1:24:25 - Damn! He didn't even answer the lady's Q; he ducked and spewed generic facts known to many. My personal Q, why did the many vassals of *Rashtrakuta* not defend their capital city - Manyakheta - when it was being sacked? what was the reason for Gangas delayed response in providing the military backup? why it took them 2 weeks/months of response time?
Cuz. Rashtrakuta empire is not a centralized one. Every vassal had a varying interests. Not everyone supported the imperial family, even within the imperial family there are some antagonistic characters.
@12:22 There was no maharshtri prakrit in 5thC. AD Chalukyas never used maharshtri prakrit in any of their inscriptions They were ardent admirers of Kannada and all their temples, monuments bore inscriptions in Kannada and few in sanskrit
@@AN-bx2lx So this means you refer to inauthentic sources, LoL The very first time the word Prakrit is found in 6th C. AD Buddhists used to refer the Kannada mixed Prakrit as Dakshinatya Prakrit After Chalukyas formed MahaRashtrakas The prarit in deccan got the name as maharashtri prakrit There are no evidences of name as prakrit, sankrit before 6thC. AD
That's precisely why aurangzeb is brought into conversation. It's an attempt to homogenise brahmanism, which has and continues to be incredibly violent.
1:24:25 - Damn! He didn't even answer the lady's Q; he ducked and spewed generic facts known to many.
My personal Q, why did the many vassals of *Rashtrakuta* not defend their capital city - Manyakheta - when it was being sacked? what was the reason for Gangas delayed response in providing the military backup? why it took them 2 weeks/months of response time?
Cuz. Rashtrakuta empire is not a centralized one. Every vassal had a varying interests. Not everyone supported the imperial family, even within the imperial family there are some antagonistic characters.
Very important discussion.
@12:22
There was no maharshtri prakrit in 5thC. AD
Chalukyas never used maharshtri prakrit in any of their inscriptions
They were ardent admirers of Kannada and all their temples, monuments bore inscriptions in Kannada and few in sanskrit
Authentic source?
Facts are spoken by documented proofs and not what one believes in!
@@AN-bx2lx
So this means you refer to inauthentic sources, LoL
The very first time the word Prakrit is found in 6th C. AD
Buddhists used to refer the Kannada mixed Prakrit as Dakshinatya Prakrit
After Chalukyas formed MahaRashtrakas
The prarit in deccan got the name as maharashtri prakrit
There are no evidences of name as prakrit, sankrit before 6thC. AD
Anirudh very smartly uses sound effects to give people an experience..
Lords of the Deccan.......free flowing . A good story of India.
not sure why we say Deccan. , its mostly Karnataka kings chalukya , rashtrakutas and the like
Jai Maharashtra
Deccan at that time was not Maharashtra, but Karnataka and only Karnataka.
Guys grow up. Look beyond maharashtra and karnataka and andhra and telegana.
This book is a befitting reply to Modi’s tirade against Aurangazeb .Our own Hindu kings were violent and guilty of fratricide too.
Nonsense
That's precisely why aurangzeb is brought into conversation. It's an attempt to homogenise brahmanism, which has and continues to be incredibly violent.
But they were never praised for that, like Ashoka, expect Muslims glorify these brother killing Emperors.
@@ReddyAlwaysReadyWhom are you kidding ? They are glorified. Marathas are glorified and they are no better than Turks when it comes to carnage.
@@codenamevisage when did the Marathas Kill 40,000 or more inhabitants, who not were physically fighting them, in a city after they captured it?