@@devilsolution9781The west has China and Russia to worry about now, those are bigger threats to western interests/dominance Get distracted in Iran at your own peril
@@quacklesuh The point is not to use them. Nukes are a deterent. If today Israel attacks Iran, Iran can't retaliate fully because Israel has nukes. Infact Israel has attacked Iran in the last year.
No, Because with that argument? all Nations could/would have nuclear Weapons. That would greatly increase the chance/risk for a Nuclear War. That very easy could have dire consequence for all People on Earth (if we dont get WW3 and all would die). So there is a very Good reason to limit the Number of Nuclear Stats to as Few as Possible. Thats why USA has agreeded to Protect countrys like Nato,Japan,Australia,Taiwan,S Korea,Philippines and others with Nuclear Weapons if necessary, So They dont have to develup thire Own Nuclear Weapons.
terrorism or acting completely violence without control that's why. some countries still have extremists. They dont care much about the consequence and sooner or later getting vaporized together with their country.
@@sethjoseph4382 You mean those who threw two A-bombs on Japan, supported Islamists in Afghanistan, invaded Iraq, destroyed Libya and Syria... Those people...
No, Because with that argument? all Nations could/would have nuclear Weapons. That would greatly increase the chance/risk for a Nuclear War. That very easy could have dire consequence for all People on Earth (if we dont get WW3 and all would die). So there is a very Good reason to limit the Number of Nuclear Stats to as Few as Possible. Thats why USA has agreeded to Protect countrys like Nato,Japan,Australia,Taiwan,S Korea,Philippines and others with Nuclear Weapons if necessary, So They dont have to develup thire Own Nuclear Weapons.
No, Because with that argument? all Nations could/would have nuclear Weapons. That would greatly increase the chance/risk for a Nuclear War. That very easy could have dire consequence for all People on Earth (if we dont get WW3 and all would die). So there is a very Good reason to limit the Number of Nuclear Stats to as Few as Possible. Thats why USA has agreeded to Protect countrys like Nato,Japan,Australia,Taiwan,S Korea,Philippines and others with Nuclear Weapons if necessary, So They dont have to develup thire Own Nuclear Weapons.
Russia has the right to protect itself. Ukraine has the right to protect itself. China has the right to support whoever their want. Iran has the right to protect itself. Israel has the right to protect itself. USA has the right to support whoever they want. If something wrong with my statement, pls remind me of the "Free world" definition. It's supposed to be free for everyone, not just the chosen ones, right?
So you're saying the majority of the US ppls want war? Like Nam? The DEEPSTATE is not indicative of a democracy I don't think a free nation would have a seatbelt law, or classify the JFK assassination for 75 years. Do you know what a controlled demolition looks like?
Right means nothing in international politics, because international politics are in the "state of nature" (see Hobbs). That means "might is right". That's just the truth and always has been, everything else is veneer.
BUT iran is run by fanatics, and is unstable. From the creatures of Hezbullah + Hamas + Iraqi resistances, do you really wanna give those mofos more power ? to an unstable country that will soon be thrown by its own people ?
Do the Western nations and Senor Grossi show any concern about Israel's nuclear programme? or is it only Iran that they want to investigate for developing nuclear weapons?
You talk about monitoring Iran's nuclear program. I like to ask you, who monitors the nuclear programs of the superpowers to prevent them from building Nuclear bombs?
You should tell what you are telling Iran to the superpowers, but it is always the same story that the rest of the nations can't build nuclear bombs only the superpowers can do nuclear bombs and can have them.
This dude was being kind of absurdly diplomatic. The Iranian stance that it's a peaceful nuclear program falls flat on its face from even casual observation.
As with any diplomat's statement, it can be interpreted. "We have no intention to build nuclear weapons" is the face-value statement and may, or may not, be true. However, if one were to have a stockpile of nuclear weapons components, one might easily assemble the weapons in a hurry. Every nation that has innovative weapons systems has fibbed a bit.
I hope you will go and visit Israel's nuclear site as well to see and tell us their nuclear statues otherwise you are just pulling Iran down for nothing
At this point it seems to me that both Iran and Israel are some seriously bad countries, however only one is seen as such by the Western media. It's easy to be deluded into thinking that one people are inferior and need to be taken out. Look at Germany in the 30s and then at us + Israel nowadays. Meanwhile, Iran's fundamentalism is also contemptable.
You should be grateful that Iran is still signitory to the NPT. When will you start inspecton Dimona and Israels nuclear weapons? Double standards as usual!
