Since the death of King Cardinal Henry IX Stuart to be more accurate. After his death, none of the Savoys, Lothringes, Wittelsbachs or Liechtensteins have cared about the Jacobite claims.
I'm a little biased, being a Stuart on my mom's side. We're first cousins to the Barons Strathcona (several times removed 😅). Joan of Arc's feast day is on my birthday. I've always wondered what would happen if...
I wait for the day the rightful the royal returns fea o'er the water. God bless the king, being him victorius, happy and glorious, bless the royal pair. Bring us a royal heir, and free o' Scotland from horrid Protestant'ry
That eir to the Jacobites will be the future king of America when the United States convert. This eir is also a descendant of kings Louis XIV of France and Philip V of Spain. A feudatory of the prophecied Holy Roman Emperor.
Great video thanks. I thought Neil Morison had it cracked with ‘The Real King of England’. Excellent and very challenging also and available on UA-cam . A very entertaining video also. Yours takes a different, but equally interesting view - and possibly more credible at that, but they are both based on sound fact. Anyway, I feel you’ve struck it right. The Monarchy and English Protestantism, including Anglicanism, are on the way out and The True Church will re-emerge in time - may take a while though. Thanks again for a great video. God bless
Yes that's why Versailles exists as a scotch Catholic I thank God for James pray for the Catholic church in Scotland....it's a horrible treachery by the Anglican church who destroyed the crown and Louise the king of France....well what can I say ...got to love a man who looks after his friends
St Thomas Aquinas and various Catholic theologians have states that it is moral to depose a tyrannical or immoral monarch if the criteria for just war is met. Not that the "Glorious Revolution" was a just war at all. However Divine Right of Kings is not dogma and if we follow it to the T then any king of England after 1066 A.D. is illegitimate
Reducing the monarch’s power and putting more power in the hands of the government sounds like it paved the way for the American Revolution, huh? Side note. Will you do a video on Simon of Trent?
brother, how do we get a monarch in the first place? like suppose we are making a new nation or our past monarchy bloodline is ended and we have no royal family, how to we get the first monarch?
I've thought about this, like hypothetically if America got a monarch who would it be? After the American Revolution there were some monarchists who wanted to instate a German prince as the King of America but that never happened. Maybe we would do the same thing or instate someone who is an American as the monarch.
No problem with Charles being King of England, but do have a problem with the church of england and the episcopal church and the king claiming to be head of that mess.
He’s the first legitimate king since 1685 as his chrism oil was from the Eastern Orthodox patriarch of Jerusalem. Hopefully he becomes a saint(person in heaven) as well and joins his ancestors before him!
1 Corinthians 3:18-23 Let no one deceive himself. If any one among you considers himself wise in this age, let him become a fool so as to become wise. For the wisdom of this world is foolishness in the eyes of God, for it is written: “He catches the wise in their own ruses,” and again: “The Lord knows the thoughts of the wise, that they are vain.” So let no one boast about human beings, for everything belongs to you, Paul or Apollos or Cephas, or the world or life or death, or the present or the future: all belong to you, and you to Christ, and Christ to God.
No it's not, not in the way it's been understood. There is such a thing as legitimate Christian monarchy, which reigns by divine right. But the idea that a king has a divine right just because he's a king is neither biblical nor Catholic.
There is only one king, who serves The Father, and will return one day. I care very little for the anglican church and their practices because Heny VIII was a fool. Catholicism is the only way
Eg see the duke of anjou prince louise xx the legitimate pretendor to the french Catholic throne his spanish part gives him a great chance of rasing a great and Catholic army being the duke of anjou see Louis XX roi fe france ,this eas richard the lions line,plus we have count of paris jean Orlean study theas men put captions on auto translation Louis XX recently called himself eldest son of the church. Although abolished he serves the Catholic people awards and medals for heroic civil deeds study him i tell you
Lol "Louis XX" is a modernist, not to mention he is from the isabeline line (which means he is a descendant of Isabel's lover and not her husband), he doesn't fulfill none of the two necessary requirements according to Salic Law to be King of France, not even King of Spain nor England. The same goes with orleanists who have tons of morganatic marriages and are strongly tied with Freemasonry. The only choice for French and English (since the jacobite claimants after Cardinal King Henry IX Stuart don't care the slightest about the British thrones) is a man none of them will ever recognize as their King even when he has all the requirements for it: The Duke of Aranjuez, Henry V of the House of Bourbon-Parma
As an American the title of "King" hasn't mattered in 250 years, and as a Catholic I'm not exactly a fan of their heretical "church" that attacked the true Church and Catholics for centuries. There are some monarchies I respect, and I still think the UK would be better under a king again than it's current rule that collapsed the empire, but I still oppose them as both an American and a Catholic. Besides, Christ is King not some old creep who isn't allowed near school yards cause his family likes to visit a certain Island.
