I would love to see like 500k Spartans protecting the one true lord and savior battle duck from 500k mid-evil knights, 500k Persians, and 500k Roman’s. If you think the Spartans won’t stand a chance maybe add like 100k reinforcing troops come running from behind the enemy lines or something.
Its unfair to have shermans when the red coats dont have cannons. Does the game not have cannons for the red coats? If so that would be cool to watch, maybe scale the battles down to more practical numbers and better battle formations with flanks protection, and why not have both sides on attack mode
Sadly there are no red coats, however bullets do a lot of damage to the tanks :) You actually don't see dead tanks since when they die they actually just disappear
You'd have to give them at the very least WW1 era artillery for it to have any hope of denting a Sherman, and even then, only the heavy guns would be doing that. Artillery era appropriate to redcoats is about as effective against WW2 era tanks as the muskets. This fight is inherently unbalanced. Really the US army should stay out of musket range and mow them down with their own artillery since the M2A1 outranges musketmen by about 7 miles.
@@Paul-bs5wl well considering the red coats use muskets it was unfair from the start anywayz yeah, i didnt mean adding cannons would actually balance the probability of red coats winning, i just ment if it has everything of ww2 era then it should have everything of the other era aswell including their cannons
The early part of that battle shows how effective volley fire could be. however the Americans effectively had very mobile artillery cause the Sherman's main gun is easily equal if not superior to 18th century artillery. It would be interesting to see if you give the redcoats the same number of cannons as there were Shermans.
The game mechanics are borked. At least during the initial stages of battle, when the brits fired volleys, several shooters would aim at the same opponent. And only the front row of soldiers would fire. Then they'd go down on one knee and start reloading while the second row moved up to fire their volley. This 'simulator' have the brits firing individually, and soldiers further back is also firing. In short, the first volley should NOT have taken out as many US Army troops as it did, and before the second volley, a lot of the troops would have dropped to the ground and taken up firing positions.
Would it be though? WW2 rifles beat muskets in everything. There is no reason to go up that close if you can just sit further out and pick the enemy off because they should have far greater range and accuracy.
I know that this is a game and balance is needed for it to work, but there is no way that muskets would have better range than shotguns. And they are nowhere near as accurate either.
Great fight but would like to see a “part 2” of this with the shotgunners starting behind the sub machine gunners, I get the initial idea to put them in front cause they’re close range but tactically they’d go behind them so the sub machine gunners and Sherman’s could lay down fire to open up for the shotgunners to move in without as many casualties Edit: and possibly half of the Sherman’s to make it a closer fight
Given that armies before the Napoleonic Wars weren’t that large and the US Army in ww2 was one of the largest factions along with the Soviets, if these two armies met each other on the field in real life, they’d probably be equal in size! Except, the British force would cover an entire theatre of war while the American force would be a small task force sent to capture a bridge or an important town!
i think it was a bit unfair for the red coats since they didnt have any artillery to keep the tanks at bay. Next time add some artillery for the red coats to make the battle more interesting!
Given that armies before the Napoleonic Wars weren’t that large and the US Army in ww2 was one of the largest factions along with the Soviets, if these two armies met each other on the field in real life, they’d probably be equal in size! Except, the British force would cover an entire theatre of war while the American force would be a small task force sent to capture a bridge or an important town!
The shotguns with slugs (A023) would have been on par with the range of the British smooth bore muskets. Also the British would have a reduced rate of fire.
@@perkaare7454 During the reign of the highly inaccurate Brown Bess, the average British soldier was expected to fire three rounds a minute. Highly trained and experienced soldiers could fire up to 4 rounds per minute.
*How Americans see how the Revolutionary war went* - What really happened - More Americans dying to disease & starvation than in battle and the British just got bored and left to send their prisoners to a different place (australia)
@@Jshh7s "full force" is so funny lmao. France sent huge support to the Americans, and Britain had a large amount of troops defend Britain and were at war with France during the revolutionary war. As well Spain gave large bits of territory to America in support, and large parts of America was owned by France previously before being sold.
