Luke clearly states that Jesus and not Simon was crucified. Irenaeus states that Basilides believed that simon was crucified and that this is a herresy. Basilides was a gnostic who beleived that God was a Father and Jesus was a manifestation of god as the nous. That is also a herresy to muslims. There is no early churchfather or heretic which comes even close to being a muslim.
That's like saying many early Muslims thought Muhammad was a false prophet.
which they actually did! LOL infact there were wars to convert people back to Islam!
It's not
Luke 23:26 backs up the early Christians narrative, the Quran doesn't back up your non-existing narrative😉
You need to watch AP and David wood. Might learn!
A narative FULL of LIES!
Luke clearly states that Jesus and not Simon was crucified. Irenaeus states that Basilides believed that simon was crucified and that this is a herresy. Basilides was a gnostic who beleived that God was a Father and Jesus was a manifestation of god as the nous. That is also a herresy to muslims. There is no early churchfather or heretic which comes even close to being a muslim.
dont you know the prophecy from OT that jesus shall not be killed , and He will be saved? so how can he be then crucified?
@@skakvac reference?
@@skakvacisaiah 53, several psalms….. etc
You are sleepy..
what the fk? The crucifixion of Jesus is the core of Christianity from the start after Jesus died