Monarchy is still better than a political system where the leaders are chosen by a popularity contest. Biden's proof that winning an election doesn't make you fit to run a country.
Monarchy is the closest form of government to God. Do you think that the evils in our present society would ever be permitted in a country ruled by a king? - divorce, abortion, feminism, euthanasia, forcible injections, forcing us to accept gay culture, drag queen hours for children - six year olds being forced to perform oral sex in the classroom, children told that they can change their gender!!!! This could never be part of life under a Monarch because these things are contrary to the laws of God.
@@neilmcbeath954 Lol Telling the truth isn't lack of charity. It only shows you hate the truth, just like joos hate Our Lord because He rebuked them for their evil misdeeds and their lies
Tolerance of all religions is the same as Atheism
And freemasonry.
I never thought about it like this. You've presented a terrifying idea that the UK hasn't had a legitimate monarch all this time.
Since the death of King Cardinal Henry IX Stuart to be more accurate. After his death, none of the Savoys, Lothringes, Wittelsbachs or Liechtensteins have cared about the Jacobite claims.
They haven't. Fleur-de-lis on the crown should be glaring proof. But, people only believe what the tv tells them.
They haven't. How can a royal family that participates in global child sex trafficking and pedophilia be considered legitimate?
They changed their name to Windsor…it was actually a German name.
This channel is so underrated. I recently converted in large part due to your videos. Thank you!
Thank you. Thats awsome
Oh man, it's impossible for you to miss the mark. So well said, so well put together. Thank you for making these.
Thank you
@@imisschristendom5293 Who in your opinion has the rightful claim to the French Throne?
I'm a little biased, being a Stuart on my mom's side. We're first cousins to the Barons Strathcona (several times removed 😅). Joan of Arc's feast day is on my birthday.
I've always wondered what would happen if...
I wait for the day the rightful the royal returns fea o'er the water.
God bless the king, being him victorius, happy and glorious, bless the royal pair. Bring us a royal heir, and free o' Scotland from horrid Protestant'ry
That eir to the Jacobites will be the future king of America when the United States convert. This eir is also a descendant of kings Louis XIV of France and Philip V of Spain. A feudatory of the prophecied Holy Roman Emperor.
Who is that?
@@AzureSymbiote a descendant of James II and James III of the house of Stuarts.
We just have to wait for the gay one to croak.
There is something called the Royal Stuart Society, that might be a good step to political activism.
In other words, the rightful King of Spain, the Carlist Regent King Henry V of Borbón-Parma. Descendant of Louis XIV, Philip V and the House of Stuart
@@LuisRincon-wr4dm unfortunately, Carlists lost the peace.
Great video thanks. I thought Neil Morison had it cracked with ‘The Real King of England’. Excellent and very challenging also and available on UA-cam . A very entertaining video also.
Yours takes a different, but equally interesting view - and possibly more credible at that, but they are both based on sound fact.
Anyway, I feel you’ve struck it right. The Monarchy and English Protestantism, including Anglicanism, are on the way out and The True Church will re-emerge in time - may take a while though.
Thanks again for a great video.
God bless
Prince, king or emperor, you can be whatever you want, you can reject Authority of bishop of Rome, but you *can't* Escape Authority of God
Interesting
Very interesting. Thank you.
Yes that's why Versailles exists as a scotch Catholic I thank God for James pray for the Catholic church in Scotland....it's a horrible treachery by the Anglican church who destroyed the crown and Louise the king of France....well what can I say ...got to love a man who looks after his friends
St Thomas Aquinas and various Catholic theologians have states that it is moral to depose a tyrannical or immoral monarch if the criteria for just war is met. Not that the "Glorious Revolution" was a just war at all. However Divine Right of Kings is not dogma and if we follow it to the T then any king of England after 1066 A.D. is illegitimate
Yeah, but,
"we dont like the king because hes Catholic and had a son"
That is unjust in anyones book
@@imisschristendom5293 agreed. I already said that the "Glorious Revolution" was not a just war at all
Reducing the monarch’s power and putting more power in the hands of the government sounds like it paved the way for the American Revolution, huh?
Side note. Will you do a video on Simon of Trent?
brother, how do we get a monarch in the first place? like suppose we are making a new nation or our past monarchy bloodline is ended and we have no royal family, how to we get the first monarch?
