2 mogami TRS cables...hopefully you get a cut!...
How does this compare to UA Apollo Solo? If money wasn't an issue?
The Solo is in another league in terms of monitoring flexibility with Console and Unison preamp modelling but it is very limited by its single DSP core. If you can stretch to a Twin, you’ll never regret your purchase.
@@EdThorne ooo I was thinking of that too! Just def more costly haha! What about this vs the new Volt 276?
@@EdThorne Yeah ive been looking into stretching into the Twin for that very reason! I do both podcasting, youtube and music recording.
naissssss... this vs ssl 2+? in terms of AD - DA converters?
This would be a good test. I no longer have my SSL so I can’t make the comparison unfortunately.
@@EdThorne you sell it?
@@FFStudioMy I bought it on a credit card to do my Top Ten interfaces under $300 review last year and then returned it to get the money back 🤣
@@EdThorne hahahahaah..ok..wont ask anymore..
@@EdThorne 🤣 yes... normal ^^
Can we connect midi keyboard with this audient id14?
No midi connections so no.
what do I need as a new recorder that want to sing, do theatrical roles for animation film and audiobooks and some podcasts?
I am thinking of getting either a Sontronics Corona or Orpheus or something different like the Shure 7B... But do I need a sound card to this between the mic and the mac or iPad?
or something like the Volt 2 or Apollo Solo!?
or should I instead go with this one you present in this video?
Can someone please advice me so I take the right path down the road of home recording... thanks a lot for any and all input!
😊
I’ve replied to your comment on the other video 🙂
@@EdThorne how strange, my comments does not show it here on youtube...
maybe Audient is a better choice...
Can you link me please...
@@SimplicityForGood Here’s what you need: ua-cam.com/video/yyPYapoJSv8/v-deo.html
My advice would be to get the best products you can afford. You absolutely get what you pay for with home audio equipment!
@@EdThorne I agree../ but how would you choose if you could afford all three between the Audient iD mkii Audio and the Volt 2 or the Apollo Solo?
Is the software to edit your music better with the Universal Audio that had something called Luna right? Or are you giving your vote to the Audient software instead?
Of cousre, I rather spend an extra 100 dollar at a good mic than on a sound card, I guess!? 🤷🏼 but I am new to recording, so what do I know.. hah 😅 so pleqse advice me... I really need all input I can get and yes, I got a budget I need to deal with too... But my perspective is that if I buy stuff now to make sure they are kind of future-proof the coming five years at least down the road of starting to work as a vocalist/ voice actor... ✌🏻😊
@@SimplicityForGood The Apollo’s come with LUNA (technically not a DAW(yet) but a very good recording system). The Audient comes with Cubase (personally I MUCH prefer Logic).
The Apollo Solo is a great interface and comes with Console which is THE BEST monitor mixing app on the market but the interface is fundamentally flawed (IMO) by only having 1 DSP core meaning you can use many USD plugins to record through or monitor with.
What’s your budget? And primary need (vocals/acoustic/DI’d guitars etc)
I have id14 mkii, look good but it has problem with volume restart, volume knob is encoder. Support doesn't help with it. On redit people write about it also.
It’s an encoder to facilitate all the other functions the volume knob is used for (all outputs volumes, and assignable iD button scroll wheel function etc)
@@EdThorne Exactly but every-time you restart computer the volume is restarted to 0, after all restart you have to volume up. Any other interface keeps it. I sent to official service but they claims that it is desired behavior, nice. Their online help also doesn't respond with solution.
I just want to know this,...Can this iD14mkii allow me to utilize an EQ for my mic? I want this strictly for my Voice Over work and nothing else and all I want is to be able to EQ the mic through the interface to get the sound I want BEFORE I start recording. Basically I'm asking is there at least one simple plugin that comes with this device that allows for voice EQ?
No. This interface does not have the required DSP to process the audio before it hits the converters. For this you will need an Apollo Twin or Neumann MT48 interface (these are the ones I recommend).
Hi Ed what about under, say, 6-700 dollars. What’s the best choice.
If you can find an Apollo Twin (duo), I always recommend that for all the reasons in this video: ua-cam.com/video/x8GnDUG_yUc/v-deo.html
@@EdThorne Sure thanks.
10:23 What is a door input?
DAW input.
Do this work well on windows 10 ?
I’m a Mac guy, I can comment about PC.
Can i connect 2 Instruments (like guitar) at the same time on ID 14???
Yes.
@@EdThorne thank you very much!
Brit origin, Chinese assembly...nice
Do this better recording then the scarlett
Yes this do
Why in hell did Audient integrate 2 mic inputs and only 1 guitar??? And not vice versa? In my case I often record 1 guitar and need two inputs --> One for DI and 1 main input.
Will it work with windows
yes
between id14 and ssl 2+, which one sounds better?
Watch this space. Video coming soon on this!
