If you wish to support my work and help me continue to tell it how it is, please consider supporting my work on Patreon www.patreon.com/themetatron Join this channel to get access to more old school Metatron videos the algorithm wouldn't prioritize! Support freedom and get your prefered content!: ua-cam.com/channels/IjGKyrdT4Gja0VLO40RlOw.htmljoin
Conspiracy theories........ Once Flat Earth was normal and globe was a conspiracy theory. Dinosaur fossils were conspiracy theory. Government and companies spying through ur devices were a conspiracy theory. Now UFO is transitioning from conspiracy theory to mainstream. Don't let ur dogma prevent u from expanding ur mind.
Now I get why Howard was replaced by Don Cheadle in the MCU. He constantly complained about Tony's armor not being scientifically accurate according to his irrefutable research 😂😂😂
@@koja69 if what you mean by "high all the time"? Is that he so lacked sufficient oxigen at birth that it so effected his effective IQ that he now has the aproxamit brain power of an ameba?... then... okay
That was my thought exactly! I bet he'd sing a whole new tune about "0" if he did a movie and when it was time to get paid they wrote him a check for "$0.00"! Or if they filled out with the words "All the money in the universe is IN the universe so we all have all of it"
Turns out a ton of "cuz the government" stuff turned out to be true in the last 10 years. Maybe amend your comment to the more accurate "there's an additional two BECAUSE THE WHITE MAN...." Way more contemporary.
"In May 2024, Howard was a guest at The Joe Rogan Experience, where he attempted to debunk the Pythagorean theorem, claimed he can kill gravity, said he does not believe in the number zero, and claimed he remembers the events of the day he was born" may be the funniest sentence on all of Wikipedia
Doesn't believe in zero?? FFS that's pre medieval thinking 😅 I will not make a comment about stereotypes, I will not make a comment about stereotypes 😅
Is water wet? It *makes* things wet, but is it, itself, capable of making its own entity wet? "Wet" is the state of being covered/soaked in a liquid, but water isn't covering or soaking anything, it simply is.
He does have some math knowledge. He was using some popular high school equations to pretend like he was impressive to the mathematically average Joe Rogan team. Like how he memorized some of the numbers he gave at the end. But ultimately he's a fool and if he spoke to anyone with the talent stack for math, philosophy, and language. . .or simply someone with a strong grasp of language and debate (with a slight dabble in to philosophy), he would get destroyed very quickly, like how Metatron ripped him apart here. I noticed his language problem immediately. His whole conspiracy theory is based on a false premise. If he's serious about it, it's sad he's gone down such a rabbit hole in his own mind and wasted so much time over nothing.
@@Trapster99 They are known for conspiracy theories, though usually isn't about other types of people that are unlike him, rather than numbers, if you get my meaning.
@@snakeplissken7671I don't think Howard uttered a single correct, coherent sentence but it's not like I hung on every second of the interview. I do hope if there's one interview that ruins Jo Rogan this should be it. I actually started as a fan of Rogan back in the day. Solely because he was a sober, rational voice of reason. (I know it's really hard to believe now) Before dangerous misinformation became a legit, respected political stance.
The narcissistic personality disorder might just be a comorbidity of his delusional disorder. He is pretty much a textbook megalomaniac, but he has persecutory delusions as well. You are right, though. There is no point arguing with someone like him. He's mentally incapable of admitting he's wrong. It's like arguing with a Flat Earther. The blend of condescension and ignorance is unbreakable.
There’s other diagnoses in psychology than NPD. This is much closer to schizotypal personality disorder, an entirely different cluster. He isn’t stupid. He expresses himself well, is curious, reads. But he is capable of making and accepting associations that the average person would exclude. Much like the schizophrenic, he sees conspiracies. He has a genuine good faith conviction in a complex system of thoughts which has no grounding in reality. Imagine if you had the power to complete a jigsaw puzzle by effortlessly pushing incompatible puzzle pieces together.
@@Roke1222 I have experienced a type of madness like this after getting a Rx for weed. And it was a little more intense than just being paranoid. It was like reorganizing reality. I'm not sure how much of it was psychedelic but all I can say is the only thing that helped me was asking help from God. So I get it that a lot of people dont believe in an unseen world because they have not had any experience which justify that idea.. I have. So when I see people like T. Howard.. I remember my demons. How I felt intoxicated, it was confusing but it satisfied my desire to be plugged into something interesting. Idk that me saying this will mean anything to anyone unless they experienced something very similar where the creepy stuff wasn't just on the inside (inner voice) but also the outside, other people behaving oddly.
I was hoping that at the end of the calculator segment, he told everyone, "Now, hit Enter. Hold it upside down. What do you see? It spells 'Boobs'. Thank you, I'll be here all week."
I remember in primary school, I was taught that multiplication using terms like groups. You have 2 groups of 2 apples. How many apples do you have in total? Awnser 4 apples. Now, if I were to write this sentence as 1*1, it would be: you have one group of one apple. How many apples do you have? That guy just proved why those long wordy questions in math are actually important.
@_simplyjake_ I thought that was obvious as well. A group of 0 is 0. Although, technically, 0 is not a group given the meaning of the word, but in this context, I think it works.
@@lenahandsen6836 replace the word group with the word bucket, you can have a bucket with two apples in it, a bucket with one apple, and a bucket with no apples in it. How do you like them apples.
I was taught multiplication is multiples. 1 multiple is just 1.1 in multiples of 2. 1 in multiples of 3. Or 1×1, 1x2, and 1x3. A multiple of zero then would be zero with the idiot above trying to do some stupid gotcha.
Well, a significant number of them are high school dropouts. So combine that with a very inflated sense of self-worth due to the nature of their job and you're bound to get a lot of wackos.
I Think people love to witness situations like this because deep down, they want to feel ‘empowered.’ They perceive the ‘academic’ as being wrong, while the person who doesn’t conform to rules or follow conventional paths is seen as smarter, even a ‘genius.’ It’s reminiscent of 80s movies where an ordinary individual triumphs over Olympic champions and achieves the seemingly impossible. There’s a sense that perhaps, even without formal study, training, or effort, they too can succeed.
It is exactly this. Especially because the world is really great at financially rewarding horrible behaviors and personalities, meanwhile 'smart' people are chained to a desk for their whole life to make like triple minimum wage. ... We create a lot of rules, rule breakers tend to be the most successful because they dont settle for scraps like the rest of us.
@@Ma_nerd I was actually talking about this "genre" of movies, like: Red Dawn - A bunch of American teenagers fights against a Soviet invasion in their hometown, Karate Kid - an ordinary teenager, learns a few tricks from Mr. Miyagi and defeats the much better trained Johnny Lawrence. Rocky series - Rocky Balboa faces and defeats much stronger and more aggressive opponents.
@@RodrigoCorreia2099 I mean, in fairness, an ordinary bunch of Afghan goat herders beat the most technologically advanced military the world has ever seen. And, just a few decades after they beat the Soviets, to boot.
@@J5L5M6but they didbt tho. We were only there to get the oil , and the heroin control shit enough to do that and put in a regime to gaurd and run the poppy fields for us. Missuin accomplished.
It really surprises me how people believe in apparently complex scientifical "theories" made up by people whose job is to pretend to be someone else in front of a camera that have no formal education in math or science. Actors are overrated
Your comment made me think of Ricky Gervais when he hosted the Golden Globes and used some of that to tear actors apart for thinking they're as important as doctors and engineers 😂
It's a problem that is getting worse and worse thanks to influencers and their... influence on the younger generation. Terrance is barely on the top of the iceberg when it comes to insane things these people are trying to push on the young. Tiktok and media platforms like it has to be age restricted and our school system needs to be brought back in line, don't let the inmates run the asylum.
He did the math and thought his salary should add up to equal to or greater than Robert Downey Jr. since he was the one that really made the first Iron Man movie work. At least his math and logic skills remain consistent . . .
Right, 'cause don cheadle isn't a twat. I don't know, what the reason was but you don't get kicked out of hollywood because you're insane. You get hired because of it.
@@unitron2005 Being easy enough to work with or having massive star-power are literally the only 2 things Hollywood cares about. Howard has none of those. You're right that being nice means little to nothing when massive divas like Bale or Norton get pretty good work consistently.
I kinda wondered how this guy managed to get fired from an otherwise unfireable job as one of the Avengers. Now i realize that "contract dispute" was code for "this guy is nuts and makes us uncomfortable."
How did you come to the conclusion that he had a job or that his job as an actor in a movie made him immune to termination or being fired? Even with a contract, there are clauses that would allow a studio or employer to terminate an actor for violation of said clauses. If he displayed THEN the absolute lunacy that he’s displaying NOW, I’m sure that even if he hadn’t violated any part of his contract, they’d rather just pay him to go away verses dealing with his clear mental health issues.
@@mjallen1308 bro.. he spoke in a slight hyperbole regarding the fact that obviously marvel studio would much prefer to continue with the same actors as they make their movies. It takes quite a bit for them to part ways with an actor, and its not unreasonable to be surprised even terrance managed to cross whatever line they have. Don't be a youtube comment literalist printing out paragraphs just for the sake of an argument..
When I was a kid, we learned that the multiplication symbol could be replaced with the word “of”. Therefore, 1x1 can be explained as 1 of 1. 1x2 can be explained as 1 of 2, etc, etc…… it’s elementary.
In theory, we could redefine multiplication as something else in another mathematical system, but we generally use the system we're using now because it's the most useful one.
So then what would be the answer of two of two because if one of then two of two would be two , where am I wrong... Because. 2 of is still speaking in a singular term about the double identification.The number two that's the double identification... It's 2 things being represented by one word a double identification. So if you have two of two you still just have two... So under the Current multiplication theone of 12 of 23 of three would all equal the number they started with 12 and three...
@@Bryanth-996 Well, if you do math with, I dunno, little cards with numbers written on them, 2 of cards with the number 2 will make two cards. But this kind of "multiplication" would deal with entities of different order: one 2 would be a quantity, the other 2 would be a thing. Proper math deals with entities of the same order: both 2s must refer to quantity. So 2*2 would mean 2 of groups containing 2 cards. Common language, of course, has other ways to put things, and that's why math uses the very strict and defined language of math, and what we get, especially as beginners, are translations. Translations are never perfect.
Ok, so let me get this straight - if I take money from Terry's bank account and use it to buy a car, I haven't stolen the money, because the car is still his because it is in the same universe, so it is ok for me to drive it whenever I want. Hey, everyone! Drinks are on Terry!
Fun (false) fact: historians agree that the conflict between Athens and Sparta spurred from a conflict of theology. However what was less known is that Athenians purposefully used Terryology to aggrivate the Spartans so that they could claim that their rivals were "meat headed jocks"
I still can't help but hope this Terrence guy is legitimate troll. Like in "Pinky & The Brain" show, where in one episode Brain explains his whole plan to recover the world, which includes "brainish" as global language.
@@utrock5067 oh, he'd become my favorite person on earth! But unfortunately I think he's as serious as a heart attack. Plus anyone who's ruined their reputation this bad would have came out by now. Mark my words: in a year he'll be in a Steven Seagal movie😂
My math teacher explained multiplication this way: the first number is how many items are in each group, the second number is how many groups are present, the last number or answer is how many items are present. This made things so easy to visualize and understand. 😊❤
Bro doesn't understand math grammar. 1x1 is equivalent to saying "1 of 1". I have one set of 1, therefore I have 1. 5x10 is saying "5 of 10" and so having five 10's is lo-and-behold, 50. 🤯
Also you can multiply a number by .5 or something and it will always be less. How is it "multiplying" if it becomes less? Lol. I wondering if I his mind 10×0.5 is actually division in some weird way.
What almost everybody gets wrong, though, is claiming that three times *more than* 10 is 30, when that is linguistically illogical, and the correct way would be to say three times *as much as* 10. "Three times less" is even more cringy and should be "a third as much".
Every child is taught multiplication with groups of small items like M&Ms or something like that to make it understandable and completely unambiguous to even a child. Its sad and pathetic that this guy has failed so hard at something children can understand.
When I was very young we learned that "1 x 1" means "Take 1, one time," which is inescapably 1. In all honesty? He sounds like he's on the spectrum. And, yeah, very possibly narcissistic.
His argument reminds me of when I was in first grade and got a problem wrong because of the term "borrow". I reasoned that when you borrow something you give it back, so I added more than I should. I'm on the spectrum, so I can see where a language issue can cause problems like that. However, that was back when I was in first grade, and I didn't conclude I was being lied to when I was told that was the wrong way to do it.