I've thought about this, like hypothetically if America got a monarch who would it be? After the American Revolution there were some monarchists who wanted to instate a German prince as the King of America but that never happened.
Maybe we would do the same thing or instate someone who is an American as the monarch.
Thanks for the history lesson.
Freemasonry King 🇬🇧
No problem with Charles being King of England, but do have a problem with the church of england and the episcopal church and the king claiming to be head of that mess.
You could probably do a similar video on carlism.
He’s the first legitimate king since 1685 as his chrism oil was from the Eastern Orthodox patriarch of Jerusalem. Hopefully he becomes a saint(person in heaven) as well and joins his ancestors before him!
I'd want to inform the author of the video that there's rather unchaste imagery here that, perhaps, went unnoticed. 2:44
1 Corinthians 3:18-23
Let no one deceive himself. If any one among you considers himself wise in this age, let him become a fool so as to become wise.
For the wisdom of this world is foolishness in the eyes of God, for it is written:
“He catches the wise in their own ruses,”
and again:
“The Lord knows the thoughts of the wise, that they are vain.”
So let no one boast about human beings, for everything belongs to you,
Paul or Apollos or Cephas, or the world or life or death, or the present or the future: all belong to you,
and you to Christ, and Christ to God.
Where is the outdo music from?
I use power director to make the videos and use their stock music.
Tandem Triumphans
Im going to be the king.
The Divine right of kings is not a Catholic doctrine is it?
No it's not, not in the way it's been understood. There is such a thing as legitimate Christian monarchy, which reigns by divine right. But the idea that a king has a divine right just because he's a king is neither biblical nor Catholic.
Church of England
@@Callmethebreeze902 is it a CofE doctrine?
1:21-1:25 racism is not Catholic at all.
There is only one king, who serves The Father, and will return one day. I care very little for the anglican church and their practices because Heny VIII was a fool. Catholicism is the only way
There is not only one King; Christ is King of Kings, which implies that there are lesser Kings under Him.
☕
Eg see the duke of anjou prince louise xx the legitimate pretendor to the french Catholic throne his spanish part gives him a great chance of rasing a great and Catholic army being the duke of anjou see Louis XX roi fe france ,this eas richard the lions line,plus we have count of paris jean Orlean study theas men put captions on auto translation Louis XX recently called himself eldest son of the church. Although abolished he serves the Catholic people awards and medals for heroic civil deeds study him i tell you
Lol "Louis XX" is a modernist, not to mention he is from the isabeline line (which means he is a descendant of Isabel's lover and not her husband), he doesn't fulfill none of the two necessary requirements according to Salic Law to be King of France, not even King of Spain nor England.
The same goes with orleanists who have tons of morganatic marriages and are strongly tied with Freemasonry.
The only choice for French and English (since the jacobite claimants after Cardinal King Henry IX Stuart don't care the slightest about the British thrones) is a man none of them will ever recognize as their King even when he has all the requirements for it: The Duke of Aranjuez, Henry V of the House of Bourbon-Parma
He probably isnt legit but he's definitely hard on the eyes, a goofyer looking bloke as I have ever seen
Have you looked in a mirror?
He looked goofy when he was young but, now, I don't think so.
@@neilmcbeath954 absolutely, and I'm way more handsome than that old shoe, how about you? Lol
@@billveek9518 The blasts us all, - wait until you are 74.
@@neilmcbeath954 I'm 75
As an American the title of "King" hasn't mattered in 250 years, and as a Catholic I'm not exactly a fan of their heretical "church" that attacked the true Church and Catholics for centuries. There are some monarchies I respect, and I still think the UK would be better under a king again than it's current rule that collapsed the empire, but I still oppose them as both an American and a Catholic. Besides, Christ is King not some old creep who isn't allowed near school yards cause his family likes to visit a certain Island.
Monarchy is still better than a political system where the leaders are chosen by a popularity contest. Biden's proof that winning an election doesn't make you fit to run a country.
For such a professed catholic you demonstrate a remarkable lack of charity.
Monarchy is the closest form of government to God. Do you think that the evils in our present society would ever be permitted in a country ruled by a king? - divorce, abortion, feminism, euthanasia, forcible injections, forcing us to accept gay culture, drag queen hours for children - six year olds being forced to perform oral sex in the classroom, children told that they can change their gender!!!! This could never be part of life under a Monarch because these things are contrary to the laws of God.
@@neilmcbeath954 Lol Telling the truth isn't lack of charity. It only shows you hate the truth, just like joos hate Our Lord because He rebuked them for their evil misdeeds and their lies
@@neilmcbeath954 He's speaking truth.
Bruh this is larp
Larp as what?