900 Passenger Super Jet - The Lockheed Very Large Plane

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 7 лис 2022
  • Help the channel grow + get 10% off your first site and domain!
    www.squarespace.com/found
    NEW CHANNEL:
    • Launched from the bigg...
    Discord: / discord
    My News Channel: / @aviationstationyt
    Join this channel to get access to perks:
    / @foundandexplained
    Patreon:
    / foundandexplained

КОМЕНТАРІ • 1,2 тис.

  • @FoundAndExplained
    @FoundAndExplained  Рік тому +344

    Very special thanks to all those viewers that have been with us from under 1000 subs to 400,000 subs! This one is for you :)

    • @pyeitme508
      @pyeitme508 Рік тому

      WOW!

    • @PhalanxFPV
      @PhalanxFPV Рік тому

      GOOD JOB

    • @DounutCereal
      @DounutCereal Рік тому

      Ayyy, congrats man! Been subbed since you were at around 40k if I'm remembering right, it's been cool to watch things grow from here :D

    • @xorodux4638
      @xorodux4638 Рік тому +2

      what is that breathing in the background at 1:05 and 1:20?

    • @captainpoptarts
      @captainpoptarts Рік тому

      Been here since 20-30k

  • @aerodynamical
    @aerodynamical Рік тому +2152

    I wouldn't like to imagine Ryanair flying this.

    • @Cresette0
      @Cresette0 Рік тому +136

      Oh fuck, the airport collapse

    • @chinuexe
      @chinuexe Рік тому +172

      2000 passengers go brrrrrr...

    • @_JS96
      @_JS96 Рік тому +53

      Imagine Aerosucre getting their hands on one of these

    • @DeskPilot55
      @DeskPilot55 Рік тому +154

      Ryanair CEO: 900 passengers? Nah, remove the seats and 5000 passengers will fit inside (very safe, just like in a bus, but in the air)

    • @craigrmeyer
      @craigrmeyer Рік тому +46

      Oh man they would do it too. $100 a seat, but $20/minute in one of the four bathrooms. Free coffee, though.

  • @spencerstevens2175
    @spencerstevens2175 Рік тому +694

    You can't appreciate how gigantic the A380 is unless you see it in person. There was one next to us at De Gaulle a few years back. Absolutely massiveness

    • @whatthe7387
      @whatthe7387 Рік тому +7

      massive yes, but definately useless, that's why they stopped production.....and flying on them, pfft.....melbourne to Singapore as an example...1hr 15 mins longer on them....., Emirates wont have their order filled any time soon with the things...

    • @spencerstevens2175
      @spencerstevens2175 Рік тому +36

      @@whatthe7387 I'm not financially invested 😆

    • @franciskt4171
      @franciskt4171 Рік тому +59

      A 380 is a masterpiece which is its owner's pride and the competitors' envy.
      The plane is a symbol of luxury, not a means of economy.

    • @spencerstevens2175
      @spencerstevens2175 Рік тому +7

      @@franciskt4171 nah they didn't spend all that money on them to lose money lmao

    • @bmwv660
      @bmwv660 Рік тому +2

      I see almost everyday 😅

  • @Wehrnobyl
    @Wehrnobyl Рік тому +44

    2:10 i like how Lockheed martin is so used to making supersonic jets that they have to specify that the jet is subsonic.

  • @marksamuelsen2750
    @marksamuelsen2750 Рік тому +151

    I’m a 69yo disabled veteran and and retired pilot. I flew for a living for 35 years. Over all those years I flew a variety of aircraft. The nicest flying jet that I flew was the Lockheed L1149 4 jet engine corporate use aircraft. I was fun. The FAA Examiner who gav3 me the type rating checkride had been President Johnson’s Jetstar pilot. Damn that was a great flying machine.

    • @_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-
      @_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_- Рік тому

      69? Nice!

    • @Fc3s808
      @Fc3s808 Рік тому +3

      Wasted 30 minutes searching Google for a Lockheed L1149... don't think it's exists

    • @matthorseman2008
      @matthorseman2008 Рік тому +3

      @@Fc3s808 that's the jetstar

    • @matthorseman2008
      @matthorseman2008 Рік тому +1

      @Fc3s808 Elvis presley owned one as well and it's on display at Graceland

    • @johnstuartsmith
      @johnstuartsmith 9 місяців тому +1

      I think you are talking about the Lockheed L-1329 JetStar. The Lockheed L-1149 was a proposed turboprop powered version of the L-1049 Super Constellation that never went into production. Lockheed made some very nice planes....

