@@jonieljoestarzawarudo8172 I mean considering Golden Freddy can seemingly trap someone in limbo and prevent the Devil and Hell from claiming their soul, and other weird supernatural abilities that've popped up in the series more recently, I wouldn't say its off the table though there's room in the air to speculate if its the sort of time travel that lets those involved keep their memories. Honestly it might even mean that us dying in the games are technically canon but Cassidy or Dave, or both, just rewind the clock to ensure we survive for their ultimate end goal of getting Afton.
@@skybytebytes because otherwise the location would be a massive tomb with no air, no natural light, no ways to look outside or inside. Me personally, I always thought this pizzeria was just in the middle of another building, say a mall or something, so it made sense to have only one exit, no additional security guards, no windows and etc What IS interesting is the office having a hidden ventilation exit that can fit an animatronic
About the "it's me" meaning, I personally think that when the main 4 animatronics are saying it, they are referring to an adult or someone they think is Will. When Golden Freddy says it(or at least when BV/CC is in control), he's talking to his big bro Mike. Anyways, good video! Thank you for this breakdown of TWB and I really like your interpretation of the golden bear been able to mimc voices!
The Animatronics know Ralph is not the killer. They just want him to stay. And they do nothing if Ralph survives and quits in the normal ending. Golden Freddy also says It's me to Ralph
With the unwithereds. Since there was a Freddy suit with a head that the author felt the need to point out was a different model doesn’t that prove their existence. It just means it went Classic > Unwithered > Withered > Classic
24:38 I'm thinking what happened here is that he accidentally "summoned" little Dave, and Dave likely is just repeating what was done to him. The cycle of ghosts being stuck replicating their life is something that has come up before in other FNAF books (dont remember which ones) so its possible that the kid happens to be tied to GF and thus when reliving those events he winds up hurting anyone who is near. I dont buy the "shattered/split" soul stuff thats theorized about. Imo, theres not actually any concrete evidence for it-only evidence that ghosts who are disconnected from the knowledge they are dead dont fully grasp what theyre doing to people, as theyre just living out their lives in their perspective.
You could say the same for Goldenduo, Dave just sitting around in Golden Freddy having no effect on it makes him kinda irrelevant. Plus, it explains why his memories specifically are needed for the happiest day.
The theory that Golden Freddy is mimicking Brownwen's voice during a call makes sense because we've seen him do it before. In UCN, the vengeful spirit (presumably golden freddy) mimics the mediocre melodies to speak
25:31 could it also maybe be that just like the normal brown freddy, golden freddy is doing a "soul switch" kinda thing, but instead putting ralph into CC/Dave's perspective from when he was bitten?
12:50 I still feel like it wouldn’t make sense if Foxy was the one that caused the bite. Because Jeremy would’ve been by the party rooms at the time and it wouldn’t explain why the Toy animatronics were destroyed if it was the originals.
Also the older models only wake up at night and wouldn't get out during the day. Mangle would have the most motivation to commit the bite and have the jaws to do it. Plus if the character working the day shift was staying close to the kids, it would mean he got attacked instead of a kid
@AllArtworks not really as there's alot of process of elimination to say who did it. The toy animatronics don't have the jaw capacity to bite onto the frontal lobe. Chica using her beak to lodge it in his forehead isn't a bite but impaling him. The withered animatronics only wake up at night so they can't be considered. The puppet and balloon boy dint have moving mouths or moving teeth so it only leaves Mangle. They weren't fixed by adults and they enabled further destruction and their programming was altered to be more aggressive on adults. Any other character wouldn't line up with what we know and the location of where it happened.
I think its me might relate to shatter victim, since everyone says it and it seems to directly link back to "that old song" (The Secret Ingredient is You)
@@A59ri shatter victim is theory that BV's soul is broken and must be put back together. That he's a part of all the animatronics and that's why a happiest day must happen as a group, rather than just individually.
⚠️Warning⚠️ I’m just sharing my own personal opinions. I want to be honest, this book *at least* gave us answers and is a reliable book. Now I can finally say the Interactive Novels are 1987% Gameline. Thanks for making a breakdown analysis, and I’m actually glad that Phone Guy survived until Night 6 because of the juicy lore we got. With BV appearing with the animatronics, I think BV is a lost soul who ends up following his family, or rather stick with Shadow Freddy and later came across Cassidy inside of Golden Freddy and started working together as unit they started following Mike post-FNAF1. I’m kinda surprised that FNAF 1 doesn’t take place in 1993, but rather 1995 just like TSE. Tbh, I would love the Interactive Novels to dive deep into character development with the video games. As always, this video was definitely worth it 👍
i think the thing with bronwen, looking back, may just have been what she recorded before bonnie got her on night 3, just set to arrive on night 5. that said, even for a reporter, she knows too much. then again, given how ralph pulled “susie” out of thin air, maybe that’s how she got the information. a revelation moments before death.