@@Cerebrum123 There are many, many people on the spectrum and that's how we make new inventions, or ideas/ways for others to follow. Some are called geniuses, some brilliant, etc., but just spectrum is not enough to make an error - there must be the lack of self-monitoring and abudance of a narcissist trait to it giving the outcome of a prototypical Dannig-Kruger effect. In short - a nut case.
Not exactly. Hubbard was a psychopath who studied black magic, Alistair Crowley, mental subjugation and also kidnapped, raped and abused several people.
i haven't looked at any formal definition of 'multiplication', but i've always saw it as a mathematical operation, specifically a shorthand for addition. the multiplicate is the instruction tells us how many times the original number has to be added to itself. and using the multiplication method results in the same outcome as adding method is the proof for my statement that multiplication is simply an addition instruction. eg. 1+1+1+1 = 4, while 1*4 = 4. i called it a shorthand because when you dealing with extremely large numbers, multiplication is significantly faster than adding them. easy to follow with whole numbers but multiplying by fractions... that's an additive instruction to add portions of the whole (fractions) to itself, which is a mind bender.
@@ThomasBrenton-pk8gg I'm sure many people have but in response he accused them of being a part of the grand conspiracy to silence him and his ideas. Hell he did it in the joe rogan episode when talking about neil degrasse tyson
@@alvarogoenaga3965 I can explain this to Howard and he would understand me. 0.5 X 0.5 increases in a different Universe. That 5 after the 0 lives separately from us. In that infinity 5 multiplies to 25, but for us it diminishes because it brings it further away from our reality. We live above 1, there is no zero in our reality, when you talk 0 to 1 that's a whole different infinite, similar to the quantum realm for us. So the more you dive into that infinity the further you get from our reality.
@@seanrookeeI mean we all learned and understood how multiplication works as children. Terrance clearly doesn't understand how basic mathematics works.
I saw a comment saying " isn't Terrance Howard a dumb actor? There must have been a dimension shift because he is now a genius" Not thinking maybe he was smart all along or something but rather there was a Mandela shift in the universe and now the new Terry is a science genius.
13:40 That was not philosophy, that was sophistry. He argued about ownership; his entire metaphysical babble was to create a magical gotcha that doesn't make any sense. For if everything's connected (in his meaning) then there is no giving or taking apples in the first place, yet he claims the other did not receive anything and he still has all the apples, which hints that is a solipsist (he believes, thinks, that only he exists and nobody else).
@@BloodSweatandFears I actually like the man's acting. But yeah, he definitely went off the deep end with this crap. And it probably either had something to do with psychedelics or he just has a mental disorder. It's actually hard to tell which it is, but if he was acting that way on film sets I can see why his career took a dump... No one wants to hear all that nonsense when they're trying to get a job done.
No, it's more than attention seeking. He believes this stuff, listen to him. IT'S A CONSPIRACY, THEY AREN'T WRONG THEY'RE INTENTIONALLY LYING. He's schizophrenic and needs anti-psychotic medication.
No. 🤑💰💸💰🤑💸💸💸🤑🤑🤑🤑🤑💰 They idea is to sell a book. He gets 10-15% of the sales. If he manages to sell millions of books he will make millions of $. He has to pay taxes on that too.
One quirk of language that is fun is the word "or". Compare what "or" means in day-to-day language to what it means in formal logic: "or" is typically used as the formal "exclusive or" (XOR function in programming). Say you want to go to dinner, and you are given the option of pizza or tacos. You're not having both, and both you and the one giving you the choice know that. This is why jury instruction have to use "and/or" when applicable, and it annoys be when people act like "or" alone acts the same. Common language doesn't use words the same as formal logic.
Actually you made the same use of the common "or". "Am I a recovering alcoholic or afraid of ghosts?" You aren't expecting "yes" as an answer, though in either case you are avoiding a house because it's filled with spirits.
There is one reasons why you would want to do that. Imagine you want silence, so you use NC headphones but you still hear faint white noise and and there is a pressure on your head. If you put fabric between the headphones and your ear that goes away.
It doesn't surprise me to see Terrence Howard saying this sh*t. Considering how he treated his first wife and that time he attacked a flight attendant just because she asked him not to get up when the seatbelt sign was on, it's clear that he's not the brightest lightbulb in the asylum. 😅
I read an article about his second or third wife-his most recent one-said their relationship lacked romance. They never went out to dinner or had romantic evenings because she was constantly helping him cut out plastics for his models. He was obsessed with his theories and ideas, and his narcissistic behavior meant they never went anywhere. She spent so much time indoors helping him that she now believes she has agoraphobia. Their house was filled with plastics, and her life revolved around cutting out shapes for his models. After their divorce, which was finalized three to five years ago, she is now supposedly engaged *to him* again. It’s an unbelievable story!
@@Ameenah69 It's not just believable, that sort of nonsense the norm in Hollyweird. Quite frankly I'd rather have Hollywood actors invent goofy bullshit math theories than do unspeakable things to children.
I've watched many different reaction videos regarding this fellow. You're break down is so well put together so well articulated and so well presented. It is head and shoulders above the rest. Please consider doing more breakdowns like this. It is very captivating and stimulating to watch.
This is exactly the same argument I use against people using conspiracy theories to "debunk science." Without science, we wouldn't have got out of the stone age.
@@prophecygg5826Howard reminds me of those people that claim that math racist what shows they don't understand math and they don't understand the history of it and the thing is he and those people can prove to themselves that they're wrong simply by grabbing objects and utilizing reasoning if you have one set of one then you have one if two sets of two then you have four if you add two sets of two together you have four and so on and so forth it's easily proven that's why math is the truth in a commonality in every language in every culture
Terrence Howard having any impact on the future of space travel will be about the equivalent of Eric Cartman walking into NASA, and going up to a scientist working on a massive shuttle component, and just saying ‘Why don’t you move this… m’yaaaa, and then move this just a little - bit - over - m’yaaaaa, okay shit if I know what I did but if it works you’re f*ckin welcome, peace nerds!!’
My favorite quote which I admittedly stole from another "Terrence is crazy" video is something like, "If you made one Iron Man movie and you were paid 1 million dollars for said Iron Man movie (i.e. 1x1), then you would have one..., er, uh, two million dollars, right Terrence? Better call the IRS!"
Something I've noticed is that certain people of, shall we say, lower than average intelligence seem to be unable to delineate between the thing that a given word describes, and the word itself. It seems to be an issue with abstraction. In cases where the word is inadequate to describe the concept, their inability to understand concept and word as separate entities leads them to see the linguistic issues with the thing's descriptor as issues with the thing itself. This would seem to flow from that source.
In this regard , there are some words in forgein languages that do not translate well into English.My dad was German.Sometimes he might come out with some saying, and I would ask what it meant.He would explain it, but depending on what the phrase was and words used , he would have to explain the meaning behind certain ones as they didn't really translate so he would try to give some examples.that would make sense to me a non speaker.
It’s like saying 1 + -5 = 6 because + means addition and “to make more of”. Multiply is usually making more of something but not in absolutely every case. Times-ing or X is not necessarily “multiplying” or “making more of”, it’s “if you were to have that number by another number that many _times_ what would it be?” So if you have 1 only once, you still have 1.
I use, one of the digits represents how many boxes, the other is how many objects are in each box, you can switch them either way and it always works. 1x1=1 every time.
Brilliant breakdown! I've watched a lot of the "Terryology" debunking videos and they all were around the math's. This breakdown gives a lot of nuance to the linguistic portion of how Terrance Howard speaks and I think a lot of "Terryology converts" don't really understand language as well as they think. Great job!
This is the kind of crap I used to come up with on mushrooms when I was a teenager and then wonder why it didn't seem as insightful the following morning. Its appears Mr Howard hasn't come down just yet.
Over 10 years ago, when Terrence Howard was replaced in the Iron Man franchise, he was already insane and Terryology was already born. The man's original "theory" started because he couldn't conceive how 1+1=2 but 1x1 didn't equal 2. The man doesn't understand the simple difference between addition and multiplication. He's a certified lunatic who lost a lucrative position in the Iron Man franchise by apparently demanding he get paid basically the same as the actor for Iron Man himself and wanting to spread the word of Terryology on set. Also, why he didn't call it Terrencology instead, I will never understand.
Wait. Dude who has serious problem with maths can tell if someone is getting paid more or less? How is that even possible? But aside of that, it farther explains, why leftist kids are so dumb.
Terrance was offered for Iron man 2 a fraction of what he was offered for Iron man. Your stories about what was going on on set might have something to do with it. Also Don Cheadle was a batter actor and asked for less than half of what Howard for on Iron man 1.
I doubt they planned to pay him less for iron man 2 without any reason. Probably he would have had a lot less screen time in the sequel or other things were at play. He was probably insufferable and the production didn't consider his presence as important. Iron man was a giant hit, I don't buy the narrative in which the production played dirty. Imagine paying for having this clown around.
"if you had one healing potion in a game and use it, how many potions do youhave left?" would've been better than the apple thingy, but Terry would've said some shit like "because I drank it it's in my body and therefore I still have one" like an actual raving lunatic.
The apple was a perfectly fine analogy. Howard is an idiot. His implication is in fact that you have all apples at all times, which is asinine. It's one of those things idiots say to appear deep and in tune, when in fact it's all just dumb.
An argument that would go on and on. If I rebutted that with: "Yes, you drank the potion and it's in you, but technically it is no longer the potion due to the chemical changes going through the digestive system. So no---you don't have the 'potion' as it were, because NOTHING remains as it was once digested." Then he would say: "But technically the potion is part of the chemicals in your digestive system, so it's still a potion..." This is called "circular reasoning fallacy". And the foundation of "Terryology" is that. As long as the potion exists in ANY form, it's still a potion.
I was gonna make the same joke but you beat me to it. It still works with an apple if you say that you ate it. Though I wonder...if I went and stole his car and sold it, could I still claim to him that he didn't really lose it as it's still there in spirit? What's frightening is that he might actually go for it.
Your presentation was brilliant and concise, made more over impressive in that you employ a completely different science to debunk this theory. I am furthermore impressed that by the sound of your accent, I would guess that english isn't even your 1st language, yet your use of it was masterful. Hat's off to you Sir.
One off-topic story. Terrence Howard acted in The Hunting Party with Richard Gere in Bosnia. A friend of mine was the assistant for him and Mr Gere. One day she called me to send her the contacts of music stores in my area, which would have some saxophones in store. I was a bit confused, I asked her if she was transfered into props department. She said no, but it was a long story. She said she bought all the saxophones in Bosnia and Croatia and she needed to find some more, quickly. Terrence Howard needed them, he gave a saxophone to every woman he f...ed. If your wife or girlfriend has a saxophone, I would ask some questions....
all of them in croatia and bosnia? so potentially hundreds and hundreds? possibly nearly a thousand? bs, terrence howard having time to meet, bring, have sex, finish up with a saxophone session and a place to fucking hold them all. was she asking for music stores to buy a saxaphone for a girl terrence had sex with? yeah sure, but embellishing it into an economic boon for the saxophone industry in eastern europe is dumb
...Why is Metatron covering this? I'll take it. EDIT: Ah, so that's why. Linguistics, jumping into conspiracies lmao. Great vid. 13:53 Yeah, maybe if the professor had instead asked him how many Avengers movies he'd starred in he could have gotten through.
Why question why? Watch. Gain knowledge. If you're unreasonably questioning "why is so and so talking about this" you prime your mind to learn nothing. If you aren't interested, don't watch.
@@ne0nmancer Let me try to respond how Terrence Howard would. "What do you mean product? Do you see a barcode on my forehead? Do you see a discount tag on my caller? I am not a product because I am not for sale by retailer."
Multiplication IS addition . Multiplication is an operation that represents the basic idea of repeated addition of the same number . like 1 x1 is 1 adding 1 times = 1 , 1x2 is 1 adding 2 times = 1+1 = 2
When Metatron read a part of Terrence's book, my eyes felt like they popped out of my head and switched places. That is how crossed-eyed and baffled I was when I was listening.
"In the end the Party would announce that two and two made five, and you would have to believe it. It was inevitable that they should make that claim sooner or later: the logic of their position demanded it." -George Orwell, Nineteen Eighty-Four
Which is why I believe (attn conspiracy theory!) that ppl like Howard are used to identify people willing to believe literally anything. Because those are the cornerstone of every violent revolt.