  • @captain_commenter8796
    @captain_commenter8796 Рік тому +435

    Once again a absolute visual masterpiece! I can see the effort put into the models and renders! Some shots even looked real! Very awesome work Nick! Cheers to another 100k!

    • @FoundAndExplained
      @FoundAndExplained  Рік тому +29

      Thank you sir

    • @Benspringroll
      @Benspringroll Рік тому +3

      omg right! there were moments where i was like "wait!! they actually built them???" lmao

    • @mielewaschmaschinemielewae679
      @mielewaschmaschinemielewae679 7 місяців тому

      Srilankan

    • @k.r.99
      @k.r.99 7 місяців тому

      @@Benspringroll they used flight simulator mods 💀

    • @johnnyutah4517
      @johnnyutah4517 4 місяці тому

      Once again a visual masterpiece the doco tells us the Lockheed has a distance to travel of 3.2k nm or 5.9k km yet the 747(?) flies 7.73k nm or 5.9k km . . . . . Yes what a visual masterpiece ! ! !🤩😵‍💫 masterpiece of what running out of gas ! ! ! !

  • @a_literal_brick
    @a_literal_brick Рік тому +91

    Man. Sometimes I wish we lived in a world where designs weren't limited by practicality

    • @johnwang9914
      @johnwang9914 9 місяців тому +5

      You might get that eventually with a post-scarcity civilization but the concept of mass production would also end.

    • @BoazLarson-jj4pg
      @BoazLarson-jj4pg 7 місяців тому +3

      Anyone who loves aerospace agrees.

  • @g.zoltan
    @g.zoltan Рік тому +27

    7:06 It's so good to finally see a proper range projection and not just the funny circles!

    • @erikziak1249
      @erikziak1249 Рік тому +8

      If only the conversion to metric was correct. See 7:18. But I agree with you.

    • @WalidDamouny
      @WalidDamouny Рік тому +1

      @@erikziak1249 I was reading through the comments to see if I needed to point that out but here you are.

  • @ackelcurns4814
    @ackelcurns4814 Рік тому +78

    the cgi is absolutely stunning and looks almost like real life! but if it were built, just imagine a billionaire getting a hold of it and making it into a flying mansion!

    • @SamiltonAdventures
      @SamiltonAdventures Рік тому +11

      It should be the next Air Force One! Or just simply, The Flying White House 😂

  • @joeysijstermans1472
    @joeysijstermans1472 Рік тому +101

    This could've been an amazing cargo plane, like the an-225

    • @anonymike8280
      @anonymike8280 Рік тому +4

      That's one thought for what to do with it. But apparently the cargo conversions are difficult to load and unload compared to designed cargo planes. Airbus never developed a cargo version.

    • @michellejohnson3867
      @michellejohnson3867 Рік тому +1

      Was the an-225 that was, bigger than this one please? Xx

    • @MyBelch
      @MyBelch 8 місяців тому +2

      Standard shipping containers are far too heavy to ship by air.

    • @MattMcIrvin
      @MattMcIrvin Місяць тому

      @@MyBelch The biggest military transports apparently occasionally carry one. But the weight does seem like a problem for doing this in any cost-effective way.
      You can see the C-5 heritage in the renderings of this thing--I think that was their starting point.

  • @AaronShenghao
    @AaronShenghao Рік тому +155

    Have to say, Boeing made the right call to develop 777 and later 787 while cancelling 747-500 600 and 700... Which would be quite interesting to see those featured next on Found And Explained.
    I hope they can recover with recent blunders...

    • @kdrapertrucker
      @kdrapertrucker Рік тому +12

      Well Boeing had originally looked at a double deck design based on the 767 for the 777 design, but after modeling evacuation times, aircraft fitment at airport terminals, weight airport aprons were designed to support, etc. They decided that much larger aircraft were self defeating. The short career of the A-380 has proving this.

    • @craigrmeyer
      @craigrmeyer Рік тому

      I was told by someone that Boeing had been messing with Airbus the whole time, and trying to trick them into making a humongous jet like the A380.

    • @charleshammer2928
      @charleshammer2928 Рік тому +4

      The Triple 777 and A 350 are plenty big enough.

    • @WarhammerWings
      @WarhammerWings Рік тому +2

      I disagree.