Edit: This IS the best fnaf content of the 10 year anniversary!🎉 Everything you've discussed in this book felt creepy and downright sad at points! That bit with Chica really hit hard! It all feels like it was published in 2014!
About fnaf 1 location not being open until recently (1995), Ralph mentiones that he brought her when she was seven: "She's never gotten over the time you brought her to work to meet the animatronics when she was seven and they made her cry so hard, she threw up pizza and cake." 1983+7=1990, so fnaf 1 location had to be open earlier than 1995/1993/whatever.
@@sambar2772 I doubt she would be celebrating her birthday in a closed pizzeria. Like, it's 4 years until it opens, why would you bring your daughter here?? Idk honestly. He also says: "One of your employee perks is family discounts, but for some reason you've never brought Coppelia here. Not even on Bring Your Child to Work Day." So he directly contradicts himself. Seeing how Ralph seems to dissociate after his shifts and how he often forgets stuff, I think it's possible he has some form of dissociative amnesia. This could potentially explain some inconsistencies. Maybe he thinks some events are closer than they actually are. Like his daughter's birth and him starting to work at Freddy's. Then fnaf 1 is still in 1993 and it doesn't contradict hry223. But I guess it sounds like cope doesn't it?
Na I've noticed that too. He also dosen't remember when Freddy's opened. So maybe it's possible he has a memory problem. Or maybe it's a woppsie error in a fnaf book number #2442123
@@zenvariety9383 then the book retcons itself lol. Sambar mentions in the video that Ralph acts like Fnaf 1 Freddy's was opened recently, but then in the book Ralph also mentions how he brought his daughter to the restaurant when she was seven, so 5 years prior to the events of the week before, which means it was opened for at least five years by the time of TWB, which is NOT "recent". And then Ralph contradicts himself when he thinks about how he never brought his daughter to the restaurant.
It's important to keep in mind that Ralph's memory is unreliable, as he claims that he never took Coppelia to Freddy's at one point, then at another point in the novel reminisces on how he took her once when she was seven, causing her nightmares. I'm unsure if his claims about his daughter "just being born" is enough to warrant adjusting the timeline.
The point he claims never taking her to work/just being born can only be accessed by cheating, almost like they forgot to take the error page out, and hoped no-one selected that option and in-turn see their mistake.
10:03 I'll say it probably is around 1997 actually, on a fnaf 2 phone call, phone guy didn't remembered fredbear's name, so he prob started working with fazbear at the 1985 location
I think if they wanted Jeremy to recover they’d say there was a chance for it- but it’s made pretty clear that he’s a vegetable after the bite of 87. Miraculous recovery is a possibility, but very unlikely. As a story, to assume it’s the same guy and he somehow recovered from that 30 years later enough to be a VR technician and mechanic AND have a roughly 10-12 year old daughter is just nonsensical. 87 Jeremy doesn’t *need* to be more than he is, a victim.
So at 26:50 what you’re getting at is (these aren’t really numbers but) that Golden Freddy has like 40% of CC in him while the other 4 split the remaining 60% between them kinda
Perhaps it's CC who talked to Ralph. CC is perhaps the most innocent character in Fnaf so he wouldn't want any innocent deaths and perhaps only took Ralph to calm down the animatronics so that they wouldn't try to break out anymore
The place isn't recently opened that week, it's been around a while, but he's only just taken the night shift. It's said that the restaurant isn't new, it's not a grand reopening, but more that business has been dying down over the past few years. The case is that there were other people working the night shift before Ralph, he was just wrong when he said he'd take over the night shift in FNAF 2 Edit: "it's me" was NEVER exclusive to golden freddy or cc/bv/dave... In the first game, not only does foxy's sign change to "it's me", but the whole "it's me" hallucination literally has every single animatronic pop up and can/will trigger without golden freddy. Yes golden freddy triggers this same hallucination with all the other animatronics, but it isn't only triggered by him.
Yes it is Ralph mentions the reopening a lot. He mentions how the customers haven't been flocking to the restaurant just yet If you fail to screw Bonnie's head correctly, we hear that a news reporter came by the restaurant to see how it was doing since the reopening. Ralph wouldn't lie about taking the night shift. The story even states that after a temporary close (fnaf 2) management wanted him to take the night shift And yes the location is old because it's the same location from 1985
Ok so retrofit theory is true, took me a bit but I’m fine with it. But golden freddy definitely got redesigned somewhere before 1985 since his unwithered version is in into the pit, and withered golden freddy is a physical animatronic that you can tamper it’s ai. And if shadow Freddy is the agony from the mci, it took the form of a design similar to golden freddy.