I lvoe this stuff lol, u should do a separate content where u use different skirmishes in history with the same terrain and etc. I think ppl would love it :)
Sherman tanks don't bleed, they're just bloodstained. In this game, there's blood when they're hit, which I think you're in for the realism of the game. But I think it's really weird.
South Africa had a number of epic battles. Blood river with the Voortrekker Boers against Dingane's Zulu army, Vegkop with the boers against Mzilikaze's army, Isandlwana and Rorkes Drift with the Redcoatss against the Zulu armies, Spioenkop and Magersfontein with the British against the Boer armies. Even a historical recreation would be interesting or a simulation of a million Zulu warriors against the redcoats at Isandlwana. There are masses of historical data available online on any of the above battles.
More than ridiculously-sized armies, I'd like to see more mixed forces. Foot soldiers protecting mobile ranged units supported by artillery, etc. You kinda have that here with the Americans, keep going with it.
Hey Daley, I am just wondering if you thought about this. Is Obi wan really the master of the HighGround because he had the low ground fighting Maul and when he fought Anakin he technically had the low ground because Anakin jumped above him.
Watching the red coats get tossed into the stratosphere by Sherman fire is arguably one of the funnier aspects of this fight. Omg I had a good laugh from that! 🤣
With the people dying, it's because while rare there is friendly fire. I noticed that in the zombie battle where redcoats were dying before the zombies were close to them.
You are for some reason I don't understand adding shotgun soldiers to this army . Very few soldiers carry a shotgun during combat except special units . They typically carry the M1 Garrand rifle which has a far faster firing rate and range.
I've got it: 10,000 night club bouncers vs 1,000,000 slightly drunk girls in miniskirts and heels trying to get in the club. The bouncers are arned with tasers, the girls have purses.
People talking about giving the Redcoats canons lol. Give the ww2 soldiers their artillery, mortars and most decisive of all machine guns or even a gatling gun.
Ummm as I was saying when it comes to melee units... try putting 2 different melee teams on top of each other or place them on top of each other so that all of them will fight, instead of them waiting at the back for their turn... and give the different teams some reinforcements so they will have a second round of clash
This should be a walkover by the WW2 Army! A British soldier could maybe fire 3 rounds a minute. A WW2 Soldier with a Tommy Gun could fire between 100 - 300 rounds a minute! Should be an easy battle!
I would love to see like 500k Spartans protecting the one true lord and savior battle duck from 500k mid-evil knights, 500k Persians, and 500k Roman’s. If you think the Spartans won’t stand a chance maybe add like 100k reinforcing troops come running from behind the enemy lines or something.
That rules great idea
Great idea dude!
Sounds amazing
Great idea
Mid-evil
Its unfair to have shermans when the red coats dont have cannons. Does the game not have cannons for the red coats? If so that would be cool to watch, maybe scale the battles down to more practical numbers and better battle formations with flanks protection, and why not have both sides on attack mode
yeah the wacky ones r cool but this game is kinda just that it doesnt have enough realism to recreate crazy battles like that yet but im not sure
As the Shermans didn't die you could have had 1 Sherman vs 1M red coats and the tank wins.
Sadly there are no red coats, however bullets do a lot of damage to the tanks :) You actually don't see dead tanks since when they die they actually just disappear
You'd have to give them at the very least WW1 era artillery for it to have any hope of denting a Sherman, and even then, only the heavy guns would be doing that. Artillery era appropriate to redcoats is about as effective against WW2 era tanks as the muskets. This fight is inherently unbalanced. Really the US army should stay out of musket range and mow them down with their own artillery since the M2A1 outranges musketmen by about 7 miles.
@@Paul-bs5wl well considering the red coats use muskets it was unfair from the start anywayz yeah, i didnt mean adding cannons would actually balance the probability of red coats winning, i just ment if it has everything of ww2 era then it should have everything of the other era aswell including their cannons
The early part of that battle shows how effective volley fire could be. however the Americans effectively had very mobile artillery cause the Sherman's main gun is easily equal if not superior to 18th century artillery. It would be interesting to see if you give the redcoats the same number of cannons as there were Shermans.
