Check out my Meditation app: Level SuperMind Get Android - bit.ly/AndroidApp_Link Get iOS - apple.co/3SyiPcE Know more about Level : bit.ly/levellinktree
Following these channel was the best decision in my life. My life has changed a lotttttt or more I say my perspectives. The knowledge we get through your every video is just incredible........love from Bengal❤️❤️
2:32 ☺️ It made me little happy when he was explaining how object moves it increases mass which I just study yesterday (Class 12 physics chapter nuclei)
There is no increase in mass when something approaches the speed of light. It is a concept of relativistic mass in which mass is multiplied by the gamma function (present in theory of relativity of E=MC^2). Mass does NOT increase or does NOT become infinite at the speed of light. Bottom line: actual mass is NOT equal to relativistic mass.
Don't take your education from these guys. They don't know about cosmic issues or physics. Relativistic mass is a childish way of trying to make young children to be introduced to the theory of relativity. Mass does NOT increase with increase in speed while approaching the speed of light.
It is not really increasing its mass. A simple way to understand this to first understand that acceleration and mass are interchangeable. This is counter-intuitive at first. But think what happens when you go close to a large body with immense gravity - time slows down. Time dilation also happens as you approach the speed of light. Like two sides of an equation, this is called the equivalence principle in general relativity - gravitational and inertial mass are interchangeable. Since time is dilated by increasing speeds this is almost like the object is building a field of gravity around itself as it gets closer to the speed of light. And since this is inversely proportional to (c - speed of object), as speed of object approaches c, the inertial mass is infinite and you will need infinite energy to accelerate this which breaks the laws of physics. Hence c is the speed limit of the universe.
This guy @Sarvotham Shetty , has also explained well from another point of view. I will just add that c, speed of light need not necessarily be derived from Einstein's equation of e=mc^2. This may add to confusion for many people who are interested in the fundamental way of knowing about the speed of light. Maxwell's equations dealing with permittivity and permeability in free space (vacuum) gives the most fundamental way of understanding the speed of light. This is a more fundamental way of understanding the speed of light. Speed of light could also be looked into through the c as in "Causality". Any event to take place in the Universe across light years away CANNOT happen "instantaneously" but they have to happen after a finite moment of time which is restricted by c, speed of light according to Einstein's theory of relativity under space-time framework of bending time and space being mutually changeable except that time ALWAYS moves Only in forward direction unlike space that can move in positive and negative directions in all three dimensions. With NO causality and NO restriction on speed of light, all other laws of physics simply break down because then it means that any two events can happen simultaneously and then "Time" as we know breaks down. Then, there will be NO before or after. Then, the things that are supposed to happen after a cause will end up happening before the cause itself. This could lead to chaos of our understanding of everything that we know about physics. Just a small caveat of the above. In 2022, this year, physics nobel prize was handed to an experiment that goes against Einstein's understanding of a "deterministic" Universe of simultaneity. The nobel prize showed experiments that there could be an entanglement of two instantaneously produced particles having opposite spins and one can determine the spin of the other particle beyond light years once we determine spin of the first particle, meaning instantaneously, faster than the speed of light. But of course the speed of light for moving particles (and everything else) is STILL INTACT. So the restrictions of speed of light through Maxwell's equations of permittivity and permeability through free space (vacuum) STILL hold and are accepted as true.
Hey Ranveer, can you bring Retrired IAS officer Sanjay Dixit Ji to your podcast. He is 1 of the few Indians who does a Perfect analysis of current Events related to the India. And surprisingly, he also has Answer to every Question related to India and its History. His Expertise lies in Indian History, Partition of India, National Integrity and islamic invasions. Thanks!
All my life I hated studying physics ,also found it the most difficult subject to understand. For first time in life ,felt like physics is extremely interesting and it has all answers . Your knowledge and explanations are so impressive. The school and college text books are to be designed by such intellectuals who know how to convey a subject in a simplest way . Thank you abhijeet chavda and TRS 👍
The mass increases when a particle reaches speed of light as the energy and mass are inter convertible, so energy converts into mass increasing the mass
Its the energy not mass, specifically speaking its the Kinetic energy, its proportional to v^2, which is why it assumed to be massive at light speeds but its actually its kinetic energy which is high
Big Bang followed by Big crunch. Cycles of big bangs and big crunchs Expansion and contraction of universes through eternity. Sounds like bhagavat Gita philosophy. Carl Sagan the great astro physicist had also supported this big bang theory. he also stated that modern cosmology is more compatible with Hindu cosmic time scales.