    • @aforairplane
      @aforairplane Рік тому +1

      👈👈😘😘✈️✈️✈️
      I make aircraft video's

  • @CausticLemons7
    @CausticLemons7 Рік тому +43

    Wow! Has it been 2 and half years already? I remember the original video and I'm so happy to see how much your channel has grown. Your skills have also improved a lot!

  • @MiguelFloresDesign
    @MiguelFloresDesign Рік тому +16

    Great video, as always! The detail of the luggage falling down from the airplane at 5:52 made me laugh!!

  • @craigrmeyer
    @craigrmeyer Рік тому +55

    Excellent points here. Lockheed were the leaders in exotic composite materials at that time (Stealth Fighter, etc), so looking back, yes, they could have instead looked at a small/middle-sized jet with ultra-long range, and experimented with that idea instead. (Hindsight 20-20 etc.)

    • @iangodfrey4518
      @iangodfrey4518 Рік тому +4

      They needed something like a modernised Lockheed L-1011, albeit in twin jet form. That plane in it's original tri-jet form was revolutionary in its day. It's still beautiful to look at all these decades later.

    • @craigrmeyer
      @craigrmeyer Рік тому +1

      @@iangodfrey4518 Ah yes, right, and they'd just poured their hearts and souls into the L1011. So right then, they were so ready to one-up that in some creative new direction (like super-efficient composites). What a heartbreaker.

    • @farhanatashiga3721
      @farhanatashiga3721 Рік тому +1

      @@craigrmeyer blame rolls royce

    • @craigrmeyer
      @craigrmeyer Рік тому +1

      @@farhanatashiga3721 Blame Rolls-Royce for what? For the L-1011 not working out?

    • @baums547
      @baums547 Рік тому +1

      @@craigrmeyer RR was way behind in developing the central engine if I remember correctly. One of the reasons the L-1011 was late to market which resulted in poor sales. Not the only reason though. There is a great channel called Mustard on UA-cam that did a great video on the plane.

  • @wormyboot
    @wormyboot Рік тому +3

    I like how the bags spilled out when you took the roof off.

  • @citynomad13
    @citynomad13 Рік тому +23

    Good and interesting as always. But I think there is a typo in the range discussion at 7:18, you use 5,900 km twice in conversion from nm ..

    • @TV-kj3gi
      @TV-kj3gi Рік тому +5

      Yes, noticed it too.
      Stated is Range 3.200nm (5.900km) for vlsa, and 7.730nm (5.900km) for the 747. Correct values should be 7.730nm (14.300km) for the latter

    • @M3CHR0M4NC3R
      @M3CHR0M4NC3R Рік тому +2

      Yup, I saw that too

    • @idojac6738
      @idojac6738 Рік тому +1

      Saw that too

  • @glenn_r_frank_author
    @glenn_r_frank_author Рік тому +9

    Always love your videos because of the amazing animations / models you show and the information packed narration! Congratulations on another mile-marker in subscribers!

  • @anthonystaltari511
    @anthonystaltari511 Рік тому +13

    Flying the A380 is still the most comfortable plane! I wish something like this was built that could give a bit of room to move around.

    • @MyBelch
      @MyBelch 8 місяців тому +1

      I've flown many, many times in 747s and A380s and can report there is no difference as a passenger. None whatsoever.

  • @60gregma
    @60gregma Рік тому +10

    Lockheed has never had much success in the private sector, which is too bad. I loved flying on the amazing and comfortable L-1011.

  • @therealkarlmarx1818
    @therealkarlmarx1818 Рік тому +3

    I really like how the cutaway model even showed a few bags falling out of the side of the storage compartment. Nice touch lol.

  • @simons5193
    @simons5193 Рік тому +16

    What an amazing looking plane. It would have been quite a spectacle watching this thing landing and taking off.

  • @SamiltonAdventures
    @SamiltonAdventures Рік тому +8

    Thanks for the great detail you go in to for these videos! The 3d graphics are always IMPECCABLE!

  • @brycestewart7228
    @brycestewart7228 Рік тому +2

    Thank you. It's great to have seen this channel grow. Keep up the great work. Can't wait to see what you do next.

  • @Happy_Fun_Ball
    @Happy_Fun_Ball Рік тому +2

    The visuals are amazing! Mustard certainly has a rival now

  • @bobboberson2024
    @bobboberson2024 Рік тому +5

    Exellent presentation. You guys found some real gems in the 3D graphics - really good. I love the luggage falling out with the blow-up model!

