@@mindfulmindsets9795 What was the motive of this video what message was he trying to give? He could count and read Another friend could count and say and then he talked about Predicting of an object through equation but couldn't get a picture of it doing it I don't know what message is he trying to give 🤔?
@@mindfulmindsets9795 f*ck podcasts. Means of knowledge dissemination are means of knowledge validation, but social media mindset nowadays makes people think they're the same thing but they are not. I think Feynman would rather to be giving his lectures and conferences, which is where a scientist actually belong
@mindfulmindsets9795 f*ck podcasts. Means of knowledge dissemination are not means of knowledge validation, but social media mindset nowadays makes people think they're the same thing but they are not. I think Feynman would rather to be giving his lectures and conferences, which is where a scientist actually belong
@@hariompareek5726 Feynman thought that we will never get to the point where we know all there is to know about the laws of nature. There will always be something more to discover.
@@vasukrishnamurthy1504 Absolutely, this last thought is so motivating and spritual. It keeps me wanting to wake up everyday to learn and discover something new.
What Feynman is describing is what's going on in our CONSCIOUS minds. Of course, much is also going on unconsciously, far more than we can be aware of through direct introspection. And we can train our unconscious minds to perform many tasks for us - quite complex tasks, some of them - which to a great extent can proceed in parallel. An example is driving a vehicle in traffic, operating the controls while maintaining a situational awareness, obeying abstract traffic rules, engaging the social protocols of merging and so on, all the while carrying on a conversation using our conscious minds. The point is, unconscious cognition is most of what we do with our minds. That's not surprising, since it's how those minds evolved. Consciousness, on the other hand, is a relatively new mental trick. We're forcing our mental processes into a linear sequence of steps, so that we can consider and verify each in turn before proceeding to the next. We're not longer processing thoughts in parallel but serially, narratively. This is a fairly heavy commitment of cognitive resources, but even so we can still perform some unconscious tasks in parallel with conscious problem solving. What we CAN'T do very easily is perform multiple conscious tasks in parallel. It seems that the narrative machinery of consciousness is heavily taxed by having to proceed stepwise: knowing where we are in the task at large, how we got to the current step, what we have to solve at this step, what comes next, how to double-check ourselves, how to know when we're done. If we're really striving to do well at this task, it takes up ALL of our available resources. And I think it's a high achievement that our minds can do it at all. What Feynman was doing, in order to get some task parallelism, was two things. First, he was practicing these tasks in order to offload them, at least partially, into his unconscious mind. And second, he was setting up the tasks so as to engage different parts of his mind. Language and vision are known to take place in different hemispheres of the brain, so perhaps each half could be working on a separate problem. But see how hard he had to work at it, in order to achieve this small success! It's a bit sobering, when we look at it from that perspective. Our brains are maybe not evolved very well to support conscious parallel processing. Still, look at how much we've achieved since our species gained conscious ability at all. The great thing about reasoning (which is a specific conscious skill) is not how fast it operates but how reliably. Two structural engineers solving the same problem will arrive at the same answer. That's why planes don't often fall out of the sky.
I've heard and read of Feynman, but this is the first time I've seen him on video. The thing that strikes me most about him is his passion and joy while talking about this subject, and also his humble attitude. A very cool dude indeed.
"Now I'm talking like a psychologist, and you know , I know nothing about this " . These are the best words I ever heard from a Genius . the joy and curiosity while speaking his topics makes him different from a ordinary person .
@@user-hh2is9kg9j Teachers don't have to be necessarily incredibly intelligent like feynman. They could inspire from feynman and use the perspective feynman had on science to teach students rather than explaining things to just make students pass the exam. Everybody can learn from feynman
Sagan talked about how 5 year old children ask the best questions....and how sad it is that by the time kids are 20 they have ceased to ask any questions .
"She is never gonna let us relax" Beautiful, this man brings me closer to my soul. It's so inspiring to look at him and others like him. These people not only remind me of my early days of curiosities in learning science but also inspire me about the fact that its not about the grades nor that am too late for in the end its all about learning and exploring and experimenting and failing living each day with a new zeal for a new creation. Lovely!
Being a kid ,, and a young curious mind i never thinked there is something call tough ,, because of sir richard feynman ,, really he inspires me a lot ,, a legend never dies ..
You got a lot of time and life ahead of you, kid. Use it and be the best at anything that you do. No matter what, don't be biased on anything, be curious and ready to learn and correct yourself at any point of time.
Feynman has discovered all by himself that people code information differently in their brain from one another. That's what neuroscience has tried to show by looking how gifted people work. For instance, people with incredible ability to perform calculus in their head. They use colour for example to code numbers. His brain certainly has efficient coding algorithm to remember about maths to describe his physics.
I'm a 76 year old theoretical physicist, retired about a year ago, and I've done calculus "in my head" for decades. Never has color entered the process.
