Charles Brehm - Witness to the assassination of President John F. Kennedy
Вставка
- Опубліковано 11 жов 2023
- Charles F. Brehm and his 5-year-old son, Joe, were standing in the Dealey Plaza north infield grass, a few feet south of the south curb of Elm Street, across the street from Abraham Zapruder and the Dealey Plaza grassy knoll. They can both be clearly seen in the Zapruder film.
Brehm said President Kennedy was approaching him and only 30' away when his son then started to wave to President Kennedy, and the President started to wave back, then Brehm heard the first shot he remembered hearing.
When the President was 15' to 25' away, and had just passed, Brehm remembered hearing a second shot that struck President Kennedy in the head. Brehm watched the President's "hair fly up," "ripple," and "bits of brain and bone went flying" and "then roll over to his side" then President Kennedy "slumped all the way down."
Brehm stated he distinctly remembered hearing another separate shot after the President's head had already exploded that missed hitting anyone, and that was the specific reason that Brehm immediately dragged his young son to the ground and covered him protectively.
Charles Brehm was not called to testify publicly in front of the Warren Commission, but he did supply a deposition.
… “No, I was not called by The Warren Omission to testify.”
Omissions. Like that. I'll call it that too now..if ok. It's the truth!!
"We found no credible evidence of a second shooter." - Warren Commission
"Scientific acoustical evidence establishes a high probability that at least two gunmen fired at the President. Other scientific evidence does not preclude the possibility of two gunmen firing at the President." - US House of Representatives, HSCA Report, published in 1979
What if the Texas Rangers had investigated this after 1968. Do you think that it would have been disclosed what really happened or why, or were Texas Rangers the perpetrators used by GHW Bush?
@@arcanondrum6543 , Has been debunked.
Who in the heck did the Warren Commission actually talk with to gather information? It seems that all the witnesses in close were ignored.
The only "credible evidence" considered by the Warren Commission was the evidence that Lee Harvey Oswald was a lone nut. All other evidence was disappeared or deemed to be "not credible".
All the witnesses for the most part, who saw and heard shots coming from the front, were not called to testify. They needed an overwhelming number of people to lie as to the source of the shots, to help railroad LHO.
@@rickemmons7300 , There were 552 witnesses interviewed by the Warren Commission.
The Dallas police made the initial investigation.
People saw & heard the gunman shooting from the 6th floor of the building.
People on the 5th floor heard the bullet shells hit on the 6th floor.
LHO's rifle with his fingerprints were all over the rifle found on the 6th floor.
His fingerprints were all over the boxes.
He was the only employee not accounted for in a head count of the employees.
Eyewitnesses saw LHO shoot Officer Tippit. His gun was used in killing Tippit.
Eyewitnesses saw him acting suspicious and saw him go into the movie theater.
Dallas police were called and found him in the theater where he was confronted and arrested.
The gun used in Tippit's murder was on Oswald.
The Dallas police linked the bullet found months earlier to an assassination attempt of General Walker to Oswald's rifle.
How was LHO not the shooter of both JFK and Tippit?
Why should the Warren Commission conclude any differently or ignore than the Dallas police investigation?
WC interviewed hundreds of people. Brehm later described his interviewer Mark Lane as "a despicable liar."
@@rickemmons7300 a) Your "railroaded" Oswald owned and smuggled the rifle, lied to police about his whereabouts, left his latent print on the gun, immediately fled the crime scene, shot a cop, was caught trying to shoot a second cop, observed, "Well, they say it only takes a minute to die" after asking about the penalty for cop-killing, refused to cooperate, refused help from the President of the Dallas Bar Association, acted so smug he even convinced his own brother he was guilty, never attempted to blow any conspiracy to anybody, and just shrugged a hollow, rambling reply when asked on live TV, "Did you shoot the President?"
b) All credible medical, forensic, film, ballistic and eyewitness evidence demonstrate the shots came from the sixth floor window, and from Oswald's rifle.
c) The idea anybody would ever assume they would frame this on a lone shooter while firing from multiple directions with different guns is obviously laughable.
Another eye witness very close - 15ft to 20ft away, he's a US Army Ranger - truthing and the Warren Commission didn't have him speak.
He made a statement at the Dallas PD dept and was there for four hours being questioned.
Getting interviewed on tv saved/protected his testimony from grooming it before publication?
Seems he started hedging statements like President Ford when he said, "Whatever it was", but a hard Ranger to break?
He heard the whizzing of bullets in air flying close by?
How far can whizzing of bullets be heard?