They were pretty much interchangeable terms when I was in school, we called it multiplication but we would say 9 times 9 when pronouncing the equation.
When Terrence says there is no such thing as ZERO, he means there's no such thing as "Nothing" with a big "N." He says that because "Nothing," as the opposite of "Something," doesn't really exist. Here's how set theory helps explain it: - Imagine "Something" as a set that includes everything that exists, called S{all existence in here}. - Imagine "Nothing" as a set that includes the absence of everything, called N{nothing in here}. In set theory, even sets are things. So, set S{} is a thing, and set N{} is also a thing. This means that set N{} (Nothing) is actually part of set S{} (Something) because it's a thing. Now, according to set theory, an opposite set can't be part of the set it's opposing. But since N{} is part of S{}, it can't really be the opposite of S{}. This means that "Nothing" is actually a part of "Something" and not its complete opposite. So, when Terrence says ZERO doesn't exist, he truly is wrong/misunderstanding his own reasoning because ZERO is actually a part of Something. Since ZERO is defined as set N{} belonging to set S{}, ZERO does exist because it is a thing. In short, "Nothing" with a big "N" can't oppose "Something," so "Something" exists by default, and "Nothing" doesn't.
I’m wondering if he thinks 1x2=3, 1x3=4 and so on? I don’t think he understands that multiplication is shorthand for addition. A way of counting multiples.
The moment mr. Terriologius started asking his interviewers to define ''multiply'' you can already tell that this is all over him just misunderstanding an english word. Oh, and Ugandan drone money.
The second term can be considered as simply the number of times you have the first term. 1 x 1 is a single time the first term. If you have one apple 1 time, you have 1 apple, not two. The worse thing is that this is so obvious but nobody points to him in those interviews.
So there's your ex calling you a narcissist, and then there's proper narcissism that's a real mental disorder. I think that because that word gets thrown around a lot people don't realise how serious it is and to just agree with everything Terrance is saying shows that no one close to him cares enough to get him the help he needs and that's really sad.
Who knew that the solution to cold fusion, faster than light travel, self-replicating nanites, male pattern balding and erectile dysfunction could all be solved by simply just agreeing that 1* 1 is equal to two
As an Asian, this insults me. 😂 Also, in a computer science way, math IS repeated addition as multiply is a recursive functiin. You add the sum of the expression you get when you take the first number and it is added the number of times (also another way to say multiply) represented by the second number . So 2 × 3 means 2 + 2 + 2 as two would appear 3 times. In the case of 2 x 1 ( x1 is the identity function) because it would be just the number itself 2. Multiplication is commutative so it will work the other way too... so 2 x 3 can also be 3 + 3 (3 appewring twice). This is the result of DEI and common core math.
I do agree, and I'll also say this is the result of being famous/wealthy, never being truly challenged in one's delusions. Or maybe people are so baffled by the nonsense he's spewing, they have no idea how to respond so they just grin and nod out of second hand embarrassment.
no need to push a message that clearly doesn't apply here due to Terrence Howard was long out of school when DEI is common place. neither is your later accusation grounded, since common core math seeks to impart mostly fragmentation method into arithmetic while (to some people) needlessly overcomplicating the process. yet it is not a fallacious approach. it differs from traditional method merely in its 'complex' approach. it still determines 17 x 6 to be 102. the difference is: it reaches the conclusion by fragmenting 17 x 6 into (10x6)+(7x6). the fact that it reaches the same arithmetic answer as traditional method proves the fallacy in your equivocation... ...an equivocation that is perhaps more suitably connected to your 'math' since 1) you claim "math is repeated addition". WRONG! it is MULTIPLICATION that is repeated addition. 2) you are repeating how Terrence defines multiplication: what number is added with itself how many times (heck even Howard states that "multiplication is just exaggerated addition in his Oxford address). this means 2 x 3 would be 2 + 2 + 2 + 2 by YOUR definition (pay attention to how many + there are. it hints how much addition have been performed). that is because 2 x 3 is: (in your own words) first number i.e. 2 and it is added the number of times i.e. 3 times. ergo: 2+2 (added ONE time) + 2 (added 2nd time) + 2 (added 3rd time). this produces 2 + 2 + 2 + 2 (count how many 2's been written since "ergo". by your definition: 2x3 = 2+2+2+2 = 8... you failed to realise "number 2 appearing 3 times" is not the same as "number 2 and it is added (with itself) 3 times" yet again we have someone besides howard, demonstrates this is a semantics problem in both case 1) and 2) rather than a math issue. at least howard got it wrong because his definition is wrong. his logic after that is still sound....but how did YOU get 6 despite getting your verbal description of a symbolic equation (aka definition) wrong? if your premise is wrong, your conclusion will always be wrong. unless you failed to follow a logical flow.
Terrance Howard is so smart. Surely he must have breezed through school astonishing his teachers à la the fictional child genius "Mary Adler" from the movie "Gifted," or "Big Bang Theory" "Sheldon Cooper," or Matt Damon's character in "Good Will Hunting" --- or real-life-types like Leonhard Euler, Isaac Newton, or John von Neumann. He must have completed high school by age 12, and got his bachelor's degree at 14, and PhD from MIT or Cal Tech by 16, right? By now, he's probably already been awarded the Fields Medal -- and the Nobel Prize twice. Looks like Terry is modest because we don't see his mentioning any of these accomplishments, and we find nothing online about his vast academic achievements. Yes, he's obviously quite modest --- he has a lot to be modest about. Terry is the quintessential poster boy for the "Dunning-Kruger effect" -- the dumber a person is about a subject, the smarter he thinks he is. He's worth about as much time and effort as it takes for me to hit the "delete" button my keyboard.
I got to admit, watching him spout utter nonsense and thinking that 'speaking in tongues' like he does is meaningful in any way, is very hilarious. I really believe that that guy has the typical traits of a very very dangerous person. Or a lunatic if you want. He is narcissistic, delusional, has a God complex and thinks he can "kill" humanity. Any psychiatrist will tell you that this guy needs to either be admitted of be on some heavy medication. If this keeps up, eventually he'll get a meltdown and harm himself or worse, someone else. (Simply put : a dangerous nutjob)
Almost 19 minutes...just go: "I have a bucket of lobsters, if I reach in one time a grab a lobster and put it on the table, how many lobsters did I put on the table?" -One. "If I do the same two more times, how many lobsters did I put on the table?" -Three. "So why are there only two lobsters on the table?" -One is in the pot...I'm hungry...
He’s been broken by complex numbers, it’s not uncommon. As soon as a person asks themselves “How can -1 be complex AND imaginary? If it’s imaginary then it can be whatever I decide it is, and so I imagine it like this: bollox” and the journey down the rabbit hole of delusional misunderstanding is a predictable one that the idiot can no longer see because he’s also under the misapprehension that nobody else ever had this “epiphany” before because when he researched it, there was absolutely no mention of it - a simple mistake for simple people to make. I’ll be referring to this as Terry-shit-a load-of-verbal-diarrhoea-into-an-infinite-loop with a net gain of -1, or, the “nothing positive will ever come from this” non-paradox. Good luck to the plum and his Nobel Carrot Award.
Not defending him but… I think we have to accept that while not all conspiracy theories are real… in the last couple of years some of them have proven to be true 😅
The issue is both conspiracy theorists and ones who don't believe in them both act as if there needs to be some deep Hollywood production type of secrets from "intellectual geniuses" and claim the government is dumber or smarter than they really are The Abu Gharib scandal happened because of extremely shitty people who could of cared less if they were caught cause Merrca and the FBI investigated just let them to keep being shitty so they can get the federal charges and un charges to stick and they caught them The people guilty weren't some "illuminati satanists", "right wingers" or "left wingers" they were just shitty people who happened to be military personnel
Such as? Name a few examples, because as far as I know, no conspirancy of such absurd calibre has ever been proven to be true. Saying that the government lied about money being invested in healtcare while instead giving it to fund the military is an example of what could be called a conspirancy theory, yet nowhere near as something like terriology which literaly says all physics, mathematics, logic and pretty much reality iteself is completely different. When you have something of this scale you just know its wrong, while we can't know eveything with 100% certainty, we know somethings with 99% certainty which is the same. We know that everything could be, but we also know that somethings are and some arent and Terryology is part of the latter
I knew Howard's arguments were doomed at the beginning as soon as he said that multiplication "increases" the amount. "0.5 x 0.5 = 0.25" does not show an increase. There is "Univ of Chicago" and "U of Illinois at Chicago (UIC)," but no "Chicago University". His treatise really should have been copy-edited before being released to anyone to peer review.
Wrong answer. Your calculations shows a literal increase. In order for there to be no increase 0.05 needs to be multiplied by 1. That will equal 0.05 let that sink in.
@@johnjordan8022 Are you using the term "increase" in an absolute value sense in the same way that deceleration is just a negative acceleration? I'm trying to honestly understand your point.
@@bloemundude if you loan me 5 dollars and told me to pay you back 5 times that amount ( 5 x 5 ) I will be paying you back 25 dollars. That is a increase. If you told me to pay you back 1 times the amount of 5 ( 5 x 1 ) I would simply be giving you your 5 dollars back. No increase there. In order for there to be no increase in multiplication you must multiply by Zero or One. Make sense now ?
I would explain it to him this way: Multiplication basically means “How many of these are there?” So the second 1 in ‘1x1’ denotes how many of the first number (in this case, 1) we have. In other words, 1x1 means: “There is one instance of the number 1.” Ergo, the answer is simply 1. 1x2, by comparison, is saying: “There are two instances of the number 1.” Ergo, the total is 2.
1x1=1 can be perfectly explained using real life examples. #1 If my boss asks me to work one hour of overtime just this one time, how many hours of overtime do I prepare myself to work? Not two. #2 If I give Terrance a 1 dollar coin, just one time. Have I given him one or two coins?
The scary part is that whenever TH passes there will be millions of people who swear that he knew the truth and his death was to hide the truth from coming out and they will say it’s all for money or something vague and ambiguous.
Actually that's making the same mistake as Terrence, in ignoring potential polysemy with regards to the word "woman" which could potentially mean different things in different contexts.
He is incredibly conspiritorial. When his laptop didn't work during Joe Rogan's podcast, he openly blamed "them". I'm not sure if he elaborated on who "they" are.
that really happened? LOL I personally know a guy that I consider very intelligent, way above average. The problem is he's isolated himself for the last 10 years or so, hardly socializing or getting out of his bubble, the result is he's today a full conspiracy theorist (man never went to the moon, chemtrails, vaccines, holocaust didn't happen, north korea is great, etc. I'm surprised he's not a flat earther but that could be next). My point being that I think conspiracy nuts frequently have some kind of serious social problem, because of that they sour and get angry at everything and consequently they become easy targets for all kinds of nonsense, some more unbelievable than others.
@@MrDantres I'm convinced those people know they're not intelligent so they say such outlandish shit because they know you won't even indulge them. Then they say since they stumped you they must be right. It makes them feel smarter for a few fleeting seconds until the grim reality of their stupidity crashes down upon them again. My father used to do that. He'd say the dumbest things so you just give up. You can't argue with an idiot.
Nope, you can belive all kinds of stuff that others dont, and still have a bunch of friends that like you, meet new people that genuinely are attracted to your personality. And enjoy your prospective, even if they dont agree with you. Im sorry you meet weird people who cant express them selfs in a natural productive fasion.
@@MrDantresBRO! Not only did he not elaborate on who “they” are, he was directly asked by Joe, ver batem, “who is ‘they?’” Howard fumbled his words, spoke in sentence fragments about “the people who have always…corporations…There has always been someone….” Then changed the subject.
There's something that bothers me about the Terrence situation, why are tech industry giants buying his patents? Some being in use already. I find the whole hair pulling between mainstream modern science and Terrence's metaphysics pointless, but the patent thing is telling of something and i don't think people are paying enough attention to it.
So black people who put their country first have problems with nomenclature of mathematics. Not sure you know what you're saying. More in line with far left academia, which isn't really academia.
@RaccCity55. They can be. The Nation of Islam , Black Hebrew Israelites, 5% percent group are some examples of Black Nationalists in America. Rastafarians from Jamaica are another. They all tend to have distorted historical viewpoints
I would add that it is not a conspiracy theory, rather it is a conspiracy postulation. Correct me if I'm wrong, but an actual theory requires hard evidence to support its claims. At best, many of what people widely call "conspiracy theories" are conspiracy hypotheses.
