VSC can not get rated, unless rob wants to rate one of the hardest levels in the game as 2 stars (Beating a rated level over 2 stars in under 30 seconds activates the anti-cheat)
idk if this is a hot take but im like 100000000% confident vsc will never be rated. Even if it was, robtop would probably unrate after seeing all the nazi shit in the level
totally agree. 1. levels under 30 seconds have almost never been rated and i think it's pretty clear robtop isnt going to rate them 2. VSC's deco is way below standard 3. the racist stuff
If the word next to the clock is "medium," "long," or "xl," it can be rated. If the word next to the clock is "tiny," or "short," it won't be rated-that's how it's always been. XMas Challenge
tiny or short levels CAN be rated, but as someone else said, if a level is above 2 stars and it is beaten in shorted than medium time, it triggers the anti cheat
@@yuibatheres 2. If you hit a move trigger at the end, text appears in another language translating to "the jews are not human". Also, if you wait at the endscreen for about an hour, "NI" and "ER" appears around the "GG" forming... that word...
@@vscviktor hes just stating a fact. Robtop still probably wont rate it, remember what happened with requiem? just a middle finger and it got beamed by rob
Its kinda funny that everyone is just now catching on that bo is a complete edgelord, like if you're in a call with him it's pretty obvious i thought everyone knew already.
I kind of understand how this is important but we already have a rated 31 second 2.1 level that has existed for like 3+ years in Speequ which is also a demon
I do think the absolute limit for length should be medium or 30 seconds. Cobwebs still feels like a full level despite being that short. I also think that the standards should get higher and higher the shorter the level is, so a level like cobwebs is only able to get rated because of just how good it looks (subjective ofc, though I would say the amount of detail is pretty objective, whether its good or not is something else)
Cobwebs got rated because its technically SLIGHTLY over 30 seconds, meaning the gd servers recongnise it as a medium level. Something like VSC cant be rated because and tiny or short level cant be rated above 2 stars (rob has an anti cheat that makes it so any level above 2 stars thats beaten in less than 30 seconds is marked as cheated and will kick you out)
8:12 This is 100% the case. Robtop has been rating a lot of old levels recently, more than usual at least, so I think he is just getting around to rating some older levels that he failed to see the first time due to there being an influx of rates. Robtop is out of touch with the community in some aspects so this is probably the cause of a delayed cobwebs rate unfortunately :/
Are we just gonna pretend that tower descent doesnt exist? It got rated at 25 seconds, unrated and then rerated after a 5 second endscreen extension was added, meaning its 30 seconds long. Its a hard demon btw.
6:12 challenge levels are required to be under 30 seconds, and the shortest possible length for a rated level is 30 seconds, so challenge levels will probably not get rated.
There have been numerous demons around the 30 second range that have been rated, most notably tower descent which was released over a year ago. Wish more research was done in that regard
I'm asking myself If he didn't just fixed the weird bug with medium length difficulty level that RobTop was talking about long ago ? And now he is just starting to rate good looking Medium length levels
Reasons why VSC or Challenge Levels wont get rated - Most challenge levels are below 30 seconds long - a level that has a length of "tiny" and "short" will automatically get rated Easy (2*) due to RobTop's terrible anticheat - some Challenge Levels are quite literally layouts - VSC has some triggers that activate some uhmm, yeah stuff I don't wanna talk about I'd love to see some CL levels rated if it were to be possible. I really like Apotheosis for example. If a person who made a Challenge wants their level rated tho, they can simply extend the endscreen to match the 30 second length (APTeam ahhh method) this also worked when pocke released "Tower Descent" (Hard Demon)
i never understood why cobwebs wasnt rated when robtop rated unknown which is almost the same length. but i was suprised icobwebs got rated 2 years later
the demonlist server has a channel called pending list changes which shows, well, pending list changes as well as if it will place on the main list extended list or too close to call. on there it says cobwebs will place extended list. global demonlist also has cobwebs placed at 132 however this will likely be very different on pointercrate bc of extra unrated levels being on global and a difference in accuracy of the placements between the two
Looking at the opinions of victors it's probably around top 120 on pointercrate. Highest placement I saw was around neutra (71) and lowest was knights of thunder (legacy / 160), most were in the range of 100-140.
If i remember right (probably not cause my memory is ass) i swear cobwebs was rated for a bit of time a few years ago. idk why it got unrated, probably drama, but i swear i tried playing the newly rated hard extreme demon on my shitty laptop a bit ago. also i remember there is an evw video about cobwebs (its a level request video) where he sent cobwebs. also it should a million percent be rated imo, the deco is fire and still holds up well to this day.