The “whistle” or “buzz” may be the product of vortex shredding from the projectile. If the frequency of the shedding is within the human audio spectrum, you may hear it. The volume of air affected by a bullet is very small. Hence, you will hear it only if it is close by.
Bullets from real guns only 'zing' if they ricochet off something hard at a fairly shallow angle. This causes them to tumble very rapidly and the turbulence of this motion as they fly off, sounds like a high-pitched whine that fades into the distance.Dec 18, 2022
Bullet could make 2 different sounds, one if it hits certain frequency when flying and another bouncing off target at shallow angle causing bullet to tumble and change sound?
Someone shot twice would remember the same exact sounds?
Same weapons even?
The "whizzing bullets" can be heard at the distance this man said, and it was also recorded. Everyone says they heard 3 shots. I heard a recording of 3 shots with the "whizzing sound" that the TV crews recorded, like the ppl screaming too. But I've also heard shots, specially cleared of background noise, absolutely unaltered of 5 shots. 3 and 4 very close succession. But the 1st was the throat, and the 5th was the head shot. Silencers were used by some to trick the ppl. But the First and fifth were in absolute time to the millisecond of the target. I can only promise that the two shots in close succession, the 3rd and 4th, were not one. Yes, they were absolutely in close succession and to the untrained or ppl not aware of these sounds, they could get it mixed up..and think they heard only 3..especially if far away. No way were any shots similar to "firecrackers" as some suggested. Though that "whizzing" could be mistaken for a firework...from a good 50 ft away.
@@bookofrevelation4924 Yep. Thank goodness for that.
Thank you Mr Brehm .Truth be told
Haha You realize who he’s talking to right? You might wanna find some unbiased points of view, this isnt just an interviewer seeking the truth, but someone willing to distort facts to support his book sales. But here’s the same guy years later talking about how he doesn’t like manipulative conspiracy writers like lane, and how he believes the Warren commission got it right and the shots came from behind the motorcade, not the grassy knoll. And that’s 60 years in a nutshell, why so many people believe in conspiracy. Mark lane and his distorted facts, outright lies, half truths, and manipulation. Here’s behm ua-cam.com/video/lu9jKPGf2K8/v-deo.html
This interview casts doubt on the credibility of the Warren Commission.
lots of stuff does, the biggest thing being the fact that allen dulles was appointed to it, complete joke!
Charles Brehm later described his interviewer Mark Lane as "a despicable liar."
This interview casts doubt? Ya think?
I'm not an expert but I've had some experiences in life that I believe make me qualified to comment on the throat wound. I've never seen anyone who's been shot in the 'front' reach around and check the bullet exit wound. They seem to always put their hands up to the entrance wound.
One shot in the back lungs levil ,another one in the the mutch higher throath ,does not matter front or rear,could never been the same bullet because of downward trajectory in case of shot from the rear. confirmed by half parkland, throat was clearly entrance wound during arrival at parkland
I think everyone realizes that the neckshot was an entry wound. The idea that a bullet on a 17-degree downward angle could hit JFK in the back to the left of his shoulder blade and travel upward to exit his neck is patently absurd. Only the Apologists who believe in the single shooter nonsense of the Warren Report cling to that. JFK would have to be levitating above the Limo outstretched for that to be true.
You're right. I think it is obvious, but never heard it stated before. If true there should be no doubt where the shot came from.
And the head shot? Which direction did the round came from? 🤔
@@charlese1293 Clearly from the front based on the reaction of JFK's head jerking back violently to the left, with brains, blood, and bone matter spraying everyone and everything directly behind him.
I wish I could go back to 1963, Nov. 22 , 12.30 at Dealey Plaza and take a look to the grassy knoll behind the wooden fence…
You get shot for looking
You would find nothing
Someone tried and was told they could get shot and killed if they tried to come any closer.
Went ashore at Omaha Beach where the worst of the Dday fighting occurred, he also served in the Korean War, later agreed with the Warren findings but also stated unequivocally that there was another shot after the head shot and the car had started accelerating which whilst not hitting anything nearby was so close it scared him the most.
Another shot after the head shot leads to the conclusion that LHO did not act alone, hence, he could not truly agree with the Warren findings.
@@Chris.Brisson How many shells were found in the book depository by the window?
@@anonymouspubliccitizen5000 three shells were found on the sixth floor of the TSBD, though one theory (to explain why a number of witnesses in the Plaza perceived only two gunshots) was that one shell may have remained in the chamber from the previous shooting of the rifle and was ejected prior to the shooting that day.