@@JoshvaAdventures And that's exactly why big freeze will happen. Dark energy is now the dominant force so the expansion of universe will forever go on because matter is limited but expansion is not. Gravity of matter will not be able to overcome expansion or slow it down. Universe has few trillion years worth of light and energy in form of matter. There will be pitch dark and cold after that and the universe will keep on expanding with even increasing speed.
@@6pac. in the cosmos series great astro physicist put forward these theories on cosmic dissolution. Big freeze is also favoured by Carl Sagan and possible outcome of universal dissolution.his series "cosmos"is an eye opener and inspiring .hope u also watched. Thanks for ur response friend😀
@@6pac. but still how can you explain what was before big freeze? Its just like we can’t explain what was the first homo sapien because we evolved from neanderthals bit by bit and mutations caused us to completely turn into a new species
If you calculate birth time of universe based on expansion speed of other galaxy .... I think the problem would be our galaxy is also moving along with other galaxy so it will be more of relative speed comaparison.... So how would we know whats the birth time of universe... It's more like two cars are moving and we are trying to compare the start point based on how fast we are moving in comparison of other ..... I might be wrong here.... I am not the expert just the thought while watching it
I think your assumption is wrong here. Let me explain what the expansion of the universe means. Expansion means that the space present across the universe is itself expanding. So even in Andromeda will collide with us, at a certain point in time in the future, even the space between the atoms in our body will get expanded to a level that we will not be able to exist. So, it is not the relative speed that you measure, but the expansion acceleration of the spacetime itself. Using that value and assuming the acceleration to be constant, astrophysicists determine the age of the universe. Let me know if it helps!!
There is no increase in mass when something approaches the speed of light. It is a concept of relativistic mass in which mass is multiplied by the gamma function (present in theory of relativity of E=MC^2). Mass does NOT increase or does NOT become infinite at the speed of light. Bottom line: actual mass is NOT equal to relativistic mass.
You did not get it. The people who propose the Big Bang theory, say that "Space" itself was created at the point when the big bang started. So according to them there is "NOTHING" outside of this creation of space that the created "Space" could actually propagate into. And According to them, this "NOTHING" does NOT mean empty space. Remember empty space is being created by the Big Bang itself within the confines of the Universe. Hence According to the Big Bang theory, the question of asking about "NOTHING" outside the created "space" is meaningless. Exactly in the same way according to the big bang theory asking a question what was before big bang is also meaningless because according to the theory there was NO "time or space or spacetime" hence there was NO "before" the big bang. Hence According to the theory there is also NO specific central point of propagation either because, remember, there was NO "space" to begin with. According to the theory "Space" itself started to be created with the beginning of the big bang.
@@katakuri9189 There is NO definition of that point in dimension. For verbal reasons the point is described as "Infinitesimally" small but there is NO physical definition of that smallness of point hence NO attribution of dimensions to it. Remember there was supposed to be a "Cosmic inflation" starting from sometime 10^(-36) seconds to 10^(-15) seconds or so of the magnitude of billions of light years across with the creation of space.
Nope mass change can be expressed as mass change = Lorentz factor x rest mass. Since the rest mass of a photon (light particle) is zero, mass change will also be equal to 0 so there is no infinite mass.
There is no increase in mass when something approaches the speed of light. It is a concept of relativistic mass in which mass is multiplied by the gamma function or Lorentz factor (present in theory of relativity of E=MC^2). Mass does NOT increase or does NOT become infinite at the speed of light. Bottom line: actual mass is NOT equal to relativistic mass.
Light particles are said to be "Massless" for all practical purposes but they cannot be said to have 0 mass. There is a problem with attributing zero to mass in absolute terms.
The reason why mass gets heavier and heavier as it approaches light speed is explained beautifully by this amazing equation which everyone is familer with. It's E=mc squared. If you rearrange the equation you get c squared = E/m. Now we all know speed of light is constant which means, when you keep increasing the energy, the mass increases as well to keep the resulting ratio of E/m equal to c squared. Secondly even now the space-time itself is expanding faster than speed of light and , which means we are in some way travelling faster than light. And thirdly it's not impossible to break universal speed limit, all we need is some negative energy which I know is purely Theorital, but if we have access to, we can go faster than light without breaking a sweat!!
An intuitive way to understand this is to first understand that acceleration and mass (gravitational mass) are interchangeable. This is counter-intuitive at first. But think what happens when you go close to a large body with immense gravity (like a black hole) - time slows down. Time dilation also happens as you approach the speed of light. Like two sides of an equation, this is called the equivalence principle in general relativity - gravitational and inertial mass are interchangeable. Since time is dilated by increasing speeds this is almost like the object is building a field of gravity around itself as it gets closer to the speed of light (intuitively speaking). And since this inertial mass is inversely proportional to (1 - speed of object^2 / c^2), if speed of object becomes c, the inertial mass is infinite and you will need infinite energy to accelerate this which breaks the laws of physics. Hence c, the speed of light is the speed limit of the universe.
