why is he the bad guy in this situation? thats super shitty and very illegal! A guy skipping out on a conversation does not equate to revenge porn, nothing does!
Is this how you define political?: "relating to the government or the public affairs of a country." because in that case, it doesn't necessarily have to be.
What she did was borderline psychotic. If a guy had done what she had done, everyone would loose their shit. You don't get to do that to someone because they lost interest in you.
Chase was a jerk to make it seem like he's into her and then ditch her the instant some hot gal was offering a hook up. Nevertheless, her response to that was likely a crime and really marks her horrible character!
@@cybercriminal3110 You think showing kindness to a woman is OWING them? You a major psychopath if you think flirting with a girl trying hard to make a connection in the hopes of ONLY banging her while she was making a connection for the real thing isn't wrong. Karma comes for all
This was not okay. 10 years ago or even now. The fact that she dismissed it and even blamed the victim makes it more bad. I would have sue the shit out of her.
Yeah sorry, no lawyer would ever let you do anything here. Also threatening with legal action over something as insignificant as this is quite... pathetic :) says alot about your character.
ThePatrickis She dodged a bullet. She could easily have ruined Chase's career with this "prank". Why do you think he was so desperate to track her down? If his bosses had found out about this Chase would have been in serious trouble, and then he could have sued her into the poorhouse for it. She's damn lucky that he found her before that happened. The social media site would be in big trouble as well. They should have taken all the photos down the instant he contacted them to complain.
Why does he keep saying she was “pranking” him, that’s not what this was. This was revenge porn, plain and simple. And that’s not okay, male or female, have nude photos (even photoshopped ones) posted without your consent. Not. Okay.
@@matthewmills2944 Actually according to the law it's still revenge porn, a felony in most states. When you attach someone's PII (Personally Identifiable Information .. name, face, SSN) to a nude photograph fake or real, you are attacking them.
I like how he keeps calling it a “prank” and saying “why would you prank me like this” “it was you who pranked me”....I would not consider revenge porn a prank under any circumstances.
that's male privilege for you. he doesn't have to worry about this following him around for the rest of his life, costing him his career, his friends, his family, just "harhar angry lady photoshopped a tiny pp on me, such prank!"
@@dietotaku Herrejösses, please never be in a relationship with any man for your entire life...actually on second thought, if you do manage to find an idiot thats not turned off by your incredibly unattractive personality, i hope they are atleast smart enough to know when to take your inevitable toxicity and abuse to court.
Exactly. Her trying to play it off as self confident was so off. Sometimes I think there are two sets of writers, one for house and one for everybody else.
@@m-linko This was not "just a prank". It was a straight up crime and she should've been arrested for it (and probably would have had he chosen to actually press charges).
...He slept with a minor, which in this twisted court system, would jail him despite his being deceived and despite a third (adult) party being involved.
@@elldibs7396 This isn't about "man slut" and "female aggression". This is about legal boundaries. It's highly illegal, man or woman, to broadcast someone's naked body without their consent. And the fact that you are trying to trivialize it by saying it's just "manslut reaction to female aggression" is very disturbing. You should probably be investigated...
Dude just left...didnt insult her, didnt lead her on or be a jerk. Just left. And she reacted that way? Thats not a “prank”, that’s very messed up behavior and she should be held accountable
A prime example of sexism working both ways. What this woman did was both highly illegal and morally wrong on multiple levels, yet somehow the writers thought that her being a girl and Chase being a guy somehow made it okay?
Nope, they thought her being a _hot_ girl made it alright. Keep your eyes open for that in a tv-show: some woman does something like slapping somebody who was rude to her, or 'pranking' somebody. If it's a hot woman, it'll be played for laughs. If it's a woman to old / chubby to be hot, it's evil. Or crazy. And keep in mind: this is fiction. It doesn't in any way, shape or form mean that it would work out the same way in reality. I think you can see that in movies a lot: hundreds of little examples of a pretty woman getting something just for flirting and smiling a bit. I know I've heard the complaint/claim "well women get anything just for being pretty" in real life, but how often have you seen this 'beautiful woman getting away with a crime just for being beautiful' sexism in real life?
Frances Evans No... But either way I don't know if changing your profile-picture would qualify. And if his password was "password" it's hardly hacking either.
Baard Ove Kopperud It would still be a breach of terms and conditions, accessing a computer or account that doesn't belong to you is illegal (at least in U.K.) and he could sue her for defamation of character.
@@KayderimGameplays only because men over all get away with HORRIBLE behavior across the globe, worldwide and historically. Doesn’t make it ok BUT it’s terrible on both sides.
Fuckologic house the gun back because above all he wants to solve the midterm of his medical state. So if he didn’t give him his gun back police would took him away and he would never get to solve this. It just showed how far House is willing to go to fulfill his needs because he didn’t actually care about the patient
@@GoldenKirby IF I am NOT mistaken (which I could be...did not watch this epi more than once as it was not one of the good ones), Chase had some personal pics of that nature, all this gal did was change the "appearance" of the private part of them.
@@victorpradha9946 Lol, no, Chase doesn't have nude pictures of himself just lying around hither and thither; he doesn't love himself that much. *She* took the picture in the bathroom at the hotel (which Taub figures out in from the logo on the towels), and photoshopped it.
I worked with TI, most of people are lazy, even the intelligent ones. i had a coworker who liked to steal msn accounts in the 90's and doing "hacking stuff" , but as far as i know was not as revenge or to gain anything from it.
lies. Look at the statistics. Haven't you heard of the Brooke turner who only got two years for rape. The justice system is so much harsher for women. The average prison sentence of men who kill their women partners is 2 to 6 years, women who kill their male partners are sentence on average to 15 years. This is despite the fact that 86% of female offenders kill in self defence, while males are most likely to kill out of possessiveness (82%), abuse (75%) and during augments (63%).
It's interesting to see though...because when it happens to a guy you can more objectively see why it happened. She liked every girl that said hi or talked to her. Without getting pc about this guy needs to go to jail. What made her do it and why did it happen?
So do you sleep with potential minors too? You could avoid that dread by sleeping with someone closer to your age category AND asking them their age if you have doubts...
@@yevgeniyaleshchenko849 Who is a "potential minor"? And what exactly is an "age category"? Remember, Chase slept with a consenting adult here. So what's your problem?
So the guy was upfront with her about what he wanted. She didn’t want the same thing. They went there separate ways and he hooked up with other girls and somehow she has the right to feel hard done by?
