Korean Air Could Retire Airbus A220s After Asiana Merger

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 1 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 84

  • @alooga555
    @alooga555 10 місяців тому +138

    Delta will happily take the aircraft.

    • @Sacto1654
      @Sacto1654 10 місяців тому +16

      Especially with the need to retire the Delta A320ceo fleet.

    • @williamerazo3921
      @williamerazo3921 10 місяців тому +4

      Yup

  • @davestevens4193
    @davestevens4193 10 місяців тому +77

    Delta will take all of them. Nice plane to fly on for about 2 hours.

  • @DennisTae
    @DennisTae 10 місяців тому +49

    KE has A321neo, no ceo's

  • @Flynn58
    @Flynn58 10 місяців тому +36

    Those planes will get snapped up on the resale market, too many A220-flying airlines who want to increase lift or accelerate phaseout of older, less efficient aircraft with higher fuel costs.

  • @pouchok8657
    @pouchok8657 10 місяців тому +23

    Korean Air : Who wants some A220?
    Airlines : *Mine Mine Mine Mine Mine Mine*

  • @EK244_EMIRATES
    @EK244_EMIRATES 10 місяців тому +14

    I really don’t want Asiana to merge with Korean air

  • @DnD_Robb404
    @DnD_Robb404 10 місяців тому +7

    Why did KE merge with OZ in the first place?

    • @힐만94
      @힐만94 10 місяців тому +3

      that is my question too... just wondering what happened since they already dominate korean sky, even have "shadowing" schedule (imagine KE & OZ A380s take off simultaneously from LAX) 🤔

    • @user-yx1og3hr7q
      @user-yx1og3hr7q 8 місяців тому

      After the pandemic, Asiana fell into capital erosion and is now surviving thanks to the merger. If the merger fails, Asiana will soon go bankrupt.

  • @ricahrdb
    @ricahrdb 10 місяців тому +25

    KA would be better off selling their 737's. Asiana doesn't have those but they do have A320's, which KA also operates.

    • @DarkAndVelvetNights
      @DarkAndVelvetNights 10 місяців тому

      The 737 is the backbone of their. They have more those than A321 and A220 combined. So it makes sense to just retire the A220. The A220 is also their only aircraft that's not designed by Boeing or Airbus so it requires different training and maintanance.

  • @managed9348
    @managed9348 10 місяців тому +7

    Air Canada would like to know there location

  • @Capt.OggyPeabodyOfficial
    @Capt.OggyPeabodyOfficial 10 місяців тому +9

    If Korean Air Lines merged together with Asiana Airlines this means by definition that Korean Air will leave the SkyTeam Alliance despite being one of the founders of SkyTeam along with Air France, Delta Airlines and AeroMexico

    • @mattromanes
      @mattromanes 10 місяців тому +12

      I read somewhere that Asiana will leave Star Alliance and join Skyteam. This to me seems like the more choice since it will be Asiana who will be absorbed into Korean Air.
      Think American-US Airways merger.

    • @Capt.OggyPeabodyOfficial
      @Capt.OggyPeabodyOfficial 10 місяців тому +1

      @@mattromanes or BETTER, Continental United Airlines merger

  • @stickynorth
    @stickynorth 10 місяців тому +19

    The planes would probably fetch top dollar since they are in high demand if they did...

  • @김동욱-v4p
    @김동욱-v4p 10 місяців тому +6

    Korean Air does not operate any type of A320ceo, Asiana does.

  • @johnmoloney5296
    @johnmoloney5296 10 місяців тому +16

    Its time Airbus took p&w to task on the engine issues

    • @Blank00
      @Blank00 9 місяців тому +1

      Or how about this? PW needs to take themselves to task on the engine issue. There is nothing that Airbus or Boeing could do about engine issues.

    • @johnmoloney5296
      @johnmoloney5296 9 місяців тому

      @@Blank00 both, you know how it goes, it takes customer pressure for manufacturers to own up, no airbus or Boeing didn't manufacture those parts therefore they shouldn't have to pick up the slack

    • @Blank00
      @Blank00 9 місяців тому

      @@johnmoloney5296 if it takes customer pressure, then the airlines should be the ones calling engine manufacturers out. Engine manufacturers get money directly from airlines, not via some middleman at Airbus or Boeing

    • @johnmoloney5296
      @johnmoloney5296 9 місяців тому

      @@Blank00 exactly, they should pile on the pressure considering its the most expensive part of the whole aircraft

  • @DarkAndVelvetNights
    @DarkAndVelvetNights 10 місяців тому +5

    Will the Asiana branding still exist and all the planes still fly in the Asiana livery or is all going to be Korean Air?

    • @philiphighley4004
      @philiphighley4004 10 місяців тому +1

      Don't know for sure but they'll probably drop the Asiana brand if history with other mergers teaches us anything

  • @Tpr_1808
    @Tpr_1808 10 місяців тому +4

    Imagine how quickly they'd get rid of them if they were a321 neos😮

  • @zulharriansyahsyamsul3970
    @zulharriansyahsyamsul3970 10 місяців тому +1

    Are because of engine?

    • @Blank-777
      @Blank-777 10 місяців тому

      Yes. All A350, A380 will be retired due to RR engines

  • @sunrayz81
    @sunrayz81 10 місяців тому +1

    For goodness sake, KE should phase out OZ's louzy aircraft and poor service!