Relativistic mass becomes infinite because, relativistic mass = Lorentz factor × rest-mass, now lorentz factor[1/√(1-v/c)] becomes infinity when velocity of the mass is equal to light velocity. Cause v/c=1. So 1-v/c = 0 now square root of 0 is also 0. So, 1/0=0. If you are running with the speed of light with respect to me, you yourself will feel you are at rest mass. But, with respect to me your relative mass will become infinite.
Keep in mind that these Red Shifts are only recognisable till the edge of observable universe. The rest of the universe is said to be about 30 to 250 times larger. We very well might be a much older universe sitting in the 51st Bhrama Year. That'd be around 160 trillion years as of now.
@@shreyangshumodak8923 Bhramha lives for 100 Bhrama years. 100 Bhrama years = 311.04 trillion human years. The age of universe is 100 Bhrama years. The time in Bhrama Lok flows much slower than us as Bhrama Lok is a different dimension.
Big bang or singularity cannot be a small single point because to have a single point you need to have outer space in reference to that... To point out a single point..... The universe has no beginning nor end... It existed forever and ever....
मुझे नहीं पता यह ब्रह्मांड कैसे बना है मगर हम सब उसे एक जगह से आया और वह एक जगह कहां से आई वह एक कहां से आया एक और शून्य से पहले क्या था मुझे लगता है यह सब जानने की कोई जरूरत नहीं है क्योंकि इस जाना नहीं जा सकता है यह बहुत ही उलझी हुई पहली है इसे समझ पाना कठिन है
Cosmic inflation is a recent theory created to explain the uniformity of temperature in the "observed" flatter (almost flat) Universe. There are many criticisms of this (epoch) inflation theory. It is not a topic of discussion but people should understand that cosmic inflation theory stands on a very, very weak foundation.
@@LOL-pb2if In a way, right. But not exactly, because this is still the best overall theory that could explain many visible and observed phenomena. But you are right we should NOT consider this theory to be wholly correct and the ONLY one theory that explains the observable universe. For beginners, the quantum theory is completely out of sync at the molecular levels with the big bang theory. The big bang theory cannot explain molecular behavior at all. But more importantly there are other concepts such as string theory that tries to explain alternative origins of the universe.
@@vish206 big bang happened 13.8 billion years ago, we know this since the past 10 years or more, I'm pretty sure it adds up to 23 billion years as 13+10=23. How come 14? Get your maths checked bro. 😢😅
@@diwasbisht8290 yeah every year this needs to change as we are moving ahead in time. This is like saying India got independence before 70 years all your life because you learnt this in school.
Jesus is the Alpha and the Omega, the beginning and the end. He was before big bang and He will be after everything else crumbles. Now who made God? Let's ask God. How you may ask? Pray to Jesus wholeheartedly.
@@prophetsins7490 I’ll make it simple, how can you say that there was a big bang when the poorest type of insulator is outer space because there is nothing space to insulate the heat, and this is the reason why stars do not form naturally. And the other reason why a big bang could not have occurred is because no amount of gravity can pull all matter into one infinitesimal region by any stretch of the imagination because the pressures exerting outward are thousands of times greater than the gravity pulling the matter in...Think?
@@prophetsins7490 maybe next time you’ll think before making idiotic posts in the YT comments section..but hey keep trying, maybe one day you’ll post something intelligent. Cheers big ears.😊
What about multiverse recently propounded by scientists! There are many Universe beyond ours. "TIME" EXISTED BEFORE OUR PERCEPTION OF TIME OR WHAT PERCEPTED BY SCIENTISTS! TIME IS GOD OR GOD IS TIME!
wait, Abhijit ji - it is proven that is more anti-matter or dark energy/matter than normal/positive matter/energy in the universe and that's where the balance in universe theory breaks, I really need more info or discussion on this topic i guess with you
The scientists themselves are struggling with the 5% visible mass hence they introduced this theoretical concept of dark matter. And they are struggling with the expansion (red shift at an accelerated velocity) hence they introduced the theoretical concept of dark energy. They are trying to carry out experiments and observations to find "Dark matter" and "Dark energy" but so far there isn't any clue.
Cosmic inflation is a recent theory created to explain the uniformity of temperature in the "observed" flatter (almost flat) Universe. There are many criticisms of this (epoch) inflation theory. It is not a topic of discussion but people should understand that cosmic inflation theory stands on a very, very weak foundation.
The cosmic inflation was supposed to take place just initially after 10^(-36) to 10^(-15) seconds or so of the magnitude of billions of light years across in that time.