You can not change the way dictators want things to be done unless there's a forceful means that overwhelms them to helplessness. Museveni in Uganda also has been developing nuclear weapons secretly with NK
Why do several countries have to get nuclear weapons? Is there any reasonable logic to this? Any countries have the right to have nuclear weapons for their defense.
We can have but you cant? Why US/Israel do not accept nuclear weapon free middle East? "Israel asserts that states in the Middle East must establish peaceful relations before negotiations on a Middle East Nuclear Weapons Free Zone can begin"
Grossi has investigated Israel nuclear sites & has confirmed that nuclear proliferation has not taken place in Middle East region via Israel. He has attested that Israel has not developed a bomb. So it is important that Iran too should stay within non proliferation treaty and should not be developing a bomb.. out of fear from an Israeli bomb.
If i remember the former Iranian foreign ministry's interview on cnn when a deal happened, he meant to the journalist that moment, like you can verify our nuclear program as many times as you like and we will cooperate 100 percent every time, we have nothing to hide, and we want to be transparent. Yet Trump cancelled the deal to come to this present situation. Once Russia wanted to join NATO, the us said, no,we would like you to be a villain. The cold war ideology is a great threat for climate change you know, but us will never understand. Their autocratic structure won't understand. Military budget receiver won't be able to go to Hawaii if they do so.🤔
@@antlerman7644go read about iran deal. They poured concrete in their nuclear sites. Yet US broke the deal over nothing and sanctioned iran worst than any country in the world.
Quit playing dumb, the west has reveled not to trust them or the security council, Israel has reveled that might is right, all the countries in the world should get nuclear weapons, because either we all get to be independent states free from super powers interventions and bullying or none of us are, and stop acting as if only Iran has extremists, Israel's government is filled with them.
Why UN, not inspected Israel Nuclear site ? Iran have the rights to build Nuclear Weapons and no need permission from anyone. The West worried about Iran Nuclear program, but not about Israel which is very dangerous Regime. God Bless Iran Forever 🇮🇷 Love to Iranians from Senegal 🇸🇳❤ 🌍🙏
So long as Israel has nuclear weapons, other countries in the region see that as a threat; It gives Israel “carte blanche” to pursue aggressive posturing in the region without the threat of any serious retaliation. It’s no wonder other regional players aspire to acquire nuclear weapons!
Israel can certainly be more cooperative about its actual existing nuclear program that it's repeatedly threatened to put into practical use at Gaza and virtually with its neighbors.
You need access to the Iranian nuclear program, but you can't ensure that Iran will get sanction-free. 2015 nuclear deal ensured that Iran would cooperate and WEST would not impose sanctions on Iran, but the US, due to the Israeli lobby, got out of the deal. Why does Iran cooperate?
No, Because with that argument? all Nations could/would have nuclear Weapons. That would greatly increase the chance/risk for a Nuclear War. That very easy could have dire consequence for all People on Earth (if we dont get WW3 and all would die). So there is a very Good reason to limit the Number of Nuclear Stats to as Few as Possible. Thats why USA has agreeded to Protect countrys like Nato,Japan,Australia,Taiwan,S Korea,Philippines and others with Nuclear Weapons if necessary, So They dont have to develup thire Own Nuclear Weapons.
Why USA has lots of Nuclear, israel and UK etc? Why dont u put sanction on israeli nuclear facilities? Or whatever wester do is right but if same thing copied by asian, then why its a big problem for u?
No, Because with that argument? all Nations could/would have nuclear Weapons. That would greatly increase the chance/risk for a Nuclear War. That very easy could have dire consequence for all People on Earth (if we dont get WW3 and all would die). So there is a very Good reason to limit the Number of Nuclear Stats to as Few as Possible. Thats why USA has agreeded to Protect countrys like Nato,Japan,Australia,Taiwan,S Korea,Philippines and others with Nuclear Weapons if necessary, So They dont have to develup thire Own Nuclear Weapons.
Just why should Iran care if Western eyebrows get raised?
I think it cares less. If Israel can have it then why not Iran?
Because, maybe, they have iraq, afghan, syria etc etc in their mind?
Corporating Iran to kill the world?
@@devilsolution9781The west has China and Russia to worry about now, those are bigger threats to western interests/dominance
Get distracted in Iran at your own peril
Massive sanctions and risk of being "freedumh" 'd into a civil war by an intelligence agency of your choosing?