  • @YouPube_X
    @YouPube_X Рік тому +6

    That thing looks cool AF!

  • @striker705
    @striker705 Рік тому +2

    Its great to see your animations get better and better with each video!

  • @richardhall1667
    @richardhall1667 Рік тому +3

    Super impressed with the visuals on this bad boy. Keep it up!

  • @dehavillandcanadatwinotter9621
    @dehavillandcanadatwinotter9621 Рік тому +13

    When we thought Lockheed was already crazy with the CL-1201, they propose this.
    I wish Lockheed had entered the civilian aircraft more. Their L-1011 was apparently quite lived and they also had a piston engine/later turboprop that saw success. Shame I was born too late to experience Lockheed’s aircraft.

    • @MattMcIrvin
      @MattMcIrvin Місяць тому

      The Lockheed Constellation/Super Constellation, yes--that was one of the most popular airliners of the pre-jet era. It was a beautiful aircraft--I saw the one on display outside the main building at Seattle's Museum of Flight.
      (I'd forgotten that the National Air and Space Museum also has one--but theirs is the military variant, on display at Udvar-Hazy with state national guard livery.)

  • @anderskandersson4613
    @anderskandersson4613 Рік тому +10

    Absolutely beautiful engineering, Lockheed never abandoned the legendary C5 Galaxy design. 360’ view look around , this beast is definitely “ God of the sky “ ❤ ❤❤❤

  • @antipoti
    @antipoti Рік тому +1

    The ending was so heartfelt. ❤️ I am really happy to be subscribed to this channel! And looking through the screen: you are very welcome!

  • @armedhyde1448
    @armedhyde1448 Рік тому +1

    Thank you for making these quite informative videos!

  • @marktugovikov4303
    @marktugovikov4303 Рік тому +7

    Thank you for doing more bigger planes. I hope there will be much more!

  • @devilemperor6668
    @devilemperor6668 Рік тому +4

    Bro , the Animation and everything Looked so Real... If this Video was shown at that time then we might have seen this Plane in Reality... Love every video you and your team make... The time and Effort goes is very big but the End Result is Amazin... Keep Bringin More... GOD bless you , your team and your families with lots of love and happiness and with good health and wealth...

  • @UncleManuel
    @UncleManuel Рік тому +1

    Thumbs up for the cutaway sequence. I had to giggle at the cargo falling out and Captain Picard standing there... 😁😇✌️

  • @jnorth6022
    @jnorth6022 Рік тому +9

    Still this Very Large plane could do lots of good for the Airforce, IF such craft could land without destroying rundways.
    Wonderful video! Loved that little figure of Capt. Pickard inside the cutaway view. Awesome.

  • @The_Sniper13
    @The_Sniper13 Рік тому +4

    You know it's heavy when it has 2 landing gears.

  • @peanuts2105
    @peanuts2105 Рік тому +3

    I’m an aircraft engineer on the A380 - believe me, she is huge to work and very labour intensive. MTOW of 565 tonnes for an aircraft that can travel halfway around the globe always amazes me. Just don’t ask me about wheel changes and lightning strike inspections and repairs 😮

    • @bobby1970
      @bobby1970 Рік тому

      I just flew on a British Airways Airbus A380 from Miami to London Heathrow. It's truly like being in a flying house. It's incredibly wide and majestic. I was just wondering, how long have you been an engineer on the A380?

    • @peanuts2105
      @peanuts2105 Рік тому +1

      @@bobby1970 about 5 years chief

    • @bobby1970
      @bobby1970 Рік тому

      @@peanuts2105 That's awesome.

  • @miou118google
    @miou118google 8 місяців тому +1

    Awesome content as always F&E
    Keep up this beautiful work 👍

  • @ArchOfWinter
    @ArchOfWinter Рік тому +1

    I laughed when the luggage fell out of cargo compartment during the cutaway removal!
    Neat little details.

  • @ben_and_jace
    @ben_and_jace Рік тому +11

    You forgot to mention:
    With just a single design flaw, the fuselage could have disintegrated mid-flight under its own weight.

    • @bobby1970
      @bobby1970 Рік тому +1

      I'm sure the engineers would eventually come up with a design that actually works and is safe.