@@tjjordan4207 Correction, not ''women like that'' but PEOPLE LIKE THAT. You know that men can and do lash out and take revenge for being ''rejected''? Why are you not ranting about those men who act like petulant children when they hear ''no'' or when you don't laugh at their jokees or disagree with them, do yo know how many of those ''men'' a woman seens in her lifetime? Grow up.
6:22 I love how she thought she could walk away here. If I were Chase, I'd be wearing a wire to record all this and her confession would get her jail time.
@hahagotcha!!!! your body isn't public property, it's YOUR body, no one has the right to reveal any nude photos of you without consent unless they're somehow evidence in a criminal case. Having people change their behaviour because of what shitty people are doing is a terrible way to think. Forcing people to change through fear is called terrorism, they're spreading the fear that if you want to send a promiscuous picture to someone you love or your just sharing an attraction with. That's perfectly fine, you should absolutely should be allowed to do that without wondering how many other people are going to see that. Just because you get sent a private picture doesn't mean you own that image and can do with it as you please. Stop blaming the people who take the pictures then send them to the intended recipient, and start telling the people sharing hem around with whoever the hell they want when it's not their body to get their shit together.
@@devonchafe2764 That's not terrorism. Terrorism is violence inflicted against the populace. "Having people change their behaviour because of what shitty people are doing is a terrible way to think." - You're probably thinking of "blackmail" instead.
@@devonchafe2764 That's not terrorism. Terrorism is violence inflicted against the populace. "Having people change their behaviour because of what shitty people are doing is a terrible way to think." - You're probably thinking of "blackmail" instead.
She's just confesses to criminal invasion of privacy, unauthorized access to confidential data and intentional infliction of emotional distress. That's about five years in the pokey right there!
Thats not true. there are basically no cases of people being charged for revenge porn (because its new) and it happens SO MUCH more to women then too men.
men don't get in trouble for anything. Look at the statistics. Haven't you heard of the Brooke turner who only got two years for rape. The justice system is so much harsher for women. The average prison sentence of men who kill their women partners is 2 to 6 years, women who kill their male partners are sentence on average to 15 years. This is despite the fact that 86% of female offenders kill in self defence, while males are most likely to kill out of possessiveness (82%), abuse (75%) and during augments (63%).
As a woman (and a feminist), this subplot made me uncomfortable. This has happened to quite a few of my friends and acquaintances and it almost ruined them. Just because Chase is a guy, that doesn’t make this comedic. What this girl did was WRONG. I don’t know why it’s taken so lightly in the show.
@@turningmememachine7256 people who say "male nudity can be used for comedic purposes cause men are less shameful about their nudity" >>>>> people who say "OJ killing his wife is okay"
6:11 Yeah, she is a psycho "You deserve this because we talked for 5 minutes, i didn't want to sleep with you, and you leave me alone instead of being a creep" imagine if the roles were inverted, that would've been HILARIOUS right??????
Wow! that woman is a genius. She manipulated the victim of her cyber crime to not only apologize but also make amends for any perceived aggrievance on his part. Bravo!
Women 101, when losing a discussion change the subject and make the man look guilty, if is not enough, humiliate him. It is not much if comes with the cromossomes.
I was expecting these comments to be full of cancer, but honestly, UA-cam you have slightly redeemed my faith in humanity. This was not okay in any way and is a total double standard. Nobody owes you anything indeed.
@@gales9969 No, they are full of fair-minded, level-headed, not-completely-batshit-insane men AND women who can recognize a double-standard when they see one and are calling the writers out for it. And this isn't even about men vs. women; as Billy Hatzi pointed out above, this is about "a person trying to enforce a conception of morality on someone else's sexuality, and if that doesn't seem as sinister as it should in this context...the same characterization applies to the bully who spray paints "FAGGOT" on a homosexuals car." I would think someone who supports gay rights could see and appreciate that point.
thats because people stand up for men more then women, weather the people commenting "if the roles were reversed" want to admit it or not if the roles were reversed there would be thousands of people commenting sexist stupid stuff, more then on this video. thats the world we live in.
@@freyjamulhall3615, do you always make statements without evidence? "People stand up for men more [than] women" lol... please, I can only take in so much stupidity.
This one didn't age at the time. It was always a WTF? from the writing staff, and took a lot of flack even at the time. Simply awful writing. Then and now.
I am very much opposed to the way Chase's situation is played off as a joke. He didn't do anything wrong, just wasn't interested in her. She even gets rewarded for it and is played as the good guy by the end of the whole situation when Chase asks her out???However, I'm very interested in the difference in reactions between this episode and the comments and the episode where the intersex model is aggressively misgendered. Just interesting what people think is acceptable vs. not-acceptable as time moves forward.
I think the intent of this episode was to show Chase's sex life at the time was unhealthy because he jumped the gun and avoided asking seemingly redundant questions. "Is she under 18?" "Is she single?" "Will anything bad occur from me sleeping with someone I just met at a wedding?" Which wouldn't be too bad of a topic to tackle since it wouldn't necessarily "constant sex is bad m'kay?" but instead like most episodes of House raise a philosophical question, in this case being when too much is too careless...but BOY OH BOY DID THEY SCREW THE POOCH ON THIS ONE! Chase is in the end called out for admittedly blowing someone off harshly yet apparently that means escalating a situation by shaming him on the internet for his decision to not interact with her (actively avoiding a situation where she would feel uncomfortable because they both wanted different things) by plastering him as not a person but an OBJECT to be oggled at and/or ridiculed by is OKAY??? This is as bad as making fun of someone for being a sex worker because "lawl slut". Chase is demeaned for a mistake he made and she has no self-awareness of her own flaws, simply stating "i'd never do that"? He who is without sin can cast the first stone lady. What's that? You think anyone would be in the right when it came to something they were entitled to? Good, I know a group of people that everyone loves that feels the same way you should meet.
Women will lie about all those questions, and maybe lie on court later, so any men is open to trouble while interacting with women. Mike Pence rule exists for a reason.
That actually isn't negative reinformcent; it's positive punishment. + reinforcement= addition of something you like as reward - reinformcent= removal of something you don't like as reward + punishment= adding something you don't like as punishment - punishment= taking away something you like as punishment.