I had the extraordinary joy of meeting and getting to know, just a little, Dick Feynman when i was at JPL/NASA and spent a lot of time on the Caltech campus .. He was a wonderful person, an amazing mind and heart, and i miss him to this day. ❤😢
amazing mind is ok but did you said heart didnt he party celebrate at the night they drop the atomic bomb and didnt such hit him one year later at sfo when he saw a construction site and associated with damage atomic bomb caused one year later he felt devestated as he articulated
WHAT IS GRAVITY IS, ON BALANCE, an INTERACTION that cannot be shielded or blocked. WHAT IS E=MC2 IS dimensionally consistent, AS TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE) !!! BALANCE AND completeness go hand in hand. GREAT !!! WHAT IS GRAVITY IS, ON BALANCE, an INTERACTION that cannot be shielded or blocked. (WHAT IS E=MC2 IS dimensionally consistent.) Consider what is the man (AND THE EYE ON BALANCE) who IS standing on WHAT IS THE EARTH/ground, AS touch AND feeling BLEND; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE); AS TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE !!! BALANCE AND completeness go hand in hand. WHAT IS GRAVITY IS, ON BALANCE, an INTERACTION that cannot be shielded or blocked. WHAT IS E=MC2 IS dimensionally consistent, AS “mass"/ENERGY involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE consistent WITH/AS what is BALANCED electromagnetic/gravitational force/ENERGY; AS TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE); AS gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE (ON BALANCE). INDEED, GRAVITATIONAL force/ENERGY IS proportional to (or BALANCED with/as) inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE); AS TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE !!! The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. WHAT IS E=MC2 IS dimensionally consistent !!! Accordingly, ON BALANCE, THE PLANETS (including what is THE EARTH) sweep out equal areas in equal times. Consider TIME (AND time dilation) ON BALANCE. WHAT IS E=MC2 is taken directly from F=ma, AS TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE). WHAT IS GRAVITY IS, ON BALANCE, an INTERACTION that cannot be shielded or blocked. WHAT IS E=MC2 IS dimensionally consistent !!! CLEARLY, gravity AND ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy are linked AND BALANCED opposites (ON BALANCE); as the stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. Consider TIME (AND time dilation) ON BALANCE. INDEED, TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE) !!! GREAT !!! ACCORDINGLY, ON BALANCE, the rotation of WHAT IS THE MOON matches the revolution. GREAT !!! WHAT IS E=MC2 IS dimensionally consistent. GREAT !!! It is a very great truth that the SELF represents, FORMS, and experiences a COMPREHENSIVE approximation of experience in general by combining conscious and unconscious experience. INDEED, the INTEGRATED EXTENSIVENESS of THOUGHT AND description is improved in the truly superior mind. BALANCE AND completeness go hand in hand. By Frank Martin DiMeglio
You can definitely see the pure joy and child-like wonder he has when explaining and going through his thought process on this subject matter. Even with me being a layman's on this topic, he influences me and makes me want to do research and learn more about what he is talking about. I appreciate this.
I just love listening to Richard talk, his enthusiasm and colourful descriptions, on top of his deep understanding of his content, makes it a joy to hear. Rest well Richard, you have taught us so much.
This is what artists learn academically, really about different ways of seeing things. This is why some informatics resonate with some people and dont with others. Feynman diagrams are a perfect example of this.
His description of estimating time is a classic experimental psychology effect that is used to show the use of common mental resources in reaction time tasks. The fact that Tukey had interference with reading suggests that visual processing is being used, whereas Feynman had interference with speaking indicates auditory resources were common to the tasks. The idea that different people can do the two simultaneous tasks differently is very insightful, and I bet this has been studied by this point by psychologists.
This was something i noticed in highschool, thanks to how much people asked me to explain things to them, even when we were at the same level sometimes the way i explain something easily to someone wouldn't work on another, one could understand the graphic and imagine it while the other has a notebook in their head where they can solve calculus with no need to write it down, it s quite wonderful to be honest 👍🏻
I have always been an admirer of how Richard Feynman succeeds in communicating complicated concepts such as the structure and behavior of atoms to lay people. Now I am in awe as to how he explains why he cannot communicate complicated concepts of basis physics to lay people.
Why is it that whenever I come across Dr. Fynmans's video, i get emotional, I mean the kind of simplicity he holds is commendable, may his legacy live forever.
Well he put me in my place. Here I am thinking when should i grab coffee and muffin is a goal worthy to live for. Feynman is calibrating his personal sense of time and discovering the disconnect in our perception in conversations with each other. I get so full of myself sometimes I needed to watch this to be brought back to earth.
Thank you Feynman; when I'm confused about if I have chosen the right thing to study or doubt my abilities, I can surely say his words get me out of the blurr almost every time
than you can not understand why on earth he was so excited the day they dropped atomic bomb and went to party and celebrated lol your not missing much philosphy of science axiology semiotics is not his forte he was a high priest of science by the way when they dropped the atomic bomb they didnt know whether chain reaction will stop or not lol
i think his story about counting and reading and speaking is very insightful. I can play a melody on guitar and sing the words that go with the melody, but I cannot sing while playing rhythm. I can do all manner of things whith my hands while talking, but cannot talk or sing while playing rhythm guitar. Seems to be the same thing - the way my brain is working when I'm playing a musical instrument vs the way my brain needs to work when speaking or singing.
This can be trained tho... and it was, to me, the hardest thing to do while learn guitar. It's like teaching my brain to do two things at the same time, I don't remember when the breakthrough occurred but eventually I could play and sing. Gl on your journey.
4:48 "we calibrated him!" I've lost it here! 😂😂😂 This is brilliant! Lucky those who had opportunity to listen his lectures. I would be the happiest man in the universe if I could attend one of his lectures. Richard Feynman, genius, forever in our hearts. ❤
His last statement is the most true. Meditation is what I’ve learned is the best way to help the mind relax so that all we experience is our consciousness.
The man goes on and on about a fascinating and simple experiment about human mind and its implications and finishes it up with "you know, I know nothing about this". Truly inspiring.
I read all this in his book - what do you care what other people think... and this has all come to life for. The 'imagery' of him saying that wasn't so vivid in my head after reading the book. Thank you for sharing.
The highest level of science is art and he shows this so well. Fascinating his affect as he describes these concepts, so intense. In his description of fundamental differences in our ways of thinking, he had realised more than many psychologists realise nowadays.