Telling your enemy to put down the gun whilst you’re pointing yours to him?
Iran may soon have the Nuke. Russia and Pakistan may help Iran.
you may be onto something considering whats happened today. they may already have created one.
Why should Israel have nukes to protect itself from Iran and Iran not have nukes to protect itself from Israel?
Because well, double standards
have you literally seen israel using nuclear weapons to protect itself from iran at all?
@@quacklesuh The point is not to use them. Nukes are a deterent. If today Israel attacks Iran, Iran can't retaliate fully because Israel has nukes. Infact Israel has attacked Iran in the last year.
@quacklesuh butvehat matters is they have weapons of mass destruction
@@badge5575 yes and so we should not encourage other countries to develop such weapons so we can decrease our chances of nuclear annihilation
If Israel can have nukes unofficially, or even countries like Pakistan and India, why can't Iran?
No, Because with that argument? all Nations could/would have nuclear Weapons. That would greatly increase the chance/risk for a Nuclear War. That very easy could have dire consequence for all People on Earth (if we dont get WW3 and all would die). So there is a very Good reason to limit the Number of Nuclear Stats to as Few as Possible. Thats why USA has agreeded to Protect countrys like Nato,Japan,Australia,Taiwan,S Korea,Philippines and others with Nuclear Weapons if necessary, So They dont have to develup thire Own Nuclear Weapons.
Why can't ISIS?
@@pithikoulis ISIS isn't a country
@@pithikoulis why not isis ? Because those who have, have done worser than isis
@@kayskreed The government of Iran are the same as ISIS, just different type of crazy Islam.
Why this guy talking about Iran anyway he should be in Israel for inspection
Israel was inspected in the 1960ties. US has an agreement with Israel, and Israel has never Used them (in over 50 years time)
@@mabuhayproductionltd3627 israel have nuk everyone knows western never after israel why they after iran double standard iran not even had any nuk
Only one race has used it, they share same DNA with Israel. The same colonial apartheid that's killing children and oppressing people
@@mabuhayproductionltd3627 But Israel is a threat to the World peace and doesn’t respect the international laws ! So they shouldn’t have Nukes.
Israel never ever allowed IAEA to inspect their sites
If China,Russia,Pakistan,UK,France,USA,Israel,India ,north korea have nukes then Iran has right to have nukes and get free from the sanctions.
They have a right to peaceful nuclear power... Not weapons.
@@Silent_Steel
They have the right to both, like the many countries mentioned in the comment to which you replied...
terrorism or acting completely violence without control that's why. some countries still have extremists. They dont care much about the consequence and sooner or later getting vaporized together with their country.
Nukes are not meant for very unreasonable people.
@@sethjoseph4382
You mean those who threw two A-bombs on Japan, supported Islamists in Afghanistan, invaded Iraq, destroyed Libya and Syria... Those people...
DW News can you also talk about Israeli nukes?
they are a secret
They’re not allowed. 🚫
Nein. Verboten.
@@gbrown9694 not much to talk about, but we know they got them. the history how they go them is online
Nix !!
Israel needs to be more cooperative in revealing & acknowledging their nuclear weapons program.
Why?
Nah
They have an agreement with USA
@@mabuhayproductionltd3627and yet they dont even listen to Usa😂
@@mabuhayproductionltd3627So? How is an agreement with the US relevant?
Iran has the right to have Nuclear weapons … USA has them , Israel has them , why not Iran
No, Because with that argument? all Nations could/would have nuclear Weapons. That would greatly increase the chance/risk for a Nuclear War. That very easy could have dire consequence for all People on Earth (if we dont get WW3 and all would die). So there is a very Good reason to limit the Number of Nuclear Stats to as Few as Possible. Thats why USA has agreeded to Protect countrys like Nato,Japan,Australia,Taiwan,S Korea,Philippines and others with Nuclear Weapons if necessary, So They dont have to develup thire Own Nuclear Weapons.
Right? Just because they back most of the terrorist groups in the Middle East up. Quite unfair, isn't it?
Israel has been claiming that Iran is close to developing nuclear weapons since the 1980s
israel has STOPPED iran from completing a nuke a dozen times in 30 years.. iran will NEVER be allowed to have a nuke.. NEVER
Yes they have sucessfully delayed them for decades (with USA)
They convinced America to flatten Iraq because they had WMDs. Iraq didn't have any. Trust Israel to find a reason to start war.
Same claims were used on Iraq.