Positive and negative is something pleasant or unpleasant happening to you. so obviously this is negative reinforcement. No different to if he was hit with a stick every time he performed some action. That's what people mean when they say you can teach using either "the carrot or the stick", IE> The carrot is the positive reinforcement, the stick is negative reinforcement. Calling it reinforcement vs punishment is a matter of perspective. If you're trying to teach/train someone someone in certain behaviour then what you're trying to do is "reinforce" a behaviour and you can use positive or negative ways to do it. When you are being given the stick it can be perceived as a punishment. You can also see that someone isn't trying to punish or reward you, but you can see that your own behaviour is still being positively or negative reinforced. It doesn't need to be a conscious attempt to change behaviour. For example it can also result from revenge, so say you do something I don't like and I beat you up because I just want to hurt you. In any case your future behaviour will now be affected because something negative resulted from your behaviour. This is why abusive people can train people to become neurotic and self-hating by punishing good/healthy normal behaviour. This is negative reinforcement. Calling it punishment is entirely dependant on the point of view of the subject you're thinking about it from. For that reason it can be seen as punishment and not punishment at the same exact time. This is also why you can also positively reinforce behaviour unintentionally, but unintended behavioural outcomes are still going to result in positive and negative reinforcing of behaviour. This is why you can see "life" as punishing you, when you get negative outcomes to your behaviour. Life doesn't need to be giving you a lesson, but you can see it as a punishment all the same and regardless is still contributing to reinforcing behaviour. In other words, what you're saying here is wrong as well as pedantic and they did not use this term inaccurately. It was both negative reinforcement as well as her "punishment". They are not contradictory.
@@TheSkepticalIdealist This is so wrong. They're literally definitions in a biology textbook and every med student will learn this. Original commentor is correct. Just because the general public use it incorrectly doesn't mean they don't have a very specific definition in an esoteric environment. You wrote all this but you could've saved yourself the humiliation if you've just consulted a textbook, or a quick google search for "BF Skinner's Chart" ...
Have you heard of this concept called "time", these things called "dates" when laws are enacted and the fact that this show aired in 2011? Or were you not aware of any of these concepts?
I saw this episode when it premiered. I didnt find it cute then and I dont find it cute now, for a number of reasons. 1. I dont like those scenes where female characters publicly humiliate men over petty offenses, mainly because of the fact that in real life most of these stunts could lead to the guy getting arrested and put on the offender list. 2. They expected us to think Chase deserved all of this because he was pursuing women for sex while being young, and single. I call bull. This woman took a photo of him without his knowing, posted it online to various sites, stole money from his accounts and humiliated him in front of his coworkers IN A HOSPITAL. Im not a white collar dude, but I know that being a doctor, generally speaking because I know he got promoted in the end, is one of those jobs where a scandal could break someones career. Theres no telling what kind of individuals might start showing up at his house or his job, or how much his finances were impacted. Yet all she could say was "actions have consequences" and "you needed negative reinforcement" over leaving her mid date. Chase had every right to record her confession and sue her afterwards. 3. Im all about gender equality in media, so it always annoys me when a show triess to make any male character that dare have a sex life outiide of marriage into a bad guy.
The lady who did this is absolutely terrible. I really don’t understand the perspective of the writers in this. Being a player doesn’t excuse humiliating sexual harassment, and then the writers make him “learn his lesson.” WHAT LESSON? DONT TALK TO WOMEN?
"Actions have consequences" girl you had ONE conversation with him and he decided not to pursue it and you decided to stalk him and publicly shame him. Thats like if he turned around and started posting pictures of you online because you WOULDNT sleep with him.
I don't like how what she did has been played off as perfectly acceptable and justifiable as a retaliation of what he did which, yes was shitty, but nothing compared to posting revenge porn of someone online. Edited or not.
Wth! I forgot all about this, but did he just asked her out after everything she has done to him! So a guy has different interests than yours and because you spent few minutes talking and he was honest to flee, you seek revenge!? 😮🙄 wth!
I love how you say about the time Chase spent with her. It was only one date,who gets that pissed about such a dumb slight? I'd understand if she found him and threw some juice, milkshake,or whatever cold drink.
That was disgusting from her. If you disagree, imagine a guy releasing a woman's nudes because she didn't find him interesting enough to sleep with him after a single meeting. In his shoes, I'd have pressed charges.
That woman was definitely a psychopath or a sociopath at the very least. Yuck. Who does that? Just imagine if every single woman who get politely rejected reacted this way, the guy did nothing wrong, he just lost interest, whatever the reason may be. 100% psychotic and a literal crime.
All he did was excuse himself from the situation and she retaliated by committing a crime and humiliating him. Then he proceeds to not press chargers as if she didn’t deserve it for costing him his job.
Reading these comments restored a bit of my faith in humanity... I was pleasantly surprised reading the comments from women who called out that "Degenerate Piece of Shite" and what she did to Chase was disturbing and disgusting.
There's a difference between 1. Saying you want something 2. Thinking you want it 3. *Actually* wanting it 4. Acting on it 5. Acting *against* it Feminists are doing #1 and #5. They will talk about "toxic masculinity", but then continue to demonize and ridicule men as "pathetic" and "unmanly" if they dare stand up for their rights. They will get (rightfully) outraged if someone wants to stop abortions, but then get equally outraged if they are no longer allowed to force the legal responsibility of that child on a man who never wanted it. And they will explain almost any area where men are doing better as "oppression of women", but never call it "oppression of men" when the opposite happen - like in family courts, the female dominated educational system, life expectancy, suicide rates, sentencing in general etc.
This episode was not it, him being “into” her after she told him “well you are a jerk who sleeps with multiple women…. Soooo” and Chase was like: *smirks* wow you’re so confident and smart, I totally want to go out with you. This was super ridiculous, I hated that episode and how it made it “ok” for Chase’s privacy to be infringed.
why is he the bad guy in this situation? thats super shitty and very illegal! A guy skipping out on a conversation does not equate to revenge porn, nothing does!
Olivia Francis he’s a man
That’s why.
Why do you have to make a house clip political?
@@DimitriosDenton because this was sent into the media as something completely ok
Saying "nothing does" is incorrect, but the rest of your comment is accurate.
Is this how you define political?: "relating to the government or the public affairs of a country." because in that case, it doesn't necessarily have to be.
She probably wouldn't be laughing once she found herself in a courtroom
Not when the judge decides to prosecute her as an adult black man.
Or behind bars.
Or if she was the one looking for the person who leaked her nudes (even if they are photoshopped).
@@jouaql1028 exactly.
equality
“My password was password”
My whole family in a nutshell
Annnnnnnnd hacked
Why are the "Hot" guys always dumb?
and this is why I make Complicated Passwords for all my Stuff!
