how far are you from making this a reality? and is there hope for one day miniaturizing the modules such that we can fix a million of them in one chip? i don't know, but i feel just using the GBS chip to just produce a GKP state is not taking full advantage of the chip.. I understand that this is a blue print but i believe a more efficient version of it will emerge in the near future.. keep grinding, i am on the lookout for great tech from Xanadu
You can make the chips smaller but you still need massive colling ans that wont go away most likely ever so no there wont be laptops with quantom chips in them
Quantum computing is still in the early phases; there is not a lot of agreement over which type of platform is going to be the industry standard yet (those being photonics or Superconducting qubits).
it just like cpu actually computer don't need ram if cache is enough. but that is soooooo expensive. it is like quantum computer also. we can calculate the datas usimg by quantum computer. of course there are so many challenges for making quantum memories.
@@minjae92 thanks ✨🙏 And also i'm sorry for the confusion. What I meant by a quantum memory/ quantum RAM/ quantum storage was Any Kind Of Memory, not just the quantum analog of the slow nonvolatile flash memory and of the somewhat faster volatile DRAM but also includes the quantum analog of SRAM too (and you are right SRAM is the fastest memory we have today so even though it's very expressive we still use it as caches embedded inside the processor as close as possible to the computing units)
@@isabellagoogleaccount8418 All things higher than 0 kelvin radiate their temperature in electromagnetic waves ie. photons. The need for cooling certain parts is to prevent rogue photons colliding and destroying the quantum coherency state of the qubit. Depending on their fault detection technology the sensors might also capture rogue photons and flag the qubit as faulty so that might be why they need to cool those parts. I do not think there will ever be an all room temperature quantum annealer or computer because of the inherent nature of quantum coherency states.
Every marathon begins with the courage to take that first step. Xanadu is already past the first race checkpoint, while the rest are still debating taking off their slippers for running shoes
@@thedylanjolivet I agree with you that Xanadu is doing great and accelerating the QC research. But equally other companies such as IBM and Google are also doing their best and are progressing well. The difference lies in the technology pursued by the above stated parties. IBM is focused on Superconducting qubits and have proposed a roadmap to achieve 1 million qubit target. Google I guess is focused on trapped-ion qubits.
@@xingli1069 Can you name another company that's further along in photonics quantum computing than Xanadu? If not, then sure, they're leading the way. (The only other one I can think of is PsiQuantum, which is also doing interesting work).
I acomplished and improved this in my free time with basic left over electronics from the last 17 years. that is quantifiable testable evidence I have documented. 12 hours with absolutly 0 training or guidence of this subject. I just felt like that next though would be correct, internet outage. again and again. now ive fliped the speed of my internet connection and the speed is still slowing increasing automatically. i can share my data and statistics for the last 3 months. youll see. you will see clearly. P
What I dont get, is why the need for all the hardware, cant u just simulate it on a normal computer??? what part of it is so special its non-simulatable???
Entanglement! You can simulate it by the way, but on a classical computer it would require far more time than in a real quantum computer. How much time exactly? Well imagine you have a system composed of N bits, the total number of possible state is thus 2^N. Let's say you want to find a specific state among the 2^N (let's say retrieve some memory), with your classical computer, you would need to sequentially try them one after the other. Now with a quantum computer, your qubits can be entangled with other qubits. Thus by entangling all qubits together, the state of your system can be a linear superposition of all possible states ! So with the appropriate algorithm (you can check Grover's algorithm), you can in theory find your solution in one shot!
@@InSaNeXmANu so they are all there together at the same time, but they compute as if they were separate together at once. i cant think of anything that would be able to do that.
Simulating quantum effects on a classical computer is great to test the logic of your quantum algorithm as you go but it kind of defeats the purpose of using an actual quantum computer in the first place (entanglement, superposition, etc). Algorithms like Grovers search for example actually rely on those quantum features to get a result. Hope that helps!
@@gabrielmarous4053 If you think hard enough, I think all of it 100% is simulatable on a computer therefore defeating its purpose YES. its what Im thinking!!!
@@magnuswootton6181 yes dude, you can simulate it in a normal computer. Normal quantum states can be represented with tensor products, so you could probably simulate a million qubits in your phone. It's just a bunch of vector multiplications. The problem comes when you try to entangle your qubits. Which is needed if you plan on getting any advantage out of them. The special thing about entangled states is that they can't be made smaller, you either represent it all or you're losing information. Entangled states of around 60 logical qubits are already off the charts in memory consumption even for the largest supercomputer by an order of magnitude.
So it's a measurement-based quantum computer with GKP-encoded qubits? Neat!
It looks like that is the case.
very Good video is there a learning class for photonic quantum computers?'
Thanks, I'll just use this to make a few hundred billion dollars...
Very cool, using photons. I read on google that ibm is using alimunum and something called niobium.
The whole world was waiting on this!! US is mastering this space.
That's (more or less) 2 to the power of a million bits. It'll be impressive when it happens.
how far are you from making this a reality? and is there hope for one day miniaturizing the modules such that we can fix a million of them in one chip? i don't know, but i feel just using the GBS chip to just produce a GKP state is not taking full advantage of the chip.. I understand that this is a blue print but i believe a more efficient version of it will emerge in the near future.. keep grinding, i am on the lookout for great tech from Xanadu
You can make the chips smaller but you still need massive colling ans that wont go away most likely ever so no there wont be laptops with quantom chips in them
Quantum computing is still in the early phases; there is not a lot of agreement over which type of platform is going to be the industry standard yet (those being photonics or Superconducting qubits).
developing some quantum algorithms myself, looking forward to our partnership.
