What do you have to say about the sangam literature which is researched even today like thirukural, silapathikaaram, seevakasinthaamani in 3rd century BC.
This guy is very shallow and trying to make a living out of Indian history. He doesn't know anything about Tamil Sangam literature. Without that knowledge, he can't be an academic historian, period.
While there is probably no incription from sangam era (3rd century BCE to 3rd century CE) south india discussing what was the court language, do we understand that they used local language as there were less influence of sanskrit at that time. Or does he talk about Rashtrakutas as a larg empire in the post arrival of sanskrit era that went back to Kannada as administrative language?
He was referring to the literary works that happened with the support of the king. Until then, local languages were used for administrative purposes while much of the literary works were in Sanskrit. Kadamba (3rd to 6th CE) were using kannada as an administrative language but there are no significant literary work from this period. In Tamil as well, much of the literary works exploded during the late pallava period and the early Tanjavur Chola period. Not much is known from Kalabhra period (contemporaries of Kadamba who ruled a significant part of Tamilnadu post early Cholas).
@@pavankumarhk7074 better you should be a historian to talk about Tamil's history. Anirudh completed Bachelor of Engineering and started to write history. He doesn't even know ABCD of history. I think you are referring to Bhathi literatures (which is medieval period). But the Samgam literatures are composed between 3rd BCE to 3rd CE. In Samgam literature (3nd century BCE) there is no Pallava kingdoms or any Karnataka/Telungu kindoms are mentioned
Kannada the first court, administrative official local vernacular language of India. Also having its own script at earliest in vernacular indian language.
I know nothing about Kannada language or any South Indian languages and I could be proud if I knew. We can be cruel to each others even today or Yesterday. But here agenda is to show that cruelty of Abrahamic’s is normal and our forefathers not only fought and killed each others, also broken other kings Mandir. Yes, it might happened today also, a Person or group also killed someone for their enmity. But we, those carrying our old nature or culture, neither hate nor teach like some other community are still doing & which happening in Bharat also. Are they really discussing something else ? Hope I’m wrong.
Religious bigotry with dominance of civilisations around the fertile crescent often has seen that minor kingdoms go unnoticed.But that does not mean politics has no role to play. Interpretation of issues of what can provoke war has as much importance. I can think historians can rewrite history by identify issues which created war like situations especially major ones.
Arya varth is full of buddism from BC to 7th ce, continuous invade on North India by south indian kings like chaalukya and Raashtrakutaa kings, displaced budhism to Hiduism, and temple building started instead of budha caves. And Aryan culture like Vedas we don't have temples that time of Hinduism. Still today we see more ancient temple in south.
This guy is not a historian rather he is a joker. He just says poetry starts appearing in vernacular languages only after Amoghavarsha started it for Kannada. Tamil poetry started in the court of Pandya kings a good thousand years before that. For this guy, history started only during medieval era
@@jai7185 Dude we have archaeological evidences from Keeladi, Adichanallur, Kodunal to say Tamil language existed minimum 2500 years ago. Kannada is also an ancient language which I agree but let me know how much years it is old based on archaeological evidences, not based on pride
Ha ha currently we are working on connections between earliest Tamil script with IVC unlike others who are fighting about which language came first in India !
What is this guy taking about, completely omitting the sangam corpus that pre-dates kaviraja margam by a 1000 years ! Or is he agreeing that Tamil is a classical language ?
Thanks for publishing this book 🙏
Nice work by Anirudh
Awesome 😊
Chaluka pride of Karnataka
So proud of our Kannada Kings 🫡. Being a telugite I salute them. It’s high time for us to learn the actual history.
Is that Mrs. Sudha Murthy asking question at 45th minute?
What do you have to say about the sangam literature which is researched even today like thirukural, silapathikaaram, seevakasinthaamani in 3rd century BC.
This guy is very shallow and trying to make a living out of Indian history. He doesn't know anything about Tamil Sangam literature. Without that knowledge, he can't be an academic historian, period.
What is he talking about? Tamil has been court language all through Sangam era from 3rd century BC.