@@Ratinevo Yes but Saddam was cleaver, he Used all His WMDs (against Kurds and Iran) before the inspectors came.
Year is 2096... How close is Iran to have an operational nuclear bomb?
Year 2096...... Iran doesn't need nuclear weapons bcoz Israel is no more
@@usamabhatti903 Iran would go First
yes Since from my childhood i heard that Iran is close to a Nuke and till now story didn't change.
@@mabuhayproductionltd3627iran has been there before any other nation exist but israili just yeat ago
@@mdnytc No Iran is a Young state, But Persia has been around for some time. Israel dont want any Iranian soil, just be left in Peace.
He said it’s against International Law to attack a Nuclear facilities but Israel did attack the nuclear facility in Iraq before.
If Israel can have nuclear weapons then definitely Iran has full rights to have nuclear weapons. IRAN HAS THE FULL RIGHTS TO SELF DEFENCE.
That is the first time I hear of nukes being uses for self defence..
@@Tiasung Well , this is what happens when western hypocrisy gets exposed
@@Tiasung you never heard about nuclear deterrent? Or have you been living under a rock?
No, Because with that argument? all Nations could/would have nuclear Weapons. That would greatly increase the chance/risk for a Nuclear War. That very easy could have dire consequence for all People on Earth (if we dont get WW3 and all would die). So there is a very Good reason to limit the Number of Nuclear Stats to as Few as Possible. Thats why USA has agreeded to Protect countrys like Nato,Japan,Australia,Taiwan,S Korea,Philippines and others with Nuclear Weapons if necessary, So They dont have to develup thire Own Nuclear Weapons.
@@Tiasung Nuclear have prevented many wars.
the west is always concerned about Iran 😂.
They don't want them defend themselves, they always want other countries to be weak in defense so that they can attack you at any time
Agree
I wonder why 🤔
@@aigaoliveira3278they only want thier hegemony
Or they don't want religious extremists to have nuclear weapons.
Grossi is Western. So naturally he will be fair and objective and just. Just as West always is.
Why Israel have nuke why not Iran and why they should even listen to West 🖕
Cooperate more!!.... Haaaahaaahaaa.... what a joke!
To have Nuclear weapons is must for every country for their self defence
And Israel shouldn’t cooperate!
This guy is the textbook definition of a bureaucrat only concerned with his job lol
No
He serves the interests of Western powers.
Israel should cooperate more on revealing & acknowledging their own nuclear weapons program.
Unfortunately double standards have rendered IAEA irrelevant.
"Can't be sure Iran is developing nuclear weapons"... ? What kind of fool is this guy?
no confidence in Grossi's assessment of Iran's military nuclear plans. Him having questions is not enough
Russia has the right to protect itself.
Ukraine has the right to protect itself.
China has the right to support whoever their want.
Iran has the right to protect itself.
Israel has the right to protect itself.
USA has the right to support whoever they want.
If something wrong with my statement, pls remind me of the "Free world" definition. It's supposed to be free for everyone, not just the chosen ones, right?
So you're saying the majority of the US ppls want war? Like Nam? The DEEPSTATE is not indicative of a democracy I don't think a free nation would have a seatbelt law, or classify the JFK assassination for 75 years. Do you know what a controlled demolition looks like?
Right means nothing in international politics, because international politics are in the "state of nature" (see Hobbs). That means "might is right". That's just the truth and always has been, everything else is veneer.
BUT iran is run by fanatics, and is unstable. From the creatures of Hezbullah + Hamas + Iraqi resistances, do you really wanna give those mofos more power ? to an unstable country that will soon be thrown by its own people ?
Do the Western nations and Senor Grossi show any concern about Israel's nuclear programme? or is it only Iran that they want to investigate for developing nuclear weapons?
'what was there? where is it now?' ...that line got me
Why shouldn't Iran have nuclear weapons?
It was the U.S. a democratic country that built the first atomic bomb and used it and not a regime. when you talk, you make me throw up.
You talk about monitoring Iran's nuclear program. I like to ask you, who monitors the nuclear programs of the superpowers to prevent them from building Nuclear bombs?
As long as Israel remains a threat to Iran, Iran would be irrational to make any agreement with the US. Libya is testimony.
I don't know why Iran is even working with the Western country's on this....
Iraq had no nuclear weapon that's why usa and nato attacked iraq
But iran ha nuclear weapons thats why they are not attacking iran
You should tell what you are telling Iran to the superpowers, but it is always the same story that the rest of the nations can't build nuclear bombs only the superpowers can do nuclear bombs and can have them.