@@malikguzman9132 cause they’re usually gay.
@@Hassony523 I don't think sexuality has anything to do with intelligence.
What she did was borderline psychotic. If a guy had done what she had done, everyone would loose their shit. You don't get to do that to someone because they lost interest in you.
"borderline"
nah
Trueeeee....u need to respect the other person
Chase was a jerk to make it seem like he's into her and then ditch her the instant some hot gal was offering a hook up. Nevertheless, her response to that was likely a crime and really marks her horrible character!
@@asimhussain8716 Dude proceeding to bang someone within hours means "pure" is off the table for all involved.
Absolutely, Marcus! Take care of what happens in your bed, don't control others! I think, he could have meet her in court for such a thing.
And he didn't just not sue her, he apologised to her... Wtf Chase, you deserve better.
Because he knew he deserved it
@@KatalinaKristina He doesn't owe anything to her and definitely didn't deserve to have his nudes leaked and his money stolen
@@cybercriminal3110 You think showing kindness to a woman is OWING them? You a major psychopath if you think flirting with a girl trying hard to make a connection in the hopes of ONLY banging her while she was making a connection for the real thing isn't wrong. Karma comes for all
Bad writting.
Yeah, now a days the writing would have to be tweaked a bit. Boy how times change!
This was not okay. 10 years ago or even now. The fact that she dismissed it and even blamed the victim makes it more bad. I would have sue the shit out of her.
*sued. Really need to step up my grammar. sigh
Yeah sorry, no lawyer would ever let you do anything here. Also threatening with legal action over something as insignificant as this is quite... pathetic :) says alot about your character.
ThePatrickis she hacked into his bank account, that is something serious.
She most definitely did not? It's his facebook account, definitely not as serious as bank account.
ThePatrickis She dodged a bullet.
She could easily have ruined Chase's career with this "prank". Why do you think he was so desperate to track her down? If his bosses had found out about this Chase would have been in serious trouble, and then he could have sued her into the poorhouse for it. She's damn lucky that he found her before that happened.
The social media site would be in big trouble as well. They should have taken all the photos down the instant he contacted them to complain.
Why does he keep saying she was “pranking” him, that’s not what this was. This was revenge porn, plain and simple. And that’s not okay, male or female, have nude photos (even photoshopped ones) posted without your consent. Not. Okay.
Ehhhhhh photoshop is pretty alright. Not nice, you *shouldn't* do it, but it's not that bad. Revenge porn is pretty shitty tho
No one thinks it’s ok in this episode.
And it's illegal.
@@matthewmills2944 Actually according to the law it's still revenge porn, a felony in most states. When you attach someone's PII (Personally Identifiable Information .. name, face, SSN) to a nude photograph fake or real, you are attacking them.
But, but, but... it's okay for feminists to do whatever they want. All men deserve it.
I like how he keeps calling it a “prank” and saying “why would you prank me like this” “it was you who pranked me”....I would not consider revenge porn a prank under any circumstances.
ITS JUST A PRANK BRO
that's male privilege for you. he doesn't have to worry about this following him around for the rest of his life, costing him his career, his friends, his family, just "harhar angry lady photoshopped a tiny pp on me, such prank!"
@@dietotaku
Herrejösses, please never be in a relationship with any man for your entire life...actually on second thought, if you do manage to find an idiot thats not turned off by your incredibly unattractive personality, i hope they are atleast smart enough to know when to take your inevitable toxicity and abuse to court.
Isn't it illegal now?
@@lizanna6390 I think it was illegal when this show out
Imagine being so insecure that when a guy loses interest in you, you feel the need to publicly humiliate him
Say that louder for the people in the back
Exactly. Her trying to play it off as self confident was so off. Sometimes I think there are two sets of writers, one for house and one for everybody else.
background noise o
@@TimelessWorldOfGaming seems like a Chad move, dk what u on about
Don't hate the player, hate the game. She's having a ball and Chase is learning.
13 would've found that completely beyond messed up and would've definitely not let Chase let this "prank" slide
Oh, if this happened to 13 or 13 was somehow involved would have been FANTASTIC what her reactions would have been or what she would have done.
Real men don't whine. Literally just a prank. Gtfo
@@m-linko guess that means you ain't a real man by your definition?
@@m-linko This was not "just a prank". It was a straight up crime and she should've been arrested for it (and probably would have had he chosen to actually press charges).
@@m-linkosince when is credit card theft a crime
...she should be in jail right now.
If the genders were revered he'd be in a trial right now
Zones If they decided to press charges, yeah. If not, then no.
Yo Shinji Get In the Robot It still proves there is a double standard. You also have consider that this was 5-6 years ago.
...He slept with a minor, which in this twisted court system, would jail him despite his being deceived and despite a third (adult) party being involved.
Greggles She was 17 and it was in New Jersey. He wouldn't go to jail for shit. Worse case scenario he would get a fine for sexual misconduct.
This is horrifying. And then he asks her out in the end? WTF.
Quess he was after the sex and then would have dumped her for revenge.
that's just the average man slut reaction to any female aggression
@@elldibs7396 This isn't about "man slut" and "female aggression". This is about legal boundaries. It's highly illegal, man or woman, to broadcast someone's naked body without their consent. And the fact that you are trying to trivialize it by saying it's just "manslut reaction to female aggression" is very disturbing. You should probably be investigated...
@@Hero_of_Legend I'm not sure you'd want to pry too far into that ugly can of worms...
@@RenamedChannel Well, a rather vocal, psycho minority of that society, but yeah :P
Taub is truly House's guy. "I want you to know that your humiliation has eased my burden" lol
They're all House's guys (& girls)
As bad as this Episode was, that line was hilarious.
And him trying so hard not to laugh at 1:10
Dude just left...didnt insult her, didnt lead her on or be a jerk. Just left.
And she reacted that way?
Thats not a “prank”, that’s very messed up behavior and she should be held accountable
There's a big difference between "just leaving" vs "having an accountability to others". But she is insane, there's no denying it.
A modern-day woman in the making. Actually, they don't even deserve the title of woman or adult, they're just teenagers who never grew up.
@@tjjordan4207 That's not women, that's just assholes.
I'm so glad most of the commentators realize how awful this girl is and how much of a double standard this scene shows
A prime example of sexism working both ways. What this woman did was both highly illegal and morally wrong on multiple levels, yet somehow the writers thought that her being a girl and Chase being a guy somehow made it okay?