I seen many of video with him sitting in that same chair wearing that same shirt but I've never seen a video with this content, thank you and thumbs up.
as person who was interested in astronomy and physics since 8th grade. I am always surprised seeing the reaction of people when i describe to to them stars, blackholes and the intergalactic distances. I had just assumed that everyone knows about these things and everyone finds it fascinating! People ask me if i was a physicist before i took up my current profession. And i am like "oh so i wish"
Same. But I was interested in Science since nursery, though till 5th I usually see Science related videos on UA-cam or Discovery Science (back when it was good). Like you, I also thought my classmates also find these things intuitive sadly they don't aside from my best friend (a Wannabe astrophysicist). (Read my name)
@@Root-Admin Though I didn't mentioned, but since then I did learned some useful techniques on how to flex my knowledge properly while also gaining new knowledge.
@@TheKingBeyondEverything hey bro my friend is also interested in physics . He's also preparing to become a physicist. Could you pls stop your IG , I can connect you with him .
@@TheKingBeyondEverything what ? I couldn't understand . I just want to say that my friend is also very very passionate about physics but he couldn't find someone as passionate as him around him so just wanted to help him
When an ordinary man/w commit him/hself to understand things at the deepest level then s/he becomes extraordinary. This was precisely the case of Feynman.
He says there are no special people, I think that's because he can understand and take apart things so easily, and he's so humble that he thinks everyone has this ability. They don't, he was a special individual and I wish he was still hear to inspire us with new thoughts and ideas.
This might one the best vids I’ve ever seen online, as a life long learner. Wow. I remember reading his books as a pre-teen in the 80s, this video really came back full circle for me. Thank you.
Since I was quite young I thought it would be the greatest experience in the world to know exactly how someone else thinks - to be able to totally think like someone else and actually be able to know how and why that differs to how you think...
Great footage. Shame the subtitling has so many inaccuracies, especially as it's likely to be hard for non-native speakers to pick up the way he switches tack mid-sentence. He was an incredible person.
Would be great and helpful if someone went back in and corrected the captioning instead of leaving it to the automatic program. Would be easy to do and improve the quality of this video dramatically.
This monotheist assumption of one true god without any logical backing and basis is kinda communal to say when there are other cultures co-existing which has same baseless belief of many gods at once. The concept of god is subject to faith and belief and lies withing faith segment only. Some people claim to see the god ..some people believe you can't see him...some people believe God is man and some say God is woman and some say God doesn't have any gender. Let's just respect what people say and keep exploring in scientific area. ❤
@@shubhankarsingh2605 got your point mate. But i believe science has no point on holding to morals example like we should not lie or steal. There is no scientific reason to stay away from them. Until we get science reason is it ok to steal or lie. And also we can only have faith or believe on something until it is hidden once it is revealed we cannot have faith or believe it could be true.hypothetically a cake imaging its creater similar to its feature will always be wrong. So we can figure out the features of God just by knowing this world. He must be beyond our knowledge. So we can only believe in him and follow the right thing having faith that our good deeds have values and get reward surely. Is the only reason to be good.
@@shubhankarsingh2605 but as you said respect others believe and explore what's right or wrong. If god wills, Knowledge with good morals will lead us in the right way. I appreciate your comment with zero hatred and lot of respect.
@@naveethsuraj6214 yeah I see you are looking at it from ethical POV, in science there is no right or wrong , all that their is hypothesis construction and looking out for evidences to propound a theory. Good or bad... right or wrong...sense of justice falls under the segment of one of the three major branches of philosophy called ethics, the other two being metaphysics and epistemology. Same nuclear science is giving world efficient energy and same science is used as most destructive weapon mankind has ever seen. So all this sense of good and bad and then the emotional needs of us humans lead to the concept of a god. Btw I am not an atheist just expressing my alternate views. I am a devotee of shiva ❤️
Might my thinking and contributions about reality be the kind of thinking Richard predicted would happen some day? Just thought his parting shot in this his presentation was so visionary and might just be being glossed over with the risk of being overlooked yet was so important!!!
He presented the classical and quantum approach of the world in such an artistic manner, There is a difference but we human still unable to absorb the knowledge due to absence of appropriate frame of reference maybe.We need to evolve some good translator in our brain to understand the language of nature.
if you are ever discouraged from science because of your self consciousness, just remember this man had a 125 IQ and was one of the most influential physicists. he knows what he's talking about at the beginning.
IQ is no indicator of success and effectivity in the real world. The creators of IQ tests are the worst idiots in history. Einstein, Feynman, Oppenheimer, Farnsworth, Alan Turing and countless others whose supreme intellect have made human life better in this planet never had pretensions of having the capability to measure another person's intelligence. The first man who invented the first wheel is to me the person more respect than the man who invented the IQ TEST. The latter is as useless as the one who invented cigarettes and illegal drugs. And their believers are as low as the dogs of Pavlov. The world would have lost a physicist who is as great as Richard Feynman if after High School he was discouraged to pursue higher education with a not too high IQ score. And the IQ test author who pretended to quantify Mr. Feynman's intellect, may we know what you have contributed to the whole body of knowledge in this world? Who knows, Feynman may have gotten that score just because his mind is beyond his examiner's and because he found the questions foolish, he just gave them little attention? That he got an IQ of only 124 is by no means conclusive of his mind's limit. If IQ tests were true, then all IQ examiners and IQ test Top notch examinees should be the exact models of virtue as far as human achievements are concerned. This is clearly not the case. If you follow the logic of IQ tests, then you will be regaled by the tale that Marilyn Vos Savant is the better thinker than Feynman which is not necessarily the case. It is just that if you believe in IQ TESTS, there is something wrong about your mind.