Israel has threatened to drop nuclear weapons so maybe we should be talking about that.
This dude was being kind of absurdly diplomatic. The Iranian stance that it's a peaceful nuclear program falls flat on its face from even casual observation.
Iran do not have any obligation whatsoever to maintain that stance , do you realize it ?
Shame on IAEA
As with any diplomat's statement, it can be interpreted.
"We have no intention to build nuclear weapons" is the face-value statement and may, or may not, be true.
However, if one were to have a stockpile of nuclear weapons components, one might easily assemble the weapons in a hurry.
Every nation that has innovative weapons systems has fibbed a bit.
why IRAN cannot have a Nuclear weapon??? It is its choice and is a sovereign country ..
I hope you will go and visit Israel's nuclear site as well to see and tell us their nuclear statues otherwise you are just pulling Iran down for nothing
was done some 50-60 years ago
Inspected by the same racist colonials who created them lol
Iraq cooperated and was destroyed
good point!
At this point it seems to me that both Iran and Israel are some seriously bad countries, however only one is seen as such by the Western media. It's easy to be deluded into thinking that one people are inferior and need to be taken out. Look at Germany in the 30s and then at us + Israel nowadays. Meanwhile, Iran's fundamentalism is also contemptable.
Thank you for this interesting interview.
I thought Trump was the one that pulled out from the nuclear treaty with Iran 😂😂😂
The guy is corrupt
Why western countries have a nuclear but Iran 🇮🇷 isn't allowed
What has the IAEA said about Israeli nuclear program?
The Persians have the duty to develop it if they want to extend the existence of what's left of that civilisation
Why shouldn't Iran have a nuclear weapon? They would be naive not to.
They better not be ever let them get close.
Iran have the right to have nuclear weapons too
You should be grateful that Iran is still signitory to the NPT. When will you start inspecton Dimona and Israels nuclear weapons? Double standards as usual!
You can not change the way dictators want things to be done unless there's a forceful means that overwhelms them to helplessness. Museveni in Uganda also has been developing nuclear weapons secretly with NK
Why do several countries have to get nuclear weapons? Is there any reasonable logic to this? Any countries have the right to have nuclear weapons for their defense.
As long as some countries have their weapons, Every other country has the right to make its weapons
but this guy seamed more nutral. nice to see someone like him in Global West.
Iran is peace country...
We can have but you cant? Why US/Israel do not accept nuclear weapon free middle East? "Israel asserts that states in the Middle East must establish peaceful relations before negotiations on a Middle East Nuclear Weapons Free Zone can begin"
Iran is developing Nuclear weapons, why play the game of "Maybe"
Why doesn't everyone cooperate
Iran has the right to create nukes for self-defense.
Grossi has investigated Israel nuclear sites & has confirmed that nuclear proliferation has not taken place in Middle East region via Israel. He has attested that Israel has not developed a bomb. So it is important that Iran too should stay within non proliferation treaty and should not be developing a bomb.. out of fear from an Israeli bomb.
Israel didn't strike nothing stop lying 😂😂😂
If i remember the former Iranian foreign ministry's interview on cnn when a deal happened, he meant to the journalist that moment, like you can verify our nuclear program as many times as you like and we will cooperate 100 percent every time, we have nothing to hide, and we want to be transparent. Yet Trump cancelled the deal to come to this present situation. Once Russia wanted to join NATO, the us said, no,we would like you to be a villain. The cold war ideology is a great threat for climate change you know, but us will never understand. Their autocratic structure won't understand. Military budget receiver won't be able to go to Hawaii if they do so.🤔
Nice dissinformation
@@antlerman7644 ask cnn for the clip, btw, i watched it live.
@@antlerman7644go read about iran deal. They poured concrete in their nuclear sites. Yet US broke the deal over nothing and sanctioned iran worst than any country in the world.
Russia only wanted to join NATO for the same reason as they are on the UN security council. To undermine its operation. Nice troll attempt.
Why is everyone in the comments unconcerned about the obvious issue of Iran having a nuclear weapon and is interested in Israel having one?
Quit playing dumb, the west has reveled not to trust them or the security council, Israel has reveled that might is right, all the countries in the world should get nuclear weapons, because either we all get to be independent states free from super powers interventions and bullying or none of us are, and stop acting as if only Iran has extremists, Israel's government is filled with them.
double standard
Israel already has nuclear weapons? Isreal is not part of the non-proliferation treaty and was able to obtain it with the help of France in the 1960s.