The "minimum" length for a rated level over 2 stars has always been 30 seconds. There's even been a lot of notable levels in the 30-60 second range that've been rated since 2.0 such as CITRA (37 seconds), kowareta (49 seconds) and tower descent (30 seconds). Cobwebs likely wasn't rated because RobTop hadn't gotten around to it. Also there are no rated levels shorter than 30 seconds that aren't Auto or 2 stars. If you search in-game for Tiny / Short levels some higher than 2 stars will appear but they only show as Tiny / Short due to a bug and are actually longer than that.
This is honestly a shock to me. I saw this level and thought it was very cool but couldn't gain recognition due to the lack of a rate. I'm kinda glad it's rated now
Ive always felt that if a level is at least medium (which cobwebs is) it should have a chance to be rated. Like the lengths are in the game for a reason, why dont we use them to help set what can be rated. I do think that Medium levels should have slightly higher rate standards, but still not much higher.
I know, I know I've let you down I've been a fool to myself I thought that I could live for no one else But now, through all the hurt and pain It's time for me to respect The ones you love mean more than anything So, with sadness in my heart Feel the best thing I could do Is end it all and leave forever What's done is done, it feels so bad What once was happy now is sad I'll never love again My world is ending I wish that I could turn back time 'Cause now the guilt is all mine Can't live without the trust from those you love I know we can't forget the past You can't forget love and pride Because of that, it's killing me inside It all returns to nothing It all comes tumbling down Tumbling down, tumbling down It all returns to nothing I just keep letting me down Letting me down, letting me down In my heart of hearts I know that I could never love again I've lost everything, everything Everything that matters to me matters in this world I wish that I could turn back time 'Cause now the guilt is all mine Can't live without the trust from those you love I know we can't forget the past You can't forget love and pride Because of that, it's killing me inside It all returns to nothing It just keeps tumbling down Tumbling down, tumbling down It all returns to nothing I just keep letting me down Letting me down, letting me down It all returns to nothing It just keeps tumbling down Tumbling down, tumbling down It all returns to nothing I just keep letting me down Letting me down, letting me down Ah, ah, ah, ah Tumbling down Tumbling down Tumbling down Ah, ah, ah, ah Letting me down Letting me down Letting me down Ah, ah, ah, ah Tumbling down Tumbling down Tumbling down Ah, ah, ah, ah Letting me down Letting me down Letting me down Gomtree dask
People don't realise that the minimum length for a level is 30 seconds at least to get rated. Anything below 30 seconds is not rateable and I believe that robtop simply had no clue what cobwebs was and discovered it recently so he decided, well it's rate worthy so why not.
vsc is short length, therefore restricting it from getting rated higher than 2 stars. also cobwebs is a medium length level, just like tower descent, while they are both 30 seconds long
This will forever be the shortest Demon. The only reason its rated is because of the 2 second end screen which makes it a (Medium) Length and not short.
Vsc is a bit of a stretch, rob literally can’t rate levels above 2 stars that are less than 30 seconds because it detects the player as a hacker, the same problem happened with Xmas adventurer, it was like easy demon and yet it got 2 stars. So unless robtop changes the anti-cheat, vsc can’t get rated. Also, some levels need to be rated, like aquamarine, Ashley wave trials, based after based, apocalyptic trilogy, and old levels like element 11 rg, theory of darkness, and stereo demoness unerfed
Imma be honest, if i was Rob, first of all i would say why i rated a level this short. About top level recognition, i think it would be funny to add a separate rate system for these kind of levels, like he already made legendary and mythic ratings for the best and most unique levels to give them a kind of aproval that the level is one of the best, so giving a special rate for the hardest levels in the game would make sense if he did it, due to the community's love and support for the verifiers and the levels.
You think a lot of people would end up jumping to this even though the gameplay is quite hard even if just 30 seconds? I’m jumping to it rn from xo so you might be right lol.
Or mayby it will be easier to have some shorter videos on tiktok or youtube shorts. That's easy advertisement for robtop and the newer tiktok / youtube short creators? Mayby I'm just kidding? I hope it.