3:07 This is exactly what Shakthism says. In the beginning there was only AdiParashakthi(Energy) She created brahma vishnu and mahesh (protons, neutrons and electrons) Devi is the ultimate truth 🙏 Jai mata di🙏
@@Bhuvanfirebaba higgs boson is nothing but shiva😂 and universal consciousness is nothing but shivas mind.. and he is beyond space and time.. singularity before expansion then contraction will happen leading to shivas cosmic dance.. huh do some research on your own.. the dance of subatomic particle is the energy dance of shiva..
I have better explanation Imagine u meditating u will start seeing small dot of certain color.. more u go deep in meditation that spot start increasing in volume
Big bang theory was wrong,,,, real reference point is balckholes (shiva linga naatraja) this was from billions years, we are from billions years to till now
Sir you are mistaken fundamentals of physics because you told that if anything want to travel with the speed of light it will have infinite mass But in reality if something want to travel with the speed of light it must be massless for example photos are the fundamental particles of light and they are massless So please don't talk these nonsense laws 🙏🏻
😐🤔🤐🤫😆🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 😶😶😶 Anyone believing this nonsense is just as likely to believe in God. It was neither. No big bang, no god. Accept the fact that we are because we were created by other life forms long before us and the subsequent will happen with other life that we create and manipulate when and after we are wiped out, beit by our own doing or the cycle of the cosmos..... Enjoy and help enjoy to fulfill what life we are given
Check out my Meditation app: Level SuperMind
Get Android - bit.ly/AndroidApp_Link
Get iOS - apple.co/3SyiPcE
Know more about Level :
bit.ly/levellinktree
youtuber Jason silver And u awesome sir🇧🇷🇧🇷💚💚💚💚🌳🌳🙏🙏🙏🤠
Idk how to say it but Abhijit Chavda is a genius, dude has knowledge in every single thing from science, politics, history etc. Respect+++
Lol no, the Big Bang is an impossibility
As he should and everyone else
I think he prepare and come.. it's very hard to remember all the things .. and he is correct everytime
He is talking nonsense please check fundamentals of physics 😒
@@namandeepekka5623 no, he is literally wrong about everything..everything
Abhijeet chavda never disappoints :)
Time is cyclical, no beginning no ending... Before the time also need time
Had goosebumps listening to abhijit sir. Wow universe is so easy yet too damn complex to understand.
Bhai chavda sir toh har koi topic pe baat karte hai. Politics, history, geography, since, particle since now astrophysics. Sahi hai.
Following these channel was the best decision in my life. My life has changed a lotttttt or more I say my perspectives. The knowledge we get through your every video is just incredible........love from Bengal❤️❤️
It really popped up to me 4secs ago
2:32 ☺️ It made me little happy when he was explaining how object moves it increases mass which I just study yesterday
(Class 12 physics chapter nuclei)
There is no increase in mass when something approaches the speed of light. It is a concept of relativistic mass in which mass is multiplied by the gamma function (present in theory of relativity of E=MC^2). Mass does NOT increase or does NOT become infinite at the speed of light.
Bottom line: actual mass is NOT equal to relativistic mass.
Don't take your education from these guys. They don't know about cosmic issues or physics. Relativistic mass is a childish way of trying to make young children to be introduced to the theory of relativity. Mass does NOT increase with increase in speed while approaching the speed of light.
It is not really increasing its mass. A simple way to understand this to first understand that acceleration and mass are interchangeable. This is counter-intuitive at first. But think what happens when you go close to a large body with immense gravity - time slows down. Time dilation also happens as you approach the speed of light. Like two sides of an equation, this is called the equivalence principle in general relativity - gravitational and inertial mass are interchangeable. Since time is dilated by increasing speeds this is almost like the object is building a field of gravity around itself as it gets closer to the speed of light. And since this is inversely proportional to (c - speed of object), as speed of object approaches c, the inertial mass is infinite and you will need infinite energy to accelerate this which breaks the laws of physics. Hence c is the speed limit of the universe.
This guy @Sarvotham Shetty , has also explained well from another point of view. I will just add that c, speed of light need not necessarily be derived from Einstein's equation of e=mc^2. This may add to confusion for many people who are interested in the fundamental way of knowing about the speed of light.
Maxwell's equations dealing with permittivity and permeability in free space (vacuum) gives the most fundamental way of understanding the speed of light. This is a more fundamental way of understanding the speed of light.