Maybe Jeremy is still Cassie's dad, for me what phone guy said about the bite victim seemed less of a "he cant talk" and more of a "he doesnt want to talk", like "he doesnt talk to the media about it". Maybe because he doesnt want to because missing his frontal lobe messed up his memory, maybe this is why he cant really reember what the Bonnie mask is related to in HW2, but it just seems familiar.
So you’re saying that the Classic suits were redesigned but failed as they were ugly (going off of what Phoney said in F.N.A.F.2), so they were left in the back rooms, and then Faz Ent Inc went ahead with the Toy animatronics, and the retrofitted Classics, now Withereds, are used for parts for the Toy animatronics?
26:31 Just thinking about this right now… What if William taking apart the animatronics in the Follow Me minigames and potentially using their remnant for the funtimes was an attempt to “put him back together”? Maybe he was attempting to seperate the missing children’s remnant from CC? Just something that hit me while I was watching this video.
Theory time:so we know that this book is canon but the question now arises how canon is it you see I think this book is completely canon (including it existing in the fnaf world) and I think it was written by phone guy and by making it he went over all the ways he could have died but also was angry at how people treat him so he decided to fake his death in the book and say someone else wrote it and in reality it turned out that the animatronics did a bad job at putting him inside the suit so he was easily able to escape (this would also explain how he’s in fnaf 3)
Can I know where it's confirmed that Bonnie's spirit is named Jeremy? (Because I'm a huge fan of Bonnie and his spirit doesn't get NEARLY enough love from the creators-)
The Novel trilogy is not in the games. Stories from the other books some of them are in the continuity of the games some aren't. At least that is what I think
Scott has only said that the novel trilogy (TSE, TTO, TFC) were in a different continuity. He said that the Fazbear Frights books had stories that were “directly tied to the games” and that fans should use those books to “fill in the gaps of the past.” Scott technically hasn’t said anything about The Tales from the Pizzaplex, but that series was advertised as a follow up to Fazbear Frights. The Interactive Novels are canon-At least The Week Before is because it was advertised as being a prequel to FNAF 1; Scott’s co author also said he wrote the book in a way that wouldn’t contradict elements from the first game.
im closing doors and watching cams bc ım in fricking fnaf. im closing doors and watching cams bc ım in fricking fnaf. Ooooooooh my Daaaawg is that…frickin bear? Because ım a Purple Man Im a PURPLE MAN!
Idk but ralph says that he brought copellia to freddy's when she was 7 Fnaf 1 just opened in one single year Then fnaf 1 has to take place around 1988-1989
@@Teoriak It's a problem because the 4 mci on the tombstones all have names except the 5th grave which is covered by grass and in the survival logbook cassidy wrote "my name" on a red tombstone.
YOOO DOES THIS CONFIRM THAT CRYING CHILD IS TOYSNAK??? I mean, think about it. Happiest day only covers the main 6 victims, while CC was nowhere to be seen. Wouldn’t it be fitting if the forgotten victim was also the most angry? Maybe he holds some sort of grudge against not only Afton, but also the other spirits, hence he’s trapped them all in the UCN purgatory.
The shadowy figure in FNAF World says they’ll put you back together, just like what CC was told before his death. So we can assume that perhaps the player in FNAF World could be a stand-in of sorts for CC. ALSO in UCN, when you go to Old Man Consequences’ pond, he tells the player Freddy (CC), to leave "the demon to his demons" (Demons can refer to inner conflicts, and problems. The demon is Afton, and his demons could refer to the other vengeful souls trapped there, also tormenting William.) If CC "leaves the demon to his demons", and finds inner peace, it’s only then that all the souls can finally rest.
Anyways we also know that FNAF World and UCN are connected, due to all the references, and the fact that If you get the OMC ending in UCN, you’ll get the trophy in FNAF World. Soooo yeah
It dosen't say outright. But Ralph mentions the reopening a lot. And if you fail to screw Bonnie's head correctly, we hear that a news reporter came by the restaurant to see how it was doing since the reopening. And Ralph in fnaf 2 says that when the place opens again, he'll take the nightshift. So the story most likely happens close to the reopening
IM RIGHT I KNEW THAT FNAF 1 ANIMATRONICS WHERE BEFORE FNAF 2. I STARTED TO THINK THAT THE UNWITHEREDS WERE REAL AND MCI WERE THE UNWITHEREDS AND FNAF 1 ANIMATRONICS WERE 1990,1993 AND 1995.