1:18 do you still dont know what global demonlist is? Cobwebs placement was there all 2+ years after verification so go just check position, check other levels that are close to it and look at position of these levels in pointercrate, it THAT simple
@optm9160 still can't understand how people blame demonlist for inaccurate positions. I mean if your opinion is not the same as other opinions that's fine, but why you are blaming demonlist for that? Blame people, that have these opinions then🤦♂️
@@Ivan_Mihailick I said the list is inaccurate because it is I’m not blaming the list because there is no way to have a accurate list but the global list is more inaccurate the pointercrate
In my opinion cobwebs is easier then bloodlust, its so short its just like luck based. (“But Ascende4d, Geometry dadh is pure skill”) I agree but amagin you have a 10% chance to pass the first wave in cataclysm. Then after the first wave you have a 50% chance to get to the ship at 45%. The odds are taken to the power and are not multiplied. Meaning getting to 45% in cataclysm is like 5% chance. Another example is lets say you have a 99% chance of beating sterio madness. Well do 10 attempts and take 99% to the power of like 10, (in which 10 represents the amount if attempts you do) and the odds of you beating the level 10 times in a row is 90%. Now amagin your doing runs on bloodlust. Since it has more parts and is longer, you have a lower chance of beating it then cobwebs. Cobwebs is harder. Even if the odds of you getting passed the first section is alot lower chance then getting passed the first section in bloodlust, if you multiply each percentage together, the overall percentage of you beating bloodlust is lower then if you were to do cobwebs. It has a harder mental copasity because each attempt is so long. Compared to cobwebs which is so short. Here is an Example to better explain it because I suck at explaining. Ah, I see what you mean now! You're asking about the probability of beating the level 10 times in a row, given a 99% chance of success per attempt. Calculation: Since the probability of success for each attempt is independent, the probability of succeeding 10 times in a row is the product of the success probabilities for each attempt: P ( 10 successes in a row ) = 0.9 9 10 P(10 successes in a row)=0.99 10 Step-by-Step: P ( 10 successes in a row ) = 0.99 × 0.99 × 0.99 × … (10 times) = 0.9 9 10 P(10 successes in a row)=0.99×0.99×0.99×…(10 times)=0.99 10 Result: P ( 10 successes in a row ) = 0.904382 ≈ 90.44 % P(10 successes in a row)=0.904382≈90.44% Interpretation: You have about a 90.44% chance of successfully beating the level 10 times in a row without dying. You said: What if the success rate was only 90% ChatGPT said: ChatGPT If the success rate is 90% per attempt, the probability of beating the level 10 times in a row is calculated similarly: P ( 10 successes in a row ) = 0.9 0 10 P(10 successes in a row)=0.90 10 Step-by-Step: P ( 10 successes in a row ) = 0.90 × 0.90 × 0.90 × … (10 times) = 0.9 0 10 P(10 successes in a row)=0.90×0.90×0.90×…(10 times)=0.90 10 Result: P ( 10 successes in a row ) = 0.348678 ≈ 34.87 % P(10 successes in a row)=0.348678≈34.87% Interpretation: With a 90% success rate per attempt, the chance of beating the level 10 times in a row is about 34.87%. You said: take that information that I gave you and lets say that a level in geometry dash had 4 different sections you have to do to beat the level. Your success rate on the first section is 20%, your success rate by doingthe second section is 30%, your success rate on doing the third section is 40%, and your success rate on the last section is 15%. What is that chance of you beating the level if you have to get passed each section in a row without dying in order. If you die i. Section 3 or 4 you go all the way back to section 1 and have to do the level all over again ChatGPT said: ChatGPT To calculate the probability of beating the level, you need to pass all four sections in a single run. Since the probability of success for each section is independent, the overall probability is the product of the success rates for each section. Formula: P ( beating the level ) = P ( section 1 ) × P ( section 2 ) × P ( section 3 ) × P ( section 4 ) P(beating the level)=P(section 1)×P(section 2)×P(section 3)×P(section 4) Substituting the values: P ( section 1 ) = 0.20 P(section 1)=0.20 (20%) P ( section 2 ) = 0.30 P(section 2)=0.30 (30%) P ( section 3 ) = 0.40 P(section 3)=0.40 (40%) P ( section 4 ) = 0.15 P(section 4)=0.15 (15%) P ( beating the level ) = 0.20 × 0.30 × 0.40 × 0.15 P(beating the level)=0.20×0.30×0.40×0.15 Calculation: P ( beating the level ) = 0.0036 P(beating the level)=0.0036 Result: The probability of beating the level in one attempt is 0.36%. Interpretation: You have a 0.36% chance (about 1 in 278 attempts) of beating the level in a single run without dying. Me: Lets say the level had 12 sections but you had a 60% chance of passing each section If the level has 12 sections, and you have a 60% chance ( P = 0.60 P=0.60) of passing each section, the probability of beating the entire level (i.e., passing all 12 sections in a row) is: P ( beating the level ) = 0.6 0 12 P(beating the level)=0.60 12 Calculation: P ( beating the level ) = 0.60 × 0.60 × 0.60 × … (12 times) = 0.6 0 12 P(beating the level)=0.60×0.60×0.60×…(12 times)=0.60 12 P ( beating the level ) = 0.002176782336 P(beating the level)=0.002176782336 Result: The probability of beating the entire level is approximately 0.2177% (about 1 in 459 attempts). 1/2
"How short is too short for RobTop" is a WILD statement 💀
😂😂😂😂
😭💀
i dont get it
@confusingmiddleface good
@confusingmiddlefaceto your benefit
VSC can not get rated, unless rob wants to rate one of the hardest levels in the game as 2 stars (Beating a rated level over 2 stars in under 30 seconds activates the anti-cheat)
That would way too funny tho
also vsc has racist text sooo
that would be the only 2* level that was top 1 overall
like it was the hardest level in game for years
@@miniaturedeletionwhere???