Speed of light could also be looked into through the c as in "Causality". Any event to take place in the Universe across light years away CANNOT happen "instantaneously" but they have to happen after a finite moment of time which is restricted by c, speed of light according to Einstein's theory of relativity under space-time framework of bending time and space being mutually changeable except that time ALWAYS moves Only in forward direction unlike space that can move in positive and negative directions in all three dimensions. With NO causality and NO restriction on speed of light, all other laws of physics simply break down because then it means that any two events can happen simultaneously and then "Time" as we know breaks down. Then, there will be NO before or after. Then, the things that are supposed to happen after a cause will end up happening before the cause itself. This could lead to chaos of our understanding of everything that we know about physics.
Just a small caveat of the above. In 2022, this year, physics nobel prize was handed to an experiment that goes against Einstein's understanding of a "deterministic" Universe of simultaneity. The nobel prize showed experiments that there could be an entanglement of two instantaneously produced particles having opposite spins and one can determine the spin of the other particle beyond light years once we determine spin of the first particle, meaning instantaneously, faster than the speed of light.
But of course the speed of light for moving particles (and everything else) is STILL INTACT.
So the restrictions of speed of light through Maxwell's equations of permittivity and permeability through free space (vacuum) STILL hold and are accepted as true.
Hey Ranveer, can you bring Retrired IAS officer Sanjay Dixit Ji to your podcast. He is 1 of the few Indians who does a Perfect analysis of current Events related to the India. And surprisingly, he also has Answer to every Question related to India and its History. His Expertise lies in Indian History, Partition of India, National Integrity and islamic invasions. Thanks!
So basically you need an UPSC lecture 😂, go take classes buddy.
All my life I hated studying physics ,also found it the most difficult subject to understand. For first time in life ,felt like physics is extremely interesting and it has all answers .
Your knowledge and explanations are so impressive.
The school and college text books are to be designed by such intellectuals who know how to convey a subject in a simplest way .
Thank you abhijeet chavda and TRS 👍
popular science always feels easy and interesting to understand.
If you don't like physics you're probably studying from a bad teacher dude
The mass increases when a particle reaches speed of light as the energy and mass are inter convertible, so energy converts into mass increasing the mass
love from west bengal calcutta
You understand the mind really well..
He is only talking about the things which humans think they know but the truth is the more any human knows the less intelligence they become..
The shape of the universe is similar to a lingam.
😂😂
@@pamtam1actually its not standing on pillars as bullah told😂😂😂
Stars must be bigger to see in ancient times
Its the energy not mass, specifically speaking its the Kinetic energy, its proportional to v^2, which is why it assumed to be massive at light speeds but its actually its kinetic energy which is high
Big Bang followed by Big crunch. Cycles of big bangs and big crunchs Expansion and contraction of universes through eternity. Sounds like bhagavat Gita philosophy. Carl Sagan the great astro physicist had also supported this big bang theory. he also stated that modern cosmology is more compatible with Hindu cosmic time scales.
Big crunch is highly unlikely and is an old rejected Theory. Big freeze is the most possible way we're going to go out.
@@6pac. what ever be the theories, the fate of the Universe depend on this mysterious Dark energy phenomenon which constitutes much of the universe.
@@JoshvaAdventures And that's exactly why big freeze will happen. Dark energy is now the dominant force so the expansion of universe will forever go on because matter is limited but expansion is not. Gravity of matter will not be able to overcome expansion or slow it down. Universe has few trillion years worth of light and energy in form of matter. There will be pitch dark and cold after that and the universe will keep on expanding with even increasing speed.
@@6pac. in the cosmos series great astro physicist put forward these theories on cosmic dissolution. Big freeze is also favoured by Carl Sagan and possible outcome of universal dissolution.his series "cosmos"is an eye opener and inspiring .hope u also watched. Thanks for ur response friend😀
@@6pac. but still how can you explain what was before big freeze? Its just like we can’t explain what was the first homo sapien because we evolved from neanderthals bit by bit and mutations caused us to completely turn into a new species
Even before what was there at the beginning and what is base for creation of light ????
I'm shook💫🌟😄😀. This is.................. WOW👌
Are the galaxies moving further away from us or is our planet moving further away from the galaxies?
According to Vedas the universe is 155 trillion years old.
Man that was amazing!
Awesome 👌🏻👌🏻👌🏻
visible light
perfect mysterious frequency Create multiple un?verse. nanosecond, microsecond and All mystical second together created multiple un?verse
If you calculate birth time of universe based on expansion speed of other galaxy .... I think the problem would be our galaxy is also moving along with other galaxy so it will be more of relative speed comaparison.... So how would we know whats the birth time of universe... It's more like two cars are moving and we are trying to compare the start point based on how fast we are moving in comparison of other
..... I might be wrong here.... I am not the expert just the thought while watching it
I think your assumption is wrong here. Let me explain what the expansion of the universe means. Expansion means that the space present across the universe is itself expanding. So even in Andromeda will collide with us, at a certain point in time in the future, even the space between the atoms in our body will get expanded to a level that we will not be able to exist. So, it is not the relative speed that you measure, but the expansion acceleration of the spacetime itself. Using that value and assuming the acceleration to be constant, astrophysicists determine the age of the universe. Let me know if it helps!!