He had the highest math scores in the country in high school. He thought IQ tests were silly, but he's one of the most brilliant math and physics minds in human history. He had no need for linguistic rules that cluttered IQ tests in his day.
IQ tests don't measure intelligence, anyway. That's a big misconception. What they really do is measure how well you've learned something. Most IQ tests in the US measure how well you've learned what's taught in public schools. So, who knows what happened to Mr. Feynman when he took his IQ test. Maybe he was bored in school and didn't pay attention. Or maybe he had a bad year or month or day.
Having studied Feynman and read his books and watched his lectures I could easily ignore the subtitles that weren't correct... but it does seem like someone should have proofed them before they posted this. It seems likely that they missed a great deal of the points Feynman was trying to communicate which is a great shame. I spend a great deal of time trying to figure out what the train of thought was, how leaps of intuition led to the answers/discoveries we've made that seem so counterintuitive/monumental. It fascinates me.
It's unfortunately distracting. The captioning errors are so numerous that I found myself rewinding over bits so that I could hear Dr. Feynman clearly. Because watching him explain is often as illuminating as listening, I resisted the urge to just close my eyes. Of course, it may work differently for others. What a gifted man.
This man does not understand the meaning of a gift to think deeply. It’s the arrogance of intellectuals here on display that baffles me to no end. Each of us travels a road no one else does. Because we arrive at at a destination does not mean another will. Some stumble (continuously), some fall (unable to get up) and some like this man are blessed in finding his place. Everything is as it is so other things can be as they are. Our blessing is he has arrived in a place that can help all of us.
so fulfilling to watch this. the end is even more satiating to hear... nature's imagination is so much greater than man and she's never going to let us relax.
Richard discovered himself through inner projection, The synchronicity of learning and bonding with the greater Conscious comes to the ones that seek for all. A thinking universe!
It’s crazy how The Cosmic Wealth Frequencies book on Borlest is ignored-people don’t even realize what they’re missing.
Man I wish he was alive in the age of podcasts. He would’ve delivered so many insights to millions of people
@@mindfulmindsets9795
What was the motive of this video what message was he trying to give?
He could count and read
Another friend could count and say and then he talked about Predicting of an object through equation but couldn't get a picture of it doing it
I don't know what message is he trying to give 🤔?
@@mindfulmindsets9795 f*ck podcasts. Means of knowledge dissemination are means of knowledge validation, but social media mindset nowadays makes people think they're the same thing but they are not. I think Feynman would rather to be giving his lectures and conferences, which is where a scientist actually belong
@mindfulmindsets9795 f*ck podcasts. Means of knowledge dissemination are not means of knowledge validation, but social media mindset nowadays makes people think they're the same thing but they are not. I think Feynman would rather to be giving his lectures and conferences, which is where a scientist actually belong
@@whoami0x is that sarcasm?
@@rholanddelamerced no I'm trying to understand
Love the last thought in the segment: “Nature’s imagination is so much greater than man’s, that she is never going to let us relax”.
What does that mean??
@@hariompareek5726 Feynman thought that we will never get to the point where we know all there is to know about the laws of nature. There will always be something more to discover.
@@vasukrishnamurthy1504 Absolutely, this last thought is so motivating and spritual. It keeps me wanting to wake up everyday to learn and discover something new.
@@vasukrishnamurthy1504 thankyou.
Yes
What Feynman is describing is what's going on in our CONSCIOUS minds.
Of course, much is also going on unconsciously, far more than we can be aware of through direct introspection. And we can train our unconscious minds to perform many tasks for us - quite complex tasks, some of them - which to a great extent can proceed in parallel. An example is driving a vehicle in traffic, operating the controls while maintaining a situational awareness, obeying abstract traffic rules, engaging the social protocols of merging and so on, all the while carrying on a conversation using our conscious minds.
The point is, unconscious cognition is most of what we do with our minds. That's not surprising, since it's how those minds evolved.
Consciousness, on the other hand, is a relatively new mental trick. We're forcing our mental processes into a linear sequence of steps, so that we can consider and verify each in turn before proceeding to the next. We're not longer processing thoughts in parallel but serially, narratively.
This is a fairly heavy commitment of cognitive resources, but even so we can still perform some unconscious tasks in parallel with conscious problem solving. What we CAN'T do very easily is perform multiple conscious tasks in parallel. It seems that the narrative machinery of consciousness is heavily taxed by having to proceed stepwise: knowing where we are in the task at large, how we got to the current step, what we have to solve at this step, what comes next, how to double-check ourselves, how to know when we're done. If we're really striving to do well at this task, it takes up ALL of our available resources. And I think it's a high achievement that our minds can do it at all.
What Feynman was doing, in order to get some task parallelism, was two things. First, he was practicing these tasks in order to offload them, at least partially, into his unconscious mind. And second, he was setting up the tasks so as to engage different parts of his mind. Language and vision are known to take place in different hemispheres of the brain, so perhaps each half could be working on a separate problem.
But see how hard he had to work at it, in order to achieve this small success! It's a bit sobering, when we look at it from that perspective. Our brains are maybe not evolved very well to support conscious parallel processing. Still, look at how much we've achieved since our species gained conscious ability at all. The great thing about reasoning (which is a specific conscious skill) is not how fast it operates but how reliably. Two structural engineers solving the same problem will arrive at the same answer. That's why planes don't often fall out of the sky.
I need crux
1:00
this childlike enthusiasm and curiosity is what made him a great teacher and a scientist!