idk if this is a hot take but im like 100000000% confident vsc will never be rated. Even if it was, robtop would probably unrate after seeing all the nazi shit in the level
totally agree.
1. levels under 30 seconds have almost never been rated and i think it's pretty clear robtop isnt going to rate them
2. VSC's deco is way below standard
3. the racist stuff
how did i never hear about that before? (the racist stuff)
theres also the fact that even tho cobwebs is 30 seconds, thats still twice as long as vsc lmaoooooo
@@David280GGsame
the WHAT
If the word next to the clock is "medium," "long," or "xl," it can be rated. If the word next to the clock is "tiny," or "short," it won't be rated-that's how it's always been.
XMas Challenge
tiny or short levels CAN be rated, but as someone else said, if a level is above 2 stars and it is beaten in shorted than medium time, it triggers the anti cheat
OHHHHHHH THATS WHY XMAS CHALLENGE WAS A 2 STAR
@@Speared_Was_Taken yah lol
i don't think robtop will rate vsc for 2 reasons
1. As you said, it's VERY short
2. I'm pretty sure it has a few racial slurs soooo
Yeah theres some hidden german text at the end screen that translates to something VERY antisemitic.
May I know what are the words and their translation?@cobaltrix
@@yuibaget better maybe?
what's it say, might needa censor it in the message lol
@@yuibatheres 2. If you hit a move trigger at the end, text appears in another language translating to "the jews are not human". Also, if you wait at the endscreen for about an hour, "NI" and "ER" appears around the "GG" forming... that word...
iirc VSC has some *slightly* racist stuff hidden in it and other highly questionable text objects that will stop it from getting a rate
The "slightly" in question:
these have been in the level for 6 years and you guys act like its the end of the world
@@vscviktor hes just stating a fact. Robtop still probably wont rate it, remember what happened with requiem? just a middle finger and it got beamed by rob
Its kinda funny that everyone is just now catching on that bo is a complete edgelord, like if you're in a call with him it's pretty obvious i thought everyone knew already.
Wait there is racist stuff in vsc?
I am so happy that cobwebs finally got rated
STOP BEING EVERYWHERE JJ WTF
@@redour-rs I can’t I am just everywhere
Bro is the SunnyV2 of Geometry Dash fr 💀
As the person who got first (accidentally) I'm telling everyone to make this top comment
HoW sPaCeUk DeStWoYeD HiS CaReEr In 30 DaYs
except unlike Sunny V2 he isn't a giant load of slop content
I like sunnyv2 but this is kind of inaccurate tbh
more like the Moistcr1tikal of Geometry Dash
yeeeeah rob will definitely not rate VSC as it has hidden triggers that activate slurs for the ends screen lol
Trololo
I kind of understand how this is important but we already have a rated 31 second 2.1 level that has existed for like 3+ years in Speequ which is also a demon
Yeah… tower descent
Idk how so many ppl forgot about this
@@SirLampsALotIve never heard of that level I was thinking of speequ
@@worno112 I was thinking of tower descent by pocke
There's a rated level that got unrated 2 years ago that was 9 seconds long pretty sure, it had been rated since 1.3 or sum like that
Can't forget Xmas challenge
There's no way VSC gets rated with anti jew messages in the level and several swastikas.
even with all that stuff removed it would have to be 2 stars because of the anti cheat
I do think the absolute limit for length should be medium or 30 seconds. Cobwebs still feels like a full level despite being that short.