@@sandipanborthakur8637 Thanks Buddy.... That make sense...
That Light Which Was Non Visible but there is known as God in multiple religions.
So informative
From where came the protons ?
There is no increase in mass when something approaches the speed of light. It is a concept of relativistic mass in which mass is multiplied by the gamma function (present in theory of relativity of E=MC^2). Mass does NOT increase or does NOT become infinite at the speed of light.
Bottom line: actual mass is NOT equal to relativistic mass.
He was likely referring to inertial mass which will increase due to the gamma function.
Sir If Big-bang is started from a point even that point need a empty space how it came into existence before Big Bang sir if u can tell us thanks???..
A point is dimension less
it has 0 length 0 volume.
You did not get it. The people who propose the Big Bang theory, say that "Space" itself was created at the point when the big bang started. So according to them there is "NOTHING" outside of this creation of space that the created "Space" could actually propagate into. And According to them, this "NOTHING" does NOT mean empty space. Remember empty space is being created by the Big Bang itself within the confines of the Universe. Hence According to the Big Bang theory, the question of asking about "NOTHING" outside the created "space" is meaningless. Exactly in the same way according to the big bang theory asking a question what was before big bang is also meaningless because according to the theory there was NO "time or space or spacetime" hence there was NO "before" the big bang.
Hence According to the theory there is also NO specific central point of propagation either because, remember, there was NO "space" to begin with. According to the theory "Space" itself started to be created with the beginning of the big bang.
@@katakuri9189 There is NO definition of that point in dimension. For verbal reasons the point is described as "Infinitesimally" small but there is NO physical definition of that smallness of point hence NO attribution of dimensions to it. Remember there was supposed to be a "Cosmic inflation" starting from sometime 10^(-36) seconds to 10^(-15) seconds or so of the magnitude of billions of light years across with the creation of space.
I thought the age of the universe was calculated using the cosmic microwave background radiation
How can one understand or explain something when thier is no time ? I mean if there is no time how any event can happens ?
Before you put such complex questionnaire to chavda sir.....
You should provide him with white board...black marker... And duster.... Ranvee
cosmic radio wave backgroud
Other for search
Infinite mass?? Light particles have infinite mass?? 🤔 little bit confused..
Can anybody explain this? Plz??
In the context of matter.
Nope mass change can be expressed as mass change = Lorentz factor x rest mass. Since the rest mass of a photon (light particle) is zero, mass change will also be equal to 0 so there is no infinite mass.
Could refer any video plz?
There is no increase in mass when something approaches the speed of light. It is a concept of relativistic mass in which mass is multiplied by the gamma function or Lorentz factor (present in theory of relativity of E=MC^2). Mass does NOT increase or does NOT become infinite at the speed of light.
Bottom line: actual mass is NOT equal to relativistic mass.
Light particles are said to be "Massless" for all practical purposes but they cannot be said to have 0 mass. There is a problem with attributing zero to mass in absolute terms.
The reason why mass gets heavier and heavier as it approaches light speed is explained beautifully by this amazing equation which everyone is familer with. It's E=mc squared. If you rearrange the equation you get c squared = E/m. Now we all know speed of light is constant which means, when you keep increasing the energy, the mass increases as well to keep the resulting ratio of E/m equal to c squared. Secondly even now the space-time itself is expanding faster than speed of light and , which means we are in some way travelling faster than light. And thirdly it's not impossible to break universal speed limit, all we need is some negative energy which I know is purely Theorital, but if we have access to, we can go faster than light without breaking a sweat!!
An intuitive way to understand this is to first understand that acceleration and mass (gravitational mass) are interchangeable. This is counter-intuitive at first. But think what happens when you go close to a large body with immense gravity (like a black hole) - time slows down. Time dilation also happens as you approach the speed of light. Like two sides of an equation, this is called the equivalence principle in general relativity - gravitational and inertial mass are interchangeable. Since time is dilated by increasing speeds this is almost like the object is building a field of gravity around itself as it gets closer to the speed of light (intuitively speaking). And since this inertial mass is inversely proportional to (1 - speed of object^2 / c^2), if speed of object becomes c, the inertial mass is infinite and you will need infinite energy to accelerate this which breaks the laws of physics. Hence c, the speed of light is the speed limit of the universe.
No one can explain what was before Big Bang. Everyone just tries to manipulate i don't know into other words.