No, it actually shows how it works IRL xDDD
Exactly
Nope, they thought her being a _hot_ girl made it alright.
Keep your eyes open for that in a tv-show: some woman does something like slapping somebody who was rude to her, or 'pranking' somebody. If it's a hot woman, it'll be played for laughs. If it's a woman to old / chubby to be hot, it's evil. Or crazy.
And keep in mind: this is fiction. It doesn't in any way, shape or form mean that it would work out the same way in reality.
I think you can see that in movies a lot: hundreds of little examples of a pretty woman getting something just for flirting and smiling a bit. I know I've heard the complaint/claim "well women get anything just for being pretty" in real life, but how often have you seen this 'beautiful woman getting away with a crime just for being beautiful' sexism in real life?
@@Julia-lk8jn they also did this with Chase where they did a sort of show on "if you're handsome, anything goes" in that speed dating episode
what? the show doesnt tell you that it was okay
Revenge porn wasn't a criminal offense back then was it?
Frances Evans No... But either way I don't know if changing your profile-picture would qualify. And if his password was "password" it's hardly hacking either.
Fun fact, almost no sites allow password to be your password.
"password!" works
xskeithxdeathx do you know this personally?? jk lol
Baard Ove Kopperud
It would still be a breach of terms and conditions, accessing a computer or account that doesn't belong to you is illegal (at least in U.K.) and he could sue her for defamation of character.
Ah now I finally understand. Revenge is only okay if you're angry at the other person. Glad this episode cleared up that social issue.
No. Revenge is only okay if you are a woman.
cleared up what exactly? Did someting happen to the woman who posted the nudes?
@@rohanmanchanda5250 Art imitating life, women often get away with bad behaviour
No, it's okay if you are a woman.
@@KayderimGameplays only because men over all get away with HORRIBLE behavior across the globe, worldwide and historically. Doesn’t make it ok BUT it’s terrible on both sides.
Jesse Spencer has my sympathy for having to do this dreadful storyline.
The beginning is funny to me cause you can tell he was more than willing to whip it out right there to prove himself.
This is sexual harassment.
"...and I don't have to take it" XD. I hope you get the reference
Walter Carvalho raaaaaape!
why does it look like the ends trying to say "this is okay"
No
It wasn't happening to a women, so the feminists wouldn't care.
This has to be the dumbest plotline in the history of House.
Super boring
@kevin k because is Chase :v
but not the dumbest moment
the dumbest moment must be House giving the pistol back to the idiot-kidpapper during the hostage standoff in the MRI room
Fuckologic house the gun back because above all he wants to solve the midterm of his medical state. So if he didn’t give him his gun back police would took him away and he would never get to solve this. It just showed how far House is willing to go to fulfill his needs because he didn’t actually care about the patient
or the most nuanced. You just havent realized.
This wasn't a prank, it was a disproportionate humiliation for a minor slight. IRL this would have ended either in court, or in payback of some kind.
to be fair if this was IRL, Chase, House and the rest of them would have lost their medical licence and maybe would be in jail by this point
It happened to a man. IRL he would have been told to not let such a "juvenile prank" bother him.
@fairystail1 100% hahaha.
And everyone seems to gloss over the fact that Chase slept with a minor. ...Probably bc he's pretty 😛
@@Josh.WDW.17 is of legal age to consent. It's inappropriate but not illegal
Chase: I am a good,intelligent doctor
Also Chase: My password is password
Also...keeps private pics at the ready...what a doofus!
@@victorpradha9946 the private pic was photoshopped i think
@@GoldenKirby IF I am NOT mistaken (which I could be...did not watch this epi more than once as it was not one of the good ones), Chase had some personal pics of that nature, all this gal did was change the "appearance" of the private part of them.
@@victorpradha9946 Lol, no, Chase doesn't have nude pictures of himself just lying around hither and thither; he doesn't love himself that much. *She* took the picture in the bathroom at the hotel (which Taub figures out in from the logo on the towels), and photoshopped it.
I worked with TI, most of people are lazy, even the intelligent ones. i had a coworker who liked to steal msn accounts in the 90's and doing "hacking stuff" , but as far as i know was not as revenge or to gain anything from it.
She got off way too easy. That dinner date offer should have been replaced with a call to the police. Revenge porn is illegal for a reason.
Yikes terrible story line. She smiles at the end like this type of violation is cute????
Crazy bitches man, crazy bitches...
This is disgusting. If he was a woman this would’ve been taken so much more seriously...
lies. Look at the statistics. Haven't you heard of the Brooke turner who only got two years for rape. The justice system is so much harsher for women. The average prison sentence of men who kill their women partners is 2 to 6 years, women who kill their male partners are sentence on average to 15 years. This is despite the fact that 86% of female offenders kill in self defence, while males are most likely to kill out of possessiveness (82%), abuse (75%) and during augments (63%).
@@freyjamulhall3615 Obligatory "sources please."
@@freyjamulhall3615, citation needed...
A lesbian then?? That would be interesting...
It's interesting to see though...because when it happens to a guy you can more objectively see why it happened. She liked every girl that said hi or talked to her. Without getting pc about this guy needs to go to jail. What made her do it and why did it happen?
he, apologized to her ??????
episod written by a feminist !!!
HipHop Fate feminists at their prime
Wrong. Feminism isn't hating men. I'm a feminist and I think this lady's character should be in jail. What she did was wrong, regardless of gender
Christopher Marlowe stupidity level infinity
@@alioh7615 you must be one of those 1950s feminists
The dread when chase heard “graduation” I felt that in my bones
It is a nice touch about the father care about predators, but the daughter is already experienced in threesome with strangers.
So do you sleep with potential minors too? You could avoid that dread by sleeping with someone closer to your age category AND asking them their age if you have doubts...
@@yevgeniyaleshchenko849 Who is a "potential minor"? And what exactly is an "age category"? Remember, Chase slept with a consenting adult here. So what's your problem?
@lostalone9320 actually, she was not 18. She's turning 18. Though it was legal still that's not an adult
@@AntiSwewingCircleChristianity 17 is still off limits for 18 unless there was a relationship prior to one turning 18.
So the guy was upfront with her about what he wanted. She didn’t want the same thing. They went there separate ways and he hooked up with other girls and somehow she has the right to feel hard done by?
Women like that have no logic, it's their ultimate enemy because it means being accountable. Feelings is all they care about.