I also think that the standards should get higher and higher the shorter the level is, so a level like cobwebs is only able to get rated because of just how good it looks (subjective ofc, though I would say the amount of detail is pretty objective, whether its good or not is something else)
3:30 i personally dont think injury will get rated, it looks fun, but probably not through with roberts standards
Cobwebs got rated because its technically SLIGHTLY over 30 seconds, meaning the gd servers recongnise it as a medium level. Something like VSC cant be rated because and tiny or short level cant be rated above 2 stars (rob has an anti cheat that makes it so any level above 2 stars thats beaten in less than 30 seconds is marked as cheated and will kick you out)
At this point to get a shorter demon rate we'll likely have to go into milliseconds
no, 28 seconds
@redour-rs 28 seconds is considered short length in-game which is too short for anything above 2*
@@propiggygd oh yeah good point
but a few levels have been rated with less than 30 seconds tho
@martdemon3314but I’m guessing they are all 2*
8:12 This is 100% the case. Robtop has been rating a lot of old levels recently, more than usual at least, so I think he is just getting around to rating some older levels that he failed to see the first time due to there being an influx of rates. Robtop is out of touch with the community in some aspects so this is probably the cause of a delayed cobwebs rate unfortunately :/
so that means he will rate DOOM finally
Karasu
RAIN getting rated soon 🙏
@@sirsamiboi I'd love to see rain get rated!! That was my favourite level at one point
Now I'm just waiting for Cyclolcyc to be rated
Are we just gonna pretend that tower descent doesnt exist? It got rated at 25 seconds, unrated and then rerated after a 5 second endscreen extension was added, meaning its 30 seconds long. Its a hard demon btw.
Also levels under 60 seconds and over 30 seconds have been getting rated for ages
6:12 challenge levels are required to be under 30 seconds, and the shortest possible length for a rated level is 30 seconds, so challenge levels will probably not get rated.
There have been numerous demons around the 30 second range that have been rated, most notably tower descent which was released over a year ago. Wish more research was done in that regard
didnt tower descent get an ending cutscene (strong word) added so it could be rated?
As a list player im quite certain cobwebs is placing around 90-150 range maybe even nlw if the extreme opinions from top players are popular
cobwebs was rated because it was medium, even tho its 30 seconds on the dot it hit that requirement
Tower descent:
I'm asking myself If he didn't just fixed the weird bug with medium length difficulty level that RobTop was talking about long ago ? And now he is just starting to rate good looking Medium length levels
wdym robtop has always been rating medium length levels
Cobwebs getting rated came out of left field from a different ballpark.
as soon as i heard short levels being rated i immediately thought of Injury and what would happen in its verification
UA-cam asked me what i thought about this video and i gave it the best smiley face :D
i so happy for cobwebs being rated, i was thinking about it before like a month or so. im so glad :)
wait what the first time i saw ur videos you had 8k subs now you have 43.2K subs .GG.
Reasons why VSC or Challenge Levels wont get rated
- Most challenge levels are below 30 seconds long
- a level that has a length of "tiny" and "short" will automatically get rated Easy (2*) due to RobTop's terrible anticheat
- some Challenge Levels are quite literally layouts
- VSC has some triggers that activate some uhmm, yeah stuff I don't wanna talk about
I'd love to see some CL levels rated if it were to be possible. I really like Apotheosis for example.
If a person who made a Challenge wants their level rated tho, they can simply extend the endscreen to match the 30 second length (APTeam ahhh method) this also worked when pocke released "Tower Descent" (Hard Demon)
Top 1s could be rammed through the roof in difficulty with the exchange of it being shorter.
its just a level bro the ideas room cant be this dry 😭
sno day
Props to the guy who beat cobwebs a few times as background footage for this video
I find it crazy that a level like cobwebs can get rated extreme but wcropolix stays unrated
Crazy theory, imagine a cobwebs fan hacking into robots account just to only rate cobwebs lmao 💀
Sick outta fashion rate when? 👁️
we need this one
Injury rated is everything I’ve ever wanted
i never understood why cobwebs wasnt rated when robtop rated unknown which is almost the same length. but i was suprised icobwebs got rated 2 years later
i bet rob was just trolling
the demonlist server has a channel called pending list changes which shows, well, pending list changes as well as if it will place on the main list extended list or too close to call. on there it says cobwebs will place extended list. global demonlist also has cobwebs placed at 132 however this will likely be very different on pointercrate bc of extra unrated levels being on global and a difference in accuracy of the placements between the two
Looking at the opinions of victors it's probably around top 120 on pointercrate. Highest placement I saw was around neutra (71) and lowest was knights of thunder (legacy / 160), most were in the range of 100-140.
I only know of this level‘s existence because it got rated so yeah more people will definitely go for it
bo is rate banned lol vsc never getting rated
why is he banned rho
So how's The Golden still rated? And Why tho?