Neil Degrasse Tyson of India 🇮🇳
Relativistic mass becomes infinite because, relativistic mass = Lorentz factor × rest-mass, now lorentz factor[1/√(1-v/c)] becomes infinity when velocity of the mass is equal to light velocity. Cause v/c=1. So 1-v/c = 0 now square root of 0 is also 0. So, 1/0=0.
If you are running with the speed of light with respect to me, you yourself will feel you are at rest mass. But, with respect to me your relative mass will become infinite.
That means if i will watch a photon moving with c... Then according to me It's mass will be infinite?
@@chiranjibipadhee7309 hey no, photon's rest mass is zero.
Keep in mind that these Red Shifts are only recognisable till the edge of observable universe. The rest of the universe is said to be about 30 to 250 times larger. We very well might be a much older universe sitting in the 51st Bhrama Year. That'd be around 160 trillion years as of now.
Explain in the comments please
@@shreyangshumodak8923 What do you want to know friend?
@@6pac. what is a Brahma year for starters?
@@shreyangshumodak8923 Bhramha lives for 100 Bhrama years.
100 Bhrama years = 311.04 trillion human years.
The age of universe is 100 Bhrama years.
The time in Bhrama Lok flows much slower than us as Bhrama Lok is a different dimension.
@@6pac. what happens after the 100th Brahma year?
Big bang or singularity cannot be a small single point because to have a single point you need to have outer space in reference to that... To point out a single point..... The universe has no beginning nor end... It existed forever and ever....
Where’s the answer? He didn’t discuss Singularity
Speed= mass * velocity
It was more like a viva 😅
how can andromeda galaxy will merge with milky way ? milky way is also expanding or going further at same rate that of andromeda galaxy.
Gravity
bhaisaab i know noting
मुझे नहीं पता यह ब्रह्मांड कैसे बना है मगर हम सब उसे एक जगह से आया और वह एक जगह कहां से आई वह एक कहां से आया एक और शून्य से पहले क्या था मुझे लगता है यह सब जानने की कोई जरूरत नहीं है क्योंकि इस जाना नहीं जा सकता है यह बहुत ही उलझी हुई पहली है इसे समझ पाना कठिन है
Latest research is now showing that there might not have been any big bang ! .... 🙂 ....
I thought infinite speed is achieved at 0 mass no?. The ray of light is 0 mass right?
Cosmic inflation is a recent theory created to explain the uniformity of temperature in the "observed" flatter (almost flat) Universe. There are many criticisms of this (epoch) inflation theory.
It is not a topic of discussion but people should understand that cosmic inflation theory stands on a very, very weak foundation.
I think Coin can give an idea to know whether its flat or circle😂😂
Wrong.
Time, space, energy, matter all started from Big Bang.
The big bang itself is a hypothesis,which happens to be so popular that we assume that the components of big bang theory actually happened
@@LOL-pb2if In a way, right. But not exactly, because this is still the best overall theory that could explain many visible and observed phenomena. But you are right we should NOT consider this theory to be wholly correct and the ONLY one theory that explains the observable universe.
For beginners, the quantum theory is completely out of sync at the molecular levels with the big bang theory. The big bang theory cannot explain molecular behavior at all.
But more importantly there are other concepts such as string theory that tries to explain alternative origins of the universe.
Big bang theory is only theory only word , no equation no calculation 😂
I need pictures
I thought 13.8 billion years ago was around 1 year ago , now it should not be 14 billion years ago?
14-13.8 = 0.2 billion years. How can the age of the universe be changed by 0.2 billion years in 1 year?
@@sandipanborthakur8637 was just joking
@@vish206 Okay. Didn't seem like that, but sure.
@@vish206 big bang happened 13.8 billion years ago, we know this since the past 10 years or more, I'm pretty sure it adds up to 23 billion years as 13+10=23. How come 14? Get your maths checked bro. 😢😅
@@diwasbisht8290 yeah every year this needs to change as we are moving ahead in time. This is like saying India got independence before 70 years all your life because you learnt this in school.
Jesus is the Alpha and the Omega, the beginning and the end.
He was before big bang and He will be after everything else crumbles.
Now who made God? Let's ask God. How you may ask?
Pray to Jesus wholeheartedly.
Put aside Bible and pick up the 10th class physics book and have some real knowledge.
The Big Bang is an impossibility..cannot believe people still “tRuSt tHe ScIenCe”😅
You must be a christian or a Muslim who believes god created sun on 3rd day.
@@prophetsins7490 I’ll make it simple, how can you say that there was a big bang when the poorest type of insulator is outer space because there is nothing space to insulate the heat, and this is the reason why stars do not form naturally. And the other reason why a big bang could not have occurred is because no amount of gravity can pull all matter into one infinitesimal region by any stretch of the imagination because the pressures exerting outward are thousands of times greater than the gravity pulling the matter in...Think?