Neil DeGrasse Tyson recently put out a video detailing how Terry had sent him his paper and Neil actually reviewed it. He was being brutally honest about the flaws and jumps of logic, while also praising Terry for the artwork of his Terryhedrons. Terry did not take the criticism well and basically told the world on the Joe Roegan podcast that Neil had crapped all over his ideas.
Don't give much credence to a man who thinks you can be a man or a woman based on how you feel on a particular day or time. But he is probably right doesn't take a keen mind to see Terrance is full of it his very premise is wrong.
@@DustinDonald-cz9otI was going to say that same thing. Beware appeals to authority logical fallacies. Neil may be very intelligent, but his "hot takes" have become increasingly ideologically driven as opposed to actual data driven science.
@@rext3404 Niel is the perfect case study in how popular science (or more accurately, the Cult of Scientism) has been bought and paid for using narcissistic actors with dubious credentials.
Simple explain: take (N number of things) x (N number of times) = N, In other words if you take £1 from a pile, 1 amount of times, you'll have £1. If you take £1 from a pile 2 times, you'll have £2.....and so on.
I'm not a mathematician not a scientist but every time I hear Terrence Howard speak about this ,the words bullsh*t n narcissist illuminates in my brain😂😂
Did he emphasize his self value to anyone that he wants to claim self significant above others he's just explaining some things that I even don't even know he didn't even force anyone to believe in him but the guy is thinking outside of the box
@@justinkurtrivera2315 you got to listen to him a lot more you'll start to see the arrogance and the narcissism come out , I had the same thoughts that you did when I first heard him speak and then I was like oh this is interesting! then I start listening to him more and I'm like nah this guy is suspect ! He's either just that much of a narcissist or he is just a intelligent nut job
@@justinkurtrivera2315 Not to be rude here justin, but the only type of person that cannot see the very obvious underlying narcissistic traits in terrance, are the uneducated people who actually think hes saying somthing of value because hes spitting out some big words that they dont personally understand. You said it yourself, you dont understand what hes saying, and yet you assume hes smart regardless, despite watching a video that details for you why hes wrong, your still here acting all bamboozled. Id strongly encourage you to work on practicing some healthy skepticism. The ability to identify bullshit, understand the scientific method, distill misinformation, ect.. Terrance is not a genius...maybe watcu this video again if your still confused....or actually study some of the things you claim to not understand but choose to believe in regardless..
You know we are in the era of Idiocracy when people look up to this guy as a mathematical genius. I’m sure Princeton is now considering awarding Albert Einstein’s chair in Physics at the Institute for Advanced Study to Kanye West
Although I highly doubt that I could ever express it with anywhere near the same eloquence, and I don't have a Master full knowledge of linguistics I do have what you might call an OCD about correct expression when expressing one's opinion about any number of topics. I find myself inadvertently correcting those around me in an attempt to extend their ability to have the same correct expression in achieving the points they wish to get across. I think this facet of my life is what draws me to your channel and achieves the level of enjoyment that I hardly get with other forms of content that neither server linguistic purpose nor have the knowledge of linguistics to express what they're trying to convey as much as yourself. I sincerely appreciate the way you took "Terryology" to task and served it a good note of actual perceivable knowledge. Excellent job I really enjoyed it. Brian in Tucson Arizona USA
Jesus Christ this comment sounds like it was made by Terry himself in a desperate attempt to sound smarter than those around him.. "im so smart i correct those around me and I have no idea why no one invites me to parties anymore!" 🙄
Working as an auditor/accountant for Terrence or taking his order in a restaurant must be an absolute nightmare, unless you can use Terryology against him and have him pay you double.
Terrence Howard is either doing some next level method acting as a conspiracy theorist or he really just lost his mind. I am betting on the second one, however would be really funny if the first thing come out true (most likely won't).
Or he just wants to make money. Creates controversy. Writes a book. Sells a book. Makes money. Writers make 10-15% of the book sales. Millions of books mean millions of $.
I'm amazed I'm alive at a time when anybody (even if just 20 people) believe this... I'm utterly stunned that enough believe this, to justify the effort of a debunking.
thanks for your precious work M. Surprised you did not mention Russell, who used words to consolidate the foundations of maths, with Whitehead,. the squared root loop is real as other wonders pullable from irrationals, as the squared of zero getting very close to the amount of atoms in our observable universe, in negative ex. I love you going this path. You are a treasure and a blessing for all who have the chance to get this. Thanks Metatron.
If you wish to support my work and help me continue to tell it how it is, please consider supporting my work on Patreon www.patreon.com/themetatron
Join this channel to get access to more old school Metatron videos the algorithm wouldn't prioritize! Support freedom and get your prefered content!:
ua-cam.com/channels/IjGKyrdT4Gja0VLO40RlOw.htmljoin
How much did Big Maths pay you to make this video?
1x1= 1^2 ;)
Conspiracy theories........ Once Flat Earth was normal and globe was a conspiracy theory. Dinosaur fossils were conspiracy theory. Government and companies spying through ur devices were a conspiracy theory. Now UFO is transitioning from conspiracy theory to mainstream. Don't let ur dogma prevent u from expanding ur mind.
@metatronyt you mistook “causal” for “casual”. Twice.
Is it a coincidence that Polysemic rhymes with schizophrenic?
"Am I a recovering alcoholic or am I afraid of ghosts?"
Somehow I enjoy this very much.
In either case never cross beams or streams.
As a recovering ghostaholic who's afraid of alcohol, I can agree.
Clothes don't die.
Ghosts aren't ghosts.
It's what alcoholics should do in both cases!
You could be both.
Now I get why Howard was replaced by Don Cheadle in the MCU. He constantly complained about Tony's armor not being scientifically accurate according to his irrefutable research 😂😂😂
That's not why.... and Cheadle is a bigger idiot than Howard and any random idiot..... Ruffalo let's say..... combined.
Seriously?! 😮
Dude has some issues.
Wasn't he got fired because he wanted more money than RDJ's for Iron Man 2?
Well, he was replaced because Perlmutter found his contract too expensive for a supporting actor, but yeah, they narrowly dodged a major bullet.
@@twincast2005
As much as I don't like Howard as a person, I find his portrayal of Rhodey considerably better than Cheadle's, ngl
Terrance really took it hard when he was replaced in Iron Man...
Narcissistic collapse
😭😭😭💀
he's a real life Tony Stark! just wait, he's gonna invent an arc reactor any day now XD
He wasnt replaced he just left himself cuz he thought they werent paying him enough
@@olorin3815 then they hired another actor to play the same role. In other words, he was replaced.
I never said he was fired.
Somebody showed him a party math trick and bro thought he’d unlocked a secret to the universe
That guy is high all the time and he was amazed by his stupid idea, that's all.
@@koja69
if what you mean by "high all the time"? Is that he so lacked sufficient oxigen at birth that it so effected his effective IQ that he now has the aproxamit brain power of an ameba?... then... okay
I thought the calculator would spell BOOBS.
Math trick?
More like meth trick. More than once.
In fact, so many times that his brain went to the gutter
i like howard's concept of 0. if i take all his money, then he still has all his money and can't sue me for theft.
If you punch him in the face it doesn't matter since the energy is all still there in the universe, thermodynamics and stuff...
That was my thought exactly! I bet he'd sing a whole new tune about "0" if he did a movie and when it was time to get paid they wrote him a check for "$0.00"! Or if they filled out with the words "All the money in the universe is IN the universe so we all have all of it"
Nothingness makes no sense in quantum physics as nothingness isn't even a thing so comparing it to money isn't a good comparison.
@nawzy202 at a minimum it's as good a comparison as an apple...
@@monkkeye howard did compare it to an apple tho.
"2+2=6
There are two twos so there is an aditional two that NO ONE TALKS ABOUT CUS THE GOVERNMEN-"
Terryology is giving me these vibes lol
Half life 3 confirmed vibes
Turns out a ton of "cuz the government" stuff turned out to be true in the last 10 years. Maybe amend your comment to the more accurate "there's an additional two BECAUSE THE WHITE MAN...." Way more contemporary.
😂😂
ah you mean 22 🤣🤣🤣🤣
Yeah, because of silent +2😅
"In May 2024, Howard was a guest at The Joe Rogan Experience, where he attempted to debunk the Pythagorean theorem, claimed he can kill gravity, said he does not believe in the number zero, and claimed he remembers the events of the day he was born" may be the funniest sentence on all of Wikipedia
Big deal.
Now if he remembers the events of the day he was CONCEIVED then I'll be impressed.
@@rsrt6910don't give him any ideas xD next up, "I remember fighting with other sperm cells"
@@Sawarynk"I was actually holding the snack tray"
Doesn't believe in zero?? FFS that's pre medieval thinking 😅 I will not make a comment about stereotypes, I will not make a comment about stereotypes 😅
It was funnier when he claimed some elements have a “bisexual tone”.
To be fair 'proving him wrong' is like proving water is 'wet'...
The human body is not capable of experiencing "wet" only hot or cold.
@s. muller8688 However, ‘wet’ exists in the absence of humanity. So that doesn’t counter that water is ‘wet’
@@s.muller8688 R/woosh
Is water wet? It *makes* things wet, but is it, itself, capable of making its own entity wet? "Wet" is the state of being covered/soaked in a liquid, but water isn't covering or soaking anything, it simply is.
@@chaosgyrothe wat in water is the same word as wet
"And I can't believe I have to say this..."
A statement made in every rebuttal of Terence Howard that I have seen in the past 4 weeks.
No math knowledge x No linguistic knowledge = Terryology
Look at how this man of.......yeah, nah, not gonna go there or I get banned, but you catch my meaning
He does have some math knowledge. He was using some popular high school equations to pretend like he was impressive to the mathematically average Joe Rogan team. Like how he memorized some of the numbers he gave at the end.
But ultimately he's a fool and if he spoke to anyone with the talent stack for math, philosophy, and language. . .or simply someone with a strong grasp of language and debate (with a slight dabble in to philosophy), he would get destroyed very quickly, like how Metatron ripped him apart here. I noticed his language problem immediately. His whole conspiracy theory is based on a false premise. If he's serious about it, it's sad he's gone down such a rabbit hole in his own mind and wasted so much time over nothing.
@@Trapster99 They are known for conspiracy theories, though usually isn't about other types of people that are unlike him, rather than numbers, if you get my meaning.
@@snakeplissken7671I don't think Howard uttered a single correct, coherent sentence but it's not like I hung on every second of the interview. I do hope if there's one interview that ruins Jo Rogan this should be it.
I actually started as a fan of Rogan back in the day. Solely because he was a sober, rational voice of reason. (I know it's really hard to believe now) Before dangerous misinformation became a legit, respected political stance.
Also no knowledge in any logical reasoning at all.
Winning an argument with a stupid narcissist is impossible
The narcissistic personality disorder might just be a comorbidity of his delusional disorder. He is pretty much a textbook megalomaniac, but he has persecutory delusions as well. You are right, though. There is no point arguing with someone like him. He's mentally incapable of admitting he's wrong. It's like arguing with a Flat Earther. The blend of condescension and ignorance is unbreakable.
Facts
yet so many people will be enamored by him because they appeal to his confidence.
There’s other diagnoses in psychology than NPD.
This is much closer to schizotypal personality disorder, an entirely different cluster.
He isn’t stupid. He expresses himself well, is curious, reads. But he is capable of making and accepting associations that the average person would exclude. Much like the schizophrenic, he sees conspiracies.
He has a genuine good faith conviction in a complex system of thoughts which has no grounding in reality.
Imagine if you had the power to complete a jigsaw puzzle by effortlessly pushing incompatible puzzle pieces together.
@@Roke1222 I have experienced a type of madness like this after getting a Rx for weed. And it was a little more intense than just being paranoid. It was like reorganizing reality. I'm not sure how much of it was psychedelic but all I can say is the only thing that helped me was asking help from God. So I get it that a lot of people dont believe in an unseen world because they have not had any experience which justify that idea.. I have.
So when I see people like T. Howard.. I remember my demons. How I felt intoxicated, it was confusing but it satisfied my desire to be plugged into something interesting. Idk that me saying this will mean anything to anyone unless they experienced something very similar where the creepy stuff wasn't just on the inside (inner voice) but also the outside, other people behaving oddly.
He never recovered from Robert Downey Jr getting all the fame from Ironman.