Man I used to love fnaf. I think there are so many convoluted additions and conflicting details, retcons, and literally multiple continuities between the books and games - it's not even satisfying or enjoyable anymore. It's just confusing and non tangible.
its stupid that scott made the withereds and then decided to go 'mmm nah the fnaf 1 characters are what they looked like in 1985' instead of unwithereds
"Uh... hello, hello! Uh, see, I told you your first night wouldn't be a problem. You're a natural! Uh, by now I'm sure you've noticed the older models sitting in the back room. Uh, those are from the previous location, and we just use them for parts now. The idea at first was to repair them... uh, they even *started retrofitting them* with some of the newer technology, but they were just so ugly, you know?” -Ralph (FNAF 2/Night 2)
If the information in the book is anything to go by, it's actually open in 1989; page 44 (the one that mentions Copellia being born) has a massive error on it, and can only be accessed by cheating. Also, 1993 was a conclusion reached by comparing FNaF 1 to a mass murder that occurred in said year.
10:56 Parts & Service was always behind the stage in FNaF 1. It's the Backstage that's to the left side. 15:09 Me when I don't know FNaF lore and that the Crying Child was split into each animatronic, hence them all repeating *his* phrase: 22:47 Because the Crying Child only speaks through edited text or voices. This is an example of an edited voice. 25:25 What, you just contradicted yourself. 😭 (But at least you remembered him fragmenting into pieces)
Backstage and parts and service are the same thing. They are used interchangeably throughout the book. Why would Crying Child use It's me on Ralph. And the only time we saw CC speak is through altered text. We never heard him speak.
@@sambar2772 "Backstage and parts and service are the same thing." Not in Security Breach. Why would it be any different here? Same with FNaF 2, Parts & Service is not the Backstage room. "Why would Crying Child use It's me on Ralph." I'm not really sure what you mean by that. It's Me isn't a phrase said exclusively to Mike. Crying Child says "It's Me" over and over to Cassidy in the Logbook. "And the only time we saw CC speak is through altered text. We never heard him speak." Yeah, he only uses altered text and dialogue to speak. Though, it's not impossible for the dialogue to be Cassidy, as we see her do the same in UCN with the Melodies.
Honestly I'm just glad we finally got a canon name for Phone Guy after 10 years. That and he really was a good guy.
yes and the cryiing childs real name is daved Cassady
@@brightlights2489 No. His name is David. Cassidy is a separate child.
Find it funny that technically, Phone Guy canonically dying requires him to have somehow committed new game plus.
So, does that mean Golden Freddy can send people back in time?
@@jonieljoestarzawarudo8172 I mean considering Golden Freddy can seemingly trap someone in limbo and prevent the Devil and Hell from claiming their soul, and other weird supernatural abilities that've popped up in the series more recently, I wouldn't say its off the table though there's room in the air to speculate if its the sort of time travel that lets those involved keep their memories.
Honestly it might even mean that us dying in the games are technically canon but Cassidy or Dave, or both, just rewind the clock to ensure we survive for their ultimate end goal of getting Afton.
The most important thing about this to me is the building having actual windows
How is that important
@@skybytebytes because otherwise the location would be a massive tomb with no air, no natural light, no ways to look outside or inside. Me personally, I always thought this pizzeria was just in the middle of another building, say a mall or something, so it made sense to have only one exit, no additional security guards, no windows and etc
What IS interesting is the office having a hidden ventilation exit that can fit an animatronic
@@NiCoNiCoNiColatbh into the pit is how I always imagined Freddy’s to look
@@NiCoNiCoNiCola its only 1 window and crying child name is daved we learn recently
About the "it's me" meaning, I personally think that when the main 4 animatronics are saying it, they are referring to an adult or someone they think is Will. When Golden Freddy says it(or at least when BV/CC is in control), he's talking to his big bro Mike.
Anyways, good video! Thank you for this breakdown of TWB and I really like your interpretation of the golden bear been able to mimc voices!
The Animatronics know Ralph is not the killer.
They just want him to stay.
And they do nothing if Ralph survives and quits in the normal ending.
Golden Freddy also says It's me to Ralph
I think it's just the spirits trying to make it clear they are there
@@sambar2772 Welp, there goes my interpretation of trying to make sense out of all of this.
@@Lumberjack_king Yeah, could also be that.
THE WEEK BEFORE WAS PEAK
I haven’t seen enough theory vids on it so yours is the first I’m watching
the peak before
With the unwithereds. Since there was a Freddy suit with a head that the author felt the need to point out was a different model doesn’t that prove their existence. It just means it went
Classic > Unwithered > Withered > Classic
The freddy heads thing is because the backstage camera in fnaf 1 has early versions of freddy's head
Classic
24:38
I'm thinking what happened here is that he accidentally "summoned" little Dave, and Dave likely is just repeating what was done to him. The cycle of ghosts being stuck replicating their life is something that has come up before in other FNAF books (dont remember which ones) so its possible that the kid happens to be tied to GF and thus when reliving those events he winds up hurting anyone who is near.