That moment was adorable! I'm glad there's people like him
He _really_ laughs like Sheldon Cooper here lmao
@@romzeek YES, THATS WHAT I THOUGHT. Maybe they got the idea from him?
Children are not curious.
I've heard and read of Feynman, but this is the first time I've seen him on video. The thing that strikes me most about him is his passion and joy while talking about this subject, and also his humble attitude. A very cool dude indeed.
He’s genuine
I highly recommend the book Genius by James Gleick. It is an incredible book about him.
He looks like such a kind person!
@@Jinsun202 easily 25+ hours of his content. Strongly suggest consuming it all, including his technical stuff.
"Now I'm talking like a psychologist, and you know , I know nothing about this " . These are the best words I ever heard from a Genius . the joy and curiosity while speaking his topics makes him different from a ordinary person .
Wow. Every time I listen to Richard Feynman, my mind expands, from realizing there are so many more levels and dimensions to understanding.
always so excited about the subjects he has studied. and genuinely wishes to impart his knowledge to others
@planetsaturnclub
BUT THE BIBLE IS THE WORD OF GOD....LOL...I WISH I WAS ALIVE 500 YEARS FROM NOW TO SEE HOW PRIMATES WILL VIEW JESUS LIKE ZEUS....
This is what a teacher should be. Enjoying exploring things, enjoying explaining those things.
Feynman is a one in 100 million, we can't find teachers in every school like him.
@@user-hh2is9kg9j Teachers don't have to be necessarily incredibly intelligent like feynman. They could inspire from feynman and use the perspective feynman had on science to teach students rather than explaining things to just make students pass the exam. Everybody can learn from feynman
Sagan talked about how 5 year old children ask the best questions....and how sad it is that by the time kids are 20 they have ceased to ask any questions .
"She is never gonna let us relax" Beautiful, this man brings me closer to my soul. It's so inspiring to look at him and others like him. These people not only remind me of my early days of curiosities in learning science but also inspire me about the fact that its not about the grades nor that am too late for in the end its all about learning and exploring and experimenting and failing living each day with a new zeal for a new creation. Lovely!
true 👍
agree
i will save your comment as a personal quote, reading this was so inspiring, thank you!
@@It_guy613for me too
Never give up
I will not too!
It is amazing how we can share this very message with you
What a pleasure it is to listen to such brilliant minds!
Being a kid ,, and a young curious mind i never thinked there is something call tough ,, because of sir richard feynman ,, really he inspires me a lot ,, a legend never dies ..
You got a lot of time and life ahead of you, kid. Use it and be the best at anything that you do. No matter what, don't be biased on anything, be curious and ready to learn and correct yourself at any point of time.
@@reddington7364 Thank you!
How old are you now ?
''thought'' not thinked
@@starsandnightvision dude! What does it even mean, atleast you understood na what he want to say.
Feynman has discovered all by himself that people code information differently in their brain from one another. That's what neuroscience has tried to show by looking how gifted people work. For instance, people with incredible ability to perform calculus in their head. They use colour for example to code numbers. His brain certainly has efficient coding algorithm to remember about maths to describe his physics.
Penrose mentions his own experience with his thinking and others in the emperors mind
I might agree with what you saif but that colourthing is your own imagination
Feynman...what a Mensch..
@@theawantikamishra they actually do use colors and shapes
I'm a 76 year old theoretical physicist, retired about a year ago, and I've done calculus "in my head" for decades. Never has color entered the process.
Such a profound understanding of physics with this level of humility can be expected only from Feynman ! A true genius.
I had the extraordinary joy of meeting and getting to know, just a little, Dick Feynman when i was at JPL/NASA and spent a lot of time on the Caltech campus .. He was a wonderful person, an amazing mind and heart, and i miss him to this day. ❤😢
how old are you?
amazing mind is ok but did you said heart didnt he party celebrate at the night they drop the atomic bomb and didnt such hit him one year later at sfo when he saw a construction site and associated with damage atomic bomb caused one year later he felt devestated as he articulated
WHAT IS GRAVITY IS, ON BALANCE, an INTERACTION that cannot be shielded or blocked. WHAT IS E=MC2 IS dimensionally consistent, AS TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE) !!! BALANCE AND completeness go hand in hand. GREAT !!!
WHAT IS GRAVITY IS, ON BALANCE, an INTERACTION that cannot be shielded or blocked. (WHAT IS E=MC2 IS dimensionally consistent.) Consider what is the man (AND THE EYE ON BALANCE) who IS standing on WHAT IS THE EARTH/ground, AS touch AND feeling BLEND; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE); AS TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE !!! BALANCE AND completeness go hand in hand.
WHAT IS GRAVITY IS, ON BALANCE, an INTERACTION that cannot be shielded or blocked. WHAT IS E=MC2 IS dimensionally consistent, AS “mass"/ENERGY involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE consistent WITH/AS what is BALANCED electromagnetic/gravitational force/ENERGY; AS TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE); AS gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE (ON BALANCE). INDEED, GRAVITATIONAL force/ENERGY IS proportional to (or BALANCED with/as) inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE); AS TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE !!! The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. WHAT IS E=MC2 IS dimensionally consistent !!! Accordingly, ON BALANCE, THE PLANETS (including what is THE EARTH) sweep out equal areas in equal times. Consider TIME (AND time dilation) ON BALANCE.
WHAT IS E=MC2 is taken directly from F=ma, AS TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE). WHAT IS GRAVITY IS, ON BALANCE, an INTERACTION that cannot be shielded or blocked. WHAT IS E=MC2 IS dimensionally consistent !!!
CLEARLY, gravity AND ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy are linked AND BALANCED opposites (ON BALANCE); as the stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. Consider TIME (AND time dilation) ON BALANCE.