Or Hugh Jackman Screaming In His Face😂😂
@@jamichealruiz lmao fact I forgot about that
@@SoldierSpiderx 😂😂😂😂
@@jamichealruiz lmao if he just kept his mouth shut and check his ego he would been in the Marvel universe already but he just keep talk shit
@@SoldierSpiderx Facts💯His Words Hold No Meritt All Bark No Bite🤦🏽♂️
I was hoping that at the end of the calculator segment, he told everyone, "Now, hit Enter. Hold it upside down. What do you see? It spells 'Boobs'. Thank you, I'll be here all week."
🤣🤣🤣🤣
best comment so far lol.....
Try the fish.
or 1134 Hell.
😂😂
I remember in primary school, I was taught that multiplication using terms like groups.
You have 2 groups of 2 apples. How many apples do you have in total? Awnser 4 apples.
Now, if I were to write this sentence as 1*1, it would be: you have one group of one apple. How many apples do you have?
That guy just proved why those long wordy questions in math are actually important.
And 0 ? Can you have a group of 0 apples?
@@lenahandsen6836 bruh lol you're focusing on the word "group" too hard. A "group" of zero apples is just zero apples, obviously.
@_simplyjake_ I thought that was obvious as well. A group of 0 is 0.
Although, technically, 0 is not a group given the meaning of the word, but in this context, I think it works.
@@lenahandsen6836 replace the word group with the word bucket, you can have a bucket with two apples in it, a bucket with one apple, and a bucket with no apples in it. How do you like them apples.
I was taught multiplication is multiples. 1 multiple is just 1.1 in multiples of 2. 1 in multiples of 3. Or 1×1, 1x2, and 1x3. A multiple of zero then would be zero with the idiot above trying to do some stupid gotcha.
I always have one thing in mind about actors - when they don't have a script, even the likable ones sometimes turn out to be incredibly dumb.
Not always.
It's like they say about never meeting your heroes... especially if you've made the mistake of making an actor one of them.
There a lots of very intelligent actors through out the ages and lots of bad behaviours as well.
@@zaco-km3su He didn't say always. He explicitly says "sometimes". I'm not so kind, I would say "most often". But not even that equals to "always".
Well, a significant number of them are high school dropouts. So combine that with a very inflated sense of self-worth due to the nature of their job and you're bound to get a lot of wackos.
I Think people love to witness situations like this because deep down, they want to feel ‘empowered.’ They perceive the ‘academic’ as being wrong, while the person who doesn’t conform to rules or follow conventional paths is seen as smarter, even a ‘genius.’ It’s reminiscent of 80s movies where an ordinary individual triumphs over Olympic champions and achieves the seemingly impossible. There’s a sense that perhaps, even without formal study, training, or effort, they too can succeed.
Which movie?? Sounds interesting!
It is exactly this. Especially because the world is really great at financially rewarding horrible behaviors and personalities, meanwhile 'smart' people are chained to a desk for their whole life to make like triple minimum wage. ... We create a lot of rules, rule breakers tend to be the most successful because they dont settle for scraps like the rest of us.
@@Ma_nerd I was actually talking about this "genre" of movies, like:
Red Dawn - A bunch of American teenagers fights against a Soviet invasion in their hometown,
Karate Kid - an ordinary teenager, learns a few tricks from Mr. Miyagi and defeats the much better trained Johnny Lawrence.
Rocky series - Rocky Balboa faces and defeats much stronger and more aggressive opponents.
@@RodrigoCorreia2099 I mean, in fairness, an ordinary bunch of Afghan goat herders beat the most technologically advanced military the world has ever seen. And, just a few decades after they beat the Soviets, to boot.
@@J5L5M6but they didbt tho. We were only there to get the oil , and the heroin control shit enough to do that and put in a regime to gaurd and run the poppy fields for us. Missuin accomplished.
It really surprises me how people believe in apparently complex scientifical "theories" made up by people whose job is to pretend to be someone else in front of a camera that have no formal education in math or science. Actors are overrated
Your comment made me think of Ricky Gervais when he hosted the Golden Globes and used some of that to tear actors apart for thinking they're as important as doctors and engineers 😂
It's a problem that is getting worse and worse thanks to influencers and their... influence on the younger generation. Terrance is barely on the top of the iceberg when it comes to insane things these people are trying to push on the young. Tiktok and media platforms like it has to be age restricted and our school system needs to be brought back in line, don't let the inmates run the asylum.
Some actors are very smart. They appear to be the exception to the rule.
The Roman empire had it right.
@@fibanocci314exactly. The exception that proves the rule.
The more I hear from Terrance Howard, the more I realize why the MCU dumped him for Don Cheadle
Which is funny because Cheadle is a bigger idiot than Howard and any random far left Hollywood fool combined.
He did the math and thought his salary should add up to equal to or greater than Robert Downey Jr. since he was the one that really made the first Iron Man movie work. At least his math and logic skills remain consistent . . .
Right, 'cause don cheadle isn't a twat.
I don't know, what the reason was but you don't get kicked out of hollywood because you're insane.
You get hired because of it.
@@unitron2005 Being easy enough to work with or having massive star-power are literally the only 2 things Hollywood cares about. Howard has none of those.
You're right that being nice means little to nothing when massive divas like Bale or Norton get pretty good work consistently.
@RaccCity55Rhodie in Iron Man 1, and only that movie
I kinda wondered how this guy managed to get fired from an otherwise unfireable job as one of the Avengers. Now i realize that "contract dispute" was code for "this guy is nuts and makes us uncomfortable."
😂😂😂
100%
How did you come to the conclusion that he had a job or that his job as an actor in a movie made him immune to termination or being fired? Even with a contract, there are clauses that would allow a studio or employer to terminate an actor for violation of said clauses. If he displayed THEN the absolute lunacy that he’s displaying NOW, I’m sure that even if he hadn’t violated any part of his contract, they’d rather just pay him to go away verses dealing with his clear mental health issues.
@@mjallen1308 bro.. he spoke in a slight hyperbole regarding the fact that obviously marvel studio would much prefer to continue with the same actors as they make their movies. It takes quite a bit for them to part ways with an actor, and its not unreasonable to be surprised even terrance managed to cross whatever line they have.
Don't be a youtube comment literalist printing out paragraphs just for the sake of an argument..
They dropped Majors fast as hell.
When I was a kid, we learned that the multiplication symbol could be replaced with the word “of”. Therefore, 1x1 can be explained as 1 of 1. 1x2 can be explained as 1 of 2, etc, etc…… it’s elementary.
In theory, we could redefine multiplication as something else in another mathematical system, but we generally use the system we're using now because it's the most useful one.
Yes but he has genetically low intelligence.
So then what would be the answer of two of two because if one of then two of two would be two , where am I wrong...
Because.
2 of is still speaking in a singular term about the double identification.The number two that's the double identification...
It's 2 things being represented by one word a double identification. So if you have two of two you still just have two...
So under the Current multiplication theone of 12 of 23 of three would all equal the number they started with 12 and three...
@@Bryanth-996 Well, if you do math with, I dunno, little cards with numbers written on them, 2 of cards with the number 2 will make two cards. But this kind of "multiplication" would deal with entities of different order: one 2 would be a quantity, the other 2 would be a thing. Proper math deals with entities of the same order: both 2s must refer to quantity. So 2*2 would mean 2 of groups containing 2 cards.
Common language, of course, has other ways to put things, and that's why math uses the very strict and defined language of math, and what we get, especially as beginners, are translations. Translations are never perfect.
Really? So 2 x 6 is 2 of 6? 😄
Ok, so let me get this straight - if I take money from Terry's bank account and use it to buy a car, I haven't stolen the money, because the car is still his because it is in the same universe, so it is ok for me to drive it whenever I want.
Hey, everyone! Drinks are on Terry!
🤣🤣🤣 let's go!!
And you both still have the money! It’s a win for everyone! 😂😂😂
Genius.
Correct. The First Law of Thermodynamics doesn't lie.
Lol I had the same thought and made the same joke.
Seems they write themselves given how ridiculous his logic is.
If Archimedes used Terryology to try to frustrate the Romans, Syracuse would have fallen in 1 day.
Fun (false) fact: historians agree that the conflict between Athens and Sparta spurred from a conflict of theology. However what was less known is that Athenians purposefully used Terryology to aggrivate the Spartans so that they could claim that their rivals were "meat headed jocks"
They would have just died knowing that the human race was unworthy of existence.
Or Archimedes would have been crucified by his own people for being an idiot, before the Romans even got there...
Smart✅
Funny✅
Maybe look at a map...Rome is in Italy....Syracuse is in Greece. Not sure if Syracuse was still around during the Roman Empire....
I have gone even deeper beyond Terryology. He rejected all of my findings and I no longer support him.
Well done. Your a genius. I can prove it.
Champion of mankind 🎉
I still can't help but hope this Terrence guy is legitimate troll. Like in "Pinky & The Brain" show, where in one episode Brain explains his whole plan to recover the world, which includes "brainish" as global language.
@@utrock5067 oh, he'd become my favorite person on earth! But unfortunately I think he's as serious as a heart attack. Plus anyone who's ruined their reputation this bad would have came out by now. Mark my words: in a year he'll be in a Steven Seagal movie😂
@@theriffwriter2194I can't wait to see this gem 🤣
My math teacher explained multiplication this way: the first number is how many items are in each group, the second number is how many groups are present, the last number or answer is how many items are present. This made things so easy to visualize and understand. 😊❤
Bro doesn't understand math grammar.
1x1 is equivalent to saying "1 of 1". I have one set of 1, therefore I have 1.
5x10 is saying "5 of 10" and so having five 10's is lo-and-behold, 50. 🤯
Also you can multiply a number by .5 or something and it will always be less. How is it "multiplying" if it becomes less? Lol. I wondering if I his mind 10×0.5 is actually division in some weird way.
What almost everybody gets wrong, though, is claiming that three times *more than* 10 is 30, when that is linguistically illogical, and the correct way would be to say three times *as much as* 10.
"Three times less" is even more cringy and should be "a third as much".
7 of 9?
Every child is taught multiplication with groups of small items like M&Ms or something like that to make it understandable and completely unambiguous to even a child. Its sad and pathetic that this guy has failed so hard at something children can understand.
@@TyeDPod She has 1 set of 2.
When I was very young we learned that "1 x 1" means "Take 1, one time," which is inescapably 1. In all honesty? He sounds like he's on the spectrum. And, yeah, very possibly narcissistic.
His argument reminds me of when I was in first grade and got a problem wrong because of the term "borrow". I reasoned that when you borrow something you give it back, so I added more than I should. I'm on the spectrum, so I can see where a language issue can cause problems like that. However, that was back when I was in first grade, and I didn't conclude I was being lied to when I was told that was the wrong way to do it.
@@Cerebrum123 There are many, many people on the spectrum and that's how we make new inventions, or ideas/ways for others to follow. Some are called geniuses, some brilliant, etc., but just spectrum is not enough to make an error - there must be the lack of self-monitoring and abudance of a narcissist trait to it giving the outcome of a prototypical Dannig-Kruger effect. In short - a nut case.
This isn't autism it's schizophrenia
Why not both?
@@jtem9313 my comment was deleted for saying it's not aut it's schiz
Oh great its an L. Ron Hubbard situation again.
100%
Scientology: the Hotep Maths edition
Xenu;i heard that!
its nation of islam speak. look up Yakub😂. Its basicly super racist black scientology with islamic words jammed in.
Not exactly. Hubbard was a psychopath who studied black magic, Alistair Crowley, mental subjugation and also kidnapped, raped and abused several people.
i haven't looked at any formal definition of 'multiplication', but i've always saw it as a mathematical operation, specifically a shorthand for addition. the multiplicate is the instruction tells us how many times the original number has to be added to itself. and using the multiplication method results in the same outcome as adding method is the proof for my statement that multiplication is simply an addition instruction. eg. 1+1+1+1 = 4, while 1*4 = 4. i called it a shorthand because when you dealing with extremely large numbers, multiplication is significantly faster than adding them. easy to follow with whole numbers but multiplying by fractions... that's an additive instruction to add portions of the whole (fractions) to itself, which is a mind bender.
Me: Dude, he's not arguing math, he's arguing semantics
Metatron: His problem isn't with math, it's a Language issue
Me: METATRON GETS ME!!
That was obvious to anyone with a high school education, tbh.
@@bigguy7353 Yeah, a lot of us thought that but I don't think anyone has talked about it publicly till now.