@@tjjordan4207 Correction, not ''women like that'' but PEOPLE LIKE THAT. You know that men can and do lash out and take revenge for being ''rejected''? Why are you not ranting about those men who act like petulant children when they hear ''no'' or when you don't laugh at their jokees or disagree with them, do yo know how many of those ''men'' a woman seens in her lifetime? Grow up.
Something tells me that this subplot wouldn't have been played for laughs if the genders were reversed.
Kitty Grimm back then people enjoy life and has sense of humour. Nowadays everyone's sensitive :/
i'm so glad someone's here to defend the poor MEN!!!!! GOD SAVE THE MEN!!!!
Kitty Grimm
I totally agree... If the genders were reversed, it will be totally different...
You're right... it would not have been...
and its totally his fault cause he totally knew she wasnt 18 and everyone else on the planet ask for an id from everyone they fuck right?
6:22 I love how she thought she could walk away here. If I were Chase, I'd be wearing a wire to record all this and her confession would get her jail time.
Same here.
Wearing that wire could get you a felony conviction in about half the country.
@@nunya3163 no, recording conversations only needs a single person consenting. he can record it without any legal consequences.
Wait you watch this show too
@@salaali8918 who are you
Totally terrible. This episode makes a mockery of revenge porn and makes it ok for women and not men
Thomas Lindell it's not okay for anyone to do regardless of their gender
Probably because it was written in an era where there were no such revenge porn laws and enforced to a lesser extent than today's standards.
@hahagotcha!!!! your body isn't public property, it's YOUR body, no one has the right to reveal any nude photos of you without consent unless they're somehow evidence in a criminal case. Having people change their behaviour because of what shitty people are doing is a terrible way to think. Forcing people to change through fear is called terrorism, they're spreading the fear that if you want to send a promiscuous picture to someone you love or your just sharing an attraction with. That's perfectly fine, you should absolutely should be allowed to do that without wondering how many other people are going to see that. Just because you get sent a private picture doesn't mean you own that image and can do with it as you please. Stop blaming the people who take the pictures then send them to the intended recipient, and start telling the people sharing hem around with whoever the hell they want when it's not their body to get their shit together.
@@devonchafe2764
That's not terrorism. Terrorism is violence inflicted against the populace.
"Having people change their behaviour because of what shitty people are doing is a terrible way to think." - You're probably thinking of "blackmail" instead.
@@devonchafe2764
That's not terrorism. Terrorism is violence inflicted against the populace.
"Having people change their behaviour because of what shitty people are doing is a terrible way to think." - You're probably thinking of "blackmail" instead.
The most annoying thing is when he apologizes in the end and asks the psycho out, like it's his fault for not looking for a serious relationship
Why did you have to use the slur ''psycho''? Do you think all mentally ill (or whatever you imply by ''psycho') are vengeful stalkers?
@@yevgeniyaleshchenko849 Psycho implies psychotic, which she is. Christ! Go look for something else to be mad about.
yeah you're right it's more insulting to the psychos to be compared to her
Yeah, imagine being a man.
She's just confesses to criminal invasion of privacy, unauthorized access to confidential data and intentional infliction of emotional distress.
That's about five years in the pokey right there!
And for some reason the writers then make chase apologize for no reason
That's not a prank it's a crime
No. It"s a movie
Two crimes.
@@tokegragulesson3409 no it's a series
Deffenetly a crime.
it’s photoshopped.
the ending is a stalker's dream
Hold up... 😂😂
And if the genders were reversed she would have been fired, jailed and probably sued.
Thats not true. there are basically no cases of people being charged for revenge porn (because its new) and it happens SO MUCH more to women then too men.
@@freyjamulhall3615 Just because it happens to women more than men doesn't mean it's still justified
men don't get in trouble for anything. Look at the statistics. Haven't you heard of the Brooke turner who only got two years for rape. The justice system is so much harsher for women. The average prison sentence of men who kill their women partners is 2 to 6 years, women who kill their male partners are sentence on average to 15 years. This is despite the fact that 86% of female offenders kill in self defence, while males are most likely to kill out of possessiveness (82%), abuse (75%) and during augments (63%).
Freyja Mulhall source plz?
Freyja Mulhall
Yeah... gonna need a fact-check on your source(s), cause I’m just getting the tiniest whiff of bullshit.
' I still have the heels '
Chase really takes a second to contemplate
This comment section has restored my faith in humanity. Good to see people recognise how wrong this plot was
I wonder how funny this would be if the genders were revered.
Exactly my thoughts
reversed
All hell would break loose
GabrielKnightz you mean if it happened to 13 and they made her breasts Double D's instead of double a batteries?
Still funny
As a woman (and a feminist), this subplot made me uncomfortable. This has happened to quite a few of my friends and acquaintances and it almost ruined them. Just because Chase is a guy, that doesn’t make this comedic. What this girl did was WRONG. I don’t know why it’s taken so lightly in the show.
@Pissdrinker violence and violation is hardly shown as funny, this is a once off. Violence and violation of women is thou
If the genders were switched, chase would be in a courtroom
I believe in real equality. If she didn't get any kinda punishment then it's okay for a man to do it too.
@@shrimpfry880 OJ didn't get punished for killing his wife, so it should be okay for me to do it too
@@turningmememachine7256 people who say "male nudity can be used for comedic purposes cause men are less shameful about their nudity" >>>>> people who say "OJ killing his wife is okay"
Did he really apologize and ask her out??? Like hell no if a man did that to me I would definitely be calling the cops
He should call the cops on her. Revenge porn is illegal.
so if you leaked a guys nudes and he asked you out you would call the police on *him* please explain your flawed logic
@@natejanisse5745 if he leaked her nudes
@@natejanisse5745 No she is relating the situation to herself and saying that Chase should have called the cops.
Firebenderkitty3 ah i see i see
6:11 Yeah, she is a psycho
"You deserve this because we talked for 5 minutes, i didn't want to sleep with you, and you leave me alone instead of being a creep"
imagine if the roles were inverted, that would've been HILARIOUS right??????
Or worse: "I didn't want to sleep with you and you wouldn't leave me alone" lol
damned if you do, damned if you don't
"We talked for 5 minutes and you walked away. I'm gonna make you pay because you didn't want me."
"Actions have consequences"
*literally commits a crime*
Wow! that woman is a genius. She manipulated the victim of her cyber crime to not only apologize but also make amends for any perceived aggrievance on his part. Bravo!
You better be joking. 🤢🤮
Women 101, when losing a discussion change the subject and make the man look guilty, if is not enough, humiliate him. It is not much if comes with the cromossomes.