INDEED, TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE) !!! GREAT !!!
ACCORDINGLY, ON BALANCE, the rotation of WHAT IS THE MOON matches the revolution. GREAT !!!
WHAT IS E=MC2 IS dimensionally consistent. GREAT !!!
It is a very great truth that the SELF represents, FORMS, and experiences a COMPREHENSIVE approximation of experience in general by combining conscious and unconscious experience. INDEED, the INTEGRATED EXTENSIVENESS of THOUGHT AND description is improved in the truly superior mind. BALANCE AND completeness go hand in hand.
By Frank Martin DiMeglio
@@georgepf4435 Don't, just don't ok. :)
I’m sorry did you just say Dick Feynman?!? 😂 I suppose if you’ve met him that’s cool. I’m going to start referring to him as “Big Richard Feynman”. 😮
I really love Richard Feynman. Imagine if everyone were as open and curious as him.
You can definitely see the pure joy and child-like wonder he has when explaining and going through his thought process on this subject matter. Even with me being a layman's on this topic, he influences me and makes me want to do research and learn more about what he is talking about. I appreciate this.
The entire 2 hour-long Horizon programmes this was nicked from is beautiful!
I just love listening to Richard talk, his enthusiasm and colourful descriptions, on top of his deep understanding of his content, makes it a joy to hear. Rest well Richard, you have taught us so much.
This man is the very reason why people wonder why I'm curious.
This is what artists learn academically, really about different ways of seeing things. This is why some informatics resonate with some people and dont with others. Feynman diagrams are a perfect example of this.
"Nature' imagination is so much greater, then men', -
she's never going let us relax"... - Bravo! ❤🙏🏻✌🏻
His father went to our synagogue in NYC in 50s. Miss this genius.
His college lectures are fun to watch. He was a very charismatic man.
His description of estimating time is a classic experimental psychology effect that is used to show the use of common mental resources in reaction time tasks. The fact that Tukey had interference with reading suggests that visual processing is being used, whereas Feynman had interference with speaking indicates auditory resources were common to the tasks. The idea that different people can do the two simultaneous tasks differently is very insightful, and I bet this has been studied by this point by psychologists.
Richard Feynman is my idol. I really want to become like him but can't become Richard Feynman as God is always God 😊❤❤😌
Wait. What?
This never fails to inspire no matter how many times I watch
wow listen to this man is like listening to your favourite music, you enjoy every bit of it
You can’t help but like him. One of my favourite people to listen to.
This was something i noticed in highschool, thanks to how much people asked me to explain things to them, even when we were at the same level sometimes the way i explain something easily to someone wouldn't work on another, one could understand the graphic and imagine it while the other has a notebook in their head where they can solve calculus with no need to write it down, it s quite wonderful to be honest 👍🏻
This man made me captivated and dive into a different realm for 11 mins.
I love thoughts like this. When he speaks about counting a minute while talking about something, etc.
I have always been an admirer of how Richard Feynman succeeds in communicating complicated concepts such as the structure and behavior of atoms to lay people. Now I am in awe as to how he explains why he cannot communicate complicated concepts of basis physics to lay people.
The best communicators deeply appreciate how difficult it is
Why is it that whenever I come across Dr. Fynmans's video, i get emotional, I mean the kind of simplicity he holds is commendable, may his legacy live forever.
Well he put me in my place. Here I am thinking when should i grab coffee and muffin is a goal worthy to live for. Feynman is calibrating his personal sense of time and discovering the disconnect in our perception in conversations with each other. I get so full of myself sometimes I needed to watch this to be brought back to earth.
Thank you Feynman; when I'm confused about if I have chosen the right thing to study or doubt my abilities, I can surely say his words get me out of the blurr almost every time
He talk with so much excitement, I watch & listen with excitement. But I can't understand 10% bits before I read explanations from comments. Thank you
than you can not understand why on earth he was so excited the day they dropped atomic bomb and went to party and celebrated lol your not missing much philosphy of science axiology semiotics is not his forte he was a high priest of science by the way when they dropped the atomic bomb they didnt know whether chain reaction will stop or not lol
i think his story about counting and reading and speaking is very insightful. I can play a melody on guitar and sing the words that go with the melody, but I cannot sing while playing rhythm. I can do all manner of things whith my hands while talking, but cannot talk or sing while playing rhythm guitar. Seems to be the same thing - the way my brain is working when I'm playing a musical instrument vs the way my brain needs to work when speaking or singing.
This can be trained tho... and it was, to me, the hardest thing to do while learn guitar.
It's like teaching my brain to do two things at the same time, I don't remember when the breakthrough occurred but eventually I could play and sing.
Gl on your journey.
John Lennon played rhythm and sang pretty well
It is amazing that people at the zenith of any field automatically imbibe a spiritual vibe!
The joy of learning . He would have made an amazing preschool teacher 🙏
4:48 "we calibrated him!"
I've lost it here! 😂😂😂 This is brilliant!
Lucky those who had opportunity to listen his lectures. I would be the happiest man in the universe if I could attend one of his lectures.
Richard Feynman, genius, forever in our hearts. ❤
His last statement is the most true. Meditation is what I’ve learned is the best way to help the mind relax so that all we experience is our consciousness.
He is so sure of future scientists getting further than him. Bless his soul.
The man goes on and on about a fascinating and simple experiment about human mind and its implications and finishes it up with "you know, I know nothing about this". Truly inspiring.
Every time I hear this man speak my life is enriched.