I dont buy the "shattered/split" soul stuff thats theorized about. Imo, theres not actually any concrete evidence for it-only evidence that ghosts who are disconnected from the knowledge they are dead dont fully grasp what theyre doing to people, as theyre just living out their lives in their perspective.
You could say the same for Goldenduo, Dave just sitting around in Golden Freddy having no effect on it makes him kinda irrelevant. Plus, it explains why his memories specifically are needed for the happiest day.
The theory that Golden Freddy is mimicking Brownwen's voice during a call makes sense because we've seen him do it before. In UCN, the vengeful spirit (presumably golden freddy) mimics the mediocre melodies to speak
25:31 could it also maybe be that just like the normal brown freddy, golden freddy is doing a "soul switch" kinda thing, but instead putting ralph into CC/Dave's perspective from when he was bitten?
12:50 I still feel like it wouldn’t make sense if Foxy was the one that caused the bite. Because Jeremy would’ve been by the party rooms at the time and it wouldn’t explain why the Toy animatronics were destroyed if it was the originals.
If mangle did it that might relate to ralph saying foxy never bit a kid since mangle is a version of foxy
@@honeyybutter you could be right but I still feel like it’s still up in the air of who caused the bite
Also the older models only wake up at night and wouldn't get out during the day. Mangle would have the most motivation to commit the bite and have the jaws to do it. Plus if the character working the day shift was staying close to the kids, it would mean he got attacked instead of a kid
@AllArtworks not really as there's alot of process of elimination to say who did it. The toy animatronics don't have the jaw capacity to bite onto the frontal lobe. Chica using her beak to lodge it in his forehead isn't a bite but impaling him. The withered animatronics only wake up at night so they can't be considered. The puppet and balloon boy dint have moving mouths or moving teeth so it only leaves Mangle. They weren't fixed by adults and they enabled further destruction and their programming was altered to be more aggressive on adults. Any other character wouldn't line up with what we know and the location of where it happened.
I think its me might relate to shatter victim, since everyone says it and it seems to directly link back to "that old song" (The Secret Ingredient is You)
whats the shatter
@@A59ri shatter victim is theory that BV's soul is broken and must be put back together. That he's a part of all the animatronics and that's why a happiest day must happen as a group, rather than just individually.
Plus after he bears the recording of the bite of 83 he gets crushed by an aninatronic that teleport to him
⚠️Warning⚠️ I’m just sharing my own personal opinions.
I want to be honest, this book *at least* gave us answers and is a reliable book. Now I can finally say the Interactive Novels are 1987% Gameline.
Thanks for making a breakdown analysis, and I’m actually glad that Phone Guy survived until Night 6 because of the juicy lore we got.
With BV appearing with the animatronics, I think BV is a lost soul who ends up following his family, or rather stick with Shadow Freddy and later came across Cassidy inside of Golden Freddy and started working together as unit they started following Mike post-FNAF1. I’m kinda surprised that FNAF 1 doesn’t take place in 1993, but rather 1995 just like TSE.
Tbh, I would love the Interactive Novels to dive deep into character development with the video games.
As always, this video was definitely worth it 👍
@@bagos11 I know that. But I put that there in case someone else would pull a counter argument on me
i think the thing with bronwen, looking back, may just have been what she recorded before bonnie got her on night 3, just set to arrive on night 5. that said, even for a reporter, she knows too much. then again, given how ralph pulled “susie” out of thin air, maybe that’s how she got the information. a revelation moments before death.
Edit:
This IS the best fnaf content of the 10 year anniversary!🎉
Everything you've discussed in this book felt creepy and downright sad at points!
That bit with Chica really hit hard! It all feels like it was published in 2014!
On Night 3, you can find Freddy acting weird if you hide under the table. He'll crash into the tables and limp. I think that is Bronwin
About fnaf 1 location not being open until recently (1995), Ralph mentiones that he brought her when she was seven:
"She's never gotten over the time you brought her to work to meet the animatronics when she was seven and they made her cry so hard, she threw up pizza and cake."
1983+7=1990, so fnaf 1 location had to be open earlier than 1995/1993/whatever.
Maybe he brought her when the place wasn't open
@@sambar2772 I doubt she would be celebrating her birthday in a closed pizzeria. Like, it's 4 years until it opens, why would you bring your daughter here?? Idk honestly. He also says:
"One of your employee perks is family discounts, but for some reason you've never brought Coppelia here. Not even on Bring Your Child to Work Day."
So he directly contradicts himself. Seeing how Ralph seems to dissociate after his shifts and how he often forgets stuff, I think it's possible he has some form of dissociative amnesia. This could potentially explain some inconsistencies. Maybe he thinks some events are closer than they actually are. Like his daughter's birth and him starting to work at Freddy's. Then fnaf 1 is still in 1993 and it doesn't contradict hry223. But I guess it sounds like cope doesn't it?
