Can we trust the energy transition? | Zoe Hilton

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 24 гру 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ •

  • @jamesmaddox7507
    @jamesmaddox7507 Місяць тому +19

    Thank you for representing us and getting a senate hearing on these issues. These organisations have become corrupted and self serving. I don't understand why transurban has a monopoly on installing our transmission lines. Surely there should be at least three companies competing for these projects?

    • @neilsmithcreditmanager
      @neilsmithcreditmanager Місяць тому +2

      Transurban builds and operates Toll Roads
      Transgrid build and operate power infrastructure

  • @PINEx2
    @PINEx2 29 днів тому +2

    just found this channel and catching up on videos . awesome work, you deserve way more views and more people need to see this stuff.

  • @jibberjabber6919
    @jibberjabber6919 Місяць тому +15

    South Australia is the worst. Energy rates here are excessively high. Why are people not complaining about this?

    • @mariodelorenzo9092
      @mariodelorenzo9092 Місяць тому +2

      Because we're saving the planet

    • @Kawasaki1-m4l
      @Kawasaki1-m4l Місяць тому +2

      Agreed.
      We get paid bugger all feeding the grid.

    • @GazGuitarz
      @GazGuitarz Місяць тому +2

      My energy bill tripled compared to the same billing cycle time last year... and I've been even more energy conscious than ever. If it wasn't for the State government (election bribe) handing over $1000 to energy retailers for each household in Queensland, most of the State would be dark by now. Trans urban the Toll thieves and now Trans Grid the energy scammers ... bound to be a success in sucking the last blood from our veins for sure.

  • @sfincher123
    @sfincher123 Місяць тому +2

    Thanks for the investigation and video. Great work

  • @RecklessRenewables
    @RecklessRenewables Місяць тому +1

    Thanks

  • @Canucklug
    @Canucklug Місяць тому +5

    I find it quite interesting that including nuclear as an option and valuing long term infrastructure properly out to a 60 year life would make nuclear a compelling option on the Australia grid, but also improve the case for transmission projects
    Assessing things on investor timeframes isn't a good long term choice

    • @factnotfiction5915
      @factnotfiction5915 Місяць тому +3

      > nuclear ... also improve the case for transmission projects
      I believe the problem with your statement, from the current government's perspective, is that it doesn't improve the case for transmission projects to the places where wind/solar are harvested.
      Nuclear would only improve the case for transmission along the existing corridors :) as that is where the NPPs would be built anyway.

    • @buildmotosykletist1987
      @buildmotosykletist1987 Місяць тому +1

      @@factnotfiction5915 : Existing corridors service all of Australia's needs.

  • @peted3637
    @peted3637 Місяць тому +5

    Note to self: Rebuild my Lister CS diesel; it'll be needed for power backup duties in the coming years.

  • @kymcampbell2734
    @kymcampbell2734 Місяць тому +3

    The final cost of Bowen's renewable's system will massively exceed any figures getting tossed around at the minute.
    Where are the costing's for the 8 or so Base load Gas fired Generator's that are critical to the reliability of the entire system.

  • @waitawhileexplorer3904
    @waitawhileexplorer3904 Місяць тому +2

    One of the main drivers for inflation in this country.

  • @paull5297
    @paull5297 Місяць тому +2

    Great analysis

  • @sjdtmv
    @sjdtmv Місяць тому +3

    And that my dear is now another reason why for 14 years with grid connect solar I finally cut the grid off at home and went totally offgrid

    • @peted3637
      @peted3637 Місяць тому +1

      Good call, but the shame of it all is that the cost shenanigans affect the price of everything else that we buy.

  • @David-d4k9k
    @David-d4k9k Місяць тому +2

    The wholesale destruction of our land and sea environment for the sake of these expensive renewables is disgusting.

  • @angelahawke6956
    @angelahawke6956 Місяць тому +2

    Thank you for such a cut through video exposing how Transgrid has worked the taxpayer over and been allowed to.

    • @lindam.1502
      @lindam.1502 Місяць тому +1

      We have all seen the effect of post pandemic cost increases on the construction industry. It was completely understandable that they sought a higher cost price agreement. They need to deliver this project.

  • @gardengnome3249
    @gardengnome3249 Місяць тому +8

    This has been going on for decades. Have you just found out?

  • @gone547
    @gone547 Місяць тому +2

    $275.00

  • @chrisgriffiths2533
    @chrisgriffiths2533 29 днів тому

    Sadly Australia Still Does Not have the Ability to Build and Install Long Underground/Undersea Cables.
    Some of Our Grid Changes Should be Underground, Horizontal Drilling Grids.

  • @twcintrepid
    @twcintrepid Місяць тому +1

    The cost of Energy is set by the most expensive Energy not the cheapest. Pumped hydro and batteries, buy cheap energy and sell expensive energy. There is no Energy Transition it just building a renewables system and a backup system and then after they both fail a gas based system. We now have 300% the energy capacity just to make renewables "work".

    • @lindam.1502
      @lindam.1502 Місяць тому +2

      And we all breathe cleaner air due to renewables and the electrification of homes and transport.

  • @edwardbarnett6571
    @edwardbarnett6571 Місяць тому

    Because the Parrahub tunnel goes directly below Snowy 2 the HVDC cables can go in there to power the Japanese SC maglev between Sydney and Melbourne.

    • @shauno1970
      @shauno1970 Місяць тому

      Won't happen we are broke

  • @john4flying
    @john4flying Місяць тому +5

    Transgrid should be nationalised based on this conduct.