    • @raidenshotgun5997
      @raidenshotgun5997 Рік тому +1

      @@bobby1970 I'm sure those same engineers thought the same for the Boeing 787 Max

    • @bobby1970
      @bobby1970 Рік тому

      @@raidenshotgun5997 Well, at least the Airbus engineers would also be joining in on the project with their own expertise. I still believe such an aircraft can be safely designed and built. There has to be a way.

    • @smokingspitfire1197
      @smokingspitfire1197 Рік тому +4

      @@raidenshotgun5997 What the hell is a 787 Max? Are you mixing a 737 Max and a 787?

    • @anonymike8280
      @anonymike8280 Рік тому +1

      Are you talking about my wife again? Hee-haw!

  • @kpeterrafael
    @kpeterrafael Рік тому +3

    7:22 7730nm are 14300km.

  • @davidrichards2237
    @davidrichards2237 Рік тому +1

    I appreciate you looking at my eyeballs through the screen and thanking me. That felt very personal. You're very welcome! I can say I feel as though I can see you edit your videos through my phone keyboard, and thank you for all of your hard work.

  • @theunknowndude8878
    @theunknowndude8878 Рік тому +1

    I love your videos thank you for putting so much effort into them.

  • @joshuamoore3049
    @joshuamoore3049 Рік тому +3

    This plane is my favorite of the never built airplanes despite its flaws. I am glad to see its video get a remake.

    • @AjayAjay-gz3oz
      @AjayAjay-gz3oz Рік тому

      Look out for the LTA-ICC.. a 15,000 Passenger ZERO POLLUTION LTA (Lighter-Than-Air) Inter-Continental Cruiser... for a ZERO POLLUTION EARTH... with a Across the World travel for $500-700 per person... each way..

    • @anonymike8280
      @anonymike8280 Рік тому +1

      @@AjayAjay-gz3oz Ask me, it's a sneaky way to combat overpopulation. Would I fly on it? At my age, it all depends!😄😄😄

  • @SlushieeeeTheCatgirl
    @SlushieeeeTheCatgirl Рік тому +5

    wanted to quickly leave a suggestion for a plane to look at, The BI-1 if it wasn't already looked at

    • @SlushieeeeTheCatgirl
      @SlushieeeeTheCatgirl Рік тому

      just to TL;DR the plane, its a Russian / Soviet Experimental Rocket Plane, and i mean literally... Rocket... it used delta-v to fly alone. wiki on it for people who hate typing -> en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bereznyak-Isayev_BI-1

  • @redbeard3574
    @redbeard3574 Рік тому +1

    Nice touch with the Boeing Sonic Cruiser in the background at 5:23 and 12:57

  • @aitoaster324
    @aitoaster324 Рік тому

    chuffed for you, been watching for well over a year now love your stuff

  • @egalecat6187
    @egalecat6187 Рік тому +6

    This plane is best for carrying both freighter and passenger similar to RoRo. If built it would be a revolutionary and a milestone in avaition world. Looking forward to see this in my generation.

  • @skakamj0lk
    @skakamj0lk Рік тому +3

    I never knew 3200 and 7730 nm both equalled to 5900 km, but it's nice to have less details to remember

  • @VladislavGoranov
    @VladislavGoranov Рік тому +2

    Captain Picard inside the scaled model plane! Nice detail!

  • @LBG-cf8gu
    @LBG-cf8gu Рік тому

    My 1st time here. All the tech described in detail. Thanks for the upload.

  • @smurftums
    @smurftums Рік тому +3

    Small refinement, the Boeing 747 range of 7730 nautical miles translates to 14316km, not 5900km. :)

  • @blaster915
    @blaster915 Рік тому +3

    I wonder if someone has made a model of this for Flight simulator yet? Love to give it a whirl in the sky!

  • @jaymanla
    @jaymanla Рік тому

    Congratulations on reaching 400K, Nick!

  • @steveschmidt5574
    @steveschmidt5574 Рік тому

    Keep up the great work! Love the videos.

  • @ronaldcharan2705
    @ronaldcharan2705 Рік тому +7

    Would be nice to see Lockheed return to commercial aviation. The tristar was such a gorgeous aircraft.

    • @johnstuartsmith
      @johnstuartsmith 9 місяців тому +1

      It was. Sadly, it competed for airline sales against the 747 and DC-10. Rolls-Royce suffered a lot of problems making reliable composite turbofan blades for the L-1011's engines, and by the time Lockheed could guarantee delivery of TriStars, airlines had already placed many orders for Lockheed's competitors. It was another great, well-designed aircraft that never sold enough units to pay for what they cost to be developed.