Na I've noticed that too.
He also dosen't remember when Freddy's opened.
So maybe it's possible he has a memory problem.
Or maybe it's a woppsie error in a fnaf book number #2442123
Could also be a retcon.
@@zenvariety9383 then the book retcons itself lol. Sambar mentions in the video that Ralph acts like Fnaf 1 Freddy's was opened recently, but then in the book Ralph also mentions how he brought his daughter to the restaurant when she was seven, so 5 years prior to the events of the week before, which means it was opened for at least five years by the time of TWB, which is NOT "recent". And then Ralph contradicts himself when he thinks about how he never brought his daughter to the restaurant.
9:17
In the call he asks if the next night guard could check the back inside the suits. Because he was always curious which may have saved his life.
It's important to keep in mind that Ralph's memory is unreliable, as he claims that he never took Coppelia to Freddy's at one point, then at another point in the novel reminisces on how he took her once when she was seven, causing her nightmares. I'm unsure if his claims about his daughter "just being born" is enough to warrant adjusting the timeline.
The point he claims never taking her to work/just being born can only be accessed by cheating, almost like they forgot to take the error page out, and hoped no-one selected that option and in-turn see their mistake.
10:03 I'll say it probably is around 1997 actually, on a fnaf 2 phone call, phone guy didn't remembered fredbear's name, so he prob started working with fazbear at the 1985 location
14:28 OBJECTION! Who’s to say he never recovered at all? Or if it wasn’t Jeremy who was bit for some reason? Just wanted to say those things
I think if they wanted Jeremy to recover they’d say there was a chance for it- but it’s made pretty clear that he’s a vegetable after the bite of 87. Miraculous recovery is a possibility, but very unlikely. As a story, to assume it’s the same guy and he somehow recovered from that 30 years later enough to be a VR technician and mechanic AND have a roughly 10-12 year old daughter is just nonsensical. 87 Jeremy doesn’t *need* to be more than he is, a victim.
So at 26:50 what you’re getting at is (these aren’t really numbers but) that Golden Freddy has like 40% of CC in him while the other 4 split the remaining 60% between them kinda
Perhaps it's CC who talked to Ralph. CC is perhaps the most innocent character in Fnaf so he wouldn't want any innocent deaths and perhaps only took Ralph to calm down the animatronics so that they wouldn't try to break out anymore
The place isn't recently opened that week, it's been around a while, but he's only just taken the night shift. It's said that the restaurant isn't new, it's not a grand reopening, but more that business has been dying down over the past few years. The case is that there were other people working the night shift before Ralph, he was just wrong when he said he'd take over the night shift in FNAF 2
Edit: "it's me" was NEVER exclusive to golden freddy or cc/bv/dave... In the first game, not only does foxy's sign change to "it's me", but the whole "it's me" hallucination literally has every single animatronic pop up and can/will trigger without golden freddy. Yes golden freddy triggers this same hallucination with all the other animatronics, but it isn't only triggered by him.
Yes it is
Ralph mentions the reopening a lot.
He mentions how the customers haven't been flocking to the restaurant just yet
If you fail to screw Bonnie's head correctly, we hear that a news reporter came by the restaurant to see how it was doing since the reopening.
Ralph wouldn't lie about taking the night shift.
The story even states that after a temporary close (fnaf 2) management wanted him to take the night shift
And yes the location is old because it's the same location from 1985
Ok so retrofit theory is true, took me a bit but I’m fine with it. But golden freddy definitely got redesigned somewhere before 1985 since his unwithered version is in into the pit, and withered golden freddy is a physical animatronic that you can tamper it’s ai. And if shadow Freddy is the agony from the mci, it took the form of a design similar to golden freddy.
The week before confirming 2 theorys and proving that one is a lie it's fire(3 theorys actually)
Golden freddy would not want the others to leave because that would make even more dificult fot it to get revenge on afton
Maybe Jeremy is still Cassie's dad, for me what phone guy said about the bite victim seemed less of a "he cant talk" and more of a "he doesnt want to talk", like "he doesnt talk to the media about it". Maybe because he doesnt want to because missing his frontal lobe messed up his memory, maybe this is why he cant really reember what the Bonnie mask is related to in HW2, but it just seems familiar.
i think the "it's me" phrase is what connects all the animatronics with the crying child
11:59 tbf, they could still exists. As failed retrofitted suits in 87
And movie might actually use Retrofitted theory
So you’re saying that the Classic suits were redesigned but failed as they were ugly (going off of what Phoney said in F.N.A.F.2), so they were left in the back rooms, and then Faz Ent Inc went ahead with the Toy animatronics, and the retrofitted Classics, now Withereds, are used for parts for the Toy animatronics?