@@paulk9188
Nonsense 🤣🤣🤣
@@prophetsins7490 So you have no understanding of basic physics..why didn’t you just say so?
@@prophetsins7490 maybe next time you’ll think before making idiotic posts in the YT comments section..but hey keep trying, maybe one day you’ll post something intelligent. Cheers big ears.😊
What about multiverse recently propounded by scientists! There are many Universe beyond ours. "TIME" EXISTED BEFORE OUR PERCEPTION OF TIME OR WHAT PERCEPTED BY SCIENTISTS! TIME IS GOD OR GOD IS TIME!
Mere tuition teacher ban jao🙏🙏
😊
Don't just keep on asking questions yar...involve yourself bhai
you are like the Indian version of Joe Rogan
Rigved big bang ke science ko bataya hai jisko Hiranyagarbh ke naam se jaante hai jaake check kar lp
wait, Abhijit ji - it is proven that is more anti-matter or dark energy/matter than normal/positive matter/energy in the universe and that's where the balance in universe theory breaks, I really need more info or discussion on this topic i guess with you
and how you can compare inflation with the current speed of galaxies getting away from each other.
The scientists themselves are struggling with the 5% visible mass hence they introduced this theoretical concept of dark matter. And they are struggling with the expansion (red shift at an accelerated velocity) hence they introduced the theoretical concept of dark energy.
They are trying to carry out experiments and observations to find "Dark matter" and "Dark energy" but so far there isn't any clue.
Cosmic inflation is a recent theory created to explain the uniformity of temperature in the "observed" flatter (almost flat) Universe. There are many criticisms of this (epoch) inflation theory.
It is not a topic of discussion but people should understand that cosmic inflation theory stands on a very, very weak foundation.
The cosmic inflation was supposed to take place just initially after 10^(-36) to 10^(-15) seconds or so of the magnitude of billions of light years across in that time.
Abhijit chadwa be like.. mujhe sab ata hai mai bhut expert hoon isme
Books be like let me read Abhijit chawda sir.
3:07
This is exactly what Shakthism says.
In the beginning there was only AdiParashakthi(Energy)
She created brahma vishnu and mahesh (protons, neutrons and electrons)
Devi is the ultimate truth 🙏
Jai mata di🙏
Pseudoscience POLICE 😅😅
@@Bhuvanfirejoker that gravity dance is shivas cosmic dance😂 aise he usko cern laboratory main nhi leke gayein
@@siddarthshah1773 yes you are correct Shiva and Shakti performed a Bollywood item dance in space time continuum
@@Bhuvanfirebaba higgs boson is nothing but shiva😂 and universal consciousness is nothing but shivas mind.. and he is beyond space and time.. singularity before expansion then contraction will happen leading to shivas cosmic dance.. huh do some research on your own.. the dance of subatomic particle is the energy dance of shiva..
Awadh ojha sir ko laye
I have better explanation
Imagine u meditating u will start seeing small dot of certain color.. more u go deep in meditation that spot start increasing in volume
Ranveer you really need some research before asking these silly questions. Because it's not your physics class.
Big bang theory was wrong,,,, real reference point is balckholes (shiva linga naatraja) this was from billions years, we are from billions years to till now
🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰😃😃😃😃
this scientist even does know what he had ate in last two week and he is telling story happened before 5 crore years 😆😆
21
Sir you are mistaken fundamentals of physics because you told that if anything want to travel with the speed of light it will have infinite mass
But in reality if something want to travel with the speed of light it must be massless for example photos are the fundamental particles of light and they are massless
So please don't talk these nonsense laws 🙏🏻
Bro kuch bhi bolte ho yaar earn krne ke liye
Kya inko hindi nhi aati
Bhai kabhi tum log bhi kuch khoj lo ki bas dusro ki khoj pe Gyan do ge
Tu kar na dost tujhe kisne roka hai ?
Mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
😐🤔🤐🤫😆🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
😶😶😶
Anyone believing this nonsense is just as likely to believe in God.
It was neither.
No big bang, no god.
Accept the fact that we are because we were created by other life forms long before us and the subsequent will happen with other life that we create and manipulate when and after we are wiped out, beit by our own doing or the cycle of the cosmos.....
Enjoy and help enjoy to fulfill what life we are given
😂😂😂😂😂 lot's of logical fallacy here just word salad nothing backed by mathematical model just time pass 😂😂😂🤣 bewakoof log
Can u bring rajesh the facttecz guy he tells everything abt any topic can u check out his channel and then please try to contact him