Being a Teacher of Science and Mathematics Only Feyman is my Inspiration ❤❤
How wonderful it is to Preserve The Phenomena
I read all this in his book - what do you care what other people think... and this has all come to life for. The 'imagery' of him saying that wasn't so vivid in my head after reading the book. Thank you for sharing.
WOW. What an absolute gem to listen early morning.
Yeah, first thing I listened to this morning. A great start to the day!
The highest level of science is art and he shows this so well. Fascinating his affect as he describes these concepts, so intense. In his description of fundamental differences in our ways of thinking, he had realised more than many psychologists realise nowadays.
I seen many of video with him sitting in that same chair wearing that same shirt but I've never seen a video with this content, thank you and thumbs up.
Sir yours lecture series is greatly appreciated for all the physiciest
as person who was interested in astronomy and physics since 8th grade. I am always surprised seeing the reaction of people when i describe to to them stars, blackholes and the intergalactic distances.
I had just assumed that everyone knows about these things and everyone finds it fascinating!
People ask me if i was a physicist before i took up my current profession.
And i am like "oh so i wish"
Same. But I was interested in Science since nursery, though till 5th I usually see Science related videos on UA-cam or Discovery Science (back when it was good).
Like you, I also thought my classmates also find these things intuitive sadly they don't aside from my best friend (a Wannabe astrophysicist).
(Read my name)
@@Root-Admin Though I didn't mentioned, but since then I did learned some useful techniques on how to flex my knowledge properly while also gaining new knowledge.
@@TheKingBeyondEverything hey bro my friend is also interested in physics . He's also preparing to become a physicist. Could you pls stop your IG , I can connect you with him .
@@ThinkAboutThiss Well, That 2 were the only replies. You didn't need to say that. 😅
@@TheKingBeyondEverything what ? I couldn't understand . I just want to say that my friend is also very very passionate about physics but he couldn't find someone as passionate as him around him so just wanted to help him
he knows psychology better than any psychologists i have ever seen ... they way he explains the mental framework is awesome...
I know very little about this man but I want to know everything after watching that video
The brilliance of him really struck me
From today on, am getting my hands , ears and eyes on anything Feyman wrote and said! Genius! Genius!
this man is a poet with scientist terms and concepts.
Great Teaching from a Great Teacher.
When an ordinary man/w commit him/hself to understand things at the deepest level then s/he becomes extraordinary. This was precisely the case of Feynman.
He says there are no special people, I think that's because he can understand and take apart things so easily, and he's so humble that he thinks everyone has this ability. They don't, he was a special individual and I wish he was still hear to inspire us with new thoughts and ideas.
This man was a true legend
This might one the best vids I’ve ever seen online, as a life long learner. Wow. I remember reading his books as a pre-teen in the 80s, this video really came back full circle for me. Thank you.
Every time i see Feynmen in title I click😊
This Man Is A Genius ..!❤
Since I was quite young I thought it would be the greatest experience in the world to know exactly how someone else thinks - to be able to totally think like someone else and actually be able to know how and why that differs to how you think...
Just visiting to learn English
He doesn’t wanna admit it but he Is an artist
He is my hero ❤
The way he uttered "relax"
Felt like a master his telling his students to *relax*
Great footage. Shame the subtitling has so many inaccuracies, especially as it's likely to be hard for non-native speakers to pick up the way he switches tack mid-sentence. He was an incredible person.
Real brilliance is humility and passion … no bragging about how smart he is!
The words of a truly great man.
"I think nature's imagination is so much greater than man she's never going to let us relax" - Feynmann
It's a joy listening to Feynman lectures.
Would be great and helpful if someone went back in and corrected the captioning instead of leaving it to the automatic program. Would be easy to do and improve the quality of this video dramatically.
Thank-you,
For jazzing up these old Feynman videos.
It's really awesome!
Richard a wonderful teacher
everytime I listen to Richard, my mind is set straight and all distractions wither.
Was like listening to Yoda. Such great wisdom yet an unusual articulation and communication. Loved the mind experiment
this man changed my life. if he was alive it would be a mission to meet him and sit with his energy.
I would like to volunteer to correct the captioning. Professor Feynman needs to have his work properly presented
One of the most qualitative and expressive minds by a long shot in the previous century. Just amazing to hear him speak.
That's why I feel God is beyond imagination and we can never create a picture of him. Not able to see God doesn't mean he is not there. God is one.
You’re right just change the g to G
This monotheist assumption of one true god without any logical backing and basis is kinda communal to say when there are other cultures co-existing which has same baseless belief of many gods at once. The concept of god is subject to faith and belief and lies withing faith segment only. Some people claim to see the god ..some people believe you can't see him...some people believe God is man and some say God is woman and some say God doesn't have any gender. Let's just respect what people say and keep exploring in scientific area. ❤
@@shubhankarsingh2605 got your point mate. But i believe science has no point on holding to morals example like we should not lie or steal. There is no scientific reason to stay away from them. Until we get science reason is it ok to steal or lie.
And also we can only have faith or believe on something until it is hidden once it is revealed we cannot have faith or believe it could be true.hypothetically a cake imaging its creater similar to its feature will always be wrong. So we can figure out the features of God just by knowing this world. He must be beyond our knowledge. So we can only believe in him and follow the right thing having faith that our good deeds have values and get reward surely. Is the only reason to be good.
@@shubhankarsingh2605 but as you said respect others believe and explore what's right or wrong. If god wills, Knowledge with good morals will lead us in the right way. I appreciate your comment with zero hatred and lot of respect.