@@azimuddin1890 That could maybe be the case, It might not (I think them finding the mci bodies is also part of why they are scrapped)
26:31 Just thinking about this right now… What if William taking apart the animatronics in the Follow Me minigames and potentially using their remnant for the funtimes was an attempt to “put him back together”? Maybe he was attempting to seperate the missing children’s remnant from CC? Just something that hit me while I was watching this video.
time traveling phone calls..
Ofc Phone Guy is in Into the Pit so it's real XDD
Return to the pit confirmed that cassidy is kelsey lol
I have to say, i hate how they are not able to draw the designs of the first game correctly.
the over view of the story that you did reminds me of the movie.
Theory time:so we know that this book is canon but the question now arises how canon is it you see I think this book is completely canon (including it existing in the fnaf world) and I think it was written by phone guy and by making it he went over all the ways he could have died but also was angry at how people treat him so he decided to fake his death in the book and say someone else wrote it and in reality it turned out that the animatronics did a bad job at putting him inside the suit so he was easily able to escape (this would also explain how he’s in fnaf 3)
(19:08) What? That’s the Feral Plastic, he got nerfed in the book?
If they say there are old version of the cour four from Freadbear, is possible that maybe that are the suits on the withereds
The implication is that Bronwen is absorbed inside of Golden Freddy.
19:11 CARL!!!! NOOOOO!!!! Also funny how the Animatronics have personalities like the Glamrocks 🤣 and I love how it’s canon
They always did.
But it was always subtle.
The cupcake thing reinforce again with the movie that the dog william kills could haunt the puppet
This does not debunk Cassie's dad...
Can I know where it's confirmed that Bonnie's spirit is named Jeremy? (Because I'm a huge fan of Bonnie and his spirit doesn't get NEARLY enough love from the creators-)
I think is from the Graves estear egg. Most of the names comes from there
I think there was a misunderstanding. I meant in The Week Before, not FNAF 6
Bronwen in her final message says this
"Jeremy got me. I mean, bonnie"
I think bronwen is the mother or sister of Jeremy the MCI kid that possesses Bonnie
The chica birthday song bit is pretty sad
25:42 which is the opposite of the current interpretation
I really this interpretation. I really hope that someday it gets revealed that crying child is the vengeful spirit
Wait i thought the books werent canon to the games? Or does that only apply to some books
The Novel trilogy is not in the games.
Stories from the other books some of them are in the continuity of the games some aren't.
At least that is what I think
Scott has only said that the novel trilogy (TSE, TTO, TFC) were in a different continuity.
He said that the Fazbear Frights books had stories that were “directly tied to the games” and that fans should use those books to “fill in the gaps of the past.”
Scott technically hasn’t said anything about The Tales from the Pizzaplex, but that series was advertised as a follow up to Fazbear Frights.
The Interactive Novels are canon-At least The Week Before is because it was advertised as being a prequel to FNAF 1; Scott’s co author also said he wrote the book in a way that wouldn’t contradict elements from the first game.
im closing doors and watching cams
bc ım in fricking fnaf.
im closing doors and watching cams
bc ım in fricking fnaf.
Ooooooooh my Daaaawg
is that…frickin bear?
Because ım a Purple Man
Im a PURPLE MAN!
Idk but ralph says that he brought copellia to freddy's when she was 7
Fnaf 1 just opened in one single year
Then fnaf 1 has to take place around 1988-1989
Does this guy not know that FNaF 3 has a different phone guy that’s like 30 years later , phone guy would probably be in his 60s or something
It's really 2 weeks if you think about it
what indicates that someone other than c.c is in golden freddy?
5th missing kid
Two souls in the logbook
@@sambar2772 5 the victim could be andrew and the person in the diary could be either charlie or wiliam
@@Teoriak 5 the victim is cassidy not andrew.
@@Steve-12348 this is just a theory there is no problem with andrew being the 5th victim
@@Teoriak It's a problem because the 4 mci on the tombstones all have names except the 5th grave which is covered by grass and in the survival logbook cassidy wrote "my name" on a red tombstone.
YOOO DOES THIS CONFIRM THAT CRYING CHILD IS TOYSNAK??? I mean, think about it. Happiest day only covers the main 6 victims, while CC was nowhere to be seen. Wouldn’t it be fitting if the forgotten victim was also the most angry? Maybe he holds some sort of grudge against not only Afton, but also the other spirits, hence he’s trapped them all in the UCN purgatory.
The shadowy figure in FNAF World says they’ll put you back together, just like what CC was told before his death. So we can assume that perhaps the player in FNAF World could be a stand-in of sorts for CC. ALSO in UCN, when you go to Old Man Consequences’ pond, he tells the player Freddy (CC), to leave "the demon to his demons" (Demons can refer to inner conflicts, and problems. The demon is Afton, and his demons could refer to the other vengeful souls trapped there, also tormenting William.) If CC "leaves the demon to his demons", and finds inner peace, it’s only then that all the souls can finally rest.
