What is the hydrostatic paradox? How did Pascal destroy the barrel using a mug of water?

How was Pascal able to destroy the barrel with the help of a mug and a pipe? What is hydrostatic pressure? How to determine the force of pressure on an area? What is the hydrostatic paradox?These and other questions are answered in the video.

[@Dubtee]

I'm not sure why I've never hear of this experiment before, but it's incredibly interesting and leads me to many new concepts.

[@hydraulicandpneumaticsyste3253]

It could very well be a fictional story. Right now, no one can say whether there was such an experiment or not. In fact, this is an illustration of Pascal's law.

[@loasisapokalyptik2043]

@@hydraulicandpneumaticsyste3253 on youtube there are several experiments that have all failed ... search for "Baril de Pascal" ...
Where is the earth's curvature? Where is Coriolis? nowhere but in people's minds

[@Moltimer5050]

Why is this not a common example used!!! You cleared up so many questions I had thank you 😀

[@Ataraxia2024]

Your channel is very valuable. Thanks for the explanation.

[@HiltsR]

,
Wonderful video, thks

[@hydraulicandpneumaticsyste3253]

thanks for the comment

[@dondon25]

This is very helpful. Thanks u for dis 🤙

[@hydraulicandpneumaticsyste3253]

thanks for the comment

[@zacharyvanstanley9488]

So, you could potentially use this in conjunction with the boiling rates of water at different pressures to change the temp needed to boil, right?

[@hyphen8d725]

Thank you!

[@gauthamsnair6665]

But isn't the area of the second flask less making the force equal?

[@vasilijgredasov5338]

no

[@sagarpuri7838]

I think this is still impossible

[@kalpeshdeore149]

Which soft. Do u use for animation ?

[@hydraulicandpneumaticsyste3253]

Cinema 4d

[@kalpeshdeore149]

@@hydraulicandpneumaticsyste3253 it has water physics ?

[@theeraphatsunthornwit6266]

There must be some level of discrepancy between real life and theory, or otherwise you can destroy anything with just a mug of water and long tube.

[@emilr.n.jakobsen8295]

A paradox is essentially an idea which simultaneously holds true and false like a Schrödinger's cat in superimposed states of life and death. I suppose in past scientific communities Pascal's paradox was considered as such with the same reasoning as an existential paradox would qualify. In essence the phenomenon was assumed an impossibility not only proved possible despite all human intuition, but also later thoroughly described in full mathematical glory, making the apparent paradox no longer an assumed impossibility, but explained by new and incoming scientific reason and thus no longer a paradox.
I wonder whether the limitations of human communication will safely avoid the undoing of any existence-critical paradoxes in the same way for mankind in the future. What would happen if humankind were to run out of shit to explain because their very own purpose has been voided via reason?

[@hydraulicandpneumaticsyste3253]

Yes, at present this is just an illustration of the law of physics, but it was once a paradox.

[@emilr.n.jakobsen8295]

Thanks@@hydraulicandpneumaticsyste3253! I now feel smarter and wiser for our collective agreement. Continue the education.

[@loasisapokalyptik2043]

@@hydraulicandpneumaticsyste3253 Olbers's paradox ....

[@MdHUSSAIN-mt2zb]

Tha.nks