The game mechanics are borked. At least during the initial stages of battle, when the brits fired volleys, several shooters would aim at the same opponent. And only the front row of soldiers would fire. Then they'd go down on one knee and start reloading while the second row moved up to fire their volley. This 'simulator' have the brits firing individually, and soldiers further back is also firing. In short, the first volley should NOT have taken out as many US Army troops as it did, and before the second volley, a lot of the troops would have dropped to the ground and taken up firing positions.
Would it be though? WW2 rifles beat muskets in everything. There is no reason to go up that close if you can just sit further out and pick the enemy off because they should have far greater range and accuracy.
I know that this is a game and balance is needed for it to work, but there is no way that muskets would have better range than shotguns. And they are nowhere near as accurate either.
@@shadow_ax you're actually missing that it's not a game, it's a toy, realism is completely irrelevant to UEBS
Yeah no. Volley Fire isn’t very effective
Great fight but would like to see a “part 2” of this with the shotgunners starting behind the sub machine gunners, I get the initial idea to put them in front cause they’re close range but tactically they’d go behind them so the sub machine gunners and Sherman’s could lay down fire to open up for the shotgunners to move in without as many casualties
Edit: and possibly half of the Sherman’s to make it a closer fight
More than that I’d say use a quarter of what he used, then Sherman’s are bullet sponges
Given that armies before the Napoleonic Wars weren’t that large and the US Army in ww2 was one of the largest factions along with the Soviets, if these two armies met each other on the field in real life, they’d probably be equal in size! Except, the British force would cover an entire theatre of war while the American force would be a small task force sent to capture a bridge or an important town!
Yes what he said… or even it up by adding cannons to the red coats army
To be fair you sent half of the American army to their deaths, so more Americans definitely would have survived had they been using Thompsons
i think it was a bit unfair for the red coats since they didnt have any artillery to keep the tanks at bay. Next time add some artillery for the red coats to make the battle more interesting!
Given that armies before the Napoleonic Wars weren’t that large and the US Army in ww2 was one of the largest factions along with the Soviets, if these two armies met each other on the field in real life, they’d probably be equal in size! Except, the British force would cover an entire theatre of war while the American force would be a small task force sent to capture a bridge or an important town!
The range on muskets wasn't very far and their rate of fire was waaaaayyyyy too quick.
Not a single Sherman died. They may take damage but that's no good if they don't cease working or blow up.
As if 18C muzzleloading cannons are going to do anything against a TANK.
I'd love to but sadly it doesn't exist in the game :/ maybe one day!
Instead of shotguns, give them Garands. The 30-06 would be far, far more effective than the scatter guns.
And the M1 was also the normal and most widely used firearm by the Americans in WW2
The shotguns with slugs (A023) would have been on par with the range of the British smooth bore muskets. Also the British would have a reduced rate of fire.
the British. were able to fire 5-7 Shots a minute with the Muskets.
@@perkaare7454 During the reign of the highly inaccurate Brown Bess, the average British soldier was expected to fire three rounds a minute. Highly trained and experienced soldiers could fire up to 4 rounds per minute.
Yea, these muskets are freaking overpowered. Thompson's seemed underpowered as well.
shotguns in ww2 not allowed WTF
@@tucanman9775 The Marines used shotguns in the Pacific. The Model 37 was probably the most common. Not a major contributor, but used nevertheless.
How about the red coats vs WWII riflemen, carrying Springfield and Garand rifles?
Can you do Redcoats and knights vs Persians and World War 2 Soldiers? A nice mix of melee and range
Yes
I love a good commentary and a good large scale battle and you supply that and MORE thank you so much
Ok that’s a lot of red coats
Well, you gotta coverup blood stains somehow.
(Also red dye was just the easiest and cheapest to use).