Math is semantics. Semantics he doesn't understand.
Yes, but at the same time, he wants to change the rules of math, _based_ on those semantics.
basic common sense, congratulations.
Teacher: "2 x 0.5 = 1."
Terry: "NUH-UH! That didn't increase!"
Lol I wonder why no one has explained to him how 1x1=1 and the increase is 0 to 1. 🤦🏻♂️
@@ThomasBrenton-pk8gg I'm sure many people have but in response he accused them of being a part of the grand conspiracy to silence him and his ideas. Hell he did it in the joe rogan episode when talking about neil degrasse tyson
He could say that increased from 0.5 to 1. A better example would have been 0.5x0.5=0.25
@@alvarogoenaga3965 I can explain this to Howard and he would understand me. 0.5 X 0.5 increases in a different Universe. That 5 after the 0 lives separately from us. In that infinity 5 multiplies to 25, but for us it diminishes because it brings it further away from our reality. We live above 1, there is no zero in our reality, when you talk 0 to 1 that's a whole different infinite, similar to the quantum realm for us. So the more you dive into that infinity the further you get from our reality.
Proving this guy wrong isn't that hard.
Thats basically a tutorial dungeon.
Literal school children could debunk some of his "ideas" lmao.
@@seanrookeeI mean we all learned and understood how multiplication works as children. Terrance clearly doesn't understand how basic mathematics works.
It's basically equivalent to producing a shart.
I saw a comment saying
" isn't Terrance Howard a dumb actor? There must have been a dimension shift because he is now a genius"
Not thinking maybe he was smart all along or something but rather there was a Mandela shift in the universe and now the new Terry is a science genius.
Yes but proving it to HIM, would be almost impossible
13:40 That was not philosophy, that was sophistry.
He argued about ownership; his entire metaphysical babble was to create a magical gotcha that doesn't make any sense. For if everything's connected (in his meaning) then there is no giving or taking apples in the first place, yet he claims the other did not receive anything and he still has all the apples, which hints that is a solipsist (he believes, thinks, that only he exists and nobody else).
Howard just sounds like he's in a manic phase to be honest. He knows a lot of big words and thinks he alone knows the "truth".
Relatively smart guy that did too many psychedelics. 😂 also a very convincing actor.
@@BloodSweatandFears Seems entirely possible. Either way, he certainly likes to hear himself talk. 😂
@@BloodSweatandFears"smart" and "educated" are two completely different things here
@@granta3044 I agree.
@@BloodSweatandFears I actually like the man's acting. But yeah, he definitely went off the deep end with this crap. And it probably either had something to do with psychedelics or he just has a mental disorder. It's actually hard to tell which it is, but if he was acting that way on film sets I can see why his career took a dump... No one wants to hear all that nonsense when they're trying to get a job done.
I don't have any degree of hostility towards Howard, I just think he has a problem and needs some help.
How do you deflate such an ego? If a pin is required for a balloon, this guy needs a harpoon.
Also why i dont like watching these videos because they add nothing constructive once you see a single one.
I agree
I can get a degree in hostility ? Which college ? I could challenge that course right now ! lol
@@I_am_Diogenes I don't see any mistake in my sentence.
Celebrity × attention seeking = narrcisisim
Celebrity × attention seeking = 2.
No, it's more than attention seeking. He believes this stuff, listen to him. IT'S A CONSPIRACY, THEY AREN'T WRONG THEY'RE INTENTIONALLY LYING. He's schizophrenic and needs anti-psychotic medication.
Narcissism + Ignorance: dumb ideologies.
No. 🤑💰💸💰🤑💸💸💸🤑🤑🤑🤑🤑💰
They idea is to sell a book. He gets 10-15% of the sales. If he manages to sell millions of books he will make millions of $. He has to pay taxes on that too.
@@BandytaCzasu you beat me to it
One quirk of language that is fun is the word "or". Compare what "or" means in day-to-day language to what it means in formal logic: "or" is typically used as the formal "exclusive or" (XOR function in programming). Say you want to go to dinner, and you are given the option of pizza or tacos. You're not having both, and both you and the one giving you the choice know that. This is why jury instruction have to use "and/or" when applicable, and it annoys be when people act like "or" alone acts the same. Common language doesn't use words the same as formal logic.
Actually you made the same use of the common "or". "Am I a recovering alcoholic or afraid of ghosts?" You aren't expecting "yes" as an answer, though in either case you are avoiding a house because it's filled with spirits.
I never trust somebody who wears headphones on the outside of a hood.
There is one reasons why you would want to do that. Imagine you want silence, so you use NC headphones but you still hear faint white noise and and there is a pressure on your head. If you put fabric between the headphones and your ear that goes away.
@@_aullik simp
@@_aullik What?
@@_aullikyou sound as sane as Terrance
@@_aullik😂😂😂
It doesn't surprise me to see Terrence Howard saying this sh*t. Considering how he treated his first wife and that time he attacked a flight attendant just because she asked him not to get up when the seatbelt sign was on, it's clear that he's not the brightest lightbulb in the asylum. 😅
Being a violent drunk immediately conflates to far left intentional propaganda against western society? Ok.
I read an article about his second or third wife-his most recent one-said their relationship lacked romance. They never went out to dinner or had romantic evenings because she was constantly helping him cut out plastics for his models. He was obsessed with his theories and ideas, and his narcissistic behavior meant they never went anywhere. She spent so much time indoors helping him that she now believes she has agoraphobia. Their house was filled with plastics, and her life revolved around cutting out shapes for his models. After their divorce, which was finalized three to five years ago, she is now supposedly engaged *to him* again. It’s an unbelievable story!
@@Ameenah69 It's not just believable, that sort of nonsense the norm in Hollyweird.
Quite frankly I'd rather have Hollywood actors invent goofy bullshit math theories than do unspeakable things to children.
He's the sharpest crayon in the newsstand.
@@DingleBerry-jb4gj Well, there's that!
I've watched many different reaction videos regarding this fellow. You're break down is so well put together so well articulated and so well presented. It is head and shoulders above the rest. Please consider doing more breakdowns like this. It is very captivating and stimulating to watch.
You must enjoy language as much as I do because this was like watching the closing seconds of a championship game. Ha!
This is exactly the same argument I use against people using conspiracy theories to "debunk science." Without science, we wouldn't have got out of the stone age.
Before he failed math, he failed linguistics. Before he failed linguistics, he failed humility, the prerequisite of all learning.
Well said 🫡
I guess you're not a big fan of university grads, huh?
Terrence Howard is trying to figure out how Chuck Norris counted to infinity twice.
The real answer, count in turn, counting twice to infinity is trivial if you can count to infinity once.
We ALL are!
We ALL are!
😂😂
Was that Imaginary Infinity and Irrational Infinity?
My child is currently proving him wrong in year 2
Let's see it then
@@prophecygg5826Howard reminds me of those people that claim that math racist what shows they don't understand math and they don't understand the history of it and the thing is he and those people can prove to themselves that they're wrong simply by grabbing objects and utilizing reasoning if you have one set of one then you have one if two sets of two then you have four if you add two sets of two together you have four and so on and so forth it's easily proven that's why math is the truth in a commonality in every language in every culture
@@prophecygg5826 1x1=1
@@prophecygg5826are you saying you believe Terry?
@@prophecygg5826 wouldnt be hard
Terrence Howard having any impact on the future of space travel will be about the equivalent of Eric Cartman walking into NASA, and going up to a scientist working on a massive shuttle component, and just saying ‘Why don’t you move this… m’yaaaa, and then move this just a little - bit - over - m’yaaaaa, okay shit if I know what I did but if it works you’re f*ckin welcome, peace nerds!!’
He must be horribly scared of a „running nose“😂
where's it running off to????....
Well it’s still in the universe so he still has a nose
Because the noses are running everything? 🤡
@@siekensou77Nobody nose.
That man also really be scared by the holiday spirit...😂
When stupidity goes full circle and you think you're a genius.
Terrance use of language to "explain" his "theory" reminds me of flat earth wackjobs. They do the same thing.
Flat earthers are way worse. They deny math, gravity, physics, every science known to man, history and observable reality itself.
Except that Terrence isn’t a flat earther and flat earthers think Terrence is crazy lmao. They’re both insane
@@VonJay different brand of crazy
Are you more or less crazy when another crazy person calls you out?
Or is that just rival wings of the ward having a beef?
lol yeah, I noticed that too.
My favorite quote which I admittedly stole from another "Terrence is crazy" video is something like, "If you made one Iron Man movie and you were paid 1 million dollars for said Iron Man movie (i.e. 1x1), then you would have one..., er, uh, two million dollars, right Terrence? Better call the IRS!"
Something I've noticed is that certain people of, shall we say, lower than average intelligence seem to be unable to delineate between the thing that a given word describes, and the word itself. It seems to be an issue with abstraction.
In cases where the word is inadequate to describe the concept, their inability to understand concept and word as separate entities leads them to see the linguistic issues with the thing's descriptor as issues with the thing itself.
This would seem to flow from that source.
In this regard , there are some words in forgein languages that do not translate well into English.My dad was German.Sometimes he might come out with some saying, and I would ask what it meant.He would explain it, but depending on what the phrase was and words used , he would have to explain the meaning behind certain ones as they didn't really translate so he would try to give some examples.that would make sense to me a non speaker.
Kinda how moths fly into fire?
It’s like saying 1 + -5 = 6 because + means addition and “to make more of”.
Multiply is usually making more of something but not in absolutely every case. Times-ing or X is not necessarily “multiplying” or “making more of”, it’s
“if you were to have that number by another number that many _times_ what would it be?”
So if you have 1 only once, you still have 1.
I use, one of the digits represents how many boxes, the other is how many objects are in each box, you can switch them either way and it always works.
1x1=1 every time.
Terryology sounds like an obscure Yu-Gi-Oh card.
The art has an intense looking scientist running an advanced program with the result: 1×1=2
Or something from an Un- set in Magic.
It’s a trap card
@@ZaZaZoo22 and when its played, your opponent is sent to the Shadow Realm with every apple!
I thought it was a riff on liking Terry Pratchett lol
Brilliant breakdown! I've watched a lot of the "Terryology" debunking videos and they all were around the math's. This breakdown gives a lot of nuance to the linguistic portion of how Terrance Howard speaks and I think a lot of "Terryology converts" don't really understand language as well as they think. Great job!
This is the kind of crap I used to come up with on mushrooms when I was a teenager and then wonder why it didn't seem as insightful the following morning. Its appears Mr Howard hasn't come down just yet.
Yup, Terrence has never been the same after that heroic dose lol...
Over 10 years ago, when Terrence Howard was replaced in the Iron Man franchise, he was already insane and Terryology was already born. The man's original "theory" started because he couldn't conceive how 1+1=2 but 1x1 didn't equal 2. The man doesn't understand the simple difference between addition and multiplication.
He's a certified lunatic who lost a lucrative position in the Iron Man franchise by apparently demanding he get paid basically the same as the actor for Iron Man himself and wanting to spread the word of Terryology on set.
Also, why he didn't call it Terrencology instead, I will never understand.
I call it Methmetrics.
Wait. Dude who has serious problem with maths can tell if someone is getting paid more or less? How is that even possible?
But aside of that, it farther explains, why leftist kids are so dumb.
I think I figured him out. He’s dyslexic and thinks the + is an x and vice versa.
Terrance was offered for Iron man 2 a fraction of what he was offered for Iron man. Your stories about what was going on on set might have something to do with it. Also Don Cheadle was a batter actor and asked for less than half of what Howard for on Iron man 1.
I doubt they planned to pay him less for iron man 2 without any reason. Probably he would have had a lot less screen time in the sequel or other things were at play. He was probably insufferable and the production didn't consider his presence as important. Iron man was a giant hit, I don't buy the narrative in which the production played dirty. Imagine paying for having this clown around.
"if you had one healing potion in a game and use it, how many potions do youhave left?" would've been better than the apple thingy, but Terry would've said some shit like "because I drank it it's in my body and therefore I still have one" like an actual raving lunatic.
The apple was a perfectly fine analogy.
Howard is an idiot.
His implication is in fact that you have all apples at all times, which is asinine.
It's one of those things idiots say to appear deep and in tune, when in fact it's all just dumb.
An argument that would go on and on. If I rebutted that with:
"Yes, you drank the potion and it's in you, but technically it is no longer the potion due to the chemical changes going through the digestive system. So no---you don't have the 'potion' as it were, because NOTHING remains as it was once digested."