@ Exactly
@@Z3pH4x it was rated before he got rate banned
If i remember right (probably not cause my memory is ass) i swear cobwebs was rated for a bit of time a few years ago. idk why it got unrated, probably drama, but i swear i tried playing the newly rated hard extreme demon on my shitty laptop a bit ago. also i remember there is an evw video about cobwebs (its a level request video) where he sent cobwebs. also it should a million percent be rated imo, the deco is fire and still holds up well to this day.
I saw a video titled smth like "These levels should be rated" and cobwebs was there so rob probably just saw that idk
1:49 bro im going for cobwebs and my hardets is cognition with only 3 extremes 😭😭😭
Wavix is just waffling
@MemePiano69 yea I'm just fuckin around xd
Im going for it too as my hardest is acu but ive got 30-82 kocmoc in 3 runs xD
"how short is too short for roptop?"
since speequ is also a 30 second demon level, and was rated a couple years ago, that debunks some of the things said in this video
VSC should not get rated. EVER
The problem is that challenge levels have to be below 30 seconds and cobwebs is still technically 30 seconds
vsc is NOT getting rated bro 💀
I WANT VSC RATED
Centipede and Based after Based might be rated though.
@yleyatarn and Abandoned Corridor
@yleyatarn hopefully find the answer too
Also, some redditors have found what they believe racist slurs at the end of VSC end-screen.
The "minimum" length for a rated level over 2 stars has always been 30 seconds. There's even been a lot of notable levels in the 30-60 second range that've been rated since 2.0 such as CITRA (37 seconds), kowareta (49 seconds) and tower descent (30 seconds). Cobwebs likely wasn't rated because RobTop hadn't gotten around to it.
Also there are no rated levels shorter than 30 seconds that aren't Auto or 2 stars. If you search in-game for Tiny / Short levels some higher than 2 stars will appear but they only show as Tiny / Short due to a bug and are actually longer than that.
This is honestly a shock to me. I saw this level and thought it was very cool but couldn't gain recognition due to the lack of a rate. I'm kinda glad it's rated now
earlier this week another 30 second level was rated and a 36 second one a month ago
Into the Summer by TroxxP1 (56879669) and a little level by Beljakow (112548875)
I thought UNKNOWN would place way lower but it's still at 40, so I would assume Cobwebs would stay about 5 spots behind when placed
In the Demon List Public Server upcoming list changes, it says that Cobwebs will be extended list
if challanges are rated the challenge list would die
Cuatrocientos first victor
Im guessing a level will have to be ATLEAST a medium, also, Pointercrate has stated that they predict this level to de somewhere in the extended list
Ive always felt that if a level is at least medium (which cobwebs is) it should have a chance to be rated. Like the lengths are in the game for a reason, why dont we use them to help set what can be rated. I do think that Medium levels should have slightly higher rate standards, but still not much higher.
Forgot this level existed lmao
Countless 30-second-long levels have been rated in the past; this is not new. There are even some rated 3-stars that are shorter than that.
nah, here's a challenge: make a top 1 with no frame perfects
I heard that cobwebs is like cognition difficulty, so it's most likely not even top 90
WE GOT A NEW CBF/WAVE-CARRIED JUMP TARGET 🔥🔥🔥
Rain (possible version) was verified and it's more than 30 seconds but never got rated
I know, I know I've let you down
I've been a fool to myself
I thought that I could live for no one else
But now, through all the hurt and pain
It's time for me to respect
The ones you love mean more than anything
So, with sadness in my heart
Feel the best thing I could do
Is end it all and leave forever
What's done is done, it feels so bad
What once was happy now is sad
I'll never love again
My world is ending
I wish that I could turn back time
'Cause now the guilt is all mine
Can't live without the trust from those you love
I know we can't forget the past
You can't forget love and pride
Because of that, it's killing me inside
It all returns to nothing
It all comes tumbling down
Tumbling down, tumbling down
It all returns to nothing
I just keep letting me down
Letting me down, letting me down
In my heart of hearts
I know that I could never love again
I've lost everything, everything
Everything that matters to me matters in this world
I wish that I could turn back time
'Cause now the guilt is all mine
Can't live without the trust from those you love
I know we can't forget the past
You can't forget love and pride
Because of that, it's killing me inside
It all returns to nothing
It just keeps tumbling down
Tumbling down, tumbling down
It all returns to nothing
I just keep letting me down
Letting me down, letting me down
It all returns to nothing
It just keeps tumbling down
Tumbling down, tumbling down
It all returns to nothing
I just keep letting me down
Letting me down, letting me down
Ah, ah, ah, ah
Tumbling down
Tumbling down
Tumbling down
Ah, ah, ah, ah
Letting me down
Letting me down
Letting me down
Ah, ah, ah, ah
Tumbling down
Tumbling down
Tumbling down
Ah, ah, ah, ah
Letting me down
Letting me down
Letting me down
Gomtree dask
Waving is cool
you could beat cobwebs around 19 times in the time it takes to watch this video
Bros over thinking maybe robtop decided to rate cobwebs just as a one-off? Like ik its been years but it could be that he just had a change of heart
People don't realise that the minimum length for a level is 30 seconds at least to get rated. Anything below 30 seconds is not rateable and I believe that robtop simply had no clue what cobwebs was and discovered it recently so he decided, well it's rate worthy so why not.
