Adcock & Shipley milling machine restoration - part 11 (cotter for support arm)

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 2 жов 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 14

  • @Rustinox
    @Rustinox 8 місяців тому +1

    It reminds me the one I made for my lathe. But it wasn't that elaborated :)

    • @Workshopfriend
      @Workshopfriend  8 місяців тому +2

      Somehow I had missed your tailstock video. So I just watched it! Interesting that your lathe had an aluminium alloy cotter. As usual you got a good result in a fraction of the time!

  • @davidrichards5594
    @davidrichards5594 8 місяців тому

    nicely done. A 4 jaw scroll chuck is not too common in the US.....Dave

    • @Workshopfriend
      @Workshopfriend  8 місяців тому

      Thanks, Dave! I don't believe they are common here either.

  • @carlwilson1772
    @carlwilson1772 8 місяців тому

    Excellent job as always. Clear, lucid explanation of the design choices and the work flow path. I very much liked the inclusion of a land to ensure the clamping load is correctly distributed. I enjoyed your film very much.

    • @Workshopfriend
      @Workshopfriend  8 місяців тому

      Thanks Carl for your feedback. It is quite possible that this feature is redundant but it was easy to include just in case!

  • @andrewdolinskiatcarpathian
    @andrewdolinskiatcarpathian 7 місяців тому

    Hello Clive. I do like that you use traditional tools to measure and scribe your work pieces. As always, excellent work, clearly described and expertly accomplished. 👏👏👍😀

    • @Workshopfriend
      @Workshopfriend  7 місяців тому +1

      Hello Andrew. Perhaps the main reason I use traditional tools is that I don't have such equipment as DROs etc! Anyway glad you get something out of the videos.

  • @mftmachining
    @mftmachining 8 місяців тому

    Excellent job. TOP.

  • @EitriBrokkr
    @EitriBrokkr 8 місяців тому

    Is there any significance in 47* degree angles. Versus say 45* degrees?
    Do you think there is any chance of deforming the 2.5" cast iron bar. Clamping it with angles instead of a radius. Or is that too pessimistic?

    • @Workshopfriend
      @Workshopfriend  8 місяців тому +1

      Ah yes, it does seem a bit arbitrary! The angle was derived from the geometry - specifically tangential contact on the bar at the middle of the female cotter.
      I haven't done any calculations but I doubt the cast iron will permanently deform before the cotter yields. Of course everything is subject to elastic deformation.

    • @willemvantsant5105
      @willemvantsant5105 8 місяців тому +2

      Nice job however my OCD kicked in when you didn't true up the centre hole for potential rework😅.
      Looking forward to the boring operation of the lower support arm bore.

    • @Workshopfriend
      @Workshopfriend  8 місяців тому

      Well noted. Looking forward to the boring operation seems to be a contradiction!