Then he would say: "But technically the potion is part of the chemicals in your digestive system, so it's still a potion..."
This is called "circular reasoning fallacy". And the foundation of "Terryology" is that. As long as the potion exists in ANY form, it's still a potion.
I'll have to try it with my GM next week and see if he allows it.
I was gonna make the same joke but you beat me to it.
It still works with an apple if you say that you ate it.
Though I wonder...if I went and stole his car and sold it, could I still claim to him that he didn't really lose it as it's still there in spirit?
What's frightening is that he might actually go for it.
@@yvonnewilson2242 it's more of a "moving the goal posts" fallacy
Your presentation was brilliant and concise, made more over impressive in that you employ a completely different science to debunk this theory. I am furthermore impressed that by the sound of your accent, I would guess that english isn't even your 1st language, yet your use of it was masterful. Hat's off to you Sir.
One off-topic story.
Terrence Howard acted in The Hunting Party with Richard Gere in Bosnia. A friend of mine was the assistant for him and Mr Gere. One day she called me to send her the contacts of music stores in my area, which would have some saxophones in store. I was a bit confused, I asked her if she was transfered into props department. She said no, but it was a long story. She said she bought all the saxophones in Bosnia and Croatia and she needed to find some more, quickly. Terrence Howard needed them, he gave a saxophone to every woman he f...ed.
If your wife or girlfriend has a saxophone, I would ask some questions....
LOL!
How yes no, sto bi rek'o legendarni Izet.
I can see it now. Terrance blowing on the sax and saying, "That's hydrogen, do you hear it! It's key of E! It's a bisexual note!"
@@Steve-ev6vx That's Terryfying!...yeah, pun intended.
all of them in croatia and bosnia? so potentially hundreds and hundreds? possibly nearly a thousand?
bs, terrence howard having time to meet, bring, have sex, finish up with a saxophone session and a place to fucking hold them all.
was she asking for music stores to buy a saxaphone for a girl terrence had sex with? yeah sure, but embellishing it into an economic boon for the saxophone industry in eastern europe is dumb
...Why is Metatron covering this? I'll take it. EDIT: Ah, so that's why. Linguistics, jumping into conspiracies lmao. Great vid.
13:53 Yeah, maybe if the professor had instead asked him how many Avengers movies he'd starred in he could have gotten through.
Why question why? Watch. Gain knowledge. If you're unreasonably questioning "why is so and so talking about this" you prime your mind to learn nothing. If you aren't interested, don't watch.
@@bigguy7353 ...Because we sub to certain channels for certain things? Also whooooosh.
@@bigguy7353what a pointlessly combative comment
@@publiusventidiusbassus1232 He's probably already in Terry's new cult.
He would probably argue that none (the number of films) isn't the same as zero, since semantics.
In other words "Terrence Howard doesn't know what words mean, so he gets everything wrong."
Him being a product of a modern education system that has a philosophy of ever changing definitions. What else do you expect?
@@Manco65 Most people are a product of modern education and you would agree that most of us know the basic math that Terrence gets wrong.
@@ne0nmancer Let me try to respond how Terrence Howard would. "What do you mean product? Do you see a barcode on my forehead? Do you see a discount tag on my caller? I am not a product because I am not for sale by retailer."
He is trying to make money. Creates controversy. Writes a book. Sells a book. Makes money. Millions of books sold means millions of dollars for him.
I would watch that show. Adult swim vibes.
Multiplication IS addition . Multiplication is an operation that represents the basic idea of repeated addition of the same number . like 1 x1 is 1 adding 1 times = 1 , 1x2 is 1 adding 2 times = 1+1 = 2
bruh
When Metatron read a part of Terrence's book, my eyes felt like they popped out of my head and switched places. That is how crossed-eyed and baffled I was when I was listening.
I have now a broken nose from facepalming with a frequency of 60Hz
"In the end the Party would announce that two and two made five, and you would have to believe it. It was inevitable that they should make that claim sooner or later: the logic of their position demanded it." -George Orwell, Nineteen Eighty-Four
Which is why I believe (attn conspiracy theory!) that ppl like Howard are used to identify people willing to believe literally anything. Because those are the cornerstone of every violent revolt.
Lmao, Howard aint a party hes 1 rich loser in his own vaccum. Calm down
We didn’t learn multiplication tables, we learned times tables. Maybe that’s just how we talked in Utah. But 1, 1 time is 1
In 3rd grade, it was "times tables" but later it was "multiplication tables". That's what I learned growing up in Utah.
You’re wrong
Perhaps if he used this wording he would get a more coherent answer
You don't call a group table.but it is what the × means
They were pretty much interchangeable terms when I was in school, we called it multiplication but we would say 9 times 9 when pronouncing the equation.
When Terrence says there is no such thing as ZERO, he means there's no such thing as "Nothing" with a big "N."
He says that because "Nothing," as the opposite of "Something," doesn't really exist.
Here's how set theory helps explain it:
- Imagine "Something" as a set that includes everything that exists, called S{all existence in here}.
- Imagine "Nothing" as a set that includes the absence of everything, called N{nothing in here}.
In set theory, even sets are things. So, set S{} is a thing, and set N{} is also a thing.
This means that set N{} (Nothing) is actually part of set S{} (Something) because it's a thing.
Now, according to set theory, an opposite set can't be part of the set it's opposing.
But since N{} is part of S{}, it can't really be the opposite of S{}.
This means that "Nothing" is actually a part of "Something" and not its complete opposite.
So, when Terrence says ZERO doesn't exist, he truly is wrong/misunderstanding his own reasoning because ZERO is actually a part of Something.
Since ZERO is defined as set N{} belonging to set S{}, ZERO does exist because it is a thing.
In short, "Nothing" with a big "N" can't oppose "Something," so "Something" exists by default, and "Nothing" doesn't.
1 * 1 is basically saying one group of one. Which will never equal two.
I am me, myself and I. Terryology’s linguistic premise clearly demonstrates that I am in fact three people. Case closed.
I’m wondering if he thinks 1x2=3, 1x3=4 and so on? I don’t think he understands that multiplication is shorthand for addition. A way of counting multiples.
He watched a 5 minute video about the first rule of thermodynamics, then got confused that he had an extra finger when working out the 1 times table.
The moment mr. Terriologius started asking his interviewers to define ''multiply'' you can already tell that this is all over him just misunderstanding an english word.
Oh, and Ugandan drone money.
The second term can be considered as simply the number of times you have the first term.
1 x 1 is a single time the first term.
If you have one apple 1 time, you have 1 apple, not two.
The worse thing is that this is so obvious but nobody points to him in those interviews.
even a little kid would laugh at him and tell him its wrong
So there's your ex calling you a narcissist, and then there's proper narcissism that's a real mental disorder. I think that because that word gets thrown around a lot people don't realise how serious it is and to just agree with everything Terrance is saying shows that no one close to him cares enough to get him the help he needs and that's really sad.
Who knew that the solution to cold fusion, faster than light travel, self-replicating nanites, male pattern balding and erectile dysfunction could all be solved by simply just agreeing that 1* 1 is equal to two
As an Asian, this insults me. 😂
Also, in a computer science way, math IS repeated addition as multiply is a recursive functiin. You add the sum of the expression you get when you take the first number and it is added the number of times (also another way to say multiply) represented by the second number . So 2 × 3 means 2 + 2 + 2 as two would appear 3 times. In the case of 2 x 1 ( x1 is the identity function) because it would be just the number itself 2. Multiplication is commutative so it will work the other way too... so 2 x 3 can also be 3 + 3 (3 appewring twice).
This is the result of DEI and common core math.
I would say you don't have to be asian nor a scientist to feel offended by what Terrence Howard says. 😅
And being a conceded idiot too.
I do agree, and I'll also say this is the result of being famous/wealthy, never being truly challenged in one's delusions. Or maybe people are so baffled by the nonsense he's spewing, they have no idea how to respond so they just grin and nod out of second hand embarrassment.
no need to push a message that clearly doesn't apply here due to Terrence Howard was long out of school when DEI is common place.
neither is your later accusation grounded, since common core math seeks to impart mostly fragmentation method into arithmetic while (to some people) needlessly overcomplicating the process.
yet it is not a fallacious approach. it differs from traditional method merely in its 'complex' approach. it still determines 17 x 6 to be 102. the difference is: it reaches the conclusion by fragmenting 17 x 6 into (10x6)+(7x6). the fact that it reaches the same arithmetic answer as traditional method proves the fallacy in your equivocation...
...an equivocation that is perhaps more suitably connected to your 'math' since 1) you claim "math is repeated addition". WRONG! it is MULTIPLICATION that is repeated addition.
2) you are repeating how Terrence defines multiplication: what number is added with itself how many times (heck even Howard states that "multiplication is just exaggerated addition in his Oxford address). this means 2 x 3 would be 2 + 2 + 2 + 2 by YOUR definition (pay attention to how many + there are. it hints how much addition have been performed). that is because 2 x 3 is: (in your own words) first number i.e. 2 and it is added the number of times i.e. 3 times. ergo: 2+2 (added ONE time) + 2 (added 2nd time) + 2 (added 3rd time). this produces 2 + 2 + 2 + 2 (count how many 2's been written since "ergo". by your definition: 2x3 = 2+2+2+2 = 8...
you failed to realise "number 2 appearing 3 times" is not the same as "number 2 and it is added (with itself) 3 times"
yet again we have someone besides howard, demonstrates this is a semantics problem in both case 1) and 2) rather than a math issue. at least howard got it wrong because his definition is wrong. his logic after that is still sound....but how did YOU get 6 despite getting your verbal description of a symbolic equation (aka definition) wrong? if your premise is wrong, your conclusion will always be wrong. unless you failed to follow a logical flow.
It's 2024, and we have to give every hypothesis attention, no matter how bizarre it is.
Terrance Howard is so smart. Surely he must have breezed through school astonishing his teachers à la the fictional child genius "Mary Adler" from the movie "Gifted," or "Big Bang Theory" "Sheldon Cooper," or Matt Damon's character in "Good Will Hunting" --- or real-life-types like Leonhard Euler, Isaac Newton, or John von Neumann. He must have completed high school by age 12, and got his bachelor's degree at 14, and PhD from MIT or Cal Tech by 16, right? By now, he's probably already been awarded the Fields Medal -- and the Nobel Prize twice. Looks like Terry is modest because we don't see his mentioning any of these accomplishments, and we find nothing online about his vast academic achievements. Yes, he's obviously quite modest --- he has a lot to be modest about. Terry is the quintessential poster boy for the "Dunning-Kruger effect" -- the dumber a person is about a subject, the smarter he thinks he is. He's worth about as much time and effort as it takes for me to hit the "delete" button my keyboard.
I can't agree with your very last statement, he is worth a lot more to me because he gives me good laughs.😂
@@PaTrick-cf6ev I like when he pulls out the toys he made and plays with them 😂
I got to admit, watching him spout utter nonsense and thinking that 'speaking in tongues' like he does is meaningful in any way, is very hilarious.
I really believe that that guy has the typical traits of a very very dangerous person. Or a lunatic if you want. He is narcissistic, delusional, has a God complex and thinks he can "kill" humanity. Any psychiatrist will tell you that this guy needs to either be admitted of be on some heavy medication. If this keeps up, eventually he'll get a meltdown and harm himself or worse, someone else. (Simply put : a dangerous nutjob)
Smarter than Donald Trump and more articulate than Joe Biden 🎉
@scotty430 just as smart as Trump, equally narcissistic
Thank God Winston of 1984 didn't have the "2+2=5" scene with Howard. He sure would have got at least two legs broken 😅
Well in Russia 2+2 = 6
Almost 19 minutes...just go:
"I have a bucket of lobsters, if I reach in one time a grab a lobster and put it on the table, how many lobsters did I put on the table?"
-One.
"If I do the same two more times, how many lobsters did I put on the table?"
-Three.
"So why are there only two lobsters on the table?"
-One is in the pot...I'm hungry...
He’s been broken by complex numbers, it’s not uncommon. As soon as a person asks themselves “How can -1 be complex AND imaginary? If it’s imaginary then it can be whatever I decide it is, and so I imagine it like this: bollox” and the journey down the rabbit hole of delusional misunderstanding is a predictable one that the idiot can no longer see because he’s also under the misapprehension that nobody else ever had this “epiphany” before because when he researched it, there was absolutely no mention of it - a simple mistake for simple people to make. I’ll be referring to this as Terry-shit-a load-of-verbal-diarrhoea-into-an-infinite-loop with a net gain of -1, or, the “nothing positive will ever come from this” non-paradox.
