I own a number of TI84PCE Hardware Rev. "N", which is faster than the pre Rev. "M" models, I also own an fx-CG50 both are fantastic calcs I wish the Casio calcs had a larger following in the US, as good documentation is more difficult to come by.
Try ‘The calculator guide” or “Casio edu” both are good UA-cam channels that will tell you how to use the tool. If you want something specific and can’t find it for the CG-50 type it into the search bar and if other models show up like fx-9750 of 9760 you can watch pretty much every Casio graphing calculator functions the same way.
By the way, is it (on the fx-CG50) possible the use of units in the "equation solver" app like on the HP 48G series calculator from Hewlett Packard? On the HP 48G series, when using the "equation solver" you can use units even in different system and get the solution of the variable you want. For example: Volume of cylinder (I work with diameters rather than radius): π × (d/2)^2 × h = V d = 6_in h = 1500_m V = (solve)_bbl With the HP 48G series, you can add units (even in different system) to each parameter. For instance you enter 6 inches (6_in) for the diameter, 1500 meters (1500_m) for the height and you want to get the volume in barrels, so you write whatever value in barrels (1_bbl). Then you press "SOLVE" on the volume and the calculator gives you the volume of the cylinder in barrels. Should you want for instance the diameter in meters instead of inches, then you write it in meters (6_m), or the volume in cubic meters or cubic feet then write the unit accordingly (1_m3 or 1_ft3). And so on. You can use any type of unit. Is it possible the use of units on the Casio fx-CG50 in the "equation solver" like you can do on the HP 48G series?
you probably don't need this answer but what you described, I am fairly certain is literally what CAS does. So no, it doesn't have CAS and is therefore accepted to be used in PSATS, ACTs, CATs, etc.
@@syfico I did finally purchase the Casio and no, it hasn't that ability like HP calculators do. Anyways and even thinking the HPs are better machines, I do still like the CG50.
@@hamishmcpenguin603 It means it can run Python, a programming language, natively. You can even make Python programs directly from your calculator (though I don't advise it)!
@@Zrun5 interesting, that newer ti-84 probably has it better integrated? with color syntax etc? I am not user of it, only observing this all; but its killed by touch flat ad machines...
Being Spanish together with English the two most important languages in the world, I wonder why the rear side of the package of this calculator (Casio fx-CG50) is written in several languages except in Spanish.
Well this isn't much of a surprise. The fx-CG50 has a *much* better processor than the CE! And clocked at a much higher speed. Did you have Detect Asymptotes on with the CE? That would definitely have slowed it down a lot. I would like to see you try out speed tests other than just graphing. Try some ASM program speed testing or some summation math or other tests. As you should know, mathematics isn't all about graphs, there's much more to it than that. ;)
This one was mostly meant to be seen in the context of my review on my website of the fx-CG50, where it is embedded in the "Graphing" section on the review. But thank you very much for the suggestions I may make an updated video. To answer your question, yes I did have detect asymptotes on on the CE, mainly because this is it's default setting so that is the way that most users will experience the calculator.
Limitation of hardware. The ti-84+CE is clocked at the same speed as the CG-50 but the ti-84+CE has an 8-bit CPU while the CG50 has a 32-bit CPU so higher precision math requires optimized routines on the ti-84+CE while its just one instruction on the CG50.
This is why I'm glad I was born in the UK. I don't think I've ever seen a TI calculator over here. They're all Casio.
Hp prime is way better than all those non cas ones used by kids.Morever Hp 50g is best.
I guess that the TI-84 came out earlier than the Casio
@@claudeshannan4000facts
The King is dead. Long live the King.
Damn I made the wrong choice, i should have looked farther before i bought my ti84. I'm in love with Casio calculators.
Jæk I hope you still have the receipt
@@princeplotena nope, had it for over a year
Jæk oh well, at least the ti isn't too bad
@@princeplotena yeah, and texas instruments input is used in most textbooks
@@jaek_898huh, I guess I am the only kid here that likes graphing calculators.
I was torn btwn those two but I already had the Casio fx-991ex and the cg50 was a good $70 cheaper too. Glad I made the right choice!
Muy buen video, felicidades. Esto es lo que a veces ando buscando de comparación entre unas calculadoras y otras, sencillo y practico
Yes I chose the right one!
thank you for existing I'm buying a casio
always love casio !!!!!
Ok
I own a number of TI84PCE Hardware Rev. "N", which is faster than the pre Rev. "M" models, I also own an fx-CG50 both are fantastic calcs I wish the Casio calcs had a larger following in the US, as good documentation is more difficult to come by.