  • @perpetualgrin5804
    @perpetualgrin5804 Рік тому +3

    It's not until you drive a 380 do you realise how smooth they are, a credit to Mitsubishi.

  • @carltonleboss
    @carltonleboss Рік тому +1

    Congrats on 400K!

  • @ironbeagle1610
    @ironbeagle1610 8 місяців тому +1

    my goodness is that a cool looking plane, the split rudder and top mounted wings are a combination that looks so good, cant speak for how good it would actually perform however.

  • @Blutrauschhobbit
    @Blutrauschhobbit Рік тому +3

    Very nice video. Small error: 7:17 You copy pasted the range in km over to the 747.

  • @stefan_5.7
    @stefan_5.7 Рік тому +6

    I wonder what it's size would would've been compared to the Antonov AN-225

    • @borisyurinov4822
      @borisyurinov4822 Рік тому

      Good question. Did the Antonov stop flying after being bombed ?

    • @stefan_5.7
      @stefan_5.7 Рік тому

      @@borisyurinov4822 yes it was practically demolished and they don't know if it's worth it to rebuild

    • @borisyurinov4822
      @borisyurinov4822 Рік тому

      @@stefan_5.7 oh well. It was on its way out anyway. Old , too thirsty, no spare parts. Now Ukrane can ask their USA / EU friends to build them a new one. Maybe Boeing and Airbus can help out. And Lockheed Martin can do rockets for commercial planes. 😆

  • @richardstewart6160
    @richardstewart6160 Рік тому

    And congrats on 400k!!! from here in Glenorchy Tasmania!

  • @GasBunny
    @GasBunny 8 місяців тому +1

    5:37 - "What it'd be like to fly onboard"

  • @emanym
    @emanym Рік тому +3

    They should make the giant jet. It’s beautiful. 🎉

  • @VAALLDDOO2
    @VAALLDDOO2 Рік тому +8

    I think we have reach in an era where big plane are no longer in use

    • @foxgaming76yt24
      @foxgaming76yt24 Рік тому +2

      That's pretty obvious lmao

    • @coopermurray3265
      @coopermurray3265 Рік тому

      @@foxgaming76yt24 not necessarily - big planes still have their needs. Look at Emirates - they want Airbus to make A380's again because they need more to keep up with current demand in airports like LHR and DXB because slots are hard to come by nowadays. Thus makes sense to use bigger aircraft.

    • @foxgaming76yt24
      @foxgaming76yt24 Рік тому

      @@coopermurray3265 For Emirates, sure. But it's pretty well known that the A380 did not have sufficient demand within the aviation industry to be considered a success. Nevertheless, it'll be interesting if Airbus decides to resume production again, although, I doubt they will

    • @coopermurray3265
      @coopermurray3265 Рік тому

      @@foxgaming76yt24 True. I wouldn't be completely surprised if airbus did come to the table to develop something like a 2 engine a380, providing Emirates would commit to a large order

    • @foxgaming76yt24
      @foxgaming76yt24 Рік тому

      @@coopermurray3265 I wonder how high the engine will have to be, I expect both the bypass ratio to be incredibly high and be large at the same time, so a new engine is most likely needed, and I'm not sure if any of the main/well known engine manufacturers are willing to design a relatively new engine design just to accommodate for something of a novelty aircraft for a single airline.

  • @BigMathis
    @BigMathis Рік тому +1

    I need to build that thing in Besiege one day. I just know it's gonna be a pain in the *** to do so

  • @Maglev7
    @Maglev7 8 місяців тому

    Love the design of this absoulutely master piece

  • @DannijeL
    @DannijeL Рік тому +9

    Best flight in my live was in A380. Its so massive that you dont know if you are flying or you are still on the ground. I am really sad that all companies grounded A380 😢

    • @bushbrodda9969
      @bushbrodda9969 Рік тому +2

      ANA still flies the a380 called the flying honu (turtle)

    • @mrpoopybuttface
      @mrpoopybuttface Рік тому

      not every company

    • @TheGecko213
      @TheGecko213 Рік тому

      Emirates , BA Lufthansa have been flying them since last year

    • @anonymike8280
      @anonymike8280 Рік тому +1

      The A-380 will fly until all of the airframes have to be retired. The transportation model that made the very large civilian transport model economic was hub-and-spoke. To the degree hub-and-spoke became passe, so did the very large transport. I wouldn't call the A-380 an absolute failure but the business model passed it by.
      I've never seen the A-380 either in the air or on the ground that I know of. I did see the AN-225 right over my head on the glide path into McChord in Lakewood, Washington. I may have seen the Boeing 787 on its first test flight, but I'm not absolutely sure.