Okay. I will be aware, since I am about to buy a new sound card and this is the main question, whether to choose between one or the other
@@joeldelarosa7451 What’s your budget? I always recommend the Apollo Twins if you can stretch the budget. If not, iD14 mkii mostly.
@@EdThorne I would like the apollo but I currently have no budget for it. If between SSL 2+ and id14 you recommend ud14, I'll go for it. Thanks for your recommendation 🙌
It's good for beyerdynamic 250 ohms .
Is that a statement or a question?
@@EdThorne I'm sorry , questions ?
Do you Think this one is better than clarett+
No, but the monitoring app is.
@@EdThorne thank you so much i like your channel so much
@@elikamin5678 Thank you 😊🙏
what is your pick for audio interface regardless of price range?
Good question. And this answer can be found in this video 😜 ua-cam.com/video/0H8RGfYdXnA/v-deo.html
Audient mk2 with Beyerdynamic DT 990 Pro okay?
How many ohms are they? My HD600s are 300ohms and were fine, but I was using ALL the output volume.
@@EdThorne Beyerdynamic DT 990 Pro only 250ohm. And I am wondering between Audient mk2 and Audient mk1. Please give me advice
@@letanhai445 You'll be fine then if they're 250Ohms. This video explains how the mkii is better (mostly improved converters). It's a very good interface!
@@EdThorne thanks a lot!
I'm no expert by any means, but it seems like he is downplaying the weaknesses and up-playing the strengths, i.e., it distorts, but it doesn't matter, and the headphones required almost full power, yet somehow doesn't distort? IDK.
The outputs on all interfaces distort at a deafening level - ie, it doesn’t matter because you won’t be mixing anywhere near that level. And The headphone amp requires almost full power with high impedance headphones which need more power to drive them, as most do. With low impedance headphones, again, the output can distort but at a level way higher than you would practically need. This is common on all interfaces.
I only care about what the converters sound like as I use only hardware synths and drum machines...The Motu M4 sucks in the converter department...
Most of these budget friendly devices have decent converters considering the price, but if you want to up the game from this/the M2, go for the Focusrite Clarett, Antelope ZenGo, or UA Apollo interfaces.
@@EdThorne
Thanx! I'm looking at a Apollo solo, right now.
For the life of me, I can't get this to work on my MacBook Pro M1. I am returning it
Anything I can help with? They’re class compliant so should show up in your DAW by just plugging it in. Then make sure you have your channel routing in the iD software and DAW correct.
Umm.... Have you reviewed the Motu M4 yet? The audient is excellent, but the Motu M4 gets my vote
I can’t get hold of one. I have spoken to the distributors and they’re out of stock. I could potentially buy one from a shop (if they have residual stock) and return it once I’ve done the review. I know Motu is good. I used to own an 828mkii. For me the ADAT expandability would be important. ADAT over MIDI but a lot of people are saying the opposite 🙂
@@EdThorne yeah. If you need the ADAT expandability, the Audient iD14 is definitely the star in this general price range. It's a great interface, no doubt!
@@EdThorne enjoying your channel
Eh, been there, done that; got the M4 when it came out of the Covid shadow a few months ago. I love doing vocals with stereo track backing. So I thought, well, I can connect my cell phone or tablet out via a split 1/4" cable to the Line inputs of the M4. NO GO. Those Line Level inputs can only take inputs from Line Level outs like from mixers. I thought, duh, I already have a mixer with USB (Mackie ProFX6V3); why the heck do I need the MOTU M4 then? So I regretfully returned it to Sweetwater. Fast forward a few months, and I just got the Audient EVO 8 from Sweetwater. To my delight, I can use two of the 4 Combo inputs to connect my cell phone! I just run the Auto Gain for those two lines. Oh, I can push the buttons on Lines 3 and 4 and make a stereo input! Hot dog! Then I plug in a microphone and I'm good to got. And even better, I can save all the settings on the EVO software mixer as a preset, so easy to bring up the next time I decide to record a vocal.
Just one thing: I have to turn the Mic Preamp volume all the way to the max to get a decent mic volume with the EVO 8. But what is SO STRANGE, is that on my DAW (Cakewalk), I add a Reverb Plug-In, then turn "Echo" on, and wow, I almost fell off my chair! The Mic sensitivity went up 300%, and I could even hear the creaking of my chair! Seriously I have to sit still so my chair won't creak while recording! Unreal; no idea why this happens but hey, no complaints, I'm delighted! Though, I must say, the Mic Pre-Amps on my ProFX6V3 are much more sensitive.
@@OnlineMD different needs I guess. I wouldn't want to connect my phone. I can either use the extra two inputs with my external preamps, or to feed back in after going out to analog gear from the extra two outs. Another notable feature of the M4 is that the digital to analog convertors are unusually high end for a interface in this range..... Great for bussing out for analog. The M4 is the perfect unit for me in this price range.i suppose I could use my phone with my outboard pres but I literally can't ever see myself doing that! Whatever works for your setup and workflow. I really like the sound of the M4. Doesn't sound entry level at all.