Try ‘The calculator guide” or “Casio edu” both are good UA-cam channels that will tell you how to use the tool. If you want something specific and can’t find it for the CG-50 type it into the search bar and if other models show up like fx-9750 of 9760 you can watch pretty much every Casio graphing calculator functions the same way.
Kids-Ti 84 plus ce
Men-Hp 50g
Legemds-Hp Prime
@@claudeshannan4000 Gods - photomath
I finally gave up on my HP50G and its complexity, even though I miss the RPN aspect. This Casio is great, I got mine on ebay for a great price.
By the way, is it (on the fx-CG50) possible the use of units in the "equation solver" app like on the HP 48G series calculator from Hewlett Packard?
On the HP 48G series, when using the "equation solver" you can use units even in different system and get the solution of the variable you want. For example:
Volume of cylinder (I work with diameters rather than radius):
π × (d/2)^2 × h = V
d = 6_in
h = 1500_m
V = (solve)_bbl
With the HP 48G series, you can add units (even in different system) to each parameter. For instance you enter 6 inches (6_in) for the diameter, 1500 meters (1500_m) for the height and you want to get the volume in barrels, so you write whatever value in barrels (1_bbl). Then you press "SOLVE" on the volume and the calculator gives you the volume of the cylinder in barrels. Should you want for instance the diameter in meters instead of inches, then you write it in meters (6_m), or the volume in cubic meters or cubic feet then write the unit accordingly (1_m3 or 1_ft3). And so on. You can use any type of unit.
Is it possible the use of units on the Casio fx-CG50 in the "equation solver" like you can do on the HP 48G series?
you probably don't need this answer but what you described, I am fairly certain is literally what CAS does. So no, it doesn't have CAS and is therefore accepted to be used in PSATS, ACTs, CATs, etc.
@@syfico
I did finally purchase the Casio and no, it hasn't that ability like HP calculators do.
Anyways and even thinking the HPs are better machines, I do still like the CG50.
... and now it has MicroPython 1.9.4 in new FW 3.20 ;-)
What does this mean?
@@hamishmcpenguin603 It means it can run Python, a programming language, natively. You can even make Python programs directly from your calculator (though I don't advise it)!
@@GRBtutorials I've done it. It sucked
It still uses micropython 1.9.4 on ver. 3.80.202
@@Zrun5 interesting, that newer ti-84 probably has it better integrated? with color syntax etc? I am not user of it, only observing this all; but its killed by touch flat ad machines...
Definitivamente me compro la CASIO.
L'ho comprata anche io. Una bomba
I feel like I've been scammed 😭
thx for the test but any maths examples illustration and applied for??
Hey, is it just me or am I the only kid here that likes graphing calculators?
Nice video, thanks. I guess TI needs to renew its flagship! Just waiting for the announced Python release in the Casio.
Being Spanish together with English the two most important languages in the world, I wonder why the rear side of the package of this calculator (Casio fx-CG50) is written in several languages except in Spanish.
Well this isn't much of a surprise. The fx-CG50 has a *much* better processor than the CE! And clocked at a much higher speed. Did you have Detect Asymptotes on with the CE? That would definitely have slowed it down a lot. I would like to see you try out speed tests other than just graphing. Try some ASM program speed testing or some summation math or other tests. As you should know, mathematics isn't all about graphs, there's much more to it than that. ;)
This one was mostly meant to be seen in the context of my review on my website of the fx-CG50, where it is embedded in the "Graphing" section on the review. But thank you very much for the suggestions I may make an updated video. To answer your question, yes I did have detect asymptotes on on the CE, mainly because this is it's default setting so that is the way that most users will experience the calculator.
Prime cas beats wolfram
Can you do a comparison between the CG50 and 9750 gii?
Is this slow graphing a feature or a just a limitation of the HW?
Limitation of hardware. The ti-84+CE is clocked at the same speed as the CG-50 but the ti-84+CE has an 8-bit CPU while the CG50 has a 32-bit CPU so higher precision math requires optimized routines on the ti-84+CE while its just one instruction on the CG50.
Casio doesn't plot the y=0.5tan(x) correctly.
Casio is known for their processing
The CG50 and Ti84 Plus CE T are not even in the same league. The proper competitor is the TI N Spire CAX 2
They're both way too slow for what they cost.
Viktor Rucký the Casio fx cg50 is (and has been for a minute now) currently $59 on amazon
I have the FX cg50 and it Is never slow even when you graph multiple functions. I never thouhgt to need more speed
k.o. casio says：i can beat ten！zaza
My country banned the import of these two 🥲