And what's up with the earthquakes inside of Iran can't all be natural occurrences?
Can you people talk about Israelis nuclear weapons programs.
They kept speaking English like this when North Korea got the bad bomb....
I think it’s the IAEA that should be more clear because Iran held up its part of the bargain and the USEA with the USA broke the deal
Why UN, not inspected Israel Nuclear site ? Iran have the rights to build Nuclear Weapons and no need permission from anyone. The West worried about Iran Nuclear program, but not about Israel which is very dangerous Regime. God Bless Iran Forever 🇮🇷 Love to Iranians from Senegal 🇸🇳❤ 🌍🙏
So long as Israel has nuclear weapons, other countries in the region see that as a threat; It gives Israel “carte blanche” to pursue aggressive posturing in the region without the threat of any serious retaliation. It’s no wonder other regional players aspire to acquire nuclear weapons!
8:35-8:45 did he said drop nuclear as in Gaza at the start of the conflict?
Hypocrisy, you forgot to mention existing Israelis' ATOMIC BOMBS.
In other words he's saying "chill it fellas" 😂
If Iran had deterrence there would be peace in the Middle East. But most do not understand.
Why should we trust Rupert Murdoch media?
Shame on this organisation
Why should one corporate with the enemies
Iran has right to. develop nuclear weapons as US , UK , France , Germany & Israel have nuclear wepons # 🇵🇰
Why would Iran care about others when its neighbour threatens it?
Nobody is the boss here, and everyone should mind their own.
West vs. East ladies and gentlemen.
Well,Iran doesnt need its own nuclear weapons. The Russians and the Chinese got that covered.
Why worried of iran nuke when so many country have it
Why just Iran? China, all counties specifically China and Russia should cooperate more
Saying something without knowing is mining less
area51 also produces nuclear weapons and who is solving this?
yes, they should send us money too
Israel can certainly be more cooperative about its actual existing nuclear program that it's repeatedly threatened to put into practical use at Gaza and virtually with its neighbors.
@7:55 we hope they dont attack, yet we still supply weapons
You need access to the Iranian nuclear program, but you can't ensure that Iran will get sanction-free. 2015 nuclear deal ensured that Iran would cooperate and WEST would not impose sanctions on Iran, but the US, due to the Israeli lobby, got out of the deal. Why does Iran cooperate?
If Israel can, why not Iran?
They have a right to self defense
No, Because with that argument? all Nations could/would have nuclear Weapons. That would greatly increase the chance/risk for a Nuclear War. That very easy could have dire consequence for all People on Earth (if we dont get WW3 and all would die). So there is a very Good reason to limit the Number of Nuclear Stats to as Few as Possible. Thats why USA has agreeded to Protect countrys like Nato,Japan,Australia,Taiwan,S Korea,Philippines and others with Nuclear Weapons if necessary, So They dont have to develup thire Own Nuclear Weapons.
WMD axis of evil.... Sound like its time to buy military contractor stocks
Well this time it’s actually the truth. 👳🏽♂️👳🏽♂️👳🏽♂️👳🏽🐪🐪💥💥💥💥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥☠️🪦
Then just why Israel has nuclear weapons? They even threatened to use them against none-nuclear & civilians people in Gaza!!!
Do you guys have balls to ask the same question with ISRAELIS?
Grossi and his IAEA are hardly neutral when it comes to Iran.
Why USA has lots of Nuclear, israel and UK etc? Why dont u put sanction on israeli nuclear facilities?
Or whatever wester do is right but if same thing copied by asian, then why its a big problem for u?
Dw talking about Iran nuclear weapons, talk about the genocide in Gaza
Both Israel and Iran have the right to possess nuclear weapons to maintain a balance
No, Because with that argument? all Nations could/would have nuclear Weapons. That would greatly increase the chance/risk for a Nuclear War. That very easy could have dire consequence for all People on Earth (if we dont get WW3 and all would die). So there is a very Good reason to limit the Number of Nuclear Stats to as Few as Possible. Thats why USA has agreeded to Protect countrys like Nato,Japan,Australia,Taiwan,S Korea,Philippines and others with Nuclear Weapons if necessary, So They dont have to develup thire Own Nuclear Weapons.
Now have the same claims and actions against Isreal, who in fact has illegal nuclear weapons.