  • @philiphighley4004
    @philiphighley4004 10 місяців тому +2

    Would make more sense to remove 737s

    • @Blank-777
      @Blank-777 10 місяців тому

      They already moved elder 737s and MAXes to its subsidiary.

    • @VamarSwiss
      @VamarSwiss 7 місяців тому +1

      Keep hating it am avoiding any Airbus aircraft try to change me.

  • @zionismisterrorism8716
    @zionismisterrorism8716 10 місяців тому +5

    Will Korean Air keep Asiana's a350s?

    • @YBNmadman
      @YBNmadman 10 місяців тому +2

      Sure Hope so

    • @CoSmicGoesRacing
      @CoSmicGoesRacing 10 місяців тому +1

      Hoping they would.

    • @aydoyt
      @aydoyt 10 місяців тому +1

      No. Korean Air does not operate any Rolls Royce engined aircraft which means their A380s will also go.

    • @CoSmicGoesRacing
      @CoSmicGoesRacing 10 місяців тому +3

      @@aydoyt this was already confirmed. Both Korean and Asiana are retiring their A380 fleets in 2026. (KAL has 10 while Asiana has 6)

    • @adamtonkin3800
      @adamtonkin3800 10 місяців тому +2

      @@CoSmicGoesRacingand come 2030 watch them cry over capacity/slot restrictions. A380s time hasn’t quite come yet

  • @jo-didthatbeatdirty182
    @jo-didthatbeatdirty182 10 місяців тому

    Caribbean airlines needs some of this aircraft

  • @alextelifecreatively
    @alextelifecreatively 6 місяців тому

    I don’t think so

  • @SKYSTAR767
    @SKYSTAR767 10 місяців тому +1

    Don't worry delta will take them

  • @timkaheichan9170
    @timkaheichan9170 10 місяців тому +1

    Get air canada to take them it lmaoo

  • @DAZABPRA
    @DAZABPRA 10 місяців тому

    Nooo Pls no it looks so good

    • @Blank-777
      @Blank-777 10 місяців тому

      Well they announced that it won't be retired in 2024. So nobody knows 🤔

  • @chicagolanddesigns6447
    @chicagolanddesigns6447 10 місяців тому +11

    Praying this merger fails

  • @parimal7528
    @parimal7528 10 місяців тому +4

    A220 remains more grounded than in air. Useless Canadian Bombardier couldn't rectify it, nor could Airbus. Fuel tank issue, PW unreliable engines only add to A220 woes.

    • @thecaynuck
      @thecaynuck 10 місяців тому +3

      No, its flying just fine

  • @vedymin1
    @vedymin1 10 місяців тому +3

    There is sum tomfoolery afoot...

  • @williamerazo3921
    @williamerazo3921 10 місяців тому

    Retire huh. Just sale them

  • @AlfCalson
    @AlfCalson 10 місяців тому +1

    ✈️

  • @jackass130nm
    @jackass130nm 10 місяців тому

    no more a220 in hk lol

  • @andimilan5348
    @andimilan5348 10 місяців тому +2

    😂

  • @flypawels
    @flypawels 10 місяців тому +2

    👍

  • @SIG1911
    @SIG1911 10 місяців тому +5

    Embraer E-Jet family 😂

  • @M167A1
    @M167A1 10 місяців тому +10

    In fairness they are made in Canada. Nobody wants that

    • @GABRIEL-dz9mh
      @GABRIEL-dz9mh 10 місяців тому +23

      Why?

    • @avinashegala5799
      @avinashegala5799 10 місяців тому +2

      ​@@GABRIEL-dz9mh it's just rebadged cs100

    • @damnbobthebuilders
      @damnbobthebuilders 10 місяців тому +36

      @@avinashegala5799 What does that have to do with anything? The A220 is one of the best short haul aircraft in production. CS100/300 A220-100/300 same thing. nothing wrong with it being made in canada, sure is better then old designs like the A320 and 737 family

    • @eduardgenardandalis1437
      @eduardgenardandalis1437 10 місяців тому

      @@avinashegala5799*rebranded

    • @avinashegala5799
      @avinashegala5799 10 місяців тому

      @@damnbobthebuilders yeah it's better then old a320 and 737 probably that's the reason airlines bought the older older aircrafts which lead to separating the program from original company in 2014 laid of workers and ultimately sold to airbus

  • @antbotsquad6769
    @antbotsquad6769 10 місяців тому +2

    Yayyy a220 worst plane. E295 is way nicer

    • @MG101
      @MG101 10 місяців тому +13

      they’re both good, no need to be annoying

    • @fkaptijn7111
      @fkaptijn7111 10 місяців тому +2

      they both have the same engines. These engines have the same problems on both aircraft. So both are equally unreliable. This is not due to the manufacturer of the device.

    • @neilpickup237
      @neilpickup237 10 місяців тому +1

      Which airlines A220s have you flown on?
      I have flown on ones from Swiss and from Baltic and found them to be excellent

    • @CongressSux1776
      @CongressSux1776 10 місяців тому +2

      @@neilpickup237
      I agree. I flew with breeze airlines brand new 220 last summer, and will fly with Swiss in one later this week.
      Great aircraft

    • @thecaynuck
      @thecaynuck 10 місяців тому

      Worst plane? You're crazy. The A220 is selling much better and is better built. They're excellent to fly on. No need to be rude about it. Also, if you're talking about the E195 E2, it uses the same exact engine, which have the same problems.