Good luck to the plum and his Nobel Carrot Award.
Not defending him but… I think we have to accept that while not all conspiracy theories are real… in the last couple of years some of them have proven to be true 😅
Except this guy is just dumb.
Labeling something as a conspiracy theory to shut down discussion hasn't worked in a long time since most turn out to be true lol
The issue is both conspiracy theorists and ones who don't believe in them both act as if there needs to be some deep Hollywood production type of secrets from "intellectual geniuses" and claim the government is dumber or smarter than they really are
The Abu Gharib scandal happened because of extremely shitty people who could of cared less if they were caught cause Merrca and the FBI investigated just let them to keep being shitty so they can get the federal charges and un charges to stick and they caught them
The people guilty weren't some "illuminati satanists", "right wingers" or "left wingers" they were just shitty people who happened to be military personnel
Irony is the conspiracy that Alex Jones is most well known for being crazy for, the gay frogs thing, is one of the few where he's right.
Such as? Name a few examples, because as far as I know, no conspirancy of such absurd calibre has ever been proven to be true. Saying that the government lied about money being invested in healtcare while instead giving it to fund the military is an example of what could be called a conspirancy theory, yet nowhere near as something like terriology which literaly says all physics, mathematics, logic and pretty much reality iteself is completely different. When you have something of this scale you just know its wrong, while we can't know eveything with 100% certainty, we know somethings with 99% certainty which is the same. We know that everything could be, but we also know that somethings are and some arent and Terryology is part of the latter
I knew Howard's arguments were doomed at the beginning as soon as he said that multiplication "increases" the amount.
"0.5 x 0.5 = 0.25" does not show an increase. There is "Univ of Chicago" and "U of Illinois at Chicago (UIC)," but no "Chicago University". His treatise really should have been copy-edited before being released to anyone to peer review.
Exactly what I thought
Wrong answer. Your calculations shows a literal increase. In order for there to be no increase 0.05 needs to be multiplied by 1. That will equal 0.05 let that sink in.
@@johnjordan8022 Are you using the term "increase" in an absolute value sense in the same way that deceleration is just a negative acceleration? I'm trying to honestly understand your point.
@@bloemundude if you loan me 5 dollars and told me to pay you back 5 times that amount ( 5 x 5 ) I will be paying you back 25 dollars. That is a increase. If you told me to pay you back 1 times the amount of 5 ( 5 x 1 ) I would simply be giving you your 5 dollars back. No increase there. In order for there to be no increase in multiplication you must multiply by Zero or One. Make sense now ?
I would explain it to him this way:
Multiplication basically means “How many of these are there?”
So the second 1 in ‘1x1’ denotes how many of the first number (in this case, 1) we have. In other words, 1x1 means: “There is one instance of the number 1.”
Ergo, the answer is simply 1.
1x2, by comparison, is saying: “There are two instances of the number 1.”
Ergo, the total is 2.
Yes. Multiplication is just a faster way to do long addition problems. It's how many TIMES you're adding the number to itself.
1x1=1 can be perfectly explained using real life examples.
#1 If my boss asks me to work one hour of overtime just this one time, how many hours of overtime do I prepare myself to work? Not two.
#2 If I give Terrance a 1 dollar coin, just one time. Have I given him one or two coins?
The scary part is that whenever TH passes there will be millions of people who swear that he knew the truth and his death was to hide the truth from coming out and they will say it’s all for money or something vague and ambiguous.
Eric Weinstein summed it up beautifully. "Terrence is what you get when you undermine truth to the point you cannot even describe what a woman is".
That doesn’t make any sense. When did he talk about women.
Actually that's making the same mistake as Terrence, in ignoring potential polysemy with regards to the word "woman" which could potentially mean different things in different contexts.
@@HansLemursonExcept woman doesn't have multiple meanings. A woman is a human female. That's it.
Trans "women" are not women
His "candle mirror" thing is what cracked me up the most.
Neil saying “you’re dumb af but your art is interesting” is my favorite.
He is incredibly conspiritorial. When his laptop didn't work during Joe Rogan's podcast, he openly blamed "them". I'm not sure if he elaborated on who "they" are.
that really happened? LOL
I personally know a guy that I consider very intelligent, way above average. The problem is he's isolated himself for the last 10 years or so, hardly socializing or getting out of his bubble, the result is he's today a full conspiracy theorist (man never went to the moon, chemtrails, vaccines, holocaust didn't happen, north korea is great, etc. I'm surprised he's not a flat earther but that could be next). My point being that I think conspiracy nuts frequently have some kind of serious social problem, because of that they sour and get angry at everything and consequently they become easy targets for all kinds of nonsense, some more unbelievable than others.
"they" is the deep state and other world leaders that are VERY VERY hard to find the names out. The ones that tell the Rothschilds what to do.
@@MrDantres I'm convinced those people know they're not intelligent so they say such outlandish shit because they know you won't even indulge them. Then they say since they stumped you they must be right. It makes them feel smarter for a few fleeting seconds until the grim reality of their stupidity crashes down upon them again. My father used to do that. He'd say the dumbest things so you just give up. You can't argue with an idiot.
Nope, you can belive all kinds of stuff that others dont, and still have a bunch of friends that like you, meet new people that genuinely are attracted to your personality. And enjoy your prospective, even if they dont agree with you.
Im sorry you meet weird people who cant express them selfs in a natural productive fasion.
@@MrDantresBRO! Not only did he not elaborate on who “they” are, he was directly asked by Joe, ver batem, “who is ‘they?’”
Howard fumbled his words, spoke in sentence fragments about “the people who have always…corporations…There has always been someone….” Then changed the subject.
There's something that bothers me about the Terrence situation, why are tech industry giants buying his patents? Some being in use already. I find the whole hair pulling between mainstream modern science and Terrence's metaphysics pointless, but the patent thing is telling of something and i don't think people are paying enough attention to it.
my guy tech giants buy thousands of patents a day and the majority turns out to be bad or useless it means nothing
If mental gymnastics was a person:
Howard is a black nationalist. His views are common among them
So black people who put their country first have problems with nomenclature of mathematics. Not sure you know what you're saying. More in line with far left academia, which isn't really academia.
What is a black nationalist and do you mean they all believe in fake math?
Waiting for BLM to say the whyte man is oppressing black academia 😂
@RaccCity55. They can be. The Nation of Islam , Black Hebrew Israelites, 5% percent group are some examples of Black Nationalists in America. Rastafarians from Jamaica are another. They all tend to have distorted historical viewpoints
@jeffslote9671 Don't forget Hoteps.
Terrence believes that planets poop out their moons, how insane can you be, the extreme version of dunning kruger
Kruger Dunning effect is so Obvious In today's world so blatantly
Moon poop would be a killer band name.
I would add that it is not a conspiracy theory, rather it is a conspiracy postulation. Correct me if I'm wrong, but an actual theory requires hard evidence to support its claims. At best, many of what people widely call "conspiracy theories" are conspiracy hypotheses.
Neil DeGrasse Tyson recently put out a video detailing how Terry had sent him his paper and Neil actually reviewed it. He was being brutally honest about the flaws and jumps of logic, while also praising Terry for the artwork of his Terryhedrons.
Terry did not take the criticism well and basically told the world on the Joe Roegan podcast that Neil had crapped all over his ideas.
Don't give much credence to a man who thinks you can be a man or a woman based on how you feel on a particular day or time. But he is probably right doesn't take a keen mind to see Terrance is full of it his very premise is wrong.
@@DustinDonald-cz9otI was going to say that same thing. Beware appeals to authority logical fallacies. Neil may be very intelligent, but his "hot takes" have become increasingly ideologically driven as opposed to actual data driven science.
@@rext3404 Niel is the perfect case study in how popular science (or more accurately, the Cult of Scientism) has been bought and paid for using narcissistic actors with dubious credentials.
Terryhedrons sounds like something from a Rick and Morty episode.
Goes to show TH is as narcissistic as he is mad.
Terry is also complaining that the square root of something isn’t the shape of a square at all 📦 🤷🏽♀️
It's not the shape of a root either.
😄😆🤣
if he eats one apple one time, that means he ate two apples 😂
Terryological diets keeping us big as heck
@@mcfarvo literally jesus
Simple explain: take (N number of things) x (N number of times) = N, In other words if you take £1 from a pile, 1 amount of times, you'll have £1. If you take £1 from a pile 2 times, you'll have £2.....and so on.
1.41x1.41=2, so 1x1 should also be 2? Flawless logic... on that note, we should round pi to just 3.
Here's a word he can have: terryble.
PI IS EXACTLY FOUR!
😂🤣😂
Yah I can't explain that in a group lol
i mean pi == e after all
@@_aullik Please do not multiply equal signs, you will break some Terryology fan's brain.
I'm not a mathematician not a scientist but every time I hear Terrence Howard speak about this ,the words bullsh*t n narcissist illuminates in my brain😂😂
Did he emphasize his self value to anyone that he wants to claim self significant above others he's just explaining some things that I even don't even know he didn't even force anyone to believe in him but the guy is thinking outside of the box
@@justinkurtrivera2315 you got to listen to him a lot more you'll start to see the arrogance and the narcissism come out , I had the same thoughts that you did when I first heard him speak and then I was like oh this is interesting! then I start listening to him more and I'm like nah this guy is suspect ! He's either just that much of a narcissist or he is just a intelligent nut job
@@justinkurtrivera2315 Not to be rude here justin, but the only type of person that cannot see the very obvious underlying narcissistic traits in terrance, are the uneducated people who actually think hes saying somthing of value because hes spitting out some big words that they dont personally understand. You said it yourself, you dont understand what hes saying, and yet you assume hes smart regardless, despite watching a video that details for you why hes wrong, your still here acting all bamboozled.
Id strongly encourage you to work on practicing some healthy skepticism. The ability to identify bullshit, understand the scientific method, distill misinformation, ect..
Terrance is not a genius...maybe watcu this video again if your still confused....or actually study some of the things you claim to not understand but choose to believe in regardless..
You know we are in the era of Idiocracy when people look up to this guy as a mathematical genius. I’m sure Princeton is now considering awarding Albert Einstein’s chair in Physics at the Institute for Advanced Study to Kanye West
Although I highly doubt that I could ever express it with anywhere near the same eloquence, and I don't have a Master full knowledge of linguistics I do have what you might call an OCD about correct expression when expressing one's opinion about any number of topics. I find myself inadvertently correcting those around me in an attempt to extend their ability to have the same correct expression in achieving the points they wish to get across. I think this facet of my life is what draws me to your channel and achieves the level of enjoyment that I hardly get with other forms of content that neither server linguistic purpose nor have the knowledge of linguistics to express what they're trying to convey as much as yourself. I sincerely appreciate the way you took "Terryology" to task and served it a good note of actual perceivable knowledge. Excellent job I really enjoyed it.
Brian in Tucson Arizona USA
Jesus Christ this comment sounds like it was made by Terry himself in a desperate attempt to sound smarter than those around him.. "im so smart i correct those around me and I have no idea why no one invites me to parties anymore!" 🙄
Working as an auditor/accountant for Terrence or taking his order in a restaurant must be an absolute nightmare, unless you can use Terryology against him and have him pay you double.
Terrence Howard is either doing some next level method acting as a conspiracy theorist or he really just lost his mind. I am betting on the second one, however would be really funny if the first thing come out true (most likely won't).
Or he just wants to make money. Creates controversy. Writes a book. Sells a book. Makes money. Writers make 10-15% of the book sales. Millions of books mean millions of $.
@@zaco-km3su Or this, right
I'm amazed I'm alive at a time when anybody (even if just 20 people) believe this... I'm utterly stunned that enough believe this, to justify the effort of a debunking.
look at the podcast, they are clearly having fun at his expense, similar with terry davis and his holy C.
@@theforsakeen177 I didn't say JRE and crew believed him, but there are people who do!
It's frightening how many people in the comments section of that video buy into it lock, stock and barrel.
thanks for your precious work M. Surprised you did not mention Russell, who used words to consolidate the foundations of maths, with Whitehead,. the squared root loop is real as other wonders pullable from irrationals, as the squared of zero getting very close to the amount of atoms in our observable universe, in negative ex. I love you going this path. You are a treasure and a blessing for all who have the chance to get this. Thanks Metatron.