As long as it is listed medium length and longer roptop will rate it
vsc is short length, therefore restricting it from getting rated higher than 2 stars. also cobwebs is a medium length level, just like tower descent, while they are both 30 seconds long
My eyes widened the moment is saw the title
This will forever be the shortest Demon. The only reason its rated is because of the 2 second end screen which makes it a (Medium) Length and not short.
Doesn’t tower descent have a longer endscreen? That’s also 30 seconds long
@ huh?
idk Ive seen other levels be rated that are like 30 seconds long. Like some random 7 star I played a week ago and that one hard demon
Vsc is a bit of a stretch, rob literally can’t rate levels above 2 stars that are less than 30 seconds because it detects the player as a hacker, the same problem happened with Xmas adventurer, it was like easy demon and yet it got 2 stars. So unless robtop changes the anti-cheat, vsc can’t get rated.
Also, some levels need to be rated, like aquamarine, Ashley wave trials, based after based, apocalyptic trilogy, and old levels like element 11 rg, theory of darkness, and stereo demoness unerfed
shorter levels this shorter levels that rate more needle
what's next is breaking the anticheat again
welp, here goes rob again with his silly moves lol
Imma be honest, if i was Rob, first of all i would say why i rated a level this short.
About top level recognition, i think it would be funny to add a separate rate system for these kind of levels, like he already made legendary and mythic ratings for the best and most unique levels to give them a kind of aproval that the level is one of the best, so giving a special rate for the hardest levels in the game would make sense if he did it, due to the community's love and support for the verifiers and the levels.
bro is turning to pyro live of gd
Ive heard from people that have beaten it the cobwebs is abt cognition difficulty
only real ones beat cobwebs with the purple trigger before it was rated ‼‼
im jumping to cobwebs from deadlocked, wish me luck, WWW video btw
1:35 the golden is already out of the top 50
You think a lot of people would end up jumping to this even though the gameplay is quite hard even if just 30 seconds? I’m jumping to it rn from xo so you might be right lol.
thanks GD moistcritical
We might get martin and kate rated
I died to the last click of niwa when watching this video (':
im going for cobwebs from a random medium demon and have 50-100 its piss easy
Maybe we are yapping too much for got rate.
I think 30 seconds should be the hard limit, and even that should be rare though
vsc rated?
well considering the crap found in the level recently...
explain
@Tsa_Miceloa theres racist slurs above the level apparently
recently? that was known years ago
wasnt cobwebs 29 seconds but because of 2.2 it unintentionally went to 30 seconds? or am i thinking of smt else
Or mayby it will be easier to have some shorter videos on tiktok or youtube shorts. That's easy advertisement for robtop and the newer tiktok / youtube short creators? Mayby I'm just kidding? I hope it.
1:18 do you still dont know what global demonlist is? Cobwebs placement was there all 2+ years after verification so go just check position, check other levels that are close to it and look at position of these levels in pointercrate, it THAT simple
Global demon list is very inaccurate
@optm9160 still can't understand how people blame demonlist for inaccurate positions. I mean if your opinion is not the same as other opinions that's fine, but why you are blaming demonlist for that? Blame people, that have these opinions then🤦♂️
@@Ivan_Mihailick that’s not even what I said but there’s no point in adding the ranking if it could be inaccurate
@@optm9160 so what do you mean by "inaccurate" then
@@Ivan_Mihailick I said the list is inaccurate because it is I’m not blaming the list because there is no way to have a accurate list but the global list is more inaccurate the pointercrate
I hope Diabolic Clubstep is next
Pls be Eternal Theory
In my opinion cobwebs is easier then bloodlust, its so short its just like luck based. (“But Ascende4d, Geometry dadh is pure skill”) I agree but amagin you have a 10% chance to pass the first wave in cataclysm. Then after the first wave you have a 50% chance to get to the ship at 45%. The odds are taken to the power and are not multiplied. Meaning getting to 45% in cataclysm is like 5% chance. Another example is lets say you have a 99% chance of beating sterio madness. Well do 10 attempts and take 99% to the power of like 10, (in which 10 represents the amount if attempts you do) and the odds of you beating the level 10 times in a row is 90%. Now amagin your doing runs on bloodlust. Since it has more parts and is longer, you have a lower chance of beating it then cobwebs. Cobwebs is harder. Even if the odds of you getting passed the first section is alot lower chance then getting passed the first section in bloodlust, if you multiply each percentage together, the overall percentage of you beating bloodlust is lower then if you were to do cobwebs. It has a harder mental copasity because each attempt is so long. Compared to cobwebs which is so short. Here is an Example to better explain it because I suck at explaining.