@@naveethsuraj6214 yeah I see you are looking at it from ethical POV, in science there is no right or wrong , all that their is hypothesis construction and looking out for evidences to propound a theory. Good or bad... right or wrong...sense of justice falls under the segment of one of the three major branches of philosophy called ethics, the other two being metaphysics and epistemology. Same nuclear science is giving world efficient energy and same science is used as most destructive weapon mankind has ever seen. So all this sense of good and bad and then the emotional needs of us humans lead to the concept of a god.
Btw I am not an atheist just expressing my alternate views. I am a devotee of shiva ❤️
Ive heard this mans name for the longest time but i never expected him to be such a jolly & happy person😊
Might my thinking and contributions about reality be the kind of thinking Richard predicted would happen some day? Just thought his parting shot in this his presentation was so visionary and might just be being glossed over with the risk of being overlooked yet was so important!!!
Just these two bits show what a great teacher he has been.
He presented the classical and quantum approach of the world in such an artistic manner, There is a difference but we human still unable to absorb the knowledge due to absence of appropriate frame of reference maybe.We need to evolve some good translator in our brain to understand the language of nature.
wikipedia language of thought hypothesis and philosophy of language articles contains your reference
She never gonna let us relax
Man!!! Y so much underrated
We really appreciate your gesture, check out our hindi channel as well at: ua-cam.com/video/u8BE02wgWEg/v-deo.html
💙🙏
@@thecosmologicalreality sure
What a beautiful mind this man has! I can only imagine it without having a clear picture! Just an approximation.👍👍👍
if you are ever discouraged from science because of your self consciousness, just remember this man had a 125 IQ and was one of the most influential physicists. he knows what he's talking about at the beginning.
I don't believe that he really has 125 IQ. He was super smart even when he was a child, he's gifted. If he taked IQ test he didn't taked seriously.
@@ranieromaximino668 125 iq is already top 5% of the population. Being smarter than 95% of people is definitely "super smart" already.
IQ is no indicator of success and effectivity in the real world. The creators of IQ tests are the worst idiots in history. Einstein, Feynman, Oppenheimer, Farnsworth, Alan Turing and countless others whose supreme intellect have made human life better in this planet never had pretensions of having the capability to measure another person's intelligence. The first man who invented the first wheel is to me the person more respect than the man who invented the IQ TEST. The latter is as useless as the one who invented cigarettes and illegal drugs. And their believers are as low as the dogs of Pavlov. The world would have lost a physicist who is as great as Richard Feynman if after High School he was discouraged to pursue higher education with a not too high IQ score. And the IQ test author who pretended to quantify Mr. Feynman's intellect, may we know what you have contributed to the whole body of knowledge in this world? Who knows, Feynman may have gotten that score just because his mind is beyond his examiner's and because he found the questions foolish, he just gave them little attention? That he got an IQ of only 124 is by no means conclusive of his mind's limit. If IQ tests were true, then all IQ examiners and IQ test Top notch examinees should be the exact models of virtue as far as human achievements are concerned. This is clearly not the case. If you follow the logic of IQ tests, then you will be regaled by the tale that Marilyn Vos Savant is the better thinker than Feynman which is not necessarily the case. It is just that if you believe in IQ TESTS, there is something wrong about your mind.
He had the highest math scores in the country in high school. He thought IQ tests were silly, but he's one of the most brilliant math and physics minds in human history. He had no need for linguistic rules that cluttered IQ tests in his day.
IQ tests don't measure intelligence, anyway. That's a big misconception. What they really do is measure how well you've learned something. Most IQ tests in the US measure how well you've learned what's taught in public schools. So, who knows what happened to Mr. Feynman when he took his IQ test. Maybe he was bored in school and didn't pay attention. Or maybe he had a bad year or month or day.
one of the best youtube video ever speaking the truths and observation about universe
I'm deeply inspired by your words sir 🙏🏻❣️
pretty much fine
too many cancels though
Feyman has persuaded me that I'm as smart as he is now. I feel pretty proud of that.........and how dare anyone ever disagree with me again.
I find it strange that no-one on the channel went in and corrected the obvious failures the subtitle AI had guessing what Richard was saying... weird.
Having studied Feynman and read his books and watched his lectures I could easily ignore the subtitles that weren't correct... but it does seem like someone should have proofed them before they posted this. It seems likely that they missed a great deal of the points Feynman was trying to communicate which is a great shame. I spend a great deal of time trying to figure out what the train of thought was, how leaps of intuition led to the answers/discoveries we've made that seem so counterintuitive/monumental. It fascinates me.
It's unfortunately distracting. The captioning errors are so numerous that I found myself rewinding over bits so that I could hear Dr. Feynman clearly. Because watching him explain is often as illuminating as listening, I resisted the urge to just close my eyes. Of course, it may work differently for others.
What a gifted man.
Our greatest mind, professor Feynman. Einstein refuted QM. Feynman polished it off.
This man does not understand the meaning of a gift to think deeply. It’s the arrogance of intellectuals here on display that baffles me to no end. Each of us travels a road no one else does. Because we arrive at at a destination does not mean another will. Some stumble (continuously), some fall (unable to get up) and some like this man are blessed in finding his place. Everything is as it is so other things can be as they are. Our blessing is he has arrived in a place that can help all of us.
he surely did with atomic bomb and party at the night they dropped it
so fulfilling to watch this. the end is even more satiating to hear... nature's imagination is so much greater than man and she's never going to let us relax.
I hate this "millennial's way" of interrupting interview with stock images from other era.
@@PJPsounds age?
Run along to some other video.
Richard discovered himself through inner projection, The synchronicity of learning and bonding with the greater
Conscious comes to the ones that seek for all. A thinking universe!
He's always fun to hear. But I doubt it's only a question of "studying hard" to get to a certain level of understanding.
may be thats why he studied at strip clubs on and off lol