Your vids have made this game a must-have for me if I ever got a PC and now that I am soon I cannot wait to play this game! 🤙
300000 shotgunners vs300000 Vs 2000 Sherman's
100,000 Sherman tanks vs 3 million zombies
*How Americans see how the Revolutionary war went*
- What really happened -
More Americans dying to disease & starvation than in battle and the British just got bored and left to send their prisoners to a different place (australia)
Me as French : Hold my baguette
Americans get taught that they took on the full force of the British empire and won
@@Jshh7s "full force" is so funny lmao. France sent huge support to the Americans, and Britain had a large amount of troops defend Britain and were at war with France during the revolutionary war. As well Spain gave large bits of territory to America in support, and large parts of America was owned by France previously before being sold.
@@christophermichaelclarence6003 I offer my condolences
Not how that happened lmao
How are you playing this game? It was just released as Early Access on Steam.
Is there another way to play?
Haven't checked all of your videos yet. Will we see the British Empire vs. the Galactic Empire?
Might be one of my favorite battles here
I lvoe this stuff lol, u should do a separate content where u use different skirmishes in history with the same terrain and etc. I think ppl would love it :)
Sherman tanks don't bleed, they're just bloodstained. In this game, there's blood when they're hit, which I think you're in for the realism of the game. But I think it's really weird.
"it's like artillerys hittin em"
Yeah, funny that...
South Africa had a number of epic battles. Blood river with the Voortrekker Boers against Dingane's Zulu army, Vegkop with the boers against Mzilikaze's army, Isandlwana and Rorkes Drift with the Redcoatss against the Zulu armies, Spioenkop and Magersfontein with the British against the Boer armies. Even a historical recreation would be interesting or a simulation of a million Zulu warriors against the redcoats at Isandlwana.
There are masses of historical data available online on any of the above battles.
Love your videos and I watch them everyday. Which means I've watched pretty much every video you've made. Love you (No homo).
It is so fun and Relaxing to watch at the same time Nice work love it
Lets see the Warhammer 40,000 universe such as Chaos Marines, Tyranids, Orcs, Titans, Necrons ect.
GPU: sips coffee...
My brain: ...your gonna have seizure very soon. o_o
Those Brit’s are wayyyyy too accurate
Once the game fully releases and mods are made hopefully it will be easy to port them over it will be real fun
"Millions of Musketeers running and screaming wild"
USA show up on England for preparing for D-Day... "It's a trap!"
Can you do like 10 different Roman testudos of 200000 holding against 3-4 million medieval knights surrounding them
More than ridiculously-sized armies, I'd like to see more mixed forces. Foot soldiers protecting mobile ranged units supported by artillery, etc. You kinda have that here with the Americans, keep going with it.
I Like this vid i want more! :D
The video is best with the volume turned all the way down :)
Hey Daley, I am just wondering if you thought about this. Is Obi wan really the master of the HighGround because he had the low ground fighting Maul and when he fought Anakin he technically had the low ground because Anakin jumped above him.
yes that is awesome
Soldier on soldier and this may have been closer. But add the tanks, no contests.
4:05 the artillery IS hitting them
PLEASE MORE REDCOATS
What about us 🇫🇷 ?
If a single red coat survived he will have PTSD
This looks awesome
Watching the red coats get tossed into the stratosphere by Sherman fire is arguably one of the funnier aspects of this fight. Omg I had a good laugh from that! 🤣
love the videos keep up the good and cool video
With the people dying, it's because while rare there is friendly fire. I noticed that in the zombie battle where redcoats were dying before the zombies were close to them.
US 🇺🇸 vs UK 🇬🇧
As French 🇫🇷 which side I should join ?
Can you make a Napoleonic War video. Please please
Plenty of blood to satisfy Khorne. Blood for the Blood God!
I'd love some renaissance cannons in the game.
As well as some ancient archers and ballista.
What program are you using?
You are for some reason I don't understand adding shotgun soldiers to this army . Very few soldiers carry a shotgun during combat except special units . They typically carry the M1 Garrand rifle which has a far faster firing rate and range.