Thanks very much for posting this clip and please post more. I remember Charles from The Killing of Kennedy documentary. I am President Kennedy's reincarnation and President Lincoln's reincarnation.
Brehm recalled the event well and told the truth. He got harassed after and was angry with Mark Lane because his comment about the piece of brain or skull that flew backward and to the left was another piece of inconvenient evidence for the WR Apologists. He regretted saying what he had witnessed because it conflicted with the WR and anyone or anything that conflicted with the WR was considered either a lie or an unreliable witness.
"When the 2nd bullet hit" "I saw a piece of the skull fly over in the area of the curb. Left and back." Yet Brehm was never called by the Warren Commission. But then they never even called Jack Ruby to testify.
I guess in all the chaos, Mr. Brehm didn't hear the third shot. But seeing how the second and third were virtually on top of each other, and from the area he was at where echoing would've likely been the loudest, he may have not been able to discern a third shot.
This poor man has had a lot of mental issues. He’s an emotional wreck. I feel bad for him.
Military coup d' tat - all bases covered
If the El would commit this act on a sitting president what value can one place on their lives and our future at this time? Food for thought, GOD ALONE has the power to undo man's insatiable insanity...Pray America...don't sit and think, kneel and PRAY!!!
Delusional thinking is the problem, not the solution.
Whaaahahahaha!
Umbrella man was a signal person. After the shooting both men sat there stoicly while half the crowd ran towards the fence area. One had an old military style walkie talkie in his back pocket.
Arthur and Joe?
@@jeffeverett274 B.S.
It’s funny how mark lane always try to spin these witnesses. When they said something totally different to the fbi years prior, just after the incident. Behm himself believes the shots came from behind the motorcade but you wouldn’t know that with lane manipulating things. Just like Helen Markham Tippit witness, saying the shooter was chubby, yep that theory was also started by lane with markham saying she he kept prodding her to say that, and had no doubt it was actually Oswald. No wonder brehm holds contempt for conspiracy writers ua-cam.com/video/lu9jKPGf2K8/v-deo.html
More BS.
but the magic bullet was real🤣
@@seanwhitehouse2274 "Magic" bullet makes perfect sense and is backed up by hard evidence.
@@aaronz7056 Describe "hard evidence." While you're at it, please explain how one bullet remains intact and the other from the same gun fragments while passing through the same object.
@@zyrrhos Okay.
a) Victims' reactions in Zapruder's film clearly demonstrate they are hit by the same bullet, and ergo, from behind.
b) Within 1-2 frames of Kennedy being hit, Connally's lapel pops out, his shoulder is driven down, his hat flips up, and his expression violently contorts between frames from the blow. One bullet, and ergo, from behind.
c) Connally was demonstrably seated lower, inboard, and turned sharply to the right.
d) Victims' wounds line up on a demonstrable trajectory and track straight back to the window.
e) View of the entry wound on Connally's back would demonstrably have been blocked by Kennedy's body, meaning the same bullet has to have gone through both of them.
f) If you could have been bothered to actually examine the recovered bullet before lecturing me it's "intact," you would have seen it is in fact badly crushed at the nose and flattened down one side.
g) That condition is consistent with going through Kennedy without hitting bone, slowing and tumbling on leaving him, as it would have done, then broadsiding its way through Connally's ribs, as medical and forensic evidence clearly demonstrate.
h) That bullet was matched to Oswald's rifle.
i) In fact, all bullets and fragments ever found were matched to Oswald's rifle.
j) The later bullet, on the other hand, smashed directly into Kennedy's skull and exploded, causing a massive exit wound at the temple, again consistent with a shot from behind.
k) Witnesses directly under the sixth floor window firmly said the shots all came from directly from over their heads ("boom, click, click, boom, click, click, boom...").
l) Nobody planting a bogus bullet at the hospital within one hour of the shooting could possibly have known a bullet needed planting at all or that he wasn't simply planting one bullet too many into evidence and blowing the whole plot.
Brehm, of course, later firmly described his interviewer Mark Lane as "a despicable liar." Correctly.
feel free to believe every word of the warren report
@@AMC2283 Let me guess, Brehm was part of the conspiracy, right? LOL
@@AMC2283 He also took the vaccîne for a donut.
@@zyrrhos You care to actually address what I said or are you just here to make meaningless attempts at abusive and childish insults?
@@aaronz7056 Hardly meaningless, more like implication. I addressed some of your points on another video. You are ubiquitous in these JFK comment sections, so I'm sure you'll find it.