@@pbonfanti You don't understand chromosomes, do you?
I was expecting these comments to be full of cancer, but honestly, UA-cam you have slightly redeemed my faith in humanity. This was not okay in any way and is a total double standard. Nobody owes you anything indeed.
If you looked some bad comments have come through mostly through replies
They are full of whiny men crying.
@@gales9969 No, they are full of fair-minded, level-headed, not-completely-batshit-insane men AND women who can recognize a double-standard when they see one
and are calling the writers out for it. And this isn't even about men vs. women; as Billy Hatzi pointed out above, this is about "a person trying to enforce a conception of morality on someone else's sexuality, and if that doesn't seem as sinister as it should in this context...the same characterization applies to the bully who spray paints "FAGGOT" on a homosexuals car." I would think someone who supports gay rights could see and appreciate that point.
thats because people stand up for men more then women, weather the people commenting "if the roles were reversed" want to admit it or not if the roles were reversed there would be thousands of people commenting sexist stupid stuff, more then on this video. thats the world we live in.
@@freyjamulhall3615, do you always make statements without evidence?
"People stand up for men more [than] women" lol... please, I can only take in so much stupidity.
Some things just don't age well.
This one didn't age at the time. It was always a WTF? from the writing staff, and took a lot of flack even at the time.
Simply awful writing. Then and now.
Was real bad then too.
@Average Joesson why?
Jeez.. People have become such a snowflakes. No wonder where this SJW bullshit lifes and blossom now.
@@OkSid300 nah I hate cancel culture, political correctness, and whatnot but this is disgusting to my guts lol
"My proof is right here, really want to see it?" Chase has no chill lol.
I am very much opposed to the way Chase's situation is played off as a joke. He didn't do anything wrong, just wasn't interested in her. She even gets rewarded for it and is played as the good guy by the end of the whole situation when Chase asks her out???However, I'm very interested in the difference in reactions between this episode and the comments and the episode where the intersex model is aggressively misgendered. Just interesting what people think is acceptable vs. not-acceptable as time moves forward.
This isn’t justified at all lol. So a guy blew you off? Won’t be the first time and won’t be the last. You resort to revenge porn? Lmao
Wait a second....isn't it illegal what she did?
"You so deserve this"....I cant....
I think it wasn't back in the day. Doesn't make it any less wrong.
I can’t believe he apologised, and even asked her out... wtf
The writer made him do it and guess what the writer is a women surprise surprise
Ah yes a prank, which involves committing cybercrimes.
"crimes" um they weren't time-travelers
She should’ve been charged, wtf?! How dare the writers even use a subplot like this and make light of it
she got mad at him because he was honest in the sense that he didn't believe in the no sex on the first date rule? she was wrong to do that to him!
She should have gotten in trouble, it’s so wrong to post photos without a person consent
He should sue her. Put her in jail.
“I started to take them off and then you asked me very nicely not too”
I see that Chase and I have similar taste.
I think the intent of this episode was to show Chase's sex life at the time was unhealthy because he jumped the gun and avoided asking seemingly redundant questions. "Is she under 18?" "Is she single?" "Will anything bad occur from me sleeping with someone I just met at a wedding?" Which wouldn't be too bad of a topic to tackle since it wouldn't necessarily "constant sex is bad m'kay?" but instead like most episodes of House raise a philosophical question, in this case being when too much is too careless...but BOY OH BOY DID THEY SCREW THE POOCH ON THIS ONE!
Chase is in the end called out for admittedly blowing someone off harshly yet apparently that means escalating a situation by shaming him on the internet for his decision to not interact with her (actively avoiding a situation where she would feel uncomfortable because they both wanted different things) by plastering him as not a person but an OBJECT to be oggled at and/or ridiculed by is OKAY??? This is as bad as making fun of someone for being a sex worker because "lawl slut". Chase is demeaned for a mistake he made and she has no self-awareness of her own flaws, simply stating "i'd never do that"? He who is without sin can cast the first stone lady. What's that? You think anyone would be in the right when it came to something they were entitled to? Good, I know a group of people that everyone loves that feels the same way you should meet.
Women will lie about all those questions, and maybe lie on court later, so any men is open to trouble while interacting with women. Mike Pence rule exists for a reason.
Thats not okay...
At all...
Its illegal and immoral and why would u ask her out?????
story written by feminazi
Cause 0:48
That actually isn't negative reinformcent; it's positive punishment.
+ reinforcement= addition of something you like as reward
- reinformcent= removal of something you don't like as reward
+ punishment= adding something you don't like as punishment
- punishment= taking away something you like as punishment.
I caught that, too. Those slip-ups used to bother me, but Skinner's terminology is hazy in common usage. We all know what she meant.
Positive and negative is something pleasant or unpleasant happening to you. so obviously this is negative reinforcement. No different to if he was hit with a stick every time he performed some action. That's what people mean when they say you can teach using either "the carrot or the stick", IE> The carrot is the positive reinforcement, the stick is negative reinforcement. Calling it reinforcement vs punishment is a matter of perspective. If you're trying to teach/train someone someone in certain behaviour then what you're trying to do is "reinforce" a behaviour and you can use positive or negative ways to do it. When you are being given the stick it can be perceived as a punishment. You can also see that someone isn't trying to punish or reward you, but you can see that your own behaviour is still being positively or negative reinforced.
It doesn't need to be a conscious attempt to change behaviour. For example it can also result from revenge, so say you do something I don't like and I beat you up because I just want to hurt you. In any case your future behaviour will now be affected because something negative resulted from your behaviour. This is why abusive people can train people to become neurotic and self-hating by punishing good/healthy normal behaviour. This is negative reinforcement. Calling it punishment is entirely dependant on the point of view of the subject you're thinking about it from. For that reason it can be seen as punishment and not punishment at the same exact time. This is also why you can also positively reinforce behaviour unintentionally, but unintended behavioural outcomes are still going to result in positive and negative reinforcing of behaviour. This is why you can see "life" as punishing you, when you get negative outcomes to your behaviour. Life doesn't need to be giving you a lesson, but you can see it as a punishment all the same and regardless is still contributing to reinforcing behaviour.
In other words, what you're saying here is wrong as well as pedantic and they did not use this term inaccurately. It was both negative reinforcement as well as her "punishment". They are not contradictory.