    • @rickjohnson2165
      @rickjohnson2165 Місяць тому

      Government owned companies are worse than private companies

  • @simondowdeswell6704
    @simondowdeswell6704 Місяць тому +1

    So is the privatisation of energy a good idea? Is it possible to create a "free market" in energy? Does the energy need of our population get served when competition is so obviously hard to create (with massive barriers to entry) and ultimately the government trys to step in - an act that ultimately fails due to the dodgy relationship between government and corporates resulting in constant subsidies to corporates, payed back to both our elected pollies and unelected (staffers etc) as cushy jobs?

  • @LaramieSmooth
    @LaramieSmooth Місяць тому +3

    Can't work out who takes top spot for the most misleading name, liberal, labor, the greens or the centre for 'independent' studies 😄

  • @stephenbrickwood1602
    @stephenbrickwood1602 Місяць тому

    Nuclear electricity is grid electricity and grid electricity to replace fossil fuels is insane BIG grid capacity construction costs.

  • @Birch37
    @Birch37 8 днів тому +1

    Corruption

  • @jules9094
    @jules9094 Місяць тому +4

    I love when I watch things like this that are so confidently incorrect. How about looking at how the energy market operates and come back to this video. Easy to hate on transgrid given their most recent issue at broken hill

  • @jamesnelson7887
    @jamesnelson7887 3 дні тому

    Renewables are the best way to milk the taxpayer.

  • @David-x6f
    @David-x6f Місяць тому +1

    Why buy off a sprawling company's grid when I can supply it myself. F#*k the big energy companies and the stupid regulator. Independence from giant companies' energy grids is the way of the future.

  • @richardplane2155
    @richardplane2155 Місяць тому +1

    No.

  • @MrPsychochickens
    @MrPsychochickens Місяць тому

    Why do we allow atlas network dribble in the public domain.

    • @damiendeecee
      @damiendeecee Місяць тому +3

      🤣 Because they understand economics, unlike yourself. Haha

  • @douglasengle2704
    @douglasengle2704 Місяць тому +5

    It's not the percentage of wild AC the public power grid is having to support from wind turbine and solar voltaic generated electricity that is substantially important, but its fuel savings, which is little to non. In the US the advertised fuel savings for supporting the wild AC from wind turbine and solar voltaic generated electricity supported by the electric utility grid is 1% each. That number is likely rounded up significantly.
    The practical use for wind turbine and solar voltaic generated electricity is for maintaining electrical energy storage such as charging storage batteries or working with something similar such as hydropower.
    It can use less natural gas to run natural gas turbine generators at high efficiency 85% output where they can make full use of a steam cycle adding 50% higher efficiency, which is a natural gas combined cycle plant, making all the electricity than to 100% instantly back up a wind generator farm for the same electrical output to behave as a scheduled power station.
    Instant 100% backup requires natural gas turbine generators running at high availability consuming 70% of the fuel of full output, but making little electricity. In fast response peaking applications the second steam cycle made from the hot exhaust can not be used that adds another 50% efficiency.
    The cheapest incremental electricity is from hydropower and nuclear power. Second to those in the US would be a new ultra supercritical clean coal plant burning high BTU bituminous coal at about 1/3 the fueling cost of cheap US natural gas at an offseason wholesale price in early summer 2024 of $2.50 per million BTUs. Winter peak natural gas wholesale prices can be several times higher.

  • @morganoox3838
    @morganoox3838 Місяць тому +8

    Nuclear is the safest form of power. Safer than wind and solar.

    • @nickreid5297
      @nickreid5297 Місяць тому

      Except, of course, when it isn't. And if you don't like the dodgy accounting exposed here, just wait for the dodgy accounting that will be necessary to make nuclear look viable.

  • @lindam.1502
    @lindam.1502 Місяць тому +2

    All of this to complain about $21pa extra onto electricity bills. Seems to me the regulator is doing a great job.

  • @AlanDownunder
    @AlanDownunder Місяць тому +1

    Can we trust the CIS?

    • @isaachauser521
      @isaachauser521 Місяць тому +5

      You don’t need to trust them, everything they’ve said is based on publicly available information, which means you or anyone else can check their claims.

    • @lindam.1502
      @lindam.1502 Місяць тому +1

      ''Although there are no explicit ties between the CIS and the centre-right Liberal Party, the CIS is politically aligned with the Liberal Party, praising Liberal Party founder Robert Menzies, hosting various Liberal Party politicians and holding very critical views of the Labor Party.'' Wikipedia.

  • @peterjohn5834
    @peterjohn5834 12 днів тому +1

    Who is the Centre for Independent Studies? Who funds this Centre for Independent Studies? Why is this supposed Independent Think Tank so negative on obvious required infrastructure? What disappointing rubbish.

    • @Birch37
      @Birch37 8 днів тому

      It must be disappointing to learn that the Labor Government is corrupt?? 😅😂😅

    • @barefoot.cryptographer3974
      @barefoot.cryptographer3974 7 днів тому

      Well, Zoe Hilton has a Bachelors of science with first class honours. What qualifications do you have Peter John?

  • @kymcampbell2734
    @kymcampbell2734 Місяць тому +1

    The Subsidizing of all the solar farms would probably have something to do with it ay.

  • @scottfoster9452
    @scottfoster9452 Місяць тому +1

    Gross bullshit is net Zero!

  • @acotrel1
    @acotrel1 12 днів тому +1

    The Centre for Independent Studies is a right-wing think tank - not very independent ? Donald Trump rides again !

    • @Birch37
      @Birch37 8 днів тому

      🤡 😅 🤡