What is the hydrostatic paradox? How did Pascal destroy the barrel using a mug of water?

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 29 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 26

  • @Dubtee
    @Dubtee 2 роки тому +10

    I'm not sure why I've never hear of this experiment before, but it's incredibly interesting and leads me to many new concepts.

    • @hydraulicandpneumaticsyste3253
      @hydraulicandpneumaticsyste3253  2 роки тому +2

      It could very well be a fictional story. Right now, no one can say whether there was such an experiment or not. In fact, this is an illustration of Pascal's law.

    • @loasisapokalyptik2043
      @loasisapokalyptik2043 Рік тому

      @@hydraulicandpneumaticsyste3253 on youtube there are several experiments that have all failed ... search for "Baril de Pascal" ...
      Where is the earth's curvature? Where is Coriolis? nowhere but in people's minds

  • @Ataraxia2024
    @Ataraxia2024 11 місяців тому +1

    Your channel is very valuable. Thanks for the explanation.

  • @Moltimer5050
    @Moltimer5050 7 місяців тому

    Why is this not a common example used!!! You cleared up so many questions I had thank you 😀

  • @HiltsR
    @HiltsR 2 роки тому +3

    ,
    Wonderful video, thks

  • @zacharyvanstanley9488
    @zacharyvanstanley9488 10 місяців тому

    So, you could potentially use this in conjunction with the boiling rates of water at different pressures to change the temp needed to boil, right?

  • @dondon25
    @dondon25 2 роки тому +2

    This is very helpful. Thanks u for dis 🤙

  • @sivagauravallada
    @sivagauravallada Місяць тому

    sir what is meant by paradox

  • @hyphen8d725
    @hyphen8d725 2 роки тому

    Thank you!

  • @gauthamsnair6665
    @gauthamsnair6665 2 роки тому +2

    But isn't the area of the second flask less making the force equal?

  • @kalpeshdeore149
    @kalpeshdeore149 2 роки тому +1

    Which soft. Do u use for animation ?

  • @vasilijgredasov5338
    @vasilijgredasov5338 Рік тому +1

    no

  • @sagarpuri7838
    @sagarpuri7838 2 роки тому +8

    I think this is still impossible

  • @theeraphatsunthornwit6266
    @theeraphatsunthornwit6266 Рік тому +1

    There must be some level of discrepancy between real life and theory, or otherwise you can destroy anything with just a mug of water and long tube.

  • @ernj85
    @ernj85 Рік тому

    A paradox is essentially an idea which simultaneously holds true and false like a Schrödinger's cat in superimposed states of life and death. I suppose in past scientific communities Pascal's paradox was considered as such with the same reasoning as an existential paradox would qualify. In essence the phenomenon was assumed an impossibility not only proved possible despite all human intuition, but also later thoroughly described in full mathematical glory, making the apparent paradox no longer an assumed impossibility, but explained by new and incoming scientific reason and thus no longer a paradox.
    I wonder whether the limitations of human communication will safely avoid the undoing of any existence-critical paradoxes in the same way for mankind in the future. What would happen if humankind were to run out of shit to explain because their very own purpose has been voided via reason?

    • @hydraulicandpneumaticsyste3253
      @hydraulicandpneumaticsyste3253  Рік тому +1

      Yes, at present this is just an illustration of the law of physics, but it was once a paradox.

    • @ernj85
      @ernj85 Рік тому

      Thanks@@hydraulicandpneumaticsyste3253! I now feel smarter and wiser for our collective agreement. Continue the education.

    • @loasisapokalyptik2043
      @loasisapokalyptik2043 Рік тому

      @@hydraulicandpneumaticsyste3253 Olbers's paradox ....

  • @MdHUSSAIN-mt2zb
    @MdHUSSAIN-mt2zb 2 роки тому +1

    Tha.nks