    • @TheGecko213
      @TheGecko213 Рік тому

      @Phillip Banes
      A380 was only made for Emirates.
      Others just tried it as an experiment

  • @SciHeartJourney
    @SciHeartJourney Рік тому +6

    "It is unsinkable. God Himself could not sink this vessel." - Cal from Titanic 🙄

  • @jerrodbroholm4338
    @jerrodbroholm4338 Рік тому

    I've been eagerly awaiting this episode since you started teasing pictures.
    Completely impractical for sure, but such a beautiful design.

  • @bradrothberg5863
    @bradrothberg5863 Рік тому +1

    great model Andrei

  • @Ztbmrc1
    @Ztbmrc1 Рік тому +3

    Impressive plane. But indeed, the demand for big airplanes was once realistic, but changed over the last 10 years. The A380 is one example of that changed demand. Nice sims. Can someone make this plane for X-plane or FS?

  • @DtWolfwood
    @DtWolfwood Рік тому

    Love it when the acronym includes adverbs like "Very" in them

  • @clarencehopkins7832
    @clarencehopkins7832 Рік тому

    Excellent stuff bro

  • @taridean
    @taridean Рік тому

    Great video. Looks like Mustard now has competition.

  • @donaldfields755
    @donaldfields755 Рік тому +1

    Jean Luc Picard @ 6:07. Love it!😉

  • @animaljustice7774
    @animaljustice7774 8 місяців тому +1

    I cannot wait to take an A380 flight again. I took one and 2017 it was the best flight ever been on. And I was on the top floor also. This type of plane is purely magical.

  • @pekenjos
    @pekenjos Рік тому

    Very interesting, thank you.

  • @darksnakenerdmaster
    @darksnakenerdmaster Рік тому

    That plane looks so good with the iconic Qantas tail

  • @lepiboyo201
    @lepiboyo201 4 місяці тому

    5:50 Love how they modeled luggage falling out for no reason at all xD when they ripped the cap back on that bad boy.

  • @ahmedmansour8784
    @ahmedmansour8784 Рік тому

    Thank you. Very nice video

  • @TheCynopT
    @TheCynopT Рік тому

    You are doing great job thank you!

  • @critical_always
    @critical_always Рік тому

    At 5:50 luggage falling out as the model is dissected. Brilliant.

  • @budgetbuyoutmisc.4916
    @budgetbuyoutmisc.4916 Рік тому

    Thank you

  • @77772013
    @77772013 8 місяців тому

    I absolutely love aviation and your videos bring to life the history of aviation is a beautiful way never stop making videos.

  • @faze_jg1454
    @faze_jg1454 Рік тому

    Amazing vid can't wait to see another one keep it up

  • @seanys
    @seanys Рік тому +1

    I see you, Jean-Luc!

  • @blaster915
    @blaster915 Рік тому

    5:24 Nice touch of the Boeing SST on the left there 👍🏻

  • @benodaboy
    @benodaboy Рік тому

    This Chanel has come a long way since i last checked in a year ago

  • @tobiaspramono378
    @tobiaspramono378 11 місяців тому

    Sometimes the greatest collab doesnt have happy ending

  • @dimasbaltas2552
    @dimasbaltas2552 Рік тому +1

    Невероятный Самолёт

  • @mikejohnson5900
    @mikejohnson5900 Рік тому

    Well done video Sir.

  • @kymmoulds
    @kymmoulds Рік тому

    Well done and very interesting. A BIG thumbs up.

  • @viktor_v-ughnda_vaudville_476

    Your the best man congrats on 400k

  • @qianma6921
    @qianma6921 Рік тому +1

    The tailfin looked so cursed XD

  • @randoviral8113
    @randoviral8113 Рік тому

    Smoothest transition so far

  • @jimsvideos7201
    @jimsvideos7201 Рік тому +1

    The renders in this are _bananas._

  • @Tropic101x
    @Tropic101x Рік тому +1

    Would be so cool. Excellent visuals btw!

  • @hendrikbarboritsch7003
    @hendrikbarboritsch7003 Рік тому +1

    The wide body looks cool, but makes for fewer window seats to divide among the total amount of passangers.