Golti power! Yey!!!
golti crying on corner lol
While there is probably no incription from sangam era (3rd century BCE to 3rd century CE) south india discussing what was the court language, do we understand that they used local language as there were less influence of sanskrit at that time. Or does he talk about Rashtrakutas as a larg empire in the post arrival of sanskrit era that went back to Kannada as administrative language?
He was referring to the literary works that happened with the support of the king. Until then, local languages were used for administrative purposes while much of the literary works were in Sanskrit. Kadamba (3rd to 6th CE) were using kannada as an administrative language but there are no significant literary work from this period. In Tamil as well, much of the literary works exploded during the late pallava period and the early Tanjavur Chola period. Not much is known from Kalabhra period (contemporaries of Kadamba who ruled a significant part of Tamilnadu post early Cholas).
@@pavankumarhk7074 better you should be a historian to talk about Tamil's history. Anirudh completed Bachelor of Engineering and started to write history. He doesn't even know ABCD of history. I think you are referring to Bhathi literatures (which is medieval period). But the Samgam literatures are composed between 3rd BCE to 3rd CE. In Samgam literature (3nd century BCE) there is no Pallava kingdoms or any Karnataka/Telungu kindoms are mentioned
It should have been lords of Kannada, not sure why its called Deccan.
Kannada the first court, administrative official local vernacular language of India. Also having its own script at earliest in vernacular indian language.
Knowledge, teaching materials
In Sanskrit
Holy Force
I know nothing about Kannada language or any South Indian languages
and I could be proud if I knew.
We can be cruel to each others even today or Yesterday.
But here agenda is to show that cruelty of Abrahamic’s is normal
and our forefathers not only fought and killed each others, also
broken other kings Mandir. Yes, it might happened today also,
a Person or group also killed someone for their enmity.
But we, those carrying our old nature or culture, neither hate nor teach
like some other community are still doing & which happening in Bharat also.
Are they really discussing something else ? Hope I’m wrong.
Chalukya = Bhagwan Chanakya CHITRODA Empire Cholla was one of the businesses and Bahmani was the Indian Hindu Moghul Army INA.
⚡️🤴🏽🕉🔺➕
Religious bigotry with dominance of civilisations around the fertile crescent often has seen that minor kingdoms go unnoticed.But that does not mean politics has no role to play. Interpretation of issues of what can provoke war has as much importance. I can think historians can rewrite history by identify issues which created war like situations especially major ones.
There is no evidence of Bharat as a term before 400 BC.
It was given by the Bharatha kingdom, part of Arya-Vartha in North India, then spread South.
Arya varth is full of buddism from BC to 7th ce, continuous invade on North India by south indian kings like chaalukya and Raashtrakutaa kings, displaced budhism to Hiduism, and temple building started instead of budha caves. And Aryan culture like Vedas we don't have temples that time of Hinduism. Still today we see more ancient temple in south.
This guy is not a historian rather he is a joker. He just says poetry starts appearing in vernacular languages only after Amoghavarsha started it for Kannada. Tamil poetry started in the court of Pandya kings a good thousand years before that. For this guy, history started only during medieval era
Exactly ... kannada language origin is in medival age ...but tamil is oldest thats why it is mother of all languages
Kannada language splits & became independent much before the tamil as a spoken language, so kannada is ancient language.
@@jai7185 Dude we have archaeological evidences from Keeladi, Adichanallur, Kodunal to say Tamil language existed minimum 2500 years ago. Kannada is also an ancient language which I agree but let me know how much years it is old based on archaeological evidences, not based on pride
@@raghuls1515That's a false pride u guys still struck in. Thats why we call Tamil as Arava
@tharun541 bro halmidi inscription it's the oldest found kannada inscription its 2500 years old you can check for it
completely biased
All Tamil praise about old language is fake. Telugu is the best of all
lol golti burned
Ha ha currently we are working on connections between earliest Tamil script with IVC unlike others who are fighting about which language came first in India !
What is this guy taking about, completely omitting the sangam corpus that pre-dates kaviraja margam by a 1000 years !
Or is he agreeing that Tamil is a classical language ?