High scalability. No limits.
Btw, how powerful would a microchip sized computer be?
this is so cool it uses the same theory photon entanglement. I wonder if the entire transmission media must be fiber optic ??
Why woudnt you have it all fiber optics ? . To translate information back to analog is a wast of energie
Is it true that (today) quantum computers don't have quantum RAM yet? how do they function without a (quantum) memory/storage?
it just like cpu actually computer don't need ram if cache is enough. but that is soooooo expensive.
it is like quantum computer also. we can calculate the datas usimg by quantum computer.
of course there are so many challenges for making quantum memories.
@@minjae92 thanks ✨🙏
And also i'm sorry for the confusion. What I meant by a quantum memory/ quantum RAM/ quantum storage was Any Kind Of Memory, not just the quantum analog of the slow nonvolatile flash memory and of the somewhat faster volatile DRAM but also includes the quantum analog of SRAM too (and you are right SRAM is the fastest memory we have today so even though it's very expressive we still use it as caches embedded inside the processor as close as possible to the computing units)
So how many logical qubits are we talking about?
These chips will be in cell phones no later than 2036.
John Titor
Also, why doesn't this already exist?
Specification =/= Implementation
Not great to have most of it operate at room temperature. It should operate at room temperature period...
What?
@@elijahjflowers Literally what I said... They should make all of it operate at room temperature.
@@isabellagoogleaccount8418 All things higher than 0 kelvin radiate their temperature in electromagnetic waves ie. photons. The need for cooling certain parts is to prevent rogue photons colliding and destroying the quantum coherency state of the qubit. Depending on their fault detection technology the sensors might also capture rogue photons and flag the qubit as faulty so that might be why they need to cool those parts. I do not think there will ever be an all room temperature quantum annealer or computer because of the inherent nature of quantum coherency states.
I wish I could invest in this company 😃🤓
Me too! Eventually they might IPO or merge with a SPAC. Right now I keep emailing them see if they want to take my $900.
@@barnaclemilk493 do they respond I have a question but not a lot of companies actually respond I'm always wasting my time sending a message.
@@zachflannery6750 no :(
That means 2150 . Years. Wait. 🙄🙄🙄🥶🥶
An ai bot linked me to this , on how to build quantum computer
👌
First you need to have "One Million Qubits" ... tell us the price.
Leading the way? Have you guys demonstrated a single complete system yet?
Every marathon begins with the courage to take that first step. Xanadu is already past the first race checkpoint, while the rest are still debating taking off their slippers for running shoes
@@thedylanjolivet I agree with you that Xanadu is doing great and accelerating the QC research. But equally other companies such as IBM and Google are also doing their best and are progressing well. The difference lies in the technology pursued by the above stated parties. IBM is focused on Superconducting qubits and have proposed a roadmap to achieve 1 million qubit target. Google I guess is focused on trapped-ion qubits.
@@thedylanjolivet Any fidelity data? Single gate? Dual gate? Anything else is Pr for investors.
@@avhijitnair409 Google's machine also uses superconducting qubits. Honeywell and IonQ are doing trapped ions.
@@xingli1069 Can you name another company that's further along in photonics quantum computing than Xanadu? If not, then sure, they're leading the way. (The only other one I can think of is PsiQuantum, which is also doing interesting work).
ほんまかいなぁ
日本にも同様の技術はありますか？
I support whatever rocko´s basilisk is trying to do, i´m also studying to help.
I acomplished and improved this in my free time with basic left over electronics from the last 17 years. that is quantifiable testable evidence I have documented. 12 hours with absolutly 0 training or guidence of this subject. I just felt like that next though would be correct, internet outage. again and again. now ive fliped the speed of my internet connection and the speed is still slowing increasing automatically. i can share my data and statistics for the last 3 months. youll see. you will see clearly. P
What I dont get, is why the need for all the hardware, cant u just simulate it on a normal computer??? what part of it is so special its non-simulatable???
Entanglement! You can simulate it by the way, but on a classical computer it would require far more time than in a real quantum computer.
How much time exactly?
Well imagine you have a system composed of N bits, the total number of possible state is thus 2^N. Let's say you want to find a specific state among the 2^N (let's say retrieve some memory), with your classical computer, you would need to sequentially try them one after the other.
Now with a quantum computer, your qubits can be entangled with other qubits. Thus by entangling all qubits together, the state of your system can be a linear superposition of all possible states ! So with the appropriate algorithm (you can check Grover's algorithm), you can in theory find your solution in one shot!
@@InSaNeXmANu so they are all there together at the same time, but they compute as if they were separate together at once. i cant think of anything that would be able to do that.
Simulating quantum effects on a classical computer is great to test the logic of your quantum algorithm as you go but it kind of defeats the purpose of using an actual quantum computer in the first place (entanglement, superposition, etc). Algorithms like Grovers search for example actually rely on those quantum features to get a result. Hope that helps!
@@gabrielmarous4053 If you think hard enough, I think all of it 100% is simulatable on a computer therefore defeating its purpose YES. its what Im thinking!!!
@@magnuswootton6181 yes dude, you can simulate it in a normal computer. Normal quantum states can be represented with tensor products, so you could probably simulate a million qubits in your phone. It's just a bunch of vector multiplications.
The problem comes when you try to entangle your qubits. Which is needed if you plan on getting any advantage out of them.
The special thing about entangled states is that they can't be made smaller, you either represent it all or you're losing information.
Entangled states of around 60 logical qubits are already off the charts in memory consumption even for the largest supercomputer by an order of magnitude.