Anyways we also know that FNAF World and UCN are connected, due to all the references, and the fact that If you get the OMC ending in UCN, you’ll get the trophy in FNAF World. Soooo yeah
William didn't kill Crying Child
@@sambar2772 I mean true ig, but like you could still argue that it was his fault for building a robot with the ability to crack a kid’s skull open
@@Made_In_Mayhembuddy Henry made fredbear and Mike is the one who killed him not William
Hi. Could you please provide a quote from the book where it states that the location was only opened recently? I can't find it and I kinda need it.
It dosen't say outright.
But Ralph mentions the reopening a lot.
And if you fail to screw Bonnie's head correctly, we hear that a news reporter came by the restaurant to see how it was doing since the reopening.
And Ralph in fnaf 2 says that when the place opens again, he'll take the nightshift.
So the story most likely happens close to the reopening
If he was still alive
I guess that Gabriel(Freddy) is a bully
So if 90’s FFP wasn’t a failure then why did it close? Did it gain less popularity day after day?
ALSO do you have a quote of Freddy’s being recently opened?
IM RIGHT I KNEW THAT FNAF 1 ANIMATRONICS WHERE BEFORE FNAF 2. I STARTED TO THINK THAT THE UNWITHEREDS WERE REAL AND MCI WERE THE UNWITHEREDS AND FNAF 1 ANIMATRONICS WERE 1990,1993 AND 1995.
how many endings does the book have
50
But most of them are game overs
Man I used to love fnaf. I think there are so many convoluted additions and conflicting details, retcons, and literally multiple continuities between the books and games - it's not even satisfying or enjoyable anymore. It's just confusing and non tangible.
So fnaf 3 and ffps are in 2025 now?
No, Fnaf 3 is in 2015
@@arpaddudas9292 personally, I believe that fnaf 3 is 30 years after fnaf 1, but I do think fnaf32015 is possible.
FNAF3 takes place in 2023. It was released in March 2015.
@@Greddy420 that's what I believe, but the week before seems to suggest that fnaf 1 is in 1995, so idk, I'm confused
@@ennard1789It seems that Mike
did the FNaF 1 shifts in 1992 and William got springlocked in 1995.
its stupid that scott made the withereds and then decided to go 'mmm nah the fnaf 1 characters are what they looked like in 1985' instead of unwithereds
just adds more to the confusion of the fnaf lore
He can say what he wants, but at the end of the day that's just not what happened
Frankly it's just an excuse do not go back to modeling, or not wanting to fuk up their models
@@ClaytonTheCrackerBut it is what happened because it’s his story.
"Uh... hello, hello! Uh, see, I told you your first night wouldn't be a problem. You're a natural!
Uh, by now I'm sure you've noticed the older models sitting in the back room. Uh, those are from the previous location, and we just use them for parts now. The idea at first was to repair them... uh, they even *started retrofitting them* with some of the newer technology, but they were just so ugly, you know?”
-Ralph (FNAF 2/Night 2)
I thought it was opened in 1993
If the information in the book is anything to go by, it's actually open in 1989; page 44 (the one that mentions Copellia being born) has a massive error on it, and can only be accessed by cheating. Also, 1993 was a conclusion reached by comparing FNaF 1 to a mass murder that occurred in said year.
10:56 Parts & Service was always behind the stage in FNaF 1.
It's the Backstage that's to the left side.
15:09 Me when I don't know FNaF lore and that the Crying Child was split into each animatronic, hence them all repeating *his* phrase:
22:47 Because the Crying Child only speaks through edited text or voices. This is an example of an edited voice.
25:25 What, you just contradicted yourself. 😭
(But at least you remembered him fragmenting into pieces)
Backstage and parts and service are the same thing.
They are used interchangeably throughout the book.
Why would Crying Child use It's me on Ralph.
And the only time we saw CC speak is through altered text. We never heard him speak.
@@sambar2772 "Backstage and parts and service are the same thing."
Not in Security Breach. Why would it be any different here?
Same with FNaF 2, Parts & Service is not the Backstage room.
"Why would Crying Child use It's me on Ralph."
I'm not really sure what you mean by that. It's Me isn't a phrase said exclusively to Mike. Crying Child says "It's Me" over and over to Cassidy in the Logbook.
"And the only time we saw CC speak is through altered text. We never heard him speak."
Yeah, he only uses altered text and dialogue to speak. Though, it's not impossible for the dialogue to be Cassidy, as we see her do the same in UCN with the Melodies.
Why did Freddy bite mr cupcake :((
He had it coming
The mimic is golden freddy
Because he dies
wrong crying child name is Daveed Cassady