@@TheSkepticalIdealist This is so wrong. They're literally definitions in a biology textbook and every med student will learn this. Original commentor is correct. Just because the general public use it incorrectly doesn't mean they don't have a very specific definition in an esoteric environment. You wrote all this but you could've saved yourself the humiliation if you've just consulted a textbook, or a quick google search for "BF Skinner's Chart" ...
@6:55 "Actions have consequences"... yea, in this case it's revenge porn. Felony in most states.
Have you heard of this concept called "time", these things called "dates" when laws are enacted and the fact that this show aired in 2011? Or were you not aware of any of these concepts?
Chase dogged a bullet at that last girl was complete psychopath
Yep this was an oldie when you realize they got away with this. Glad to see people are coming to their senses and seeing it as awful
18... next month
Why do they justify revenge porn? she should be in jail
she would only be in jail if Chase pressed charges which he didn't
"You are a beautiful man! Can i go now?" Classic! Lol
"You are a beautiful man. Can I leave now?"
Is the most Taub thing ever Taubed
7:08 It's way more meta than that. He's a great actor _playing_ a nice guy who lost his way.
I saw this episode when it premiered. I didnt find it cute then and I dont find it cute now, for a number of reasons.
1. I dont like those scenes where female characters publicly humiliate men over petty offenses, mainly because of the fact that in real life most of these stunts could lead to the guy getting arrested and put on the offender list.
2. They expected us to think Chase deserved all of this because he was pursuing women for sex while being young, and single. I call bull. This woman took a photo of him without his knowing, posted it online to various sites, stole money from his accounts and humiliated him in front of his coworkers IN A HOSPITAL. Im not a white collar dude, but I know that being a doctor, generally speaking because I know he got promoted in the end, is one of those jobs where a scandal could break someones career.
Theres no telling what kind of individuals might start showing up at his house or his job, or how much his finances were impacted. Yet all she could say was "actions have consequences" and "you needed negative reinforcement" over leaving her mid date. Chase had every right to record her confession and sue her afterwards.
3. Im all about gender equality in media, so it always annoys me when a show triess to make any male character that dare have a sex life outiide of marriage into a bad guy.
The lady who did this is absolutely terrible. I really don’t understand the perspective of the writers in this. Being a player doesn’t excuse humiliating sexual harassment, and then the writers make him “learn his lesson.” WHAT LESSON? DONT TALK TO WOMEN?
Chase and Foreman are such Bros. I can only imagine the shenanigans the two got up to after House and Wilson rode off into the sunset.
Girl: you don't have to leave, I still have those heels
Chase:🤔🤔🤔🤔
"Actions have consequences" girl you had ONE conversation with him and he decided not to pursue it and you decided to stalk him and publicly shame him. Thats like if he turned around and started posting pictures of you online because you WOULDNT sleep with him.
I don't like how what she did has been played off as perfectly acceptable and justifiable as a retaliation of what he did which, yes was shitty, but nothing compared to posting revenge porn of someone online. Edited or not.
"and then you asked me not to take the heels off"
My man...
As a heterosexual man, I wanna say- Chase is hot. Its really tough to build that body.
Respect mate
"Maybe you should flip a condom"
A HAhahahahahahahah that's hilarious 😂😂😂
1:21 awww cute.
Yeah apologize to that criminal.
Wth! I forgot all about this, but did he just asked her out after everything she has done to him! So a guy has different interests than yours and because you spent few minutes talking and he was honest to flee, you seek revenge!? 😮🙄 wth!
I love how you say about the time Chase spent with her. It was only one date,who gets that pissed about such a dumb slight? I'd understand if she found him and threw some juice, milkshake,or whatever cold drink.
Cameron messed him up bad xD
Honestly Chase reacted way way calmer than most people would. I'd be fucking furious
This was most certainly a swing and a miss by the writers
For those who are wondering the House is fictionaly based in NJ. The age of consent is.....16. He is in the clear.
doesn't make it morally okay, lots of things don't break laws but are still wrong.
That was disgusting from her. If you disagree, imagine a guy releasing a woman's nudes because she didn't find him interesting enough to sleep with him after a single meeting. In his shoes, I'd have pressed charges.
“Wait- Did you give me an STD?” I died 😂👌🏻
Lord have MERCY there's a lot to unpack here. most of which should be unpacked in the courtroom....
"AcTioNs haVe cOnseQuenCes" the lady is unhinged. Very crazy.
That woman was definitely a psychopath or a sociopath at the very least. Yuck. Who does that? Just imagine if every single woman who get politely rejected reacted this way, the guy did nothing wrong, he just lost interest, whatever the reason may be. 100% psychotic and a literal crime.
Oh my God I love that response. Forman “ he slept with three women there” girl to chase “ oh you’re a whore” 😂
All he did was excuse himself from the situation and she retaliated by committing a crime and humiliating him. Then he proceeds to not press chargers as if she didn’t deserve it for costing him his job.
0:47
I love her
2:33 "because physically how would you even know"
Reading these comments restored a bit of my faith in humanity...
I was pleasantly surprised reading the comments from women who called out that "Degenerate Piece of Shite" and what she did to Chase was disturbing and disgusting.
Who wrote this toxic garbage?
Nathan Holstrom no. Feminists want equal rights. This is not equal. She should be in jail and he shouldn't apologize
There's a difference between
1. Saying you want something
2. Thinking you want it
3. *Actually* wanting it
4. Acting on it
5. Acting *against* it
Feminists are doing #1 and #5.
They will talk about "toxic masculinity", but then continue to demonize and ridicule men as "pathetic" and "unmanly" if they dare stand up for their rights. They will get (rightfully) outraged if someone wants to stop abortions, but then get equally outraged if they are no longer allowed to force the legal responsibility of that child on a man who never wanted it. And they will explain almost any area where men are doing better as "oppression of women", but never call it "oppression of men" when the opposite happen - like in family courts, the female dominated educational system, life expectancy, suicide rates, sentencing in general etc.
@@michaelm3691 I love you
Whiny little man alert. Cry more plz, you people are beyond sad.
@@michaelm3691
Waaaaaaaahhhhhhhhj.😂😂😂😂
please tell me i wasn't the only one the thought that it was somehow house.
After none of the 3 admitted i was thinking *It must be House* o.O
She won't think it's funny when she goes to court!
This episode was not it, him being “into” her after she told him “well you are a jerk who sleeps with multiple women…. Soooo” and Chase was like: *smirks* wow you’re so confident and smart, I totally want to go out with you. This was super ridiculous, I hated that episode and how it made it “ok” for Chase’s privacy to be infringed.
He should've sent her to jail.