Ah, I see what you mean now! You're asking about the probability of beating the level 10 times in a row, given a 99% chance of success per attempt.
Calculation:
Since the probability of success for each attempt is independent, the probability of succeeding 10 times in a row is the product of the success probabilities for each attempt:
P
(
10 successes in a row
)
=
0.9
9
10
P(10 successes in a row)=0.99
10
Step-by-Step:
P
(
10 successes in a row
)
=
0.99
×
0.99
×
0.99
×
…
(10 times)
=
0.9
9
10
P(10 successes in a row)=0.99×0.99×0.99×…(10 times)=0.99
10
Result:
P
(
10 successes in a row
)
=
0.904382
≈
90.44
%
P(10 successes in a row)=0.904382≈90.44%
Interpretation:
You have about a 90.44% chance of successfully beating the level 10 times in a row without dying.
You said:
What if the success rate was only 90%
ChatGPT said:
ChatGPT
If the success rate is 90% per attempt, the probability of beating the level 10 times in a row is calculated similarly:
P
(
10 successes in a row
)
=
0.9
0
10
P(10 successes in a row)=0.90
10
Step-by-Step:
P
(
10 successes in a row
)
=
0.90
×
0.90
×
0.90
×
…
(10 times)
=
0.9
0
10
P(10 successes in a row)=0.90×0.90×0.90×…(10 times)=0.90
10
Result:
P
(
10 successes in a row
)
=
0.348678
≈
34.87
%
P(10 successes in a row)=0.348678≈34.87%
Interpretation:
With a 90% success rate per attempt, the chance of beating the level 10 times in a row is about 34.87%.
You said:
take that information that I gave you and lets say that a level in geometry dash had 4 different sections you have to do to beat the level. Your success rate on the first section is 20%, your success rate by doingthe second section is 30%, your success rate on doing the third section is 40%, and your success rate on the last section is 15%. What is that chance of you beating the level if you have to get passed each section in a row without dying in order. If you die i. Section 3 or 4 you go all the way back to section 1 and have to do the level all over again
ChatGPT said:
ChatGPT
To calculate the probability of beating the level, you need to pass all four sections in a single run. Since the probability of success for each section is independent, the overall probability is the product of the success rates for each section.
Formula:
P
(
beating the level
)
=
P
(
section 1
)
×
P
(
section 2
)
×
P
(
section 3
)
×
P
(
section 4
)
P(beating the level)=P(section 1)×P(section 2)×P(section 3)×P(section 4)
Substituting the values:
P
(
section 1
)
=
0.20
P(section 1)=0.20 (20%)
P
(
section 2
)
=
0.30
P(section 2)=0.30 (30%)
P
(
section 3
)
=
0.40
P(section 3)=0.40 (40%)
P
(
section 4
)
=
0.15
P(section 4)=0.15 (15%)
P
(
beating the level
)
=
0.20
×
0.30
×
0.40
×
0.15
P(beating the level)=0.20×0.30×0.40×0.15
Calculation:
P
(
beating the level
)
=
0.0036
P(beating the level)=0.0036
Result:
The probability of beating the level in one attempt is 0.36%.
Interpretation:
You have a 0.36% chance (about 1 in 278 attempts) of beating the level in a single run without dying.
Me: Lets say the level had 12 sections but you had a 60% chance of passing each section
If the level has 12 sections, and you have a 60% chance (
P
=
0.60
P=0.60) of passing each section, the probability of beating the entire level (i.e., passing all 12 sections in a row) is:
P
(
beating the level
)
=
0.6
0
12
P(beating the level)=0.60
12
Calculation:
P
(
beating the level
)
=
0.60
×
0.60
×
0.60
×
…
(12 times)
=
0.6
0
12
P(beating the level)=0.60×0.60×0.60×…(12 times)=0.60
12
P
(
beating the level
)
=
0.002176782336
P(beating the level)=0.002176782336
Result:
The probability of beating the entire level is approximately 0.2177% (about 1 in 459 attempts).
1/2