I've got it: 10,000 night club bouncers vs 1,000,000 slightly drunk girls in miniskirts and heels trying to get in the club. The bouncers are arned with tasers, the girls have purses.
Why do the red coats not have canons this would be more accurate
Where did you find this footage of the American revolution?
I would have liked to see this with the Redcoats having thier artillery. They had howitzers too you know.
1M redcoats vs US WW2 army
US WW2 army: *laughs in nuke*
It would be interesting to do 1000 WWII Americans vs 10,000,000 Romans.
Daley I think it would be cool if you did 1,000 Sherman’s on defense vs 100,000 trolls
Cool it with the tanks, dude.
I don't remember learning about this part of the American Revolution.
People talking about giving the Redcoats canons lol. Give the ww2 soldiers their artillery, mortars and most decisive of all machine guns or even a gatling gun.
You should do Shermans vs Ogres. That would be a fun one
You should do a proper long bowman with the high range
5000 Archers,2,500 Shotgunners, and 1000 machinegunners in a Rabun Gap scenario against a They are Billions Zombie horde.(2 Million+)
okay, now do 3 Sherman tanks vs The Entire US Army
Wow!
Your majesty!! General Washington has managed to create huge metal machines of death!! Britain is doomed!!😮🤣👍💯
And here I was hoping for some 18th century artillery. :)
OMG I FINALLY FOUND YOUR CHANNEL AGAIN YES!!!!!!!!!!! FINALY!
Me ''Hear that?'' Them ''Umm yeah, it sounds like genocide!'' Me ''Naw that's just FREEDOM in progress!''
This would be more fun if you employed some simple battle formations
I would wonder if you could give the brit's some cannons?
Give the RedCoat Canons with Grape shots, manhand rockets
Those muskets are firing as fast as a bolt action rifle.
try a battle with an infantry line infront of ranged. like red coats with a line of romans infront defending against Spartans
If they have cannons in the game, do this again with cannons on the british side!!
Do you think you could do more new maps instead of staying with the same maps
the firefly version of the sherman. it had a more powerful cannon than the standard sherman as it was high velocity.
Thats not a Firefly tho. Its a normal Sherman with 76mm Cannon
That's funny that the Sherman's take musket damage and bleed love watching these videos on my wife's Tablet
Yay
Wait, am I seeing things or is the blood actually flowing on the ground?
Amazing video
Idea: 1 mil ducks vs 150k spartans
Ummm as I was saying when it comes to melee units... try putting 2 different melee teams on top of each other or place them on top of each other so that all of them will fight, instead of them waiting at the back for their turn... and give the different teams some reinforcements so they will have a second round of clash
Replace the shotguns with the M1 and 1903 and see how much faster it goes
I enjoy your scenarios. You should consider doing a simulation on the battle of armegedon -
Genius strategy by the red coats... They made the American's coats red and made them red coats
Hey Daley. Couldn’t sleep all night and it’s 5am. Thanks for keeping my company overnight.
The Valley could’ve wait until they are clustered together for more kills
900k medieval knights vs 1,000 US World War II soldiers
Ok, we'll give you that one, but we'll be back! 😈🇬🇧
British need a cannon to face off the Sherman
Yeah
This should be a walkover by the WW2 Army! A British soldier could maybe fire 3 rounds a minute. A WW2 Soldier with a Tommy Gun could fire between 100 - 300 rounds a minute! Should be an easy battle!
Hey Daley really liked the video, could you do 10000 god mode spartans vs 1million american rifle man?
Now try doing this in man of war assault squad 2 with American World War II soldiers and American soldiers from Vietnam
Family Friendly Content with a Pinch of Massacre
How do you arrange your armies so well? I have a hard time getting them spread right and then getting them places accurately.
You lost me at "...Shermans can die to musket fire..."
The red coats had a head start and also had a number and position advantage but the Americans prevailed
is it possible to place the Eldar in there already